Introduction

Pulmonary infiltration by polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) is frequently observed during acute lung injury (ALI) (Artigas et al, 1998). Interest in the pathogenetic mechanisms of ALI has focused in recent years on interactions between PMN and cytokines (Pittet et al, 1997). In particular, several reports from our group and others have indicated that circulating and alveolar PMN are activated and that proinflammatory cytokines may play an active role in this process (Chollet-Martin et al, 1992, 1996; Martin et al, 1991). Activated PMN can damage the lung through several potential mechanisms, including the release of proteases, cytokines, and reactive oxygen species (ROS), but recent data also suggest a role for PMN in the modulation of inflammation and tissue repair (Boutten et al, 1998; Donnelly et al, 1995). In particular, we showed that blood PMN were able to release oncostatin M (OSM) through a two-step mechanism that involves degranulation followed by de novo protein synthesis, leading to rapid and sustained OSM secretion at inflammatory sites (Grenier et al, 1999). OSM, an IL-6–family cytokine, is a potent inducer of several antiproteases, including α1-antitrypsin (α1-AT), in both hepatocytes and lung epithelial cells (Cichy et al, 1998a; Sallenave et al, 1997). OSM could thus participate in local antiprotease defenses within the lung. Moreover, in a recent study using a model of acute inflammatory disease, in vivo administration of OSM reduced inflammation and mortality (Wallace et al, 1999). Because high levels of OSM have been found recently in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from patients with severe pneumonia, but not from healthy volunteers (Dehoux et al, 1999), we postulated that alveolar PMN might play a role in this local OSM synthesis.

The aim of this study was to quantify OSM production by blood and alveolar PMN isolated from patients with ALI, and to compare patients with and without severe pneumonia. Systemic and local OSM production was compared in each patient, and correlations with clinical parameters were sought. Our data suggest that, in addition to their well-documented deleterious effects on lung structures, PMN can also modulate the inflammatory response by synthesizing OSM and thereby play a new role in recovery from ALI.

Results

Patients

The clinical characteristics of the 24 patients at the time of the assays are listed in Table 1. The primary indications for mechanical ventilation in the patients with pneumonia (n = 15) were postoperative heart failure (n = 9), postoperative respiratory failure (n = 1), severe community-acquired pneumonia (n = 2), hemorrhagic shock (n = 1), postoperative septic syndrome (n = 1), and neurologic emergency (n = 1). In the patients without pneumonia (n = 9), the primary indications for ventilation were postoperative septic syndrome (n = 3), heart failure (n = 3), neurologic emergency (n = 1), respiratory failure (n = 1), and cardiac arrest (n = 1). In the 15 patients with pneumonia, protected specimen brushing and/or BAL fluid culture yielded a single organism in nine cases: (Pseudomonas aeruginosa = 1, Haemophilus influenzae = 1, Staphylococcus aureus = 2, Proteus mirabilis = 2, Escherichia coli = 1, Acinetobacter baumannii = 1, Streptococcus pneumonia = 1) and two organisms in six cases: (Staphylococcus aureus = 4, Streptococcus oralis = 1, Streptococcus viridans = 1, Morganella morganii = 1, Haemophilus influenzae = 1, Proteus mirabilis = 1, Neisseria = 1, Pseudomonas aeruginosa = 1, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia= 1).

Table 1 Clinical Characteristics of the Patients with Acute Lung Injury

Tidal volumes, FiO2 values, and lung injury scores were similar in the two groups. Only one patient in each patient group had positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (Table 1). The mortality rates are listed in Table 1.

BAL Fluid Cytology

Table 2 shows the total and differential BAL fluid cell counts in the two groups of patients. The total number of cells was significantly higher in the patients with pneumonia than in the patients without pneumonia (p < 0.05). The percentage and absolute number of neutrophils were significantly higher in BAL fluid from patients with pneumonia than from patients without pneumonia (p < 0.05). Macrophages represented less than half the cells in BAL fluid from the two groups of patients, and their absolute number was similar in the two groups.

Table 2 Total and Differential Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Cell Counts in Patients with Acute Lung Injury

OSM Levels in BAL Fluid Supernatant

As shown in Figure 1, OSM was detected in the BAL fluid supernatants from all but two of the patients without pneumonia. In these two patients, OSM values were assigned the detection limit (2.1 pg/ml). The concentration of OSM was significantly higher in BAL fluid from patients with pneumonia than from patients without pneumonia (339 ± 109 pg/ml versus 49 ± 13 pg/ml, respectively; p < 0.05).

Figure 1
figure 1

Mean and individual oncostatin M (OSM) concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from the two groups of patients with acute lung injury (ALI). * p < 0.05 versus patients without pneumonia.

Plasma OSM Levels

In contrast with the elevated OSM concentrations in BAL fluid supernatants, OSM was only detectable in the plasma of four patients with pneumonia (55, 22, 39, and 19 pg/ml), one patient without pneumonia (11 pg/ml), and none of the healthy controls. Interestingly, the patients with detectable plasma OSM all had septic shock.

Immunocytochemical Detection of OSM in BAL Cells

Immunocytochemistry showed the presence of intracellular OSM in both alveolar PMN and macrophages in BAL cell cytospin preparations (Fig. 2). In the overall patient population, OSM concentrations in BAL fluid supernatants showed a strong positive correlation with the absolute number of PMN (but not with macrophages or lymphocytes) in BAL fluid (ρ = 0.74, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3). This argues for a major participation of PMN in OSM production but does not exclude a role for macrophages.

Figure 2
figure 2

Immunocytochemical detection of OSM in BAL cells. A, Negative control. No staining was observed with an isotypic control immunoglobulin. B, Intracellular red staining was observed in both polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) (right) and macrophages (left), using a specific polyclonal antiOSM antibody. Cytospin preparations were examined with a light microscope at × 100 magnification.

Figure 3
figure 3

Correlation between alveolar OSM concentrations and the absolute number of PMN in BAL fluid from the two patient groups (Spearman’s correlation coefficient test [log scale]; (ρ = 0.74, p < 0.001).

Spontaneous Ex Vivo OSM Secretion by Blood and Alveolar PMN

Spontaneous OSM secretion by blood and alveolar PMN after 18 hours of culture was compared in the two groups. As shown in Figure 4, blood PMN displayed normal spontaneous OSM secretion in the two groups of patients (114 ± 25 pg/ml/107 PMN in patients without pneumonia, 129 ± 36 pg/ml/107 PMN in patients with pneumonia), on the basis of healthy control values (119 ± 10 pg/ml/107 PMN). Spontaneous OSM production by alveolar PMN was significantly higher in the patients with pneumonia than in the patients without pneumonia (614 ± 133 pg/ml/107 PMN versus 174 ± 77 pg/ml/107 PMN, p < 0.01) (Fig. 4). Interestingly, OSM production by alveolar PMN was significantly higher than that by autologous peripheral blood PMN in patients with pneumonia (paired comparisons, p < 0.01). Moreover, in the overall patient population, the OSM concentration in BAL fluid supernatants correlated with the capacity of alveolar PMN to produce OSM ex vivo (ρ = 0.54, p < 0.05).

Figure 4
figure 4

Spontaneous OSM production by alveolar and blood PMN cultured for 18 hours. OSM was measured in the cell-free supernatants of cultured PMN from healthy controls and patients with ALI with or without pneumonia. * p < 0.01 versus patients without pneumonia; ♯ p < 0.01 versus autologous blood PMN; ND, not done.

Correlations between OSM Concentrations and Clinical Parameters

There was a trend toward a correlation between OSM levels in BAL fluid and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (p = 0.07) but not the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS). Neither of these latter parameters correlated with plasma OSM concentrations or OSM production by blood PMN (data not shown). None of the OSM data correlated with outcome, the presence of septic shock, or the bacterial type and density. Finally, OSM values were not significantly different in survivors and nonsurvivors.

Discussion

This study identifies a cellular source for the high OSM concentrations found in the alveolar spaces of patients with ALI. Moreover, purified alveolar PMN from patients with pneumonia spontaneously produced high levels of OSM ex vivo, with values always higher than those obtained with autologous blood PMN.

All of the patients were ventilated using a lung-protective strategy with similar low tidal volumes to reduce the mechanical ventilation-induced inflammatory response (ARDS Network, 2000; Ranieri et al, 1999). We can thus assume that the differences in OSM levels observed among the patients were not related to differences in tidal volumes.

It has recently been reported that OSM is detectable in the BAL fluid of patients with nosocomial pneumonia but not that of healthy controls (Dehoux et al, 1999). We confirm these data in patients with severe pneumonia, and extend them to ALI patients without pneumonia. Two other cytokines also belonging to the IL-6 family have previously been found at high concentrations in BAL fluid from patients with ALI, namely leukemia inhibitory factor (Jorens et al, 1996) and IL-6 (Chollet-Martin et al, 1996). We found that OSM concentrations were significantly higher in BAL fluid from patients with pneumonia than from ALI patients free of pneumonia. It is noteworthy that the amount of OSM correlated strongly with the absolute number of PMN in BAL fluid. Because our group has recently observed the capacity of human blood PMN to produce and release OSM (Grenier et al, 1999), we think these cells may be a major source of OSM within the alveoli. Other cells potentially contributing to this local OSM production include monocytes/macrophages (Malik et al, 1989), as shown by positive staining of both PMN and macrophages on BAL cell cytospin preparations. In contrast to PMN, we found that absolute macrophage counts did not correlate with OSM concentrations in BAL fluid. Although we did not exclude a role of alveolar macrophages in local OSM production, the aim of this work was to focus on the role of PMN, which are of major importance in the pathogenesis of ALI.

PMN are thus a potentially important local source of OSM during pulmonary inflammation, through a two-step mechanism we have previously observed in blood PMN (Grenier et al, 1999). This mechanism was confirmed here, albeit on a limited number of alveolar PMN samples, owing to the difficulty of obtaining sufficient PMN from BAL fluid (not shown).

OSM is first released from an intracellular stock. The recent description of an alternative OSM gene transcript potentially encoding an intracellular OSM protein further supports the existence of a rapidly mobilizable form of OSM (Voyle and Rathjen 2000). The second step involves de novo OSM synthesis by PMN, leading to sustained OSM release at inflammatory sites. In this study we observed spontaneous OSM production by alveolar PMN isolated from all of the patients, and especially from those with pneumonia. The trend toward a correlation with the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, but not with a more general index of pulmonary disease severity (SAPS), suggests that OSM production by highly purified alveolar PMN may play a role in the resolution of pulmonary inflammation. Spontaneous high OSM production may serve as a new marker of cell activation in this setting. Indeed, alveolar PMN are known to be locally activated, as reflected by CD11b and CD62L adhesion molecule expression and ROS production (Chabot et al, 1998; Chollet-Martin et al, 1996; Martin et al, 1991). PMN may thus have a dual role, both inducing and helping to repairing tissue lesions. Numerous mediators present within the alveoli, such as GM-CSF, INFγ, TNFα, and bacterial products, can activate and/or prime PMN in vivo, leading to high spontaneous OSM production ex vivo (these mediators are the most potent OSM inducers in vitro) (Grenier et al, 1999). Indeed, BAL fluid supernatants from patients with pneumonia were able to stimulate OSM production by normal blood PMN (not shown). Moreover, mechanical stress such as that induced by adherence and transendothelial migration can also contribute to PMN activation. For example, we and others have shown that cytokine production by PMN is dependent on integrin-extracellular matrix interactions (Derevianko et al, 1996; Gaudry et al, 1997).

Unlike alveolar PMN, circulating PMN did not seem to be strong OSM producers. Spontaneous OSM production by blood PMN was normal in both groups of patients, and plasma OSM was undetectable in most cases. The five patients who had low but detectable levels of plasma OSM all had septic shock, as previously reported (Guillet et al, 1995). However, blood PMN are known to be activated during severe pneumonia, as reflected by the results of several functional tests based on adhesion, degranulation, and the oxidative burst (Chabot et al, 1998; Chollet-Martin et al, 1996; Martin et al, 1991). Our results thus suggest that PMN are not globally activated in these settings, but that certain functions are selectively activated. Levels of leukemia inhibitory factor, which shares certain properties with OSM, are increased in culture supernatants of whole-blood cells from patients with ALI (Gruson et al, 1998), suggesting that the mechanisms of OSM and leukemia inhibitory factor secretion by blood cells during ALI may differ.

Because endothelial cells have abundant OSM receptors, circulating OSM may play a role in initiating the inflammatory response by increasing adhesion molecule expression, PMN adhesion, and transmigration (Modur et al, 1997; Yao et al, 1996). In our patients, the normal plasma OSM levels and the OSM production by blood PMN ex vivo suggest that OSM is not involved in alveolar PMN recruitment. However, in the lung, OSM produced locally by PMN could act as an autocrine or paracrine proinflammatory mediator; indeed, OSM can trigger the release of phospholipase A2 in vitro (Haselmann and Goppelt-Struebe, 1997) and can induce the secretion of gp91phox protein, one of the NADPH oxidase components involved in ROS hyperproduction by PMN in patients with ALI (Chollet-Martin et al, 1992; Hoidal et al, 1998).

As well as these proinflammatory properties, several recent in vivo and in vitro studies suggest that the main role of OSM is to attenuate inflammatory responses and to restore normal homeostasis after tissue injury and/or infection. In a mouse model, OSM administration inhibited lipopolysaccharide-induced TNFα production and increased IL-6 production, but did not affect IL-10 and IL-1β levels (Wallace et al, 1999). These in vivo findings are in keeping with the low TNFα, IL-10, and IL-1β levels and the high IL-6 levels that we have found previously in BAL fluid from patients with ALI (Chollet-Martin et al, 1992, 1994, 1996), and suggest that OSM produced by alveolar PMN could modulate local production of these cytokines.

In vitro, OSM is also a potent modulator of the cytokines involved in the inflammatory response. In particular, OSM inhibits IL-8 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor production by lung fibroblasts (Richards et al, 1996). These two cytokines play a major role in the pathogenesis of ALI, and locally produced OSM might alter their production, particularly by alveolar PMN, through an autocrine effect. In addition to reducing levels of proinflammatory cytokines, OSM can induce the production of several major serine proteinase inhibitors by alveolar epithelial cells, such as α1-AT, α1-antichymotrypsin, and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (Boutten et al, 1998; Cichy et al, 1998b; Sallenave et al, 1997). Because α1-AT is a potent elastase inhibitor, OSM released by alveolar PMN could regulate the local activity of PMN-derived elastase via α1-AT synthesis by alveolar epithelial cells. Similarly, because α1-antichymotrypsin is an effective inhibitor of the NADPH oxidase in PMN, OSM-induced α1-antichymotrypsin synthesis by pulmonary epithelial cells may have a role in modulating ROS-based lung damage (Kilpatrick et al, 1992). Lastly, OSM can also induce the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 by human alveolar epithelial cells (Sallenave et al, 1997) and fibroblasts (Richards et al, 1997; Varghese et al, 1999), both in vitro, and in an in vivo study using an adenovirus vector–expressing mouse OSM (Kerr et al, 1999).

In conclusion, these results demonstrate that high levels of OSM are produced locally during ALI and that PMN contribute to this local production. In addition to their potent proinflammatory effects mediated by cytokine, ROS, and protease secretion, PMN might also attenuate local inflammation in the lungs. Indeed, OSM release by alveolar PMN could help to restore homeostasis after lung injury and/or infection.

Patients and Methods

Patients and Controls

The 24 mechanically ventilated patients enrolled in the study were recruited from the medical intensive care unit of Bichat Hospital in Paris. Ten volunteer nonsmokers served as healthy controls. Informed consent was obtained from the closest relative of each patient and from the healthy controls. All procedures were in strict accordance with the ethical standards of our institution. Patients were included if pneumonia was suspected on the basis of the following criteria: new or persistent lung opacity on chest radiographs plus two of the following items: fever > 38.3° C or hypothermia < 36° C, white blood cell count > 10,000/mm3 or < 5,000/mm3, and a purulent endotracheal aspirate. Patients underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy, and samples were obtained by means of protected specimen brushing and BAL. The patients also underwent blood sampling on the same day. Hypoxemic patients with ALI had restricted fluid intake and underwent diuresis to maintain the intravascular volume at the lowest level consistent with adequate systemic perfusion (especially in patients with heart failure).

All of the patients were ventilated using a tidal volume targeted to maintain a plateau airway pressure less than 35 cm of water and permissive hypercapnia was tolerated. The fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) was set to maintain arterial oxygenation saturation at 0.9. FiO2 was always higher than 0.6, and therefore PEEP was required in only two patients. These settings were in keeping with current recommendations on ALI (Artigas et al, 1998). Because mechanical ventilation has been reported to modulate inflammatory mediator production in the lung, the following ventilatory parameters were recorded: tidal volume, PEEP, FiO2, duration of ventilation, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio.

Empiric antibiotic treatment was started when direct examination of BAL fluid showed that more than 5% of cells contained intracellular organisms, and was subsequently adapted to the results of bacterial identification and susceptibility testing. If less than 5% of cells contained intracellular organisms, antibiotics were given if hemodynamic status changed, gas exchanges worsened, and/or the patient’s underlying condition was severe before the onset of signs of pneumonia; otherwise, antibiotic treatment was started after obtaining the results of protected specimen brushing or BAL culture. The main antibiotics used were glycopeptides, aminoglycosides, and β-lactam agents. None of the patients received corticosteroids or cytotoxic chemotherapy. The other drugs used were vasoactive agents, diuretics, sedatives, heparin, and sucralfate.

Each patient’s hospital chart was reviewed as previously described; general disease severity was estimated using the SAPS, and lung injury severity was estimated using the lung injury score, which includes the extent of roentgenographic densities, the severity of hypoxemia, and the level of PEEP (Chollet-Martin et al, 1996). The number of organ dysfunctions (Fagon et al, 1993) was also recorded on the day of the investigations, together with the presence of sepsis or septic shock. All of the patients included in the study had a lung injury score of less than 2.5 and were thus free of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pneumonia was diagnosed when at least one bacterial species was present at a significant density in the cultured protected specimen brushing sample (≥ 103 cfu/ml) or BAL fluid (≥ 104 cfu/ml), and/or when direct examination of BAL fluid yielded ≥ 5% cells containing intracellular organisms. The 24 ventilated patients were thus assigned to two groups: (1) patients with severe pneumonia (n = 15), and (2) patients without pneumonia (n = 9).

BAL

All of the patients underwent BAL: six 20-ml aliquots of sterile saline were aspirated with a hand-held syringe, in less than 3 minutes, using a standard technique (Chollet-Martin et al, 1996). The fluid recovered from the first aliquot was discarded. Subsequent aliquots were pooled and rapidly filtered through sterile gauze, and the cells were counted with a hemacytometer; cytospin preparations were used for differential counts and screening for intracellular microorganisms. BAL fluid was rapidly centrifuged (1200 × g for 10 minutes at 4° C) and the supernatants were stored at −70° C until OSM assay.

Immunocytochemical Staining of Intracellular OSM in BAL Cells

Cytospin preparations of BAL cells were fixed in cold methanol/acetone. Cytospun cells were first incubated with normal horse serum and with a polyclonal rabbit antihuman-OSM antibody (200 μg/ml) (R&D Systems, Abingdon, United Kingdom), followed by sequential incubation with a biotinylated antibody and alkaline phosphatase-labeled streptavidin, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Vectastain ABC kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, United Kingdom). Staining was completed by incubation with a chromogen substrate solution containing levamisole to block leukocyte alkaline phosphatase activity (Fast red substance solution; DAKO, Carpinteria, California). Positive staining developed as a red reaction product. Cytospin preparations incubated with nonspecific rabbit immunoglobulin (R&D Systems) served as negative controls.

Alveolar PMN Isolation and Culture

The BAL cell pellets were resuspended in PBS (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) supplemented with 2% heat-inactivated FCS (Biowittacker, Gagny, France). PMN were purified by a 20-minute incubation at 4° C with antihuman HLA class II-coated magnetic beads (Dynal, Oslo, Norway) to deplete B lymphocytes, activated T lymphocytes, and alveolar macrophages as previously described (Grenier et al, 1999). The purified alveolar PMN suspension was then adjusted to a density of 107 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 culture medium supplemented with 2 mmol/l glutamine, antibiotics and 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Biowittacker). PMN were then cultured for 18 hours at 37° C with 5% CO2 without exogenous stimuli. Cell-free PMN culture supernatants were then collected and stored at −70° C until OSM assay.

Peripheral Blood PMN Isolation and Culture

Blood PMN from healthy volunteers and patients were isolated and purified as previously described (Grenier et al, 1999). Briefly, after whole-blood sedimentation in medium containing 9% Dextran T-500 (Pharmacia) and 38% Radioselectan (Schering, Lys-lez-Lannoy, France), the leukocyte suspension was centrifuged on Ficoll-Paque medium (Pharmacia) and PMN were further purified (> 99.5%) by a 20-minute incubation with pan antihuman HLA class II-coated magnetic beads. Purified PMN (107/ml) were then cultured for 18 hours at 37° C with 5% CO2 as described above. Cell-free PMN culture supernatants were collected and stored at −70° C until OSM assay.

Plasma Preparation

Blood was collected in sterile EDTA-treated vacuum tubes just before fiberoptic bronchoscopy and immediately centrifuged (1,200 × g for 10 minutes) at 4° C. Plasma was stored at −70° C until OSM assay.

OSM Assay

OSM was assayed in plasma, BAL fluid supernatants, and alveolar and blood PMN culture supernatants by using a commercial ELISA kit (Quantikine; R&D Systems) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The detection limit was 2.1 pg/ml.

Statistical Analysis

All results are expressed as means ± sem. Group means were compared by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by multiple comparison of means by Fisher’s least significance procedure. p ≤ 0.05 was considered to denote statistically significant differences. Paired comparisons between groups were made using Wilcoxon’s paired test. Correlations were identified with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient test (ρ).