Sir,
In their concise review on evolving treatment strategies for myeloma, Morgan and Davies (2005) stated that ‘early death was, and still is, a significant problem, and addressing the causes of this is important including early diagnosis, the treatment of infection, hydration and the choice of the most appropriate chemotherapy’. The most common presenting symptoms of the disease are fatigue, bone pain and recurrent infections. The latest classification system, recently released from The International Myeloma Working Group (2003), highlighted the importance to distinguish between asymptomatic and overt myeloma, because only the latter requires active treatment. According to this statement, the biological activity of the disease, more than the tumour mass, is the foremost guide to the therapy. The related organ or tissue impairment (ROTI) that meets the criterion for the diagnosis consists of hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anaemia or bone lesions (a group of findings referred to as CRAB). However, we need to understand that some of the clinical features of the disease, as the degree of anaemia, are not completely explained by the plasma cellular infiltrates or paraprotein secretion. Although uncommonly, myeloma can present as fever of unknown origin (FUO) (Mueller et al, 2002; Lambotte et al, 2003). In these cases the fever is attributable to the disease itself, and indeed no infections are demonstrable, even with extensive work-up. Moreover, the fever cannot be abated with antibiotics although chemotherapy works well (Mumoli et al, 2004). It is not already known if the modulation of the interaction between the neoplastic clone and the marrow microenvironment, as is the case during therapy with bortezomib, could reverse this kind of presentation; this could in turn result in delaying chemotherapy, at least in patients not eligible for transplantation procedures. Morgan and Davies conclude saying that in the future it will be desirable to describe myeloma as a treatable disease with prolonged survival and good quality of life if the correct treatment decisions are made. We agree with this and we add, moreover, if the correct diagnosis has also been made. We therefore suggest that FUO should be mentioned as an indication for diagnosis and therapy in myeloma patients.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
The International Myeloma Working Group (2003) Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol 121: 749–757
Lambotte O, Rayer B, Genet P, Brice P, Brovet JC, Fermand JP (2003) Multiple myeloma presenting as fever of unknown origin. Eur J Intern Med 14(2): 94–97
Morgan GJ, Davies FE (2005) Evolving treatment strategies for myeloma. Br J Cancer 92: 217–221
Mueller PS, Terrel CL, Gertz MA (2002) Fever of unknown origin caused by multiple myeloma: a report of 9 cases. Arch Intern Med 62: 1305–1309
Mumoli N, Cei M, Incensati R, Verzuri S (2004) Multiple myeloma in a patient with fever of unknown origin and cholestasis. Can Med Assoc J 170: 1809–1810
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Mumoli, N., Cei, M. Multiple myeloma and fever of unknown origin: a need for therapy. Br J Cancer 93, 266 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602693
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602693