Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Persistence of Dose Related Behaviour in Mice

Abstract

IF naive rats are injected with an amphetamine–barbiturate mixture similar to ‘Drinamyl’ and are tested in an unfamiliar environment—a Y-shaped runway—their spontaneous activity is about double that of controls given only saline1. If, after testing, the rats are returned to their home cages and retested in the runway without drugs, about half of the stimulant effect of the drug mixture can still be detected as much as 3 months later2,3. This is surprising, for significant amounts of the individual drugs or of any known metabolites are unlikely to be present in the animals' brains for longer than at most 48 h4,5, though as far as we know information of this kind is not available for mixtures of the drugs. In any case, no such behavioural after-effects can be detected after one or a series of “passive” administrations of the drugs, whereby the rats are merely injected and replaced in the home cage without being tested3 (R. D. Porsolt, unpublished results and refs. 6 and 7). Only when drug administration is combined with an actual test experience do these long term after-effects seem to occur. In the conditions described they are consistent and reliable and are presumably due to some more or less permanent changes in the organism, which are induced by the first drug/environment experience and which affect subsequent behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rushton, R., Steinberg, H., and Tinson, C., Nature, 192, 533 (1961).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rushton, R., Steinberg, H., and Tinson, C., Brit. J. Pharmacol., 20, 99 (1963).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rushton, R., Steinberg, H., and Tomkiewicz, M., Nature, 220, 885 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Groppetti, A., and Costa, E., Intern. J. Neuropharmacol., 8, 209 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Van der Kleijn, E., Arch. Pharmacodyn. Ther., 178, 193 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Porsolt, R. D., Joyce, D., and Summerfield, A., Nature, 223, 1277 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Porsolt, R. D., Joyce, D., and Summerfield, A., Nature, 227, 285 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rushton, R., and Steinberg, H., Nature, 211, 1312 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rushton, R., and Steinberg, H., Brit. J. Pharmacol., 21, 295 (1963).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bradley, D. W. M., Joyce, D., Murphy, E. H., Nash, B. M., Porsolt, R. D., Summerfield, A., and Twyman, W. A., Nature, 220, 187 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boissier, J. R., and Simon, P., Thérapie, 17, 1225 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bindra, D., and Reichert, H., Psychopharmacologia, 10, 330 (1967).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bohdanecky, Z., and Jarvik, M., Arch. Intern. Pharmacodyn., 170, 58 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sachs, E., in Zubin, J., and Hunt, H. F., Comparative Psychopathology, 249 (Grune and Stratton, New York, 1967).

  15. Overton, D. A., in Efron, D. H., Cole, J. O., Levine, J., and Wittenborn, J. R., Psychopharmacology: A Review of Progress, 918 (US Government Printing Office, PHS Publication No. 1836, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DORR, M., STEINBERG, H., TOMKIEWICZ, M. et al. Persistence of Dose Related Behaviour in Mice. Nature 231, 121–123 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/231121a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/231121a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing