DNA damage induced by Strontium-90 exposure at low concentrations in mesenchymal stromal cells: the functional consequences

Musilli, S.; Nicolas, N.; El Ali, Z.; Orellana-Moreno, P.; Grand, C.; Tack, K.; Kerdine-Römer, S.; Bertho, J. M.

doi:10.1038/srep41580

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 30 January 2017

DNA damage induced by Strontium-90 exposure at low concentrations in mesenchymal stromal cells: the functional consequences

S. Musilli¹,
N. Nicolas¹,
Z. El Ali²,
P. Orellana-Moreno¹,
C. Grand¹,
K. Tack¹,
S. Kerdine-Römer² &
…
J. M. Bertho¹

Scientific Reports volume 7, Article number: 41580 (2017) Cite this article

2615 Accesses
15 Citations
4 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

⁹⁰Sr is one of the radionuclides released after nuclear accidents that can significantly impact human health in the long term. ⁹⁰Sr accumulates mostly in the bones of exposed populations. Previous research has shown that exposure induces changes in bone physiology both in humans and in mice. We hypothesize that, due to its close location with bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), ⁹⁰Sr could induce functional damage to stromal cells that may explain these biological effects due to chronic exposure to ⁹⁰Sr. The aim of this work was to verify this hypothesis through the use of an in vitro model of MS5 stromal cell lines exposed to 1 and 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr. Results indicated that a 30-minute exposure to ⁹⁰Sr induced double strand breaks in DNA, followed by DNA repair, senescence and differentiation. After 7 days of exposure, MS5 cells showed a decreased ability to proliferate, changes in cytokine expression, and changes in their ability to support hematopoietic progenitor proliferation and differentiation. These results demonstrate that chronic exposure to a low concentration of ⁹⁰Sr can induce functional changes in BMSCs that in turn may explain the health effects observed in following chronic ⁹⁰Sr exposure.

Human skeletal muscle aging atlas

Article Open access 15 April 2024

Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities

Article 31 March 2023

A single-cell atlas enables mapping of homeostatic cellular shifts in the adult human breast

Article Open access 28 March 2024

Introduction

Strontium-90 (⁹⁰Sr) is a bone- and teeth-seeking radionuclide¹ that is released in large quantities during nuclear accidents and aerial nuclear testing^2,3,4. Due to its high solubility in water and long half-life (29 years), this radionuclide persists in the environment for a long time and progressively enters the food chain. As a consequence, some human populations are exposed to ⁹⁰Sr through ingestion over the long term. For instance, the Techa River was heavily contaminated during the 1950 s, resulting in the exposure of people living by the riverside⁵. Studies on the Techa River cohort demonstrated that some patients presented symptoms of chronic radiation syndrome (CRS) with a suppression of hematopoiesis and immune defense^6,7. A decreased bone remodeling rate was also observed in this population⁸. In addition, we demonstrated an increased bone resorption⁹ and a reduced immune response to a vaccine challenge¹⁰ in mice exposed to ⁹⁰Sr through ingestion for 20 weeks. However, the mechanisms underlying these health effects remain unclear.

Stable strontium is considered as a low toxicity element with a non-observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) in mice of between 40 and 500 mg/kg bw/day according to the physiological system studied¹¹. In addition, in vitro models of strontium activity on osteoblasts showed no effects caused by this element at concentrations less than 1 × 10⁻³ M¹² or l ×10⁵ M¹³ depending on the model. We thus hypothesize that the potential effect due to ⁹⁰Sr might be linked to irradiation due to its disintegration. In line with this hypothesis, the β rays emitted by ⁹⁰Sr are of high energy (0.54 and 2.26 MeV), with a mean penetration range of 150–200 μm in living tissue. As a consequence, the energy of ionizing radiations is deposited in small volumes around the bone tissue, and especially in the endosteum and in cells lining the bone tissue, i.e. bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs)¹⁴. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), key partners of the HSC niche, are known to play a central role in the maintenance of HSC stemness and have been demonstrated to support hematopoiesis¹⁵ through the expression of numerous growth factors and adhesion molecules¹⁶. MSCs can also differentiate into several lineages including adipocytic and osteoblastic lineages, which also play a role in bone physiology¹⁷.

In order to verify this hypothesis, we modeled such an exposure through the use of BMSC and MS5 cell lines cultured in the presence of 1 or 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr. The lowest concentration used was close to the one found in mice bones after 24 weeks of chronic ⁹⁰Sr ingestion¹, taking into account the geometric analogy between the bone and bone marrow tissues. This model was then used to assess functional damage induced by ⁹⁰Sr in BMSCs. We showed in this model that ⁹⁰Sr at low concentrations is able to induce DNA damage, senescence and differentiation in stromal cells, which in turn induces phenotypic and functional changes.

Results

⁹⁰SrCl₂ exposure at low concentration induces double strand-breaks (DSB) in BMSCs

Immunostaining of γ-H2AX foci in rat BMSCs was carried out in order to assess if ⁹⁰Sr exposure at low concentrations is able to induce DSB in cell DNA¹⁸. Flow cytometry analysis of rat BMSCs showed that cells were 82.2 ± 9.2% CD73⁺ CD90⁺ and 79.6 ± 10.4% CD29⁺, a feature of rat mesenchymal stromal cells¹⁹. It is well known that cells form DSB during the S-phase due to the replicative forks. In fact, the frequency of DSB in log phase cell cultures showed a high background of γ-H2AX foci, making it impossible to detect a potential increase in DSB due to ⁹⁰Sr exposure (data not shown). Consequently, all of our experiments were performed after cells reached confluence in order to limit such an effect. ⁹⁰Sr exposure induced a significant increase in the frequency of γ-H2AX foci per nucleus just 30 minutes post-exposure to 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr but not to 1 kBq.mL⁻¹ (Fig. 1a, 5.98 ± 1.17 foci per nucleus in control cells and 13.82 ± 2.49 foci per nucleus in 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ exposed cells, Student’s t-test, p = 0.012). By comparison, a 1 Gy external exposure with gamma rays induced the appearance of 23.6 ± 0.7 γ-H2AX foci per cell. Thus, the exposure of MSCs to ⁹⁰Sr induced a two-fold smaller increase in γ-H2AX foci compared to the induction of γ-H2AX foci by 1 Gy external exposure. However, the background level of γ-H2AX foci was high in these cells, probably due to a large heterogeneity in cell cycle status of these primary BMSC cultures. To confirm these results, the MS5 cell line was used throughout the present study. Similarly, the results showed a significant higher number of γ-H2AX foci per nucleus in MS5 cells after 30 minutes of exposure to 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr as compared to the negative control (Fig. 1b and c, 5.84 ± 0.38 and 3.69 ± 0.29 foci per nucleus respectively, one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). By contrast, no changes were observed with 1 kBq.mL⁻¹. As compared to the external exposure to 1 Gy of gamma rays, exposure of MS5 cells to 10 KBq.ml⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr induced a 10% increase in DSB. Additionally, a rapid decrease in the number of γ -H2AX foci per nucleus was seen after 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days of contamination, returning to control levels. These kinetics are similar to those obtained after 1 Gy of external γ-irradiation used as a positive control in both BMSCs and MS5 (grey bars in Fig. 1a and c), and suggest that DNA damage is rapidly induced by exposure to ⁹⁰Sr, but that DNA repair mechanisms are also rapidly activated.

**Figure 1: ⁹⁰Sr-induced double-strand breaks and DNA repair.**

The level of proteins involved in the DNA repair pathway (Mre11, Ku70 and Rad51) was thus analyzed after 1 hour, 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days of exposure to ⁹⁰Sr (Fig. 1d). In control cells these proteins are already highly expressed. The quantification of bands (data not shown) indicated that there was a slight increase for Ku70, Mre11 and Rad51 protein expression in exposed groups after 1 hour. After 7 days of contamination, this expression returned to basal level. These results suggested that MS5 cells are able to repair the double strand breaks induced by the ⁹⁰Sr contamination, with a similar kinetics as with DSB induced by external irradiation.

Redox status of MS5 cells is not affected by ⁹⁰SrCl₂ exposure

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production is known to be one of the earliest consequences of ionizing radiation and can contribute to DSB formation^20,21. The ability of ⁹⁰Sr to induce oxidative stress in MS5 cells was thus evaluated. First, the general ROS production was measured using a fluorescent reporter probe, H2DCFDA. tBHP as an H₂O₂ provider was used as a positive control and showed the induction of a high level of oxidative stress in MS5 cells, reaching a peak after only 45 minutes of exposure. By contrast, ⁹⁰Sr exposure did not induce a significant increase in oxidative stress regardless of ⁹⁰Sr concentration and the time point (Fig. 2a). When focusing on the gene expression of the main enzymes involved in the antioxidant system such as catalase (Cat), manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), glutathione-S-transferase (Gst), glutathione peroxidase (Gpx), and glutathione reductase (Gsr) between 1 hour and 7 days of ⁹⁰Sr contamination, no significant modification in the transcription of these genes was observed between groups (Fig. 2b). This indicates that, at these concentrations, ⁹⁰Sr is not able to induce a significant increase in the redox status level which could affect MS5 cells. This is consistent with the direct proportionality of oxidative stress induction with energy deposition by ionizing radiation and with the low dose rate in our experiments, calculated at 6.5 mGy.h⁻¹ (A. Desbrée, personal communication).

**Figure 2: Oxidative stress is not induced by ⁹⁰Sr exposure.**

⁹⁰SrCl₂ exposure induces senescence in MS5 cells

A possible consequence of DNA damage and repair is senescence, as previously described after low-dose irradiation^22,23. The senescent status of MS5 cells was first assessed by studying p21 gene expression (Fig. 3a), a well-known marker of cellular senescence²⁴. A significant increase in relative p21 expression compared to the negative control was seen in MS5 cells after 6 hours of treatment with 2 μM doxorubicin as a positive control (5.71 ± 0.53 fold increase compared to the control, Student’s t-test, p < 0.001, data not shown). A similar but lower pattern is observed in MS5 cells exposed for one week to 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr (1.65 ± 0.13 fold increase, one-way ANOVA, p = 0.03) but not with 1 kBq.mL⁻¹ (Fig. 3a). This pattern of senescent cells was confirmed by the immunostaining of p21 after 6 hours of treatment with doxorubicin or after one week of continuous exposure to ⁹⁰Sr, where a dose-dependent increase of the percentage of p21-positive cells was observed (Fig. 3b and c). This increase was significant for the 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ contaminated group compared to the control (Fig. 3c, 10.2 ± 2.7% and 4.46 ± 0.91% of positive cells respectively, Student’s t-test, p = 0.015) but not for the 1 kBq.mL⁻¹ exposure (Fig. 3c). Again, this response was of low amplitude, representing roughly 5% of the increase observed in the positive control. It has previously been shown that the activation of p21 is controlled by p53²⁵. No change in p53 gene expression levels was observed after ⁹⁰Sr exposure (Fig. 3a). However, immunostaining experiments revealed a significant increase in the phosphorylation of p53 after 1 hour of treatment either with 2 μM doxorubicin or with ⁹⁰Sr exposure at 1 and 10 kBq.mL⁻¹, as compared to the negative control (Fig. 3d and e, respectively 85.8 ± 3.47%. 74.7 ± 5.93% and 73.4 ± 5.62% of p53 positive cells, Student’s t-test p < 0.05 and p < 0.001). In order to confirm the increased senescent status of MS5 cells after one week’s exposure to ⁹⁰Sr, cells were tested for senescence-activated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal). Cells positive for SA-β-Gal activity presented a typical morphology of senescent cells, with an enlarged cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig. 3f). In order to obtain a more accurate evaluation of senescence induction, SA-β-Gal positive cells were quantified using 5-dodecanoylaminofluorescein di-b-D galactopyranoside (C₁₂-FDG) as a substrate for SA-β-gal and rotenone as a senescence-inducing positive control²⁶. Results clearly indicated a slight but significant increase in SA-β-Gal positive cells in MS5 cells exposed to 10 KBq.ml⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr, but not in cells exposed to 1 KBq.ml⁻¹, as compared to the negative control (Fig. 3g). Furthermore, a significant increase in mean fluorescence intensity was observed in MS5 cells exposed to 10 KBq.ml⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr, but not in cells exposed to 1 KBq.ml⁻¹, in comparison to the negative control (data not shown). Again, the response of MS5 cells to ⁹⁰Sr was modest, representing 40–50% of the response observed with rotenone. Overall, these results suggested that the highest concentration of ⁹⁰Sr used in this study was able to induce cellular senescence during the 7 days of exposure, through the p53/p21 pathway²⁵.

**Figure 3: Senescence induction in MS5 cells by ⁹⁰Sr exposure.**

⁹⁰SrCl₂ exposure at low concentrations affects cell proliferation but not cell death

Senescence is also defined by an arrest of cell proliferation²⁷. The proliferation ability of MS5 after exposure to ⁹⁰Sr was assessed using the CFU-F assay as originally described²⁸. MS5 cells were exposed to ⁹⁰Sr for one week after they reached confluence and were then tested for their ability to form CFU-F. A decrease in the number of CFU-F after exposure was observed with 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr compared to the control (Fig. 4a, two-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). A slight but non-significant decrease in CFU-F numbers was also observed with 1 kBq.mL⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr. This decrease in CFU-F frequency demonstrated a decreasing proliferation ability of MS5 cells after exposure to ⁹⁰Sr. It should be noted that a similar decrease in CFU-F numbers (although at a lesser magnitude) was observed with MS5 cells exposed to ⁹⁰Sr and tested for CFU-F ability in the log phase of the culture (data not shown).

**Figure 4: ⁹⁰Sr exposure decreases cell proliferation without increasing cell death.**

In order to determine whether the decrease in cell proliferation was due to an increase in cell death, the subG1 fraction of cells was analyzed after ⁹⁰Sr exposure. Results showed no difference in the percentage of MS5 cells in subG1 phase for both ⁹⁰Sr concentrations and for each time point (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, the measurement of LDH activity (used as a marker of cytotoxicity) did not show any difference between exposure groups and the control group (Fig. 4c). This indicated that exposure to ⁹⁰Sr at these concentrations did not induce significant cell death.

Since senescent cells are known to be in a state of proliferative arrest, the impact of ⁹⁰Sr contamination on cell cycle phases by PI staining was tested. The results demonstrated that cells progressed in their cell cycle between 24 hours (not shown) and 7 days of exposure (Fig. 4d), with an increase in the proportion of cells in G0/G1 and this despite ⁹⁰Sr exposure. However, no significant changes in the relative proportion of cells in each phase of the cell cycle were observed regardless of the ⁹⁰Sr concentration and the time point tested. These results suggest that these concentrations of ⁹⁰Sr were not able to induce a significant cell cycle arrest.

MS5 cell differentiation was increased by ⁹⁰SrCl₂ exposure

MS5 cells belong to the mesenchymal lineage but retain the characteristics of pre-adipocytic cells²⁹. This feature was used to determine the impact of ⁹⁰Sr contamination on the spontaneous ability of MS5 cells to differentiate into adipocytes. This was first assessed by histological staining of lipid vesicles (Fig. 5a). The frequency of adipocytic cells revealed a significant higher rate of differentiation after one week’s exposure to both 1 and 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ as compared to control cells (Fig. 5b, 0.305 ± 0.009 and 0.304 ± 0.019 versus 0.213 ± 0.011 respectively, one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). The gene expression of adipogenic markers such as Lpl, Adipoq and Fabp4 was also analyzed after 7 days of exposure to ⁹⁰Sr (Fig. 5c), but no changes in these markers’ expression levels were seen in any group. This is probably due to the high level of expression of these genes due to the pre-adipocyte status of MS5 cells²⁹.

**Figure 5: ⁹⁰Sr exposure induces adipocytic differentiation.**

Sustainment of hematopoietic cell differentiation by MS5 cells after exposure to ⁹⁰SrCl₂

One of the main roles of MSCs is the sustainment of hematopoietic cell proliferation and differentiation. In fact, the MS5 cell line is frequently used as a feeder layer in the long term culture initiating cell (LTC-IC) assay³⁰. In order to define the potential impact of ⁹⁰Sr exposure on MS5 functions, supernatants from MS5 cells exposed to ⁹⁰Sr for one week or from control cultures were used to supplement methylcellulose medium (at a 10% concentration) in a colony forming cell (CFC) assay. As a control medium, supernatant from control cultures of MS5 were supplemented with 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr in order to take into account a possible direct effect of ⁹⁰Sr on bone marrow progenitor proliferation. Results (Fig. 6a) showed a significant increase in CFU-G frequency when bone marrow cells were grown in the presence of supernatant from 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ exposed MS5 cells as compared to a control supernatant (33.4 ± 1.96 CFU-G for 2 × 10⁴ cells and 26.1 ± 1.7 CFU-G for 2 × 10⁴ cells respectively, one-way ANOVA, p = 0.003). A similar significant increase in the frequency of CFU-G but not in the frequency of BFU-E exposed to supernatant from 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr exposed MS5 was observed with a methylcellulose medium supplemented with erythropoietin (33.3 ± 2.2 CFU-G for 2 × 10⁴ cells and 25.5 CFU-G for 2 × 10⁴ cells respectively, one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). By contrast, the use of supernatant from MS5 exposed to 1 kBq.mL⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr, or exposed to control supernatant supplemented with 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ of ⁹⁰Sr, did not induce a change in both CFU-G and BFU-E frequencies (data not shown). This result suggests that the exposure of MS5 cells induced some changes in the cytokine release by these cells. Consequently, we tested the extracellular production of IL-3, IL-6, SCF, GM-CSF and G-CSF, which are some of the main cytokines involved in progenitor proliferation (Fig. 6b). No significant differences in IL-6, SCF and G-CSF release were observed between groups after one week of exposure to ⁹⁰Sr, and the concentrations of IL-3 and GM-CSF in these MS5 supernatants were below the detection limit.

**Figure 6: ⁹⁰Sr exposure modifies cellular functions.**

To go further, the sustainment role of MS5 was investigated through the LTC-IC assay, in which mouse Lin^- bone marrow cells were cultured for 5 weeks in the presence of MS5 cells either previously exposed to ⁹⁰Sr or not, before being tested for their ability to form CFCs^30,31. The frequency of LTC-ICs in control cultures was 88.5 ± 55.6 per 1 × 10⁵ Lin⁻ bone marrow cells and was not significantly affected by the pre-exposure of MS5 cells to ⁹⁰Sr regardless of the concentration used (Fig. 6c).

Cytokine release after ⁹⁰Sr exposure

The previous results suggested that exposure of MS5 cells to ⁹⁰Sr is able to induce some changes to the secreted factors, either quantitatively or qualitatively, but do not seem to have an effect on cell-cell contact, i.e. on the expression of adhesion molecules at the cell surface of MS5 cells. In order to analyze the possible changes in a broader way, the intracellular level of cytokines in MS5 after 7 days of exposure to ⁹⁰Sr was then screened using a protein array (Fig. 7a). The main cytokines identified in the cytoplasm of MS5 cells after 7 days in any exposure group were IL-1ra, M-CSF, MCP-1, TIMP-1 and SDF-1. When measuring these cytokines in the culture supernatant, no significant changes were observed between exposure groups at 72 hours (Fig. 7b). After 7 days of exposure, a slight significant increase in TIMP-1 concentration was observed in the ⁹⁰Sr 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ contaminated cells compared to control (40,680.7 ± 4,059.4 and 33,199.5 ± 1,070.9 pg.mL⁻¹ respectively, Student’s t-test, p = 0.038). No other significant changes were observed despite a tendency IL-1ra concentration and an increase in MCP-1 concentration in the 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ exposed groups. Overall, these results suggest a tendency towards a pro-inflammatory response of MS5 cells to ⁹⁰Sr exposure.

**Figure 7: ⁹⁰Sr exposure and cytokine release.**

Discussion

Stable strontium is considered as a low toxicity element with a no-observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) in mice of between 40 and 500 mg/kg/day depending on the physiological system studied¹¹. In addition, in vitro models tested concentrations of 1 × 10⁻³ M stable SrCl₂ to demonstrate an increase in osteoblastogenesis¹³ and an optimal proliferative stimulation ability of SrCl₂ on BMSCs within a range of 1 × 10⁻³ to 1 × 10⁻⁵ M¹² without any negative effects in these concentration ranges. The concentrated solution of ⁹⁰Sr used in the present study contained 20 μg.ml⁻¹ of non-radioactive ⁸⁸Sr as a carrier. For the 10 kBq.ml⁻¹ activity, the final concentration in the ⁸⁸Sr culture medium was 2.37 × 10⁻⁹ M, corresponding to approximately 1 × 10⁻⁴ fold below the concentrations showing an ability to activate osteoblasts in in vitro culture models. As a consequence, we did not use a control with stable ⁸⁸Sr, assuming that the observed effects were solely due to ⁹⁰Sr disintegration and the associated β ray emission. In fact, the mean range of β particles from ⁹⁰Sr in living tissues is in the range of 150–200 μm, and therefore ⁹⁰Sr that accumulates in bone tissue may irradiate the cells closest to the bone tissue. Our work then focused on the induction of DSB and oxidative stress as the primary effects of ionizing radiation on cells lining the bone tissue, i.e. the mesenchymal stromal cells. Results demonstrated that one of the first effects of ⁹⁰Sr exposure, even at low concentrations (1 and 10 kBq.mL⁻¹), was the induction of DNA DSB after only 30 minutes of exposure in either primary MSCs or MS5 cell lines.

This peak of γ-H2AX foci was followed by a decrease of γ-H2AX foci frequency down to control values at 24 hours, strongly suggesting the activation of DNA repair mechanisms. This rapid kinetic is similar to that observed in our experiments with external gamma-irradiation at 1 Gy used as positive control, and conforms with other studies focused on external radiation at higher doses³² and with a dose-dependent level of DSB induction³³. The decrease in DSB frequency at 24 hours indicates that the DNA repair process was activated with a similar kinetic as that seen with external irradiation^34,35. This agrees with how the activation of DNA repair mechanisms is independent from the nature of the DNA damaging agent. This rapid repair was confirmed by the increased expression of Rad51, Mre11 and Ku70 at 1 and 24 hours, suggesting implication of both the homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) DNA repair pathways. This rapid DNA repair process was surprising, since the level of exposure and the frequency of DSB were very low, even for the highest ⁹⁰Sr concentration. In fact, the dose rate was estimated to be 6.5 mGy.h⁻¹ for the highest ⁹⁰Sr concentration (A. Desbrée, personal communication). However, our results also indicated that the basal level of Ku70, Mre11 and Rad51 proteins was high even in untreated cells, suggesting that in this model cells did not completely reach confluence and were proliferating during exposure. In fact, the appearance of DSB with the progression of replicative forks is a normal physiological mechanism during cell replication, and DNA repair mechanisms are activated during cell division³⁶. This may explain the rapid DNA repair seen in our model. However, we did not look at the size of foci at the end of the exposure period, which could have helped to distinguish between persistent foci or foci caused by the constant repair of basal level DSB. In fact, it was shown³⁷ that, after external irradiation, the frequency of γ-H2AX foci may return to control levels but with an increased focus size. These enlarged foci are considered as persistent foci with complex DNA damage. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that in our model the continuous exposure to β ray irradiation might induce persistent foci, with in turn might be responsible for the observed functional changes. At the end of the 7-day exposure period, the level of repair proteins dropped to the basal level. This suggested that a low-dose ⁹⁰Sr exposure is able to induce enough DNA damage to cause the initial activation of DNA repair mechanisms by the MS5, but the basal level of expression for repair proteins is sufficient to manage DSB repair in the long term, thus explaining the rapid disappearance of DSB according to the duration of exposure in our model. Moreover, the simultaneous expression of both Mre11 and Ku70 suggests that, in our model, both HR and NHEJ repair pathways are activated, probably according to the individual cell cycle status and complexation state of chromatin³⁸. In general, the rapid repair of DSB during ⁹⁰Sr exposure may contribute to the radiation resistance of MSCs.

One of the mechanisms associated with ionizing radiation is the increase in oxidative stress^20,21. Surprisingly, exposure to ⁹⁰Sr did not induce ROS production. This was confirmed by the stable expression of genes encoding for the main enzymes of the antioxidative system, such as Cat, MnSOD, Gpx, Gst and Gsr. The enzymatic activity of these enzymes was not tested given the absence of ROS as detected by the H2DCFDA probe. This absence of detectable ROS production is somewhat contradictory with other studies that show increased oxidative stress levels after ionizing radiation³⁹, but most of these studies were performed with high doses of irradiation. Moreover, since in vivo BMSCs are in a hypoxic environment within the niche⁴⁰, they have a high basal level of anti-oxidative enzymes⁴¹, which may explain the absence of observed oxidative stress in our model.

One possible consequence of ⁹⁰Sr-induced DNA damage is senescence. Increased expression of genes encoding for p21 and an increased percentage of cells expressing the protein after 7 days of exposure to ⁹⁰Sr were observed, along with an increase of p53 phosphorylation, a classical upstream regulator of p2^42,43, after 1 hour of contamination. Moreover, the senescent profile of cells is supported by the increase of SA-β-gal activity in cells exposed to ⁹⁰Sr for 7 days. In addition, the induction of senescence by ionizing radiation is known to be a protective mechanism to escape proliferation^22,23. In accordance with this, a significant decrease in cell proliferation was observed in the CFU-F assay after ⁹⁰Sr exposure, although no cell cycle arrest was observed. This result could be due to the non-synchronized proliferation of MS5 cells, thus diluting the signal. It should be noted that the proliferative ability of MS5 cells was also tested using cultures exposed to ⁹⁰Sr during the log phase. The results (not shown) showed a similar decrease in the frequency of CFU-F after exposure to ⁹⁰Sr. This suggests that the induction of senescence is independent of the cell cycle status of the MS5 cells. Senescence is also known to be an alternative mechanism to escape cell death through apoptosis^44,45,46. As such, neither cell death nor apoptosis were observed after ⁹⁰Sr exposure in MS5 cells. Similar results were obtained after irradiation of human MSCs up to 20 Gy⁴⁷, thus confirming the radiation resistance of MSCs and the induction of senescence as a protective mechanism.

However, the main point in our study is the demonstration that exposing MS5 cells to ⁹⁰Sr induces several functional changes in BMSCs. One of these changes is the increase in the spontaneous adipocytic differentiation of MS5 cells. MS5 is a pre-adipocytic cell line^29,30 that is no longer able to differentiate towards chondrocytic and osteoblastic lineages. This result appears to contradict other studies showing that radiation-induced senescence is associated with a reduced differentiating ability of bone marrow derived MSCs⁴⁸. On the other hand, a recent study showed an increased differentiation of MSCs toward the adipogenic lineage, in association with a radiation-induced senescent phenotype⁴⁹. A possible explanation for this is the inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway which is involved in maintaining stem cells in a self-renewing state⁵⁰. This inhibition could take place by activating PPARγ, a major marker of adipocytic differentiation⁵¹ that is highly expressed in MS5 cells (data not shown).

Another functional change observed in MS5 cell cultures during ⁹⁰Sr exposure was the change in cytokine expression and the resulting change in sustainment of hematopoietic cell regulation. In fact, the increased proliferation of CFU-G strongly suggested a change in cytokine profile of the ⁹⁰Sr-exposed MS5 cells. Although concentrations of the main cytokines implicated in CFC formation (namely SCF, IL-3, IL-6, G-CSF and GM-CSF) were not modified by ⁹⁰Sr exposure, we cannot exclude that the expression of other cytokines implicated in hematopoietic regulation (Flt3-ligand for instance)⁵² could be modified. Accordingly, the extracellular level of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1ra)⁵³ and pro-inflammatory cytokines (MCP-1 and TIMP-1)^54,55 changed slightly after 7 days of exposure to ⁹⁰Sr in a way to promote a pro-inflammatory environment by the MS5. This is consistent with the secretory phenotype of senescent cells (senescence associated secretory phenotype, SASP) that present an increased level toward pro-inflammatory cytokines⁵⁶. Nevertheless, these functional changes in MS5 cells remain limited and did not induce changes in LTC-IC proliferation and differentiation. This suggests that the regulation of early HSCs is not modified by ⁹⁰Sr exposure of stromal cells and can also be confirmed by the analysis of SDF-1 concentration. In fact, SDF-1 is strongly involved in the regulation of HSCs⁵⁷ and does not seem to be affected by the exposure to ⁹⁰Sr. This is in accordance with our previous results showing that an in vivo chronic exposure to ⁹⁰Sr through ingestion did not induce significant changes in hematopoiesis, although bone physiology was affected⁵⁸.

This in vitro study demonstrated for the first time that chronic ⁹⁰Sr exposure at low concentrations is able to induce DNA damage in stromal cells that in turn induce phenotypic and functional changes in these stromal cells, including senescence, differentiation towards the adipocytic lineage, and changes in their ability to support hematopoietic progenitor proliferation. Interestingly, the dosimetric evaluation in our model indicated a dose rate of 6.5 mGy.h⁻¹, i.e. 0.3% (after 30 minutes’ exposure) of the 1 Gy external radiation dose used as a positive control. However, ⁹⁰Sr exposure induced a level of DSB close to 10% of the number of DSBs induced by the 1 Gy external exposure. Similar observations were also made for p53 phosphorylation, p21 expression and SA-β-Gal expression, while positive controls used in this study clearly demonstrated that the cellular response of MS5 cells to external irradiation was in the normal range compared to other in vitro models. This suggests that continuous exposure to ⁹⁰Sr might induce a higher level of cellular damage. This hypothesis may explain the unexpected amplitude of the observed effects compared to the positive controls. These observed effects remains limited in range but such changes in ⁹⁰Sr-exposed BMSCs accumulated in bone tissue may explain some of the previously observed health effects of chronic ⁹⁰Sr ingestion. In fact, we previously observed a change in bone physiology towards bone resorption⁹ and a modification in immune response that could be linked to B cell differentiation in the bone marrow¹⁰. Additionally, studies in humans suggested decreased hematopoiesis and an altered immune status after internal contamination with ⁹⁰Sr together with a decreased bone remodeling rate^7,8. It is now necessary to verify that chronic ⁹⁰Sr exposure induces similar changes in BMSCs in vivo.

Methods

Animals and cell culture

Eight-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats and Balb/c mice were purchased from Charles Rivers Laboratories (L’arbresles, France). They received commercial rodent chow and tap water ad libitum. The animals were kept at constant room temperature (22 ± 2 °C) with a 12-hour daylight cycle. Mice and rats were anesthetized by injection of a mix of ketamine and xylazine or isoflurane respectively, and blood was harvested by intracardiac puncture. Femurs were then harvested in Modified Eagle’s Medium-α (MEM-α) supplemented with 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PS), 1% L-glutamine and 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (all from Invitrogen, Le Pont-de-Claix, France) for subsequent use. All experimental procedures were approved by the animal care committee of the Institut de Radioprotection et de S û reté Nucléaire (IRSN) and conformed to French regulations (Ministry of Agriculture Act No. 87-848, 19 October 1987, modified 29 May 2001).

Rat femurs were flushed using MEM-α supplemented with 10% FBS. After washing and numeration in the presence of acetic acid, bone marrow cells were seeded at 500,000 cells.cm⁻². 24 hours later, non-adherent cells were washed out and adherent cells were cultured with medium change twice a week until confluence. Rat bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) were then used for subsequent experiments in passage 1 or 2. MS5, a murine pre-adipocytic stromal cell line²⁹, was cultured in MEM-α supplemented with 1% PS, 1% L-glutamine and 10% FBS. Cells were seeded at a concentration of 5,000 cells.cm⁻² into 75 cm² flasks and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO₂. The medium was changed twice a week until cells reached confluence. Cells were then washed twice with 1x Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS, Invitrogen) and detached by incubation for 5 minutes at 37 °C with Trypsin-EDTA (Invitrogen). Cells were then harvested, washed twice, counted, and viability assessed by trypan blue exclusion. When indicated, cultures of rat BMSCs or MS5 cells were exposed by adding ⁹⁰SrCl₂ (CERCA-LEA, Pierrelatte, France) to the culture medium at a final concentration of 1 and 10 kBq.mL⁻¹. When required, positive controls were performed and cells were treated either with doxorubicin (2 μM final concentration), rotenone (0.1 μM final concentration, both from Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Quentin Fallavier, France) or γ-irradiated with a ¹³⁷Cs source (0.5 Gy. minute⁻¹, IBL, CisBio, Saclay, France).

CFU-F assay

CFU-F assay was performed as originally described²⁸. In summary, cells were seeded into a 25 cm² flask at low concentrations (20, 50, 100 and 200 cells/flask) in triplicate. After 2 weeks of culture at 37 °C and 5% CO₂, the medium was removed and the cells were washed twice with 1x PBS and fixed 5 minutes with methanol. Cultures were then stained with May-Grünwald Giemsa solutions. Colonies of at least 50 cells were then counted.

Histological staining

At the end of the exposure period, the medium was removed and frozen at −80 °C for subsequent measurements, and cells were washed twice with 1x PBS. For the staining of adipocytic cells, MS5 cells were fixed 10 minutes at room temperature with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), and then washed and incubated for 10 minutes with 2 mL Oil Red O solution (Sigma-Aldrich) in order to stain lipid vacuoles. Cells were then counterstained for 1 minute with 2 mL Mayer’s hemalun and rinsed with tap water. The number of cells containing lipid vacuoles was then assessed in ten fields per well containing at least 50 nuclei. The SA-β-Gal staining was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions (senescence detection kit, Promokine, Heidelberg, Genrmany).

Immunostaining

For immunostaining of γ-H2AX, after 30 minutes, 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days of exposure to ⁹⁰SrCl₂, cells were washed twice with 1x PBS and fixed for 15 minutes at room temperature with a 4% PFA solution. After washing, cells were incubated with lysing solution for 3 minutes at room temperature then with primary rabbit anti γ-H2AX antibody (Millipore, Guyancourt, France) diluted into 2% PBS-BSA (bovine serum albumin) solution for 40 minutes at 37 °C. After washing, cells were incubated for 20 minutes at 37 °C with anti-rabbit IgG coupled to FITC (Life Technologies). After washing, slides were mounted with Vectashield mounting medium containing DAPI (Life Technologies) for nucleus staining. Images were automatically acquired onto fluorescent microscope connected to the Metafer system (Metasystem, Alltussheim, Germany). At least 250 nuclei were captured and the number of γ-H2AX foci/nuclei was assessed using Histolab software (Microvision Instruments, Evry, France).

For p21 and p53 detection, cells were stained following the same protocol using a rabbit anti-p21 (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Heidelberg, Germany) or a rabbit anti-p53 (R&D Systems, Lille, France) and a secondary anti-rabbit IgG coupled to FITC (Life Technologies). Images were acquired on a fluorescent microscope using Histolab software (Microvision Instruments).

Flow cytometry

Cell cycle analysis was carried out using propidium iodine (PI) staining. In short, after exposure to ⁹⁰SrCl₂, cells were detached by trypsin incubation, washed twice and counted. 300,000 cells were fixed in 70% ethanol and stored at −20 °C for at least one hour. Cells were then centrifuged 8 minutes at 400 g and the pellet was re-suspended with a sodium citrate solution containing 0.2% Triton X-100, 100 μg.mL⁻¹ RNAse and 50 μg.mL⁻¹ PI (Sigma) and incubated 30 minutes at 37 °C in the dark. Stained cells were then analyzed on a FACS Canto II (BDIS, Le Pont-de-Claix, France) with the acquisition of at least 10,000 events per condition.

Phenotypic analysis of rat BMSCs was performed using the following directly coupled antibodies: anti-IgG1-FITC, anti-IgG2a-PE, anti-CD44-FITC, anti-CD45-FITC, anti-CD90-PE, anti-CD73-alexa647 (all from BD Pharmingen, Le Pont-de-Claix, France) and anti-CD34-PE (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies). At the first passage, aliquots of 200,000 cells were washed twice in PBS and incubated for 20 minutes in the presence of the indicated antibodies at pre-defined concentrations. Cells were then washed twice and analyzed.

Intracellular ROS measurement

Intracellular ROS production was detected using the specific dye 2′–7′- dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA, Sigma-Aldrich), as previously described⁵⁹. Cells were seeded at 2 × 10⁶ cells.mL⁻¹ and loaded for 30 minutes in the dark with 20 μM H2DCFDA before exposure to ⁹⁰Sr. After incubation, cells were washed with culture medium and treated with ⁹⁰SrCl₂ from 15 minutes up to 1 hour. A treatment with 300 μM terbutyl hydroperoxide (tBHP) was used as a positive control. The green DCF fluorescence was analyzed by flow cytometry using the FL1-H wavelength band on 10,000 cells. The results were expressed using mean fluorescent intensity (MFI).

Senescence associated (SA) β-galactosidase activity measurement

After 7 days of cell culture with ⁹⁰Sr or a senescence inducer (rotenone, 0.1 μM final concentration, Sigma), the medium was removed and replaced by fresh medium containing Bafilomycin A1 at a final concentration of 100 nM (Sigma) and incubated for 1 hour at 37 °C. Cells were then incubated 1 hour at 37 °C with 33 μM 5-Dodeconoylaminofluorescein Di-β-Galactopyranoside (C₁₂FDG, Molecular Probes), as previously described^26,60. At the end of the incubation period, cells were harvested as described above and fluorescence was analyzed with a FACSCanto II, with at least 10,000 events recorded for each experimental condition. Results were expressed as mean fluorescence intensity.

Hematopoietic assays

A colony forming assay was conducted as previously described⁵⁸. In summary, femurs from normal mouse donors were flushed, cells were counted and viability assessed. Cells were then plated at a concentration of 50,000 cells in 1.1 mL of complete methylcellulose medium without cytokines or with erythropoietin (EPO) (both from Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada). The methylcellulose medium was previously supplemented with supernatants from MS5 cells cultured in the presence or absence of ⁹⁰SrCl_2. As a control, supernatant from MS5 cells cultured in the absence of ⁹⁰SrCl₂ was supplemented with 10 kBq.mL⁻¹of ⁹⁰SrCl₂ to take into account a possible direct effect of ⁹⁰SrCl₂ on bone marrow progenitor proliferation. Cultures were then incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO₂ in a humidified atmosphere for 12 days. Colony-forming units-granulocytes (CFU-G) and burst-forming units-erythroid (BFU-E) were scored on day 12 of culture.

Long-term culture initiating-cells (LTC-ICs) were performed using MS5 cell layers as a feeder in 96-well plates as previously described^30,31. At confluence, MS5 cells were exposed for one week to either 1 or 10 kBq.mL⁻¹ of ⁹⁰SrCl₂. Normal mouse bone marrow cells were depleted of mature cells by using lineage (Lin) specific antibody mixture and magnetic beads separation according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Miltenyi Biotec, Paris, France). The control by FACS analysis showed a population composed of 90.2 ± 7.2% Lin⁻ cells, corresponding to an 8-fold enrichment of Lin⁻ bone marrow cells. After washing the culture layer twice to remove ⁹⁰Sr, culture plates were seeded with 5000, 2500, 1250, 625 or 312 Lin⁻ bone marrow cells in complete long term culture medium (Myelocult, Stem Cell Technologies). A half-medium change was carried out weekly for 5 weeks. Cells were then harvested from each well through trypsin digestion of the stromal layer and plated in complete methylcellulose medium with cytokines (Methocult M3434, Stem Cell Technologies). CFCs were counted on day 12 of culture. The number of positive wells, i.e. containing at least one CFC, was defined and the frequency of LTC-ICs was determined through a linear regression between the number of cells seeded per well and the frequency of negative wells for each culture condition tested.

Cytokine measurement

Extracellular production of interleukin-3 (IL-3), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), stem cell factor (SCF), stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) were quantified in MS5 supernatant with ELISA kits according to manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK). Intracellular levels of cytokines were measured by Mouse Cytokine Array (R&D System) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Lactate dehydrogenase measurement

Cytotoxicity of ⁹⁰Sr after one week’s contamination was assessed by extracellular lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) measurement using the Cytotoxicity Detection KitPLUS (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

RT-qPCR

Total mRNA was isolated from cells with the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration and integrity were checked by optical density measurement at 230 nm and by 260/280 nm ratio (Thermo Scientific NanoDrop 1000, Labtech, Palaiseau, France). 1 μg of total mRNA was reverse transcribed using the high capacity cDNA reverse transcriptase kit (Applied Biosystems, Courtaboeuf, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was performed using the Sybr Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and selected primers (see Table 1) for the measurement of gene expression. Amplification and detection of PCR products were performed using Quant Studio^TM 12 K Flex (Life Technologies). The relative expression ratio of each sample was normalized to the geometric mean of the expression level of Gapdh, Ppia and Rpl27 used as housekeeping genes⁶¹.

Table 1 Primers used in this study.

Full size table

Western blot analysis

Total protein was extracted from cell pellets using a lysing kit (Mammalian Cell Lysing Kit, Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein concentration was then defined by bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA, Life Technologies). For each sample, 20 μg of proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (Invitrogen). The membrane was then incubated for 1 hour with 1x PBS supplemented with 5% fat-free milk and 0.2% Tween 20 to block the non-specific binding sites. Protein immunodetection was performed by incubating the membrane overnight at + 4 °C with polyclonal rabbit anti-Rad51, anti-Ku70 (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies) and anti-Mre11 (AbCam). Polyclonal rabbit GAPDH antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies) was used as a loading control. Antibody binding was detected using the corresponding horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-rabbit antibody (AbCam) diluted to 1:5,000 for 1 hour at room temperature and revealed by chemiluminescence on Fujifilm LAS-3000.

Statistical analysis

Unless otherwise indicated, all cultures were made in triplicate, and all experiments were repeated at least three times. Unless otherwise indicated, all the results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were performed with Sigmaplot software (v11.0, Systat, Paris, France). The comparison between groups was assessed by both two and one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons and by Student’s t-test for single comparison as indicated. Differences with a p-value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Musilli, S. et al. DNA damage induced by Strontium-90 exposure at low concentrations in mesenchymal stromal cells: the functional consequences. Sci. Rep. 7, 41580; doi: 10.1038/srep41580 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

Synhaeve, N., Stefani, J., Tourlonias, E., Dublineau, I. & Bertho, J. M. Biokinetics of (90)Sr after chronic ingestion in a juvenile and adult mouse model. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 50, 501–511 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nabeshi, H. et al. Surveillance of Strontium-90 in Foods after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident. Food Hygiene and Safety Science (Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi) 56, 133–143, doi: 10.3358/shokueishi.56.133 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Rantavaara, A. Ingestion doses in Finland due to (90)Sr, (134)Cs, and (137)Cs from nuclear weapons testing and the Chernobyl accident. Appl Radiat Isot 66, 1768–1774, doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2007.12.018 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
de Ruig, W. G. & van der Struijs, T. D. Radioactive contamination of food sampled in the areas of the USSR affected by the Chernobyl disaster. The Analyst 117, 545–548 (1992).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Tolstykh, E. I. et al. Reconstruction of long-lived radionuclide intakes for Techa riverside residents: strontium-90. Health Physics 101, 28–47 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Krestinina, L. Y. et al. Leukaemia incidence in the Techa River Cohort: 1953-2007. British Journal of Cancer 109, 2886–2893, doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.614 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Akleyev, A. V. Chronic radiation syndrome among residents of the Techa riverside villages. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 151, 689–695, doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs183 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tolstykh, E. I., Shagina, N. B., Degteva, M. O., Anspaugh, L. R. & Napier, B. A. Does the cortical bone resorption rate change due to 90Sr-radiation exposure? Analysis of data from Techa Riverside residents. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 50, 417–430, doi: 10.1007/s00411-011-0363-z (2011).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Synhaeve, N. et al. Chronic exposure to low concentrations of strontium 90 affects bone physiology but not the hematopoietic system in mice. Journal of Applied Toxicology: JAT 34, 76–86, doi: 10.1002/jat.2834 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Synhaeve, N. et al. Immune System Modifications Induced in a Mouse Model of Chronic Exposure to (90)Sr. Radiat Res 185, 267–284, doi: 10.1667/RR14014.1 (2016).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
ATSDR. Toxicological profile for strontium. (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry., Atlanta., 2004).
Braux, J. et al. A new insight into the dissociating effect of strontium on bone resorption and formation. Acta biomaterialia 7, 2593–2603, doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.013 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lymperi, S. et al. Strontium can increase some osteoblasts without increasing hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 111, 1173–1181 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mendez-Ferrer, S. et al. Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature 466, 829–834, doi: 10.1038/nature09262 (2010).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Friedenstein, A. J., Chailakhyan, R. K., Latsinik, N. V., Panasyuk, A. F. & Keiliss-Borok, I. V. Stromal cells responsible for transferring the microenvironment of the hemopoietic tissues. Cloning in vitro and retransplantation in vivo . Transplantation 17, 331–340 (1974).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Caplan, A. I. & Dennis, J. E. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 98, 1076–1084, doi: 10.1002/jcb.20886 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pittenger, M. F. et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284, 143–147 (1999).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Rogakou, E. P., Pilch, D. R., Orr, A. H., Ivanova, V. S. & Bonner, W. M. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 5858–5868 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Semont, A. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy stimulates endogenous host progenitor cells to improve colonic epithelial regeneration. PloS one 8, e70170, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070170 (2013).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nikitaki, Z., Hellweg, C. E., Georgakilas, A. G. & Ravanat, J. L. Stress-induced DNA damage biomarkers: applications and limitations. Frontiers in Chemistry 3, 35, doi: 10.3389/fchem.2015.00035 (2015).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Barzilai, A. & Yamamoto, K. DNA damage responses to oxidative stress. DNA Repair 3, 1109–1115, doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.002 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Alessio, N. et al. Low dose radiation induced senescence of human mesenchymal stromal cells and impaired the autophagy process. Oncotarget 6, 8155–8166, doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2692 (2015).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Cmielova, J. et al. Gamma radiation induces senescence in human adult mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and periodontal ligaments. Int J Radiat Biol 88, 393–404, doi: 10.3109/09553002.2012.666001 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Salama, R., Sadaie, M., Hoare, M. & Narita, M. Cellular senescence and its effector programs. Genes & Development 28, 99–114, doi: 10.1101/gad.235184.113 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Vogelstein, B., Lane, D. & Levine, A. J. Surfing the p53 network. Nature 408, 307–310, doi: 10.1038/35042675 (2000).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Debacq-Chainiaux, F., Erusalimsky, J. D., Campisi, J. & Toussaint, O. Protocols to detect senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-[beta]gal) activity, a biomarker of senescent cells in culture and in vivo . Nat. Protocols 4, 1798–1806 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kuilman, T., Michaloglou, C., Mooi, W. J. & Peeper, D. S. The essence of senescence. Genes & Development 24, 2463–2479, doi: 10.1101/gad.1971610 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Castro-Malaspina, H. et al. Characterization of human bone marrow fibroblast colony-forming cells (CFU-F) and their progeny. Blood 56, 289–301 (1980).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Itoh, K. et al. Reproducible establishment of hemopoietic supportive stromal cell lines from murine bone marrow. Exp Hematol 17, 145–153 (1989).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Issaad, C., Croisille, L., Katz, A., Vainchenker, W. & Coulombel, L. A murine stromal cell line allows the proliferation of very primitive human CD34++/CD38- progenitor cells in long-term cultures and semisolid assays. Blood 81, 2916–2924 (1993).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sutherland, H. J., Eaves, C. J., Lansdorp, P. M., Thacker, J. D. & Hogge, D. E. Differential regulation of primitive human hematopoietic cells in long-term cultures maintained on genetically engineered murine stromal cells. Blood 78, 666–672 (1991).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mariotti, L. G. et al. Use of the gamma-H2AX assay to investigate DNA repair dynamics following multiple radiation exposures. PloS One 8, e79541, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079541 (2013).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sugrue, T., Brown, J. A., Lowndes, N. F. & Ceredig, R. Multiple facets of the DNA damage response contribute to the radioresistance of mouse mesenchymal stromal cell lines. Stem Cells 31, 137–145, doi: 10.1002/stem.1222 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kavanagh, J. N., Redmond, K. M., Schettino, G. & Prise, K. M. DNA double strand break repair: a radiation perspective. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 18, 2458–2472, doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.5151 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Thompson, L. H. Recognition, signaling, and repair of DNA double-strand breaks produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: the molecular choreography. Mutation Research 751, 158–246, doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.06.002 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sancar, A., Lindsey-Boltz, L. A., Unsal-Kacmaz, K. & Linn, S. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annual Review of Biochemistry 73, 39–85, doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073723 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bracalente, C. et al. Induction and persistence of large gammaH2AX foci by high linear energy transfer radiation in DNA-dependent protein kinase-deficient cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87, 785–794, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.014 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Goodarzi, A. A., Jeggo, P. & Lobrich, M. The influence of heterochromatin on DNA double strand break repair: Getting the strong, silent type to relax. DNA Repair 9, 1273–1282, doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.013 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hou, J. et al. Autophagy prevents irradiation injury and maintains stemness through decreasing ROS generation in mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Death & Disease 4, e844, doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.338 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Eliasson, P. & Jonsson, J. I. The hematopoietic stem cell niche: low in oxygen but a nice place to be. Journal of Cellular Physiology 222, 17–22, doi: 10.1002/jcp.21908 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Valle-Prieto, A. & Conget, P. A. Human mesenchymal stem cells efficiently manage oxidative stress. Stem Cells Dev 19, 1885–1893, doi: 10.1089/scd.2010.0093 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Day, R. M., Snow, A. L. & Panganiban, R. A. Radiation-induced accelerated senescence: a fate worse than death? Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex 13, 2011–2012, doi: 10.4161/cc.29457 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sperka, T., Wang, J. & Rudolph, K. L. DNA damage checkpoints in stem cells, ageing and cancer. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 13, 579–590, doi: 10.1038/nrm3420 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Childs, B. G., Baker, D. J., Kirkland, J. L., Campisi, J. & van Deursen, J. M. Senescence and apoptosis: dueling or complementary cell fates? EMBO Reports 15, 1139–1153, doi: 10.15252/embr.201439245 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wu, X. et al. Up-regulation of P21 inhibits TRAIL-mediated extrinsic apoptosis, contributing resistance to SAHA in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Cell Physiol Biochem 34, 506–518 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Garner, E. & Raj, K. Protective mechanisms of p53-p21-pRb proteins against DNA damage-induced cell death. Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex 7, 277–282 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chen, M.-F. et al. The sensitivity of human mesenchymal stem cells to ionizing radiation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 66, 244–253, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.062 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mehrara, B. J. et al. p21cip/WAF is a key regulator of long-term radiation damage in mesenchyme-derived tissues. The FASEB Journal 24, 4877–4888, doi: 10.1096/fj.10-155762 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Islam, M. S., Stemig, M. E., Takahashi, Y. & Hui, S. K. Radiation response of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow and human pluripotent stem cells. Journal of Radiation Research 56, 269–277, doi: 10.1093/jrr/rru098 (2015).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nusse, R. Wnt signaling and stem cell control. Cell Research 18, 523–527 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
James, A. W. Review of Signaling Pathways Governing MSC Osteogenic and Adipogenic Differentiation. Scientifica 2013, 17, doi: 10.1155/2013/684736 (2013).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Wodnar-Filipowicz, A. Flt3 ligand: role in control of hematopoietic and immune functions of the bone marrow. News Physiol Sci 18, 247–251 (2003).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Palomo, J., Dietrich, D., Martin, P., Palmer, G. & Gabay, C. The interleukin (IL)-1 cytokine family – Balance between agonists and antagonists in inflammatory diseases. Cytokine 76, 25–37, doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2015.06.017 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Conti, P. & DiGioacchino, M. MCP-1 and RANTES are mediators of acute and chronic inflammation. Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 22, 133–137 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ries, C. Cytokine functions of TIMP-1. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS 71, 659–672, doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1457-3 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Freund, A., Orjalo, A. V., Desprez, P. Y. & Campisi, J. Inflammatory networks during cellular senescence: causes and consequences. Trends in Molecular Medicine 16, 238–246, doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.03.003 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sugiyama, T., Kohara, H., Noda, M. & Nagasawa, T. Maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches. Immunity 25, 977–988, doi: 10.1016/j;immuni;2006.10.016 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bertho, J. M. et al. Biodistribution of (137)Cs in a mouse model of chronic contamination by ingestion and effects on the hematopoietic system. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 49, 239–248 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Royall, J. A. & Ischiropoulos, H. Evaluation of 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin and dihydrorhodamine 123 as fluorescent probes for intracellular H2O2 in cultured endothelial cells. Arch Biochem Biophys 302, 348–355, doi: 10.1006/abbi.1993.1222 (1993).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Noppe, G. et al. Rapid flow cytometric method for measuring senescence associated beta-galactosidase activity in human fibroblasts. Cytometry. Part A: The Journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology 75, 910–916, doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20796 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 29, e45 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the expert animal care of A. Saché and M. Berchet and the invaluable secretarial assistance of V. Joffres and S. Barth. The authors would also like to thank A. Desbrée for the dose rate estimations, C. Demarquay for providing the rat mesenchymal stem cells and helping us with FACS data acquisition, and V. Paget for his help with SA-β-Gal staining. This work was supported by institutional funding from the IRSN (program D3-P8-05-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Institut de radioprotection et de sureté nucléaire (IRSN), PRP-HOM/SRBE/LRTOX, Fontenay aux roses, France
S. Musilli, N. Nicolas, P. Orellana-Moreno, C. Grand, K. Tack & J. M. Bertho
UMR996 - Inflammation, Chemokines and Immunopathology, INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Châtenay-Malabry, 92296, France
Z. El Ali & S. Kerdine-Römer

Authors

S. Musilli
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
N. Nicolas
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Z. El Ali
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
P. Orellana-Moreno
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
C. Grand
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
K. Tack
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
S. Kerdine-Römer
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
J. M. Bertho
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.M., S.K.-R. and J.M.B. designed the study. S.M., N.N., Z.E.A., P. O.-M., C.G., K.T., S.K.-R. and J.M.B. substantially contributed to data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, participated in the drafting, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Bertho.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 (PDF 170 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Musilli, S., Nicolas, N., El Ali, Z. et al. DNA damage induced by Strontium-90 exposure at low concentrations in mesenchymal stromal cells: the functional consequences. Sci Rep 7, 41580 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41580

Download citation

Received: 13 January 2016
Accepted: 09 December 2016
Published: 30 January 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41580

This article is cited by

Binding mechanism of strontium to biopolymer hydrogel composite materials
- Stella Foster
- Nitya Ramanan
- Bhoopesh Mishra
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry (2023)
Assessment of common housekeeping genes as reference for gene expression studies using RT-qPCR in mouse choroid plexus
- Kim Hoa Ho
- Annarita Patrizi
Scientific Reports (2021)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.