Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Scientific Correspondence
  • Published:

Tight knot values deviate from linear relations

Abstract

Applications of knots to the study of polymers have emphasized geometric measures on curves such as ‘energy’1,2,3,4 and ‘rope length’5,6,7, which, when minimized over different configurations of a knot, give computable knot invariants related to physical quantities8. In DNA knots, electrophoretic mobility appears to be correlated with the average crossing number of rope-length-minimizing configurations9, and a roughly linear empirical relation has been observed between the crossing number and rope length10. Here we show that a linear relation cannot hold in general, and we construct infinite families of knots whose rope length grows as the 3/4 power of the crossing number11. It can be shown that no smaller power is possible12,13,14.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Construction for links with rope length L growing as the 3/4 power of crossing number C.

References

  1. O'Hara, J. Topology 30, 241–247 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Freedman, M. H., He, Z.-X., & Wang, Z. Ann. Math. 139, 1–50 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, D. & Kusner, R. Exp. Math. 2, 1–9 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kusner, R. B. & Sullivan, J. M. in Geometric Topology (ed. Kazez, W. H.) 570-604 (Am. Math. Soc./Int. Press, Providence, 1997).

  5. Kusner, R. B. & Sullivan, J. M. in Topology and Geometry in Polymer Science (eds Whittington, S., Sumners, D. & Lodge, T.) 67-78 (Springer, New York, 1998).

  6. Litherland, R. A., Simon, J., Durumeric, O. & Rawdon, E. Topol. Appl. (in the press).

  7. Nabutovsky, A. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 48, 381–428 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moffatt, H. K. Nature 384, 114 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stasiak, A., Katritch, V., Bednar, J., Michoud, D. & Dubochet, J. Nature 384, 122 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Katritch, V. et al. Nature 384, 142–145 (1996).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cantarella, J., Kusner, R. B. & Sullivan, J. M. (Preprint, Dept of Mathematics, Univ. of Illinois, 1997).

  12. Cantarella, J., DeTurck, D. & Gluck, H. (Preprint, Dept of Mathematics, Univ. of Pennsylvania, 1997).

  13. Freedman, M. H. & He, Z.-X. Ann. Math. 134, 189–229 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buck, G. & Simon, J. Topol. Appl. (in the press).

  15. Murasagi, K. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 237-260 (1991).

  16. Diao, Y. & Ernst, C. Topol. Appl. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cantarella, J., Kusner, R. & Sullivan, J. Tight knot values deviate from linear relations. Nature 392, 237–238 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/32558

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/32558

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing