Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Inhibitory effect of dibutyryl cyclic AMP and theophylline on the aggregation of human breast tumour cell line BT-20

Abstract

DISSOCIATED cells from embryos are able to reaggregate to form multicellular structures resembling those of the original tissue1,2, this ability being inversely proportional to the age of the embryo1,3 or to the age of the cells in tissue culture4. This intracellular adhesion is tissue specific, and is believed to have a key role in growth and morphological differentiation5. It has also been noted that many tumour cell lines can reaggregate in the same condition as embryonic cells6–10. Leighton has observed the formation of small aggregates when tumour cells were grown in cellulose sponge11. He directs attention to the fact that many clinical carcinomas appear as aggregates or nests of cells, and suggests that factors intrinsic to the formation of aggregates are involved in the spread of cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moscona, A. A., Expl Cell Res., 22, 455–475 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moscona, A. A., Devl Biol., 18, 250–277 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grover, J. W., Expl Cell Res., 24, 171–173 (1961); 26, 344–359 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Azencott, R., and Courtois, Y., Expl Cell Res., 86, 69–74 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaze, R. M., A. Rev. Physiol., 29, 59–86 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moskowitz, M., Nature, 200, 854–856 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sutherland, R. M., McCredie, J. A., and Inch, W. R., J. natn. Cancer Inst., 46, 113–120 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arata, T., and Okijaki, T., J. natn. Cancer Inst., 49, 1445–1447 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Takaoka, T., Katsuta, H., and Akatsuka, T., Jap. J. exp. Med., 45, 299–312 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishimaru, Y., Ishihara, H., and Hayashi, H., Br. J. Cancer, 31, 207–217 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leighton, J., Kalla, R. L., Turner, J. M., and Fennell, R. H., Cancer Res., 20, 575–586 (1960).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Willingham, M. C., and Pastan, I., J. Cell Biol., 63, 288–294 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kurth, R., and Bauer, H., Nature new Biol., 243, 243–245 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsie, A. W., and Puck, T. T., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 68, 358–361 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sheppard, J. R., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 68, 1316–1320 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, G. S., and Pastan, I., Nature new Biol., 236, 247–249 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grinnell, F., Milam, M., and Srere, P. A., Nature new Biol., 241, 82–83 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lasfargues, E. Y., and Ozzello, L., J. natn. Cancer Inst., 21, 1131–1144 (1958).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wright, J. A., Expl Cell Res., 78, 456–460 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Abell, C. W., and Monahan, T. M., J. Cell Biol., 59, 549–558 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Orr, C. W., and Roseman, S., J. Membr. Biol., 1, 109–124 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuroda, Y., Expl Cell Res., 84, 303–310 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Armstrong, P. B., J. Cell Biol., 47, 197–210 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Overton, J., J. exp. Zool., 185, 341–356 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson, R., Hammer, M., Sheridan, J., and Revel, J. P., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 4536–4540 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hausman, R. E., and Moscona, A. A., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 3111–3114 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Oppenheimer, S. B., and Humphreys, T., Nature, 232, 125–127 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Balsamo, J., and Lilien, J., Nature, 251, 522–524 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuhns, W. J., Weinbaum, G., Turner, R., and Burger, M. M., Humoral Control of Growth and Differentiation (edit. by LoBuc, J., and Gordon, A. S.), 2, 59–79, (Academic, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bryant, R. E., and Sutcliffe, M. C., J. clin. Invest., 54, 1241–1244 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Salzman, E. W., New Engl. J. Med., 286, 358–363 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Leighton, J., Cancer Res., 29, 2457–2465 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

TCHAO, R., LEIGHTON, J. Inhibitory effect of dibutyryl cyclic AMP and theophylline on the aggregation of human breast tumour cell line BT-20. Nature 259, 220–222 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/259220a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/259220a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing