Commentary

Direct pulp capping involves the application of a dental material to the exposed pulp in an attempt to preserve its vitality. High clinical success rates have been reported but histological examination has shown chronic inflammation under many pulp caps and diminished success rates.

Carious exposure of the pulp is by far the most common reason for pulp capping although it is also used to treat mechanical and traumatic exposures. The procedure can be carried out with or without partial removal of the pulp (pulpotomy).

There are various materials in routine use for pulp capping, the aim being to induce reparative dentinogenesis across the exposed pulp. Calcium hydroxide is generally accepted as the material of choice. Direct bonding of pulp exposure has been advocated by numerous researchers although this remains controversial.1,2 More recently, excellent results have been reported using mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA).3

The aim of the review by Olsson et al. was to evaluate the available evidence on the formation of a hard tissue barrier after pulp capping. The authors searched Medline via PubMed and the CENTRAL database, along with a search by hand of reference lists from identified studies. The Ovid-Medline database, however, did not appear to have been included and research that was not published in the English language was excluded from the search. As a consequence, pertinent research may have been omitted from this systematic review.

Only 21 studies met the inclusion criteria from a total of 107 studies identified from the literature search. Of the 21 studies, 20 provided low-quality evidence with only one deemed to be of moderate quality: none had the highest level of evidence. Various materials were used as the pulp-capping agent in the studies, including calcium hydroxide, bonding agents and other materials (including MTA). In addition, the heterogeneity between studies was substantial and, as a result, the authors felt it inappropriate to perform a meta-analysis.

Overall, the total evidence grade was insufficient but this does not necessarily imply that pulp capping has no effect or should not be used. It merely highlights the need for high-quality randomised controlled trials in future research. In conclusion, based on current evidence, it seems that calcium hydroxide materials have the most consistent ability to form a hard tissue barrier and remain the material of choice.

Practice points

Calcium hydroxide materials remain an effective method of pulp capping and may induce a hard tissue barrier following exposure of the pulp in non-carious teeth.

Newer materials such as MTA show promising results but more research is required before it is used as an alternative to calcium hydroxide.