Article | Open | Published:

Whole organ and islet of Langerhans dosimetry for calculation of absorbed doses resulting from imaging with radiolabeled exendin

Scientific Reports volume 7, Article number: 39800 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Radiolabeled exendin is used for non-invasive quantification of beta cells in the islets of Langerhans in vivo. High accumulation of radiolabeled exendin in the islets raised concerns about possible radiation-induced damage to these islets in man. In this work, islet absorbed doses resulting from exendin-imaging were calculated by combining whole organ dosimetry with small scale dosimetry for the islets. Our model contains the tissues with high accumulation of radiolabeled exendin: kidneys, pancreas and islets. As input for the model, data from a clinical study (radiolabeled exendin distribution in the human body) and from a preclinical study with Biobreeding Diabetes Prone (BBDP) rats (islet-to-exocrine uptake ratio, beta cell mass) were used. We simulated 111In-exendin and 68Ga-exendin absorbed doses in patients with differences in gender, islet size, beta cell mass and radiopharmaceutical uptake in the kidneys. In all simulated cases the islet absorbed dose was small, maximum 1.38 mGy for 68Ga and 66.0 mGy for 111In. The two sources mainly contributing to the islet absorbed dose are the kidneys (33–61%) and the islet self-dose (7.5–57%). In conclusion, all islet absorbed doses are low (<70 mGy), so even repeated imaging will hardly increase the risk on diabetes.

Introduction

The beta cells in the islets of Langerhans in the pancreas produce insulin and play a key role in maintaining blood glucose levels within a normal range. In diabetes, the glucose homeostasis is disturbed by different underlying pathologies, resulting in insufficient beta cell function and/or mass. Until recently, the relation between beta cell mass (BCM) and beta cell function could not be investigated in vivo in humans due to the lack of a method to measure the BCM non-invasively.

Therefore, there is a major need for non-invasive determination of BCM in patients with diabetes1, and people at risk of diabetes. Such a method could also provide more insight in the relation between BCM and function in healthy volunteers as compared to a population at risk or with diabetes. In the last couple of years various radiolabeled tracers have been developed for BCM quantification by PET and SPECT and evaluated in preclinical studies2 with the first tracers now being tested in clinical trials3,4,5. One promising tracer for beta cell quantification is radiolabeled exendin, which binds specifically to the beta cells6 via the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor and is internalized upon receptor binding3. This internalization and subsequent “metabolic trapping” of the tracer, labeled with a radiometal3, leads to high target-to-background ratios.

The beta cells are the main cell type in the islets of Langerhans (~80% of the cells)7, and are assumed to be homogenously distributed within the islets in human8. Besides beta cells, the islets of Langerhans consist of alpha, delta and pp cells. The islets of Langerhans are approximately spherical structures with diameters between 50 and 400 μm. The different cells types within the islets are of vital importance for maintaining glucose homeostasis and the accumulation of radioactivity leads to concerns about possible radiation-induced damage to the islets, especially after repeated radiotracer administration. To ensure imaging without damaging the islets, a method to calculate the islet absorbed dose is required.

Until now, no suitable model has been available to calculate absorbed dose in the islets. Some attempts have been made using whole organ-based dosimetry to calculate average whole body and pancreas absorbed doses when using radiolabeled exendin9,10,11,12. Mikkola et al.9 used the rat biodistribution of NODAGA-exendin, labeled with 64Cu or with 68Ga to estimate human whole body absorbed doses with OLINDA/EXM13. In a similar way, Wild et al.10 used the biodistribution in Rip1Tag2 mice for three different exendin radiopeptides (labeled with 68Ga, 111In or 99mTc) to calculate the total body and pancreas dose. Recently, Selvaraju et al.12 calculated organ absorbed doses after administration of 68Ga-exendin in different animal species and humans. In all studies the pancreas absorbed dose was calculated assuming a homogenous radioactivity distribution in the pancreas. However, only 1–2% of the pancreatic tissue consists of islets and the activity concentration in an islet is much higher than in exocrine tissue3,9. Therefore, the absorbed dose in the islets is expected to be higher than in the exocrine tissue, which is not reflected by the models used so far, although acknowledged by Velikyan et al.11. Therefore, the islets should be included as a separate compartment in the islet absorbed dose calculation.

In this work, whole organ and small scale (μm-level) dosimetry was combined to calculate the islet absorbed dose after administration of radiolabeled exendin. In a previous clinical study, high accumulation of radiolabeled exendin in the pancreas and the kidneys was observed, while the radioactivity concentration in the remainder of the body was negligible3. Therefore, the kidneys and pancreas were used as source organs in the organ level dosimetry part of the model and the remainder of the body was not included. To complete the model, small scale dosimetry of the islets was included.

The islet self-dose was calculated using Monte Carlo based small scale dosimetry using the MCNP code14, whereas the absorbed doses due to kidneys and pancreas were calculated using S-values obtained from the OLINDA/EXM11 software. OLINDA/EXM is a software program which can be used to obtain organ S-values or calculate organ absorbed doses after administration of radiopharmaceuticals. An S-value describes the contribution of the activity in one organ (source) to the dose in another organ (target). Accurate dose calculations require detailed information about the tracer distribution not only for different organs but also within specific organs. Therefore, not only organ based data on tracer distribution from a clinical study but also specific information on the tracer uptake in exocrine tissue and islets within the pancreas retrieved from preclinical data, were used as input for the model.

Finally, the model was applied to estimate islet absorbed doses and to investigate the effect of different radionuclides (111In or 68Ga) and different biological factors (male or female, low or high kidney uptake, small or large islets, healthy or diabetic subjects) on the absorbed dose in the islets.

Methods

Dosimetry model

The absorbed dose in one islet is the sum of absorbed doses originating from different sources. When source and target are the same, the resulting absorbed dose is called self-dose. Figure 1 shows the sources that contribute to the islet absorbed dose and the assumptions made in our model. We assume that (I) all islets are homogeneously distributed through the pancreas and that (II) the surrounding islets and the exocrine tissue contribute to the islet absorbed dose as one source with a uniform distribution. This is defined as the self-dose of the pancreas.

Figure 1: The different sources that contribute to the islet absorbed dose and the assumptions made in the model.
Figure 1

Under the assumption of homogenous distribution of the islets through the pancreas, the contribution of the surrounding islets and exocrine pancreas is combined in the self-dose of the pancreas (1). Based on previous observations the activity in the remainder of the body is neglected (2).

Using these assumptions, the islet absorbed dose (Dislet) is given by:

where S-values describe the contribution of activity of one tissue (source) to the absorbed dose in another tissue (target), τ is the time integrated activity coefficient and A0 the administered activity. For the use of S-values, it is assumed that activity is homogeneously distributed in the source and the absorbed dose is uniform in each target organ12. This also holds for the calculation of the islet self-dose, where the islets are considered as spheres of homogeneously distributed activity. The total islet absorbed dose is slightly overestimated, since it is a combination of the islet self-dose and the pancreas self-dose, as the islet for which the islet absorbed dose is calculated is also part of the pancreas.

Model calculations were performed using an administered activity of 150 MBq for 111In, and 75 MBq for 68Ga (because of the higher sensitivity of PET imaging with 68Ga compared to SPECT imaging with 111In).

Each following section describes the contribution of one source (kidneys, pancreas and islet) to the islet absorbed dose. For each source we describe in which way S-values and time integrated activity coefficients were obtained and which assumptions were made.

Kidneys

The average absorbed dose in the islets originating from the kidneys is equal to the average dose to the pancreas originating from the kidneys under the assumption of equal absorption of photons, in both islets and exocrine tissue, the absorption of electrons is neglected due to their short range in tissue. Using this assumption, the islet absorbed dose due to the activity in the kidneys can be estimated using the S-values for the pancreas absorbed dose due to the kidneys (Spancreas←kidneys). S-values for an adult male and an adult female, for 111In and 68Ga (see supplementary material, Table 1) were taken from OLINDA/EXM, and are based on Monte Carlo simulations15,16.

Table 1: Details and results of the examples.

The time integrated activity coefficient of the kidneys was based on planar scintigraphic images, both anterior and posterior from a previous clinical study (clinical trial number: NCT01825148). The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Radboud University Medical Center, written informed consent was obtained from all participants and the study was carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. In the present dosimetry study, scintigrams of five healthy volunteers (2 male, 3 female, average age: 33.2 ± 13.6 years) acquired 0, 4, 24, 48, 96 and 168 h after injection of 150 MBq 111In-exendin-4 were used for calculation of the time integrated activity coefficient of the kidneys for each volunteer. The amount of activity in the kidneys at the different time points and the time integrated activity coefficients for 111In were calculated with SPRIND-software17. For calculation of the 68Ga time integrated activity coefficients, also the 111In scintigrams were used, but the activity in the kidneys was corrected for the shorter half-life, assuming similar biological behavior for 111In-exendin and 68Ga-exendin.

In the islet dosimetry model the average time integrated activity coefficient of these five volunteers was used as input. For simulation of humans with “high” or “low” kidney uptake, the maximum and minimum time integrated activity coefficient of these five volunteers was used, respectively.

Self- dose pancreas

Within the pancreas, the activity in the exocrine part and in islets contributes to the islet absorbed dose. The S-values for the pancreas self-dose (Spancreas←pancreas) were also taken from OLINDA/EXM for an adult male and adult female, for 111In and 68Ga. (see supplementary material, Table 1).

Since no human data is available on the specific accumulation of 111In-exendin in islets and in exocrine tissue an alternative approach using preclinical data was set up to calculate the contribution of the exocrine pancreas and the contribution of the islets to the islet absorbed dose. The animal experiments were approved by the animal welfare committee of the Radboud University Nijmegen and the study was carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Nine female Biobreeding Diabetes Prone (BBDP) rats (5–7 weeks old) (Biomedical Research Models, Worchester, MA, USA), were euthanized two hours post injection (p.i.) of 18.5 ± 1.78 MBq 111In-exendin (peptide dose 20 pmol). Pancreata were dissected and activity in the pancreas for each rat was measured in a gamma counter (Wallac 1480 wizard, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA), 2 weeks p.i. The pancreata were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin and sliced into 4 μm sections for autoradiography and histological evaluation.

For autoradiography, a phosphor imaging plate was exposed to tissue sections of the pancreas (n=3 per rat) for 7 days and developed using a radioluminography laser imager (Fuji Film BAS 1800 II system, Raytest, Straubenhardt, Germany), exported from AIDA software (Raytest) and further processed in MATLAB (version R2011a, The MathWorks, Inc., USA). The same sections were stained for the presence of insulin and the total pancreatic area and the area of the insulin positive islets were determined as described previously3. Mask images of these delineated islets and of the total pancreatic area were created and saved. In MATLAB, autoradiography images and their corresponding histological sections were scaled and rotated to ensure optimal registration of the islets in both images. For each tissue section, the islet fraction was calculated by dividing the insulin positive area (islet mask) by the total pancreatic area (tissue mask). Furthermore the average activity outside the tissue, so called background (e.g. due to cosmic radiation) and the average activity in the exocrine tissue were calculated by selecting three regions outside the tissue (Fig. 2A,B). For each tissue section the pixel values in the autoradiography images, representing the activity concentration in the exocrine tissue were corrected for the background.

Figure 2
Figure 2

The autoradiography image of supplementary Figure 1 with respectively masks (in black) of: (A) pancreatic tissue, (B) dilated islets and background and (C) islets. (D) is a magnification of (C) and demonstrates the projection of islet activity outside the islets, so called spill-over. (E) visualizes how dilation of the delineated islets (black mask) enables inclusion of all activity originating from the islets, as no spill-over is visible.

Figure 2C and D show that in the autoradiography images, activity originating from the islets is also projected in the surrounding of the islets. This spill-over is caused by the distance between the tissue section and the phosphor imaging plate. Delineated islets were dilated (Fig. 2E), to include spill-over originating from the islets in the calculation of the ratio between tracer uptake in the islets and in exocrine tissue. The activity in the dilated part (Fig. 2E) was corrected for exocrine tissue activity, and included in the calculated islet pixel value. Finally, the average uptake ratio per pixel between islet and exocrine tissue (each section separately) can be calculated.

To calculate time integrate activity coefficients for each rat pancreas (exocrine tissue and islets), the fraction of injected activity in each rat pancreas was used. With this time integrated activity coefficient for each rat pancreas, the average uptake ratio per pixel and the islet fraction, the islet and exocrine time integrated activity coefficients can be calculated. Finally these time integrated activity coefficients were translated to human time integrated activity coefficients using the method described by Kirschner et al.18. A more extensive description of the calculation of the pancreas self-dose is given in the supplementary material.

For calculation of the 68Ga time integrated activity coefficients, the activity in the pancreas was corrected for the shorter half-life, assuming similar biological behavior for 111In-exendin and 68Ga-exendin in the pancreas in rats, and the same translation to human.

Self-dose islets

Assuming islet sphericity, the sphere model19 as used in OLINDA/EXM would be suitable for calculation of the islet self-dose, unfortunately the smallest sphere in OLINDA/EXM (diameter: 0.13 cm)19 is much larger than the typical islet size (diameter: 50–400 μm). For calculation of S-values for 111In and 68Ga in spheres with sizes that cover the range of the islet sizes, new Monte Carlo simulations using the MCNP code14 were performed. The methods for these Monte Carlo simulations were described previously19, although for the present calculations only MCNP code was used and the comparison with results calculated with the EGS4 code was skipped. For the Auger electrons with energy <1 keV complete local absorption was assumed. For the electrons with energy >1 keV and for photons, Monte Carlo simulations were performed for spheres with diameters of 50, 100, 200 and 400 μm (see supplementary material, Table 2), which covers the typical range of the islet sizes. For each electron, positron and gamma spectrum from the MIRD-07 database for 68Ga and 111In, 10 million initial particles were used as input, the energy cut-off was set at 1 keV and the ITS 3.0 electron energy loss straggling algorithm was set (DBCN 17j 2)20. The density and elemental composition of the pancreas was according to ICRU report 4421, the beta cells were modelled according to soft tissue (male) in the same report.

Table 2: Characteristics of 111In and 68Ga.

Calculation of the time integrated activity coefficient for the islet was performed as described in self-dose pancreas.

Use of the model

To demonstrate the application of the model, several examples are described. Islet absorbed doses were calculated for healthy male (I), healthy female (II), male with a high or low kidney uptake (III), male with small or large islets (IV) and diabetic male (V). Islet absorbed doses were calculated for both 111In and 68Ga (details about the model input for the different examples are given in Table 1).

Results

Results for the examples specified above, are given in Table 1. Here, we describe the main results.

The use of 68Ga instead of 111In will result in a much lower islet absorbed dose

The use of 68Ga instead of 111In will result in only an islet absorbed dose 0.99 mGy compared to 46.2 mGy (Table 1, example 1). The relative contribution of the islet self-dose to the total islet absorbed dose is smaller for 68Ga than for 111In (13% versus 39% of the total islet dose), whereas the relative contribution of the kidneys to the islet absorbed dose is in the same range for 111In and 68Ga (53% and 46%).

The islet absorbed dose is higher for females than for males

Calculation of the islet absorbed dose for males and females resulted in higher absorbed dose for females (57.6 versus 46.2 mGy for 111In and 1.21 versus 0.99 mGy for 68Ga (Table 1, example 1 and 2)). Although the absolute absorbed dose is higher for females, the relative contribution of all sources is similar.

The kidney uptake has a substantial effect on the islet absorbed dose

The islet absorbed dose in a subject with a high kidney uptake was approximately 15–30% higher than in a subject with low kidney uptake (40.0 mGy and 51.1 mGy for 111In and 0.92 mGy and 1.07 mGy for 68Ga (Table 1, example 3)). This difference in total islet absorbed dose is only a result of the difference in kidney time integrated activity.

Islet absorbed dose largely depends on islet size

The islet absorbed dose was calculated for both small (50 μm) and large (400 μm) islets. For 111In the islet self-dose was 15.4 mGy for islets with a diameter of 50 μm and 37.9 mGy for islets with a diameter of 400 μm (Table 1). The 68Ga islet self-dose was 0.07 mGy for 50 μm islets and 0.51 mGy for 400 μm diameter (Table 1, example 4). For the large islets this results in a high relative contribution of the islet self-dose to the total islet absorbed dose (57% for 111In and 37% for 68Ga). Compared to 50 μm diameter islets, the total islet absorbed dose in 400 μm islets is increased by 52% for 111In and by 48% for 68Ga.

The absorbed islet dose is slightly lower in diabetic subjects compared to healthy subjects

To simulate diabetic patients, meaning patients with a decreased BCM, the percentage islets in the pancreas was reduced from 2% to 0.2%. This strongly influenced the self-dose of the pancreas: for 111In in male the self-dose drops from 3.68 mGy to 1.51 mGy and for 68Ga from 0.40 mGy to 0.16 mGy (Table 1, example 1 and 5). The relative contribution of the whole pancreas to the total islet absorbed dose decreases from 8% in a healthy male to 3% in diabetic male for 111In and from 40% to 21% in 68Ga.

Discussion

Up to now, the islet absorbed doses as reported in the literature were based on the mean absorbed dose in the whole pancreas and this could lead to an underestimation of potential islet damage resulting from the use of specific radiolabeled tracer molecules for beta cell imaging such as exendin. We have developed a model to calculate islet absorbed doses. The S-values as implemented in OLINDA/EXM were used to calculate the contribution of the kidneys and pancreas to the islet absorbed dose and small scale dosimetry was used to calculate the islet self-dose. The current model can simulate patients with differences in gender, islet size, percentage of islets in the pancreas and kidney uptake for tailoring the dosimetry to healthy subjects as well as patients with diabetes (thus with a lower percentage of islets).

In all our examples, substantial contribution of the activity in the islet itself to the total islet absorbed dose was found (with the maximum contribution in large islets, for 111In 57%, and for 68Ga 37%). Therefore, the specific accumulation of activity in the islets should be included in the islet absorbed dose calculation. The larger contribution of the islet self-dose for 111In compared to 68Ga (both absolute and in terms of percentage) to the total islet absorbed dose can be explained by the longer half-life of 111In, but is also a result of the short range of the conversion electrons of 111In (Table 2).

The islet self-dose for 111In is more than twice as high in 400 μm islets than in 50 μm islets. The increase in islet self-dose is even more pronounced for 68Ga, where the islet self-dose is more than 700% higher in large islets than in small islets. This higher islet self-dose in large islets, for both 111In and 68Ga. results in an increase in total islet absorbed dose of approximately 50%.

In the study of Wild et al.10 the islets were not included as a separate source and pancreas absorbed doses were calculated for 111In-exendin and 68Ga-exendin from mice data, resulting in a pancreas dose of 0.7 mGy/MBq for 111In-exendin and 0.2 mGy/MBq for 68Ga-exendin. Selvaraju et al.12 also calculated pancreas absorbed doses for 68Ga-exendin but in different species and found pancreas absorbed doses between 0.01 and 0.10 mGy/MBq. Inclusion of the islet self-dose in their models would have led to substantially higher islet absorbed doses than their reported average pancreas absorbed doses, because in our study the islet self-dose contributes up to 57% to the total islet absorbed dose.

The higher islet absorbed dose found in human female compared to male is a result of conversion of the rat time integrated activity coefficients to human (total body weight male 70.0 kg, female 56.9 kg) and the different S-values, due to a different distance between the organs in the standard male and female phantoms15,16.

The five calculated examples showed that the contribution of the activity in the kidneys to the total islet absorbed dose is relevant, ranging from 33% for 400 μm islets in healthy males administered with 68Ga exendin, to even 60% in diabetic males administered with 68Ga-exendin (100 μm diameter islets). Therefore, reducing kidney uptake (e.g. with gelofusine24) is expected to not only increase image quality by increasing the pancreas to kidney activity concentration ratio, but would also lower the islet absorbed dose.

In all examples for which we calculated the islet absorbed dose, the islet absorbed dose was very low (maximum 66.0 mGy for 111In and 1.38 mGy for 68Ga), hardly increasing the risk on diabetes as a result of radiation25. Our calculations also demonstrate that in order to minimize islet absorbed doses, the use of 68Ga-exendin is preferred over 111In-exendin.

In the future, the model could be refined by separating the pancreas into different compartments. In the current model an average islet absorbed dose is calculated, while the actual islet absorbed dose might for example be higher for islets in close proximity of the kidneys, compared to islets further away from the kidneys. By separating the pancreas into different compartments, islet absorbed doses for separate areas could be calculated. However, to obtain S-values for these compartments in relation to the kidneys and to each other new Monte Carlo simulations are required. Separation of the pancreas in different compartments would also enable simulation of inhomogeneous islet densities within the pancreas, as seen in humans22.

In future research the sub-cellular distribution of the radiolabeled exendin should also be taken into account as radiolabeled exendin is internalized in the cells and this could have an effect on the potential cytotoxic effect especially for Auger emitting radionuclides. Several studies on sub-cellular distribution of Auger emitting radionuclides show a significant influence of this sub-cellular distribution on the nucleus absorbed dose26,27,28. Especially if the Auger emitting radionuclide is taken up in the nucleus an increased nucleus absorbed dose is observed with potentially an increased cytotoxic effect on the cells. However, if the radionuclide is not taken up in the nucleus, but only in the cytoplasm and cell surface the average absorbed cell dose would overestimate the nucleus absorbed dose27. It is currently not known if radiolabeled exendin is taken up in the cell nucleus. Uptake of the radiolabeled exendin in the nucleus would increase the nucleus absorbed dose for 111In-exendin, due to the short range (0.25–16 nm) of the most abundant Auger electrons (8.5 and 350 eV) and thereby the potential cytotoxic effect. However, when there is no uptake in the cell nucleus no enhanced nucleus absorbed dose and therefore cytotoxic effect is expected. To be able to accurately calculate this nucleus absorbed dose, more research on the sub-cellular radiolabeled exendin distribution is necessary.

Here, we have successfully combined human planar images, rat biodistribution data and ex vivo autoradiography to calculate the absorbed dose at islet level. The low maximum calculated islet dose (maximum 66 mGy) indicates that even repeated exendin imaging will hardly increase the risk on diabetes25. Our data reveal that inclusion of the islet self-dose substantially contributes (up to 57%) to the islet absorbed dose, confirming that the islet self-dose should be included in the dose calculation.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: van der Kroon, I. et al. Whole organ and islet of Langerhans dosimetry for calculation of absorbed doses resulting from imaging with radiolabeled exendin. Sci. Rep. 7, 39800; doi: 10.1038/srep39800 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Beta cell imaging - a key tool in optimized diabetes prevention and treatment. Trends Endocrinol Metab 25, 375–377, doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2014.02.002 (2014).

  2. 2.

    Inside the pancreas: progress and challenges of human beta cell mass quantification. Diabetologia 57, 856–859, doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3206-z (2014).

  3. 3.

    et al. Non-invasive quantification of the beta cell mass by SPECT with 111In-labelled exendin. Diabetologia 57, 950–959, doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3166-3 (2014).

  4. 4.

    et al. Positron emission tomography ligand [11C]5-hydroxy-tryptophan can be used as a surrogate marker for the human endocrine pancreas. Diabetes 63, 3428–3437, doi: 10.2337/db13-1877 (2014).

  5. 5.

    et al. In vivo imaging of endogenous pancreatic beta-cell mass in healthy and type 1 diabetic subjects using 18F-fluoropropyl-dihydrotetrabenazine and PET. J Nucl Med 53, 908–916, doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.100545 (2012).

  6. 6.

    , , , & (111) In-exendin uptake in the pancreas correlates with the beta-cell mass and not with the alpha-cell mass. Diabetes 64, 1324–1328, doi: 10.2337/db14-1212 (2015).

  7. 7.

    et al. Islet architecture: A comparative study. Islets 1, 129–136, doi: 10.4161/isl.1.2.9480 (2009).

  8. 8.

    et al. Assessment of human pancreatic islet architecture and composition by laser scanning confocal microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 53, 1087–1097, doi: 10.1369/jhc.5C6684.2005 (2005).

  9. 9.

    et al. 64Cu- and 68Ga-labelled [Nle(14), Lys(40)(Ahx-NODAGA)NH2]-exendin-4 for pancreatic beta cell imaging in rats. Mol Imaging Biol 16, 255–263, doi: 10.1007/s11307-013-0691-2 (2014).

  10. 10.

    et al. Exendin-4-Based Radiopharmaceuticals for Glucagonlike Peptide-1 Receptor PET/CT and SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med 51, 1059–1067, doi: DOI 10.2967/jnumed.110.074914 (2010).

  11. 11.

    et al. Dosimetry of [(177)Lu]-DO3A-VS-Cys(40)-Exendin-4 - impact on the feasibility of insulinoma internal radiotherapy. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 5, 109–126 (2015).

  12. 12.

    et al. Dosimetry of [(68)Ga]Ga-DO3A-VS-Cys(40)-Exendin-4 in rodents, pigs, non-human primates and human - repeated scanning in human is possible. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 5, 259–269 (2015).

  13. 13.

    , & OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med 46, 1023–1027, doi: 46/6/1023 [pii] (2005).

  14. 14.

    MCNP - A general Monte Carlo N-Particle transport code. (5th ed.) (Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory 2003).

  15. 15.

    & Specific absorbed fractions of energy at various ages from internal photon sources. V. Fifteen-year-old male and adult female. ORNUTM-8381 A/5, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN (1987).

  16. 16.

    et al. Mathematical models and specific absorbed fractions of photon energy in the nonpregnant adult female and at the end of each trimester of pregnancy. (Oak Ridge National Lab., TN United States, 1995).

  17. 17.

    et al. Software package for integrated data processing for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine (SPRIND). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34, 413–421, doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0226-z (2007).

  18. 18.

    , & Radiation-Dosimetry of I-131-19-Iodocholesterol - Pitfalls of Using Tissue Concentration Data - Reply. J Nucl Med 16, 248–249 (1975).

  19. 19.

    & Re-evaluation of absorbed fractions for photons and electrons in spheres of various sizes. J Nucl Med 41, 149–160 (2000).

  20. 20.

    & MIRD: Radionuclide Data and Decay Schemes. 1st edn, (Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2008).

  21. 21.

    Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. 189 (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 1989).

  22. 22.

    et al. Regional differences in islet distribution in the human pancreas–preferential beta-cell loss in the head region in patients with type 2 diabetes. PLoS One 8, e67454, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067454 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Radiation spectra for Auger-electron emitting radionuclides: report No. 2 of AAPM Nuclear Medicine Task Group No. 6. Med. Phys. 19, 1371–1383 (1992).

  24. 24.

    et al. Reducing renal uptake of radiolabeled peptides using albumin fragments. J Nucl Med 49, 1506–1511, doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.053249 (2008).

  25. 25.

    et al. Radiation dose to the pancreas and risk of diabetes mellitus in childhood cancer survivors: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 13, 1002–1010, doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70323-6 (2012).

  26. 26.

    , , , & MIRD Cellular S Values (Reston, VA: Society of Nuclear Medicine, 1997).

  27. 27.

    , , & Monte Carlo single-cell dosimetry of Auger-electron emitting radionuclides. Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 2555–2572 (2010).

  28. 28.

    , & Dosimetry at the sub-cellular scale of Auger-electron emitter 99mTc in a mouse single thyroid follicle. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 108, 58–63 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Desiree Bos and Hanneke Peeters for their excellent work in the animal experiments, staining and scanning of the slides and delineation of the islets. This project has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement n° 222980 (BetaImage) and n° 602812 (BetaCure), the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF), JDRF file number 37–2011–635, NIH grant 1R01 AG 030328-01 and The Institute of Genetic and Metabolic Disease, Radboud University Nijmegen. Institute of Genetic and Metabolic Disease, Radboud University Nijmegen, European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme, grant agreements n° 222980 (BetaImage) and n° 602812 (BetaCure), the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF), JDRF file number 37-2011-635, NIH grant 1R01 AG 030328-01.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands

    • Inge van der Kroon
    • , Wietske Woliner-van der Weg
    • , Maarten Brom
    • , Lieke Joosten
    • , Cathelijne Frielink
    • , Eric P. Visser
    •  & Martin Gotthardt
  2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

    • Mark W. Konijnenberg

Authors

  1. Search for Inge van der Kroon in:

  2. Search for Wietske Woliner-van der Weg in:

  3. Search for Maarten Brom in:

  4. Search for Lieke Joosten in:

  5. Search for Cathelijne Frielink in:

  6. Search for Mark W. Konijnenberg in:

  7. Search for Eric P. Visser in:

  8. Search for Martin Gotthardt in:

Contributions

I.K., W.W. contributed in the design of the study, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. L.J. and C.F. performed the experiments and M.K. performed the Monte Carlo simulations. M.B., E.V. and M.G. contributed to the discussion and in the design of the study. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inge van der Kroon.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39800

Rights and permissions

Creative Commons BYThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.