Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Comparison of a needle-free high-pressure injection system with needle-tipped injection of intracavernosal alprostadil for erectile dysfunction

Abstract

Patients identified from hospital records as using alprostadil injections for erectile dysfunction were invited to take part in this open crossover study. On alternate weeks eight patients were given intracavernosal needle injections and transdermal needle-free injection of alprostadil in a randomized order. Efficacy of injection and associated pain were assessed and compared for the two methods. Pain produced during injection was significantly greater with the needle-free system than with the needle-tipped injection whilst efficacy was significantly less. Bruising was reported in all except one patient following needle-free injection only. Patient ratings of the needle-free injector were significantly lower than ratings for needle-tipped alprostadil delivery and when asked to express a preference, every patient chose the needle-tipped injection over the needle-free device.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leungwattanakij S, Flynn V Jr, Hellstrom WJ . Intracavernosal injection and intraurethral therapy for erectile dysfunction Urol Clin N Am 2001; 28: 343–354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vitezic D . A risk–benefit assessment of sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction Drug Saf 2001; 24: 255–265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pryer JL, Redman B . New therapies and delivery mechanisms for treatment of erectile dysfunction Int J Impot Res 2000; 12: S158–S162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bodner DR, Leffler B, Frost F . The role of intracavernous injection of vasoactive medications for the restoration of erection in spinal cord injured males: a three year follow up Paraplegia 1992; 30: 118–120.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Purvis K, Egdetveit I, Christiansen E . Intracavernosal therapy for erectile failure—impact of treatment and reasons for drop-out and dissatisfaction Int J Impot Res 2000; 12: 131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shabsigh R et al. Intracavernous alprostadil alfadex is more efficacious, better tolerated, and preferred over intraurethral alprostadil plus optional actis: a comparative, randomized, crossover, multicenter study Urology 2000; 55: 109–113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baniel J, Israilov S, Segenreich E, Livne PM . Comparative evaluation of treatments for erectile dysfunction in patients with prostate cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy BJU Int 2001; 88: 58–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brock G, Tu LM, Linet OI . Return of spontaneous erection during long-term intracavernosal alprostadil (Caverject) treatment Urology 2001; 57: 536–541.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Saravia ME, Bush JP . The needless syringe: efficacy of anesthesia and patient preference in child dental patients J Clin Pediatr Dent 1991; 15: 109–112.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper JA, Bromley LM, Baranowski AP, Barker SGE . Evaluation of a needle-free injection system for local anaesthesia prior to venous cannulation Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 247–250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Danowski TS, Sunder JH . Jet injection of insulin during self monitoring of blood glucose Diabetes Care 1978; 1: 27–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Katoulis EC et al. Efficacy of a new needless insulin delivery system monitoring of blood glucose fluctuations and free insulin levels Int J Artif Organs 1989; 12: 333–338.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis HL et al. Direct gene transfer in skeletal muscle: plasmid DNA-based immunization against the hepatitis B virus surface antigen Vaccine 1994; 12: 1503–1509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gramzinski RA et al. Immune responses to a hepatitis B DNA vaccine in Aotus monkeys: comparison of vaccine formulation, route, and method of administration Mol Med 1998; 4: 109–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brodell RT, Bredle DL . The treatment of palmar and plantar warts using natural alpha interferon and a needless injector Dermatol Surg 1995; 21: 210–212.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Seyam RM et al. Evaluation of a no-needle penile injector: a preliminary study evaluating tissue penetration and its hemodynamic consequences in the rat Urology 1997; 50: 994–998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gheorghiu D, Godschalk M, Gheorghiu S, Mulligan T . Slow injection of prostaglandin E1 decreases associated penile pain Urology 1996; 47: 903–904.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Verrips GH et al. Psychological responses to the needle-free Medi-Jector or the multidose. Disetronic injection pen in human growth hormone therapy Acta Paediatr 1998; 87: 154–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L M Harding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harding, L., Adeniyi, A., Everson, R. et al. Comparison of a needle-free high-pressure injection system with needle-tipped injection of intracavernosal alprostadil for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 14, 498–501 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900916

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900916

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links