Sir,
The article of Nakajima et al (2003) in the Journal addresses a problem of major public health importance, concluding that screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test (FOBT) can be effective for prevention of advanced colorectal cancer. However, the screening method applied in their case–control study (i.e. the immunochemical haemagglutination method described by Saito et al (1995) may direct the attention to the rather controversial area of which is the optimal screening tool, if any, for early detection of colorectal cancer and its precursors.
Recently, the scientific and clinical evidences for the use of the available colorectal cancer-screening tests were critically assessed (Walsh and Terdiman, 2003a, 2003b). Supported by a large body of direct and indirect evidence, those review articles concluded recommending that all asymptomatic men and women over 50 years of age and older should undergo screening; however, it stated, ‘at present, the available evidence does not support choosing any test over the others’. In the same time, after having reviewed the available evidence, a special advisory group appointed by the American Cancer Society highlighted immunological stool testing as the only exception from its general conclusion that this time there is insufficient evidence to recommend the other emerging technologies for routine colorectal cancer screening (Levin et al, 2003).
Since the effectiveness of FOBT has been established by randomised controlled trials (Mandel et al, 1993; Mendel et al, 1999; Kronborg et al, 1996; Hardcastle et al, 1996), several tests based on peroxidase activity and guaiac-type reagents for colour reaction are most widely used on a public health scale, being noninvasive, simple and cheap methods, However, these reagents are not human-specific, because they may give positive reaction even with the peroxidase of several food stuffs, both of plant and animal origin (Cole and Young, 1999). These shortcomings result in an unacceptably high false positive rate.
To eliminate these shortcomings, a number of combined methods consisting of a guaiac test and an immunochemical test have been developed. In addition to the increased specificity, the immunochemical FOBTs have the advantage of not requiring dietary or drug restrictions, therefore are more patient-friendly, and more suitable for mass application. In recent years, several such immunological techniques have developed (Ottó and Eckhardt, 2000).
However, several problems may reduce the efficiency of these methods (St John et al, 1993; Ottó and Eckhardt, 2000). Most of these immunological techniques are usually limited to the demonstration of haemoglobin in the faeces. For example, depending on the site of bleeding, a certain degradation of haemoglobin may take place, or, faecal haemoglobin may become irreversibly bound to special components of the faeces. To eliminate these potential sources of error, some investigators have suggested the demonstration of additional proteins, more stable in the faeces than haemoglobin, as possible new indicators of intestinal bleeding.
We ourselves have developed a combined electrophoretic–immunoprecipitation technique of high sensitivity (2 μg ml−1), suitable for simultaneous demonstration of two blood proteins, that is, haemoglobin and albumin, in the faecal sample (Ottó and Németh, 1993). The technique is simple, inexpensive and suitable for the reliable detection of occult blood. The parallel demonstration of the two proteins significantly enhanced the detectability of symptomless colorectal cancer (Ottó and Német, 1996). Furthermore, using immune sera raised against native haemoglobin and its fragments, as a differential diagnostic method, our technique is suitable for parallel demonstration of haemoglobin and its fragments; in this way, the origin of the bleeding can be localised (Ottó et al, 1995).
The modified two-phase (guaiac-type and immunochemical) faecal occult blood test (FECA-TEST) was used (without diet) as a screening tool in a pilot population-screening project for early detection of colorectal cancer. The project was carried out in 1997–1998 in a well-defined administrative area of the Capital, Budapest, Hungary (where – like in many other developed countries – colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death; therefore, screening for colorectal cancer is a major public health concern) with support from the World Bank ‘Close the gap’ public health programme. The purpose of the project was to demonstrate the feasibility and validity of the test is screening context, in addition to social acceptance and impact on early cure.
In total, 21 945 persons of the target population received the sample collecting containers, distributed by the family physicians, and 6805 persons had returned it, thus the compliance rate was 31%. A total of 292 samples were technically unsatisfactory. The mean age of those tested was 64 years (49–86); 6513 samples were analysed at the Central Clinical Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology (NIO), Budapest. The very sensitive colour reaction was positive in 1892 cases (29% of all tested); in the second phase, the immunochemical Hgb and Alb reactions were positive (5.8% of all tests performed). The test-positive cases were referred for colonoscopic assessment to the NIO. Colonoscopy was performed on 243 persons (65% of those referred; the rest was lost for the follow-up). Colorectal cancer was detected and histologically confirmed in 12 cases (5% of all test positives); six out of 12 cancer cases proved to be in early stage (Dukes A). In additional 59 cases (20%), adenomatous polyps were found. In the 2-year follow-up period, seven cancer cases were diagnosed among those test-positive cases who rejected the endoscopic assessment. The parallel demonstration of the two proteins significantly enhanced the detectability of colorectal cancer.
We are convinced that, at present, regular screening of population at average risk, using the combined immunological FOBT as screening tool, is the most promising way of reducing the colorectal cancer burden, one of the leading causes of cancer death in most of the developed countries worldwide.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Cole SR, Young GP (1999) Dietary restriction impairs compliance with FOB screening for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 116: A391
Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MHE, Moss SM, Amar SA, Balfour TW, James PD, Mangham CM (1996) Randomised controlled trial of feacal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 348: 1472–1477
Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Soondergaard O (1996) Randomised study for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 348: 1467–1471
Levin B, Brooks D, Smith RA, Stone A (2003) Emerging technologies in screening for colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 53: 44–55
Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman M, Ederer F (1993) Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med 328: 1365–1371
Mendel JS, Church TR, Ederer F, Bond JH (1999) Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst 434–437
Nakajima M, Saito H, Soma Y, Sobue T, Tanaka M, Munakata A (2003) Prevention of advanced colorectal cancer by screening using the immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a case–control study. Br J Cancer 89: 23–28
Ottó Sz, Eckhardt S (2000) Early detection for colorectal cancer: new aspects in fecal occult blood screening. J Surg Oncol 75: 220–226
Ottó Sz, Német M (1996) Screening for colorectal cancer with an immunological feacal blood test: 2-year follow-up. Br J Surg 83: 1480 (letter)
Ottó Sz, Németh M (1993) Double immunochemical screening test (hemoglobin and albumin) for the detection of occult intestinal bleeding. J Clin Lab Anal 7: 301–306
Ottó Sz, Németh M, Kocsis G (1995) Laboratory study on occult gastrointestinal bleedings: differential diagnostic method for the parallel study of intact and fragmented haemoglobin. J Clin Lab Anal 9: 47–51
Saito H, Soma Y, Koeda J, Wada T, Kawaguchi H, Sobue T, Aisawa T, Yoshida Y (1995) Reduction in risk of mortality from colorectal cancer by fecal occult blood screening with immunochemical haemagglutination test. A case–control study. Int J Cancer 61: 465–469
St John DJB, Young GP, Alexeyeff MA, Deacon MC, Cuthbertson AM, Macrae FA, Penfold JCB (1993) Evaluation of new occult blood tests for detection of colorectal neoplasm. Gastroenterology 104: 1661–1668
Walsh JME, Terdiman JP (2003a) Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review. JAMA 289: 1288–1296
Walsh JME, Terdiman JP (2003b) Colorectal cancer screening: clinical application. JAMA 289: 1297–1302
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Ottó, S., Döbrössy, L. Screening for colorectal cancer with immunological FOBT. Br J Cancer 90, 1871–1872 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601798
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601798