Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Scientific Correspondence
  • Published:

Object recognition can drive motion perception

Abstract

When two spatially separated spots of light are flashed in rapid succession, apparent motion is seen between them1,2,3. We extended this phenomenon by photographing a face and producing from it a fragmented ‘puzzle picture’ or ‘Mooney face’ in which the face is not initially visible (Fig. 1, left; frame 1) but is seen after 15 to 60 seconds4. Another photograph of the same face seen in profile was used to produce a second Mooney face (Fig. 1, right; frame 2). When the two images were alternated, naive subjects at first saw random, incoherent, two-dimensional (2D) motion between the fragments. But once the face was recognized, it was perceived to rotate unambiguously in three dimensions. We conclude that complex image tokens set up by perceptual learning can drive perception of apparent motion.

Left, frame 1; right, frame 2. A demonstration can be produced by showing the two frames alternately as an upside-down movie; nearly all subjects see 2D movement. But if the same movie is viewed upright or the subjects are told it is a face, they invariably see rigid 3D rotation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Helmhotz, H. L. F. von Handbuch der Psysiologischen Optik (Leipzig, 1867).

  2. Kolers, P. Aspects of Motion Perception (Pergamon, New York, 1972).

  3. Ramachandran, V. S. & Anstis, S. M. Sci. Am. 254, 102–109 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tovee, M. J., Rolls, E. T. & Ramachandran, V. S. Neuroreport 7, 2757–2760 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zeki, S. M. Nature 274, 423–428 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Allman, J. in Oxford Companion to the Mind (ed. Gregory, R. L.) (Oxford Univ. Press, 1987).

  7. Livingstone, M. S. & Hubel, D. H. J. Neurosci. 7, 3416–3468 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Essen, D. C. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 227–263 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bruner, J. Psychol. Rev. 64, 123–152 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mikami, A., Newsome, W. T. & Wurtz, R. H. J. Neurophysiol. 55, 1308–1327 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ramachandran, V. S. & Inada, V. Spatial Vis. 1, 57–67 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marr, D. Vision (Freedom, San Francisco, 1982).

  13. Ullman, S. The Interpretation of Visual Motion (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1979).

  14. Gregory, R. L. The Intelligent Eye (McGraw Hill, New York, 1970).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramachandran, V., Armel, C., Foster, C. et al. Object recognition can drive motion perception. Nature 395, 852–853 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/27573

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/27573

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing