Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Scientific Correspondence
  • Published:

Importance of ancestral DNA ages

Abstract

Recent publications consider the age of a common ancestor of samples of human DNA sequences1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. In particular, variation in Y chromosomes has been interpreted by different authors to give very different estimates of the time to the most recent common ancestor of the sample1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. The cause of the differences is that the data are being interpreted by various authors in terms of their preferred models of human demography. The data are so lacking in power that these estimates depend hardly at all on the data, and almost entirely on the demographic model assumed. However, if we knew the demography of early humans, we would have no real interest in the time to the most recent common ancestor of an individual gene, as the time is important only because it tells us about the demography.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Dorit, R. L., Akashi, H. & Gilbert, W. Science 268, 1183–1185 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fu, Y.-X. & Li, W.-H. Science 272, 1356–1357 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donnelly, P., Tavaré, S., Balding, D. J. & Griffiths, R. C. Science 272, 1357–1359 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss, G. & von Haeseler, A. Science 272, 1359–1360 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fu, Y.-X. & Li, W.-H. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 195–199 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dorit, R. L., Akashi, H. & Gilbert, W. Science 272, 1361–1362 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hammer, M. F. Nature 378, 376–378 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Whitfield, L. S., Sulston, J. E. & Goodfellow, P. N. Nature 378, 379–380 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Knight, A. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 4360–4364 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brookfield, J. Importance of ancestral DNA ages. Nature 388, 134 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/40543

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/40543

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing