Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Fitness costs of resource overlap among coexisting bird species

Abstract

NATURAL selection is thought to favour differences in resource use (resource partitioning) among coexisting species because overlap is assumed to incur fitness costs1–5. However, studies of resource partitioning in animal systems in the wild have ignored or had difficulty demonstrating fitness costs of overlap, particularly at the level of individuals. Here I report manipulative and observational tests demonstrating individual-level fitness costs of resource overlap. Based on an extensive data set (2,400 experimental nests and 1,408 natural nests), I show that seven coexisting bird species differ in nesting microhabitats, and that overlap in use of nest sites increases nest predation rates (fitness costs). Moreover, predation risk is greater for individuals within species that use nest sites that overlap with coexisting species. Such intraspecific variation can allow natural selection to shape species differences and patterns of species coexistence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lack, D. Ecological Isolation in Birds (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schoener, T. W. Science 185, 27–39 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schoener, T. W. in Community Ecology (eds Kikkawa, J. & Anderson, D. J.) 91–126 (Blackwell Scientific, Melbourne, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gause, G. F. The Struggle for Existence (Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1934).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Hutchinson, G. E. 1957 Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 22, 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ricklefs, R. E. & O'Rourke, K. Evolution 29, 313–324 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holt, R. D. Theor. Populat. Biol. 12, 197–229 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Holt, R. D. Am. Nat. 124, 377–406 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeffries, J. J. & Lawton, J. H. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 23, 269–286 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin, T. E. BioScience 43, 523–532 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin, T. E. Evol. Ecol. 2, 37–50 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin, T. E. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 2196–2199 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ricklefs, R. E. Smithson. Contr. Zool. 9, 1–48 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin, T. E. Am. Nat. 141, 897–913 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin, T. E. Ecol. Monogr. 65, 101–127 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin, T. E. & Roper, J. J. Condor 90, 51–57 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin, T. E. Ecology 68, 74–84 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Solomon, E. P., Berg, L. R., Martin, D. W. & Villee, C. Biology (Saunders College Publishing, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brewer, R. The Science of Ecology (Saunders College Publishing, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Strickberger, M. W. Evolution (Jones & Bartlett, Boston, MA, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  21. MacArthur, R. H. Ecology 39, 599–619 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. James, F. C., Johnston, R. F., Wamer, N. O., Niemi, G. J. & Boecklen, W. J. Am. Nat. 124, 17–47 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hensler, G. L. & Nichols, J. D. Wilson Bull. 93, 42–53 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hines, J. E. & Sauer, J. R. U. S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Fish. Wildl. Tech. Rep. Vol. 24 (1989).

  25. Martin, T. E. & Geupel, G. R. J. Fld Orn. 64, 507–519 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sauer, J. R. & Williams, B. K. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 53, 137–142 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, T. Fitness costs of resource overlap among coexisting bird species. Nature 380, 338–340 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/380338a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/380338a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing