Development of novel anti-influenza A virus (IAV) drugs with high efficiency and low toxicity is critical for preparedness against influenza outbreaks. Herein, we investigated the anti-IAV activities and mechanisms of fucoidan in vitro and in vivo. The results showed that a fucoidan KW derived from brown algae Kjellmaniella crassifolia effectively blocked IAV infection in vitro with low toxicity. KW possessed broad anti-IAV spectrum and low tendency of induction of viral resistance, superior to the anti-IAV drug amantadine. KW was capable of inactivating virus particles before infection and blocked some stages after adsorption. KW could bind to viral neuraminidase (NA) and inhibit the activity of NA to block the release of IAV. KW also interfered with the activation of EGFR, PKCα, NF-κB, and Akt, and inhibited both IAV endocytosis and EGFR internalization in IAV-infected cells, suggesting that KW may also inhibit cellular EGFR pathway. Moreover, intranasal administration of KW markedly improved survival and decreased viral titers in IAV-infected mice. Therefore, fucoidan KW has the potential to be developed into a novel nasal drop or spray for prevention and treatment of influenza in the future.
Influenza A virus (IAV) is a most formidable pathogen, which has been the cause of at least three pandemics in the last century. The most severe IAV pandemic caused more than 40 million deaths in the world during 1918–19191,2. In late April 2009, a novel influenza A (H1N1) virus caused a pandemic within a short period of time, which attracted great attention all over the world. Current anti-IAV drugs are directed against the viral M2 protein (adamantane and rimantadine) and neuraminidase (zanamivir and oseltamivir)3,4. Despite these successes, drug resistance, toxicity, and cost remain unresolved issues in the fight against IAV infection5,6,7. Hence, the development of novel anti-IAV agents that could be used alone or in combination with existing antiviral drugs is of high importance.
Influenza A virus can enter host cells by clathrin-mediated endocytosis or macropinocytosis after the virus binds to sialic acid residues via the viral hemagglutinin (HA)8. Eierhoff et al. reported that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) can promote uptake of IAV into host cells, and the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway which can be activated by EGFR can also enhance IAV uptake8. Moreover, the viral neuraminidase (NA) protein was reported to be able to promote IAV entry into target cells during the initial stage of virus infection, in addition to promote the release process of progeny virus from host cells9. Thus, inhibitors of cellular EGFR pathway and viral NA protein may be used alone or in combination with other drugs to block both the invasion and release process of IAV.
Fucoidan, a sulfated polysaccharide found mainly in brown algae, was reported to possess a variety of biological activities, including anti-coagulant10, anti-viral11,12,13,14, anti-tumor15, and anti-inflammatory effects16. The functional properties of fucoidan make it an attractive target for the development of biomaterials and drugs17. Hayashi et al. reported that a fucoidan isolated from Undaria pinnatifida possessed anti-IAV activities in mice with normal and compromised immunity18. Synytsya and co-workers reported that the Mekabu fucoidan could inhibit avian IAV replication through enhancing immune system in mice19. Moreover, fucoidans could be used as vaccine adjuvants to activate spleen cells and enhance antigen-specific antibody production in mice20. Therefore, fucoidans have the potential to be developed into novel anti-IAV agents in the future.
To further correlate the potential anti-IAV applications of fucoidan with its underlying molecular mechanisms, the anti-IAV actions and mechanisms of fucoidan were investigated in vitro and in vivo in this study. The results showed that the fucoidan KW derived from brown algae Kjellmaniella crassifolia possessed broad anti-IAV spectrum and low tendency of induction of viral resistance. KW may possibly block IAV invasion and release process by targeting viral neuraminidase and cellular EGFR pathway.
Inhibition of influenza A virus multiplication in vitro by fucoidan polysaccharides
The fucoidan KW was extracted from brown algae Kjellmaniella crassifolia following the methods described previously21. The average molecular weight of KW determined by gel filtration chromatography was about 536 kDa (Table 1). The sulfate content of KW was 30.1% as determined by the method of Dodgson and Price22 (Table 1), and the purity of KW was more than 98% as determined by HPLC. The structure of KW was determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analysis, which showed that KW is a 3-linked 2,4-O-disulfated fucooligosaccharide branched glucuronomannan (Fig. 1A)23.
The cytotoxicity of KW was firstly evaluated by MTT assay24. The results showed that KW exhibited no significant cytotoxicity at the concentrations from 62.5 to 2000 μg/ml (Fig. 1B). KW showed some cytotoxicity to MDCK cells at 2000 μg/ml but without statistical significance. The maximum non-toxic concentration was about 1000 μg/mL (Fig. 1B). Moreover, the CC50 (50% Cytotoxicity Concentration) value for KW was about 2752.6 μg/ml (Table 1).
KW was then assayed for its ability to inhibit IAV multiplication in vitro using CPE inhibition assay and hemagglutination (HA) assay25,26. MDCK cells were initially infected with influenza virus (A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1); PR8) (MOI = 0.1), and then treated with KW at the indicated concentrations after removal of the virus inoculum. At 48 hours post infection (p.i.), the viral titers in the culture media were determined by HA assay, and cell viability was measured by CPE inhibition assay. As shown in Fig. 1C,D, KW significantly reduced the virus HA titer and promote cell viability when used at the concentration >62.5 μg/mL (p < 0.01). The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50 value) of KW for CPE inhibition was about 34.4 μg/mL, and the selectivity index (CC50/IC50) for KW was approximately 80.0, which was superior to that of ribavirin (SI = 31.0) and slightly less than that of oseltamivir carboxylate (SI = 88.1) (Table 1). Moreover, the HA assay was also performed in human lung epithelial cells (A549 cells) to explore whether the inhibition of IAV by KW was cell-specific or not. As shown in Fig. 1D, viral replication in A549 cells was also dose-dependently inhibited by KW and KW significantly reduced the virus HA titer when used at the concentration >62.5 μg/mL ((p < 0.05).
To explore whether KW had direct inhibition actions on viral particles, the plaque reduction assay was performed as described previously27. In brief, PR8 virus (50–100 PFU/well) was pre-incubated with or without KW for 60 min at 37 °C before infection. Then the virus-KW mixture was transferred to confluent cell monolayers in 6-well plates, incubated at 37 °C for 1 h and subjected to plaque assay. As shown in Fig. 1E, pre-incubation of PR8 with KW at the concentrations of 31.25–250 μg/ml markedly reduced the number of plaques and protected MDCK cells, suggesting that KW may be able to inactivate viral particles directly.
KW possesses broad anti-IAV spectrum and low tendency of induction of viral resistance.
Effects of KW on a single cycle of virus replication
Since the PR8 virus was isolated several decades ago, we were interested whether KW possesses antiviral activities against the current pandemic human and swine strains. Thus, the inhibition of KW on the virus yields from MDCK cells infected with PR8 (H1N1), Cal09 (A/California/04/2009; H1N1), Minnesota (A/swine/Minnesota/02719/2009; H3N2), and TX09 (A/Texas/15/2009; H1N1), at high moi (≈3.0 PFU/cell) were examined by HA assay and plaque assay. Briefly, MDCK cells were infected with KW-pretreated IAV and treated with KW after the infection period. At 24 h p.i., the HA titers and infectious virus titers of cell culture supernatants were determined. As shown in Fig. 2A,B, for all four viruses tested, the reduction of virus yields measured by both HA titer and infectious virus titer with increasing concentrations of KW were in a dose dependent manner. The IC50 values obtained for KW inhibition of PR8 virus were higher than that of Minnesota (H3N2) and the pandemic H1N1 virus (Cal09 and TX09) (Table 2). At the concentration of 31.25 μg/ml, the HA titers were reduced to about 50% of the untreated control for PR8, 25% of the control for Minnesota, 5% of the control for TX09 and 0% of the control for Cal09 (Fig. 2A).
Moreover, for each virus tested, the reduction in infectious virus titer corresponded to the reduction in HA titer with increasing concentrations of KW (Fig. 2B). The IC50 values obtained for KW inhibition of Cal09 (3.5 ± 0.9 μg/ml) and TX09 (8.4 ± 1.3 μg/ml) were lower than that of PR8 (30.7 ± 2.9 μg/ml) and Minnesota (21.4 ± 1.5 μg/ml) (Table 2). At the concentration of 31.25 μg/ml, the infectious virus titer was reduced to about 40% of the untreated control for PR8, 15% of the control for Minnesota, 12.5% of the control for TX09 and 0.2% of the control for Cal09 (Fig. 2B). Therefore, the pandemic H1N1 virus (Cal09) may be the virus that was most susceptible to KW treatment.
Effects of KW over multiple cycles of infection
The inhibition effects of KW on IAV infection was also examined over multiple cycles of infection using plaque reduction assay27. Briefly, MDCK cells were infected with KW pretreated virus (PR8, Cal09, TX09 or Minnesota) at an moi of 0.003 pfu for 1 h at 37 °C, and then subjected to plaque assay. As shown in Fig. 2C, KW significantly inhibited the plaque formation in Cal09, TX09 and Minnesota infected cells when used at the concentration >3.9 μg/ml. For PR8 virus, the IC50 value for plaque number reduction was about 30.5 ± 3.7 μg/ml (Table 2). However, in Minnesota-infected cells an obvious inhibition of KW on plaque formation was observed and the IC50 value for Minnesota was only 6.3 ± 0.1 μg/ml, largely superior to that for PR8 virus (Fig. 2D and Table 2). KW showed more significant inhibition on plaque formation in Cal09 and TX09 infected cells, with IC50 values of 3.8 ± 0.2 and 2.9 ± 0.1 μg/ml, respectively (Table 2). Thus, KW could inhibit both H1N1 and H3N2 virus multiplication in vitro.
KW possesses low tendency of induction of viral resistance
To explore whether KW induces the IAV to produce drug resistance, a multi-passage experiment based on CPE inhibition assay and HA assay was performed27. Based on the results of CPE inhibition assay, the IC50 values of KW, amantadine and Oseltamivir against PR8 virus are about 34.4, 23.8 and 13.1 μg/ml, respectively (Table 1). Thus, 125 μg/ml of KW, 50 μg/ml of amantadine, and 25 μg/ml of Oseltamivir (~2–4 times of IC50) were used in the multi-passaging experiment. As shown in Fig. 2E,F, the results showed that a remarkable viral resistance is induced by amantadine or Oseltamivir, suggesting that a low-level replication is allowed which gives the IAV a chance to adapt to the selective pressure of amantadine or Oseltamivir (Fig. 2E). However, KW could still markedly reduce the virus titer in culture media and promote cell viability after the fourth and fifth passage, suggesting that KW was still efficient in inhibiting PR8 propagation (Fig. 2E,F). Therefore, KW possesses broad-spectrum anti-IAV activities and low risk of inducing drug resistance.
Influence of different treatment conditions of KW on IAV infection
Various time-points were assessed to determine the stage(s) at which KW exerted its inhibitory effects in vitro. In brief, MDCK cells were infected with Minnesota (H3N2) or PR8 (MOI = 0.1) under four different treatment conditions: pre-treatment of viruses, pre-treatment of cells, during virus adsorption, or after adsorption. At 24 h p.i., the antiviral activity was determined by HA assay26,27. As shown in Fig. 3A, pretreatment of Minnesota or PR8 with 250 μg/ml KW for 1 h before infection significantly inhibited the virus HA titers compared to that in virus control group (p < 0.01), suggesting that KW may have direct interaction with IAV particles. However, either the addition of KW during virus adsorption or pretreatment of cells did not significantly decrease the virus titers (Fig. 3A), which suggested that KW may not interact with MDCK cells directly. Interestingly, post-treatment of cells with KW after virus adsorption also significantly reduced the virus titers as compared to that in virus control group (p < 0.01) (Fig. 3A). Thus, KW may be able to inactivate virus particles directly and block some stages after virus adsorption.
Moreover, another time course study was also performed to explore which viral stage after adsorption is inhibited by KW as described previously28. Briefly, IAV (MOI = 1.0)-infected MDCK cells were treated with 250 μg/mL of KW for different time intervals, then the virus yields at 24 h p.i. were evaluated by plaque assay. The results showed that KW treatment for the first 4 h (0–4 h p.i.) after adsorption resulted in a significant reduction of virus titer (about 10-fold) (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3B), which suggested that KW may be able to inhibit IAV entry. However, greater inhibition was noted (about 100-fold) when KW was added 4 h after infection (4–8 h p.i.) (p < 0.01), and it was almost as effective as that in the group with KW treatment during 0–24 h p.i (Fig. 3B), suggesting that KW may also be able to inhibit newly released IAV from infecting cells.
Since KW may interact directly with virus particles, we then explored whether KW had interaction with virus surface HA protein by using the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. The results showed that the anti-HA antibodies significantly inhibited the PR8 virus-induced aggregation of chicken erythrocytes at the concentrations of 0.625–5 μg/mL (Fig. 3C), which suggested that the anti-HA antibody can obstruct the virus attachment to red blood cells through binding to HA. However, KW could not inhibit virus-induced aggregation of chicken erythrocytes even at a concentration of 250 μg/ml (Fig. 3C), suggesting that KW may have no direct interaction with viral HA protein.
We next asked if the decreased virus titer was due to direct inhibition of viral NA activity by performing NA inhibition assay29,30. To address this question, we tested the inhibition effects of KW on the NA activity and compared it to the effect of Zanamivir, a well-known NA inhibitor29,30. As shown in Fig. 3D, KW inhibited the NA activity of the PR8 virus at low IC50 value (8.8 μg/ml), and the inhibition effect of KW on NA activity was in a dose-dependent manner at the concentrations of 15.625–125 μg/mL, suggesting that KW may directly bind to viral NA protein to inhibit IAV infection.
KW inhibits the neuraminidase activity of IAV to block virus release
Since KW may interact with NA protein to inhibit its activity, we then explored whether KW could block the release of IAV. Briefly, the PR8 virus infected MDCK cells were treated with KW or Zanamivir for 24 h and then examined by electron microscopy. As shown in Fig. 4A–C, compared to the untreated PR8-infected cells (Fig. 4A), Zanamivir treatment obviously inhibited the release of IAV and induced the aggregation of IAV particles (Fig. 4B). Similar to the phenomenon in Zanamivir-treated cells, KW treatment also induced viral aggregation on the cell surface at 24 h p.i. (Fig. 4C), suggesting that KW may interfere with the release of IAV, just like other neuraminidase inhibitors29. Therefore, KW may inhibit IAV infection through inhibiting the enzymatic activity of NA to block virus release.
To explore the influence of KW on the hydrolysis of sialic acids on cell surface by NA, FITC-labeled lectins were used to determine the amount of cell surface glycans. As shown in Fig. 4D, at 2 h p.i., the α-D-mannose-containing N-glycans (recognized by ConA), Galβ1-3GalNAcα-containing O-glycans (recognized by PNA), and α-L-fucose-containing N, O-glycans (recognized by UEA-I) had little change compared to that in non-infected cells. However, the Neu5Ac (sialic acid)-containing glycans, recognized by WGA, apparently decreased compared to that in non-infected cells (≈0.6-fold), which may be due to the hydrolysis of sialic acids by NA (Fig. 4D). In contrast, after treatment with KW for 2 h, the Neu5Ac-containing glycans almost restored to the same level as that in non-infected cells (≈1.1-fold) (Fig. 4D). Moreover, the 2′3-linked sialic acids highly expressed on the surface of MDCK cells, recognized by MAAI, displayed the same change tendency as the total sialic acids recognized by WGA (Fig. 4D), which suggested that KW truly inhibited the hydrolysis of sialic acid residues on cell surface by IAV.
To further explore whether the inhibition of NA activity by KW was subtype-specific or not, the NA inhibition assay was performed with two kinds of recombinant NA proteins (A/California/04/2009 (H1N1) and A/Babol/36/2005 (H3N2)). As shown in Fig. 4E, KW markedly inhibited the enzymatic activities of these two NA proteins at the concentration >31.25 μg/ml (all more than 70%), and the inhibition effects of KW were all in a dose-dependent manner at the concentrations of 15.625–125 μg/ml. The inhibition effects of KW on Cal09 NA protein was a little higher than that on H3N2 NA protein (Fig. 4E).
Moreover, the interaction between KW and NA protein was further evaluated by using SPR assay31,32. Briefly, with NA proteins being immobilized on the chip, KW at the concentrations of 25–200 nM (about 12.5–100 μg/ml) was flowed over the biosensor chip surface, respectively. Data revealed a marked binding of KW to Cal09 (H1N1) NA in a concentration-dependent manner with a KD equivalent to about 1.22E-8 M (12.2 nM), implicating a high affinity of KW for Cal09 NA (Fig. 4F). Thus, pretreatment of IAV with KW before infection may allow KW to fully bind NA and form a stable KW-NA complex. In addition, KW also bound to H3N2 NA in a dose-dependent manner with a KD equivalent to about 1.81E-8 M (18.1 nM), suggesting that KW could bind to the NA proteins of two different subtypes (H1N1 and H3N2) specifically (Fig. 4G). In contrast, KW weakly bound to HA protein with a much higher KD value (about 300 μM) (data not shown). Therefore, KW may directly bind to NA protein and inhibit its activity to block the invasion and release of IAV.
KW reduced IAV endocytosis through inhibition of EGFR pathway
It was reported that some cellular signaling receptors such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) are indispensable for IAV entry8,33,34,35,36, and fucoidans could inhibit the activation of EGFR in some cells37. Thus, we then examined whether the inhibition of KW against IAV entry was associated with EGFR pathway by indirect immunofluorescence assay. Briefly, A549 cells were infected with PR8 virus (MOI = 3.0) with or without KW (250 μg/ml) pretreatment at 37 °C for 1 h, or were stimulated with EGF (100 ng/ml), each for 1 h at 4 °C and 30 min at 37 °C. Then the localization of virus HA protein and cellular EGFR protein was detected by immunofluorescence assay. As shown in Fig. 5A–H, EGFR located at the plasma membrane in untreated cells (Fig. 5A–D), while after EGF stimulation, EGFR was internalized into cytoplasm (Fig. 5E–H), which was in concert with the endocytosis process of EGFR reported previously8. IAV infection also induced the internalization of IAV particles and EGFR proteins into cytoplasm, and some of them co-localized in the cytoplasm (the yellow dot) (Fig. 5I–L), which was in concert with the previous report that IAV and EGFR were sorted into the same population of late endosomes8. However, after KW pretreatment, both IAV particles and EGFR could be rarely detected in the cytoplasm and they mainly located at the cell membrane (Fig. 5M–P), suggesting that the inhibition of KW on IAV endocytosis may be associated with its inhibition of EGFR activation and internalization.
We next explored whether KW could inhibit the activation of EGFR by western blot. As shown in Fig. 5Q,R, after treatment with KW (250, 125 μg/ml) or Ribavirin (50 μg/ml) for 4 h, the levels of phosphorylated EGFR and PKCα protein were significantly reduced compared to that of the non-drug-treated control group (p < 0.05), suggesting that KW could inhibit EGFR pathway in IAV infected cells. Moreover, KW also significantly inhibited the expression of viral NP protein at 4 h p.i. (p < 0.01), suggesting that KW may block some early stage in IAV life cycle (Fig. 5Q). Thus, KW may block IAV infection through interfering with the activation of EGFR pathway.
To further investigate the inhibition of KW on EGFR pathway, the activation of downstream Akt and NF-κB pathways which is responsible for virus endocytosis and vRNA synthesis was also evaluated. As shown in Fig. 5S,T, the phosphorylated NF-κB significantly increased to 3.8-fold higher than normal control group after IAV infection for 4 h. However, KW (250, 125 μg/ml) treatment significantly inhibited the activation of NF-κB from 3.8 to about 1.8 and 2.6 fold of the normal control group, respectively (p < 0.01) (Fig. 5T). Moreover, the activation of Akt protein which is associated with IAV endocytosis was also evaluated (Fig. 5S,T). The results showed that treatment with KW (250, 125 μg/ml) for 4 h significantly decreased the expression level of phosphorylated Akt from 5.8 to about 2.1 and 2.6 fold of the normal control group, respectively (p < 0.05) (Fig. 5T). Therefore, the host NF-κB and PI3K/Akt pathways may also be involved in the anti-IAV actions of KW in vitro.
Intranasal KW application significantly supports survival of mice infected with IAV
The anti-IAV effects of fucoidan KW in vivo were also explored using a mouse pneumonia model38. In brief, IAV-infected mice received intranasal administration of KW (10 and 20 μg/day) or placebo (PBS) once daily for the entire experiment, and the selected subset of treated, infected mice were then sacrificed on Day 4 and the tissue samples were removed for further analysis. Subsequently, the pulmonary viral titers were determined by plaque assay27. As shown in Fig. 6A, after treatment of KW (20 μg/day) for four days, the pulmonary viral titers significantly decreased compared to that of the virus control group (p < 0.05), suggesting that intranasal therapy with KW could inhibit IAV multiplication in mice lungs. Oseltamivir (20 mg/kg/day) treatment also showed significant reduction of virus titers in mice lungs (p < 0.05) (Fig. 6A).
Moreover, the survival experiments were also performed to evaluate the effects of KW on the survival of IAV-infected mice. As shown in Fig. 6B, intranasal administration with KW (20 μg/day) significantly increased survival rates as compared to the placebo-treated control group (p < 0.05). By day 14 post infection, only 30% of the individuals in the placebo group survived whereas 80% of animals in the KW (20 μg/day)-treated group survived, comparable to that in Oseltamivir (20 mg/kg/day)-treated group (90%).
To further evaluate the effects of KW on viral pneumonia in mice, histopathology analysis was also performed. As shown in Fig. 6C–G, lung tissues in virus-control group showed marked infiltration of inflammatory cells in the alveolar walls and the presence of massive serocellular exudates in the lumen (Fig. 6D). However, mice treated with KW (10 or 20 μg/day) following infection had intact columnar epithelium in the bronchiole even in the presence of some serocellular exudates in the lumen (Fig. 6F,G). Moreover, the lung tissues with Oseltamivir (20 mg/kg/day) treatment also showed intact columnar epithelium (Fig. 6E). Thus, KW may be able to attenuate pneumonia symptoms in IAV infected mice.
Furthermore, fucoidans were reported to be able to inhibit avian IAV replication through enhancing immune system in mice19. Thus, we also explored whether KW could improve antiviral immune system by detecting the production of interferon γ (IFN-γ) and interleukin 2 (IL-2) in IAV infected mice. As shown in Fig. 6H,I, after treatment with KW for four days, the production of IFN-γ and IL-2 in spleens significantly increased as compared to the non-drug treated virus control group (p < 0.05), suggesting that the anti-IAV actions of KW in vivo may also be associated with its regulation effects on interferon system.
Recently, marine polysaccharides, especially the sulfated polysaccharides derived from marine algae, have attracted increasing interest as potential anti-viral drugs39,40,41,42. Fucoidan, a brown algae-derived sulfated polysaccharide, was reported to possess anti-viral activities against different viruses such as HIV and HSV11,12,13,14. Herein, fucoidan KW, a high molecular weight sulfated polysaccharide, was demonstrated to be able to suppress the replication of IAV in vitro with low toxicity (SI = 80.0). By using single cycle and multi-cycle replication assay, we found that KW could inhibit PR8 (H1N1), Minnesota (H3N2), Cal09 (H1N1) and TX09 (H1N1) virus replication in vitro, and the pandemic H1N1 virus (Cal09) was most susceptible to KW treatment (IC50 < 6.5 μg/ml). Moreover, compared to the anti-IAV drug amantadine and Oseltamivir, KW had low tendency of induction of viral resistance. Thus, fucoidan KW possesses broad-spectrum anti-IAV activities and low risk of inducing drug resistance.
Fucoidans were reported to have no direct pathogen-killing activity but rather, they inhibit infection via blocking virus entry and replication processes20. However, in contrast to the previous studies, we found that pretreatment of PR8 or H3N2 virus with KW before infection markedly reduced the viral titers (Fig. 3), suggesting that KW may have direct inactivation effects on IAV particles. By contrast, the addition of KW during virus adsorption or pretreatment of MDCK cells could not significantly decrease the virus titers, which suggested that KW may not interact with MDCK cells directly. Considered that KW did not directly bind HA protein to block virus-induced aggregation of chicken erythrocytes (Fig. 3C), we suppose that pretreatment of IAV with KW before infection may allow KW to fully bind NA and form a stable KW-NA complex to block IAV entry (Figs 4 and 5). Interestingly, post-treatment of cells with KW after adsorption also significantly reduced the virus titers, suggesting that KW may also block some stages after virus adsorption such as entry or release process.
The IAV neuraminidase (NA) protein was reported to be able to promote IAV entry into target cells, in addition to promote the release process of IAV9. Herein, we found that KW could induce viral aggregation on the cell surface and inhibit the activity of NA with low IC50 values (8.8 μg/ml), suggesting that KW may inhibit IAV infection by interfering with the NA activity of IAV. Moreover, SPR assay showed that KW could bind to the NA proteins of two different subtypes (H1N1 and H3N2) specifically (Fig. 4), suggesting that KW may directly interact with NA to inhibit its activity. Combined with the results that KW could inactivate virus particles directly and block some stages after adsorption (Fig. 3), we hypothesize that KW may inhibit the entry and release process of IAV through direct binding to viral neuraminidase.
IAV entry process often requires engagement of cellular EGFR and FGFR, which are representative receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family-members33,34. The downstream PI3K/Akt and NF-κB signaling of EGFR pathways were reported to be required for efficient virus endocytosis and vRNA synthesis8,35,36. Herein, KW was found to be able to inhibit the phosphorylation of EGFR, PKCα, NF-κB, and Akt proteins in IAV-infected cells (Fig. 5Q–T), which suggested that KW may inhibit the activation of EGFR and its downstream pathways. Considered that KW may hardly cross the cell membrane, we supposed that KW may interfere with the activation of EGFR, thus inhibiting the downstream PI3K/Akt and NF-κB pathways. Moreover, like EGF stimulation, IAV infection could induce the internalization of IAV particles and EGFR into cytoplasm (Fig. 5A–L). However, KW pretreatment could inhibit both IAV endocytosis and EGFR internalization in IAV-infected cells (Fig. 5M–P), suggesting that KW may block IAV endocytosis through interfering with the activation of EGFR. Eierhoff et al. proposed a hypothesis that multivalent binding of IAV to sialic acids on the cell membrane can trigger the clustering of RTK monomers, which induces the activation of RTKs to promote the internalization of RTKs and IAV8. On that basis, we posit that pretreatment of IAV with KW may allow KW to fully bind to IAV particles to block the multivalent binding of IAV to sialic acids, which interferes with the activation of EGFR pathway, thus inhibiting the invasion of IAV.
The in vitro antiviral effects of KW were mirrored in a murine pneumonia model of influenza. Treatment of PR8-infected mice with KW markedly improved their survival and decreased the pulmonary virus titers (Fig. 6). The survival benefits of KW observed in our study may involve a dual mechanism: inhibition of both IAV entry and release process. Moreover, the histopathological analysis indicated that KW treatment could also attenuate the pneumonia symptoms in IAV-infected lungs, which was comparable to the effects of Oseltamivir. Furthermore, KW also enhanced the production of IFN-γ and IL-2 in IAV-infected spleens, suggesting that the anti-IAV actions of KW in vivo may also be associated with its regulation effects on the interferon system. Although like other high-molecular weight polysaccharides, KW may hardly cross the different barriers of the body by oral administration, our studies showed that intranasal therapy of KW at low dose (10 or 20 μg/day) had comparable anti-IAV effects to Oseltamivir (20 mg/kg/day) (Fig. 6), which suggested that KW may be used for prevention and treatment of influenza by intranasal administration.
In summary, KW possesses anti-IAV activities in vitro and in vivo, and may block IAV invasion and release through targeting viral neuraminidase and cellular EGFR pathway. KW possesses broad-spectrum anti-IAV activities and low tendency of induction of viral resistance, superior to the anti-IAV drug amantadine. Further studies of the antiviral effects of KW against highly pathogenic IAV strains (H5N1 or H7N9 strain) will be required to advance it for drug development. In a word, fucoidan KW has the potential to be developed into a novel nasal drop or spray for influenza therapy and prophylaxis in the future.
Materials and Methods
The fucoidan KW extracted from Kjellmaniella crassifolia was provided by School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China. The NA proteins of subtype H1N1 (A/California/04/2009) (11058-VNAHC) and H3N2 (A/Babol/36/2005) (40017-VNAHC) were purchased from Sino Biological Inc. (Beijing, China). FITC-labeled lectins (concanavalin A (ConA), peanut agglutinin (PNA), ulex europaeus I (UEA-I), and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). FITC-labeled maackia amurensis agglutinin I (MAAI) was purchased from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA, USA). Ribavirin (50 mg/mL) was obtained from LuKang Cisen (Jining, China). Oseltamivir carboxylate was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Oseltamivir phosphate was obtained from Roche (Shanghai, China). Amantadine was purchased from Sigma (USA).
Cells and virus
MDCK cells were grown in RPM1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL of penicillin and 100 μg/ml of streptomycin. A549 cells were cultivated in F12 medium containing 10% FBS and 2 mM L-glutamine. Influenza virus PR8 was propagated in 10-day-old embryonated eggs for three days at 36.5 °C. Influenza H1N1 virus (A/Texas/15/2009; TX09), (A/California/04/2009; Cal09) and H3N2 virus (A/swine/Minnesota/02719/2009; Minnesota) were propagated in MDCK cells for three days at 37 °C. For infection, virus propagation solution was diluted in PBS containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and was added to cells at the indicated multiplicity of infection (MOI). Virus was allowed to adsorb 60 min at 37 °C. After removing the virus inoculum, cells were maintained in infecting media (RPM1640, 4 μg/ml trypsin) at 37 °C in 5% CO2.
Confluent cell monolayers in 6 well plates were incubated with 10-fold serial dilutions of IAV at 37 °C for 1 h. The inoculum was removed; cells were washed with PBS and overlaid with maintenance DMEM medium containing 1.5% agarose, 0.02% DEAE-dextran, 1 mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 1 μg/ml TPCK-treated trypsin. After incubation for 3 days at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, cells were fixed with 0.05% glutaraldehyde, followed by staining with 1% crystal violet in 20% ethanol for plaque counting.
Hemagglutination (HA) assay
The hemagglutination (HA) assay was performed as previously reported24,25. Standardized chicken red blood cell (cRBC) solutions were prepared according to the WHO manual. Virus propagation solutions were serially diluted 2-fold in round bottomed 96-well plate and 1% cRBCs were then added at an equal volume. After 60 min incubation at 4 °C, RBCs in negative wells sedimented and formed red buttons, whereas positive wells had an opaque appearance with no sedimentation. HA titers are given as hemagglutination units/mL (HAU/mL).
Cytopathic effect (CPE) inhibition assay
The cytopathic effect (CPE) inhibition assay was performed as described previously26,43. MDCK cells in 96-well plates were firstly infected with IAV (MOI = 0.1), and then treated with different compounds in triplicate after removal of the virus inoculum. After 48 h incubation, the cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature (RT). After removal of the formaldehyde, the cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 30 min. The plates were then washed and dried followed by solubilization of the dye with methanol, and the intensity of crystal violet staining for each well was measured at 570 nm. The concentration required for a test compound to reduce the CPE of IAV by 50% (IC50) was determined.
Time of addition study
MDCK cells were infected with Minnesota or PR8 (MOI = 0.1) under four different treatment conditions: pre-treatment of viruses, pre-treatment of cells, during virus adsorption, or after adsorption. (i) Pretreatment of virus: IAV was pretreated with 250 μg/mL of KW at 37 °C for 1 h before infection. (ii) Pretreatment of cells: MDCK cells were pretreated with 250 μg/mL of KW before infection. (iii) Adsorption: cells were infected in media containing 250 μg/mL of KW and, after 1 h adsorption at 37 °C, were overlaid with compound-free media. (iv) After adsorption: After 1 h adsorption at 37 °C, the inoculum was removed and the infecting media containing 250 μg/mL of KW were added to cells. At 24 h p.i., the antiviral activity was determined by HA assay. Mean percentage HA titers were calculated as a percentage of HA titers from untreated control group.
Confluent cells in 6 well plates were inoculated with PR8 virus for 2 h at 37 °C, and then treated with 250 μg/ml KW or 30 μM Zanamivir in post-adsorption medium for 24 h at 37 °C. Cells were scraped off and centrifuged at 1600 × g for 5 min. Medium was discarded and cells were incubated with ice-cold fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PBS buffer, pH 7.4) for 50 min, with gentle agitation. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 2 min at RT. Cell pellets were resuspended in 0.5 ml fixative solution then rinsed in 0.5 M cacodylate buffer twice for 10 min and post-fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide for 2 h. The fixed cells were washed with water twice for 10 min, dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol from 50 to 100% and embedded in spurr resin. Thin (70–80 nm) sections were cut on an ultramicrotome and counter stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The sections were viewed and photographed on a JEOL 1010 transmission electron microscope.
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay
SPR assays were conducted on a SPR biosensor instrument PlexArray® HT C100 (PLEXERA, USA). NA proteins (H1N1 or H3N2) were firstly immobilized onto the surface of a carboxymethylated dextran sensor chip (CM5) via amino group coupling as described previously31,32. To assess real-time binding of KW to the NA proteins on CM5 chips, KW sample with different concentrations (200, 100, 50, 25 nM) dissolved in PBS buffer, was injected over the sensor chip surface with NA immobilized within 3 min, followed by a 5-min wash with PBS buffer. The sensor chip surface was then regenerated by washing with phosphoric acid for 30 s. All binding experiments were carried out at 25 °C with a constant flow rate of 2 μl/s PBS buffer. To correct for non-specific binding and bulk refractive index change, a blank channel without NA was used and run simultaneously for each experiment. Then, the PLEXERA SPR Date Analysis Module (DAM) was used to calculate the kinetic parameters, and the changes in mass due to the binding response were recorded as resonance units (RU).
Indirect immunofluorescence assay
A549 cells were infected with PR8 virus (MOI = 3.0) with or without KW (250 μg/ml) pretreatment at 37 °C for 1 h, or were stimulated with EGF (100 ng/ml), each for 1 h at 4 °C and 30 min at 37 °C. Then cells were fixed, permeabilized, and incubated respectively with primary antibodies against IAV HA protein or cellular EGFR protein (Santa Cruz, USA) and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)- or Alexa Fluor 594- conjugated secondary antibodies (Boster, Wuhan, China), respectively. Then the cell nucleus was stained with DAPI for 20 min before confocal imaging. Finally, cells were washed and directly observed using Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope (Zeiss LSM 510, Jena, Germany).
Western blot assay
After drug treatment, the cell lysate was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. After being blocked in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.1% Tween 20 (v/v) and 5% BSA (w/v) at room temperature for 2 h, the membranes were rinsed and incubated at 4 °C overnight with anti-NP protein (Santa Cruz, USA), anti-phosphorylated NF-κB, Akt, EGFR, PKCα antibodies, or anti-β-actin and GAPDH antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA) as control. The membranes were washed and incubated with AP-labeled secondary antibody (1:2000 dilutions) at RT for 2 h. The protein bands were then visualized by incubating with the developing solution (p-nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (NBT) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate toluidine (BCIP)) at RT for 30 min. The relative densities of proteins were all determined by using ImageJ (NIH) v.1.33 u (USA).
In vivo experiments
Four-week-old female Kunming mice (average weight, 14.0 ± 2.0 g) were housed in polycarbonate cages in a room with controlled humidity and temperature. Fifty mice were randomly divided into five experimental groups (10 mice each). Mice were inoculated intranasally with PR8 (500 PFU/mouse) diluted in 40 μL of 1 × PBS under light anesthesia, and randomly divided into experimental groups. Two hours after inoculation, mice received intranasal therapy of either KW (10 or 20 μg/day), or placebo, and the treatments were repeated once daily for the entire experiment.
Four mice per group were weighed and euthanized on Day 4 after inoculation by spinal dislocation method, and lungs were removed and weighed. The lung specimens of animals from each experimental group were homogenized in 1 × PBS for determination of viral titers by plaque assay. Histopathological analysis was performed using H&E staining on samples collected on Day 4 as described previously44.
In the survival experiments, 10 mice per group were intranasally infected with PR8 (1000 PFU/mouse) at Day 0. In addition to the groups with intranasal treatment with KW (10 or 20 μg/day), a group of mice also received an oral dose of oseltamivir phosphate (20 mg/kg/day) as the positive control45. The drugs (KW or oseltamivir) administration was repeated once daily for seven days. Mice were monitored daily for weight loss and clinical signs. If a mouse lost body weight over 25% of its pre-infection weight, it was defined as dead and humanely euthanized; the rest of the mice were sacrificed at the end of experiment on 14 dpi.
All experiments involving animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Ocean University of China (OUCYY-2016001). All methods were performed in accordance with the animal ethics guidelines of the Chinese National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC).
All data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. Statistical significance was determined using the two-tailed unpaired t-test analysis and the variance analysis (ANOVA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
How to cite this article: Wang, W. et al. Inhibition of Influenza A Virus Infection by Fucoidan Targeting Viral Neuraminidase and Cellular EGFR Pathway. Sci. Rep. 7, 40760; doi: 10.1038/srep40760 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Palese, P. Influenza: old and new threats. Nat Med 10, S82–87 (2004).
Taubenberger, J. K. & Morens, D. M. 1918 influenza: the mother of all pandemics. Emerg Infect Dis 12, 15–22 (2006).
Krug, R. M. & Aramini, J. M. Emerging antiviral targets for influenza A virus. Trends Pharmacol Sci 30, 269–277 (2009).
Moscona, A. Neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza. N Engl J Med 353, 1363–1373 (2005).
Moscona, A. Global transmission of oseltamivir-resistant influenza. N Engl J Med 360, 953–956 (2009).
Hayden, F. G. & Pavia A. T. Antiviral management of seasonal and pandemic influenza. J Infect Dis 194, S119–126 (2006).
Lagoja, I. M. & De Clercq, E. Anti-influenza virus agents: synthesis and mode of action. Med Res Rev 28, 1–38 (2008).
Eierhoff, T., Hrincius, E. R., Rescher, U., Ludwig, S. & Ehrhardt, C. The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Promotes Uptake of Influenza A Viruses (IAV) into Host Cells. PLoS Pathog 6, e1001099 (2010).
Ohuchi, M., Asaoka, N., Sakai, T. & Ohuchi, R. Roles of neuraminidase in the initial stage of influenza virus infection. Microbes and Infect 8, 1287–1293 (2006).
Chandía, N. P. & Matsuhiro, B. Characterization of a fucoidan from Lessonia vadosa (Phaeophyta) and its anticoagulant and elicitor properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 42, 235–240 (2008).
Trinchero, J. et al. Antiretroviral activity of fucoidans extracted from the brown seaweed Adenocystis utricularis . Phytother Res 23, 707–712 (2009).
Feldman, S. C., Reynaldi, S., Stortz, C., Cerezo, A. S. & Damonte, E. B. Antiviral properties of fucoidan fractions from Leathesia difformis. Phytomedcine 6, 335–340 (1999).
Ponce, N. M. A. et al. Fucoidans from the brown seaweed Adenocystis utricularis: Extraction methods, antiviral activity and structural studies. Carbohydr Res 338, 153–165 (2003).
Baba, M., Snoeck, R., Pauwels, R. & de Clercq, E. Sulfated polysaccharides are potent and selective inhibitors of various enveloped viruses, including herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, vesicular stomatitis virus, and human immunodeficiency virus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 32, 1742–1745 (1988).
Alekseyenko, T. V. et al. Antitumor and antimetastatic activity of fucoidan, a sulfated polysaccharide isolated from the Okhotsk Sea Fucus evanescens brown alga. Bull Exp Biol Med 143, 730–732 (2007).
Cumashi, A. et al. A comparative study of the anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant, antiangiogenic, and antiadhesive activities of nine different fucoidans from brown seaweeds. Glycobiology 17, 541–552 (2007).
Fitton, J. H., Stringer, D. N. & Karpiniec, S. S. Therapies from Fucoidan: An Update. Mar. Drugs 13, 5920–5946 (2015).
Hayashi, K., Lee, J. B., Nakano, T. & Hayashi, T. Anti-influenza A virus characteristics of a fucoidan from sporophyll of Undaria pinnatifida in mice with normal and compromised immunity. Microbes Infect 15, 302–309 (2013).
Synytsya, A. et al. Mekabu fucoidan: structural complexity and defensive effects against avian influenza A viruses. Carbohydr Polym 111, 633–644 (2014).
Kim, S. Y. & Joo, H. G. Evaluation of adjuvant effects of fucoidan for improving vaccine efficacy. J Vet Sci 16(2), 145–150 (2015).
Wang, P. et al. Analysis of structural heterogeneity of fucoidan from Hizikia fusiforme by ES-CID-MS/MS. Carbohydr polymer 90, 602–607 (2012).
Dodgson, K. S. & Price, R. G. A note on the determination of the ester sulphate content of sulphated polysaccharides. Biochem J 84, 106–110 (1962).
Wu, J. D. et al. Structural study of sulfated fuco-oligosaccharide branched glucuronomannan from Kjellmaniella crassifolia by ESI-CID-MS/MS. J Carbohydr Chem 34, 303–317 (2015).
Wang, W. et al. Preparation and anti-influenza A virus activity of κ-carrageenan oligosaccharide and its sulphated derivatives. Food Chem 133, 880–888 (2012).
Sriwilaijaroen, N. et al. 6SLN-lipo PGA specifically catches (coats) human influenza virus and synergizes neuraminidase-targeting drugs for human influenza therapeutic potential. J Antimicrob Chemother 70, 2797–2809 (2015).
Wang, W. et al. In vitro inhibitory effect of carrageenan oligosaccharide on influenza A H1N1 virus. Antiviral Res 92, 237–246 (2011).
Hussain, S. et al. Strain-specific antiviral activity of iminosugars against human influenza A viruses. J Antimicrob Chemother 70, 136–152 (2015).
Alam, M. I. Investigation of the role of PKC-alpha for influenza A virus-induced signaling and of the inhibitory effect of Verapamil on virus replication. J Biol Chem 281, 16707–16715 (2006).
Hashem, A. M. et al. Aurintricarboxylic Acid Is a Potent Inhibitor of Influenza A and B Virus Neuraminidases. PLoS One 4, e8350 (2009).
Wetherall, N. T. et al. Evaluation of Neuraminidase Enzyme Assays Using Different Substrates to Measure Susceptibility of Influenza Virus Clinical Isolates to Neuraminidase Inhibitors: Report of the Neuraminidase Inhibitor Susceptibility Network. J Clin Microbiol 41, 742–750 (2003).
Miao, B. C. et al. Sulfated polymannuroguluronate, a novel anti-acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) drug candidate, targeting CD4 in lymphocytes. Biochem Pharmacol 68, 641–649 (2004).
Geng, M. Y. et al. The potential molecular targets of marine sulfated polymannuroguluronate interfering with HIV-1 entry. Interaction between SPMG and HIV-1 rgp120 and CD4 molecule. Antivir Res 59, 127–135 (2003).
Konig, R. et al. Human host factors required for influenza virus replication. Nature 463, 813–817 (2010).
Karlas, A. et al. Genome-wide RNAi screen identifies human host factors crucial for influenza virus replication. Nature 463, 818–822 (2010).
Kumar, N., Liang, Y. H., Parslow, T. G. & Liang, Y. Y. Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors block multiple steps of influenza A virus replication. J Virol 85, 2818–2827 (2011).
Kumar, N., Xin, Z. T., Liang, Y., Ly, H. & Liang, Y. NF-kappa B signaling differentially regulates influenza virus RNA synthesis. J Virol 82, 9880–9889 (2008).
Lee, N. Y. et al. Inhibitory effects of fucoidan on activation of epidermal growth factor receptor and cell transformation in JB6 Cl41 cells. Food Chem Toxicol 46, 1793–800 (2008).
Barnard, D. L. Animal models for the study of influenza pathogenesis and therapy. Antivir Res 82, A110–122 (2009).
Wang, W., Wang, S. X. & Guan, H. S. The Antiviral Activities and Mechanisms of Marine Polysaccharides: An Overview. Mar Drugs 10, 2795–2816 (2012).
Buck, C. B. et al. Carrageenan is a potent inhibitor of papillomavirus infection. PLoS Pathog 2, e69 (2006).
Laurienzo, P. Marine polysaccharides in pharmaceutical applications: An overview. Mar Drugs 8, 2435–2465 (2010).
Chiu, Y. H., Chan, Y. L., Tsai, L. W., Li, T. L. & Wu, C. J. Prevention of human enterovirus 71 infection by kappa carrageenan. Antivir Res 95, 128–134 (2012).
Leibbrandt, A. et al. Iota-Carrageenan Is a Potent Inhibitor of Influenza A Virus Infection. PLoS one 15, e14320 (2010).
Fukushi, M. et al. Serial Histopathological Examination of the Lungs of Mice Infected with Influenza A Virus PR8 Strain. PLoS One 6, e21207 (2011).
Smee, D. F., Wong, M. H., Bailey, K. W. & Sidwell, R. W. Activities of oseltamivir and ribavirin used alone and in combination against infections in mice with recent isolates of influenza A (H1N1) and B viruses. Antivir Chem Chemother 17, 185–192 (2006).
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31670811, 81302811 and 31500646), NSFC-Shandong Joint Fund (U1406402), National Key Technology R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology (2013BAB01B02), Taishan Scholar Project Special Funds, Shandong Province Science and Technology Major Projects (2015ZDJS04002), and the Promotive Research Fund for Excellent Young and Middle-aged Scientists of Shandong Province (BS2015YY040). We thank Dr. David Steinhauer from Emory University School of Medicine for providing influenza H1N1 virus (A/Texas/15/2009; TX09), (A/California/04/2009; Cal09) and H3N2 virus (A/swine/Minnesota/02719/2009; Minnesota); Drs. Xin Qi and Yunzhang Liu from School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, for their excellent technical assistance.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, W., Wu, J., Zhang, X. et al. Inhibition of Influenza A Virus Infection by Fucoidan Targeting Viral Neuraminidase and Cellular EGFR Pathway. Sci Rep 7, 40760 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40760
Marine Drugs (2020)
Marine Drugs (2020)
A network pharmacology-based strategy deciphers the multitarget pharmacological mechanism of Reduning injection in the treatment of influenza
European Journal of Integrative Medicine (2020)
Fucoidan from sea cucumber Holothuria polii: Structural elucidation and stimulation of hematopoietic activity
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (2020)
The Comparative Analysis of Antiviral Activity of Native and Modified Fucoidans from Brown Algae Fucus evanescens In Vitro and In Vivo
Marine Drugs (2020)