Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic eczematous skin disorder characterized by dry and itchy skin. The patients with AD often have a family history of other allergic diseases including asthma and hay fever. Although AD is known to be a manifestation of immediate hypersensitivity mediated by IgE, delayed-type hypersensitivity is also involved in the skin reaction of the patients (Tanaka et al, 1994; Varela et al, 1999). Interestingly, in mice, repeated application of contact sensitizing agents, such as 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) and trinitrochlorobenzene, develops an immediate-type reaction, in contrast to a single application that causes a typical delayed-type reaction (Kitagaki et al, 1995, 1997). Repeated elicitation with such agents not only increases the serum level of IgE but also induces Th2-type cytokine expression (Nagai et al, 1997b). In addition, mast cell accumulation occurs in the dermis because of the repeated challenge (Kitagaki et al, 1995), as is often observed in AD patients. Therefore, this animal model is thought to be valuable for studying human AD.

Chymase is a chymotrypsin-like serine protease and is primarily stored in secretory granules of mast cells (Schwartz and Austen, 1980). Chymase cleaves a variety of physiological substances, including metalloproteases (Fang et al, 1997), procollagen (Kofford et al, 1997), precursor of interleukin 1β (IL-1β) (Mizutani et al, 1991b), and membrane-associated stem cell factor (Longley et al, 1997), while its precise role is not clear. Human mast cells are classified into two types, MCTC and MCT, based on their composition of serine protease (Irani et al, 1986). MCTC contains both chymase and tryptase, while MCT expresses tryptase but not chymase. Because MCTC predominates in the skin (Irani et al, 1989), chymase has been implicated in the pathogenesis of skin disorders complicated by mast cell accumulation, eg, AD (DeMora et al, 1996; Tanaka et al, 1999) and scleroderma (Irani et al, 1992; Kakizoe et al, 2001).

Here, we report that the inhibitor for chymase inhibits the dermatitis induced by repeated challenge with DNFB, judging by the skin thickness and eosinophil infiltration, and that purified chymase elicits skin response similar to that induced by the DNFB painting. These findings suggest that chymase may participate in the pathogenesis of AD by promoting eosinophil infiltration at the inflammation sites.

Results

Effect of Chymase Inhibitor on Ear Swelling Induced by Repeated Challenge with DNFB

As shown in Figure 1, an epicutaneous application of DNFB to the ears of C3H/HeN mice elicited a transient skin reaction, while painting with solvent for DNFB caused little effect on the ear thickness. Repeating the challenge with DNFB weekly for 6 weeks not only enhanced the transient response to DNFB, but also increased the baseline of ear thickness. Intraperitoneal administration of prednisolone (10 or 30 mg/kg) 5 times a week for 37 days (36 times in total) reduced the increase of the ear thickness in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2A). That is, injection of prednisolone at 30 mg/kg significantly reduced the DNFB-induced ear swelling at 0, 1, 6, 24, and 48 hours after the third challenge with DNFB. The effect was milder at a dose of 10 mg/kg, but statistical significance was detected at all the time points measured except at 48 hours after the third painting.

Figure 1
figure 1

Change in ear thickness by repeated challenge with 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB). Ear edema was induced by repeated painting with DNFB, and ear thickness was measured at 0, 1, 6, 24, and 48 hours after each painting using a thickness gauge. Increase in ear thickness was determined by subtracting the ear thickness before the first painting from that of each point after. The same volume of acetone/olive oil was painted on control mice. Closed square, painted with DNFB; Open square, painted with acetone/olive oil instead of DNFB. Data are mean ± sem. Arrows indicate the timing of the challenge with DNFB.

Figure 2
figure 2

Effect of chymase inhibitors on ear edema induced by repeated painting with DNFB. Ear edema was induced by repeated painting with DNFB, and ear thickness was measured at 0, 1, 6, 24, and 48 hours after each painting using a thickness gauge. Increase in ear thickness was determined by subtracting the ear thickness before the first painting from that of each point after. Chemicals were administered ip once a day, five times a week. Only the data after the third painting were shown. A, prednisolone; B, SUN-C7512; C, SUN-C8077; D, SUN-C8257. Closed square, vehicle; Open circle, 10 mg/kg; Open triangle, 30 mg/kg (A) or 50 mg/kg (B–D). Data are mean ± sem *, p < 0.05 as compared with the vehicle group (Dunnett's test, n = 6 or 7).

When chymase inhibitors were administered at 10 or 50 mg/kg with the same protocol as that of prednisolone, the DNFB-induced ear swelling was also reduced (Fig. 2, B to D). For example, SUN-C7512 at 50 mg/kg significantly suppressed the increase in ear thickness at 1, 6, 24, and 48 hours following the fourth challenge and thereafter, although SUN-C7512 at 10 mg/kg showed little effect (Fig. 2B). A trend of decrease in the skin reaction was also observed when SUN-C7512 was given orally at 50 mg/kg (data not shown). Similar results were observed when other inhibitors, SUN-C8077 and SUN-C8257, were used; the effect of SUN-C8077 was dose-dependent, whereas the inhibition by SUN-C8257 seems saturated at 10 mg/kg (Fig. 2, C and D). These results suggest that mast cell chymase may be involved in the development of skin reaction induced by repeated painting with a contact sensitizing agent.

Effect of Chymase Inhibitors on Eosinophil Accumulation in DNFB-Induced Dermatitis

As shown in Figure 3, repeated challenge of DNFB weekly for 6 weeks increased the number of eosinophils in the skin lesion at 48 hours after the last challenge. Intraperitoneal administration of SUN-C8257 (10 or 50 mg/kg) 5 times a week for 6 weeks significantly suppressed the increase in the number of skin eosinophils (Fig. 3). There was also a tendency for SUN-C8077 to inhibit the eosinophil infiltration in a dose-dependent manner, though the inhibition was not statistically significant in this case. This finding suggests that chymase may be related to the eosinophil infiltration in the DNFB-induced dermatitis, and that the remission of ear swelling by chymase inhibitor may be associated with decrease of the eosinophil number.

Figure 3
figure 3

Effect of chymase inhibitor on DNFB-induced eosinophil infiltration. Dermatitis was induced by repeated painting with DNFB, and the number of dermal eosinophils was determined 48 hours after the last painting as described in “Materials and Methods.” Hatched bar, painted with DNFB; Closed bar, painted with acetone/olive oil. Data are mean ± sem #, p < 0.01 as compared with the control (acetone/olive oil) group; **, p < 0.01 as compared with vehicle group (Dunnett's test, n = 6 or 7).

Skin Reaction Induced by Intradermal Injection with Human Chymase

To further elucidate the role of chymase in dermatitis, recombinant human chymase was injected intradermally into the mouse ear 5 times on a weekly basis. As shown in Figure 4A, an injection of human chymase caused a transient ear swelling. The chymase-induced cutaneous reaction resembled the reaction induced by DNFB in that the transient edematous response was augmented in proportion to the number of the challenges. Peak increase of ear thickness after the fifth injection of chymase was approximately 70 μm, whereas after the first injection it was 35 μm at most. Neither heat-inactivated chymase (Fig. 4A) nor human serum albumin (Fig. 4B) induced ear swelling, suggesting that chymase-induced skin reaction is dependent on its proteolytic activity but not its antigenicity.

Figure 4
figure 4

Change in ear thickness induced by injection with human chymase; 2.0 μg of human chymase (A) or human serum albumin (B) was injected intradermally to mouse ear at 7-day intervals and ear thickness was measured at 0, 1, 6, and 24 hours after each injection using a thickness gauge. Abilities of heat-inactivated chymase and saline to induce skin reaction were also examined. Increase in ear thickness was determined by subtracting the ear thickness before the first injection with human chymase from that of each point after. Closed square, human chymase (A) or human serum albumin (B); open square, heat-inactivated human chymase; open circle, saline. Data are mean ± sem *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 as compared with the saline group (Student's t test, n = 5).

Effect of Chymase Injection on Dermal Eosinophil Number

Next, recombinant human chymase was injected intradermally into the mouse ear weekly, and change of eosinophil number at the injection site was examined. As shown in Figure 5, dermal eosinophil number of chymase-injected mice was approximately 7.6-fold and 21-fold at 7 days after the first and fourth injection of chymase, respectively, as compared with that of the corresponding control. The result is consistent with the data of He and Walls (1998) who have shown that human chymase induces the accumulation of inflammatory cells including eosinophils in the peritoneal cavity of mice and the skin of guinea pigs.

Figure 5
figure 5

Induction of eosinophil accumulation induced by chymase injection. Human chymase (2.0 μg) (hatched bar) or the same volume of saline (closed bar) was injected intradermally to the mouse ear 4 times at 7-day intervals, and dermal eosinophil number was determined 7 days after the injection as described in “Materials and Methods.” Data are mean ± sem **, p < 0.01 as compared with the corresponding control (Student's t test, n = 5).

Chemotactic Activity of Human Chymase for Eosinophils

To clarify the mechanism by which chymase induces eosinophil accumulation, the effect of human chymase on migration of human peripheral eosinophils was examined in vitro. As shown in Figure 6, platelet activating factor (PAF) (0.01–0.1 μm) stimulated eosinophil migration in a concentrated manner. Similarly, human chymase (0.5–1.0 μm) enhanced the migration of eosinophils, although the minimum effective concentration of human chymase appeared to be higher than that of PAF. This finding is consistent with that of Tani et al (2000) and suggests that chymase-induced eosinophil infiltration in mice may be mediated by the chemotactic activity of chymase.

Figure 6
figure 6

Effect of human chymase on migration of human eosinophils in vitro. Human eosinophils were isolated and chemotactic assay was performed as described in “Materials and Methods.” Data are expressed as migrated cells per high power field (mean ± se) (n = 3). Hatched bar, human chymase; Closed bar, no stimulant; Open bar, platelet activating factor (PAF). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 as compared with the control (Dunnett's test).

Discussion

Topical application with DNFB elicited a transient skin swelling, and repeating the application enlarged the reaction (Fig. 1). Administration of chymase inhibitor significantly prevented development of ear swelling induced by the DNFB challenge (Fig. 2). Repeated injection of chymase caused a cutaneous reaction similar to the DNFB-induced dermatitis (Fig. 4). These results suggest the involvement of mast cell chymase in the development of dermatitis induced by repeated challenges with a contact-sensitizing agent. This idea is supported by the result of the study using mast-cell-deficient mice, ie, the magnitude of the skin reaction induced by repeated painting with trinitrochlorobenzene is much less in mast cell-deficient mice WBB6F1-W/Wv than in their litter mates WBB6F1-+/+ (Kitagaki et al, 1997).

The mechanism by which the DNFB-induced skin response increases in proportion to the number of the challenge is unclear at present. The effect of chymase inhibitor on contact dermatitis induced by a single application of DNFB was little, if any (data not shown). Thus, the mechanisms that mediate the skin reaction induced by single and repeated challenge with a contact sensitizing agent appear to be different from each other. Both DNFB painting and chymase injection caused eosinophil accumulation in mice (Figs. 3 and 5), and the chymase inhibitor reduced the DNFB-induced eosinophil accumulation (Fig. 3). These findings suggest a hypothesis that eosinophils may be crucial for development of the dermatitis induced by repeated painting with DNFB and that the effect of the chymase inhibitor on ear edema in the model may be the result of the inhibition of eosinophil infiltration.

Human chymase stimulated migration of human eosinophils in vitro (Fig. 6). This finding naturally indicates that the DNFB- and chymase-induced eosinophil accumulation in mice is, at least in part, due to the chemotactic activity of chymase. The direct action of chymase in stimulating eosinophil migration might be mediated via putative receptor(s), such as protease-activated receptor(s) (PAR) (Cocks and Moffatt, 2000) like cathepsin G, an enzyme closely related to chymase, which acts on the platelet by interacting with PAR-4 (Sambrano et al, 2000). An alternative explanation for chymase-induced eosinophil migration is that chymase promotes production of chemokines such as eotaxin. Our preliminary experiment shows that eotaxin concentration is undetectable in the chemotaxis chamber even after the treatment with chymase for 1 hour, indicating that eotaxin is not involved in the chemotactic activity of chymase. However, the possibility that chymase-induced eosinophil migration is mediated by other chemokines is not completely denied.

The eosinophil infiltration induced by chymase injection in mice could also be explained by the ability of chymase to produce IL-1β that is a potent inducer of eosinophil accumulation (Sanz et al, 1995) because chymase can cleave IL-1β precursor to produce an active IL-1β (Mizutani et al, 1991b). Epidermal keratinocytes produces an IL-1β precursor but lacks an activity of interleukin 1 converting enzyme (Mizutani et al, 1991a), and mast cell chymase could, therefore, process the IL-1β precursor released by keratinocytes in epidermis at inflammatory sites. In fact, IL-1β species corresponding to that processed by chymase was detected in psoriatic scales (Lundqvist and Egelrud, 1997) and human stratum corneum (Brattsand and Egelrud, 1998).

One of the most interesting features of the dermatitis induced by repeated painting of contact sensitizing agents is a shift of Th1-type to Th2-type reaction (Kitagaki et al, 1995). Nagai et al (1997a) have shown that FK-506 and cyclosporin A, which suppressed ear edema induced by repeated challenge with DNFB, inhibited synthesis of interferon γ but not interleukin 4 in this model. They have concluded that these immunosuppressants inhibit DNFB-induced contact dermatitis, probably by a selective inhibitory action upon Th1 cells. In contrast, chymase inhibitor SUN-C8077 affected neither interferon γ nor interleukin 4 levels in the serum in the DNFB-induced dermatitis, although SUN-C8257 slightly decreased interleukin 4 levels (data not shown). Thus, unlike the immunosuppressants, inhibition of the skin reaction by chymase inhibitor is presumably independent on Th1/Th2 balance.

In conclusion, the data in this study suggest that mast cell chymase participates in development of skin reactions induced by repeated application with contact sensitizing agents, probably by affecting eosinophil infiltration. Because the DNFB-induced dermatitis employed in this study is thought to be an animal model for chronic dermatitis including human AD, our data also show that chymase may play an important role in pathogenesis of AD, and chymase inhibitor may be beneficial for treatment of AD.

Materials and Methods

Mice

C3H/HeN mice were purchased from CLEA Japan, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). All animal experiments were performed according to the Guideline for Animal Experimentation (Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 1987).

DNFB-Induced Dermatitis

Allergic dermatitis was induced by repeated topical application with DNFB as described previously (Nagai et al, 1997b). Briefly, 25 μl of 0.15% DNFB in acetone/olive oil (3:1) was applied to each side of right ears of C3H/HeN mice 6 times at 7-day intervals. Ear thickness was measured 0, 1, 6, 24, and 48 hours after each painting using a thickness gauge (Digimatic Indicator, Mitsutoyo, Tokyo, Japan), and increase in ear thickness was determined by subtracting ear thickness before the first painting from that of each point after. The same volume of acetone/olive oil was painted on control mice.

Chymase Inhibitors

Inhibitors for chymase have been synthesized as described previously (Fukami et al, 2000). The inhibitors employed in this study are 3-[ 4-(pyrazol-3-yl)phenylsulfonyl]-7-chloroquinazorine 2, 4(1H, 3H)-dione (SUN-C7512), 3-(3-aminophenylsulfonyl)-7-chloroquinazorine 2, 4(1H, 3H)-dione (SUN-C8077), 3-[(3-amino-4-carboxy)phenylsulfonyl]-7-chloroquinazorine 2, and 4(1H, 3H)-dione (SUN-C8257). IC50 values of SUN-C7512, SUN-C8077, and SUN-C8257 for human chymase are 0.070 μm, 0.36 μm, and 0.13 μm, respectively. None of them shows an inhibitory effect on bovine trypsin even at 10 μm. The inhibitors were suspended in 0.5% hydroxy propyl cellulose (Nippon Soda Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and administered ip once a day, five times a week (from Monday to Friday). As a control, prednisolone (Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Kyoto, Japan) was similarly suspended in 0.5% hydroxy propyl cellulose and administered.

Histological Analysis

Ear samples were fixed in 10% (vol/vol) buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 μm, and then stained with Fast Green FCF (Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo, Japan) for staining of eosinophils. The number of eosinophils was determined by counting the stained cells in 10 high-power fields for each section using an ocular grid.

Recombinant Human Chymase

Human chymase was expressed in CHO cells using the secretion and activation pathway of trypsin II (Yamashiro et al, 1997). Briefly, cDNA for mature human chymase (79–756) (Urata et al, 1991) was amplified by PCR, and the product was cloned into pDE in conjunction with 23 amino acid residues of human trypsin II precursor that includes signal sequence and cleavage site for enterokinase. The resultant plasmid was transfected to CHOdhfr-, and the transfectant was selected as described (Tsuruoka et al, 1993). The fusion protein in culture supernatant of the transfectant was concentrated with HiTrap Heparin column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Tokyo, Japan) and cleaved with recombinant enterokinase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). The mature form of human chymase was then purified with Heparin 5PW column (Tosoh Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and the purity was assessed by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with 10 to 20% gradient gel (10/20 Multi gel, Daiich Pure Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan). Activity of recombinant human chymase was measured using 1 mm Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-MCA (Peptide Institute, Osaka, Japan) in 0.1 M Tris/HCl, pH 8.0. For heat inactivation of human chymase, 0.1 mg/ml of the chymase solution was incubated for 2 hours at 50° C followed by boiling for 5 minutes.

Chymase Injection

Human recombinant chymase was dissolved in saline and 20 μl of the chymase solution was injected intradermally (2.0 μg/site) to right ear of mice 5 times at 7-day intervals. Ear thickness was measured 0, 1, 6, and 24 hours after each injection using a thickness gauge, and increase in ear thickness was determined as described above. The same volume of saline, heat-inactivated human chymase or human serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) (2.0 μg/site) was injected in control mice.

Isolation of Eosinophils

Human eosinophils were isolated from heparinized whole blood of healthy volunteers. Briefly, whole blood was mixed with 6% dextran (1:5, vol/vol), and erythrocytes were sedimented by settling for 1 hour at 37° C. The clear top fraction containing granulocytes was layered on Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), and centrifuged at 500 × g for 30 minutes to collect granulocytes. Eosinophils were isolated from the granulocyte fraction by negative immunomagnetic selection using anti-CD16 MACS-particles (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, California) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Purity of eosinophils was determined by Fast Green staining and was usually >98%.

Chemotaxis Assay

Chemotaxis assay was performed using a 48-well microchemotaxis chamber in which a polycarbonate filter with a pore diameter of 5 μm (Neuroprobe, Cabin John, Maryland) separates the upper and the lower compartments. 50 μl of cell suspension (4× 106 cells per ml) was placed in the upper chamber and aliquots of either human chymase or PAF (Sigma-Aldrich) was added in the lower chamber. The chamber was incubated for 1 hour at 37° C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Then, the filter was removed, and cells on the filter were fixed and stained with Hemacolor (Merck Diagnostics, Darmstadt, Germany). The migrated cells adhered to the distal part of the filter were counted in three high-power fields for each well.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed with Dunnett's multiple comparison test or Student's t test using SuperANOVA (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, California) or Statview (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina), respectively. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.