Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The rhythm of microbial adaptation

An Erratum to this article was published on 13 December 2001

Abstract

The evolutionary biologist “studies the steps by which the miraculous adaptations so characteristic of every aspect of the organic world have evolved”1. But the general nature of such adaptive steps is still unclear. Evolution is often thought to be random and dependent on unpredictable events2. In this light, one might expect the steps taken by adaptation to be completely random, both biologically and temporally. Here I present a mathematical derivation to show that, on the contrary, adaptive steps can have fairly strong rhythm. I find that the strength of the adaptive rhythm, that is its relative temporal regularity, is equal to a constant that is the same for all microbial populations. As a consequence, numbers of accumulated adaptations are predicted to have a universal variance/mean ratio. The theory derived here is potentially applicable to the study of molecular evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Variance/mean ratio for numbers of accumulated adaptations plotted against numbers of subsequent contending mutations, j.
Figure 2: Comparing theory with simulations and HIV data (see Methods).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mayr, E. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology 26 (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gould, S. J. Wonderful Life: the Burgess Shale and the Nature of History (W. W. Norton, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8, 269–294 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miralles, R., Gerrish, P. J., Moya, A. & Elena, S. F. Clonal interference and the evolution of RNA viruses. Science 285, 1745–1747 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerrish, P. J. & Lenski, R. E. The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population. Genetica 102–103, 127–144 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection 102–104, 121–123 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1930).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Muller, H. J. Some genetic aspects of sex. Am. Nat. 8, 118–138 (1932).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McVean, G. A. T. & Charlesworth, B. The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Genetics 155, 929–944 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Haigh, J. The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population—Muller's ratchet. Theor. Pop. Biol. 14, 251–267 (1978).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Robertson, A. in Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics (ed. Kojima, K.) 246–288 (Springer, Berlin, 1970).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Barton, N. H. The reduction in fixation probability caused by substitutions at linked loci. Genet. Res. 64, 199–208 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Morgan, T. H. Heredity and Sex (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1913).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Felsenstein, J. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78, 737–756 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Barton, N. H. Linkage and the limits to natural selection. Genetics 140, 821–841 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Otto, S. P. & Barton, N. H. The evolution of recombination: Removing the limits to natural selection. Genetics 147, 879–906 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. de Visser, J. A. G. M., Zeyl, C. W., Gerrish, P. J., Blanchard, J. L. & Lenski, R. E. Diminishing returns from mutation supply rate in asexual populations. Science 283, 404–406 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Miralles, R., Moya, A. & Elena, S. F. Diminishing returns of population size in the rate of RNA virus adaptation. J. Virol. 74, 3566–3571 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Haldane, J. B. S. The mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 23, 838–844 (1927).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hogg, R. V. & Craig, A. T. Introduction to Mathematical Statistics 59–67, 276 (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Feller, W. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications Vol. 2, 346–359 (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1968).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Gillespie, J. H. Population Genetics: A Concise Guide 77–82 (John Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ohta, T. & Kimura, M. On the constancy of the evolutionary rate of cistrons. J. Mol. Evol. 1, 18–25 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wahl, L. M. & Krakauer, D. C. Models of experimental evolution: the role of genetic chance and selective necessity. Genetics 156, 1437–1448 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Orr, H. A. The rate of adaptation in asexuals. Genetics 155, 961–968 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Orr, H. A. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52, 935–949 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. The WHO Network For HIV Isolation And Characterization. HIV type 1 variation in World Health Organization-sponsored vaccine evaluation sites: Genetic screening, sequence analysis, and preliminary biological characterization of selected viral strains. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 10, 1327–1343 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Felsenstein, J. PHYLIP—Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics 5, 164–166 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Korber, B. T. SNAP: Synonymous-Nonsynonymous Analysis Program. Available at http://www.hiv.lanl.gov. (Theoretical Biology and Biophysics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 1998).

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank C. Macken, T. Johnson, P. Sniegowski, A. Orr, D. Chencha, J. Gerrish, P. Baccam, R. Lenski and D. Krakauer for discussions. This work was supported in part by the Postdoctoral Fellowship program at Los Alamos National Laboratories and in part by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development program through financial support to C. Macken at Los Alamos National Laboratories.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Gerrish.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerrish, P. The rhythm of microbial adaptation. Nature 413, 299–302 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35095046

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35095046

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing