Propionibacterium freudenreichii, a dairy starter, can reach a population of almost 109 propionibacteria per gram in Swiss-type cheese at the time of consumption. Also consumed as a probiotic, it displays strain-dependent anti-inflammatory properties mediated by surface proteins that induce IL-10 in leukocytes. We selected 23 strains with varied anti-inflammatory potentials in order to identify the protein(s) involved. After comparative genomic analysis, 12 of these strains were further analysed by surface proteomics, eight of them being further submitted to transcriptomics. The omics data were then correlated to the anti-inflammatory potential evaluated by IL-10 induction. This comparative omics strategy highlighted candidate genes that were further subjected to gene-inactivation validation. This validation confirmed the contribution of surface proteins, including SlpB and SlpE, two proteins with SLH domains known to mediate non-covalent anchorage to the cell-wall. Interestingly, HsdM3, predicted as cytoplasmic and involved in DNA modification, was shown to contribute to anti-inflammatory activity. Finally, we demonstrated that a single protein cannot explain the anti-inflammatory properties of a strain. These properties therefore result from different combinations of surface and cytoplasmic proteins, depending on the strain. Our enhanced understanding of the molecular bases for immunomodulation will enable the relevant screening for bacterial resources with anti-inflammatory properties.
Propionibacterium freudenreichii (Pf) is a food grade bacterium with GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status that belongs to the dairy propionibacteria class. It is most commonly used as a starter for the manufacture of fermented dairy products such Emmental and Leerdammer cheeses1, but it is also employed as a probiotic supplement2. During the past decade, growing interest in pathologies linked to dysbiosis, such as inflammatory bowel disease, has motivated research on the anti-inflammatory properties of beneficial bacteria, including probiotic bacteria as Pf. The remarkable anti-inflammatory properties of the Pf species were revealed, but the genetic basis for them still needs to be elucidated. The first genome of the type strain CIRM 1 was published in 20103. Since then, 22 genomes have been sequenced, annotated and made publicly available4,5,6. Interestingly, the Pf species is characterised by high intraspecific variability among strains regarding numerous physiological traits, including their immunomodulation properties; although the data on this latter trait have highlighted the remarkable anti-inflammatory properties of the species, their levels are strain-dependant7. In vitro, the probiotic JS strain of Pf was shown to inhibit the secretion of IL-8 from Helicobacter pylori-infected Caco-2 cells8. In a human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) model, this strain stimulated IL-10 production up to levels similar to those measured for the three bifidobacteria strains tested9. In human PBMCs, nine strains of Pf were shown to induce the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 with varying intensity, whereas no pro-inflammatory IL-12, TNF-α or IFN-γ cytokines were induced7. Within the same nine strains, SI48 was shown to protect mice from TNBS-induced colitis by modulating both colonic and systemic inflammatory markers. The Pf CIRM 129 strain (also known as ITG P20) was shown to induce IL-10 after growth on laboratory YEL culture medium and also on skimmed milk. Interestingly, when grown in combination with other lactic acid bacteria in fermented milk, this strain retained its anti-inflammatory properties and also reduced the pro-inflammatory IL-12 cytokines induced by lactic acid bacteria in the PBMC model10. The consumption by mice of an experimental cheese fermented with the same CIRM 129 strain alleviated the symptoms of TNBS-induced colitis11. In the same way, a milk whey culture of the Pf ET-3 strain administrated to rats with TNBS-colitis helped to accelerate the healing of colitis12. Finally, the consumption of milk fermented with the Pf CIRM 129 strain was shown to modulate cytokines in the colon of pigs13. The molecular mechanisms and genetic basis for the anti-inflammatory effects of Pf are still unclear. The involvement of chemical compounds secreted by Pf outside the cell has been suggested by different authors. In the study by Uchida & Mogami12, the healing of TNBS-induced colitis was also observed following the oral administration of propionate, the major metabolite released by Propionibacterium species. In mice with DSS-induced colitis, DHNA (1,4-Dihydroxy-2-naphthoic acid), which is a component of the menaquinone (vitamin K2) biosynthesis pathways produced by Pf, improved the survival rate and histological damage scores14. DHNA attenuates inflammation in interleukin-10-deficient mice with colitis by inhibiting the production of macrophage-derived pro-inflammatory cytokines15. The surface composition of Pf bacteria has been studied, sometimes in correlation with their immunomodulatory properties. Some strains are covered with a layer of β-glucan exopolysaccharides, whose synthesis is encoded by the gtfF gene16,17. In three Pf strains (CIRM1, lsp110 and lsp103), the gtfF gene was inactivated. This inactivation leads to a lack of β-glucan at the bacterial surface. Interestingly, the resulting mutants induce the release of cytokines, while the parental wild types do not, suggesting the availability of key surface components18. In three Pf strains (CIRM129, 118 and SI48), surface proteins have been shown to be involved in their anti-inflammatory properties. Three guanidine-treated strains lost their ability to induce IL-10, indicating that surface extractable proteins trigger the release of IL-10 immunomodulatory cytokine7,19. Identification of the proteins extracted by guanidine in CIRM129 revealed a mix of at least five proteins: SlpA, SlpB, SlpE, InlA and LspA19. The identity of the proteins responsible for the immune response is still unknown.
During the present study, we therefore hypothesised that the surface composition of Pf was linked to its immunomodulatory properties. To test this hypothesis, the surface proteome of Pf was characterized for 12 sequenced strains using three different, previously described methods19. We then investigated possible correlations between, on the one hand, the ability to induce IL-10 cytokine, and on the other, the presence of genes, the expression of mRNAs and detection in the surface proteome. For the first time, a multi-strain study combining comparative genomics, transcriptomics and surface proteomics, coupled with gene inactivation, led to the identification of key surface proteins responsible for the anti-inflammatory properties of Pf strains.
Anti-inflammatory properties of P. freudenreichii strains
Twenty-three strains of Pf were tested for their immunomodulatory properties, based on different cytokine induction patterns following the stimulation of human PBMCs, i.e. IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α and IFN-γ, and after growth in a dairy-based medium. A strain-dependent induction of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was observed (Fig. 1). Some strains, such as CIRM 129 and CIRM 122, induced a high level of IL-10 secretion in PBMCs, similar to that induced by the anti-inflammatory BB536 strain of Bifidobacterium longum, used as positive control. By contrast, some strains such as CIRM 121 induced very low IL-10 secretion in PBMCs. The secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-12, IFN-γ and TNF-α) by PBMCs was also analysed. As for B. longum BB536, Pf strains were seen to be very weak inducers of IFN-γ (except for CIRM 122 and CIRM 138) and did not induce IL-12. Pf CIRM 122 and Pf CIRM 138 induced IFN-γ secretion by PBMCs but to a lesser extent than that induced by MG1363, the weak anti-inflammatory strain of Lactococcus lactis. As for IL-10 secretion, Pf-induced TNF-α secretion was strain-dependent but the levels did not exceed those induced by the BB536 strain of B. longum. Collectively, these results tended to indicate an anti-inflammatory profile for all Pf strains, with varying levels of IL-10, weak levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α and no induction of IL-12.
Phylogenetic analysis of P. freudenreichii strains and the selection of strains for association analysis
The strains used for the phylogenetic analysis are shown in Supplementary Table S1 available online. The genome of CIRM 1, previously sequenced and annotated, is complete, whereas the other strains are in a draft state and deposited in several scaffolds in the EMBL database. In order to evaluate strain diversity, a phylogenetic tree was reconstructed, based on the concatenation of orthologous proteins in the core genome, i.e. proteins present in a single copy in all strains (1011 out of 4971 proteins) (Fig. 2). Twelve strains were preselected in pairs from this phylogenetic tree for additional proteomic studies. The strains were chosen in pairs so that: (i) members of a pair would be close by in the tree (genetically similar) but exhibit contrasted phenotypic properties, and (ii) the pairs would span the complete diversity of the phylogenetic tree, so as to mitigate the effect of the shared evolutionary history of strains (see Fig. 2). The 12 selected strains (boxed in Fig. 2) consisted of CIRM 1, 118, 121, 122, 129, 134, 138, 139, 456, 514, 516 and 527. Eight of them (shown in grey in Fig. 2, all previous strains excluding CIRM 1, 118, 138, 527) were also selected for transcriptomic studies: they included CIRM 129, 122 and 456 as strong anti-inflammatory strains, CIRM 516, 134 and 121 as weak anti-inflammatory strains and CIRM 514 and 139 as intermediate effect strains.
Surface proteome analysis of P. freudenreichii
An initial global analysis of the proteins located at the surface of the cells, using guanidine hydrochloride extraction, revealed considerable diversity in terms of surface-layer-associated proteins, within the P. freudenreichii species (Fig. 3A). Thus, the surface proteomes of the 12 aforementioned strains were further inventoried using three different methods and compared to that of CIRM 129, which had previously been analysed under the same conditions19. All methods combined, the number of unique proteins identified for each strain ranged from 21 (CIRM 121) to 59 (CIRM 134). For the 12 strains, a total of 509 proteins were identified, representing 174 different proteins (many proteins were identified in several strains). Within these proteins, 23 could not be linked to a cluster because they corresponded to parts of bacterial genomes with poor quality sequences (inherent to draft genomes). About 70% of the 174 unique proteins identified were predicted as being cytoplasmic by SurfG + software20 (Fig. 3B). It should be noted that the number and identity of the proteins thus found was strongly dependent on the method used. As seen in Fig. 3C, proteins identified using the CyDye surface labelling method were mostly predicted as being cytoplasmic, so this method does not appear to be relevant when studying the surface proteome. However, with the shaving method, most of the proteins identified were predicted as being surface-exposed or secreted by SurfG+, which is consistent with their putative localisation. Among the 174 unique proteins, four were identified using the three methods in one or more strains. Three of them were surface proteins containing an SLH domain: SlpA (detected in CIRM118), SlpE (detected in CIRM129) and SlpB (detected in CIRM 118, 122 and 129). The fourth was LspA, a protein with a predicted molecular weight of 115 kDa and a glucosaminidase domain, which was detected in CIRM 456, 516 and 139. Finally, among the 174 proteins identified, one, represented by PFCIRM129_08670, was common to all 12 strains. The sequence of this protein contains a peptide signal and its predicted function is a secreted cell-wall peptidase. 77 proteins were identified in only one of the 12 strains, and could represent the specific proteome of each strain. All the other proteins identified were strain-dependent and could potentially be responsible for the strain-dependency of the anti-inflammatory properties of Pf. These proteomic data are summarised in the supplemental data online, Table S4.
Identification by association analysis of candidate genes potentially involved in the anti-inflammatory properties of P. freudenreichii
Reconciling the three types of data enabled the construction of a Venn diagram (Fig. 4). 488 clusters correlated with the IL-10 phenotype (adjusted p value < 0.05), 158 of them positively, based on their presence in or absence from the genomes of different strains. Likewise, 830 clusters were identified as being associated with the anti-inflammatory IL-10 phenotype, (p value < 0.05), 161 of them positively, based on the normalised expression levels of mRNA from those clusters. Finally, 32 clusters were found to be associated with the anti-inflammatory IL-10 phenotype, 11 of them positively, based on their presence in or absence from the surface proteomes of strains. Two clusters were identified as being associated with the anti-inflammatory phenotype by 3 omics typing: the clusters represented by htrA4 (negative association) and slpE (positive association).
Selection of candidate genes
The fifteen genes displaying the strongest association with IL-10 induction (five from genomics, five from transcriptomics, five from surface proteomics) were retained to validate their potential anti-inflammatory properties (see Table 1). The groL2 gene, the fifth candidate under the proteomics approach, was associated with proteomic analysis (R2 = 0.20, adjusted p = 0.01) and with transcriptomic analysis (R2 = 0.05, not in the top five with this method) but was eliminated from the selection as it was ambiguous; being positively associated with transcriptomics and negatively with proteomics. As well as the previous 14 genes, two genes were added to the selection based on prior results: slpB, and htrA4. The slpB gene was positively associated in proteomics and transcriptomics, and the SlpB protein had been suspected of being anti-inflammatory in a previous work19. The htrA4 gene was retained because it was associated with all three methods (adjusted p < 0.05), even though it was not in the top five with any of the methods. Within the 16 selected clusters, the representative genes slpB (PFCIRM129_00700), slpE (PFCIRM129_05460), slpF (PFCIRM129_01545) and slpC1 (PFCIRM121_08040) encode cell wall proteins that are predicted as surface exposed proteins. All these proteins contain Pfam SLH domains (Surface Layer Homology domain) and were confirmed as being surface exposed by proteomic analysis. The hsdM3 (PFCIRM129_00525), merA (PFCIRM129_03920) and lacI1 (PFCIM129_07765) genes encode predicted cytoplasmic proteins, involved in DNA restriction and modification, coenzyme metabolism and the transcription of regulation, respectively. The eno1 gene (PFCIRM121_10305) encodes a glycolytic enzyme, whereas acn encodes an enzyme of the TCA cycle responsible for the interconversion of citrate and isocitrate. The dcuA gene encodes a transport protein that is involved in C4-dicarboxylate transport, probably in the context of aspartate import. Finally, the pep gene encodes a peptidase. Four clusters were represented by genes encoding proteins of unknown function (Pouf): pouf 10785, pouf 10930, pouf 04790 and pouf 08235. No homologies or protein domains for these genes were found in the databases.
Inactivation of the selected candidate genes
In order to evaluate the role of the candidate genes in the anti-inflammatory properties of Pf, we pursued several strategies. When the regression coefficient was positive, inactivation of the candidate genes was attempted in Pf CIRM 129, the most anti-inflammatory strain. When the regression coefficient was negative, inactivation was attempted in Pf CIRM 121, the least anti-inflammatory strain. Despite numerous trials, we did not succeed in inactivating the following candidate genes: merA, lacI1, pouf 10785, pouf 10930 and pouf 04790 in Pf CIRM 129, and acn, slpC1 and dcuA in Pf CIRM 121. For some of these genes, we cannot exclude that their inactivation was lethal, thus making it impossible to obtain a mutant. Furthermore, in Pf CIRM 121, our experiments led us to conclude that the process of homologous recombination, that should have been specific, was not so in some cases. As a consequence, we observed a non-specific and random recombination of the pUC vector in the chromosomic DNA of the strain. Finally, the slpB (PFCIRM129_00700), slpE (PFCIRM129_05460), slpF (PFCIRM129_01545), hsdM3 (PFCIRM129_00525) and pep (PFCIRM129_10925) genes were successfully inactivated in Pf CIRM129, while the htrA4 (PFCIRM121_07195), eno1 (PFCIRM121_10305) and pouf 08235 (PFCIRM121_08235) genes were successfully inactivated in Pf CIRM 121 (Fig. 5).
In vitro validation of mutants on human PBMCs
The different mutant strains were tested for their immuno-modulatory properties on PBMCs and were compared to the corresponding wild type strains (Fig. 6). In Pf CIRM 129, the inactivation of slpB, slpE and hsdM3 led to a marked reduction in the secretion by PBMCs of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, whereas the inactivation of slpF and pouf 10925 produced no significant effect. This result demonstrated that slpB, slpE and hsdM3 are involved in the anti-inflammatory properties of the CIRM 129 strain. Secretion of the dual (pro- and anti-inflammatory) IL-6 and pro-inflammatory TNF-α and IFN-γ, cytokines was also analysed. A decreased secretion of IL-6 was measured with slpB, slpE, hsdM3 and slpF mutant strains compared to the WT strain. The inactivation of slpB, slpF and pouf 10925 led to the reduced secretion of both TNF-α and IFN-γ, whereas the inactivation of slpE only decreased the secretion of TNF-α. The inactivation of hsdM3 had no effect on the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Overall, these results demonstrated: i) the involvement of SlpB and SlpE in the secretion by PBMCs of both anti- and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the strain Pf CIRM 129, ii) the involvement of HsdM3 in the secretion of anti- inflammatory cytokines, and iii) the involvement of SlpF and Pep in the Pf CIRM 129-induced secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
In Pf CIRM 121, mutations of eno1, htrA4 and pouf 08235 tended to increase, or significantly increased, the secretion of anti- and pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, TNF-α and IL-6). Nevertheless, these mutations did not impact the secretion levels of IFN-γ, which are very low or non-existent with Pf CIRM 121. Collectively, these results showed the involvement of eno1, htrA4 and pouf 08235 in the weak secretion by PBMCs of Pf CIRM 121-induced pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines.
Dietary components with immunomodulatory properties, including bacteria, have recently attracted considerable attention. In particular, probiotic bacteria with anti-inflammatory capabilities offer new perspectives in the context of a rising incidence of pathologies linked with dysbiosis21. The latter involves an imbalance of the gut microbiota, involving the expansion of pro-inflammatory bacteria at the expense of their anti-inflammatory counterparts22. Diet modulates the structure, diversity and metabolism of the gut microbiota23,24, suggesting that these diseases could be alleviated by dietary intervention. In this context, numerous studies have addressed the immunological status of bacteria ingested via food or as a probiotic supplement. The underlying motivation is that manipulating the gut microbiota via food-borne bacteria offers a promising approach to preventing and/or treating pathologies linked with dysbiosis. Dairy propionibacteria form a rich group of bacterial species, with diverse beneficial, technological and health properties, such as vitamin B12 synthesis, the biosynthesis of bifidogenic compound such as DHNA, or the synthesis of aroma compounds in cheese1. A specific feature of the P. freudenreichii species is the overall anti-inflammatory properties of its strains, although to varying degrees, which have been observed both in vitro7 and in vivo in humans and animal models10,11,25. During the present work, we confirmed the strain-dependent anti-inflammatory effect of Pf when grown on a dairy medium, and we evidenced a variable strain-dependent surface proteome. We postulate that the correlation between these two variabilities (proteome and immunomodulation) may lead to identification of the protein(s) involved. In order to decipher the molecular components associated with anti-inflammatory strains of the Pf species, we implemented a strategy that combined three levels of analysis: genomics, transcriptomics and surface proteomics. Such a strategy has never previously been described in the literature, many studies having focused on the role of specific surface components in these anti-inflammatory effects. As an example, several lactobacillus species are able to produce S-layers, a crystalline array constituted of self-assembling S-layer proteins subunits26. These proteins are often identified as immunomodulatory components. Indeed, purified SlpA of L. acidophilus NCFM was demonstrated as being responsible for the anti-inflammatory cytokine induction profile of the strain, because the protein induced higher levels of IL-10 in the presence of LPS27. In the same way, S-layer protein A of L. helveticus MIMLh5 was demonstrated to exert pro-inflammatory effects on immune cells28. Therefore, not all the S-layer proteins of lactobacilli are anti-inflammatory. For example, in L. helveticus NS8, the S-layer protein was not found to exert any anti-inflammatory properties after extraction29. Other studies identified different cell wall components as being mediators of the anti-inflammatory properties of bacterial strains, such as the peptidoglycan in Lactobacillus salivarius Ls3330, or teichoic acids in Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB882631.
A few Pf strains are covered by an abundant proteinaceous paracrystalline surface layer (S-layer), while others are not32. Moreover, the surface of Pf strains may also be covered with different proteins not organized as an S-layer. In a previous work, we identified five surface proteins as potentially being implicated in the strong anti-inflammatory properties of the Pf CIRM 129 strain19. These surface proteins, extracted by guanidium hydrochloride and identified by mass spectrometry analysis, were InlA, LspA, SlpE, SlpA and SlpB. In the present work, using mutant strains inactivated in the slpB and slpE genes, we confirmed unambiguously the key role of SlpB and SlpE in these anti-inflammatory properties. The InlA, LspA and SlpA proteins are probably not implicated, as they were not highlighted by our multi-approach analysis. SlpF, another surface protein containing an SLH domain, was pointed out by our strategy. However, its anti-inflammatory role was not confirmed by the gene-inactivation experiments in strain CIRM 129, so this is not implicated for this strain. We cannot however exclude that this protein might have an effect in another strain. As mentioned before for different lactic acid bacteria species, some surface components of Pf have been demonstrated to mediate the anti-inflammatory properties of the species. However, unsuspectingly, our strategy led to the identification of a cytoplasmic protein with an anti-inflammatory effect: HsdM3. This protein, involved in the DNA repair system, has never previously been identified as being anti-inflammatory, and further investigations are now necessary to clarify its role. Proteins predicted as having a cytoplasmic localisation and function have already been described as moonlighting, i.e. having a secondary surface localisation and effects on host immune responses (adhesion or immunomodulation)33.
Furthermore, and although SlpB and SlpE have been shown unambiguously to play a key role in the anti-inflammatory properties of Pf, they are not the exclusive drivers. Indeed, the slpB gene was present in the two most anti-inflammatory strains CIRM 129 and CIRM 122 and the corresponding protein was detected at the surface of these strains by proteomic analysis. However, slpB was missing from strains CIRM 119 and 456, which also exhibit strong anti-inflammatory properties (Fig. 5). Moreover, the SlpB protein was detected at the surface of the CIRM 118 strain, even though that strain is weakly anti-inflammatory (Fig. 5). The slpE gene was present in all the strains except for CIRM 125 and 513 and the two non-anti-inflammatory strains 516 and 121 (see Fig. 5). However, the SlpE protein was only detected in the surface proteome of CIRM 129 and not in the proteome of other strongly inflammatory strains. Because the transcriptomic data revealed a high level of slpE transcription in CIRM 129 (by comparison with other strains possessing the gene), strain-specific transcriptional regulation seems to explain the presence of the anti-inflammatory SlpE protein at the surface of Pf. Taken together, our results strongly suggest that the anti-inflammatory phenotype is due to a combination of different proteins that are mainly surface exposed. During this work, we identified the main actors explaining this phenotype. Thus, as has been demonstrated for lactobacilli and bifidobacteria26,34, the immunomodulatory response is the result of the detection by immunocompetent cells of a mosaic of surface proteins and other components (pro-and anti-inflammatory proteins). All these components contribute to the net balance of immunomodulatory properties of Pf strains. Finally, the presence of certain proteins identified as being negatively correlated must be taken into account as possibly playing a role in the global architecture of the cell wall, as was observed previously for the β-glucan polysaccharide produced by several strains of Pf18.
Overall, these results showed that different molecular mechanisms and/or components are at play in this context. There is not a single component in Pf that is responsible for the anti-inflammatory properties of all strains, but these anti-inflammatory properties result from a combination of not only surface components but also probably cytoplasmic actors. The relative contribution of each component differs from one strain to another and is still difficult to evaluate. In our study, we identified some drivers of anti-inflammatory properties of Pf, including surface proteins SlpB and SlpE. The validation of many of the other candidate genes highlighted by our multi-omics approach was however limited by the difficulties encountered in transforming and inactivating genes in Pf. The same difficulties prevented us from obtaining double mutant strains, a prerequisite for the biological validation of interactions between different components. Finally, our study demonstrated the natural biodiversity within the Pf species regarding its immunomodulatory properties. In terms of the development of probiotics, a promising option may be to screen all Pf strains and ensure careful association of strains with the different and complementary genes responsible for anti-inflammatory properties. This could lead to the development of new probiotic products for use in target populations with dysbiosis.
Materials and Methods
Bacteria and growth medium
The Pf strains and their genetically modified derivatives are listed in supplementary Table S1 online. The wild-type (WT) strains were provided by the CIRM-BIA Biological Resource Center (Centre International de Ressources Microbiennes-Bactéries d’Intérêt Alimentaire, INRA, Rennes, France). They were stored at −80 °C in YEL medium35. Before use, they were subcultured from frozen stock two times using a 2% inoculum either on YEL medium or on skim cow milk ultrafiltrat supplemented with 50 mM of sodium L-lactate (galaflow SL60, Société Arnaud, Paris, France) and 5 g/L of casein hydrolysate (Organotechnie, La Courneuve, France)36. The growth was performed at 30 °C without shaking. In some cases specified in the text, YEL was supplemented with chloramphenicol (10 μg/ml-1) or hygromycin B (750 μg/ml-1 in YEL agar or 250 μg/ml-1 in liquid YEL). The following bacterial strains of other species were used as positive controls for immune cell stimulation: Lactococcus lactis MG136337 and Bifidobacterium longum BB53638. They were prepared as previously described37.
In vitro immunomodulatory properties (PBMC)
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from peripheral blood of at least four healthy french donors as previously described37. Briefly, after a Ficoll gradient centrifugation (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden), mononuclear cells were collected, washed in RPMI 1640 medium (Live technologies, Paisley, Scotland) and adjusted to 2 × 106 cells/mL in RPMI 1640 supplemented with gentamicin (150 μg.mL) and 10% Fetal Calf Serum (Gibco-BRL). PBMCs (2 × 106 cells/mL) were seeded in 48-well tissue culture plates (Corning, N.Y. US). Then, ten microliters of thawed bacterial suspensions of microorganisms to be tested and the positive control strains were added. The later were prepared as followed. Stationary-phase grown microbes were used, in order to be better aligned with the conditions encountered in fermented dairy foods. The microbes were washed twice in PBS, resuspended in PBS containing 20% glycerol using a portable photometer (Densimat, BioMérieux, Craponne, France) to adjust cell density to McFarland 3 and stored at −80 °C until further use39. These standardized bacterial preparations in terms of cell biomass, correspond to approximately 1–2 × 109 CFU/mL, for Pf strains. This resulted in a bacteria-to-immune cell ratio of approximately 10:1. PBS containing 20% glycerol was used as a negative (non-stimulated) control. On the basis of preliminary time-course studies, 24 h stimulation corresponded to the best time point for cytokine responses of the PBMCs. After 24 h stimulation at 37 °C in an atmosphere of air with 5% CO2, culture supernatants were collected and we verified that most of the bacteria were alive by plating on YEL agar medium. The culture supernatants were clarified by centrifugation and stored at −20 °C until cytokine analysis. Neither medium acidification nor bacterial proliferation was observed. Cytokines were measured by ELISA using BD Pharmingen antibody pairs (BD Biosciences, San Jose, Ca, USA) for IL-10, IL-12 and IFN-γ and R&D systems Kit for IL-6 and TNF-α according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Data were expressed as means +/− SEM, either in pg.mL−1 for cytokines, in relative proportion of the WT strain in the case of mutants, and in relative values for IL-10/IL-12 ratio.
Results are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Non- parametric Mann–Whitney tests were used to calculate significance levels for measurements. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Clustering of orthologous proteins based on whole genomes sequences
The whole genome sequencing, assembly and annotation of the 21 strains of Pf were conducted as previously described6. To establish the correspondence between the gene repertoires of the 21 Pf strains, we used single-linkage clustering whereby two predicted coding sequences were considered as belonging to the same gene cluster when blastp revealed a local alignment with at least 80% identity and accounting for at least 88% of the protein length (and E-value < 0.001). These thresholds were selected to maximize the number of clusters with exactly one representative per genome, i.e. single copy genes in the core genome. This approach led to the identification of 4971 clusters and the content of each genome was summarized as a presence/absence profile (across the 21 strains) of the 4971 genes (clusters). Based on contrasted IL-10 cytokine induction levels despite a high phylogenetic proximity, 8 out the 21 strains were selected for further transcriptomics analysis (CIRM 121, 122, 129, 134, 139, 456, 514, and 516) and 12 for proteomics analysis (adding CIRM 1, 118, 138 and 527). This choice minimized the confounding effect of phylogenetic inertia, i.e. the chance that a cluster is associated with high IL-10 induction levels simply because of shared evolutionary history of the 21 strains40.
A phylogenetic tree was reconstructed based on the concatenation of orthologous proteins of the core genome, i.e. proteins present in single copy in all strains. The phylogeny was reconstructed using PhyML (version 3) with the JTT + I + G model, selected by ProtTest. The inferred tree had high bootstrap values (>80) for all major clades with only 4 low values (<60), for shallow nodes. The topology was rooted at the midpoint of the longest distance between two strains in the 21-strain tree (midpoint rooting).
The 8 aforementioned strains were grown on skim cow milk ultrafiltrat supplemented with sodium L-lactate and casein hydrolysate for 72 h, at 30 °C. The RNA extraction was performed as previously described41 using Rneasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and a subsequent DNase treatment (Dnase Rnase free, Ambion) according to the supplier. RNA concentrations were quantified using a Nanodrop. RNA quality (RIN) was evaluated using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). RNA labeling and hybridization were performed by the ‘Biopuces GeT plateforme’ (INSA Toulouse, France). All of the RNA samples had a RIN value greater than 8.3, indicating a good RNA integrity. The ratios 260/230 and 260/280 were greater than 1, 8.
A pangenomic 4 × 72 K Nimblegen microarray (Roche Diagnostics, France) was designed. For this purpose, we used the Oligowiz software42 and a reference pangenome composed of a representative sequence for each gene cluster to build a repertoire of possible isothermal probes of length between 45 nt and 65 nt. A relatively high target melting temperature 90 °C (+/−5 °C) was selected to account for the high G + C-content of Pf (67%). Then, we proceeded to the probe selection according to two criteria. First, we required at least 45 nt between the 5′-ends of two adjacent probes on the reference sequence (implying the overlap to be less than 20 nt). Second, we preferred probes corresponding to genomic regions without SNPs and discarded all probes whose sequences contained more than two mismatches between any of the 8 genomes and the reference pangenome. When SNPs existed, we included in the design a perfect match variant for each probe allele in the 8 genomes, and only perfect match variant was used to measure gene expression. For technical reasons, probes requiring more than 148 synthesis cycles were also filtered out. Finally, all probes were duplicated. The final design allowed to monitor the expression of 2,740 genes (clusters) based on probing 27,546 distinct genomic regions (only 594 genes found in at least 1 of the 8 strains were not covered). On average, the expression of a gene was monitored via 10 distinct probe sequences (corresponding to 20 measures of intensity since each probe was duplicated).
Retrotranscriptions, labelings, hydridizations and scans of the microarrays were then performed by the GeT-PlaGe platform (Genotoul, Toulouse, France) as follow. RNA were retrotranscribed into double stranded DNA using Superscript Double Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen). The ratios 260/230 and 260/280 were greater than 1.8 and the concentrations greater than 150 ng/μl. According to the recommendations of the supplier, double stranded DNAs were labeled using One Color DNA Labeling (NimbleGen, Roche Diagnostics, France) and hybridizations were carried out using the NimbleGen Hybridization Kit and the Sample Tracking Control Kit (NimbleGen, Roche Diagnostics, France). Hybridized microarrays were scanned using a MS200 scanner (Roche Diagnostics, France) with a resolution of 5 μm.
The processing of the microarray data relied on custom Perl and R scripts. Measured intensities of the probes corresponding to the core genome (1345 genes) where quantile normalized towards a reference distribution obtained as a median over 16 hybridizations. The transformation specific to each array adjusted on the core genome was then also applied to the variable gene pool. For each hybridization, we computed an aggregated expression index for each gene in the corresponding strain as a median of the normalized intensities for the perfect match probes. After visual quality check based on the distribution of probe intensities, most strains were represented by two biological replicates (1 for CIRM 134, 3 for CIRM 514 and 516). Finally, the log2-transformed measures made on biological replicates were averaged for the subsequent correlation analysis with the immunological phenotype data. All microarray data are under submission with Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?token=yzenwcgivjslroj&acc=GSE87574).
Proteomic analysis of bacterial surface
Surface proteins of several strains were detected using three complementary methods: trypsin-shaving, guanidine hydrochloride extraction and CyDye Cyanine surface labeling. All these methods were previously fully described in ref. 19.
Association between anti-inflammatory phenotype of P. freudenreichii strains and the genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data
The strategy used to associate genomic, transcriptomic and surface proteomic informations with anti-inflammatory phenotypes was to perform a regression study of phenotypes against omics features. Then candidates were selected based on the resulting adjusted p-values and R2s. The anti-inflammatory phenotype was based on IL-10 induction levels on PBMC responses, while predictors were omics information: presence/absence pattern for genomics and proteomics and expression levels for transcriptomics. The study was performed for each omics data type independently, before integrating the results from the 3 omics types to select the candidate genes for inactivation. For all omics types, we used linear mixed models to account for the multiplicity (x4) of PBMC donors. We regressed IL-10 induction levels against omics information (fixed effect), strain and donor (random effects); this is our full model. To assess the significance of the fixed effect, we also regressed IL-10 levels against strain and donor as random effects; this is our nested model with no omics effect but the same random effects as the full model. The p-value and fraction of variance explained (R2) by the omics effect were computed by comparing the full and nested models using either an ANOVA (p-value) or predicted IL-10 levels in both models (R2) (R functions: lmer from package lme443 for the mixed models, anova and predict for the p-value and R-squared). The regression coefficient, which gives the direction (sign) and size of the omics effect, was recovered from the full model. Each cluster of orthologues for which omics information was available was tested individually and we corrected p-values using the fdr procedures to account for multiplicity of testing.
Selection of candidate genes to be inactivated
Following the genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic correlation analysis, the clusters of orthologous were ordered according their R2 (fraction of IL-10 variance explained) for each omics type. The clusters containing only one CDS from one strain were filtered out. This filter led to the elimination of the strain-specific genes (in other words, genes without homology in any of the other sequenced strains) to give priority to genes shared by at least two strains. The clusters are divided into two groups according to the sign of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic regression coefficient. For each method, a positive sign means that, for all the strains having a representative in this cluster, the presence of the gene/protein or level of mRNA is positively correlated to the level of IL-10 production. A negative coefficient reflects the absence of the gene, protein or mRNA representative of the cluster in the strongly anti-inflammatory strains. Candidate genes were first filtered out to have coherent signs, and thus effects, across omics types. Then, the five candidate genes deemed most associated with IL-10 production levels (i.e highest R2) were chosen, omics type by omics type, for further validation.
Construction of the genetically modified strains
The insertional inactivation of genes was conducted as previously described17. Briefly, a suicide vector was constructed by inserting a chloramphenicol resistance gene in a pUC18 plasmid. In the resulting pUC:CmR plasmid, an internal fragment of about 500-bp of the coding sequence of the candidate gene of the strain of interest was cloned. The strains of Pf to be tested were transformed with the resulting vector and transformants were selected on YEL agar medium with chloramphenicol. The insertion of the vector in the chromosome was checked by PCR detection of the chloramphenicol gene that should be positive. The stability of the insertion was checked in YEL without chloramphenicol. The plasmids used in this work are listed on line in the supplementary Table S2 and the sequences of the probes in the supplementary Table S3
How to cite this article: Deutsch, S.M. et al. Identification of proteins involved in the anti-inflammatory properties of Propionibacterium freudenreichii by means of a multi-strain study. Sci. Rep. 7, 46409; doi: 10.1038/srep46409 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work was part of the “SURFING” project, Starter SURFace against Inflammation of the Gut, grant number: ANR-2010-ALIA-016, financed by the French National Agency for Research (ANR).
About this article
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/