Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Validity of four indirect methods to measure adherence in primary care hypertensives

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 21, pages 579–584 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

High blood pressure (HBP) is one of the most important risk factors for morbidity and mortality in the world. Non-adherence to medication is associated with the lack of control of HBP. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of four indirect methods for measuring adherence to medication to control HBP in primary health care. A random sample of 120 hypertensive patients who were undergoing treatment for at least 2 months in a primary care unit in Florianópolis (Brazil) were included in the study. The independent variables were four indirect methods to measure adherence to medication: knowledge regarding the HBP medication, the blood pressure level, attitude regarding the medication intake (Morisky–Green test) and self-reported adherence. The classification of HBP was based on criteria established by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. The gold standard used for measuring adherence was the pill count. Logistic regression was used to estimate sensitivity (highest value of 88.2% for self-report), specificity (highest value of 70.7% for HBP control), positive predictive value (highest value of 46.4% for HBP control) and negative predictive value (highest value of 79.1% for Morisky–Green test) for each of the indirect methods. No indirect method of measuring adherence had a good positive predictive value for adherence, which was best predicted by patients' age and whether they managed to control HBP. The results also revealed low treatment adherence (31.2%) and low control of HBP (37.6%). Non-adherence was mainly associated with side effects of the treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO. Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2003.

  2. Pedoe HT . Hypertension. In: Miller DL, Farmer RDT (eds). Epidemiology of Diseases. Blackwell Scientific Publications: London, 1982, pp 122–135.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Braam RL, van Uum SH, Russel FG, Swinkels DW, Thien T . Bromide as a marker to measure adherence to drug therapy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2006; 62: 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton GA . Measuring adherence in a hypertension clinical trial. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2003; 2: 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Krousel-Wood M, Muntner P, Jannu A, Desalvo K, Re RN . Reliability of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. Am J Med Sci 2005; 330: 128–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Milchak JL, Carter BL, Ardery G, Black HR, Bakris GL, Jones DW et al. Development of explicit criteria to measure adherence to hypertension guidelines. J Hum Hypertens 2006; 20: 426–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Strelec MAAM, Pierin AMG, Mion Jr D . The influence of patient's consciousness regarding high blood pressure and patient's attitude in face of disease controlling medicine intake. Arq Bras Cardiol 2003; 81: 349–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Gibson ES . Randomized clinical trial of strategies for improving medication compliance in primary hypertension. Lancet 1975; 1: 1205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Morisky DE, Green LW, Levine DM . Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care 1986; 24: 67–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gomes MAM, Nobre F, Amodeo C, Kohlmann Jr O, Praxedes JN, Machado CA et al. IV Brazilian Guidelines on Hypertension. Arq Bras Cardiol 2004; 82 (Suppl 4): 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, CCS/UFSC, Campus Universitário, Trindade, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil,

    J C Prado Jr

  2. Department of Public Health – CCS/UFSC, Federal University at Santa Catarina, Campus Universitário, Trindade, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil,

    E Kupek

  3. Hypertension Unit, Clinic Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    D Mion Jr

  4. Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    D Mion Jr

  5. Municipal Secretary of Health, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil

    J C Prado Jr

Authors
  1. J C Prado Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E Kupek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D Mion Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J C Prado Jr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prado, J., Kupek, E. & Mion, D. Validity of four indirect methods to measure adherence in primary care hypertensives. J Hum Hypertens 21, 579–584 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1002196

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1002196

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links