Abstract
THE increasing complexity of bacterial genetics is illustrated by several recent letters in Nature1. What seems to us a rather chaotic growth in technical vocabulary has followed these experimental developments. This may result not infrequently in prolix and cavil publications, and important investigations may thus become unintelligible to the non-specialist. For example, the terms bacterial ‘transformation’, ‘induction’ and ‘transduction’ have all been used for describing aspects of a single phenomenon, namely, ‘sexual recombination’ in bacteria2. (Even the word ‘infection’ has found its way into reviews on this subject.) As a solution to this confusing situation, we would like to suggest the use of the term ‘inter-bacterial information’ to replace those above. It does not imply necessarily the transfer of material substances, and recognizes the possible future importance of cybernetics at the bacterial level.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Lederberg, J., and Tatum, E. L., Nature, 158, 558 (1946). Cavalli, L. L., and Heslot, H., Nature, 164, 1058 (1949). Hayes, W., Nature, 169, 118 (1952).
Lindegren, C. C., Zlb. Bakt., Abt. II, 92, 40 (1935).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
EPHRUSSI, B., LEOPOLD, U., WATSON, J. et al. Terminology in Bacterial Genetics. Nature 171, 701 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1038/171701a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/171701a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.