Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Telemedicine collaboration improves perinatal regionalization and lowers statewide infant mortality

Journal of Perinatology volume 33, pages 725–730 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

We assessed a telemedicine (TM) network’s effects on decreasing deliveries of very low birth weight (VLBW, <1500 g) neonates in hospitals without Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) and statewide infant mortality.

Study design:

This prospective study used obstetrical and neonatal interventions through TM consults, education and census rounds with 9 hospitals from 1 July 2009 to 31 March 2010. Using a generalized linear model, Medicaid data compared VLBW birth sites, mortality and morbidity before and after TM use. Arkansas Health Department data and χ2 analysis were used to compare infant mortality.

Result:

Deliveries of VLBW neonates in targeted hospitals decreased from 13.1 to 7.0% (P=0.0099); deliveries of VLBW neonates in remaining hospitals were unchanged. Mortality decreased in targeted hospitals (13.0% before TM and 6.7% after TM). Statewide infant mortality decreased from 8.5 to 7.0 per 1000 deliveries (P=0.043).

Conclusion:

TM decreased deliveries of VLBW neonates in hospitals without NICUs and was associated with decreased statewide infant mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fanaroff AA, Stoll BJ, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, Stark AR et al. Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birthweight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196 (2): 147.e141–e148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Warner B, Musial MJ, Chenier T, Donovan E . The effect of birth hospital type on the outcome of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2004; 113 (1 Pt 1): 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission of infants with Very Low Birth Weight-19 States, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010; 59 (44): 1444–1447.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lasswell SM, Barfield WD, Rochat RW, Blackmon L . Perinatal regionalization for very low-birth-weight and very preterm infants: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2010; 304 (9): 992–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Phibbs CS, Bronstein JM, Buxton E, Phibbs RH . The effects of patient volume and level of care at the hospital of birth on neonatal mortality. JAMA 1996; 276 (13): 1054–1059.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Phibbs CS, Baker LC, Caughey AB, Danielsen B, Schmitt SK, Phibbs RH . Level and volume of neonatal intensive care and mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2007; 356 (21): 2165–2175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lorch SA, Baiocchi M, Ahlberg CE, Small DS . The Differential impact of delivery hospital on the outcomes of premature infants. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (2): 270–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryan GM Jr. . Toward improving the outcome of pregnancy Recommendations for the regional development of perinatal health services. Obstet Gynecol 1975; 46 (4): 375–384.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Little GA, Merenstein GB . Toward improving the outcome of pregnancy, 1993: perinatal regionalization revisited. Pediatrics 1993; 92 (4): 611–612.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. American Academy of, Pediatrics. ACOG (eds). Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 6th ed 2007.

  11. Lowery C, Bronstein J, McGhee J, Ott R, Reece EA, Mays GP . ANGELS and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences paradigm for distant obstetrical care delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196 (6): 534 e531-539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hall-Barrow J, Hall RW, Burke BL Jr. . Telemedicine and neonatal regionalization of care—ensuring that the right baby gets to the right nursery. Pediatric Annals 2009; 38 (10): 557–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blackmon L, Barfield W, Stark A . Hospital neonatal services in the United States: variation in definitions, criteria, and regulatory status, 2008. J Perinatol 2009; 29: 788–794.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. US Department of Health and Human, Services. Healthy People 2010: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives 2 edn Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: Rockville, MD, USA, 2010.

  15. March of, Dimes. Toward improving the outcome of pregnancy: enhancing perinatal health through quality, safety, and performance initiatives 2011.

  16. Scott KE, Kim DY, Wang L, Kane SA, Coki O, Starren J et al. Telemedical diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity intraphysician agreement between ophthalmoscopic examination and image-based interpretation. Ophthalmology 2008; 115 (7): 1222–1228 e1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams SL, Wang L, Kane SA, Lee TC, Weissgold DJ, Berrocal AM et al. Telemedical diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity: accuracy of expert versus non-expert graders. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94 (3): 351–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rendina MC . The effect of telemedicine on neonatal intensive care unit length of stay in very low birthweight infants. Proceedings/AMIA 1998 Annual Symposium. 111–115.

  19. Lindberg B, Axelsson K, Ohrling K . Experience with videoconferencing between a neonatal unit and the families' home from the perspective of certified paediatric nurses. J Telemed Telecare 2009; 15 (6): 275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Britt DW, Norton JD, Hubanks AS, Navidad SA, Perkins RJ, Lowery CL . A two-period assessment of changes in specialist contact in a high-risk pregnancy telemedical program. Telemed J E Health 2006; 12 (1): 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gonzalez-Espada WJ, Hall-Barrow J, Hall RW, Burke BL, Smith CE . Achieving success connecting academic and practicing clinicians through telemedicine. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (3): e476–e483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bronstein JM, Lomatsch CT, Fletcher D, Wooten T, Lin TM, Nugent R et al. Issues and biases in matching medicaid pregnancy episodes to vital records data: the Arkansas experience. Matern Child Health J 2009; 13 (2): 250–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tilford JM, Simpson PM, Green JW, Lensing S, Fiser DH . Volume-outcome relationships in pediatric intensive care units. Pediatrics 2000; 106 (2 Pt 1): 289–294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Synnes AR, Macnab YC, Qiu Z, Ohlsson A, Gustafson P, Dean CB et al. Neonatal intensive care unit characteristics affect the incidence of severe intraventricular hemorrhage. Med Care 2006; 44 (8): 754–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bartels DB, Wypij D, Wenzlaff P, Dammann O, Poets CF . Hospital volume and neonatal mortality among very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2006; 117 (6): 2206–2214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lemons JA, Bauer CR, Oh W, Korones SB, Papile LA, Stoll BJ et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child health and human development neonatal research network, January 1995 through December 1996. NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2001; 107 (1): E1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gleissner M, Jorch G, Avenarius S . Risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in a birth cohort of 3721 premature infants. J Perinat Med. 2000; 28 (2): 104–110.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohamed MA, Aly H . Transport of premature infants is associated with increased risk for intraventricular haemorrhage. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95 (6): F403–F407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Palmer KG, Kronsberg SS, Barton BA, Hobbs CA, Hall RW, Anand KJS . Effect of inborn versus outborn delivery on clinical outcomes in ventilated preterm neonates: secondary results from the NEOPAIN trial. J Perinatol 2005; 25 (4): 270–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bode MM, O'Shea TM, Metzguer KR, Stiles AD . Perinatal regionalization and neonatal mortality in North Carolina, 1968-1994. Am J Obstet Gyneco 2001; 184 (6): 1302–1307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dooley SL, Freels SA, Turnock BJ . Quality assessment of perinatal regionalization by multivariate analysis: Illinois, 1991-1993. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89 (2): 193–198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hein HA . Regionalization of perinatal health care: a lesson learned but lost. J Perinatol 1999; 19 (8 Pt 1): 584–588.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rautava L, Lehtonen L, Peltola M, Korvenranta E, Korvenranta H, Linna M et al. The effect of birth in secondary- or tertiary-level hospitals in Finland on mortality in very preterm infants: a birth-register study. Pediatrics 2007; 119 (1): e257–e263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bronstein JM, Capilouto E, Carlo WA, Haywood JL, Goldenberg RL . Access to neonatal intensive care for low-birthweight infants: the role of maternal characteristics. Am J Public Health 1995; 85 (3): 357–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dobrez D, Gerber S, Budetti P . Trends in perinatal regionalization and the role of managed care. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108 (4): 839–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Alverson D, Swinfen L, Swinfen L, Rheuban K, Sable C, Smith A et al. Transforming systems of care for children in the global community. Pediatric Annals 2009; 38 (10): 579–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rheuban KS . The role of telemedicine in fostering health-care innovations to address problems of access, specialty shortages and changing patient care needs. J Telemed Telecare 2006; 12 (Suppl 2): S45–S50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Armfield NR, Donovan T, Smith AC . Clinicians' perceptions of telemedicine for remote neonatal consultation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 161: 1–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith AC, Bensink M, Armfield N, Stillman J, Caffery L . Telemedicine and rural health care applications. J Postgrad Med 2005; 51 (4): 286–293.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Marcin JP, Schepps DE, Page KA, Struve SN, Nagrampa E, Dimand RJ . The use of telemedicine to provide pediatric critical care consultations to pediatric trauma patients admitted to a remote trauma intensive care unit: a preliminary report. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2004; 5 (3): 251–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Marcin JP, Ellis J, Mawis R, Nagrampa E, Nesbitt TS, Dimand RJ . Using telemedicine to provide pediatric subspecialty care to children with special health care needs in an underserved rural community.[see comment]. Pediatrics 2004; 113 (1 Pt 1): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the contributions of Arkansas Medicaid as a source of data in this publication, the Arkansas Department of Health, especially John Senner PhD and Shalini Manjanatha, and to P20 GM103425 (RWH). We also acknowledge Dr Janet Bronstein for her work on this project. We also thank the members of our research committee: Dr Curtis Lowery, David Fletcher, Tina Benton, Julie Hall-Barrow, Shannon Lewis, Stacy Pitsch, Lori Heil and Sarah Rhoads. We would like to recognize the obstetric and neonatal physicians, nurses and support staff of the participating hospitals, whose dedication made this program possible. This study was supported by a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service Transformation Grant (contract 4600016735), P20 GM103425 (RWH) and ANGELS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USA

    E W Kim & R W Hall

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Distance Health, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA

    T J Teague-Ross, W W Greenfield & D Kuo

  3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA

    D Keith Williams

Authors
  1. E W Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T J Teague-Ross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W W Greenfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D Keith Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D Kuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R W Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E W Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, E., Teague-Ross, T., Greenfield, W. et al. Telemedicine collaboration improves perinatal regionalization and lowers statewide infant mortality. J Perinatol 33, 725–730 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.37

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.37

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links