Sir
In these previous studies we provided a simple method to label Caelyx by incubation of 5 mg of the ready-to-use solution with 20 mCi of 99mTc-DTPA. Instant thin layer chromatography (ITLC) suggested an 80% labelling (Koukourakis et al, 1999), which is also a result found by Dr Laverman and colleagues. As additional more sophisticated analysis, performed by the later research group, failed to confirm this finding, it was suggested that the tumour and body imaging obtained in our studies is rather a result of 99mTc-DTPA and not of labelled liposomes.
99mTc-DTPA is currently used in the evaluation of renal function, and as well noted by Dr Laverman, this is rapidly cleared from the kidneys. Two hours following injection, the imaging quality of kidneys is really poor. 99mTc-DTPA can give good images of gliomas, probably as a result of the high tumour vascularization or even of the disrupted blood–brain barrier, which allows a net contrast between normal and abnormal brain. However, imaging of other tumours with 99mTc-DTPA is questionable.
We believe that the best answer to whether our simple labelling technique labels Caelyx indeed, comes from the clinical practice. The patterns and quality of imaging using 99mTc-DTPA-Caelyx has been assessed in more than 30 non-small cell lung cancer patients comparatively with 99mTc-sestamibi (Koukourakis et al, 1997), while in five of them imaging with simple 99mTc-DTPA was also performed at 2 h post-injection. The patterns of normal tissue imaging using the three radio-pharmaceuticals was entirely different. The quality of tumour images obtained with sestamibi and labelled-Caelyx was very good, while in some cases liposomal imaging was even better. Tumour imaging with 99mTc-DTPA was of unacceptably poor quality, and rather absent in 3 out of 5 cases. Similar comparison of the three imaging procedures in patients with head and neck cancer showed an excellent imaging using labelled-Caelyx and 99mTc-sestamibi, while using 99mTc-DTPA the imaging was questionable especially at 2 h post-injection (Figure 1). The superiority of liposomal imaging over sestamibi was confirmed in more than 10 glioma patients. Indeed, lesions of some mm in dimensions were perfectly scanned using 99mTc-DTPA-Caelyx (Koukourakis et al, 2000a), which is rarely seen with sestamibi.
We, therefore, have to cope with a discrepancy between the clinical imaging and the 1% labelling suggested by Dr Laverman. 99mTc-DTPA is a hydrophilic compound and, as well stressed by Dr Laverman and colleagues, it is difficult to explain how a hydrophilic radiotracer can pass through the lipid layer and become entrapped in the liposomes. There are two possibilities: (a) our labelling procedure is not efficient and 99mTc-DTPA scanning is the cheapest, still the best, imaging procedure for tumours (which is not true according to ours and the general experience); (b) 99mTc-DTPA labels liposomes without passing through the lipid layer. Caelyx is a pegylated liposome with a water soluble polyethylen-glycol coat. 99mTc-DTPA could be entrapped in this layer and label liposomes without necessitating internalization. The radio-chemical elaboration of labelled-PEG-liposomes on Sephadex performed by Dr Laverman could well lead to 99mTc-DTPA dissociation from the PEG-coat, which explains the poor labelling efficiency found.
Simple labelling procedures of liposomal drugs will become of great value within the following years, when multiple liposomal agents will be available. The technique described by Laverman et al (2001) is as simple as ours, while the Indium-oxine labelling allows a better monitoring of the liposome kinetics for at least 3 days after administration. We will certainly incorporate this in current and future projects.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Koukourakis MI, Koukouraki S, Giatromanolaki A, Archimandritis SC, Skarlatos J, Beroukas K, Bizakis JG, Retalis G, Karkavitsas N, Helidonis ES (1999) Liposomal doxorubicin and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 17: 3512–3521
Koukourakis MI, Koukouraki S, Fezoulidis I, Kelekis N, Kyrias G, Archimandritis S, Karkavitsas N (2000a) High intratumoral accumulation of stealth liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx®) in glioblastomas and in metastatic brain tumours. Br J Cancer 83: 1281–1286
Koukourakis MI, Koukouraki S, Giatromanolaki A, Kakolyris S, Georgoulias V, Velidaki A, Archimandritis S, Karkavitsas NN (2000b) High intratumoral accumulation of stealth liposomal doxorubicin in sarcomas rationale for combination with radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 39: 207–211
Koukourakis MI, Koukouraki S, Giatromanolaki A, Skarlatos J, Georgoulias V, Karkavitsas N (1997) Non-small cell lung cancer functional imaging: increased hexakis-2-methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile tumor clearance correlates with resistance to cytotoxic treatment. Clin Cancer Res 3: 749–754
Laverman P, Carstens MG, Boerman OC, Dams ET, Oyen WJ, van Rooijen N, Corstens FH, Storm G (2001) Factors affecting the accelerated blood clearance of PEG-liposomes upon repeated injection. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298: 607–612
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Koukourakis, M. Reply: 99mTc-labelled Stealth liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx®) in glioblastomas and metastatic brain tumours. Br J Cancer 86, 660–661 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600094
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600094