Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Hox genes regulate asexual reproductive behavior and tissue segmentation in adult animals


Hox genes are highly conserved transcription factors renowned for their roles in the segmental patterning of the embryonic anterior-posterior (A/P) axis. We report functions for Hox genes in A/P tissue segmentation and transverse fission behavior underlying asexual reproduction in adult planarian flatworms, Schmidtea mediterranea. Silencing of each of the Hox family members identifies 5 Hox genes required for asexual reproduction. Among these, silencing of hox3 genes results in supernumerary fission segments, while silencing of post2b eliminates segmentation altogether. The opposing roles of hox3 and post2b in segmentation are paralleled in their respective regulation of fission behavior. Silencing of hox3 increases the frequency of fission behavior initiation while silencing of post2b eliminates fission behavior entirely. Furthermore, we identify a network of downstream effector genes mediating Hox gene functions, providing insight into their respective mechanisms of action. In particular, we resolve roles for post2b and effector genes in the functions of the marginal adhesive organ in fission behavior regulation. Collectively, our study establishes adult stage roles for Hox genes in the regulation of tissue segmentation and behavior associated with asexual reproduction.


We recently uncovered and characterized the size-dependent behaviors and adult tissue structures underlying asexual reproduction in the planarian, Schmidtea mediterranea1 (Fig. 1a). These highly regenerative flatworms exist in both sexual and asexual biotypes. The latter reproduces solely through transverse fission – an asexual reproductive behavior in which torn posterior tissue fragments regenerate and give rise to clonal progeny2. Fission behavior is size-dependent, and its establishment and regulation coincide with growth-dependent patterning of the planarian central nervous system (CNS)1. Our study also revealed a cryptic form of segmentation that allocates tissue for fission progeny in coordination with the dynamic growth and de-growth of the adult planarian body plan1,3. Presently, the molecular mechanisms mediating this segmentation and its coupling to asexual reproductive behavior are still unknown.

Fig. 1: Planarian Hox genes are required for adult asexual reproduction.

a Diagram of the patterning and behavioral aspects of planarian asexual reproduction. b Fission activity following RNAi against Hox genes. Plot depicts fission progeny number on day 12 of primary RNAi screen (n = 54, 12, and 18 animals for Control#1, Control#2, and all other RNAi samples, respectively; p-value calculated by Welch’s two-tailed t-test versus corresponding control; Control#1 vs. lox5a, post2d, hox4b, post2c, lox4, hox4a, post2a, hox3b, hox3a, hox1, lox5b, post2b p-values = 0.1733, 0.5958, >0.9999, 0.8582, 0.4191, 0.0455, 0.0348, <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001, and <0.0001, respectively, Control#2 vs. post1 p-value = 0.0384). Box and whisker plot depicts individual data points, median (center), 25th/75th percentile (bounds of box), and minima/maxima (whiskers). Source data are provided as a Source Data file. c, d Heatmaps depicting fission activity following RNAi treatment for both the (c) 2-phase primary and (d) secondary Hox RNAi screens. Cumulative fissions over time are displayed for individual worms from each RNAi condition (n = 12 or 18 animals). Source data are provided as a Source Data file. e, f Representative images of animals from secondary Hox RNAi screen on days 0 and 12 of the fission assay (n = 12 animals, three independent repeats). Animals were given nine dsRNA feedings for primary phase I and 12 dsRNA feedings for phase II screening. Animals were given 17 bacterial RNAi feedings for secondary screening. g Representative images and phenotypic frequency of RNAi animals 15 days post-amputation after eight dsRNA feedings (n = 18–53 animals, three independent repeats). Scale, 1 mm.

The ancestral roles of Hox genes, a family of transcription factors with evolutionarily conserved functions in embryonic head to tail patterning, are tightly linked to the emergence of segmented animal body plans4,5. Additionally, Hox gene functions in neuronal development throughout taxa suggest potentially ancient roles in the evolution of the nervous system6,7,8. As asexually reproducing animals, planarians preserve many embryonic developmental programs within their adult tissues, including the ability to establish and maintain the polarization and patterning of the body plan along the A/P axis9,10. We therefore hypothesized that Hox genes play a role in A/P directed tissue segmentation and/or transverse fission behavior underlying asexual reproduction in adult planarians.

There has been a great deal of interest in understanding Hox gene function in planaria. Planarian Hox genes were first cloned over 30 years ago11,12. Since then, multiple studies have characterized the spatio-temporal regulation of planarian Hox genes during homeostasis and regeneration11,13,14,15. With the introduction of RNA-mediated genetic interference (RNAi)16, many investigators made extensive efforts to perturb planarian Hox gene function (both individually and combinatorially) with no discernible phenotypic defects reported15,17,18. Only recently has a requirement for the planarian Hox gene post2d in proper tail regeneration been reported19. Thus, to date, the functions of Hox genes in planaria remain largely a mystery.

In this work, we report functions for Hox genes in the asexual reproduction of the planarian flatworm, S. mediterranea. We identify multiple planarian Hox genes required for adult tissue segmentation and behavior underlying transverse fission. Among these, RNAi-mediated silencing of hox3 genes increases both fission segment number and fission behavior initiation. In contrast, RNAi of post2b eliminates both fission segmentation and fission behavior. Using RNAseq expression analysis and RNAi functional screening, we identify downstream effector genes mediating Hox gene function in asexual reproduction. We find that post2b regulation of effector genes is required for the function of the planarian adhesive organ in the anchoring of the body form to a substrate to initiate transverse fission. Our data support a model in which the coordinate functions of Hox genes regulate asexual reproductive segmentation and behavior within adult planaria.


Planarian Hox genes are required for asexual reproduction

The S. mediterranea genome encodes 13 Hox genes: Hox1, Hox3a, Hox3b, Hox4a, Hox4b, Lox4, Lox5a, Lox5b, Post1, Post2a, Post2b, Post2c, Post2d15 (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). In planaria, Hox genes are dispersed throughout the genome in an atomization of the ancestral cluster4 (Supplementary Fig. 1c). This genomic organization may have implications for Hox gene expression and function in planaria as Hox genes typically display spatial collinearity (correspondence between gene order along the chromosome with domains of expression along the head to tail axis) in other animals20. RNAseq analysis of sexual and asexual planarian biotypes indicates that Hox gene expression increases from embryogenesis to adulthood (10/13 genes) with comparatively minor changes during whole animal regeneration/remodeling21,22 (Supplementary Figs. 2, 3). Despite an absence of genomic clustering, whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) reveals both axially restricted (hox3b, hox4b, lox5a, post2c, and post2d) and radially layered (post2a and post2b) domains of Hox gene expression within adult stage planarians15. Notably, hox3b is enriched in a band of expression anterior to the pharynx in 4–5 mm animals15. This region overlaps with the location of newly arisen fission planes as planarians grow from 3 to 5 mm in length1. Additionally, hox1, hox3a, hox4b, post2d, and post2b exhibit overlapping expression with the cholinergic neuron marker, chat in the planarian brain and nerve cord15. The expression of planarian Hox genes within these axially restricted domains and neuronal cells are consistent with potential functions in the tissue segmentation and behavior underlying asexual reproduction.

We determined the role of each of the planarian Hox genes in asexual reproduction. Individual RNAi of 5/13 Hox genes (hox1, hox3a, hox3b, lox5b, and post2b) in adult stage planaria resulted in a >50% reduction in the generation of fission progeny (Fig. 1b, c, Supplementary Fig. 4a–c). Targeting hox1, hox3a, hox3b, lox5b, and post2b with an extended RNAi treatment in a secondary screen either entirely or largely eliminated fission activity (Fig. 1d, f, Supplementary Fig. 4d). Consistent with previous reports, knockdown of hox1, lox5b, post2b, hox3a, or hox3b did not result in evident morphological changes during growth, homeostasis, or regeneration15,17,18 (Fig. 1e–g). These results identify a set of planarian Hox genes with prominent roles in asexual reproduction.

Role of Hox genes in adult tissue segmentation

We hypothesized that planarian Hox genes regulate the adult tissue segmentation underlying asexual reproduction. We utilized our previously established physical compression assay to reveal the fission planes dividing tissue segments in RNAi animals and thereby determine the respective effects of Hox gene silencing1. Knockdown of hox1 or lox5b had little to no effect on segment number (Fig. 2a, b). In contrast, knockdown of post2b eliminated fission segmentation, while knockdown of hox3a or hox3b resulted in supernumerary segments (Fig. 2a, b). Although simultaneous knockdown of hox3a + hox3b increased fission segment number, it also reduced fission progeny yield (Fig. 2a, b, Supplementary Fig. 4e–g). The increased fission segmentation following hox3 RNAi was slightly biased in the region anterior of the pharynx, coinciding with the expression domain of hox3b15 (Fig. 2c). We reasoned that increasing the number of fission planes dividing the animal should reduce the size of each segment and the resultant fission progeny. We quantified the size of rare fission progeny in hox3 RNAi animals, revealing a decrease in progeny size consistent with the increase in segmentation observed via physical compression (Fig. 2d, e). Altogether, these data indicate that the planarian Hox genes post2b and hox3 are required for A/P tissue segmentation associated with asexual reproduction.

Fig. 2: post2b and hox3 are opposing regulators of adult tissue segmentation.

a Representative images of RNAi animals compressed to reveal fission planes and segmentation (arrows indicate fission planes). b Plot of the number of fission planes/animal length following Hox RNAi treatment (n = 100, 30, 29, 38, 37 49, and 37 animals for Ctl, hox1, lox5b, post2b, hox3a, hox3b, and hox3a + hox3b RNAi samples, respectively; Ctl vs. hox1, lox5b, post2b, hox3a, hox3b, and hox3a + hox3b p-values = 0.9844, 0.9234, <0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001, and <0.0001, respectively; hox3a vs. hox3b and hox3a + hox3b p-values = 0.2696 and <0.0001, respectively; hox3b vs. hox3a + hox3b p-value is <0.0001; sample replicates pooled from two independent experiments with eight dsRNA feedings or 17 bacterial RNAi feedings; at least two independent repeats for each RNAi conditions). c Plot of the difference between the number of pre-pharyngeal vs. post-pharyngeal fission planes following RNAi treatment (n = 41, 17, 18, and 29 animals for Ctl, hox3a, hox3b, and hox3a + hox3b RNAi samples, respectively; Ctl vs. hox3a, hox3b, and hox3a + hox3b p-values = 0.0876, 0.0568, 0.0257; 17 bacterial RNAi feedings). d Representative images of fission progeny following RNAi treatment. e Plot of surface area of fission progeny (n = 45, 15, and 2 fission progeny for Ctl, hox3b, and hox3ab RNAi samples, respectively; Ctl vs. hox3b p-value = 0.002; 17 bacterial RNAi feedings). p-values were calculated by Welch’s two-tailed t-test. Scale, 1 mm. Box and whisker plot depicts individual data points, median (center), 25th/75th percentile (bounds of box), and minima/maxima (whiskers). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Role of Hox genes in asexual reproductive behavior

We next determined the roles of planarian Hox genes in the frequency, duration, and success of asexual reproductive behavior. Using time-lapse imaging, we recorded fission events in Hox RNAi-treated animals1 (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Figs. 5, 6, Supplementary Movies 18). Individual knockdown of either hox1 or lox5b substantially reduced the success of fission behavior (Supplementary Fig. 6b–f, I, Supplementary Movies 2, 5). Mirroring their opposing roles in segmentation, post2b RNAi eliminated fission behavior (Supplementary Figs. 6j, 7b) while hox3a + hox3b RNAi increased fission behavior frequency and duration (Fig. 3b–d, Supplementary Figs. 6g h, 7a, c, Supplementary Movies 6, 7). Individual RNAi of hox3b, but not hox3a, largely phenocopied hox3a + hox3b RNAi effects on fission behavior (Supplementary Figs. 6b–d, g, h,  7c, Supplementary Movies 3, 4). These results suggest unequal levels of functional redundancy for the hox3 genes in the regulation of fission behavior in contrast to their similar contributions to fission segmentation (Fig. 2). Importantly, these results indicate that hox1 and lox5b regulate fission behavior independent of segmentation while post2b and hox3 mediate opposing roles in fission behavior regulation that parallels their roles in segmentation.

Fig. 3: post2b and hox3 are opposing regulators of asexual reproductive behavior.

a Diagram of webcam time-lapse imaging and timeline visualization depicting successful (upward displacement) and unsuccessful (downward displacement) fission attempts. b Representative activity timelines of fission behavior from live imaging of control, post2b, and hox3a + hox3b RNAi animals. ce Plots of (c) total number of fission attempts (Control vs. post2b and hox3a + hox3b p-values = 0.005 and <0.0001, respectively), (d) duration of each attempt (Control vs. hox3a + hox3b, p-value < 0.0001), and (e) percentage of successful attempts for RNAi-treated animals (Control vs. hox3a + hox3b p-value = 0.194). n = 8, 6, and 6 animals for Control, post2b, and hox3a + hox3b RNAi samples, two independent repeats. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. fh Representative images (5 min per frame, A = anterior, P = pre-fission posterior, and P’ = post-fission posterior) of (f) successful and (g, h) unsuccessful fission attempts divided into Phase 1 (Contortion) and Phase 2 (Stretch) for (f, g) control and (h) hox3a + hox3b RNAi-treated animals (experiment independently repeated once). i, j Plots of the duration of (i) Phase and (j) Phase 2 within each fission attempt for RNAi-treated animals (n = 18, 50, and 476 fission events for Ctl Successful, Ctl Unsuccessful, and hox3a + hox3b Unsuccessful, respectively; Ctl Successful vs. Ctl Unsuccessful p-value = 0.0005; Ctl Unsuccessful vs. hox3a + hox3b Unsuccessful p-value < 0.0001). Source data are provided as a Source Data file. k, l Representative images of the (k) entire body or the (l) pre-pharyngeal region of hox3a + hox3b RNAi-treated animal stalled in Phase 1 (n = 10/10 animals, arrows indicate tissues undergoing peristaltic contractions, two independent repeats). Animals were given 17 bacterial RNAi feedings. Scale, 1 mm. Box and whisker plot depicts individual data points, median (center), 25th/75th percentile (bounds of box), and minima/maxima (whiskers). p-values calculated by Welch’s two-tailed t-test. Scale, 1 mm.

Our analysis indicates that planarian hox3 genes have shared roles in the negative regulation of adult tissue segmentation and asexual reproductive behavior. Yet, while hox3 RNAi increases the frequency and duration of fission behavior, these attempts are ultimately unsuccessful (Fig. 3b–e). Therefore, we hypothesized that hox3 is also required at a later stage of the asexual reproduction process. Detailed analyses of fission behavior in control and hox3 RNAi-treated animals revealed two distinct phases of behavior (I and II) common to individual fission attempts (Fig. 3f, g). During phase I, animals elongate their bodies anteriorly in a contorted manner. During phase II, animals further stretch out, thinning and rupturing the fission plane dividing segments to release a tissue fragment. Analysis of hox3 RNAi-treated animals reveals an inability to progress from phases I to II, thus preventing completion of asexual reproduction (Fig. 3h–j). Furthermore, high-resolution time-lapse imaging of hox3a + hox3b and hox3b RNAi-treated animals revealed that phase I contortions are coincident with A/P directed peristaltic contractions (Fig. 3k, l, Supplementary Movies 9, 10). This peristalsis was previously observed in live imaging of fissioning S. mediterranea, and a similar process was observed in fissioning Dugesia japonica1,2. To date, the significance of these peristaltic contractions in planarian asexual reproduction is still unclear. We conclude from these data that hox3 is required for both the initiation and successful progression of asexual reproductive behavior.

Resolving effector genes mediating Hox gene function

Our findings indicate that Hox genes regulate asexual reproduction via the emergence and modulation of A/P segmentation and behavior in adult animals. We previously identified requirements for the Wnt signaling genes β-catenin, apc, dshB, and wnt11-6 as well as the TGF-β signaling genes actR-1 and smad2/3 in the regulation of fission behavior1. Their functions coincided with their roles in the size-dependent patterning of putative mechanosensory neurons expressing gabrg3L-2 and pkd1L-2, genes with roles in the inhibition of fission activity1,23. The interplay between Hox and Wnt signaling is an ancient feature of axial patterning broadly conserved throughout phyla19,24,25. Additionally, TGF-β and/or BMP signaling has been shown to regulate Hox gene expression and collaborate with HOX proteins for target gene regulation26,27. This raises the question as to the extent to which hox1, hox3a, hox3b, lox5b, and/or post2b interact with Wnt/TGF-β signaling in the regulation of asexual reproduction.

We explored the potential interplay between Wnt/TGF-β genes and the identified fission regulatory Hox genes in planarian asexual reproduction. While knockdown of β-catenin alters expression of multiple Hox genes, including hox4b (aka hoxD), lox5a, post2c, and post2d (aka abdBa), there is no significant effect on the expression of hox1, lox5b, hox3a, hox3b, or post2b19,28. Additionally, while the expression domain of post2b along the lateral edge of the animal resembles that of gabrg3L-2 and pkd1L-2, single-cell RNAseq (scRNAseq) analysis indicates that they are expressed within non-overlapping cell clusters15,23,29 (Supplementary Fig. 7e–g). Finally, the RNAi phenotypes of Wnt/TGF-β pathway genes are distinct from that of the identified fission-regulatory Hox genes. Animals treated with hox1, hox3a, hox3b, lox5b, or post2b RNAi lack detectable anterior–posterior regeneration phenotypes (Fig. 1e, g) and knockdown of hox3a, hox3b, or post2b alters fission segmentation (Fig. 2). In contrast, knockdown of fission regulatory Wnt/TGF-β genes yields anterior–posterior regeneration defects and has little to no effect on fission segmentation1,28,30,31,32,33. The lack of an obvious functional integration of fission-regulatory Hox genes into the Wnt/TGF-β pathway motivated a de novo investigation of the mechanism by which Hox genes regulate asexual reproduction.

Hox genes mediate their functions via direct and indirect regulation of downstream effector genes34. To elucidate Hox downstream effector genes regulating asexual reproduction, we devised a two-part strategy to (I) identify putative candidates via differential gene expression analysis and (II) functionally validate their roles in fission (Fig. 4a). RNAseq analysis identified 1724 DEGs following perturbation of Hox gene function (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Data File 1). We selected and successfully cloned 423 putative effector genes into RNAi vectors for functional analysis. We determined the role of each gene in asexual reproduction by scoring resultant fission progeny following RNAi-mediated gene perturbation (Supplementary Fig. 8a, b). We focused on RNAi conditions that phenocopied Hox gene RNAi—i.e., robustly decreased fission progeny (>4-fold reduction, p-value < 0.01) independent of evident alterations to body plan morphology or size (Fig. 1e–g, Supplementary Fig. 4d). Using these criteria, our functional screen identified 24 putative Hox downstream effector genes required for asexual reproduction: ganglioside GM2 activator (gm2a), zinc finger protein 816 (znf816), sterile alpha motif-containing protein (samc), sex determining region Y-box 5 (sox5), carbonic anhydrase VII (ca7), thymine-DNA glycosylase (tdg), dd25334, G elongation factor mitochondrial 2 (gfm2), C-terminal-binding protein 2 (ctbp2), fukutin (fktn), dd13286, plasminogen-1 (plg1), synaptotagmin 1 (syt1), intermediate filament b (ifb), lamin A/C (lmnAC), dd20390, post2a, Fer3-like bHLH transcription factor (fer3l2), BarH-like homeobox 2 (barHl2), Nipped-B-like protein 1 (nipbl), zinc finger MYM-type 2 (zmym2), reticulocalbin-1 (rcn-1), even-skipped homeobox 1 (eve), neural cell adhesion molecule 2 (ncam2) (Fig. 4c, d, Supplementary Fig. 8c–e).

Fig. 4: Elucidation of downstream effectors mediating Hox gene regulation of asexual reproduction.

a Diagram depicting a two-part strategy to elucidate downstream effectors of Hox genes that regulate fission: (I) use RNAseq analysis to identify putative effector genes from the differentially expressed genes in Hox RNAi-treated animals, then, (II) use RNAi to determine the effects of putative effector genes on fission. b Heatmap of 1724 DEGs from RNAseq that are significantly regulated following RNAi of Hox genes. c Heatmap of the top 24/423 genes from RNAi screen of putative downstream fission effectors (see Supplementary Fig. 8) 16–19 Bacterial RNAi feedings. Heatmap depicts normalized fission number on Day 12 across six RNAi-treated worms. Effector genes are color coded with respect to their putative upstream Hox gene: hox1 (red), lox5b (orange), hox3 (green), post2b (purple). Source data are provided as a Source Data file. d Representative images of post2b effector RNAi-treated animals 15 days post fission induction (n = 6 animals, 17 RNAi feedings, two independent repeats). Scale, 1 mm. e Double fluorescent whole-mount in situ staining of post2b effectors rcn-1 and syt1, ifb, or lmnAC (n = 6–7 animals, two independent repeats). Whole animal image (top) and zoom in of posterior lateral section (bottom). Scale, 500 and 100 μm, respectively. f Expression of post2b effector genes detected by whole-mount in situ hybridization in control, hox3a + hox3b, and post2b RNAi-treated animals (n = 4–13 animals, 1 independent repeat). Scale, 500 μm. g Plot of the number of fission planes/animal length following post2b effector RNAi treatment (n = 4, 10, 11, 10, 10, 7, 4, and 17 animals for Ctl, rcn-1, plg, syt1, ifb, lmnAC, post2a, and post2b, respectively; Ctl vs. rcn-1, plg, syt1, ifb, lmnAC, post2a, and post2b p-values = 0.9581, 0.6815, 0.1552, 0.1634, 0.5967, 0.4605, and 0.0001, respectively; replicates pooled from 1 to 4 independent repeats, 21 bacterial RNAi feedings). p-Values were calculated by Welch’s two-tailed t-test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. h Plot of the total number of fission attempts for RNAi-treated animals (n = 14, 5, 5, and 6 animals for Ctl, syt1, post2a, and all other RNAi samples, respectively; Ctl vs. rcn-1, plg, syt1, ifb, lmnAC, post2a, and post2b p-values = 0.0145, <0.0001, <0.0001, 0.0006, 0.0157, and 0.0218, respectively; 21 bacterial RNAi feedings). Box and whisker plot depicts individual data points, median (center), 25th/75th percentile (bounds of box), and minima/maxima (whiskers). p-values were calculated by Welch’s two-tailed t-test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. i Scanning electron micrographs of the lateral edge of the tail containing the marginal adhesive gland in control and post2b RNAi-treated animals (n = 3 animals; representative images; 30 bacterial RNAi feedings; two independent repeats). j Transverse scanning electron micrographs of the marginal adhesive gland in control and post2b RNAi-treated animals (n = 3 animals; representative images; 30 bacterial RNAi feedings; single experiment). Annotations demarcate the dorsal (D), ventral (V), lateral edge (LE), epithelium (E), basal lamina (BL), parenchyma (P), viscid cell extensions crossing basement lamina (arrowheads), clustered (V’) or individual (V) viscid cell glands in the epidermis, and adhesive papillae (A). k Diagram summarizing the roles of the Hox genes as regulators of the adult tissue patterning and behavior required for asexual reproduction (top). Zoom-in panel describing requirement of post2b in the initiation of fission behavior via effector gene regulation in the adhesive cells and anchor cells of the planarian marginal adhesive glands (bottom).

The uncovered effector genes include putative mediators of hox1, lox5b, hox3, hox3b, hox3a, and post2b gene function in asexual reproduction (Supplementary Figs. 4c, 8c). Of note, we identified post2a as a downstream effector gene of post2b. Effects of post2a RNAi in our primary screen were marginal, but an extension of RNAi knockdown (8X vs. 17X RNAi feedings) increased phenotypic penetrance, substantially reducing fission progeny (Figs. 1b, 4c). Of the remaining effector genes, 20/23 have homology to human genes, indicating that planarian Hox genes regulate asexual reproduction by controlling conserved homologous genes rather than planarian-specific genes. Furthermore, identifying a Hox downstream effector gene homologous to ncam2 is noteworthy as N-CAM was the first identified mammalian Hox gene target35. Analysis of the 1000 bp upstream regulatory region reveals the presence of conserved Hox-binding motifs (TTWATKA) in 22/24 effector genes, including ncam2 (Supplementary Data File 2). These findings suggest that planarian asexual reproduction may be mediated by conserved Hox gene/target gene regulatory interactions and illustrate the potential of this experimental paradigm for resolving conserved mechanisms of Hox gene function.

Expression and function of post2b effector genes

To gain insight into the mechanism of action by which Hox genes regulate asexual reproduction, we set out to determine the spatial and cellular context of Hox genes and their effectors. In situ hybridization analysis of Hox gene transcripts poses a significant challenge due to their low expression in planarian tissues15. We therefore utilized published scRNAseq expression data to resolve the cell populations in which Hox genes were co-expressed with their cognate downstream effectors29. This analysis identified overlapping expression for post2b and 11/15 of its downstream effectors (Supplementary Fig. 9a–e). Post2b is enriched in the single-cell clusters smedwi+ PP, non-ciliated neurons 0, parenchymal 6, 8, 10, 13, and epidermal 10 (Supplementary Fig. 9a–e). Consistent with this analysis, published WISH staining confirms post2b expression in a subset of smedwi+ cells, the CNS, and layers of parenchymal and epidermal cells along the lateral edge of the animal15,18,36. Amongst the 11 effector genes co-enriched with post2b, rcn-1 was expressed in smedwi+ PP, and parenchymal-8/13 cell clusters (Fig. 4e, Supplementary Fig. 9a–e, Supplementary Data File 2). The remaining 10 effectors were co-enriched in the parenchymal and epidermal cell clusters: syt-1 and fer3l2 in parenchymal 8/13, eve in parenchymal 6/10, and plg1, ifb, lmnAC, post2a, barHl2, dd13286, and dd20390 in epidermal 10 (Supplementary Fig. 9a–e, Supplementary Data File 2). WISH analysis delineated an inner layer of rcn-1+ syt1+ cells and an outer layer of lmnAC+ and ifb+ cells along the lateral edge of the animals that paralleled publish post2b expression patterns (Fig. 4e, Supplementary Fig. 9f). These scRNAseq and in situ analyses indicate that post2b and its respective downstream effector genes are co-expressed within specific planarian cell populations.

We next set out to determine whether post2b regulated the expression of these cognate downstream effectors within the identified cell populations. We used WISH to analyze gene expression in post2b RNAi-treated worms. Knockdown of post2b, but not hox3, eliminated lateral edge staining of rcn-1, syt1, lmnAC, and ifb (Fig. 4f). These results are consistent with previous reports that post2b regulates ifb expression in planarian lateral epidermal cells18. Notably, RNAi targeting of post2b did not affect rcn-1 expression in parapharyngeal cells outside the domain of post2b expression15. Collectively, this expression analysis indicates that post2b maintains the expression of genes within lateral parenchymal and epidermal cell populations that are required for asexual reproduction.

To gain insight into the mechanism of action of these post2b effectors, we determined whether they were required for segmentation similar to post2b. Surprisingly, RNAi of tested post2b effectors did not phenocopy the loss of segmentation observed in post2b RNAi animals (Fig. 4g). We reasoned that these effectors were instead required for fission behavior. Knockdown of rcn-1, plg1, syt1, ifb, lmnAC, or post2a significantly reduced or eliminated fission attempts, largely phenocopying post2b RNAi (Fig. 4h, Supplementary Fig. 10, Fig. 3b–e, Supplementary Movies 1117). RNAi phenotypes of most effectors were not as strong as that of post2b, suggesting that multiple effectors work in concert to give rise to the post2b phenotype. These findings indicate that post2b-mediated regulation of effector gene expression within these lateral parenchymal and epidermal cell populations is required for fission behavior.

Role of post2b and effectors in the MAG

Our screening analysis identified multiple Hox gene effectors required for asexual reproduction (Fig. 4). ScRNAseq analysis and WISH staining indicate that the effectors required for fission are expressed within multiple cell populations in the adult animal29 (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. 9). These observations suggest that gene function within multiple tissues and cell types, in addition to the CNS, are required for asexual reproduction and even different aspects of fission behavior1. But, in the case of the identified post2b effectors, how are gene functions within lateral parenchymal and epidermal cells required for fission behavior initiation?

Cross-referencing scRNASeq data, in situ hybridization data, and published literature revealed that the lateral parenchymal and epidermal cell populations are mag-1+ viscid gland cells and ifb+ epithelial anchor cells of the marginal adhesive gland (MAG)18,37. Within this duo gland organ, conserved across platyhelminthes, the coordinate functions of adhesive gland cells (viscid gland cells), releasing cells, and anchor cells mediate transient adhesion to substrates38,39. Viscid gland cells within the parenchyme expel their adhesive secretions onto the animal’s surface via long cellular processes that cross the basal lamina and travel through epithelial anchor cells to outer pores surrounded by adhesive papilla38,39. In Macrostomum lignano, RNAi targeting of the anchor cell-specific intermediate filament gene macif1 results in severe morphological alterations in anchor cells and an inability to adhere to substrates39. Assuming conservation of gene functions, RNAi targeting of the anchor cell-specific planarian intermediate filament gene ifb likely compromises the structure and function of the epithelial secretory pore. Furthermore, the post2b effector syt1 is expressed in viscid gland cells and is homologous to synaptotagmin, a calcium sensor for regulated exocytosis40. Additionally, the post2b effect rcn-1, also expressed in viscid gland cells, is homologous to reticulocalbin, a calcium-binding protein of the secretory pathway41. Based on the functions of these homologous genes, we predict that RNAi targeting of rcn-1 and syt1 likely compromises calcium-regulated exocytosis of adhesive secretions from the viscid gland. Notably, RNAi targeting post2b or downstream effectors expressed within the marginal adhesive organ (rcn-1, plg1, syt1, ifb, lmnAC, and post2a) results in animals constantly drifting across substrates while adopting a resting position (Supplementary Movies 7, 1217). This phenotype is consistent with a defect in substrate adherence and inability to stop cilia-driven locomotion and remain stationary. Given that fission behavior begins with the anchoring of the worm’s posterior end to a substrate and requires functional effectors specifically expressed within the MAG, we conclude that control of MAG constitutes a key facet of planarian asexual reproduction.

To investigate the function of post2b in the MAG, we used electron microscopy to characterize the cellular structure of the viscid gland and adhesive cells in post2b RNAi animals. Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of an amputated planarian tail region revealed a distinct mucus stripe along the lateral edge epithelial surface, corresponding to the adhesive secretions of the MAG (Fig. 4i, Supplementary Fig. 11a). Knockdown of post2b eliminated or vastly reduced this stripe of mucosal secretions. Notably, the exposed lateral edge epithelial surface of post2b RNAi animals had expected complements of cilia and microvilli but lacked detectable adhesive papillae. Analysis of transverse sections in control animals resolved parenchymal viscid gland cells extending processes that crossed the basal lamina to connect to adhesive papillae-covered pores on the epithelial anchor cell surface (Fig. 4j, Supplementary Fig. 11b). Consistent with our exterior SEM analysis, post2b RNAi animals lacked a distinct anchor cell region in the lateral margin epithelium and displayed a reduced number of viscid gland cell extensions crossing the basal lamina and terminating at the epithelial surface. Of the few viscid gland cells detected, all lacked adhesive papillae around the pore termini. Altogether, our findings indicate that post2b functions in the MAG are required for initiation of planarian fission behavior.


Our study identifies roles for planarian Hox genes as mediators of adult tissue segmentation and fission behavior in addition to providing evidence that Hox genes function in asexual reproduction. In combination with prior work, our current findings indicate complementary roles for Hox and Wnt/TGF-β genes during planarian asexual reproduction1. The coordinate roles of hox1, lox5b, hox3a, hox3b, and post2b regulate segmentation for progeny tissue allocation, adhesion for posterior anchoring to substrates, and the execution of transverse fission behavior to ultimately separate tissue fragments that will regenerate into clonal progeny (Fig. 4k). In parallel, Wnt/TGF-β activity coordinates growth with size-dependent patterning of fission-modulatory mechanosensory neurons1. Given the preponderance of evidence for the interplay of Hox genes with the Wnt and TGF-β pathways19,24,25,26,27, it would be of interest to further investigate the extent of their interdependence in the regulation of asexual reproduction. Our study also elucidates Hox gene-mediated segmentation within historically designated unsegmented flatworms42. In combination with the discovery of Hox-mediated segmentation in the basal metazoan Nematostella vectensis, these findings support ancient roles for Hox genes in the regulation of body segmentation in addition to their well-established roles in segmental patterning43. Finally, we identify roles for Hox genes in multiple aspects of asexual reproductive behavior, building upon the known roles for Hox genes in developing nervous systems and functions linked with specific animal behaviors6,7,8,44. From cnidarians to deuterostomes, Hox genes play conserved roles in the regulation of axial patterning4,43. Notably, asexual reproduction, via budding or fission, is also distributed throughout these groups and phyla45. We speculate that the regulation of asexual reproduction and/or key genes underlying the neural circuitry or specific cell types utilized in this process represent ancestral and potentially conserved functions for Hox genes.


Animal husbandry

Clonal CIW4 strain S. mediterranea were maintained in 1× Montjuic salts according to standard husbandry protocols1. CIW4 animals were sourced from a large recirculation culture and placed directly into a unidirectional flow system culture for RNAi feeding experiments1,46. The planarian recirculation culture system is composed of three culture trays (96′L × 24′W × 12′H) stacked vertically on top of each other over a sump. Planarian water flows from the sump pump through a chiller, canister filter, and a UV sterilizer into the top tray. Water subsequently flows down drains at the opposite ends of the source through the series of three trays. Water then re-enters the sump where it is filtered through two vertically stacked 400 and 200 μm sieves. Beyond the sieves, water is gravity fed and mechanically filtered through a set of filter/floss pads. Finally, water passes through Water Garden Oasis Pond Matrix and Kaldness media to remove nitrogenous waste. Water is then able to flow back through the chiller, canister filter, and UV sterilizer back into the top tray. For the unidirectional flow system, planaria were cultured in disposable plastic cups lined with a pocket of 150 μm nylon mesh (Saatitech, Italy). Cups were perforated with holes at the desired planaria water level for outflow to complete the flow vessel. These flow vessels were placed in an enclosed container on a perforated tray suspended above a collection basin and centralized waste drain. Planarian water was pumped through spigots directly above the flow vessels. The system actively pumped 2 vessel exchanges of water every 12 h. After RNAi feedings uneaten food was removed.

Gene cloning and RNAi feeding protocol

Gene cloning was performed as previously described but with the following distinctions1. Primer3 version 4.1.0 ( was used to design primer pairs targeting genes of interest, using the Sánchez Alvarado lab transcriptome as a reference. 5′ overhangs were added to ends of both forward and reverse primers to enable downstream Gibson Assembly. Amplified products were designed to be 400–600 base pairs in length. PCR was performed using cDNA as a template. Products were inserted into a modified version of the pPR-T4P vector and transformed directly into Escherichia coli strain HT115. Final cloning products were verified by sequencing. A list of all accession numbers and primer sequences for all the Hox genes and effector genes in this study are available in Supplementary Data File 3. Preparation of dsRNA and RNAi feedings were performed as previously described with the following distinctions1. Purified dsRNA food was prepared by mixing 1 volume of dsRNA at 400 ng/ml with 1 volume of beef liver paste. Bacterial RNAi food was prepared by mixing 8 ml of pelleted bacteria with 120 μl of beef liver. Food was administered every 3 days. Animals were fed from a starting size of <4 mm to a final size of >10 mm. To achieve this, worms were either fed 7–9 times with purified dsRNA food or 16–19 times with bacterial RNAi food as indicated. Control animals were fed RNAi food targeting unc-22.

Fission assay

For fission induction, animals were removed from recirculation or unidirectional flow system, rinsed 10 times with planarian water, and individually placed into wells of a six-well tissue culture plate. The number of fission fragments was scored every 1–2 days. For data analysis, the number of daily cumulative fissions was directly plotted or normalized to the average of the control RNAi fissions where indicated. Fission number was converted to a heat color code for visualization.

Fission segmentation compression assay

Fission segmentation was revealed by compression of worms between a glass coverslip and plastic tissue culture dish. Animals were inverted with their ventral side up, compressed using four fingertips, then imaged. To ensure that all compression/fission planes were revealed for every animal, images were acquired sequentially using a Leica M205 microscope as each fission plane was revealed by mechanical compression.


Images of live worms and fixed colorimetric in situ samples were acquired using a Leica M205 microscope. Fission fragment area was calculated using Adobe Photoshop. Multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) single confocal images were acquired using a Nikon CSU-W1 inverted spinning disk confocal microscope. Fiji plugins were used to stitch tiles for whole planarian images. Following image acquisition, brightness and contrast were adjusted, and the images were rotated and cropped for data presentation.

Live imaging of fission behavior

For all data sets, worms were plated in six-well dishes and imaged in one of two ways. For time-lapse A (Supplementary Figs. 5, 6, Supplementary Movies 15), worms were imaged from above with a single 4k webcam (Logitech Brio). Four inverted LED ring lights (AmScope) mounted above the camera were used for illumination. Images were acquired using an in-house written Python script described previously1. In time-lapses B and C (Figs. 3 and 4, Supplementary Fig. 7, 10, Supplementary Movies 617), images were acquired with a configuration wherein the camera was mounted below a large (2 ft × 2 ft) plexiglass panel that was topped with large white plexiglass panels. The same four LED lights were placed at the bottom of the set-up next to the camera. In this format, a webcam (Logitech c920) was used to acquire images. The time-lapse was acquired using micro-manager version 1.4.22 ( and the opencvgrabber framework. In both cases, the camera gain, exposure, and autofocus were controlled using the Logitech Webcam Controller software (

Videos of individual animals were analyzed, manually annotated, and example frames were extracted using Image J1. Fission attempt initiation was scored at the frame in which a rapid stationary elongation occurred following a period of contraction and immobility. Termination of fission attempt was scored at the frame in which the animal ruptured and released a fragment (successful), or the animal returned to its original pre-elongation state (unsuccessful). Fission events were divided into phase I (initial elongation accompanied by body contortions) and phase II (second elongation accompanied by thinning and/or rupture). Data were visualized with timelines plotted using Graphpad Prism version 9.2.0. Worms that crawled out the well and desiccated during the experiment were not considered for further analysis.

Peristaltic activity of hox3b and hox3a + hox3b RNAi-treated worms was captured using a Leica M205 microscope (acquired at 10 frames per second, Supplementary Movies 9,10).

RNAseq analysis

Control or Hox gene RNAi animals (7× purified dsRNA feedings) were starved for 5 days and snap-frozen for RNA collection (4 replicate samples with three animals each). RNA was extracted using Trizol Reagent, purified and Dnase treated (Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit Cat. No. 74104)46. Libraries were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the TruSeq Stranded mRNA Prep Kit (Illumina). The resulting libraries were purified using the Agencourt AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter) then quantified using a Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) and a Qubit fluorometer (Life Technologies). Libraries were re-quantified, normalized, pooled and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 instrument as High Output 75 bp single read runs using NextSeq Control Software version Following sequencing, Illumina NextSeq Real-Time Analysis version 2.4.11 and bcl2fastq2 version 2.20 were run to demultiplex reads and generate FASTQ files. These FASTQ files were then aligned to the smed_dd_g4 genome using STAR and parameters: --outFilterMultimapNmax 2 --alignIntronMax 5000 --quantMode GeneCounts, along with the Smes_hv_v1 gene models from the Max Plank Institute, obtained via Planmine, to generate read counts to genes47. Differentially expressed genes were determined using the edgeR library in R48. p-Values were adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing by the method of Benjamini and Hochberg49. Cutoff for significant differential gene expression for hox1, hox3a, hox3b, and post2b RNAi versus control RNAi was a fold change of 1.5 and an adjusted p-value < 0.5. Cutoff for significant differential gene expression for lox5b RNAi versus control RNAi was a fold change of 2 and an adjusted p-value < 0.1.

Planarian Hox gene, transcript, and protein sequence analysis

Planarian Hox gene mRNA and amino acid sequences were obtained from Planosphere ( The genomic contig location of planarian Hox genes was determined using PlanMine version 3.0 ( Homeodomains of planarian Hox genes were annotated using Pfam 33.1 ( Homeodomain sequences were aligned via Clustal Omega (

Planarian Hox gene expression

Expression of Hox genes during regeneration and development was obtained from Zeng et al. (2018) and Davies et al. (2017), respectively21,22. Single-cell data and t-SNE plots were obtained from a planarian cell transcriptome atlas (

Data visualization and statistical tests

Heatmaps were generated using Microsoft Excel (version 16.49) and Multiple Experiment Viewer (MeV version 4.8.1). Graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism (version 9.2.0). Illustrations were made using Adobe Illustrator 2020 (version 24.1.3). Images were prepared for figures using ImageJ (version 2.1.0), and Adobe Photoshop 2020 (version 21.1.3). For pair-wise comparisons, significance was calculated using an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction using GraphPad Prism (version 9.1.0).

Whole-mount in situ hybridization

Colorimetric WISH hybridization was performed as follows46. Mucus was removed with 7.5% NAC in PBS for 8 min. Worms were fixed in 4% PFA 0.3% Triton X for 30 min and washed twice with 1× PBS 0.3% Triton-X (PBSTx). Worms were washed twice with PBSTx 0.3%, and then dehydrated with a 50% MeOH:50% PBSTx 0.3% solution, and washed and stored in 100% MeOH O/N at −20 °C. In preparation for sample bleaching, worms were rehydrated with a 50% MeOH:50% PBStX 0.3% wash, washed twice with PBSTx 0.3%, and washed once in 1× SSC. For bleaching, worms were incubated in a 1.2% H2O2, 5% Formamide, 0.5× SCC solution for 3 h over a light box. Worms were washed once with 1× SSC and twice with 1× PBS 0.3% Tween-20 (PBSTw 0.3%). Worms were permeabilized for 20 min with a 1× PBS 0.1% SDS solution containing 1–2 μg/ml Proteinase K (in accordance with worm size). Worms were post-fixed in 4% PFA 0.3% Tw for 10 min and washed twice with PBSTw 0.3%. Worms were prepared for hybridization with a 10 min 50% solution wash and subsequent 2 h 56 °C incubation with a prehybridization solution containing 50% Formamide, 1× Denhardts solution, 100 μg/ml Heparin, 1% Tween-20, 50 mM DTT, and 1 mg/ml Sigma Torula Yeast RNA in 5× SSC. DIG-labeled probes were denatured 5 min at 70 °C, and incubated O/N at 56 °C in a hybe solution identical to prehybe solution but with Deionized Formamide in place of Formamide, Calbiochem Yeast RNA 0.25 mg/ml in place of Sigma Torula Yeast RNA, and an addition of 5% Dextran Sulfate.

The next day non-specific probe binding was washed out at 56 °C. The samples were washed twice for 30 min in a Wash Hybe solution containing 50% Formamide, 0.5% Tween-20, and 1% Denhardts in 5× SSC. Worms were then washed twice in 50% Wash Hybe:50% 2× SSC 0.1% Tw for 30 min, thrice with 2× SSC 0.1% Tw for 20 min, and thrice with 0.2× SSC 0.1% Tw for 20 min. The samples were returned to room temperature and washed twice with 1× MAB 0.1–0.3% Tw (MABTw) pH 7.5. The samples were blocked for 2 h in a solution of 1× MABTw containing 10% Horse Serum and 0.5% Roche Western Blocking Reagent (RWBR) and stained with anti-DIG and/or anti-DNP Fab fragment conjugated to alkaline phosphatase at a 1:1000 dilution O/N at 4 °C. Non-specific binding was removed with washing six times with MABTw for 2–3 h and then processed for colorimetric development. Worms were incubated for 15 min in solutions of 0.1 M Tris pH 9.5, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.05 M MgCl2, 0.1% Tween containing 0%, 50%, and then 80% PVA. The final solution of 80% PVA was supplemented with 1:188 BCIP or 1:94 NBT and worms monitored for color development. The reaction was stopped by rinsing 1–2 times in PBS, fixed in 4% PFA 0.3% Tx for 45 min, and washed three times with PBSTx 0.3%. The samples were then washed with 100% EtOH for 20 min and then with 50% EtOH:50% PBS for 5 min. The samples were the rehydrated with 1× PBS washes and mounted in 80% glycerol.

Double FISH was performed for colocalization analysis of Hox effector genes in whole asexual planarian S. mediterranea51,52. To kill and remove mucus, animals were placed in 5% N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC, Sigma) in 1× PBS solutions at room temperature with gentle shaking by hand for 5 min. To fix, animals were placed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Sigma) in 1× PBSTx 0.5% Triton-x at room temperature for 30 min. The reduction solutions step was skipped to preserve the fragile epidermis of the animals. Animals were bleached with 5% non-deionized formamide, 1.2% H2O2 in 0.5× SSC for 2 h under direct light. Proteinase K treatment (2 μg/ml Proteinase-K, Invitrogen, 0.1% SDS in 1× PBSTx) was performed for 10 min at room temperature, followed by a post-fixation (4% PFA) for 10 min at room temperature. Samples were simultaneously incubated with two riboprobes overnight at 56 °C. Following hybridization, DIG-probes were detected with antibodies (Roche anti-DIG-POD 1:1000) in MABT containing 5% horse serum and 0.5% RWBR. DIG-probes were developed with rhodamine tyramide (1:5000) in Borate Buffer for 45 min. For multicolor FISH, peroxidase activity was killed with 200 mM sodium azide in PBSTw (0.3% Tween). FITC-probes were detected with antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch anti-FITC-POD 1:3000) in MABT containing 5% horse serum and 1% RWBR. FITC-probes were developed in FAM tyramide (1:5000) in Borate Buffer for 45 min. DNA was stained with DAPI overnight in MABT. Lastly, FISH animals were cleared overnight in a modified ScaleA2 solution (20% glycerol, 2.5% DABCO, 4 M urea) prior to mounting and imaging.

Electron microscopy

For exterior SEM amputated tail fragments were fixed in relaxant/fixative as previously decribed53, but modified to 3.4% paraformaldehyde, followed by overnight fixation in cold fixative containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 50 mM cacodylate buffer (pH 7.35) at 4 °C on a nutator. After waiting 24 h, samples were processed with a TOTO protocol54, then critical point dried with a Samidri-795 (Tousimis). Tail fragments were mounted on a stub and sputter coated with 4 nm, Gold Palladium with a Leica EM ACE600. Low magnification exterior SEM images were taken on a TM4000Plus (Hitachi) at 15 kV. Higher magnification exterior SEM images and internal SEM images were acquired on a Zeiss Merlin SEM in analytical mode with a Thermo Fisher Scientific/FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit BioTWIN with Gatan UltraScan 1000 CCD camera. High magnification exterior SEM was acquired with the SE2 detector (3 kV, 100 pA). For STEM imaging, animals were processed as previously described36 and were dehydrated and infiltrated using Hard Plus resin (EMS). Sections (500–100 nm) were cut on a Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome, transferred to a glass slide and post-stained with Sato’s lead and 0.5% uranyl acetate and images with a BSD at 7 kV, 1.2 nA. Both gross brightness and contrast and local contrast were adjusted using CLAHE (blocksize:127, bins: 256, slope:1.5) in Fiji55.

Summary of data presentation and statistics

All data points derived from distinct single measurements of individual biological replicates except for plots of the size of fission fragments or duration of fission attempts wherein multiple distinct data points (not technical replicates) are derived from each biological replicate. p-Values calculated with Welch’s t-test were unpaired, assumed a Gaussian distribution, and did not assume equal standard deviations. Data points were omitted under the following conditions: animal compressions failed due to technical error, animals crawled out of wells and desiccated on lids during the fissioning experiment, and animals recently fissioned prior to recording of animal body length. Details of all statistical analyses performed in Supplementary Data File 4.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The original data generated in this study have been deposited in the Stowers Original Data Repository under accession code LIBPB-1567. The Hox RNAi RNAseq data generated from this study has been deposited in NCBI GEO with accession number: GSE159876. The fission progeny scoring data, compression and fission segment scoring data, fission progeny area calculations, fission behavior scoring data, and animal length measurements generated in this study are provided in the Source Data File. The RNAseq data for Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3 used in this study are available in the NCBI GEO database under accession codes GSE82280 and GSE107874. The scRNAseq data used to generate t-SNE plots used in this study is available at and NCBI GEO: GSE111764 Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availabilty

The fission behavior timelapses were acquired using micro-manager version 1.4.22 ( and the opencvgrabber framework. In both cases, the camera gain, exposure, and autofocus were controlled using the Logitech Webcam Controller software ( Source data are provided with this paper.


  1. 1.

    Arnold, C. P., Benham-Pyle, B. W., Lange, J. J., Wood, C. J. & Sánchez Alvarado, A. Wnt and TGFβ coordinate growth and patterning to regulate size-dependent behavior. Nature. 572, 655–659 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Malinowski, P. T. et al. Mechanics dictate where and how freshwater planarians fission. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10888–10893 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Thommen, A. et al. Body size-dependent energy storage causes Kleiber’s law scaling of the metabolic rate in planarians. Elife. 8, e38187 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gaunt, S. J. Hox cluster genes and collinearities throughout the tree of animal life. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 62, 673–683 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Arendt, D. Hox genes and body segmentation. Science 361, 1310–1311 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Reilly, M. B., Cros, C., Varol, E., Yemini, E. & Hobert, O. Unique homeobox codes delineate all the neuron classes of C. elegans. Nature 584, 595–601 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Philippidou, P. & Dasen, J. S. Hox genes: choreographers in neural development, architects of circuit organization. Neuron 80, 12–34 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Alexander, T., Nolte, C. & Krumlauf, R. Hox genes and segmentation of the hindbrain and axial skeleton. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25, 431–456 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Petersen, C. P. & Reddien, P. W. Wnt signaling and the polarity of the primary body axis. Cell 139, 1056–1068 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Stuckemann, T. et al. Antagonistic self-organizing patterning systems control maintenance and regeneration of the anteroposterior axis in Planarians. Dev. Cell 40, 248–263.e244 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Garcia-Fernandez, J., Baguna, J. & Salo, E. Planarian homeobox genes: cloning, sequence analysis, and expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 7338–7342 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Balavoine, G. & Telford, M. J. Identification of planarian homeobox sequences indicates the antiquity of most Hox/homeotic gene subclasses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 7227–7231 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bayascas, J. R., Castillo, E., Munoz-Marmol, A. M. & Salo, E. Planarian Hox genes: novel patterns of expression during regeneration. Development 124, 141–148 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Orii, H. et al. The planarian HOM/HOX homeobox genes (Plox) expressed along the anteroposterior axis. Dev. Biol. 210, 456–468 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Currie, K. W. et al. HOX gene complement and expression in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. Evodevo 7, 7 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sanchez Alvarado, A. & Newmark, P. A. Double-stranded RNA specifically disrupts gene expression during planarian regeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5049–5054 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Scimone, M. L., Cote, L. E., Rogers, T. & Reddien, P. W. Two FGFRL-Wnt circuits organize the planarian anteroposterior axis. Elife. 5, e12845 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wurtzel, O., Oderberg, I. M. & Reddien, P. W. Planarian epidermal stem cells respond to positional cues to promote cell-type diversity. Dev. Cell 40, 491–504.e495 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tewari, A. G., Owen, J. H., Petersen, C. P., Wagner, D. E. & Reddien, P. W. A small set of conserved genes, including sp5 and Hox, are activated by Wnt signaling in the posterior of planarians and acoels. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008401 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gaunt, S. J. The significance of Hox gene collinearity. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 59, 159–170 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zeng, A. et al. Prospectively isolated Tetraspanin(+) neoblasts are adult pluripotent stem cells underlying planaria regeneration. Cell 173, 1593–1608.e1520 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Davies, E. L. et al. Embryonic origin of adult stem cells required for tissue homeostasis and regeneration. Elife. 6, e21052 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ross, K. G. et al. SoxB1 activity regulates sensory neuron regeneration, maintenance, and function in Planarians. Dev. Cell 47, 331–347.e335 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ryan, J. F. & Baxevanis, A. D. Hox, Wnt, and the evolution of the primary body axis: insights from the early-divergent phyla. Biol. Direct 2, 37 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Guder, C. et al. The Wnt code: cnidarians signal the way. Oncogene 25, 7450–7460 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Walsh, C. M. & Carroll, S. B. Collaboration between Smads and a Hox protein in target gene repression. Development 134, 3585–3592 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Genikhovich, G. et al. Axis patterning by BMPs: Cnidarian network reveals evolutionary constraints. Cell Rep. 10, 1646–1654 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Reuter, H. et al. Beta-catenin-dependent control of positional information along the AP body axis in planarians involves a teashirt family member. Cell Rep. 10, 253–265 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fincher, C. T., Wurtzel, O., de Hoog, T., Kravarik, K. M. & Reddien, P. W. Cell type transcriptome atlas for the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. Science. 360, eaaq1736 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hill, E. M. & Petersen, C. P. Wnt/Notum spatial feedback inhibition controls neoblast differentiation to regulate reversible growth of the planarian brain. Development 142, 4217–4229 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gurley, K. A., Rink, J. C. & Sanchez Alvarado, A. Beta-catenin defines head versus tail identity during planarian regeneration and homeostasis. Science 319, 323–327 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Petersen, C. P. & Reddien, P. W. Smed-betacatenin-1 is required for anteroposterior blastema polarity in planarian regeneration. Science 319, 327–330 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Owen, J. H., Wagner, D. E., Chen, C. C., Petersen, C. P. & Reddien, P. W. teashirt is required for head-versus-tail regeneration polarity in planarians. Development 142, 1062–1072 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Svingen, T. & Tonissen, K. F. Hox transcription factors and their elusive mammalian gene targets. Heredity 97, 88–96 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Jones, F. S., Prediger, E. A., Bittner, D. A., De Robertis, E. M. & Edelman, G. M. Cell adhesion molecules as targets for Hox genes: neural cell adhesion molecule promoter activity is modulated by cotransfection with Hox-2.5 and -2.4. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 2086–2090 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Cheng, L. C. et al. Cellular, ultrastructural and molecular analyses of epidermal cell development in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. Dev. Biol. 433, 357–373 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zayas, R. M., Cebria, F., Guo, T., Feng, J. & Newmark, P. A. The use of lectins as markers for differentiated secretory cells in planarians. Dev. Dyn. 239, 2888–2897 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Pedersen, K. J. Slime-secreting cells of planarians. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 106, 424–443 (1963).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lengerer, B. et al. Biological adhesion of the flatworm Macrostomum lignano relies on a duo-gland system and is mediated by a cell type-specific intermediate filament protein. Front. Zool. 11, 12 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bello, O. D. et al. Synaptotagmin oligomerization is essential for calcium control of regulated exocytosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E7624–E7631 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Honore, B. The rapidly expanding CREC protein family: members, localization, function, and role in disease. Bioessays 31, 262–277 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hyman, L. H. The Invertebrates: Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1940).

  43. 43.

    He, S. et al. An axial Hox code controls tissue segmentation and body patterning in Nematostella vectensis. Science 361, 1377–1380 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Chen, S. K. et al. Hematopoietic origin of pathological grooming in Hoxb8 mutant mice. Cell 141, 775–785 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Sköld, H. N., Obst, M., Sköld, M. & Åkesson, B. Stem Cells in Asexual Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates. Stem Cells in Marine Organisms 105–137 (Springer, 2009).

  46. 46.

    Arnold, C. P. et al. Pathogenic shifts in endogenous microbiota impede tissue regeneration via distinct activation of TAK1/MKK/p38. Elife. 5, e16793 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B 57, 289–300 (1995).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    El-Gebali, S. et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D427–D432 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    King, R. S. & Newmark, P. A. In situ hybridization protocol for enhanced detection of gene expression in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. BMC Dev. Biol. 13, 8 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Pearson, B. J. et al. Formaldehyde-based whole-mount in situ hybridization method for planarians. Dev. Dyn. 238, 443–450 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Dawar, B. L. A combined relaxing agent and fixative for triclads (planarians). Stain Technol. 48, 93–94 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Davies, S. & Forge, A. Preparation of the mammalian organ of Corti for scanning electron microscopy. J. Microsc. 147, 89–101 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank members of the ASA laboratory for discussion and advice and Robb Krumlauf for their comments. We are grateful to the Stowers Aquatics (particularly the Planarian team), Microscopy, and Molecular Biology core facilities for technical contributions and methods development. A.S.A. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) and Stowers Institute for Medical Research Investigator. C.P.A. is a Stowers Institute for Medical Research Postdoctoral Fellow. This work was supported in part by NIH R37GM057260 to A.S.A.

Author information




Conceptualization, data analysis, and interpretation (C.P.A., A.S.A.); acquisition of data (C.P.A., A.M.L., F.G.M., J.O.H., S.H.N., J.J.L.); design, fabrication, and software for planarian live imaging systems (J.J.L.); cloning of RNAi vector library for gene perturbation and screening (F.G.M.); RNAseq Differential Gene Expression Analysis (C.W.S.); writing of the original manuscript (C.P.A.); supervision and funding acquisition (A.S.A.); and revision and editing of the manuscript (all authors).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Thomas Holstein and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arnold, C.P., Lozano, A.M., Mann, F.G. et al. Hox genes regulate asexual reproductive behavior and tissue segmentation in adult animals. Nat Commun 12, 6706 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing