Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Diagnosis

Cancer diagnosis in UK primary care

Patients with cancer in the UK often have multiple consultations with their family doctor before diagnosis, which is partly due to different symptoms each cancer type presents. Tumours with one main symptom and a simple investigative pathway are easier to diagnose, but structural investigational barriers also contribute to delayed diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Richards, M. A. The size of the prize for earlier diagnosis of cancer in England. Br. J. Cancer 101 (Suppl. 2), S125–S129 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vedsted, P. & Olesen, F. Are the serious problems in cancer survival partly rooted in gatekeeper principles? An ecologic study. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 61, e508–e512 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lyratzopoulos, G., Neal, R. D., Barbiere, J. M., Rubin, G. P. & Abel, G. A. Variation in number of general practitioner consultations before hospital referral for cancer: findings from the 2010 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England. Lancet Oncol. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70041-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Potter, S. et al. Referral patterns, cancer diagnoses, and waiting times after introduction of two week wait rule for breast cancer: prospective cohort study. BMJ 335, 288–291 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamilton, W. & Peters, T. J. (Eds) Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (Churchill Livingstone, Oxford, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hamilton, W. The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients. Br. J. Cancer 3, S80–S86 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamilton, W., Round, A., Sharp, D. & Peters, T. J. Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case-control study. Br. J. Cancer 93, 399–405 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stapley, S., Peters, T. J., Sharp, D. & Hamilton, W. The mortality of colorectal cancer in relation to the initial symptom at presentation to primary care and to the duration of symptoms: a cohort study using medical records. Br. J. Cancer 95, 1321–1325 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

W. Hamilton declares that he holds research grants on cancer diagnostics from the UK Department of Health, where he is also an unpaid member of some committees tasked with provision of cancer diagnostic services in England. He is also the unpaid clinical leader on the current revision of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on cancer diagnosis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamilton, W. Cancer diagnosis in UK primary care. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 9, 251–252 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.63

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.63

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer