Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Selectivity of extinction among sea urchins at the end of the Cretaceous period

Nature volume 392, pages 69–71 (1998)Cite this article

Abstract

By compiling large databases and searching for environmental and palaeobiological correlates associated with survival, insight can be gained into the driving mechanisms involved in mass extinctions1,2,3,4. Although this approach lacks precise temporal resolution and thus cannot be used to investigate how rapidly extinction took place, it provides a broad overview, less plagued by sampling problems caused by shifting facies. Here we present a global analysis of a major marine invertebrate group, the sea urchins, which suffered 36% extinction at genus level in the late Maastrichtian age and continuing high levels of extinction in the Danian age. No preferential survivorship was found for clades with widespread distribution, but there was a strong correlation between feeding strategy and survivorship at the end of the Cretaceous period. Surprisingly, however, clades whose larvae must feed to reach metamorphosis were not significantly harder hit than those with non-feeding larval development. Our results indicate that nutrient supply was a crucial factor in driving K/T-boundary extinctions, with selection more strongly focused on benthic adult than on larval planktotrophic stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Genera of echinoids with last occurrences in the late Maastrichtian and Danian.
Figure 2: Proportions of Maastrichtian clades surviving into the Danian or becoming extinct.
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jablonski, D. Mass extinctions: persistent problems and new directions. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 307, 1–9 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jablonski, D. in Dynamics of Extinction (ed. Elliott, D. K.) 183–229 (Wiley, New York, (1986)).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jablonski, D. & Raup, D. M. Selectivity of end-Cretaceous marine bivalve extinction. Science 268, 389–391 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jablonski, D. Progress at the K–T boundary. Nature 387, 354–355 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, A. B. & Jeffery, C. H. Fossil echinoids of the Maastrichtian and Palaeocene: an illustrated key. Spec. Pap. Palaeont. (submitted).

  6. Sheehan, P. M., Coorough, P. J. & Fastovsky, D. E. Biotic selectivity during the K/T and late Ordovician extinction events. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 307, 477–489 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johansen, M. B. Background extinction and mass extinction of the brachiopods from the chalk of northwest Europe. Palaios 4, 243–250 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. De Ridder, C. & Lawrence, J. M. in Echinoderm Nutrition (eds Jangoux, M. & Lawrence, J. M.) (Balkema, Rotterdam, (1982)).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, A. B. The structure, function and evolution of tube feet and ambulacral pores in irregular echinoids. Palaeontology 23, 39–83 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Telford, M. & Mooi, R. Podial particle picking in Cassidulus caribaearum (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) and the phylogeny of sea urchin feeding mechanism. Biol. Bull. 191, 209–223 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rose, E. P. F. Some observations on the recent holectypoid echinoid Echinoneus cyclostomus and their palaeoecological significance. Thalass. Jugoslav. 12, 299–306 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Valentine, J. W. & Jablonski, D. Mass extinctions: sensitivity of marine larval types. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 6912–6914 ((1986)).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Levinton, J. S. Trophic group and the end-Cretaceous extinction: did deposit feeders have it made in the shade? Paleobiology 22, 104–112 ((1996)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Summerhayes, C. P. & Thorpe, S. A. Oceanography, an Illustrated Guide (Manson, London, (1996)).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barrera, E. Global environmental change preceding the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary: Early–late Maastrichtian transition. Geology 22, 877–880 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Macleod, N. et al. The Cretaceous–Tertiary biotic transition. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 154, 265–292 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeffery, C. H. Dawn of echinoid nonplanktotrophy: coordinated shifts in development indicate environmental instability prior to the K–T boundary. Geology 25, 991–994 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. D'Hondt, S., Herbert, T. D., King, J. & Gibson, C. Planktonic foraminifera, asteroids, and marine production: death and recovery at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 307, 303–317 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Foote, J. Young, C. Marshall, P. Ward and J. Levinton for their comments on this paper. Research was supported by a NERC research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK

    Andrew B. Smith & Charlotte H. Jeffery

Authors
  1. Andrew B. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Charlotte H. Jeffery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew B. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, A., Jeffery, C. Selectivity of extinction among sea urchins at the end of the Cretaceous period. Nature 392, 69–71 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/32155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/32155

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing