Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Monoclonal antibody to Lyt 2 antigen blocks H–2I- and H–2K- specific mouse cytotoxic T cells

Abstract

It has been proposed that the murine cell surface antigen Lyt 2 could serve to distinguish cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and their immediate precursors, which bear Lyt 2, from helper T cells, which do not1. Later work, however, has demonstrated that Lyt 2+ cells can ‘help’ B cells mature into antibody-secreting cells, provided that the B cells differ from the allo-helper T cells at the K or D region of the H–2 major histocompatibility complex (MHC)2. Furthermore, a T-cell line has recently been described which is Lyt 2 but specifically cytotoxic for H–2I region determinants3,4. These new findings have prompted an alternative hypothesis, that Lyt 2 antigen does not discriminate between cytotoxic and non-cytotoxic (helper) T cells, but rather between I-region- and K/D-region-specific cells5. In this new view, the apparent association between presence of Lyt 2 antigen and killer T-cell function merely reflects the tendency, by no means absolute6–8, for CTLs to recognize K- or D- rather than I-region determinants9. We show here that I-region-specific murine CTLs, generated in primary in vitro culture, do in fact bear the Lyt 2 antigen, as do CTLs directed against the K region of H–2.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cantor, H. & Boyse, E. A. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 41, 23–31 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Swain, S. L. & Panfili, P. R. J. Immun. 122, 383–391 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Swain, S. L., Dennert, G., Wormsley, S. & Dutton, R. Eur. J. Immun. 11, 175–180 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dennert, G., Swain, S. L., Waterfield, J. D., Warner, J. F. & Dutton, R. W. Eur. J. Immun. 11, 62–64 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Swain, S. L. Fedn Proc. 39, 3110–3113 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner, H., Gotze, D., Ptschelinew, L. & Rollinghof, M. J. exp. Med. 142, 1477–1487 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Klein, J., Chiang, C. L. & Hauptfeld, V. J. exp. Med. 145, 450–454 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. deWaal, L. P., Melief, C. J. M. & Melvold, R. W. Eur. J. Immun. 11, 258–265 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Klein, J. Springer Seminars in Immunopathology Vol. 1, 31–49 (Springer, Berlin, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nakayama, E., Shiku, H., Stockert, E., Oettgen, H. F. & Old, L. J. Proc natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 1977–1981 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shinohara, N. & Sachs, D. H. J. exp. Med. 150, 432–444 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hollander, N., Pillemer, E. & Weissman, I. L. J. exp. Med. 152, 674–687 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fan, J., Ahmed, A. & Bonavida, B. J. Immun. 125, 2444 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Altman, P. L. & Katz, D. D. (eds) in Inbred and Genetically Defined Strains of Laboratory Animals. Pt. 1. Mouse and Rat, 125–127 (Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Bethesda, 1979).

  15. Ledbetter, J. A. & Herzenberg, L. A. Immun Rev. 47, 63–90 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shen, F. -W., Boyse, E. A. & Cantor, H. Immunogenetics 2, 591–595 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gottlieb, P. D. J. exp. Med. 140, 1432–1437 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Glasebrook, A. L. et al. Immun. Rev. 54, 225–266 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Giorgi, J. V. & Warner, N. L. J. Immun. 126, 322–330 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vidovic, D., Juretic, A., Nagy, Z. A. & Klein, J. Eur. J. Immun. 11, 499–504 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Baker, P. E., Gillis, S., Ferm, M. M. & Smith, K. A. J. Immun. 121, 2168–2173 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wagner, H., Rollinghof, M., Pfizenmaier, K., Hardt, C. & Johnscher, G. J. Immun. 124, 1058–1067 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Okada, M. & Henney, C. S. J. Immun. 125, 300–307 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Andrus, L., Prowse, S. J. & Lafferty, K. J. Behring Institute Mitteilungen 67, 61–67 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miller, R. A. & Stutman, O. Cell. Immun. (in the press).

  26. Mage, M. G., McHugh, L. L. & Rothstein, T. L. J. immun. Meth. 15, 47–56 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, R., Stutman, O. Monoclonal antibody to Lyt 2 antigen blocks H–2I- and H–2K- specific mouse cytotoxic T cells. Nature 296, 76–78 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/296076a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/296076a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing