Abstract
The limiting factor for radiation (RT) dose-escalation is normal tissue toxicity. In dose-escalation studies, it is important to determine the factors associated with toxicity and the length of follow-up period after which a particular RT dose is considered safe.
We analyzed 449 prostate cancer patients treated with RT at our institution and followed for a median of 27 months. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointerological (GI) complications were graded and analyzed using three different statistical models. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for factors associated with toxicity.
There was no RTOG grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Only 23 patients (5%) experienced grade 3 toxicity. After treatment, there was an initial rapid decline in the risk of toxicity following treatment, followed by an increase or stabilization of the toxicity with time of follow-up. The breakpoints between the two periods were 2 y (any toxicity) and 1 y (high toxicity) for GU and 9 months (any toxicity, high toxicity) for GI. Age, dose, fraction size, duration of treatment and hospital of treatment emerge as important factors in the probability of developing toxicity.
Our study shows that delivering conventional doses using conformal techniques is associated with minimal high-grade toxicity. However, even within a narrow dose range and fraction size used, differences do emerge which should lead one to be cautious in extending the results of dose escalation study to the community practice without a sufficient follow-up.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Leibel SA, Zelefsky ML, Kutcher GJ, Burman CM, Kelson S, Fuks Z . Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in localized carcinoma of the prostate; Interim report of a phase I dose-escalation study J Urol 1994 152: 1792–1798
Zelefsky ML, Leibel SA, Kutcher GJ, Kelson S, Ling CC, Fuks Z . The feasibility of dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with prostatic carcinoma Cancer Sci Am 1995 1: 42–50
Hanks GE, Hanlon AL, Schultheiss TE, Freedman G, Hunt M, Pinover W, Movsas B . Conformal external beam treatment of prostate cancer Urology 1997 50: 87–92
Hanks GE, Lee WR, Hanlon AL, Hunt M, Kaplan E, Epstein BE, Schultheiss TE . Conformal technique dose escalation for prostate cancer: improved cancer control with higher doses in patients with pretreatment PSA>10 ngm/ml Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996 35: 861–868
Hanks GE, Schultheiss TE, Hanlon AL, Hunt M, Lee WR, Epstein BE, Coia LR . Optimization of conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer: report of a dose escalation study Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997 37: 543–550
Lim AJ, Brandon AH, Fiedler J, Brickman AL, Boyer CI, Raub WA, Soloway MS . Quality of life: radical prostatectomy vs radiation therapy for prostate cancer J Urol 1995 154: 1420–1425
Folwer FJ, Barry MJ, Lu-Yau G, Wasson JH, Lin Bin . Outcomes of external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a study of Medicare beneficiaries in three Surveyance, epidemiology, and End Results areas J Clin Oncol 1996 14: 2258–2265
Klienbaum DG . Survival Analysis Springer: New York 1996 p 4
Low NN, Vijayakumar S, Rosenberg I, Rubin S, Virudachalam R, Spelbring DR, Chen GT . Beam's eye view based prostate treatment planning: is it useful? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990 19: 759–768
Vijayakumar S, Chen GT, Low NN, Myrianthopoulos L, Chiru P, Rosenberg I . Beam's eye view-based radiation therapy description of methods Radiographics 1992 12: 961–968
Vijayakumar S, Hellman S . Advances in radiation oncology Lancet 1997 349: (Suppl 2) S111–S113
Yang FE, Chen GT, Ray P, Vaida F, Chiru P, Hamilton RJ, Spelbring D, Abellera M, Vijayakumar S . The potential for normal tissue dose reduction with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in conformal treatment planning for stage C prostate cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995 33: 1009–1017
Pilepich MV, Caplan R, Byhardt RW, Lawton CA, Gallagher MJ, Mesic JB, Hanks GE, Coughlin CT, Porter A . Phase III trial of androgen suppression using Goserelin in unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy—report of RTOG 85-31 J Clin Oncol 1997 15: 1013–1021
Bolla M, Gonzalez D, Warde P, Dubois LB, Miri-manoff RO, Storme G, Bernier J, Kuten A, Sternberg C, Gil T, Collette L, Pierart M . Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin New Engl J Med 1997 337: 295–300
Vijayakumida F, Weichselbaum R, Hellman S . Race and the Will Rogers phenomenon in prostate cancer Cancer J Sci Am 1998 4: 27–34
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abdalla, I., Ignacio, L., Vaida, F. et al. Evolution of toxicity after conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 5, 296–303 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500608
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500608
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Long-term findings of rectal endoscopy and rectal bleeding after moderately hypofractionated, intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Time course of late rectal toxicity after radiation therapy for prostate cancer
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2010)
-
Estimating the risk of long-term erectile, urinary and bowel symptoms resulting from prostate cancer treatment
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2006)