Sir
We read with interest the publication by de Wit et al (2001) that there may be effective cross-over to granisetron after failure on ondansetron; both are selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, a class of drugs considered the ‘gold-standard’ antiemetic agents for the control of emesis in cancer patients undergoing chemo- and radiotherapy. While we support the outcome that granisetron demonstrates superior efficacy to ondansetron, an effect that has been previously reported by Terrey and Aapro (1996), we have some concerns about the study design and the authors' interpretation of the results.
Firstly, from the outset this study favours granisetron. We recognise that the trial of de Wit et al (2001) involved only a small number of patients (n=40), however, for the study to be a balanced cross-over design, patients should have been selected from a background of failure on both ondansetron and granisetron with previous chemotherapy cycles. Moreover, the authors fail to discuss the possibility of a psychological bias toward the introduction of the ‘new’ drug. Psychological factors can influence treatment success and are known to be associated with anticipatory nausea and vomiting, a negative phenomenon that can have potentially disabling effects on patients undergoing successive chemotherapy cycles. Conversely, there may be positive psychological elements benefiting the patient – the design of this trial does not control for this effect. In double-blind trials in which patients fail on one antiemetic treatment and then go on to receive the antiemetic in subsequent cycles, anticipation of a switch in therapy may be enough to demonstrate an improved response.
Despite its importance to the interpretation of the study results, de Wit et al (2001) have made no reference to the longer duration of action of granisetron vs ondansetron, nor the pharmacodynamic properties of the two agents. Compelling data accumulated from cutaneous flare experiments in human volunteers demonstrate that, following a single infusion of granisetron, 40 μg kg−1, the 5-HT3 receptor-mediated axon flare reflex is significantly reduced for at least 24 h (Cooper et al, 1988; Upward et al, 1990). This contrasts with a 2.6-fold shorter duration of action after infusion with ondansetron, 8 and 16 mg (Sweetland et al, 1992) and is further supported by the longer plasma half-life of granisetron (about 10 h; Carmichael et al, 1989) compared with ondansetron (about 3.8 h; Roila and Del Favero, 1995). Furthermore, granisetron differs from the competitive antagonist ondansetron in that it displays insurmountable antagonism at vagal afferent 5-HT3 receptors (Newberry et al, 1993), and it is this property that is thought to underlie the phenomenon that its pharmacodynamic half-life far exceeds its plasma half-life.
The authors fail to acknowledge further important data in their discussion. The two chemotherapeutic agents administered in this study, cisplatin (>=50 mg m−2) and cyclophosphamide (>=500 mg m−2), differ in their emetogenic potential as well as the time of onset of their emetic action (Doherty, 1999) (Table 1). While de Wit et al (2001) report complete protection following cisplatin-based chemotherapy in two out of seven patients receiving granisetron and none out of six patients receiving ondansetron, the principal difference between the efficacy of ondansetron and granisetron in this study was following cyclophosphamide-based therapy. Fifty-eight per cent of patients receiving cyclophosphamide experienced complete protection of emesis following a single dose of granisetron, compared with 7% following a single dose of ondansetron; the later onset of emesis following cyclophosphamide must favour the longer duration of antiemetic effect of granisetron.
Additionally, de Wit et al (2001) state that, ‘there are no data to support the use of higher doses of the same 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in patients failing the recommended dosage,’ citing Gandara et al (1998). However, a dose-related response (P<0.001) for oral dolasetron has been shown between doses of 25 and 200 mg (complete response rates 60.5 and 76.3% for 100 and 200 mg dolasetron, respectively; Fauser et al, 1996), despite a recommended dosage for the agent of 100 mg. Similar dose-related effects have also been reported with ondansetron. For example, a Phase I study comparing three doses of intravenous ondansetron t.d.s. (0.015, 0.15 and 0.3 mg kg−1) indicated a trend towards increased efficacy with higher doses (complete response rates were 15, 46 and 58% respectively), though only the 0.015 mg kg−1 dose was shown to be significantly different from the other dose levels (Grunberg, 1992). Further studies have reported significantly superior efficacy with a single dose on ondansetron, 32 mg, compared with a single 8 mg dose (Beck et al, 1992; Tsavaris et al, 2001). Moreover, studies comparing granisetron, 40 and 160 μg kg−1, show a trend towards increased efficacy at the higher dose (Smith, 1993; Soukop, 1994); 24 h after administration of chemotherapeutic agents, 81% of granisetron, 160 mcg kg−1, were emesis-free compared with 75% receiving granisetron 40 μg kg−1 (Smith, 1993). In addition, patients refractory to other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have been shown to respond well to granisetron, at doses that are higher than generally used, in subsequent chemotherapy cycles (Carmichael et al, 1998).
In conclusion, the effective ‘switch’ to granisetron in this study may, therefore, be due to a number of factors, but is likely to be attributable primarily to the longer duration of action of granisetron compared with ondansetron rather than the lack of cross resistance between 5-HT3 receptor antagonists.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Beck TM, Hesketh PJ, Madajewicz S, Navari RM, Pendergrass K, Lester EP, Kish JA, Murphy WK, Hainsworth JD, Gandara DR (1992) Stratified, randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron administered as a multiple-dose regimen versus two single-dose regimens in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. J Clin Oncol 10: 12 1969–1975
Carmichael J, Cantwell BMJ, Edwards CM, Zussman BD, Thompson S, Rapeport WG, Harris AL (1989) A pharmacokinetic study of granisetron (BRL 43694A), a selective 5-HT3, receptor antagonist: correlation with anti-emetic response. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 24: 45–59
Carmichael J, Keizer HJ, Cupissol D, Milliez J, Scheidel P, Schindler AE (1998) Use of granisetron in patients refractory to previous treatment with antiemetics. Anti-Cancer Drugs 9: 381–385
Cooper SM, Arnold BDC, Rapeport WG (1988) Inhibition of 5-HT induced axon-reflex flares by BRL 43694, a novel 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Br J Clin Pharmacol 25: 106P–107P
de Wit R, de Boer AC, Linden GHM, Stoter G, Sparreboom A, Verweij J (2001) Effective cross-over to granisetron after failure to ondansetron, a randomized double blind study in patients failing ondansetron plus dexamethasone during the first 24 hours following highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 85: 1099–1101
Doherty KM (1999) Closing the gap in prophylactic antiemetic therapy: patient factors in calculating the emetogenic potential of chemotherapy. Clin J Oncol Nurs 3: 113–119
Fauser AA, Duclos B, Chemaissani A, Del Favero A, Cognetti F, Diaz-Rubio E, Funes H, Conte PF, Dressler H (1996) Therapeutic equivalence of single oral doses of dolasetron mesilate and multiple doses of ondansetron for the prevention of emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. European Dolasetron Comparative Study Group. Eur J Cancer 32A: 1523–1529
Gandara DR, Roila F, Warr D, Edelman MJ, Perez EA, Gralla RJ (1998) Consensus proposal for 5-HT3 antagonists in the prevention of acute emesis related to highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Dose, schedule, and route of administration. Support Care Cancer 6: 237–243
Grunberg SM (1992) Phase I and other dose-ranging studies of ondansetron. Semin Oncol 19: 16–22
Newberry NR, Watkins CJ, Sprosen TS, Blackburn TP, Grahame-Smith DG, Leslie RA (1993) BRL 46470 potently antagonizes neural responses activated by 5-HT3 receptors. Neuropharmacology 32: 729–735
Roila F, Del Favero A (1995) Ondansetron clinical pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet 29: 95–109
Smith IE (1993) A dose-finding study of granisetron, a novel antiemetic, in patients receiving cytostatic chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 119: 350–354
Soukop M (1994) A dose-finding study of granisetron, a novel antiemetic, in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Support Care Cancer 2: 177–183
Sweetland J, Lettis S, Fowler PA, Thomas M (1992) Duration of the inhibitory effect of intravenous ondansetron on intradermal 5-HT-induced flare. Br J Clin Pharmacol 33: 565P
Terrey J-P, Aapro MS (1996) The activity of granisetron in patients who had previously failed ondansetron antiemetic therapy. Eur J Clin Res 8: 281–288
Tsavaris N, Kosmas CH, Vadiaka M, Kontos A, Katsorida M, Dimitrakopoulos A, Zerai A, Koufos CH (2001) Efficacy of ondansetron treatment for acute emesis with different dosing schedules 8 vs 32 mg. A randomized study. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 20: 1 29–34
Upward JW, Arnold BDC, Link C, Pierce DM, Allen A, Tasker TCG (1990) The clinical pharmacology of granisetron (BRL 43694), a novel specific 5-HT3 antagonist. Eur J Cancer 26: suppl 1 S12–S15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Blower, P., Aapro, M. Granisetron vs ondansetron: is it a question of duration of 5-HT3 receptor blockade?. Br J Cancer 86, 1662–1663 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600313
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600313
This article is cited by
-
Is there a pharmacological basis for differences in 5-HT3-receptor antagonist efficacy in refractory patients?
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2005)