Article | Open | Published:

Genomic structural variations for cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidity

Scientific Reports volume 7, Article number: 41268 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify genes targeted by both copy number and copy-neutral changes in the right coronary arteries in the area of advanced atherosclerotic plaques and intact internal mammary arteries derived from the same individuals with comorbid coronary artery disease and metabolic syndrome. The artery samples from 10 patients were screened for genomic imbalances using array comparative genomic hybridization. Ninety high-confidence, identical copy number variations (CNVs) were detected. We also identified eight copy-neutral changes (cn-LOHs) > 1.5 Mb in paired arterial samples in 4 of 10 individuals. The frequencies of the two gains located in the 10q24.31 (ERLIN1) and 12q24.11 (UNG, ACACB) genomic regions were evaluated in 33 paired arteries and blood samples. Two patients contained the gain in 10q24.31 (ERLIN1) and one patient contained the gain in 12q24.11 (UNG, ACACB) that affected only the blood DNA. An additional two patients harboured these CNVs in both the arteries and blood. In conclusion, we discovered and confirmed a gain of the 10q24.31 (ERLIN1) and 12q24.11 (UNG, ACACB) genomic regions in patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic comorbidity. Analysis of DNA extracted from blood indicated a possible somatic origin for these CNVs.

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases and metabolic syndrome are closely interrelated via pathogenesis and considered complex comorbid disorders. Metabolic abnormalities, such as abdominal obesity, high blood pressure, hyperglycaemia, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and elevated triglycerides, are important risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Metabolic syndrome is associated with advanced vascular damage and complicated atherosclerotic lesions in patients with coronary artery disease1.

The role of genetic variability in the pathogenesis of both coronary artery disease and metabolic syndrome has been extensively investigated during recent decades. Genetic polymorphisms identified through candidate gene or genome-wide association studies account for a small part of the heritability of these complex traits. Possible factors that may affect some of the “missing heritability” include structural genomic variants, rare variants, epigenetic mechanisms, gene-gene interactions, and gene-environment interactions2.

The advent of genome-wide high throughput technologies has allowed the characterization of structural genomic variants, such as copy number variants (CNVs), in a single array experiment. Several CNVs explain rare inherited disorders, and other CNV events are thought to be involved in the aetiology and pathogenesis of complex traits and diseases. There is also emerging evidence that somatic genetic changes are more common than previously predicted3,4. For example, somatic gene alterations have been observed in multiple tissues5,6,7. The study of somatic DNA copy number and copy-neutral changes is important for cancer genomics; however, to date, the evidence for their involvement in other diseases remains limited.

The studies of CNVs in coronary artery disease have typically used DNA isolated from peripheral blood, and inconclusive results were obtained8,9,10,11. The most pronounced genomic imbalance in patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic comorbidity are possibly detected in the target disease organs, such as coronary arteries. Plaques potentially develop via a series of somatic mutations, and atherosclerosis has similarities to malignant diseases12. Chromosomal aberrations, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), microsatellite instability (MI), and DNA strand breaks and adducts were detected within human atherosclerotic plaques13,14. However, a comprehensive profile of the DNA differences between atherosusceptible and atheroprotected arterial regions has yet to be developed. Most of these studies have used traditional cytogenetic methods, which have low resolution and require cells that are actively dividing15. Additionally, only selective candidate microsatellite DNA loci were tested for the detection of LOH and MI in the area of atherosclerotic plaques16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23.

We sought to identify the genes targeted by the both copy number and copy-neutral changes in the right coronary arteries in the area of advanced atherosclerotic plaques (CAP) and in intact internal mammary arteries (IMA) derived from the same individuals with coronary artery disease and metabolic syndrome. The study of coronary artery-specific CNV regions of patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic comorbidity may improve our knowledge of comorbidity disease mechanisms.

Results

In our analysis of 10 individuals using the Agilent SurePrint G3 Human CGH + SNP Microarray 2 × 400 K assay, we identified 90 CNVs present in both tissue samples obtained from a single individual (Table S1). The average number of CNVs per individual was 38.4, ranging from 31 to 46. The average CNV size was approximately 217 kb, ranging from 4.4 kb to 2 Mb. Most of the observed CNVs were copy number losses (62%). Fifty-five of 90 (61%) CNVs were present in more than one patient. Of the CNVs identified, 80% overlapped with RefSeq genes. The identified genes are associated with olfactory transduction and metabolic pathways, such as starch and sucrose metabolism, metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450, ascorbate and aldarate metabolism, and pancreatic secretion (Table S2).

Fifteen chromosomal regions contained CNVs that are candidates for genes previously associated with cardiovascular and metabolic disease susceptibility (Table 1). One of the 15 CNVs was not listed in the DGV (accessed on 20.11.2015) and was therefore considered a novel CNV. One patient exhibited amplification in chromosomal region 10q24.31 (ERLIN1; Fig. 1).

Table 1: DNA copy number changes in arteries of patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic comorbidity.
Figure 1: Array comparative genomic hybridization data analysis of patient 10.
Figure 1

DNA of the right coronary artery in the area of advanced atherosclerotic plaque (red line) and DNA of the intact internal mammary artery (green line).

The analysis of array data by both the Agilent Genomic Workbench and DNAcopy programs indicated no high-confidence coronary artery-specific copy number and copy-neutral changes when the DNA from CAP was compared with IMA.

Using the Agilent SurePrint G3 Human CGH + SNP Microarray 2 × 400 K, we also identified 8 copy-neutral changes (cn-LOH) present in both CAP and IMA samples (Table 2). These regions were detected in 4 of 10 individuals, spanning >1.5 Mb, with three changes located in chromosomal regions 7q21.12-q21.13, 11p12, 18q12.1-q12.2 (patient 1), 6q15, 8p11.21-p11.1, 8q11.1-q11.21 (patient 2), and one in 17q23.1-q24.1 (patient 3) and 9p21.2 (patient 7). Using the web-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit, we determined whether the genes located in cn-LOH are enriched for certain KEGG categories. The results indicated that genes fell into six KEGG categories: RIG-I-like receptor signalling pathway, neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, Jak-STAT signalling pathway, Wnt signalling pathway, cell cycle, and ABC transporters (Table S3).

Table 2: DNA copy-neutral changes in arteries of patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic comorbidity.

To validate the initial array-CGH data, we selected two genomic regions, 10q24.31 (ERLIN1) and 12q24.11 (UNG, ACACB), for qPCR analysis. The qPCR assay results were consistent with the array data.

To further validate our results, we evaluated the frequency of these CNVs in the DNA of 33 paired arteries and the blood of men with coronary artery disease and metabolic comorbidity. One patient exhibited increased gene copy numbers in 10q24.31 (ERLIN1) in all of his studied tissues (Fig. 2). Amplification of the same chromosomal region was also observed in the blood-derived DNA but was not present in the arteries-derived DNA (CAP and IMA) of two persons. Another patient contained the gain in region 12q24.11 (UNG, ACACB) in both the arteries (CAP and IMA) and blood (Fig. 3). One patient contained the gain in 12q24.11 (UNG, ACACB) that affected only the blood DNA.

Figure 2: Real-time qPCR result of the CNV region on 10q24.31 in ERLIN1.
Figure 2

Abbreviations: AEM - Human Reference DNA-Male with Caucasian ethnicity (5190-3796, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA); CAP - right coronary artery in the area of advanced atherosclerotic plaque; IMA - intact internal mammary artery; qPCR - quantitative PCR.

Figure 3: Real-time qPCR result of the CNV region on 12q24.11 in UNG and ACACB.
Figure 3

Abbreviations: AEM - Human Reference DNA-Male with Caucasian ethnicity (5190-3796, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA); CAP - right coronary artery in the area of advanced atherosclerotic plaque; IMA - intact internal mammary artery; qPCR - quantitative PCR.

Discussion

Comprehensive knowledge of the genomic alteration events in cardiovascular diseases is critical for improved diagnostics and for developing targeted therapeutics. CNVs are a significant source of genetic diversity, but their influence on disease susceptibility remains poorly understood. For cardiovascular disease, several studies on CNVs in myocardial infarction and hyperlipidaemia patients have been reported10; however, there has been no CNV research for coronary artery disease and metabolic comorbidity. In the present study, we compared the genomic DNA in the CAP and IMA from patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic comorbidity using array-CGH. We used the Agilent SurePrint G3 Human CGH + SNP Microarray 2 × 400 K that allows for the simultaneous detection of copy number and copy-neutral changes on the same array across the entire genome.

Examination of the DNA in the arterial samples of 10 patients indicated the presence of 15 loci with CNVs that are candidates for genes previously associated with cardiovascular and metabolic disease susceptibility (Table 1). Most of these CNVs are reported recurrently in the DGV and are also present in the array-CGH database at the Laboratory of Cytogenetics, Institute of Medical Genetics. Therefore, these CNVs have a high likelihood of being benign and may represent polymorphisms.

We observed no candidate genes overlap between CNVs identified in our study and SNPs associated with coronary artery disease on a genome-wide level24. This result confirms the idea that CNVs could be new genetic markers to uncover susceptibility loci for future disease association studies.

In our study three different patients contained CNVs in genetic regions previously associated with coronary artery calcification in African Americans and carotid intima media thickness over 10 years in Chinese (2q37.3(LOC105373979, LOC728323), 1p22.2 (GBP3) and 10q21.1 (PCDH15))25,26.

The GBP3 and PCDH15 genes are a promising candidate for further study. Guanylate binding protein 3 (GBP3) belong to a family of proteins termed the guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs) that are induced in response to interferons. The function of these proteins has been primarily associated to protection against viral and bacterial infections27. GBPs may be also involved in the macrophage activation process with a potential role in atherogenesis. There was significant induction of GBP3 gene expression in foam cells of advanced lesions of aortic sinuses isolated from apoE−/− mice fed Western diet for 14 weeks28,29.

Protocadherin 15 (PCDH15) encodes an integral membrane protein that mediates calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion. So far nothing is known about the function of this protein in the arterial structure and function. PCDH15 gene can be involved in the susceptibility to coronary artery disease via alteration of lipid metabolism. SNPs in PCDH15 have been associated with triglycerides, apolipoprotein B and total cholesterol levels in familial combined hyperlipidemia30. In two patients CNV located 16q22.1 harboured amplification encompassing gene PDPR.

There is a hypothesis that amplification of PDPR gene might affect predisposition to coronary artery disease, while a loss of copy number may cause weaker recovery from heart attack due to alteration of protein function in the heart31.

One interesting finding is that the majority of CNVs located genes were associated with coronary artery disease risk factors but not with coronary artery disease directly (Table 1). For example, we found genetic losses at 1q31.3 (CFHR3, CFHR1), 3p21.1 (SFMBT1) and 22q11.23 (GSTT1). The SNPs of these genes were associated with blood pressure or hypertension in different populations32,33,34. Common deletion variant spanning CFHR1 and CFHR3 genes has been associated with complement over-activation, and increased inflammatory process35,36. SFMBT1 encoding the Scm-like with four mbt domains protein 1 is involved in epigenetic regulation of gene expression via the histone methylation mechanism37. The molecular mechanism by which genetic variants of SFMBT1 gene contribute to hypertension risk remains unknown. Сomplete deletion of the GSTT1 gene lead to the complete absence of glutathione-S-transferase enzymatic activity and predispose to oxidative stress which implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension34.

Obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome are important contributing causes of coronary artery disease. In our study one patient had the loss in region 9p21.1 (LINGO2). The leucine-rich repeat and Ig domain–containing 2 gene is expressed in neuronal tissue, and rs10968576 have been associated with body mass index38,39. This study also revealed CNV at 1p21.1 affecting AMY2B gene known to be associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus40. The pancreatic alpha-amylase gene codes for a protein that catalyzes the initial step in digestion of dietary starch and glycogen. CNVs in the AMY2B gene were significantly correlated with serum amylase levels and high amylase activity is related to improved glycemic homeostasis and lower frequencies of metabolic syndrome41. Finally, two of the deletions observed in the current study also fell into regions located at 7q33 and 16q13.12-q13.11, which is reported to harbour the metabolic syndrome candidate genes EXOC4 and PDXDC1, respectively42,43.

To confirm the array CGH data, quantification of the dosage of genes present in amplifications at chromosomes 10q24.31 (ERLIN1) and 12q24.11 (UNG, ACACB) was performed by qPCR. These genes were selected for their potential functional roles in cardiovascular disease and risk factors associated with obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome.

Amplification in chromosomal region 10q24.31 (ERLIN1) was novel compared with the DGV. ER lipid raft associated 1 (ERLIN1) is a component of the lipid rafts of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)44. Lipid rafts are regions of the plasma membrane that act as platforms to colocalize proteins involved in intracellular signalling pathways. ERLIN1 is a cholesterol-binding protein that is directly involved in regulating the SREBP machinery45. ERLIN1 interacts with ERLIN2 to form a functional complex. A recent study of copy number variation in human breast cancer specimens demonstrated that ERLIN2 is amplified and overexpressed in aggressive human breast cancer46. Increased expression of ERLIN2 promotes the activation of the key lipogenic regulator SREBP1c and the production of cytosolic lipid droplets in breast cancer cells. The ERLIN1/ERLIN2 complex promotes ER-associated degradation of the activated IP3 receptor and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR), which is the well-known target of the statins45. SNPs near ERLIN1 have previously been associated with the plasma levels of alanine aminotransferase and intracerebral haemorrhage in humans47,48. The mechanism of the increased copy number of ERLIN1 in regulating cellular cholesterol homeostasis in patients with coronary artery and metabolic diseases must be further elucidated in future studies.

The gain CNV region in 12q24.11 occurs in ACACB, which encodes an enzyme with a wide range of important functions. The acetyl‐CoA carboxylase β enzyme is bound to the mitochondrial outer membrane. This enzyme produces malonyl-CoA that can be used either as a substrate for lipogenesis or as a negative modulator of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation through its inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1a. ACACB enzyme activity is controlled at the transcriptional level by several transcription factors, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs), and is predominantly expressed in the heart and skeletal muscle. Mice deficient for Acacb exhibit increased overall and tissue-specific fatty acid oxidation49. Although originally shown to protect against diet-induced obesity and diabetes, follow-up studies observed that deletion of this gene upregulated mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation without altering overall energy homeostasis50. Cardiac-specific deletion of ACACB is sufficient to maintain fatty acid oxidation and prevent the metabolic remodelling that occurs during the development of pressure-overload hypertrophy51. At the juncture of lipid synthesis and oxidation pathways, inhibition of this enzyme presents a therapeutic target for metabolic syndrome. ACACB polymorphisms are associated with obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome in humans52. The gain in 12q24.11 (ACACB) was described in the DGV. The presence of this ACACB gain among the general population may indicate incomplete penetrance of the CNV, variable expression, or the presence of other genetic or environmental factors. Furthermore, many of the DGV individuals were recruited for different research studies not related to cardiovascular and metabolic disorders. It is possible that some of the gain carriers have ACACB overexpression and are affected by these disorders.

Somatic de novo genetic aberrations usually presented in the mosaic state are a common phenomenon in different tissues of healthy humans7. To the best of our knowledge, none of the previous studies compared the genomic alterations in atherosclerotic and intact arteries with those in the DNA extracted from the blood of the same individual. In the present study, we observed that two patients contained the gain in 10q24.31 (ERLIN1) and one patient contained the gain in 12q24.11 (UNG, ACACB) that affected only the blood DNA. Because the number of samples with a normal gene copy number exceeded the number of samples with gains, we hypothesize that an additional copy of a CNV region was added to a subset of leukocytes due postzygotic events, thereby resulting in somatic mosaicism. Notably, in this study, we measured the specific genomic alterations in a mixture of different cell types. Therefore, the fraction of cells in the arteries (e.g., macrophages) may also contain an undetected gain, such as low-level mosaicism. Further experiments in a larger cohort of patients and healthy persons using laser microdissection techniques and digital PCR are necessary to confirm our findings.

In addition to CNVs, we also detected areas of another type of genomic structural variations, such as cn-LOH. A wide range of cn-LOH regions was observed in leukocytes and different tissues of both healthy individuals and patients with cancer53,54. In our study, there were eight interstitial cn-LOH regions (>1.5 Mb) present in all studied arteries of four men with coronary artery disease and metabolic comorbidity. We suggest that these cn-LOH regions represent normal variations because they existed in all studied tissues of a patient. Six genes (ABCB1, PLAT, ACE, GH1, PECAM1, and RGS9) known to predispose people to coronary artery disease occur in the cn-LOH regions identified.

The results of this study demonstrate no significant evidence for high-confidence coronary artery-specific CNVs and cn-LOHs when the DNA from CAP was compared with IMA. It is possible that some existing somatic genomic structural variations may be missed in our study because of the limitations of the Agilent microarray platform with a gene-centric probe set and the strict analysis procedure used. Because we studied only 20 paired arterial samples derived from 10 patients, we cannot entirely exclude the occurrence of rare pathogenic CNVs and cn-LOH regions. Nevertheless, massively parallel sequencing of the whole genome from atherosclerotic lesions should be performed to provide more information regarding the involvement of somatic gene mutations in the development of the disease.

In conclusion, we discovered and confirmed amplification of the 10q24.31 (ERLIN1) and 12q24.11 (UNG, ACACB) genomic regions in these patients. It is possible that the rate of cell proliferation in arteries is lower than that of blood that continuously renews, providing more opportunities for genomic alterations over time in blood cells. Analysis of the DNA extracted from blood indicates a possible somatic origin for these CNVs. Taken together, the array CGH analysis of 10 patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic comorbidity using the Agilent SurePrint G3 Human CGH + SNP Microarray 2 × 400 K identified 90 different genomic structural rearrangements. Some CNVs and cn-LOH regions are enriched with genes previously associated with cardiovascular diseases and metabolic syndrome based on association studies.

Methods

All experimental protocols were approved by the Research Institute of Medical Genetics Ethics Committee, and all methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. All study subjects provided written informed consent before participating. We analyzed with array-CGH ten Russian men (age 56.1 ± 3.0 years, mean ± SD) with severe 3-vessel coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Each patient had a history of myocardial infarction prior to surgery and all components of metabolic syndrome (abdominal obesity, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes mellitus). Thirty-three men (age 56.8 ± 7.3 years, mean ± SD) with coronary artery disease confirmed by angiography and undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were included in the validation study (Table S4). All patients had metabolic syndrome defined according to the American Heart Association/National Heart Lung and Blood Institute modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines, which require individuals to meet ≥3 of the following criteria: waist circumference >102 cm; triglyceride levels ≥1.7 mmol/L or treatment for dyslipidaemia; HDL levels <1.04 mmol/L or treatment for dyslipidaemia; blood pressure levels ≥130/85 mm Hg or treatment for hypertension; and fasting plasma glucose levels ≥6.1 mmol/L or treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus55. Twenty-six patients (79%) had a history of myocardial infarction prior to surgery. Hypertension was diagnosed in 25 (76%) patients. Sixteen patients (48%) had hypercholesterolaemia, and nine patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus (27%).

Matched biopsy specimens were obtained from the CAP and IMA of thirty-three patients during coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Blood samples were obtained prior to the operation for all patients. The atherosclerotic lesions of the right coronary artery were classified as advanced according to the surgeon’s recommendations. Immediately after the operation, the samples were examined by a pathologist, cleaned of calcifications, fatty deposits and thrombotic material, and washed with sterile physiological saline solution. All samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until further use.

Before the molecular cytogenetic analysis, several artery samples were stained with haematoxylin and eosin or immunostained with antibodies against smooth muscle-specific α-actin (clone 1A4, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and CD68 (clone KP1, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Smooth muscle cells were predominant in all analysed samples. Specimens collected from the CAP contained a large accumulation of macrophages to compare with the IMA.

DNA was then extracted from the arteries and blood using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. In the present study, ten paired arteries (CAP and IMA) were analysed using array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH). Validation of selected CNVs in thirty-three paired arteries (CAP and IMA) and the blood of patients was performed using real-time PCR.

We performed the array-CGH using the Agilent SurePrint G3 Human CGH + SNP Microarray 2 × 400 K (G4842A, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). This microarray contains both 292 K CGH-probes and 120 K SNP-probes. DNA isolated from the arteries was hybridized against a sex-matched single reference DNA (Human Reference DNA-Male with Caucasian ethnicity, 5190-3796, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). After labelling with fluorescent dyes, the test and reference DNAs were hybridized on the microarray and washed and scanned according to manufacturer’s protocol.

The array-CGH data were normalized, centralized, and GC-corrected. All data were analysed using two programs in parallel to obtain high-confidence calls, Agilent Genomic Workbench v. 7.0 software (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and DNAcopy package (R/Bioconductor). At least three consecutive probes were used to call a CNV. For the Agilent Genomic Workbench, the aberration algorithm of the Aberration Detection Method-2 was used with a minimum absolute average log2 ratio of 0.25 per region. Finally, CNVs with length <1 kb were also discarded. The other algorithm used to call CNVs was a circular binary segmentation algorithm implemented in the DNAcopy package of R/Bioconductor56. The default settings and a log2 ratio cut-off of −1.0 and 1.0 for loss and gain, respectively, was used to call CNVs. Any segment with an absolute median log2 ratio to median absolute deviation value less than 2 was filtered out. The CNVs detected with the Agilent Genomic Workbench and DNAcopy package for each individual were merged using outer probe boundaries. We defined a CNV as ‘high-confidence’ if it was detected by both algorithms at the sample level. We also visually inspected each chromosome for DNA aberrations.

CNV calls were compared to the general population variants using the Database of Genomic Variants, build 37 (hg19) (DGV), and the array-CGH database at the Laboratory of Cytogenetics (Institute of Medical Genetics), which comprises 123 analysed patient samples and publications indexed in PubMed. CNV calls were considered novel if they did not overlap with more than 50% of the genome locus of previously reported CNV regions in the DGV. Functional enrichment analysis of genes located in CNVs and cn-LOH was performed using the web-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit57. The reference gene set comprised the human genome genes. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) categories were determined using a hypergeometric statistical test. P-values were corrected for multiple testing using FDR. We also used the HuGE Navigator Database to identify disease-gene association with the cardiovascular diseases.

CNVs of interest were validated using TaqMan copy number probes Hs00986678_cn and Hs06959694_cn (Life Technologies, California, USA), according to the manufacturer’s standard protocol. RNaseP locus was used as internal control for gDNA copy-number standardization (TaqMan Copy Number Reference Assay RNase P, reference 4403328). Genomic real-time quantitative PCR analysis (qPCR) was performed using the AriaMx Real-Time PCR System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The Human Reference DNA-Male with Caucasian ethnicity (5190-3796, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) sample was used as a calibrator. All samples within each run were assayed in triplicate and averaged to determine the copy number. For each assay, a standard curve was run and recorded. A relative quantification analysis was performed using the Pfaffl method considering the amplification efficiencies of each primer pair58. Values in the range of 0.8–1.2 indicated the presence of two copies, <0.6 indicated a copy number loss and >1.4 was considered a gain.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Nazarenko, M. S. et al. Genomic structural variations for cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidity. Sci. Rep. 7, 41268; doi: 10.1038/srep41268 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. The metabolic syndrome is associated with advanced vascular damage in patients with coronary heart disease, stroke, peripheral arterial disease or abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur Heart J. 25, 342–348, doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.12.007 (2004).

  2. 2.

    et al. Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease. Nat Rev Genet. 11, 446–450, doi: 10.1038/nrg2809 (2010).

  3. 3.

    , & Non-heritable genetics of human disease: spotlight on post-zygotic genetic variation acquired during lifetime. Postgrad Med J. 89, 417–426, doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-101322rep (2013).

  4. 4.

    et al. Age-related somatic structural changes in the nuclear genome of human blood cells. Am J Hum Genet. 90, 217–228, doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.12.009 (2012).

  5. 5.

    et al. Somatic mosaicism for copy number variation in differentiated human tissues. Hum Mutat. 29, 1118–1124, doi: 10.1002/humu.20815 (2008).

  6. 6.

    , , , & Extensive genetic variation in somatic human tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 18018–18023, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213736109 (2012).

  7. 7.

    et al. Somatic mosaicism for copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity and DNA copy number variations in the human genome. BMC Genomics. 16, 703, doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1916-3 (2015).

  8. 8.

    & Copy number variation in the human genome and its implications for cardiovascular disease. Circulation 115, 3130–3138, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.677591 (2007).

  9. 9.

    et al. Copy number variants: distribution in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 23, 1095–1100, doi: 10.1080/13102818.2009.10817620 (2009).

  10. 10.

    et al. Genetic copy number variants in myocardial infarction patients with hyperlipidemia. BMC Genomics. 12, Suppl 3:S23, doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-S3-S23 (2011).

  11. 11.

    et al. Gene-targeted analysis of copy number variants identifies 3 novel associations with coronary heart disease traits. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 5, 555–560, doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.111.961037 (2012).

  12. 12.

    & Evidence for a monoclonal origin of human atherosclerotic plaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70, 1753–1756 (1973).

  13. 13.

    et al. Role of somatic mutations in vascular disease formation. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 10, 173–185, doi: 10.1586/erm.10.1 (2010).

  14. 14.

    , , & DNA modifications in atherosclerosis: from the past to the future. Atherosclerosis 230, 202–209, doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.07.038 (2013).

  15. 15.

    et al. Cytogenetic analysis reveals clonal proliferation of smooth muscle cells in atherosclerotic plaques. Hum Genet. 87, 139–143 (1991).

  16. 16.

    , , & Loss of heterozygosity and microsatellite instability in human atherosclerotic plaques. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 225, 186–190 (1996).

  17. 17.

    , , & Microsatellite instability in human atherosclerotic plaques. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 220, 137–140 (1996).

  18. 18.

    , & Instability at the H-ras minisatellite in human atherosclerotic plaques. Atherosclerosis 125, 47–51 (1996).

  19. 19.

    , , , & Loss of heterozygosity in DNA mismatch repair genes in human atherosclerotic plaques. Mol Cell Biol Res Commun. 4, 62–65 (2000).

  20. 20.

    et al. Chromosomal alterations in atherosclerotic plaques. Atherosclerosis 154, 755–761 (2001).

  21. 21.

    , , & Loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 1, 2, 8, 9 and 17 in cerebral atherosclerotic plaques. Int J Biol Markers 16, 167–171 (2001).

  22. 22.

    et al. Loss of heterozygosity of the NOS3 dinucleotide repeat marker in atherosclerotic plaques of human carotid arteries. Atherosclerosis 159, 261–267 (2001).

  23. 23.

    , & Genomic rearrangements on VCAM1, SELE, APEG1and AIF1 loci in atherosclerosis. J Cell Mol Med. 9, 153–159 (2005).

  24. 24.

    & Genome-wide association studies of late-onset cardiovascular disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 83, 131–141, doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.04.004 (2015).

  25. 25.

    et al. Genetics of coronary artery calcification among African Americans, a meta-analysis. BMC Med Genet. 14, 75, doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-14-75 (2013).

  26. 26.

    et al. Genome-wide association study on progression of carotid artery intima media thickness over 10 years in a Chinese cohort. Atherosclerosis 243, 30–37, doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.08.034 (2015).

  27. 27.

    et al. A family of IFNc–inducible 65-kD GTPases protects against bacterial infection. Science. 332, 717–72 (2011).

  28. 28.

    Interferon-gamma and lipopolysaccharide induce mouse guanylate-binding protein 3 (mGBP3) expression in the murine macrophage cell line RAW264.7. Arch Pharm Res. 22, 130–136 (1999).

  29. 29.

    , , & Transcriptional Profiling of Foam Cells Reveals Induction of Guanylate-Binding Proteins Following Western Diet Acceleration of Atherosclerosis in the Absence of Global Changes in Inflammation. J Am Heart Assoc. 5, e002663, doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002663 (2016).

  30. 30.

    et al. A nonsynonymous SNP within PCDH15 is associated with lipid traits in familial combined hyperlipidemia. Hum Genet. 127, 83–89, doi: 10.1007/s00439-009-0749-z (2010).

  31. 31.

    et al. Novel association strategy with copy number variation for identifying new risk Loci of human diseases. PLoS One 5, e12185, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012185 (2010).

  32. 32.

    et al. Associations of CFH polymorphisms and CFHR1-CFHR3 deletion with blood pressure and hypertension in Chinese population. PLoS One 7, e42010, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042010 (2012).

  33. 33.

    et al. Identification of IGF1, SLC4A4, WWOX, and SFMBT1 as hypertension susceptibility genes in Han Chinese with a genome-wide gene-based association study. PLoS One 7, e32907, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032907 (2012).

  34. 34.

    & Glutathione-S-transferase M1 and T1 null genotypes are associated with hypertension risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 studies. Curr Hypertens Rep. 16, 432, doi: 10.1007/s11906-014-0432-1 (2014).

  35. 35.

    et al. Association of genetic variants in complement factor H and factor H-related genes with systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002079, doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002079 (2011).

  36. 36.

    & Complement regulators in human disease: lessons from modern genetics. J Intern Med. 277, 294–305, doi: 10.1111/joim.12338 (2015).

  37. 37.

    et al. SFMBT1 functions with LSD1 to regulate expression of canonical histone genes and chromatin-related factors. Genes Dev. 27, 749–766, doi: 10.1101/gad.210963.112 (2013).

  38. 38.

    et al. Six new loci associated with body mass index highlight a neuronal influence on body weight regulation. Nat Genet. 41, 25–34, doi: 10.1038/ng.287 (2009).

  39. 39.

    , , & Association of the LINGO2-related SNP rs10968576 with body mass in a cohort of elderly Swedes. Mol Genet Genomics 290, 1485–1491, doi: 10.1007/s00438-015-1009-7 (2015).

  40. 40.

    et al. The Role of Copy Number Variation in African Americans with Type 2 Diabetes-Associated End Stage Renal Disease. J Mol Genet Med. 7, 61 (2013).

  41. 41.

    Low serum amylase and obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome: A novel interpretation. World J Diabetes 7, 112–121, doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i6.112 (2016).

  42. 42.

    et al. Polymorphisms near EXOC4 and LRGUK on chromosome 7q32 are associated with Type 2 Diabetes and fasting glucose; the NHLBI Family Heart Study. BMC Med Genet. 9, 46, doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-9-46 (2008).

  43. 43.

    et al. Pleiotropic genes for metabolic syndrome and inflammation. Mol Genet Metab. 112, 317–338, doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.04.007 (2014).

  44. 44.

    , , & Erlin-1 and erlin-2 are novel members of the prohibitin family of proteins that define lipid-raft-like domains of the ER. J Cell Sci. 119, 3149–3160, doi: 10.1242/jcs.03060 (2006).

  45. 45.

    , , & Erlins restrict SREBP activation in the ER and regulate cellular cholesterol homeostasis. J Cell Biol. 203, 427–436, doi: 10.1083/jcb.201305076 (2013).

  46. 46.

    et al. Endoplasmic reticulum factor ERLIN2 regulates cytosolic lipid content in cancer cells. Biochem J. 446, 415–425, doi: 10.1042/BJ20112050 (2012).

  47. 47.

    et al. The ERLIN1-CHUK-CWF19L1 gene cluster influences liver fat deposition and hepatic inflammation in the NHLBI Family Heart Study. Atherosclerosis 228, 175–180, doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.01.038 (2013).

  48. 48.

    et al. Association of genetic variants with hemorrhagic stroke in Japanese individuals. Int J Mol Med. 25, 649–656 (2010).

  49. 49.

    , , , & Acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2-/-mutant mice are protected against fatty liver under high-fat, high-carbohydrate dietary and de novo lipogenic conditions. J Biol Chem. 287, 12578–12588, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.309559 (2012).

  50. 50.

    , , , & Gene knockout of Acc2 has little effect on body weight, fat mass, or food intake. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 7598–7603, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913492107 (2010).

  51. 51.

    et al. Cardiac-specific deletion of acetyl CoA carboxylase 2 prevents metabolic remodeling during pressure-overload hypertrophy. Circ Res. 111, 728–738, doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.268128 (2012).

  52. 52.

    et al. Association of ACACB polymorphisms with obesity and diabetes. Mol Genet Metab. 104, 670–676, doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.08.013 (2011).

  53. 53.

    et al. Detectable clonal mosaicism and its relationship to aging and cancer. Nat Genet. 44, 651–658, doi: 10.1038/ng.2270 (2012).

  54. 54.

    et al. Detectable clonal mosaicism from birth to old age and its relationship to cancer. Nat Genet. 44, 642–650, doi: 10.1038/ng.2271 (2012).

  55. 55.

    Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Final report. Circulation. 106, 3143–3421 (2002).

  56. 56.

    & A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data. Bioinformatics. 23, 657–663, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl646 (2007).

  57. 57.

    , , & WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt): update 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, W77–W83, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt439 (2013).

  58. 58.

    A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45 (2001).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (№ 14-15-00305).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Population Genetics, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia

    • Maria S. Nazarenko
    • , Aleksei A. Sleptcov
    • , Anton V. Markov
    • , Maria V. Golubenko
    • , Iuliia A. Koroleva
    •  & Valery P. Puzyrev
  2. Laboratory of Human Ontogenetics, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia

    • Maria S. Nazarenko
    • , Aleksei A. Sleptcov
    • , Igor N. Lebedev
    • , Nikolay A. Skryabin
    • , Anton V. Markov
    • , Maria V. Golubenko
    •  & Valery P. Puzyrev
  3. Laboratory of Cytogenetics, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia

    • Igor N. Lebedev
    •  & Nikolay A. Skryabin
  4. Department of Experimental and Clinical Cardiology, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia

    • Maria V. Golubenko
  5. Department of Multifocal Atherosclerosis, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia

    • Anton N. Kazancev
    •  & Olga L. Barbarash

Authors

  1. Search for Maria S. Nazarenko in:

  2. Search for Aleksei A. Sleptcov in:

  3. Search for Igor N. Lebedev in:

  4. Search for Nikolay A. Skryabin in:

  5. Search for Anton V. Markov in:

  6. Search for Maria V. Golubenko in:

  7. Search for Iuliia A. Koroleva in:

  8. Search for Anton N. Kazancev in:

  9. Search for Olga L. Barbarash in:

  10. Search for Valery P. Puzyrev in:

Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: M.S.N., I.N.L. and V.P.P. Performed the experiments: A.A.S., N.A.S., A.V.M. and I.A.K. Analyzed the data: A.A.S. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: A.N.K. and O.L.B. Wrote the paper: M.S.N., A.A.S., I.N.L. and M.V.G. Read and approved the final manuscript: M.S.N., A.A.S., I.N.L., N.A.S., A.V.M., M.V.G., I.A.K., A.N.K., O.L.B. and V.P.P.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria S. Nazarenko.

Supplementary information

Word documents

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41268

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.