Prokaryotic gene therapy to combat multidrug resistant bacterial infection
Gene therapy has multiple applications in human medicine. Its promise is enormous but its application requires refinement including development of more efficacious delivery systems. This editorial will discuss the use of a P1 bacteriophage lethal agent delivery system, LADS (Department of Microbiology/Immunology, Medical University of SC, Charleston, SC, USA), for the treatment of multidrug resistant bacterial infections. This system will use phage-targeting mechanisms to achieve delivery to the offending bacterial population.
In the face of widespread use, antibiotic resistant bacteria have arisen at an alarming rate. For example, Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen prone to develop resistance, and is responsible for about 260000 nosocomial infections in the USA which causes between 60000 and 80000 deaths annually.1 These infections result in an additional eight million hospital patient days per year, costing the USA healthcare system four billion dollars.1 Vancomycin is the last effective antimicrobial available for the treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections. However, vancomycin-resistant clinical isolates have now emerged.2 Like S. aureus, enterococcal infections no longer respond to a vast array of antimicrobials including vancomycin.3 Enterococci account for approximately 110000 urinary tract infections, 25000 cases of bacteremia, 40000 wound infections and 1100 cases of endocarditis annually in the USA.4 In contrast to the acquired resistance of Staphylococci and Enterococci species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibits intrinsic resistance to many structurally unrelated antibiotics.5 P. aeruginosa is the most common Gram-negative bacterium found in nosocomial infections and outbreaks in burns units are associated with high death rates (60%).
Treatment of resistant infections is increasingly hampered either by the prohibitive cost of existing ‘new generation’ agents or the total lack of effective antimicrobials on the market. Streptogamins, the first new class of antibiotic developed for human use in 30 years (Synercid, Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Paris, France) has just been approved by the FDA for treatment of vancomycin- resistant Enterococcus faecium and S. aureus infections.6 However, resistance related to horizontal transmission of SatA (confers resistance to Synercid) has already been documented in poultry which were fed a related streptogamin, virginiamycin.78910 The makers of Zyvox (Pharmacia & Upjohn, Peapack, NJ, USA), the first of a new category of drugs called oxazolidinones, plan to seek approval from the FDA by the end of the year.11 Synercid and Zyvox are last resort drugs and are only effective against Gram-positive infections. Few companies have had the foresight to develop alternative therapies and a race now exists between the development of new effective antimicrobials and emerging drug resistant bacteria.
Currently two biological approaches are being studied as treatments for drug resistant bacterial infection. The oldest is based on administration of lytic bacteriophage. In 1915/1917 Frederick Twort and Felix D'Herelle independently discovered the principle of bacteriophage and attempted to exploit them clinically. Further advances in bacteriophage therapy were largely pre-empted following the discovery of penicillin in 1929 by Alexander Fleming and subsequent demonstration of its therapeutic potential in the 1940s. However, a resurgence of lytic phage therapy is now occurring (reviewed by Alisky et al).12 In 1999 a young woman in Toronto with a S. aureus infection, resistant to extensive antibiotic therapy, was treated successfully with parentally administered bacteriophage.13
The second approach, LADS technology, utilizes a bacteriophage-based in vivo packaging system to create a targeted phagehead capable of delivering naturally occurring molecules with bacteriocidal activity to drug resistant bacteria (Figure 1). The delivery system consists of a transfer plasmid carrying the genes encoding the antimicrobial agents, a plasmid origin of replication, the P1 lytic origin of replication and a minimal PAC site. This plasmid is maintained in a bacteriophage P1 lysogen unable to package its own DNA. The defective lysogen provides all the replication factors needed to activate the P1 origin of replication on the transfer plasmid and all the structural components necessary to form mature virions. The lysogen also carries the c1.100 temperature-sensitive repressor mutation. C1 is responsible for the repression of functions leading to vegetative phage production. Induction of the lysogen by a temperature shift results in multiplication of DNA, packaging of the transfer plasmid into P1 phage heads and lysis of the production strain. Virions are harvested and used to deliver the transfer plasmid to the pathogen. The phagehead contains multiple copies of transfer vector DNA and is targeted to pathogenic bacteria by natural receptor mediated mechanisms. Upon delivery, plasmid DNA recircularises and expression of the lethal agent under the control of environmental, virulence-regulated or species-specific promoters results in rapid cell death. Similar strategies are under development for Gram-positive organisms. Lethal agents delivered by LADS are naturally occurring lethal genes associated with plasmids, bacteriophage, or bacterial chromosomes such as doc, chpBK and gef. A multitude of these genes exists (reviewed in 1997 by Holcik and Iver14). Our laboratory has tested a number of these lethality systems in Escherichia coli. At least one, doc, derived from bacteriophage P115 was experimentally determined to be lethal in E. coli and is either lethal or bacteriostatic in P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and E. faecalis (unpublished observations).
Potentially, phage therapy may encounter the same dilemma that arose from indiscriminate use of antibiotics, namely resistance. There are at least five ways resistance can occur: (1) interference with bacteriophage absorption; (2) prevention of bacteriophage DNA injection; (3) restriction/modification; (4) abortive infection; and (5) superinfection exclusion. One or more of these resistance mechanisms could, in the future, present problems for lytic phage or LADS therapy. However, it has been estimated that there are 4–6 × 1030 prokaryotic cells in the biosphere with approximately 10-fold more tailed bacteriophage particles than cells.161718 Bacteriophage have been evolving with bacteria for 3.5 billion years and thus, although resistance can be demonstrated, evolution of existing phage seemingly continues to overcome resistance mechanisms. Such evolved bacteriophage are readily available to researchers, for example from sewage treatment plants, hospital effluents, or by laboratory manipulation (typically UV exposure) making modification of the LADS therapeutic system possible should resistance arise.
A frequently asked question relative to bacteriophage treatment of humans is the issue of the immune response. Using φX174, it was demonstrated that patients who are immunocompromised appear less likely to mount a response to bacteriophage administration.19 A study performed in Poland confirms this observation.20 From the clinical viewpoint, most septic patients are immunologically compromised. Since LADS therapy will usually be administered over a short time interval the likelihood of an acute immune response occurring is minimal as has been documented in practice for lytic therapy.20
Another concern is rapid clearance of circulating bacteriophage by the reticuloendothelial system. Merrill et al21 developed an animal passage protocol to select bacteriophage able to evade clearance for long periods. Presently, a biotech company (Exponential Biotherapies, Port Washington, NY, USA) has been formed to exploit this observation.
There is a compromise faced by the biotechnology industry relative to the exploitation of lytic phage therapy and involves phage-mediated toxin production, horizontal transmission of unwanted genetic information, or development of resistant phage. First, the issue of toxin production includes: Shiga-like toxins of E. coli, cholera toxin of Vibrio cholerae, and cytotoxins of P. aeruginosa. For example, phage K139 confers to V. cholera a gene product that enhances enzymatic activity of cholera toxin. Horizontal exchange of virulence genes and/or antibiotic resistance will also occur and has been regularly observed during evolution of bacteria and their cognate phages.22 These issues are less likely to be relevant for LADS because the agent acts rapidly to kill offending bacteria, is nonreplicating reducing the risk of resistance and essentially eliminates the issue of horizontal gene transfer. This contrasts with lytic therapy where the phage genome replicates and reinfects risking lysogenic conversion and development of resistance.
In the late 1990s, the market for antimicrobial therapeutics for human infectious disease was estimated at ten billion dollars per year in the USA and twenty-five billion worldwide. Thus, for the pharmaceutical industry the sales potential for drugs to treat infectious diseases is very large. The indiscriminate use of antibiotics over the last 70 years has lead to the emergence of resistant bacteria. Few new antibiotics in the developmental pipeline are predicted to overcome existing resistance mechanisms. The LADS therapeutic, based on sound bacteriophage principles, will be administered over a short duration to patients who fail antibiotics. Once the therapeutic is injected by the phagehead, it kills the bacterium quickly, limiting patient exposure thereby reducing development of bacterial resistance and deleterious horizontal gene transfer. We expect to have this prokaryotic gene therapy in clinical trials within 18 months.
References
Windhover Information Incorporated Drug resistance start-ups: is resistance futile?www.windhoverinfo.com1998
Hiramatsu K . Reduced susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to vancomycin – Japan 1996 Morb Mort Week Rep 1997 46: 624–626
Woodford N . Glycopeptide-resistant enterococci: a decade of experience J Med Microbiol 1998 47: 849–862
Huycke MM et al. Multiple-drug resistant enterococci: the nature of the problem and an agenda for the future Emerg Infec Dis 1998 4: 239–249
Stanislavsky ES, Lam JS . Pseudomonas aeruginosa antigens as potential vaccines FEMS Microbiol Rev 1997 21: 243–277
Food and Drug Administration Final Labeling 9/21/99 Synercid i.v. (quinupristin and dalfopristin for injection).http://www.fda.gov1999
Wegener HC et al. Use of antimicrobial growth promoters in food animals and Enterococcus faecium resistance to therapeutic antimicrobial drugs in Europe Emerg Infec Dis 1999 5: 329–335
Welton LA et al. Antimicrobial resistance in enterococci isolated from turkey flocks fed virginiamycin Antimicrob AgentsChemother 1998 42: 705–708
Van den Bogaard AE et al. High prevalence of colonization with vancomycin and pristinamycin-resistant enterococci in healthy humans and pigs in The Netherlands: is the addition of antibiotics to animal feeds to blame? Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997 40: 454–456
Aarestrup FM et al. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from food animals to growth promoters and related therapeutic agents in Denmark APMIS 1998 106: 606–622
CNN Transcripts. Aired September 28, 11.00 am ET. http://cnn.com 1999
Alisky J et al. Bacteriophages show promise as antimicrobial agents J Infec 1998 36: 5–15
Irwin A . ‘Superbug’ victim saved by killer virus treatment Electronic Telegraph UK News 1999; September 17
Holcik M, Iyer VN . Conditionally lethal genes associated with bacterial plasmids Microbiology 1997 143: 3403–3416
Lehnherr H et al. Plasmid addiction genes of bacteriophage P1: doc, which causes cell death on curing of prophage, and phd, which pervents host death when prophage is retained J Mol Biol 1993 233: 414–428
Whitman WB et al. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998 95: 6578–6583
Casjens S et al. Evolution of dsDNA tailed-bacteriophage genomes Semin Virol 1992 3: 383–397
Hendrix RW et al. Evolutionary relationships among diverse bacteriophages and prophages: all the world's a phage Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999 96: 2192–2197
Ochs HD et al. Immunologic responses to bacteriophage φX174 in immunodeficiency diseases J Clin Invest 1971 50: 2559–2568
Kucharewicz-Krukowska A, Slopek S . Immunogenic effect of bacteriophage in patients subjected to phage therapy Archiv Immunol Therap Exp 1987 35: 553–561
Merril CR et al. Long-circulating bacteriophage as antibacterial agents Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996 93: 3188–3192
Sandmeier H . Acquisition and rearrangement of sequence motifs in the evolution of bacteriophage tail fibres Mol Microbiol 1994 12: 343–350
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Michael Schmidt PhD, Joseph Dolan PhD, Carwile LeRoy MD and Laura Kasman PhD for reading this editorial prior to submission. Special thanks to Janie Nelson for typing this editorial and composing the figure. Supported by a research contract with Hexal AG, Holtzkirken, FDR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Norris, J., Westwater, C. & Schofield, D. Prokaryotic gene therapy to combat multidrug resistant bacterial infection. Gene Ther 7, 723–725 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3301178
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3301178