Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Model of Cygnus X-2

Abstract

OBSERVATIONS on the optical object associated with Cyg X-2 (ref. 1) have shown that the system is a spectroscopic binary (for example, ref. 2), with one component a G star3, but the nature of the other component is not obvious. Kraft and Demoulin3 identified the G component from weak but definitely present G-type features, including the λ4226 line of Ca I, which they measured for radial velocities. By assuming an absolute visual magnitude of + 5.5 for the G star, they estimated the distance of Cyg X-2 to be 500 to 700 pc. This in turn, together with the X-ray flux observations, means that the X-ray luminosity is about 25 L. As well as the G spectrum, broad Balmer absorption lines, of equivalent width appropriate for about type A8, and relatively sharp absorption lines of Ca II (H and K) are prominent. The profiles of the Balmer lines are unique4 in that they are very broad, yet show no wings of any kind. The widths are far too great to result from thermal Doppler motions, for hydrogen could not be neutral at the indicated temperature. Sofia5 has shown that all broadening mechanisms except mass motions (of the order of 103 km s−1) can be eliminated. A further unusual feature is the ratio of the strengths of the Balmer lines, with the high number lines relatively strong, Hβ quite weak, and Hα entirely absent or perhaps present weakly in emission2. Beyond the fact that they show binary motion, the most noteworthy feature of the radial velocity measures is their very large scatter and lack of repeatability. Although the radial velocities were determined in difficult conditions, so that the errors of measurement are much greater than normally expected, the scatter in the Balmer line velocities is far too large to be explained in this way. Within these uncertainties, however, we can say that there seem to be two velocity systems represented: that of Ca I and He II, and that of Ca II and the Balmer lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giacconi, R., Gorenstein, P., Gursky, H., Usher, P. D., Waters, J. R., Sandage, A., Osmer, P., and Peach, J. V., Astrophys. J. Lett., 148, L129 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burbidge, E. M., Lynds, C. R., and Stockton, A. N., Astrophys. J. Lett., 150, L95 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kraft, R. P., and Demoulin, M. H., Astrophys. J. Lett., 150, L183 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kristian, J., Sandage, A., and Westphal, J. A., Astrophys. J. Lett., 150, L99 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sofia, S., Astrophys. Lett., 2, 173 (1968).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lynds, C. R., Astrophys. J. Lett., 149, L41 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peimbert, M., Spinrad, H., Taylor, B. J., and Johnson, H. M., Astrophys. J. Lett., 151, L93 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sklovsky, I. S., Astrophys. J. Lett., 148, L1 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sofia, S., Astrophys. J. Lett., 149, L59 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cameron, A. G. W., and Mock, M., Nature, 215, 464 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kopal, Z., Close Binary Systems, 516 (Wiley and Sons, New York, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WILSON, R., SOFIA, S. Model of Cygnus X-2. Nature 223, 1350–1351 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/2231350a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2231350a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing