Abstract
We investigate analytically, numerically, and experimentally the lowloss supermode propagation in a coupled acoustic waveguide complex within a broadband. The waveguide complex is implemented with air channels coupled via an ultrathin metafluid layer. We analytically derive the field distribution of incident sound needed for producing acoustic supermodes, and verify the periodically revival propagation in coupled waveguide systems numerically and experimentally. We find out that the supermode wavelength becomes longer for higher mode order or lower frequency. We have also demonstrated the robust propagation of supermodes in broadband. Our scheme can in principle be extended to three dimensions and the ultrasound regime with simplicity and may promote applications of highfidelity signal transfer in complicated acoustic networks.
Introduction
Anomalous manipulations of acoustic energy flow have received many attentions during the past decades, such as negative refraction/reflection^{1,2,3,4,5}, collimation^{6,7,8}, superresolution imaging^{9,10,11}, cloaking^{12,13,14,15,16}, rainbow trapping^{17,18,19}, beam acceleration^{20,21,22}, and topological transportation^{23,24,25,26,27,28}, etc. The recent advances in acoustical metamaterials and metasurfaces provide a broad platform which enables those intriguing phenomena to be realized in experiments^{29,30}. Due to diffraction, acoustic devices for anomalous wavesteering in free space are inevitably to be large in size. Therefore, a more promising candidate, viz. acoustic waveguide networks, is proposed for device integration, where the size may markedly decrease due to the lack of cutoff in rigid channels^{10,11,25,27}. Previous works have shown that sound propagation in waveguide networks can be much more intricate than that in bulk media^{25,27}. For example, the acoustic waves propagating in one waveguide may easily spread to the whole system through couplings. In practice, such couplinginduced diffraction is undesirable, since the information carried by acoustic signals will be smeared or considerably modified by diffraction during the propagation. It thus should be meaningful, both in physics and in engineering, to explore the possibility to realize nondiffracting acoustic wave propagation for highfidelity signal transfer in integrated networks.
In this paper, we propose to employ supermodes to implement nondiffracting propagation in one type of acoustic networks, viz., an array of coupled waveguides. The resulting device simply consists of five air channels coupled via four gratings. We rigorously derive the desired field distribution of incident waves for producing acoustic supermodes. Remarkably, the supermode propagations are featured with broadband stability and low loss, since the device has no resonant structures with frequencydependent responses. We further demonstrate those intriguing properties of acoustic supermodes through proofofconcept experiments. With the simple design and fabrication, our proposal can be in principle extended to three dimensions and the ultrasound regime, and make a significant step towards the application of highfidelity transportation of broadband acoustic signals in integrated acoustic networks.
Results
We start from investigating the acoustic supermode in an array of N coupled waveguides based on the coupledmode theory, with only the nearestneighbor coupling being considered^{31}. The scalar wave equation for sound takes the form of . As shown in Fig. 1(a), we investigate a twodimensional waveguide complex in xz plane. Here, the pressure and speed of sound are expressed into and , where k(x, z) represents the wave number. From the aforementioned equations, we can deduce the governing equation . For a linear and scalar system, we separate the variables to have and , where β is the propagation constant along z direction. It should be pointed out that β > k(x, y) for a guiding mode. Thus, k_{x} should be imaginary, indicating that the field along x direction is evanescent. Substituting and into the governing equation, we will obtain
which further leads to and . Here, p_{0} is a constant that could be chosen to be zero by setting a proper coordinate origin, and F(x) is the mode profile along x direction. For an array of N coupled waveguides, F(x) can be expressed into a discrete form of , with A_{l} being the weight of a propagating mode in one waveguide. Therefore, the mode profile of the whole system can be written into
In this work, we only consider the nearestneighbor coupling (the tightbinding model) and set all waveguides identical and equally spaced. Substituting Eq. (2) into the governing equation, we can finally derive the matrix
where k_{0} is the wave number in free space, C is the coupling coefficient between nearest neighbor waveguides, and is the selfcoupling coefficient for the ith waveguide. Due to different boundary conditions, the selfcoupling coefficients , do not equal to . Therefore, we may define , , and . After numerous mathematical deductions, the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of Eq. (3) are derived to be ref. 32
where m is the mode order, and l is the waveguide number. In Eq. (4), β_{m} also represents the propagation constant of mordered supermode. It is interesting that the mode intensity in an air channel will be zero on condition that ml/(N + 1) is an integer, and the mode intensity will be nonzero for all air channels if N + 1 is a prime number. From the above analysis, we derive that acoustic supermodes are actually the eigenmodes of the waveguide complex.
In this paper, the studied waveguide complex comprises five air channels segregated by four gratings (N = 5), as illustrated in Fig. 1(a,b). In our design, the channels and gratings are fabricated with Aluminum alloy that is treated as rigid to air. Propagating inside the waveguide complex, acoustic waves in one channel will be allowed to tunnel into the neighboring ones through periodic gratings. Based on the effective medium approach, acoustic gratings can be equivalent to metafluid layers with nondispersive bulk modulus and density tensor in the long wave condition^{10,11}. In respect that there are no local resonances as well as weak damping in air channels and metafluid layers, the wave propagation in this coupled waveguide array is featured with low energy loss in broadband. For the structural parameters, the thickness, slit width, and slit period of gratings are t = 1.4 cm, s = 0.5 cm, and p = 2 cm, respectively. The width of air channels w = 2.6 cm. According to Eq. (4), we can predict that there are five supermodes supported by the waveguide array since N = 5, and analytically obtain the weight factors of all air channels for each supermode by ignoring δκ.
Next, we simulate the sound propagation in an array of five coupled waveguides in Fig. 2(a–f), where the thermoviscous damping effect is taken into consideration (see the Method section). In the numerical simulation, the total waveguide length is 90 cm. There are 35 slits connecting two adjacent channels. For convenience, we number the channels as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 from below. Figure 2(a–e) show the normalized pressure field distributions for five different supermodes at m = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, where the operation frequency f = 4 kHz and the excitation condition is determined by Eq. (4). The results clearly present the stable propagation of acoustic supermodes, where the field pattern is periodically repeated along z axis. We find out that the supermodes can be classified into symmetric and antisymmetric ones for odd and even orders, respectively. To be specific, in Fig. 2(a,b), the supermode at m = 1 takes the form of , while the one at m = 2 is . From the field maps, we note that the waveguides at (m, l, N) = (2, 3, 5), (3, 2, 5), (3, 4, 5), and (4, 3, 5) are nearly “dark” due to destructive interferences, in well agreement with the aforementioned criterion that ml/(N + 1) should be an integer for . It should be pointed out that the acoustic supermode can be easily excited in experiments, since there are only two types of coupling between adjacent air channels, viz., inphase and outofphase couplings. Hence, we only need a simple voltage inverter circuit with tunable current amplitude and 0(or π)phase to drive a set of emitters. By contrast, an arbitrarily chosen input (1, 0, 0, 0, 1) is sent into the coupled waveguide array. As shown in Fig. 2(f), after propagating through a certain distance, acoustic waves are clearly spreading to all channels via the couplinginduced diffraction, with pressure field pattern considerably modified at the output. In this case, the information carried by acoustic waves at the input can hardly be extracted at the output.
For characterizing wave propagations in the coupled waveguide array in details, we extract the waveforms of channels 1, 2, and 3 from the data in Fig. 2(a–f), as plotted by the curves in Fig. 3(a–f). Figure 3(a–e) show the waveforms of different supermodes from z = 30 cm to z = 60 cm at m = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, respectively. For all the supermodes, sound in each air channel bears a stable propagation with the amplitude unchanged. As an example, for the supermode at m = 1 in Fig. 3(a), we clearly see the perfect sinusoidal waveforms in channels 1 (blue dot dash line), 2 (red dashed line), and 3 (black solid line), with the amplitude ratio being and phase locked. In the aforementioned theoretical part, we have shown that the supermode in a coupled waveguide array takes a modulated plane wave form of . Therefore, it is predicted that the modal field will revive at intervals of L_{m} = 2π/β_{m}, viz., supermode wavelength. From Eq. (4), β_{m} becomes smaller as m increases. We will obtain that the higherordered supermode has a longer wavelength. In Figure 3(a–e), the supermode wavelengths are numerically calculated to be L_{1} ≈ 8.10 cm, L_{2} ≈ 8.36 cm, L_{3} ≈ 8.78 cm, L_{4} ≈ 9.54 cm, and L_{5} ≈ 10.33 cm, which agrees well with the theoretical prediction. It should also be mentioned that we can further derive the coupling coefficient between nearest neighbor waveguides C and the selfcoupling coefficient κ_{b} from the calculated supermode wavelengths L_{m}. In our case, we have C ≈ 7.67 × 10^{−2} cm^{−2} and . Figure 3(f) displays the waveform of a normal propagation mode in the coupled channels, featured with constantly changing wave amplitude and phase differences between two arbitrary channels.
To demonstrate the existence of acoustic supermodes experimentally, we have fabricated the sample of waveguide complex with five coupled air channels, and measured the pressure field through perforated holes, as shown in Fig. 1(b). For each air channel, there are 40 holes equally spaced by 2 cm. The details of experimental measurements are presented in the Method section. The measured results are shown by the dots in Fig. 3(a–f), where the blue squares, red circles, and black triangles are the measured data of channels 1, 2, and 3 after normalization. We clearly see that the experimental results are in very good agreement with numerical simulations.
We would also like to point out that the formation of acoustic supermode has nothing to do with frequency, as theoretically unveiled by Eq. (4). To verify this, we simulate the propagation of the 1stordered supermodes at two different frequencies of 4.5 kHz and 5 kHz, respectively, as shown in Fig. 4(a,b). The maps of pressure field distribution display the stable propagation of supermodes, in respect that the output signal is almost the same as the input. From the simulation, we can obtain the supermode wavelengths of the 1stordered supermodes at 4.5 kHz and 5 kHz, viz., and , which shows that the supermode wavelength becomes longer at lower frequencies. In Figure 4(c,d), the experimental results agree with the simulation quite well, with both indicating that the designed waveguide complex can effectively support the acoustic supermode propagation in broadband.
At last, we show that our technique can be applied in the ultrasound regime, which might be useful in highfidelity broadband underwater communication. In the proofofconcept simulation, we employ Steel (mass density ρ = 7.80 × 10^{3} Kg/m^{3}; velocity of longitudinal waves c_{l} = 6100 m/s; velocity of transverse waves c_{t} = 3300 m/s) instead of Aluminum alloy to reduce solidliquid coupling. The operation frequency is chosen to be 1.02 MHz. For the structural parameters scaled by approximately 0.022, the thickness, slit width, and slit period of gratings are t = 0.308 mm, s = 0.11 mm, and p = 0.44 mm, respectively. The width of air channels w = 0.572 mm. We simulate the ultrasound propagation in the coupled waveguide complex in Fig. 5(a–f), where the thermoviscous damping effect and solidliquid coupling are taken into consideration. Even though there exist some field disturbances due to solidliquid interaction, our results still reflect the characteristic propagation of acoustic supermodes, where the field pattern is periodically repeated along z axis.
Discussions
In summary, we have investigated the supermode propagation in coupled acoustic waveguides analytically, numerically, and experimentally. The experimental results agree well with the theoretical prediction and numerical simulation. The proposed device bears the advantages of easy fabrication, small fingerprint, lowloss and broadband performance, as well as the potential to further extend into higher dimensions and the ultrasound regime, which is very promising in various practical applications, such as underwater acoustic communication, ultrasound imaging, and sensing, etc. Our study may pave the way to explore other types of anomalous wave manipulation in integrated acoustic networks.
Methods
Numerical simulation
Throughout this paper, we consider the thermoviscous damping in all numerical simulations by employing thermoacoustics module of COMSOL Multiphysics^{TM} 5.2. A perfectly matched layer is added at the right side to prevent reflections. In the ultrasound simulation, the solidfluid interaction is also take into consideration.
Experimental measurement
In the experiment, we employ a multifunction waveform generator (RIGOL DG1032Z) and a stable power amplifier (AOSIBAO A8 HIFI) to output multiple locked sinusoidal electrical signals, and then use a connected fullrange driver (HiVi B1S) to convert the electrical signals into sound. The pressure field is measured by a 1/8inch diameter Brüel&Kjær TypeLANXI3160 condenser microphone. All data are recorded and processed with Brüel&Kjær PULSE 3160A042 4channel analyser. During the field measurement, other unmeasured holes are plugged with screws to prevent sound leakage.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Shen, Y.X. et al. Observation of lowloss broadband supermode propagation in coupled acoustic waveguide complex. Sci. Rep. 7, 45603; doi: 10.1038/srep45603 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
 1
Zhang, X. D. & Liu, Z. Y. Negative refraction of acoustic waves in twodimensional phononic crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 341 (2004).
 2
Ke, M. Z., Liu, Z. Y., Qiu, C. Y., Wang, W. G. & Shi, J. Negativerefraction imaging with twodimensional phononic crystals. Phys. Rev. B 72, 064306 (2005).
 3
Feng, L. et al. Acoustic BackwardWave Negative Refractions in the Second Band of a Sonic Crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 014301 (2006).
 4
Kaina, N., Lemoult, F., Fink, M. & Lerosey, G. Negative refractive index and acoustic superlens from multiple scattering in single negative metamaterials. Nature 525, 77 (2015).
 5
Zhao, D. G., Ye, Y. T., Xu, S. J., Zhu, X. F. & Yi, L. Broadband and wideangle negative reflection at a phononic crystal boundary. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 043503 (2014).
 6
Christensen, J., FernandezDominguez, A. I., LeonPerez, F. D., MartinMoreno, L. & GarciaVida, F. J. Collimation of sound assisted by acoustic surface waves. Nat. Phys. 3, 851 (2007).
 7
He, Z. J. et al. Acoustic collimating beams by negative refraction in twodimensional phononic crystal. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 116105 (2009).
 8
Shi, J. J., Lin, S. S. & Huang, T. J. Wideband acoustic collimating by phononic crystal composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 111901 (2008).
 9
Jia, H. et al. Subwavelength imaging by a simple planar acoustic superlens. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 173507 (2010).
 10
Li, J., Fok, L., Yin, X. B., Bartal, G. & Zhang, X. Experimental demonstration of an acoustic magnifying hyperlens. Nat. Mater. 8, 931 (2009).
 11
Zhu, J. et al. A holeystructured metamaterial for acoustic deepsubwavelength imaging. Nat. Phys. 7, 52 (2011).
 12
Chen, H. Y. & Chan, C. T. Acoustic cloaking in three dimensions using acoustic metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 183518 (2007).
 13
Zhang, S., Xia, C. G. & Fang, N. Broadband Acoustic Cloak for Ultrasound Waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 024301 (2011).
 14
Zhu, X. F., Liang, B., Kan, W. W., Zou, X. Y. & Cheng, J. C. Acoustic Cloaking by a Superlens with SingleNegative Materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 014301 (2011).
 15
Zhu, X. F., Ramezani, H., Shi, C. Z., Zhu, J. & Zhang, X. PTSymmetric Acoustics. Phys. Rev. X 4, 031042 (2014).
 16
Li, Y., Liang, B., Gu, Z. M., Zou, X. Y. & Cheng, J. C. Unidirectional acoustic transmission through a prism with nearzero refractive index. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 053505 (2013).
 17
Zhu, J. et al. Acoustic rainbow trapping. Sci. Rep. 3, 1728 (2013).
 18
Jia, H., Lu, M. H., Ni, X., Bao, M. & Li, X. D. Spatial separation of spoof surface acoustic waves on the graded groove grating. J. Appl. Phys. 116, 124504 (2014).
 19
Chen, Y. Y., Liu, H. J., Reilly, M., Bae, H. & Yu, M. Enhanced acoustic sensing through wave compression and pressure amplification in anisotropic metamaterials. Nat. Commun. 5, 5247 (2015).
 20
Li, Y. et al. Experimental realization of full control of reflected waves with subwavelength acoustic metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2, 064002 (2014).
 21
Li, Y., Jiang, X., Liang, B., Cheng, J. C. & Zhang, L. K. Metascreenbased acoustic passive phased array. Phys. Rev. Appl. 4, 024003 (2015).
 22
Zhu, X. F. et al. Implementation of dispersionfree slow acoustic wave propagation and phase engineering with helicalstructured metamaterials. Nat. Commun. 7, 11731 (2016).
 23
Yang, Z. J. et al. Topological acoustics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 114301 (2015).
 24
Khanikaev, A. B., Fleury, R., Mousavi, S. H. & Alù, A. Topologically robust sound propagation in an angularmomentumbiased graphenelike resonator lattice. Nat. Commun. 6, 8240 (2015).
 25
Fleury, R., Khanikaev, A. B. & Alù, A. Floquet topological insulators for sound. Nat. Commun. 7, 11744 (2016).
 26
He, C. et al. Acoustic topological insulator and robust oneway sound transport. Nat. Phys. 12, 1124 (2016).
 27
Peng, Y. G. et al. Experimental demonstration of anomalous Floquet topological insulator for sound. Nat. Commun. 7, 13368 (2016).
 28
Lu, J. Y. et al. Observation of topological valley transport of sound in sonic crystals. Nat. Phys., doi: 10.1038/NPHYS3999 (2016).
 29
Ma, G. C. & Sheng, P. Acoustic metamaterials: From local resonances to broad horizons. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501595 (2016).
 30
Cummer, S. A., Christensen, J. & Alù, A. Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16001 (2016).
 31
Hardy, A. & Streifer, W. Coupledmode theory of parallel waveguides. J. Lightwave Technol. LT3, 1135 (1985).
 32
Cooper, M. L. & Mookherjea, S. Numericallyassisted coupledmode theory for silicon waveguide couplers and arrayed waveguides. Opt. Express 17, 1583 (2009).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11674119, 11690030, 11690032, 11404125). X. F. Z. acknowledges the financial support from the Bird Nest Plan of HUST.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
Y.X.S. and Y.G.P. carried out the numerical simulations and theoretical analysis. Y.X.S. and X.C.C. fabricated the sample and did the experiments. X.F.Z., Y.X.S., D.G.Z. and Y.G.P. contributed in the discussion of theoretical analysis and wrote the paper. X.F.Z. conceived and supervised the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, Y., Peng, Y., Chen, X. et al. Observation of lowloss broadband supermode propagation in coupled acoustic waveguide complex. Sci Rep 7, 45603 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45603
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

OneWay Localized Adiabatic Passage in an Acoustic System
Physical Review Letters (2019)

Focusing phenomenon based on the coupling effect of acoustic waveguide
Ultrasonics (2018)

Membranetype smart metamaterials for multimodal sound insulation
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2018)

Topologically protected bound states in onedimensional Floquet acoustic waveguide systems
Journal of Applied Physics (2018)

Simultaneous multiband valleyprotected topological edge states of shear vertical wave in twodimensional phononic crystals with veins
Scientific Reports (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.