Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Specification of anteroposterior cell fates in Caenorhabditis elegans by Drosophila Hox proteins

Abstract

ANTENNAPEDIA class homeobox (Hox) genes specify cell fates in successive anteroposterior body domains in vertebrates, insects and nematodes1-3. The DNA-binding homeodomain sequences are very similar between vertebrate and Drosophila Hox proteins, and this similarity allows vertebrate Hox proteins to function in Drosophila4-7. In contrast, the Caenorhabditis elegans homeodomains are substantially divergent8. Further, C. elegans differs from both insects and vertebrates in having a non-segmented body as well as a distinctive mode of development that involves asymmetric early cleavages and invariant cell lineages. Here we report that, despite these differences, Drosophila Hox proteins expressed in C. elegans can substitute for C. elegans Hox proteins in the control of three different cell-fate decisions: the regulation of cell migra-tion, the specification of serotonergic neurons, and the specification of a sensory structure. We also show that the specificity of one C elegans Hox protein is partly determined by two amino acids that have been implicated in sequence-specific DNA binding. Together these findings suggest that factors important for target recognition by specific Hox proteins have been conserved throughout much of the animal kingdom.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McGinnis, W. & Krumlauf, R. Cell 68, 283–302 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kenyon, C. Cell 78, 175–180 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krumlauf, R. Cell 78, 191–201 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Malicki, J., Bogarad, L. D., Martin, M. M., Ruddle, F. H. & McGinnis, W. Development 42, 139–150 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao, J. J., Lazzarini, R. A. & Pick, L. Genes Dev. 7, 343–354 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Malicki, J., Schughart, K. & McGinnis, W. Cell 63, 961–967 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McGinnis, N., Kuziora, M. A. & McGinnis, W. Cell 63, 969–976 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gehring, W. J., Affolter, M. & Burglin, T. A. Rev. Biochem. 63, 487–526 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Salser, S. J. & Kenyon, C. Trends Genet. 10, 159–164 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sulston, J. E. & Horvitz, H. R. Devl Biol. 56, 110–156 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, B. B. et al. Cell 74, 29–42 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, S. G., Chisholm, A. D. & Horvitz, H. R. Cell 74, 43–55 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kenyon, C. Cell 46, 477–487 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Salser, S. J. & Kenyon, C. Nature 355, 255–258 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zeng, W., Andrew, D. J., Mathies, L. D., Horner, M. A. & Scott, M. P. Development 118, 339–352 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Furukubo-Tokunaga, K., Flister, S. & Gehring, W. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 6360–6364 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ekker, S. C. et al. EMBO J. 13, 3551–3560 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Loer, C. M. & Kenyon, C. J. J. Neurosci. 13, 5407–5417 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Salser, S. J., Loer, C. M. & Kenyon, C. Genes Dev. 7, 1714–1724 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sulston, J. E., Albertson, D. G. & Thomson, N. J. Devl Biol. 78, 542–576 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Russnak, R. H. & Candido, E. P. M. Molec. cell. Biol. 5, 1268–1278 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Han, M. & Sternberg, P. W. Cell 63, 921–931 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mello, C. C., Kramer, J. M., Stinchcomb, D. & Ambros, V. EMBO J. 12, 3959–3970 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hunter, C., Kenyon, . Specification of anteroposterior cell fates in Caenorhabditis elegans by Drosophila Hox proteins. Nature 377, 229–232 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/377229a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/377229a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing