Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evidence for a conservative pathway of transposition of bacteriophage Mu

Abstract

During its lytic cycle bacteriophage Mu uses repeated transposition as a mode of DNA synthesis. These transpositional events are undoubtedly replicative, and presumably semi-conservative. In a Mu lysogen this type of transposition can start immediately after prophage induction. However, in an infective cycle the Mu genome (which is injected into the host cell as a linear molecule flanked by short random sequences of bacterial DNA) must first become integrated into the host chromosome. Little is known about how this occurs apart from the fact that the bacterial sequences at either end of the Mu genome are lost in the process1. The integration is thus similar to a transposition event. In an attempt to determine whether this type of Mu transposition (between a linear donor molecule and a circular recipient) is also semi-conservative we have analysed the progeny phage arising from an infective cycle in which the parental DNA was heterozygous for a known genetic marker. The expectation is that if integration of the infecting Mu genome occurs by a single semi-conservative transpositional event then pure phage bursts should be produced as the genetic information on only one strand would be preserved throughout the lytic cycle. The experiments reported here do not support this expectation in that the infected cells yield mixed bursts, suggesting that Mu integration is a conservative, rather than a semi-conservative event.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hsu, M. T. & Davidson, N. Virology 58, 229–240. (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Spatz, H. Ch. & Trautner, T. A. Molec. gen. Genet. 109, 84–106 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wildenberg, J. & Meselson, M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 2202–2206 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahmann, R., Kamp, D. & Zipser, D. Molec. gen. Genet. 149, 323–328 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maynard-Smith, S., Leach, D., Coelho, A., Carey, J. & Symonds, N. Plasmid 4, 34–50 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coelho, A., Leach, D., Maymard-Smith, S. & Symonds, N. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 45, 323–328 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liebart, J. C., Ghelardini, P. & Paolozzi, L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 4362–4366 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van de Putte, P., Westmaas, G. C. & Wijffelman, C. Virology 81, 152–159 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akroyd, J., Symonds, N. Evidence for a conservative pathway of transposition of bacteriophage Mu. Nature 303, 84–86 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/303084a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/303084a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing