Introduction

Portal and periportal inflammatory changes such as piecemeal and bridging necrosis are characteristic of chronic nonA and nonB hepatitis (Dienes et al, 1982; Knodell et al, 1981). Portal inflammation and T-cell infiltration are also key features of hepatitis C (Mosnier et al, 1993; Scheuer et al, 1992). We found, by using in situ hybridization of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA, that infiltrating mononuclear cells are initially exposed to infected hepatocytes in the periportal area (Kojima et al, 1996).

Dendritic cells are thought to play an important role in presenting antigen to naive T cells during viral infection (Austyn, 1998; Sprecher and Becker, 1993; Steinman, 1991; Steinman et al, 1993), and these cells are located in the portal area (Kudo et al, 1997; Prickett et al, 1988). The host immunoreaction to HCV-infected cells may therefore be initiated in the portal and periportal areas.

C-C chemokines are a family of low-molecular mass (8–10 kd) with structurally related proteins having no intervening amino acids between their first two cysteine residues; they exhibit various proinflammatory activities, including chemotaxis (Bacon and Schall, 1996; Baggiolini et al, 1994; Hedrick and Zlotnik, 1996; Miller and Krangel, 1992; Oppenheim et al, 1991). Dendritic-cell-derived C-C chemokine (DC-CK1) is specifically expressed by dendritic cells in germinal centers but may also be found in T zones (Adema et al, 1997). It has preferential chemotactic activity for naive T cells. However, another C-C chemokine, referred to as “regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted” (RANTES), attracts active T cells (Schall et al, 1990). We investigated the role of these C-C chemokines in portal and periportal inflammation associated with chronic hepatitis C.

Results

Cellular Localization of DC-CK1 and RANTES in the Liver

In situ hybridization using antisense riboprobes detected specific signals for DC-CK1 mRNA in mononuclear cells mainly from lymphoid follicles of the portal area of the liver of patients with chronic hepatitis C (Fig. 1, a to d). In contrast, signals for RANTES mRNA were detected at sites of piecemeal necrosis as well as in the portal area (Fig. 2, a to c). Nonspecific signals were not detected by sense probes (Figures 1e and 2d), and positive signals were not detected by antisense probes in cells from the normal liver (Figs. 1f and 2e).

Figure 1
figure 1

In situ hybridization of DC-CK1 mRNA in the liver cells of patients with chronic hepatitis C and in normal controls. in situ hybridization of DC-CK1 mRNA shows positive signals located in the portal area rather than in the lobule (a). Cells are positive in the portal lymphoid follicle (b) and in portal inflammation (c). Positive cells (arrowheads) are apparently distant from the limiting plate (arrows) (d). in situ hybridization with sense probes does not detect non–specific signals (e). Normal liver cells are negative (f). Slides counterstained with methyl green. Magnification: ×64 (a and e), ×100 (c and f), ×200 (b), and ×400 (d).

Figure 2
figure 2

In situ hybridization of RANTES mRNA in the liver cells of patients with chronic hepatitis C and in normal controls. in situ hybridization of RANTES mRNA shows positive cells in the portal area and at sites of piecemeal necrosis (a, b, and c). Positive cells (arrowheads) in focal necrosis (b is higher magnification of area outlined in a) and at sites of piecemeal necrosis (c) at high power magnification. in situ hybridization with sense probes shows no non-specific signals (d). Normal liver cells are negative (e). Slides counterstained with methyl green. Magnification: ×64 (a, d, and e), ×100 (c), and ×400 (b).

T Cell Subsets in the Liver

CD45RA-positive cells (naive T cells) were found mainly in the portal area (Fig. 3a), whereas CD45RO-positive cells (active T cells) were located mainly at sites of piecemeal necrosis in the periportal area (Fig. 3b).

Figure 3
figure 3

Immunohistochemistry of CD45RA and CD45RO in the liver cells of patients with chronic hepatitis C. CD45RA-positive (naive T cells) and CD45RO-positive cells (active T cells) in the portal area (a and b). CD45RO-positive cells (b) are more predominant than CD45RA-positive cells (a) at sites of piecemeal necrosis (arrows), suggesting the involvement of active T cells (a and b). Slides counterstained with methyl green. Magnification: ×64.

Quantitative Analysis of DC-CK1– and RANTES-mRNA Expression

We quantified DC-CK1 and RANTES expression using RT-PCR with SYBR Green I in specific melting curves for β-actin, DC-CK1, and RANTES. Curves for β-actin, DC-CK1, and RANTES constituted straight lines ranging from 102 to 108 copy molecules. The expression of DC-CK1, RANTES, and β-actin in the liver from 40 patients with chronic hepatitis C is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Quantitative Data from 40 anti-HCV Antibody Seropositive Patients

The results showed that both hepatic mRNA levels of DC-CK1 and of RANTES were elevated in liver samples from patients with chronic hepatitis C after correction by comparison with β-actin–mRNA levels. The expression of DC-CK1 and RANTES was minimal in the controls. In contrast, the correlation was significantly positive between DC-CK1/β-actin–mRNA and serum-alanine-aminotransferase (ALT) levels (r = 0.783, p < 0.001) and between RANTES/β-actin–mRNA and serum ALT levels (r = 0.813, p < 0.001) in liver cells from patients infected with chronic hepatitis C. The correlation between DC-CK1/β-actin mRNA and RANTES/β-actin mRNA was also significant (r = 0.786, p < 0.001) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
figure 4

Correlation between serum ALT levels and DC-CK1 mRNA or RANTES mRNA in the liver cells of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Both DC-CK1 mRNA and RANTES mRNA corrected by comparison with β-actin mRNA, are significantly correlated with serum ALT levels (r = 0.783 and 0.813) (a and b). Correlation between DC-CK1/β-actin mRNA and RANTES/β-actin mRNA is also significant (r = 0.786) (c).

RANTES/β-actin–mRNA levels were significantly elevated in patients with chronic active hepatitis C compared with those of controls (normal versus chronic active hepatitis: p < 0.05, by Bonferroni/Dunn analysis), whereas DC-CK1/β-actin–mRNA levels were not significantly elevated (Fig. 5).

Figure 5
figure 5

DC-CK1–mRNA and RANTES-mRNA levels in the liver at various stages of chronic hepatitis C and in controls. DC-CK1/β-actin–mRNA levels do not significantly differ among groups (a), whereas RANTES/β-actin–mRNA levels are significantly elevated in patients with chronic active hepatitis C compared with those with normal livers (* p < 0.05, by Bonferroni/Dunn analysis) (b). CH, chronic active hepatitis; CPH, chrome persistent hepatitis; LC, liver cirrhosis; NL, normal liver.

Discussion

Chemokines are chemotactic cytokines that are classified as either CXC (cysteine-any amino acid-cysteine-motif) (or α) and C-C (cysteine-cysteine-motif) (or β) (Bacon and Schall, 1996; Baggiolini et al, 1994; Hedrick and Zlotnik, 1996; Miller and Krangel, 1992; Oppenheim et al, 1991). The CXC chemokines mainly act on neutrophils, whereas the C-C chemokines target lymphocytes or monocytes (Oppenheim, 1993). Levels of interleukin-8, a CXC chemokine, are elevated in patients with various liver diseases, such as cirrhosis and alcoholic or autoimmune hepatitis, compared with those of normal controls (Sheron et al, 1993). In chronic hepatitis C, IL-8–mRNA expression is also associated with a significant histological activity index (HAI) (Shimoda et al, 1998). Levels of a CXC chemokine, GRO-α, are elevated in the diseased liver, especially in viral hepatitis (Maltby et al, 1996). In contrast, levels of another CXC chemokine, referred to as “human intercrine reduced in hepatomas stromal cell-derived factor 1 /pre-β-cell growth-stimulating factor,” which exhibits in vivo chemotactic activity to neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes in a rat intradermal injection model, are not associated with the HAI in chronic hepatitis C (Shimoda et al, 1998).

Lymphocytes are involved in chronic hepatitis C (Freni et al, 1995; Mosnier et al, 1993, 1998; Scheuer et al, 1992). C-C chemokines attract lymphocytes and may therefore play an important role in chronic hepatitis C. RANTES levels are elevated in viral hepatitis (Maltby et al, 1996). We therefore investigated the involvement of DC-CK1 and RANTES in clinical samples of livers from patients with chronic hepatitis C. DC-CK1 attracts naive T cells and is produced by dendritic cells in the portal area (Adema et al, 1997; Kudo et al, 1997; Prickett et al, 1988). Dendritic cells can present antigen to cytotoxic T lymphocytes (Adema et al, 1997; Hieshima et al, 1997). By contrast, RANTES accounts for the chemo-attractive properties of active T cells, according to results from an in vitro study (Schall et al, 1990). The results from our in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical study indicated that DC-CK1 was expressed in mononuclear cells in association with naive T cell infiltration in the portal area and that RANTES was expressed by the cells adjacent to active T cells at sites of piecemeal necrosis. These results are essentially compatible with those of the in vitro study and suggest that the portal area is the initiation site of immune responses in chronic hepatitis C. The elevated DC-CK1– and RANTES-mRNA levels were significantly associated with a category II (intralobular degeneration and focal necrosis) HAI score (p < 0.05, data not shown). This finding suggests that both chemokines are involved in immune responses to HCV infection because the degree of the category II HAI score may directly reflect the killing of HCV-infected hepatocytes in the lobules by cytotoxic T cells (Kojima et al, 1996; Tanaka et al, 1993). The significant correlation between the levels of the mRNA of these two chemokines and the serum ALT levels, which reflect hepatocyte death, also support this notion. The most striking histopathological features of chronic active hepatitis C are portal lymphoid follicles and periportal inflammation (Mosnier et al, 1993; Scheuer et al, 1992). The follicle comprises a core of B cells mixed with many T-helper/inducer lymphocytes. The outer ring is composed predominantly of T-suppresser/cytotoxic lymphocytes (Freni et al, 1995). This similarity of portal lymphoid follicles to lymph nodes where DC-CK1 mRNA was originally found (Adema et al, 1997) gives support to the idea that the results of the in vitro study can be extrapolated to HCV infection in the liver.

Our study does not provide direct evidence that C-C chemokines activate the portal immune response against chronic hepatitis C in vivo. However, the in vitro results (Adema et al, 1997) exclude the likelihood that the expression of these chemokines is an epiphenomenon associated with portal inflammation. The findings of our study do suggest that DC-CK1 and RANTES play important roles in the immune response to HCV infection in and around the portal area by attracting naive and active T cells.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Forty patients (30 men and 10 women) with various stages of chronic hepatitis C and six controls whose livers were anti-HCV-antibody negative (three with fatty liver, one with a cholangiocarcinoma adjacent to the normal liver, and two with gastric cancers and liver metastases adjacent to the normal liver) were enrolled in this study between 1994 and 1999. Inclusion criteria was the presence of anti-HCV antibodies as determined by a second-generation RIA kit (Dynabot, Abbott Park, Illinois), presence of serum HCV RNA detected by RT-PCR (Amplicore kit, Roche, Basel, Switzerland), and a liver biopsy with histological findings compatible with those of chronic hepatitis (with or without cirrhosis). Exclusion criteria were positive markers of hepatitis B virus infection, a history of daily alcohol consumption of more than 40 g, serological evidence of autoimmune disease (antinuclear and/or antimitochondrial antibodies), and a history of medication at biopsy. Biochemical data were obtained at the time of biopsy. Clinical profiles of these patients are summarized in Table 2. Histological examination of anti-HCV-antibody-positive samples revealed a variable degree of activity and the fibrosis of chronic liver disease. In contrast, all anti-HCV antibody-negative samples showed activity ranging from none to minimal inflammation. Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from all patients and approved by the ethics committee.

Table 2 Clinical and Biochemical Data from 40 anti-HCV Antibody Seropositive Patients (30 men, 10 women) with Controls

Tissue Preparation

Liver biopsy samples were obtained from patients with chronic hepatitis C. For immunohistochemical staining, a portion of each sample was mounted in ornithine carbamoyltransferase, rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80° C. One portion was fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, stained with hematoxylin eosin and Masson’s trichrome, and another was immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, then mounted in ornithine carbamoyltransferase for in situ hybridization. The remainder was rapidly homogenized with a glass rod in one ml of ISOGEN (Wako, Osaka, Japan) and stored at −80° C until RNA extraction and RT-PCR assay.

In Situ Hybridization of DC-CK1 and RANTES mRNA in the Liver

We performed in situ hybridization using digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes to identify the cells involved in DC-CK1 and RANTES production in the liver. RNA probes were generated from cloned pGEM-T (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin) encoding DC-CK1 and RANTES cDNA. Antisense or sense probes were generated by transcription with T7 RNA polymerase in the presence of digoxigenin-labeled UTP (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Indiana). Each RNA probe included 216 base (DC-CK1 nt: 509–724, numbers denoting positions of the nucleotide sequence according to GeneBank accession no. NM002988) and 200 base (RANTES nt:155–354, GeneBank accession no. M21121) fragments, respectively.

Frozen sections (5-μm thickness) fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde were digested with proteinase K (1 mg/ml PBS) (BRL, Gaithersburg, Maryland) at 37° C for 5 minutes, then incubated in 10 μl of hybridization buffer (50% deionized formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 1× Denhardt’s solution, 0.3 M NaCl, 1 mM sperm DNA (Boehringer Mannheim), 500 mg/ml yeast tRNA (Boehringer Mannheim), and 80 ng/ml digoxigenin-labeled cRNA probe at 50° C overnight. The sections were washed in 2× SSC/50% formamide for 30 minutes, then in 2× SSC at 50° C for 10 minutes before digestion with DNase-free-RNase A (500 mg/ml) (Boehringer Mannheim) in 0.5 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.0) at 37° C for 30 minutes. The slides were immersed in maleate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 1% blocking reagent (Boehringer Mannheim) at room temperature for 30 minutes, then incubated in alkaline-phosphatase conjugated anti-digoxigenin-Fab (Boehringer Mannheim) for 120 minutes. Color was visualized with nitroblue, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (BRL), and levamisole in 100 mM Tris buffer (pH 9.5), then the sections were counterstained with methyl green and mounted in 95% glycerol/PBS.

Immunohistochemical Analysis of T Cells in the Liver

Serial sections were immunostained with CD45RA (a marker for naive T cells) and CD45RO (a marker for active T cells) to study T-cell activation. Briefly, 5 μm-thick frozen sections were fixed in cold acetone, then incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-CD45RA (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri) or anti-CD45RO (Sigma) antibodies. Positivity was detected using rabbit anti-mouse IgG antibodies conjugated with alkaline-phosphatase. Each 30-minute incubation period was followed by a 15-minute wash with Tris buffer. Color was visualized, and slides were counterstained as described above for in situ hybridization. Primary antibodies were replaced by mouse ascitic fluid in control samples.

RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from liver biopsy specimens (approximately 3 mg) using acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform (Chomczynski and Sacchi, 1987). Extracted RNA (1–5 μg) and random hexamers (160 pmol; Takara, Japan) were denatured at 70° C for 10 minutes, cooled, and mixed with 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 10 mm DTT, 0.5 mm dNTP, and 200 units of MuLV reverse transcriptase (BRL).

PCR Amplification and Quantification

Rapid thermal cycling and continuous monitoring of PCR products proceeded using a LightCycler (Idaho Technology, Idaho Falls, Idaho). One microliter of the cDNA mix was used as a template for the amplification reaction. Before adding the primers and cDNA, 0.16 μl TaqStart antibody (Clontech, Palo Alto, California) was added to 2 μl LightCycler-DNA Master SYBR Green I (10× concentration) (Boehringer Mannheim) and incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes. The mixture contained 3 mm MgCl2 and 0.3 μm of upstream and downstream primers. The sequences of the primers are shown in Table 3. Amplification and thermal cycling proceeded as follows: initial denaturation at 95° C for 2 minutes, followed by 50 cycles of denaturation at 95° C for 0 seconds, annealing at 55° C for 5 seconds, and extension at 72° C for 20 seconds. Fluorescence signals were acquired from each sample at the end of every extension step for 50 msec. To distinguish specific from nonspecific products, a melting curve was obtained immediately after amplification by holding the temperature at 65° C for 10 seconds followed by a gradual increase to 95° C at a rate of 0.2° C per second. To verify the melting curve results, the PCR reactions were resolved on 1.6%-agarose gels in TBE buffer.

Table 3 Oligonucleotide Primers

We confirmed that the amplified PCR products of β-actin, DC-CK1, and RANTES cDNA were identical to the reported sequences (GeneBank accession number of β-actin: M10277). The products were then purified with Microcon-100 (Millipore, Bedford, Massachusetts) and used as standards. The yields were optically determined and diluted at 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, and 108 copies. The diluted PCR products were amplified as standards for each run.

Histopathological Evaluation

Biopsy specimens were histologically assessed by independent pathologists according to the histological activity index (HAI) as described by Knodell et al (1981) and proposed by Desmet et al (1994) and Ludwig (1993).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Statview 4.0 software (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, California). Partial associations were determined using the hierarchical log-linear analysis in a multiway cross tabulation. Groups were compared by the Bonferroni/Dunn analysis with a multiple comparison test; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.