Dear Editor
The activity of many factors involved in the control of DNA replication is regulated by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events.1 In this respect, we have previously investigated the modulation of human DNA ligase I (hLigI), which is the activity involved in joining of Okazaki fragments during lagging strand synthesis.2 According to its function, the enzyme is a constituent of the replication factories that assemble during S-phase3 and plays also a role in DNA repair.4,5 We have previously shown that the recruitment of hLigI to replication factories is mediated by a short sequence referred as RFTS (Replication Factory Targeting Sequence) that corresponds to an evolutionary conserved PCNA binding site.6 The interaction with PCNA affects also the phosphorylation status of Ser66 of hLigI during the cell cycle.7 More recently, we have observed that in HeLa cells etoposide-induced double strand breaks (DSBs) cause the relocalization of hLigI, PCNA and replication protein-A (RPA), leading to the dispersal of replication factories and to the formation of DNA repair foci. Reorganization of the subnuclear compartments was accompanied by a transient phosphorylation of the p32 subunit of RPA and by a transient dephosphorylation of Ser66 on hLigI.8 Taken together, these data indicate that during cell cycle and DNA repair the activity of hLigI is strictly regulated by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation.
To investigate if the phosphorylation status of human DNA ligase I could be modulated also during the apoptotic cell death, exponentially growing HL60 cells were incubated for increasing times with 68 μM etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor which affects DNA replication and activates the apoptotic pathway. The fate of hLigI was followed by two mAbs characterized in our laboratory, the 1A4 clone that is specific for the hLigI phosphorylated on Ser66, and the 2B1 clone, which recognizes the antigen irrespectively of its phosphorylation status. Western blot analysis with 2B1 revealed in untreated cells the expected band of 125 kDa corresponding to hLigI (Figure 1A, lane 1). Etoposide treatment induced a progressive increase in the electrophoretic mobility of the protein, as revealed by the shift in the apparent molecular weight of the enzyme (lanes 2–5, corresponding to cells treated with 68 μM etoposide for 1, 2, 4 and 6 h, respectively), thus indicating that prolonged etoposide treatment caused hLigI dephosphorylation. This evidence was confirmed by the 1A4 mAb directed to hLigI phosphorylated on Ser66. Indeed, a sudden decrease in the level of the phosphorylated protein was visible in cells treated with etoposide for 4 and 6 h (Figure 1B, lanes 4 and 5). This finding is in agreement with our previous observation on HeLa cells8 and suggests that dephosphorylation of hLigI is a general feature of etoposide-treatment. Since we have previously shown that Ser66 is part of a consensus site for Casein Kinase II (CKII; 7), we investigated if hLigI from apoptotic cells could still be a substrate for this kinase. The immunopurification of hLigI from extracts of cells harvested after a 6 h-treatment and the further phosphorylation with CKII, revealed that hLigI was still a substrate for CKII (Figure 1B, lane 6). The analysis of the level of the catalytic (α) and regulatory (β) subunit of CKII in extracts from HL60 cells treated with etoposide for 1, 2, 4 and 6 h, showed that CKIIα and β were present at comparable levels in untreated and etoposide-treated cells (Figure 1C), thus suggesting that dephosphorylation of hLigI depends on the activation of a phosphatase activity and not on the kinase inactivation. The immunofluorescence analysis of hLigI distribution in apoptotic HL60 cells showed that dephosphorylated hLigI colocalized with the apoptotic bodies (Figure 1D, arrowheads), thus supporting the notion that dephosphorylation increases the affinity of hLigI for chromatin structures.7
To better characterize the cells in which hLigI is dephosphorylated, we monitored a series of apoptotic parameters, including chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation and PARP-1 proteolysis. In cells showing the complete dephosphorylation of hLigI (i.e. after a 4 and 6 h treatment with 68 μM etoposide), we found respectively about 67 and 88% of cells with apoptotic morphology, as revealed by Hoechst staining (Figure 1E). Furthermore, we observed in these samples a massive DNA laddering (Figure 1F) and PARP-1 cleavage (Figure 1G). Altogether, these data indicate that complete dephosphorylation of hLigI occurs in cells in the execution phase of etoposide-induced apoptosis. No evidence for this event was obtained in HeLa cells driven to apoptosis by long-term culture conditions.
Protein dephosphorylation has been a rather neglected aspect of cell death and the timing of dephosphorylation events during apoptosis is still controversial. In line with our results on hLigI in etoposide-treated cells, a change in the degree of phosphorylation of the HMG A1a protein has been shown in advanced apoptotic cells;9 on the contrary, histone H1 subtypes10 and Tau protein11 undergo dephosphorylation early after apoptosis induction by different stimuli, including topoisomerase inhibitors. It has been reported that during apoptosis dephosphorylated RB12 and Tau13 are cleaved by caspases. Under conditions of PARP-1 degradation in etoposide-treated HL60 cells (Figure 1G), we found no evidence of hLigI cleavage. Furthermore, kinase assays revealed that the phosphorylation sites of the protein were conserved (Figure 1B), thus indicating that the structural properties of the enzyme were not affected.
The physiological relevance of protein dephosphorylation during apoptosis is still unknown. As suggested by the observation that the pro-apoptotic protein BAD once dephosphorylated by the serine-threonine phosphatase calcineurin, promotes apoptosis,14 dephosphorylation could be highly regulated within the apoptotic pathway. From our data, it is tempting to speculate that the activation of the DNA damage-induced apoptotic pathway requires signals to abolish cell cycle progression and to inhibit enzymatic activities involved in the maintenance of chromatin structure and in DNA replication. This has been verified for some proteins involved in chromatin dynamics, such as histone H1 subtypes10 and HMG A1a.9 Furthermore, a link between cell cycle arrest and apoptosis has been suggested by the reports on RB dephosphorylation and G1 arrest during apoptosis.15,16 DNA ligase I is phosphorylated in a cell cycle dependent manner and phosphorylation on Ser66 allows to discriminate between a dephosphorylated pre-replicative form and a phosphorylated post-replicative form of the enzyme.7 We hypothesize that dephosphorylation of hLigI and possibly of other replicative enzymes is a hallmark of the inactivation of the DNA replication machinery typical of DNA damaged-apoptotic cells.
References
Boulikas T . 1994 Anticancer Res. 14: 2465–2472
Tomkinson AE, Levin DS . 1997 BioEssays 19: 893–901
Montecucco A et al. 1995 EMBO J. 14: 5379–5386
Barnes DE et al. 1992 Cell 69: 495–504
Montecucco A et al. 1995 Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 962–966
Montecucco A et al. 1998 EMBO J. 17: 3786–3795
Rossi R et al. 1999 EMBO J. 18: 5745–5754
Montecucco A et al. 2001 Mol. Biol. Cell 12: 2109–2118
Diana F et al. 2001 J. Biol. Chem. 276: 11354–11361
Kratzmeier M et al. 2000 J. Biol. Chem. 275: 30478–30486
Mills JC et al. 1998 J. Cell Sci. 111: 625–636
Fattman CL et al. 1998 Cancer Letters 130: 103–113
Canu N et al. 1998 J. Neurosci. 18: 7061–7074
Wang H-G et al. 1999 Science 284: 339–343
Dou QP et al. 1995 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 9019–9023
Chen WD et al. 1997 Oncogene 14: 1243–1248
Donzelli M et al. 1999 Oncogene 18: 439–448
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by a grant from AIRC to AM and from CNR ‘Agenzia 2000’ (Project CNRC00CA18) to GB.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rossi, R., Montecucco, A., Donzelli, M. et al. DNA ligase I is dephosphorylated during the execution step of etoposide-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ 9, 89–90 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400961
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400961
This article is cited by
-
DNA replication: a complex matter
EMBO reports (2003)