The structure of Lactococcus lactis thioredoxin reductase reveals molecular features of photo-oxidative damage


The NADPH-dependent homodimeric flavoenzyme thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) provides reducing equivalents to thioredoxin, a key regulator of various cellular redox processes. Crystal structures of photo-inactivated thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) from the Gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus lactis have been determined. These structures reveal novel molecular features that provide further insight into the mechanisms behind the sensitivity of this enzyme toward visible light. We propose that a pocket on the si-face of the isoalloxazine ring accommodates oxygen that reacts with photo-excited FAD generating superoxide and a flavin radical that oxidize the isoalloxazine ring C7α methyl group and a nearby tyrosine residue. This tyrosine and key residues surrounding the oxygen pocket are conserved in enzymes from related bacteria, including pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus. Photo-sensitivity may thus be a widespread feature among bacterial TrxR with the described characteristics, which affords applications in clinical photo-therapy of drug-resistant bacteria.


The protein disulfide reductase thioredoxin (Trx) maintains thiol groups in a reduced form through thiol-disulfide exchange reactions involving a redox-active WCXXC motif. Trx also provides reducing equivalents to enzymes like ribonucleotide reductase, peroxiredoxins and methionine sulfoxide reductase1. The recycling of Trx is catalysed by the homodimeric flavoprotein thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) that utilizes electrons from NADPH which are shuttled through a tightly bound FAD co-enzyme and a redox active dithiol motif. The TrxR monomers in bacteria, fungi and plants are about 35 kDa and composed of an NADPH- and an FAD-binding domain. By contrast, the monomers of TrxR from mammals, dipteran insects and protozoan parasites are larger (ca 50–55 kDa) and harbor an interface domain and a C-terminal flexible extension with an additional redox-active motif. In mammalian enzymes this motif contains a selenocysteine residue, while in e.g. Drosophila melanogaster this is replaced by a cysteine apparently without altering the catalytic efficiency2. Based on pioneering work on the three-dimensional structure and biophysical characteristics of Escherichia coli TrxR (EcTrxR) it was proposed that this bacterial enzyme undergoes a major molecular re-arrangement from the so-called Flavin Oxidizing (FO) conformation to the Flavin Reducing (FR) conformation in order to complete a catalytic cycle3,4,5. The FR conformation structure of EcTrxR in complex with Trx indeed confirmed a 66° rotation of the NADPH domain relative to the FAD domain, which relocates NADPH for hydride transfer to FAD and positions the TrxR CXXC motif in proximity of Trx6. Mammalian TrxR does not undergo such a conformational change during catalysis and the reducing equivalents delivered on the re-face of FAD are instead directly transferred to a redox-active CVNVGC motif positioned on the si-face7,8. Subsequently, the electrons are transferred to the C-terminal redox center, in turn reducing the CXXC motif in Trx. These mechanistic differences make TrxR an attractive target for antimicrobial drugs and a range of inhibitors have been explored for this purpose9,10.

The physiological importance of Trx and TrxR are highly dependent on the lifestyle of the organisms as well as access to alternative redox control systems and antioxidant enzymes. For example in E. coli and other glutathione-producing bacteria, Trx is complemented by glutaredoxin as an electron donor to ribonucleotide reductase, whereas glutathione-negative bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus lack this pathway11,12. The function of Trx as an electron donor to peroxiredoxins is particularly important in catalase-negative bacteria that rely on thiol-dependent peroxidases to remove damaging peroxides. Many lactic acid bacteria (LAB) lack both glutathione and catalase, suggesting that Trx plays a particularly central role in protection against oxidative stress in these bacteria. Lactococcus lactis, an industrially important LAB model bacterium, contains a TrxR that recycles two Trx (TrxA and TrxD) as well as NrdH, a glutaredoxin-like protein providing electrons to ribonucleotide reductase class Ib13. Additionally, it was recently discovered that reducing equivalents for ribonucleotide reduction can be provided in a TrxR-independent manner through flavoredoxin14. This may explain why knock-out mutants lacking either TrxR or Trx are viable even under oxidative stress conditions15. While investigating the biochemical properties of L. lactis TrxR (LlTrxR) we discovered that the enzyme is susceptible to photo-inactivation by visible light in an oxygen-dependent manner16. This inactivation coincided with a shift in the absorbance spectrum of the tightly bound FAD co-enzyme and oxidation of an isoalloxazine methyl group. To characterize the consequences of this photo-oxidation process in greater detail the three-dimensional structure of inactivated LlTrxR is here solved by X-ray crystallography. We propose possible mechanisms that account for the observed oxidative damage of the enzyme.


TrxR from L. lactis is sensitive to photo-inactivation

We have previously shown that recombinant TrxR from L. lactis is inactivated by visible light in vitro, while the corresponding enzyme from E. coli is more resistant to photo-inactivation under these conditions16. In order to evaluate the sensitivity of native TrxR in an environment resembling the conditions in vivo, cell extracts of mid-late exponential phase cultures of L. lactis and E. coli K-12 were subjected to irradiation over a period of 12 h and TrxR activity was measured at different time points by use of a coupled assay with Trx, applying DTNB as the final electron acceptor. A marked decrease in TrxR activity was observed in the L. lactis cell extracts over the course of irradiation, while the activity in the E. coli cell extract was essentially unchanged (Fig. 1). After 12 h a ~65% drop in activity was observed in L. lactis cell extract. This apparent slower rate of inactivation of native LlTrxR compared to the recombinant enzyme may be due to light-quenching by endogenous chromophores in the cell extracts.

Figure 1: Inactivation of native TrxR in cell extracts.

Activity of TrxR quantified by DTNB reduction, was assayed in light exposed cell extracts from L. lactis (a, ■) and E. coli (b, ) by adding 0.2 mM DTNB, 0.2 mM NADPH and 5 μM of the respective Trx. “No Light” controls ( (a) and × (b)) were samples wrapped in foil; these exhibited no loss of activity. A similar relative change in activity was obtained in assays without addition of Trx (data not shown). All experiments were performed with three biological replicates.

Overall structure of LlTrxR

The overall structure of LlTrxR is similar to other low molecular weight (LMW) TrxRs3,17 with a dimeric organization in which each monomer is composed of NADPH and FAD binding domains (Fig. 2). The secondary structure of each subunit consists of 11 α-helices and 19 β-sheets. The FAD-domain consists of residues 1–112 and 243–308 and the NADPH-domain consists of residues 116–239. The LlTrxR structures were obtained mainly in the FR conformation (Fig. 2a,c), which was unexpected since all available structures of LMW TrxR from other organisms are in the FO conformation, except for the engineered complex between EcTrxR and EcTrx6. LlTrxR crystallized in the FO conformation (Fig. 2b,d) only under reducing conditions in the presence of DTT (Table 1). The propensity of LlTrxR to crystallize in the FR conformation may indicate that the enzyme is stabilized in this conformation. Superposition of LlTrxR Cα-atoms with the structure of EcTrxR3,6, gives RMSD of 0.426 Å and 1.137 Å for the enzymes in FR (Fig. 2a,c) and FO conformation (Fig. 2b,d), respectively. The relative orientation of the structures thus matches perfectly with the E. coli enzyme and consolidates the catalytic model proposed by Waksman et al. (1994) where the NADPH domain rotates 66° relative to the FAD domain in order to switch between the FO and FR conformations in the catalytic cycle.

Figure 2: Overall structure of LlTrxR.

Superposition of LlTrxR (green) and EcTrxR (violet) in FR (a) and FO (b) conformations with RMSD values of 0.426 and 1.137 Å, respectively. The FAD and NADPH domains are connected by two anti-parallel β-strands (amino acid residues 113–115 and 240–242). In both the FR and FO conformations the FAD (red sticks), as well as NADP+ and the NADP+ analog AADP+ (blue sticks in the FR conformation) align well as indicated. The active site disulfide bond is marked as yellow spheres. Close-up of the active site of LlTrxR (green) and EcTrxR (violet) in the FR (c) and FO (d) conformations, indicating that FAD and NADP+/AADP+ are oriented identically in the two enzymes. PDB IDs for the EcTrxR structures are 1F6M and 1TDE for FR and FO conformation, respectively.

Table 1 Data collection and refinement statistics (molecular replacement).

Oxidation of the FAD co-enzyme and Tyr237 in photo-inactivated LlTrxR

No apparent change in the overall structure of LlTrxR in the FR conformation was observed upon exposure to visible light. Close examination of the isoalloxazine ring however reveals increased electron densities around the C7α methyl group over the course of irradiation (Fig. 3a–f), even though the FAD co-enzyme in general has well-defined electron densities with B-factors typically in the range from 20–24 Å2. This observation is in accordance with our previous mass spectrometry data demonstrating formation of an aldehyde group in FAD extracted from light-inactivated LlTrxR, which was concluded to be confined to the C7α methyl group based on the spectrophotometric features16. Moreover, an increase in electron density at the meta-position (ortho to the hydroxyl group) of Tyr237, located 4.4 Å from C7α is observed as a function of light-exposure (Fig. 3a–f). This density most likely represents the formation of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA). Mass spectrometric analysis of proteolytic digests of photo-inactivated LlTxR indeed confirms a mass shift of 16 Da confined to Tyr237 (Supplementary Figure 1). Tyr237 is only close to the isoalloxazine ring when LlTrxR is in the FR conformation (Fig. 3a), suggesting that photo-oxidation reactions are primarily taking place while the enzyme is in this conformation. In the FO conformation, Tyr237 is distant from the flavin-binding site and another tyrosine (Tyr133) is in proximity to the isoalloxazine ring (4.9 Å from C7α), but no indications of oxidation of Tyr133 were observed in the irradiated structures of LlTrxR. Remarkably, Tyr237 appears to be conserved among most TrxR from Gram-positive bacteria in the phylum Firmicutes, but is replaced mainly by Ala or Phe in other organisms (Supplementary Figure 2).

Figure 3: Oxidation of the isoalloxazine ring and Tyr237 in photo-inactivated LlTrxR.

Increased electron density around the C7α methyl group of the isoalloxazine ring, and the meta-position of Tyr237 in LlTrxR develops over the course of irradiation (0–240 min). The σA-weighted 2FoFc maps (grey) have been contoured at 1.0 σ. The difference FoFc maps (green/red) have been contoured at ± 3.0 σ, respectively. The C7α methyl group and the meta-position of Tyr237 develop increased difference densities mainly in the σA-weighted 2FoFc maps and FoFc maps, respectively.

An oxygen pocket on the si-face of the isoalloxazine ring

The observed oxygen- and triplet isoalloxazine-dependent photo-inactivation of LlTrxR16 suggests that molecular oxygen is positioned in the vicinity of the FAD and interacts with the photo-excited co-enzyme. A closer look at the isoalloxazine ring indeed reveals a pocket that potentially may accommodate molecular oxygen due to its hydrophobic character. Met43 positioned on the si-face bends away from the isoalloxazine towards Pro15 and the sidechains of Met18 and Met67 (Fig. 4a) and as a consequence a pocket on the si-face is formed. In the space between the β-carbon of Met43 and the isoalloxazine ring (7.2–7.4 Å distance to N10 and N5) a well-defined electron density appears, assigned to a water molecule perfectly centered above the central ring of the isoalloxazine. This water molecule is present in all structures listed in Table 1. The water is in hydrogen bond distance from the 2′-ribityl hydroxyl group (2.8 Å) and the alcohol group of Thr46 (2.8 Å), and the distance from the water to the N5 and N10 atom of the isoalloxazine is 3.5–3.6 Å (Fig. 4a). A closer look at the electrostatic environment on the si-face reveals several hydrophobic residues, most noteworthy are Ile286, Ile49, Leu63 and the β- and γ-carbons of Met43 that together with the π-electron cloud of the conjugated isoalloxazine ring system constitute an overall hydrophobic environment facilitating accommodation of O2 (Fig. 4c). In the presence of O2 at this location, it can be speculated that the Thr46 sidechain can flip so the methyl group points towards the O2, while the 2′-ribityl hydroxyl group can form a hydrogen bond with the 4′-ribityl hydroxyl group. These changes will further increase the hydrophobicity of the si-face, thus increasing the O2 affinity. The re-face of the isoalloxazine ring in the FO conformation is occupied by the Cys134-Cys137 disulfide while in the FR conformation it is surrounded by hydrophilic residues (Asp154, Glu158, Ser155 and Gln285). These features further underlines that the si-face open space is the most likely site of O2 accommodation and thus oxidant generation. The oxygen pocket described here is conserved in Staphylococcus aureus TrxR (SaTrxR), the most closely related structure-determined enzyme (53% sequence identity).

Figure 4: An oxygen pocket on the si-face of the FAD isoalloxazine ring.

(a) LlTrxR has a pocket on the si-face of the isoalloxazine ring occupied by a water molecule (red sphere), which is in hydrogen bonding distance from the hydroxyl group of the Thr46 sidechain and the 2′-ribityl hydroxyl group of the FAD. Met43 bends towards Pro15 exposing a pocket which is occupied with a water molecule in all obtained structures of LlTrxR. (b) In EcTrxR (PDB 1F6M) Met43LlTrxR is substituted with Leu44EcTrxR that is centered at the si-face of the isoalloxazine ring and restricts access due to steric hindrance. In addition, Ser64LlTrxR is replaced by the more bulky Met66EcTrxR that hinders Leu44EcTrxR from bending towards Pro15. Distances are given in Å and marked with dashed lines. (c) Electrostatic environment at the si-face of isoalloxazine in LlTrxR as viewed from the re-face showing the pocket where O2 can be accommodated. The pocket is confined by the π-electron cloud of the isoalloxazine, key hydrophobic residues Ile49, Ile286, Met43 and the methyl group of Thr46. (d) Corresponding electrostatic environment at the si-face of isoalloxazine in EcTrxR, where the si-face pocket is blocked by Leu44. (e) Alignment of selected residues that are positioned near the isoalloxazine si-face (sequences of structure determined TrxR are marked with an asterisk).

Even though several residues on the si-face of the isoxoalloxazine ring are conserved among TrxR (Fig. 4e) some subtle yet crucial differences in the local environment are observed. Met43LlTrxR appears to be conserved among bacteria in the phylum Firmicutes (Supplementary Figure 2), but in EcTrxR this residue is substituted with Leu44EcTrxR that is centered at the si-face of the isoalloxazine with a 3.8–4.0 Å distance from the δ-carbon to the N10 and N5 atoms (Fig. 4b). In addition, Ser64LlTrxR is replaced by the more bulky Met66EcTrxR that hinders Leu44EcTrxR from bending towards Pro15. Leu44EcTrxR thus blocks the pocket on the si-face of the isoalloxazine and restricts access of O2 (Fig. 4d). Noticeably, all available bacterial TrxR structures except those from L. lactis and S. aureus display Leu/Ile in similar positions as Leu44 in EcTrxR (Fig. 4e).


Based on the structural information provided here we propose mechanisms that may account for the observed photo-inactivation of LlTrxR with the involvement of photo-excited FAD and O2 (Fig. 5). The initial step involves light absorption by the isoalloxazine ring and subsequent electron transfer from the ring to O2 with concomitant generation of superoxide radicals (O2−.) and an isoalloxazine radical-cation. Subsequent rapid, spontaneous dismutation of O2−.would give H2O218, as observed in other flavin photo-oxidation reactions19. The isoalloxazine radical-cation may then undergo one of two processes: electron transfer with the nearby Tyr237 to regenerate the isoalloxazine and generate a Tyr237 radical-cation (which would be expected to rapidly deprotonate to give a Tyr phenoxyl radical due to the very low pKa of these species), or deprotonation at one of the ring methyl groups. Such reactions are supported by literature data on the intramolecular photo-oxidation of target substrates by flavins subject to blue light, by electron transfer pathways19.

Figure 5: Proposed mechanisms for oxidation of Tyr237 and the FAD methyl group.

Upon photo-induced excitation of FAD an electron is transferred to O2 generating superoxide. The one-electron deficient flavin cation radical can oxidize Tyr237 forming a radical-cation, which rapidly deprotonates to give Tyr phenoxyl radical. The Tyr phenoxyl radical is a target for superoxide and undergoes rapid reaction to give hydroperoxides at either C3 or C5. The resulting Tyr-OOH decays to give 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA). The flavin radical-cation can upon deprotonation at C7α generate a primary C7α radical (R-CH2.). In the presence of O2 this would lead to formation of a peroxyl radical, while in the presence of O2−. a hydroperoxide would be formed. Subsequent decay of the peroxyl radical via the Russell mechanism, or decomposition of the hydroperoxide, would yield an aldehyde.

Tyr phenoxyl radicals undergo rapid reaction with O2−./HOO. to give hydroperoxides, with these being formed at either C3/C5 or C1 due to the high spin density at these sites20,21. Such peroxides are unstable and undergo ready decay to the corresponding catechols, potentially accounting for the formation of 3,4-dihydroxyphenyalanine (DOPA) from Tyr237. An alternative route for decay of the isoalloxazine radical-cation involves deprotonation at a methyl group (a well-established decay pathway of radical-cations22,23) to give a primary alkyl radical (–CH2.). In the presence of O2 this would lead to formation of a peroxyl radical, while in the presence of O2−.a hydroperoxide would be formed. Subsequent decay of the peroxyl radical via the Russell mechanism24, or decomposition of the hydroperoxide25, would yield an aldehyde.

An alternative route to oxidation of the C7α methyl group may be direct hydrogen atom abstraction from the methyl group by the Tyr237 phenoxyl radical (i.e. Tyr237-O. + flavin-CH3 → Tyr237-OH + flavin-CH2. → formyl group) but such a pathway would be energetically less favorable due to the relative bond strengths of the C-H and O-H bonds. An alternative process involving formation of singlet oxygen (1O2) by the excited state isoalloxazine could also be envisaged, with this then undergoing decay to H2O2 or formation of an endoperoxide from the Tyr237 residue26. Subsequent decay of the unstable endoperoxide, potentially involving radical formation26, could account for the formation of DOPA from Tyr237 and oxidation of the C7α methyl group on the isoalloxazine ring to the formyl group.

The structure of LlTrxR also reveals an oxygen pocket at the si-face of the isoalloxazine ring, which is absent in EcTrxR. EcTrxR has previously been shown be highly photo-reactive and forms high yields of FAD semiquinones upon irradiation under anaerobic reaction conditions27. In light of the data obtained in the present study, it may therefore be suggested that the difference in photo-sensitivity between LlTrxR and EcTrxR is related to the accessibility of O2 in the active site, rather than the light-absorbing properties of the isoalloxazine ring per se. Besides its proposed role in photo-sensitivity the oxygen pocket might also have implications for the ability of these enzymes to reduce O2. We have reported that LlTrxR displays a ~10-fold increased rate of O2 reduction in the presence of NADPH as compared to EcTrxR16. LlTrxR thus shows a similar tendency to reduce O2 as the TrxR homologue AhpF, a dedicated reductase of the peroxide scavenger AhpC in eubacteria28,29. Interestingly, X-ray crystal structures of AhpF from S. typhimurium and E. coli (PDB 1HYU and 1FL2, respectively), also display a pocket on the si-face of the isoalloxazine and a tyrosine (Tyr344) located in the same position relative to the C7α as Tyr237LlTrxR. It can thus be hypothesized that AhpF also may be sensitive to photo-oxidation. However, it is important to emphasize that a direct comparison between reduction and photo-activation of O2 cannot be made since the molecular mechanisms and kinetic properties of these processes are different.

The novel molecular features of LlTrxR reported here provide insight into the photo-inactivation mechanism involving a protein-bound FAD acting as a photosensitizer that is highly relevant in a wider context. The conservation of Tyr237 and Met43 among TrxR from related Gram-positive bacteria suggests that photo-sensitivity may be widespread among these types of organisms. This opens up interesting perspectives in terms of clinical light treatment, e.g. blue light therapy of pathogenic and multi-drug resistant bacteria such as S. aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes and Bacillus anthracis, which all have TrxR predicted to harbour the described oxygen pocket.


Photo-inactivation of native TrxR in cell extracts

Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris (strain MG1363) was grown in SA medium30 containing 1% (w/v) glucose and 2 mg/L lipoic acid (GSAL medium). E. coli K-12 (strain MG1655) was grown in LB-medium. One liter synchronized cell culture (in biological triplicate) at exponential phase (OD600 0.6–0.7) was placed on ice for 30 min and then centrifuged (4 °C). The cell pellet was resuspended in 0.9% NaCl and distributed in ten 2 mL screw-cap microcentrifuge tubes, centrifuged, and the pellets were stored at −20 °C until use. Proteins were extracted by adding 600 μL 100 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA and 400 μL glass beads ≤106 μm (Sigma) to each tube and performing bead beating on a FastPrep FP120 homogenizer (Qbiogene), setting 6 for 30 s, followed by 1 min rest on ice. Bead beating was repeated 6 times followed by centrifugation for 15 min at 13,000 g. Benzonase (2 μL) was added to pooled supernatants (~4.5 mL) and incubated for 1 h at 21 °C. The protein concentration was determined (Bio-Rad Protein Assay, Life Science Research) using BSA as a standard and the samples were aliquoted and stored at −20 °C. Cell extracts were thawed, diluted 1:1 with 100 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA and transferred to original 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes with 6 × 3mm magnets, and placed on a stirrer in a cold room at 4 °C. The samples were irradiated with a 1225 Lumen (21 W) lamp at 15 cm distance as previously described16. Control samples wrapped in foil are referred to as “No Light”. After 0, 1.5, 3, 6, 9 and 12 h cell extracts were removed and stored at −20 °C for subsequent activity measurements. TrxR activity was assayed as 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) reduction monitored at 412 nm in 150 μL format with 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 0.20 mM DTNB and 0.20 mM NADPH. For L. lactis 30 μL of undiluted cell extract was used in the assay while the E. coli cell extracts were diluted 3 times in 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA before being added to the assay mixture. The activity of the cell extracts was measured directly or after addition of their respective recombinant thioredoxins (5 μM final concentration), LlTrxA and EcTrx113. The addition of recombinant thioredoxin in the assay boosted the signal ~4 and ~2.3 times for L. lactis and E. coli, respectively. The initial activities were determined in at least technical triplicates for each biological replicate.

Photo-inactivation of recombinant TrxR

Production and purification of recombinant His-tagged L. lactis and E. coli TrxR and Trx and subsequent light inactivation of TrxR were performed essentially as described previously16. For crystallization trials 50 μM LlTrxR was irradiated for 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 min (with remaining relative initial activities of ~73, 27, 26, 15 and 10%, respectively) and subsequently loaded on a HiLoad Superdex 75 gel filtration column (prep grade, 16/60; GE Healthcare) using 10 mM HEPES, 200 mM NaCl, 2 mM Na-EDTA, pH 7.0 as eluent. Fractions that appeared homogeneous according to the chromatogram and SDS-PAGE were pooled, dialyzed (6−8 kDa MWCO, Spectra/Por 1) against 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM Na-EDTA, pH7.0, and concentrated (Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter unit, 10 kDa MWCO) to 8–10 mg/mL as assessed from absorbance (ɛ456 = 11,300 M−1cm−1)31.

Crystallization and data collection of LlTrxR

Crystals obtained in FR conformation: LlTrxR (2 μL, 8–10 mg/mL) was mixed with 2 μL reservoir buffer and co-crystallized with 1 μL 25 mM NADP+ (Sigma-Aldrich) and equilibrated as hanging-drops over a 500 μL reservoir containing 35% PEG 1500 (Fluka), 400 mM Li2SO4, 20 mM HEPES of pH varying in the range 6.0–8.5. Bright yellow octahedron crystals (100 μm) appeared after about 5 days at 19 °C and grew to about 200 μm in length by 14 days. Crystals of light-exposed (30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min) and light-protected LlTrxR were harvested and flash-cooled directly from the drop without additional cryoprotectants.

Crystals obtained in FO conformation: LlTrxR (2 μL, 8–10 mg/mL) was mixed with 2 μL reservoir buffer, and 2 μL 60 mM DTT and equilibrated as hanging-drops over a 500 μL reservoir containing 20% PEG 4000 (Fluka), 400 mM Li2SO4. Only non-irradiated LlTrxR crystallized under these reducing conditions. Crystals appeared after ~14 days at 19 °C. Crystals were transferred to a cryoprotectant solution consisting of reservoir buffer with 10% ethylene glycol before storing in liquid nitrogen.

Data collection, structure determination and refinement

X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K at I911–3, MAXII, Sweden and at ID30A-1, ESRF, France, with wavelengths ranging from 0.97–1.00 Å. Diffraction data were indexed, integrated, scaled and merged with XDS and XSCALE32 or MOSFLM33. Molecular replacement was performed with the program MOLREP34 from the CCP4 suite35 using the structure of SaTrxR (PDB 4GCM) as the initial search model for the FO conformation, while EcTrxR (PDB 1F6M) was used as template for the FR conformation. Restrained refinement was carried out using Refmac536 and manual inspection was done in Coot37. Local non-crystallographic symmetry restraints were imposed when appropriate. LlTrxR obtained in FR conformation crystallized in space group P412121 with 1 monomer per asymmetric unit, while FO conformations crystallized in P21 with 4 monomers per asymmetric unit. After refinement, the Ramachandran plots of the structures had 94.4–97.3%% residues in favored regions, 2.5–5.0% residues in allowed regions and 0–0.66% residues outliers. Details on the data collection statistics are provided in Table 1. All RMSD values for structural alignments of the Cα-atoms were calculated using the program Superpose in CCP438. Figures displaying structural data were made with PyMOL (

Mass spectrometry

LlTrxR (20 μg; irradiated or light-protected) in 8 M urea, 50 mM NH4CO3 (45 μL) was added to 2.4 μL 100 mM DTT and incubated (40 min, 21 °C), followed by addition of 2.5 μL 200 mM iodoacetamide and incubation in the dark (40 min, 21 °C). After 1:10 dilution with 50 mM NH4CO3, endoproteinase GluC (Roche) was added to the samples in a 1:40 enzyme:protein ratio (w/w) and incubated overnight at 29 °C. Trifluoroacetic acid was added to the digested samples to a final concentration of 0.5% and subjected to StageTip purification with empore C18 disks (3 M) as previously described39. Samples (1 μg) were analysed on a Q-Exactive Orbitrap (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to an EASY-nLC 1000 liquid chromatograph (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Peptides were loaded onto a custom-made nanoLC column (15 cm, C18, 100 Å, 1.9 μm particle size, 75 μm ID) packed into a Picofrit emitter (New Objectives) and eluted using a 70 min gradient at a flow rate of 250 nL min−1. Resolution of 70,000, automatic gain control (AGC) value of 3·106, maximum injection time (IT) of 20 ms and scan range of 300 to 1500 m/z were used for MS scans. MS/MS spectra were acquired in data-dependent mode (Top 10 method) with resolution of 17,500, AGC value of 1·106, and maximum fragmentation accumulation time of 60 ms.

Additional Information

Accession codes: Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes: 5MH4 (FR conformation, no light); 5MIP (FR conformation, 30 min light); 5MIQ (FR conformation, 60 min light); 5MIR (FR conformation, 120 min light); 5MIS (FR conformation, 180 min light); 5MIT (FR conformation, 240 min light); 5MJK (FO conformation, no light).

How to cite this article: Skjoldager, N. et al. The Structure of Lactococcus lactis thioredoxin reductase reveals molecular features of photo-oxidative damage. Sci. Rep. 7, 46282; doi: 10.1038/srep46282 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1

    Arnér, E. S. J. & Holmgren, A. Physiological functions of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase. Eur. J. Biochem 267, 6102–6109 (2000).

  2. 2

    Gromer, S. et al. Active sites of thioredoxin reductases: Why selenoproteins? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12618–12623 (2003).

  3. 3

    Waksman, G., Krishna, T. S. R., Williams, C. H. & Kuriyan, J. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli thioredoxin reductase refined at 2 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 236, 800–816 (1994).

  4. 4

    Mulrooney, S. B. & Williams, C. H. Evidence for two conformational states of thioredoxin reductase from Escherichia coli: use of intrinsic and extrinsic quenchers of flavin fluorescence as probes to observe domain rotation. Protein Sci. 6, 2188–2195 (1997).

  5. 5

    Veine, D. M., Mulrooney, S. B., Wang, P. F. & Williams, C. H. Formation and properties of mixed disulfides between thioredoxin reductase from Escherichia coli and thioredoxin: evidence that cysteine-138 functions to initiate dithiol-disulfide interchange and to accept the reducing equivalent from reduced flavin. Protein Sci. 7, 1441–1450 (1998).

  6. 6

    Lennon, B. W., Williams Jr., C. H. & Ludwig, M. L. Twists in catalysis: Alternating conformations of Escherichia coli thioredoxin reductase. Science 289, 1190–1194 (2000).

  7. 7

    Fritz-Wolf, K., Urig, S. & Becker, K. The structure of human thioredoxin reductase 1 provides insights into C-terminal rearrangements during catalysis. J. Mol. Biol. 370, 116–127 (2007).

  8. 8

    Fritz-Wolf, K., Kehr, S., Stumpf, M., Rahlfs, S. & Becker, K. Crystal structure of the human thioredoxin reductase-thioredoxin complex. Nat. Commun. 2, 383 (2011).

  9. 9

    Saccoccia, F. et al. Thioredoxin reductase and its inhibitors. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 15, 621–646 (2014).

  10. 10

    Gustafsson, T. N. et al. Ebselen and analogs as inhibitors of Bacillus anthracis thioredoxin reductase and bactericidal antibacterials targeting Bacillus species, Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Gen. Subj. 1860, 1265–1271 (2016).

  11. 11

    Kobayashi, K. et al. Essential Bacillus subtilis genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4678–4683 (2003).

  12. 12

    Uziel, O., Borovok, I., Schreiber, R., Cohen, G. & Aharonowitz, Y. Transcriptional regulation of the Staphylococcus aureus thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase genes in response to oxygen and disulfide stress transcriptional regulation of the Staphylococcus aureus thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase genes in response. J. Bacteriol. 186, 326–334 (2004).

  13. 13

    Björnberg, O., Efler, P., Ebong, E. D., Svensson, B. & Hägglund, P. Lactococcus lactis TrxD represents a subgroup of thioredoxins prevalent in Gram-positive bacteria containing WCXDC active site motifs. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 564, 164–172 (2014).

  14. 14

    Chen, J., Shen, J., Solem, C. & Jensen, P. R. A new type of YumC-like ferredoxin (flavodoxin) reductase is involved in ribonucleotide reduction. MBio 6, e01132–15 (2015).

  15. 15

    Efler, P. et al. Two Lactococcus lactis thioredoxin paralogues play different roles in responses to arsenate and oxidative stress. Microbiology 161, 528–538 (2015).

  16. 16

    Björnberg, O. et al. Lactococcus lactis thioredoxin reductase is sensitive to light inactivation. Biochemistry 54, 1628–1637 (2015).

  17. 17

    Kirkensgaard, K. G., Hägglund, P., Finnie, C., Svensson, B. & Henriksen, A. Structure of Hordeum vulgare NADPH-dependent thioredoxin reductase 2. Unwinding the reaction mechanism. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 65, 932–941 (2009).

  18. 18

    Bielski, B. H. J., Cabelli, D. E., Arudi, R. L. & Ross, A. B. Reactivity of HO2/O2 radicals in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 14, 1041–1100 (1985).

  19. 19

    Lechner, R., Kümmel, S. & König, B. Visible light flavin photo-oxidation of methylbenzenes, styrenes and phenylacetic acids. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 9, 1367–1377 (2010).

  20. 20

    Winterbourn, C. C., Parsons-Mair, H. N., Gebicki, S., Gebicki, J. M. & Davies, M. J. Requirements for superoxide-dependent tyrosine hydroperoxide formation in peptides. Biochem. J. 381, 241–248 (2004).

  21. 21

    Möller, M. N., Hatch, D. M., Kim, H. Y. H. & Porter, N. A. Superoxide reaction with tyrosyl radicals generates para-hydroperoxy and para-hydroxy derivatives of tyrosine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 16773–16780 (2012).

  22. 22

    Davies, M. J. & Gilbert, B. C. Free radical reactions. Fragmentation and rearrangements in aqueous solution. Adv. Detail. React. Mech. 1, 35–81 (1991).

  23. 23

    Baciocchi, E. Side-chain reactivity of aromatic radical cations. Acta Chem. Scand. 44, 645–652 (1990).

  24. 24

    Russell, G. A. Deuterium-isotope effects in the autoxidation of aralkyl hydrocarbons. Mechanism of the interaction of peroxy radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79, 3871–3877 (1957).

  25. 25

    Davies, M. J. Protein oxidation and peroxidation. Biochem. J. 473, 805–825 (2016).

  26. 26

    Wright, A., Bubb, W. A., Hawkins, C. L. & Davies, M. J. Singlet oxygen-mediated protein oxidation: evidence for the formation of reactive side chain peroxides on tyrosine residues. Photochem. Photobiol. 76, 35–46 (2002).

  27. 27

    Zanetti, G., Williams, C. H. & Massey, V. Influence of photoirradiation on the oxidation-reduction state of thioredoxin reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 243, 4013–4019 (1968).

  28. 28

    Niimura, Y., Poole, L. B. & Massey, V. Amphibacillus xylanus NADH oxidase and Salmonella typhimurium alkyl-hydroperoxide reductase flavoprotein components show extremely high scavenging activity for both alkyl hydroperoxide and hydrogen peroxide in the presence of S. typhimurium alkyl-hydroperoxide reductase 22-kDa protein component. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25645–25650 (1995).

  29. 29

    Poole, L. B. Bacterial defenses against oxidants: mechanistic features of cysteine-based peroxidases and their flavoprotein reductases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 433, 240–254 (2005).

  30. 30

    Jensen, P. R. & Hammer, K. Minimal requirements for exponential-growth of Lactococcus lactis . Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 4363–4366 (1993).

  31. 31

    Williams, C. H., Zanetti, G., Arscott, L. D. & McAllister, J. K. Lipoamide dehydrogenase, glutathione reductase, thioredoxin reductase, and thioredoxin. J. Biol. Chem. 242, 5226–5231 (1967).

  32. 32

    Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010).

  33. 33

    Battye, T. G. G., Kontogiannis, L., Johnson, O., Powell, H. R. & Leslie, A. G. W. iMOSFLM: A new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM . Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 271–281 (2011).

  34. 34

    Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. MOLREP: An automated program for molecular replacement. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 30, 1022–1025 (1997).

  35. 35

    Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235–242 (2011).

  36. 36

    Vagin, A. A. et al. REFMAC 5 dictionary: Organization of prior chemical knowledge and guidelines for its use. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2184–2195 (2004).

  37. 37

    Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).

  38. 38

    Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2256–2268 (2004).

  39. 39

    Rappsilber, J., Mann, M. & Ishihama, Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1896–1906 (2007).

Download references


The Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer was granted by the Danish Council for Independent Research | Natural Sciences (grant nr. 11-106246). Technical University of Denmark is acknowledged for a PhD stipend (NS) and The Danish Research Foundation, Nordic Bioscience A/S and Technical University of Denmark are acknowledged for a joint PhD scholarship (MR). MJD is supported by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant no: NNF13OC0004294). The MAXIV and ESRF synchrotrons is acknowledged for beam-time and support during data-collection. The research presented has received funding from BioStruct-X (EC FP7 grant agreement N°283570) and DANSCATT (the Danish agency and for Science, Technology and Innovation).

Author information

P.Ha., P.Hä., and B.S. conceived and directed the project; N.S., O.B., P.Ha., P.Hä. designed experiments; N.S. produced proteins and performed biochemical experiments. N.S., M.B.B. and P.Ha. performed X-ray crystallographic experiments and analysed the data; M.R. and P.Hä. performed mass spectrometry and analysed the data; N.S., M.R., O.B., M.J.D., B.S., P.Ha., P.Hä. discussed results and wrote the paper.

Correspondence to Pernille Harris or Per Hägglund.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skjoldager, N., Blanner Bang, M., Rykær, M. et al. The structure of Lactococcus lactis thioredoxin reductase reveals molecular features of photo-oxidative damage. Sci Rep 7, 46282 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.