Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Body composition analysis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in female diabetics differ between manufacturers

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of body composition results by two dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) instruments, namely QDR-2000 from Hologic Inc and DPX from Lunar in subpopulations of lean and obese subjects. Design: Cross-sectional study with 85 female diabetics (BMI 18–43 kg/m2) measured with both DXA instruments. Results: The regression lines for fat tissue mass (FTM), FAT% and total body bone mineral content (TBMC), but not lean tissue mass (LTM), were different from the line of identity (P<0.01). However, the relationships were high (r2>0.95), and the corresponding SEE%’s were low (0.8–4.8%), and were independent of BMI. FTM and FAT% measured by the QDR-2000 were 10% higher, and LTM and TBMC 6% lower, than by DPX (P<0.001). Conclusions: There were lack of agreements between total body composition results by DPX Lunar, and QDR-2000 Hologic Inc. Individual results on the two systems cannot be directly compared. Standardization of body composition measurements by DXA is strongly needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kistorp, C., Svendsen, O. Body composition analysis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in female diabetics differ between manufacturers. Eur J Clin Nutr 51, 449–454 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600424

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600424

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links