Abstract
The gene products of CDH13 and CDH1, H-cadherin and E-cadherin, respectively, play a key role in cell–cell adhesion. Inactivation of the cadherin-mediated cell adhesion system caused by aberrant methylation is a common finding in human cancers, indicating that the CDH13 and CDH1 function as tumor suppressor and invasion suppressor genes. In this study, we analyzed the expression of H-cadherin mRNA and E-cadherin protein in 5 normal pituitary tissues and 69 primary pituitary adenomas including all major types by quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Reduced expression of H-cadherin was detected in 54% (28/52) of pituitary tumors and was significantly associated with tumor aggressiveness (P<0.05). E-cadherin expression was lost in 30% (21 of 69) and significantly reduced in 32% (22 of 69) of tumors. E-cadherin expression was significantly lower in grade II, III, and IV than in grade I adenomas (P=0.015, P=0.029, and P=0.01, respectively). Using methylation-specific PCR (MSP), promoter hypermethylation of CDH13 and CDH1 was detected in 30 and 36% of 69 adenomas, respectively, but not in 5 normal pituitary tissues. Methylation of CDH13 was observed more frequently in invasive adenomas (42%) than in non-invasive adenomas (19%) (P<0.05) and methylation of CDH1 was more frequent in grade IV adenomas compared with grade I adenomas (P<0.05). Methylation of either CDH13 or CDH1 was identified in 35 cases (51%) and was more frequent in grade IV invasive adenomas than in grade I non-invasive adenomas (P<0.05 and P<0.05, respectively). Downregulation of expression was correlated with promoter hypermethylation in CDH13 and CDH1. In conclusion, the tumor-specific downregulation of expression and methylation of CDH13 and CDH1, alone or in combination, may be involved in the development and invasive growth of pituitary adenomas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Pituitary adenomas constitute about 10–15% of intracranial neoplasms. Despite the classification of these tumors as benign, a proportion of them invade surrounding structures including the sphenoid sinus, the cavernous sinus, and even the brain. The pathogenetic mechanisms underlying pituitary adenoma formation and progression remain unclear. Mutations in classic oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) are only rarely found in these tumors.1 Furthermore, the mechanisms responsible for aggressive behavior are also poorly understood.
The gene product of CDH13, namely H-cadherin, is a new unique member of the cadherin superfamily. H-cadherin is anchored to the cell-surface membrane through a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol moiety and lacks the cytoplasmic domain unlike other cadherins such as E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and P-cadherin.2 Recent studies have highlighted the role of CDH13 as a TSG in lung, breast, ovarian, bladder, colorectal, esophageal, gastric, cutaneous, and pancreatic cancers.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Furthermore, downregulation of H-cadherin due to hypermethylation in the promoter region of CDH13 gene appears to be related to the tumorigenesis and invasiveness of these cancers. However, expression of H-cadherin and the methylation status of the CDH13 in pituitary tissue and pituitary adenomas have not been evaluated to date.
E-cadherin, the gene product of CDH1, plays a key role in cell–cell adhesion. Decrease or loss of E-cadherin expression accompanied by CDH1 promoter methylation has been reported in many human cancers.11 In pituitary adenomas, E-cadherin expression might play a variety of roles in different tumor subtypes. Our previous studies showed that the decreased expression of E-cadherin was related to aggressive behavior of prolactinomas and was associated with the formation of fibrous bodies in GH cell adenomas.12, 13 However, methylation status of the CDH1 promoter has not been examined in pituitary adenomas and the relation between E-cadherin expression and invasion by pituitary adenomas is unclear.
Methylation of CpG islands in gene promoter regions is associated with aberrant silencing of transcription as an alternative mechanism for TSG inactivation to gene deletion and mutations. Thus, it is a frequently acquired epigenetic event in the pathogenesis of many human malignancies.14 There is increasing evidence of aberrant promoter methylation of TSGs in the pathogenesis of pituitary adenomas, although some of them are tumor subtype specific.15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 The p16/CDKN2A and RB1 gene methylation with tumor subtype specificity were described in pituitary tumors.15, 16, 17 Preferential loss of death-associated protein kinase (DAPK) expression in invasive pituitary tumors has been reported to be associated with CpG island methylation.18 Methylation-associated gene silencing of the GADD45γ gene, a negative regulator of cell growth, also has been found in human pituitary tumors and a mouse pituitary tumor cell line AtT20.19 Most recently, hypermethylation of RASSF1A and resultant alteration of RASSF1A expression have been detected in pituitary adenomas of all types.20
These results promoted us to investigate the roles of CDH13 and CDH1 in human pituitary tumorigenesis and tumor behavior. In this study, the expression of H-cadherin and E-cadherin was examined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry, respectively. We also examined the frequency of methylation of the CDH13 and CDH1 gene promoters in various types of pituitary adenomas using methylation-specific PCR (MSP). The results were compared to the clinicopathologic parameters of these pituitary adenomas.
Materials and methods
Human Pituitary Tissues and Adenomas
Five normal human adenohypophyses were obtained at autopsy from patients with no evidence of endocrine abnormality at Tokushima University Hospital (Tokushima, Japan); they were examined by hematoxylin–eosin stain and immunocytochemistry to exclude the possibility of incidental tumors. Sixty-nine pituitary adenoma specimens were obtained at the time of surgery at Tokushima University Hospital and Toranomon Hospital (Tokyo, Japan). All samples were frozen and stored at −80°C. Tumors were characterized based on the clinical, radiological, histological, and immunohistochemical features (Table 1).21 There were 45 clinically functional tumors (24 somatotroph adenomas, 2 mammosomatotroph adenomas, 12 lactotroph adenomas, 4 corticotroph adenomas associated with Cushing's disease, and 3 thyrotroph adenomas) and 24 clinically non-functioning adenomas (6 silent corticotroph adenomas, 14 gonadotroph adenomas, 3 silent subtype 3 adenomas and 1 null cell adenoma characterized by immunoreactivity for all anterior pituitary hormones). Tumor size and invasiveness were defined on the basis of preoperative radiological investigations and operative findings and with a modified Hardy's classification.22 Grade I (microadenomas, <1 cm in diameter) and grade II (enclosed macroadenomas with or without suprasellar extension, ≥1 cm in diameter) tumors are defined as non-invasive. Grade III (local invasion of sphenoid and/or cavernous sinus) and grade IV (central nervous system/extracranial spread with or without metastasis) tumors were considered to be invasive. Thus, 69 tumors included 9 tumors of grade I, 27 tumors of grade II, 25 tumors of grade III, and 8 tumors of grade IV (36 non-invasive and 33 invasive adenomas; Table 1). None of the tumors examined in this study had evidence of post-operative recurrence
Total RNA and DNA Extraction
Total RNA and DNA were extracted from fresh frozen tissue samples using the Isogen (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan) and Qiagen DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Stanford, CA, USA), respectively, following the manufacturer's protocol.
Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR Analysis of CDH13 Expression
Since no antibody is available to detect H-cadherin protein expression, we evaluated mRNA expression of CDH13 in 52 pituitary adenomas for which mRNA was available. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of each purified RNA sample using ExScript™ RTase primed with random hexamers (ExScript™ RT-PCR kit; TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan) according to the protocol recommended by the manufacturer. The gene expression levels of CDH13 were then quantified using TaqMan technology on an ABI PRISM 7900HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Forster City, CA, USA). Gene-specific primers and probe of CDH13 (assay ID Hs00169908_m1) were available as TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems). The 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) was amplified and was used as an endogenous control in the quantifications. The real-time PCR was performed in 20 μl reaction containing 1 × premix Ex Taq, 1 × Target Assay Mix, ROX reference dye (TaKaRa), and 1 μl of first-strand cDNA from each sample as a template, using MicroAmp optical 96-well plates covered with MicroAmp optical caps (Applied Biosystems). The thermocycling conditions were 10 s at 95°C, and 40 cycles of 5 s at 95°C and 31 s at 60°C. All qRT-PCR experiments included a no template control and were performed in duplicate. Serial dilutions of cDNA from normal pituitary tissues were amplified in parallel as a control of amplification efficiency within each experiment and for the establishment of a standard curve for relative quantification. Expression of CDH13 mRNA was normalized for 18S rRNA as an internal reference. Relative expression levels were calculated as CDH13/18S rRNA in tumor and normal tissues, respectively.
Immunohistochemical Analysis of E-Cadherin Expression
E-cadherin immunolocalization using the labeled streptavidin–biotin method was performed on sections from representative blocks of paraffin-embedded tissues used for pathology diagnosis. Anti-E-cadherin mouse monoclonal antibody (1:500 dilution; Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY, USA) was used as in our previous study.13 For positive controls, normal epidermis known to be positive for E-cadherin was used. Positive expression of E-cadherin was defined as exclusively membranous staining, as seen in normal epithelial cell of the epidermis. Both the intensity of staining and the percentage of positive tumor cells of E-cadherin in each specimen were considered in semi-quantitative assessment. The distribution of positive staining in the tumor was graded into a five-tier scoring system (0, no staining; 1+, 1–20%; 2+, 20–50%; 3+, 50–80%; and 4+, >80%). The intensity was assigned as weak (0), moderate (1+), or intense (2+). The scores were added together to obtain a total score that can range from 0 to 6. Tumors scoring 1, 2, and 3 were classified as the significantly reduced expression of E-cadherin.
Bisulfite Modification and Methylation-Specific PCR
Genomic DNA was modified by sodium bisulfite treatment and purified using the CpGenome DNA Modification Kit (Intergen, Purchase, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Subsequently, the DNA promoter methylation status of the CDH13 and CDH1 gene was investigated by MSP assay as described previously.23 Both specific primers for methylated and unmethylated promoters and annealing temperature applied were described in previous reports.3, 4, 23 The primers for the methylated CDH13 were (sense) 5′-TCGCGGGGTTCGTTTTTCGC-3′ and (antisense) 5′-GACGTTTTCATTCATACACGCG-3′ (annealing temperature: 57°C, 243 bp product) and for the unmethylated form were (sense) 5′-TTGTGGGGTTTGTTTTTTGT-3′ and (antisense) 5′-AACTTTTCATTCATACACACA-3′ (annealing temperature: 53°C, 242 bp product). Primer sequences for the methylated CDH1 gene were (sense) 5′-TTAGGTTAGAGGGTTATCGCGT-3′ and (antisense) 5′-TAACTAAAAATTCACCTACCGAC-3′ (annealing temperature: 57°C, 116 bp product), and those for the unmethylated CDH1 were (sense) 5′-TAATTTTAGGTTAGAGGGTTATTGT-3′ and (antisense) 5′-CACAACCAATCAACAACACA-3′ (annealing temperature: 55°C, 97 bp product). A pair of positive (CpG universally methylated DNA; Intergen) and negative controls (distilled water) accompanied every amplification reaction. PCR products were separated in a 2% agarose gel or a non-denaturing 6% polyacrylamide gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under ultraviolet illumination. The bisulfite reaction and MSP for all samples were repeated to confirm methylation status. Also some methylated and unmethylated PCR products were randomly selected and purified from the gels for directly sequencing using the NucleoSpin® Extract Kit (Macherey-nagel, Düren, Germany). Cycle sequencing was performed using the BigDye Terminator V1.1 Cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) and the ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).
Statistical Analyses
Using StatView J-4.5 software, Mann–Whitney U-test, χ2 test, and Spearman's correlation coefficient by rank were performed to determine the significance of associations between different variables. The level of statistical significance was P<0.05.
Results
Expression Analysis of CDH13 by qRT-PCR
Using qRT-PCR, 18S rRNA expression was detected in all 52 pituitary adenomas and 5 normal tissues. The median CDH13 mRNA expression level (CDH13/18S rRNA) was 1.2 (range, 1.1–1.3) in normal pituitary tissues. We arbitrarily classified expression levels of less than one-half of this value, that is, CDH13/18S rRNA <0.6, as significant reduction. Loss and significant reduction of CDH13 expression were found in 6 and 22 pituitary adenomas, respectively (Table 2). Reduced expression of CDH13 was detected more frequently in invasive adenomas than in non-invasive adenomas (74 vs 38%, P<0.05; Table 2) and CDH13 mRNA expression was significantly lower in invasive adenomas than in non-invasive adenomas (P=0.037; Figure 1).
Expression Analysis of E-Cadherin
In five normal adenohypophyseal samples, E-cadherin was expressed strongly on cell–cell boundaries of almost all hormone-producing cells, without cytoplasmic and nuclear localization. In pituitary adenomas, positive immunostaining of E-cadherin always showed a membranous pattern of reactivity without cytoplasmic and nuclear localization. The immunostaining results are illustrated in Figure 2.
E-cadherin expression was lost in 30% (21 of 69) tumors, significantly reduced in 32% (22 of 69; including 1+, 6; 2+, 8; and 3+, 8) tumors and slightly reduced or normal in 38% (26 of 69; including 4+, 17; 5+, 7; and 6+, 2) tumors. The expression of E-cadherin was significantly lower in invasive (grades IV and III) and macro- (grade II) than in non-invasive micro- (grade I) tumors (P=0.01, P=0.029, and P=0.015, respectively; Figure 2b). However, there was no significant difference among grades IV, III, and II tumors.
In addition, lost or downregulated E-cadherin expression was found in all of 8 GH cell adenomas with prominent fibrous bodies (0, 4 and ≤3+, 4), but was just detected in 1 of 16 GH cell adenomas without fibrous bodies. Moreover, in prolactinomas, the expression of E-cadherin was lower in male patients than in females; however, the number of cases was small in this study.
Methylation Status of CDH13 and CDH1 in Pituitary Tumors
We used MSP to investigate the promoter methylation of CDH13 and CDH1 in 5 normal pituitary tissues and 69 pituitary adenomas. Representative examples are illustrated in Figure 3. We then analyzed the relationship between CDH13 and CDH1 methylation status and the clinicopathological characteristics of the 69 patients. The results are summarized in Table 1. Hypermethylation of the promoter region of CDH13 and CDH1 was detected in 30% (21 of 69) and 36% (25 of 69) of pituitary adenomas, respectively. However, there was no methylation of either promoter in five normal pituitary tissues, suggesting that CDH13 and CDH1 promoter hypermethylation is tumor specific. Methylated patterns of CDH13 and CDH1 were found in all major types of pituitary adenomas: 25 and 21% of somatotroph adenomas, 33 and 50% of lactotroph adenomas, 25 and 25% of functioning corticotroph adenomas, 50 and 17% of silent corticotroph adenomas, and 14 and 50% of gonadotroph adenomas, respectively. The difference in the frequency of methylation between functional tumors (CDH13, 31%; CDH1, 31%) and non-functional tumors (CDH13, 29%; CDH1, 46%) was not statistically significant.
The methylation of CDH13 was observed more frequently in invasive adenomas (42%) than in non-invasive adenomas (19%) (P<0.05; Table 3). The methylation of CDH1 was more frequent in aggressive grade IV cases compared with grade I cases (P<0.05; Table 3). The methylation of either CDH13 or CDH1 was identified in 35 cases (51%) and was more frequently in grade IV or in invasive than in grade I or in non-invasive adenomas (P<0.05 and P<0.05, respectively; Table 4).
In addition, the specificity of MSP was confirmed by direct sequencing. In unmethylated MSP products, all cytosine nucleotides including those in the CpG islands changed to thymidines as a result of bisulfite modification. However, in methylated MSP products, cytosine nucleotides in the most CpG islands were unchanged (data not shown).
Correlation between Promoter Hypermethylation and Loss or Significant Reduction of Cadherin Expression
Five normal pituitary tissues with unmethylated alleles of CDH13 and CDH1 showed high levels of CDH13 mRNA expression and strong expression of E-cadherin protein.
In 21 of 36 (58%) unmethylated tumors, CDH13 mRNA levels were within the normal range. In contrast, CDH13 mRNA was not detected or significantly reduced in 13 of 16 (81%) tumors with methylated CDH13 promoters. There was a significant correlation between hypermethylation of the CDH13 promoter and abnormal expression of CDH13 (P<0.005; Table 5). Similarly, E-cadherin expression was lost or significantly reduced in 22 of 25 (88%) methylated tumors. On the other hand, 23 of 44 (52%) unmethylated tumors showed strong E-cadherin expression. CDH1 promoter hypermethylation was significantly correlated with loss or downregulation of E-cadherin protein expression (P<0.0005; Table 5). However, these correlations were not completely consistent (Table 5). These findings suggested that silencing of the CDH13 and CDH1 genes can be caused not only by promoter methylation but also by other inactivating mechanisms. Unmethylated bands were found in almost all tumor tissues examined. These unmethylated alleles may be due to contaminated non-tumorous cells or tumor cells without epigenetic change and hemi-methylated tumor cells.
Discussion
Cell adhesion molecules, initially believed to account merely for the mechanical stability of cell–cell interactions, are now known to participate in most fundamental cell activities including proliferation, differentiation, mitogenesis, and apoptosis.24 Changes in cell–cell and cell–matrix adhesion accompany the transition from benign tumor to invasive, malignant cancer and the subsequent metastatic dissemination of tumor cells.24 Aberrant expression of H-cadherin and E-cadherin caused by CDH13 and CDH1 promoter hypermethylation has been reported in a variety of tumors and their effect on tumorigenesis and invasiveness has been elucidated.3, 4, 11 In the current study, decreased mRNA expression of CDH13 was detected in 54% (28/52) of pituitary tumor samples; E-cadherin protein expression was lost in 21 (30%) tumors and significantly reduced in 22 (32%) tumors. In addition, tumor-specific hypermethylation of CDH13 and CDH1 was detected in 30 and 36% of pituitary adenomas including all major types and in all tumor stages, respectively. Moreover, loss and downregulated expression of CDH13 mRNA and E-cadherin protein were significantly associated with hypermethylation of CDH13 and CDH1, respectively. Thus, our data, along with previous studies,15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 suggest that epigenetic alterations are common hallmarks of pituitary tumorigenesis. The aberrant expression of H-cadherin and E-cadherin and their DNA promoter hypermethylation may play an important role in pituitary tumor pathogenesis.
Invasiveness is regarded as one of the most salient determinants of surgical curability because it can limit surgical resection and lead to tumor regrowth.25 Invasive adenomas are also believed to represent a biologically intermediate stage in tumor progression along the continuum from benign adenomas to carcinomas.25 Understanding the biological basis of tumor invasion is crucial for developing new adjuvant treatment and enhancing the outcome of patients with aggressive pituitary tumors. Recent studies have described overexpression of two proto-oncogenes, pituitary tumor transforming gene (PTTG) and pituitary tumor-derived fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (ptd-FGFR4), and matrix metalloproteinase-9, as associated with aggressive behavior in pituitary tumors.26, 27, 28
Because cell discohesiveness and detachment are important for tumor invasiveness, loss or downregulated expression of H-cadherin and E-cadherin may facilitate tumor invasion.2, 29, 30 Furthermore, E-cadherin also has a growth suppressor function by inducing cell-cycle arrest via upregulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27.31
In this study, reduced expression of the CDH13 gene was also associated with tumor aggressiveness (84% invasive cases vs 38% non-invasive cases in qRT-PCR analysis). Moreover, methylation of CDH13 was observed more frequently in invasive adenomas (42%) than in non-invasive adenomas (19%) and was associated with high grade (grade IV (50%) vs grade I (11%)). Loss or significantly reduced E-cadherin expression was a frequent event (62%) in pituitary adenomas of all major types and correlated with tumor size and invasion. Methylation of CDH1 was frequently found in more aggressive grade IV cases compared with grade I cases. These findings suggest that downregulated H-cadherin and E-cadherin expression and CDH13 and CDH1 gene hypermethylation may relate to invasive behavior in pituitary adenomas. E-cadherin may also play important roles in tumor proliferation.
Interestingly, promoter methylation of both CDH13 and CDH1 genes was detected in 11 cases, all of them representing large invasive tumors of high stage (grades II, III, and IV). Such cases were most frequent among grade IV or invasive tumors than in other grades or in non-invasive adenomas. Our findings suggest that concomitant methylation of CDH13 and CDH1 genes may be involved in pituitary tumor progression, as is the case in bladder, lung, gallbladder, and colorectal carcinoma.6, 32, 33, 34
Many studies have shown that hypermethylation is a common mechanism of silencing the CDH13 and CDH1 genes. To address more fully these correlations, we have tried to quantitate the methylated alleles and determine the density of methylated CpG molecules in these genes using combined bisulfite restriction analysis (COBRA) and bisulfite sequencing20 (data not shown). Unexpectedly, we detected hypermethylation pattern of CDH13 and CDH1 by COBRA and bisulfite sequencing only in a few samples, which had a hypermethylation pattern detected by MSP. This discrepancy resulting from different methods has been reported in other tumors and has been widely discussed.35, 36 MSP can detect 1 methylated allele in 1000 unmethylated alleles.23 In contrast, using the bisulfite sequencing method, low numbers of methylated alleles (<25%) may be missed.23 However, our data indicate that hypermethylation of CDH13 and CDH1 gene promoter represents at least one mechanism that results in downregulation of E-cadherin and H-cadherin in pituitary adenomas. Other mechanisms may be implicated as well. Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 16q24.2–3 can cause downregulation of CDH13 gene expression.2 Mutation of the CDH1 gene can lead to the expression of a non-functional protein.11 The binding of the transcription factor Snail and/or Slug to E2 boxes in the CDH1 promoter results in gene silencing.37 Dysadherin interferes with E-cadherin function by downregulation of protein levels without affecting mRNA levels.38 The stimulation of epidermal growth factor receptor also has been proposed for E-cadherin downregulation.39 Future investigations are required to identify whether these mechanisms are active in pituitary adenomas.
In conclusion, we demonstrate decreased expression of H-cadherin and E-cadherin in about half of pituitary adenomas and loss of these adhesion molecules is associated with tumor aggressiveness. The methylation status of CDH13 and CDH1, alone or in combination, is also related to invasive tumor behavior. Decreased expression of CDH13 and CDH1 is associated with aberrant methylation, but other mechanisms also may be implicated in downregulation of gene expression. Our results strongly suggest that silencing of the CDH13 and CDH1 genes may play an important role in the pathogenesis of pituitary adenomas and may be reliable predictor of tumor aggressiveness. Future studies will be required to identify the biological effects of silencing of these genes in pituitary tumorigenesis and invasion.
References
Asa SL, Ezzat S . The pathogenesis of pituitary tumors. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:836–849.
Lee SW . H-cadherin, a novel cadherin with growth inhibitory functions and diminished expression in human breast cancer. Nat Med 1996;2:776–782.
Sato M, Mori Y, Sakurada A, et al. H-cadherin (CDH13) gene is inactivated in human lung cancer. Hum Genet 1998;103:96–101.
Toyooka KO, Toyooka S, Virmani AK, et al. Loss of expression and aberrant methylation of the CDH13 (H-cadherin) gene in breast and lung carcinomas. Cancer Res 2001;61:4556–4560.
Kawakami M, Staub J, Cliby W, et al. Involvement of H-cadherin (CDH13) on 16q in the region of frequent deletion in ovarian cancer. Int J Oncol 1999;15:715–720.
Maruyama R, Toyooka S, Toyooka KO, et al. Aberrant promoter methylation profile of bladder cancer and its relationship to clinicopathological features. Cancer Res 2001;61:8659–8663.
Toyooka S, Toyooka KO, Harada K, et al. Aberrant methylation of the CDH13 (H-cadherin) promoter region in colorectal cancers and adenomas. Cancer Res 2002;62:3382–3386.
Hibi K, Kodera Y, Ito K, et al. Methylation pattern of CDH13 gene in digestive tract cancers. Br J Cancer 2004;91:1139–1142.
Takeuchi T, Liang SB, Matsuyoshi N, et al. Loss of T-cadherin (CDH13, H-cadherin) expression in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Lab Invest 2002;82:1023–1029.
Sakai M, Hibi K, Koshikawa K, et al. Frequent promoter methylation and gene silencing of CDH13 in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Sci 2004;95:588–591.
Strathdee G . Epigenetic versus genetic alterations in the inactivation of E-cadherin. Semin Cancer Biol 2002;12:373–379.
Qian ZR, Li CC, Yamasaki H, et al. Role of E-cadherin, alpha-, beta-, and gamma-catenins, and p120 (cell adhesion molecules) in prolactinoma behavior. Mod Pathol 2002;15:1357–1365.
Xu B, Sano T, Yoshimoto K, et al. Downregulation of E-cadherin and its undercoat proteins in pituitary growth hormone cell adenomas with prominent fibrous bodies. Endocr Pathol 2002;13:341–351.
Herman JG, Baylin SB . Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hypermethylation. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2042–2054.
Seemann N, Kuhn D, Wrocklage C, et al. CDKN2A/P16 inactivation is related to pituitary adenoma type and size. J Pathol 2001;193:491–497.
Simpson DJ, McNicol AM, Murray DC, et al. Molecular pathology shows p16 methylation in nonadenomatous pituitaries from patients with Cushing's disease. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:1780–1788.
Simpson DJ, Hibberts NA, McNicol AM, et al. Loss of pRb expression in pituitary adenomas is associated with methylation of the RB1 CpG island. Cancer Res 2000;60:1211–1216.
Simpson DJ, Clayton RN, Farrell WE . Preferential loss of death associated protein kinase expression in invasive pituitary tumours is associated with either CpG island methylation or homozygous deletion. Oncogene 2002;21:1217–1224.
Bahar A, Bicknell JE, Simpson DJ, et al. Loss of expression of the growth inhibitory gene GADD45gamma, in human pituitary adenomas, is associated with CpG island methylation. Oncogene 2004;23:936–944.
Qian ZR, Sano T, Yoshimoto K, et al. Inactivation of RASSF1A tumor suppressor gene by aberrant promoter hypermethylation in human pituitary adenomas. Lab Invest 2005;85:464–473.
Asa SL . Tumors of The Pituitary Gland. Atlas of Tumor Pathology, Series Fascicle 22. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology: Washington, DC, USA, 1998, pp 49–54.
Hardy J . Transsphenoidal microsurgical treatment of pituitary tumours. In: Linfoot J (ed). Recent Advances in The Diagnosis and Treatment of Pituitary Tumours. Raven Press: New York, 1979, pp 375–388.
Herman JG, Graff JR, Myohanen S, et al. Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:9821–9826.
Cavallaro U, Christofori G . Cell adhesion and signalling by cadherins and Ig-CAMs in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:118–132.
Amar AP, Hinton DR, Krieger MD, et al. Invasive pituitary adenomas: significance of proliferation parameters. Pituitary 1999;2:117–122.
Zhang X, Horwitz GA, Heaney AP, et al. Pituitary tumor transforming gene (PTTG) expression in pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:761–767.
Qian ZR, Sano T, Asa SL, et al. Cytoplasmic expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor-4 in human pituitary adenomas: relation to tumor type, size, proliferation, and invasiveness. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:1904–1911.
Turner HE, Nagy Z, Esiri MM, et al. Role of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in pituitary tumor behavior. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:2931–2935.
Takeichi M . Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science 1991;251:1451–1455.
Hirohashi S, Kanai Y . Cell adhesion system and human cancer morphogenesis. Cancer Sci 2003;94:575–581.
St Croix B, Sheehan C, Rak JW, et al. E-cadherin-dependent growth suppression is mediated by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27KIP1. J Cell Biol 1998;142:557–571.
Maruyama R, Sugio K, Yoshino I, et al. Hypermethylation of FHIT as a prognostic marker in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 2004;100:1472–1477.
Takahashi T, Shivapurkar N, Riquelme E, et al. Aberrant promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in gallbladder carcinoma and chronic cholecystitis. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:6126–6133.
Xu XL, Yu J, Zhang HY, et al. Methylation profile of the promoter CpG islands of 31 genes that may contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis. World J Gastroenterol 2004;10:3441–3454.
Aggerholm A, Hokland P . DAP-kinase CpG island methylation in acute myeloid leukemia: methodology versus biology? Blood 2000;95:2997–2999.
Geisler JP, Manahan KJ, Geisler HE . Evaluation of DNA methylation in the human genome: why examine it and what method to use. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2004;25:19–24.
Fearon ER . Connecting estrogen receptor function, transcriptional repression, and E-cadherin expression in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 2003;3:307–310.
Ino Y, Gotoh M, Sakamoto M, et al. Dysadherin a cancer-associated cell membrane glycoprotein, down-regulates E-cadherin and promotes metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:365–370.
Shiozaki H, Kadowaki T, Doki Y, et al. Effect of epidermal growth factor on cadherin-mediated adhesion in a human oesophageal cancer cell line. Br J Cancer 1995;71:250–258.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by a grant from the Foundation for Growth Science and Novo Nordisk growth award.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qian, Z., Sano, T., Yoshimoto, K. et al. Tumor-specific downregulation and methylation of the CDH13 (H-cadherin) and CDH1 (E-cadherin) genes correlate with aggressiveness of human pituitary adenomas. Mod Pathol 20, 1269–1277 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3800965
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3800965
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Transcriptome of GH-producing pituitary neuroendocrine tumours and models are significantly affected by somatostatin analogues
Cancer Cell International (2023)
-
Investigation of the Therapeutic Effects of Palbociclib Conjugated Magnetic Nanoparticles on Different Types of Breast Cancer Cell Lines
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering (2023)
-
Potential biomarkers and lncRNA-mRNA regulatory networks in invasive growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation (2021)
-
Structure, Function, and Morphology in the Classification of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: the Importance of Routine Analysis of Pituitary Transcription Factors
Endocrine Pathology (2020)
-
Preoperative prediction of cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenomas using a radiomics method based on magnetic resonance images
European Radiology (2019)