Article | Open | Published:

Adsorption of phosphate in water using one-step synthesized zirconium-loaded reduced graphene oxide

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 39108 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

In this account, a one-step green hydrothermal method for zirconium-loaded reduced graphene oxide (RGO-Zr) adsorbent was developed in pure water. It is based on the formation of initially strong-coupling RGO-Zr nanocomposites followed by in situ reduction of GO to RGO during the hydrothermal treatment. The phosphate adsorption performance of the as-prepared nanocomposites was investigated in aqueous environment under various conditions. The characterization results of RGO-Zr nanocomposites showed that ZrO2 was successfully integrated onto the RGO sheets in amorphous. The data from equilibrium phosphate adsorption on RGO-Zr revealed that the adsorption kinetics followed a pseudo-second-order kinetic model, where the adsorption isotherm fitted the Langmuir isotherm model with a maximum adsorption capacity of 27.71 mg P/g at pH 5 and 298 K. The improved phosphate adsorption on RGO-Zr was caused by the dispersion of ZrO2 on the RGO surface. Furthermore, the phosphate adsorption was found insensitive to the increase in pH while it was sensitive to the increase in temperature. The coexisting anions of SO42−, F, Cl, NO3− and CO32− affected the phosphate adsorption in a different way. Results suggest that the present RGO-Zr adsorbent has the potential for controlling phosphorus pollution in water.

Introduction

Water eutrophication could lead to several harmful effects, including the destruction of the aquatic life, deterioration of water quality, and even have a hazardous influence on humans1,2. As a result, removal of excessive phosphorus is important for controlling water eutrophication. A number of methods and techniques have been developed for phosphorus removal, including chemical precipitation, adsorption, and biological treatments3,4,5. Among these available methods, chemical precipitation (with aluminum, iron and calcium salts) caused sludge handling, where the biological treatments were found unsuitable for removal of low phosphate concentrations from the water. The sorption-based methods, however, were demonstrated to be more effective for several advantages, such as low cost, simple operating conditions, stable phosphate removal efficiency, and produce little sludge6,7,8. Recently, the application of low-cost and abundant natural or synthetic materials for phosphate removal has extensively been investigated, including modified bentonites9, waste alum sludge10, and steel slags11.

Nowadays, zirconium based oxides are widely employed for removal of phosphate from water for their chemical stability, non-toxicity, insolubility, resistance to oxidant agents1,6, and amphoteric character (containing cationic and anionic ion exchange)12. Some studies have focused on the modification of adsorbents like ZrO213, amorphous zirconium oxide nanoparticles6, and amorphous zirconium hydroxide12. Others have loaded zirconium based oxides on different materials or metals, such as zirconium-modified zeolites1, Fe-Zr binary oxides14, zirconium (IV) loaded fibrous adsorbent4, zirconia-functionalized graphite oxide7, and zirconia-functionalized SBA-1515. Although the zirconium based materials have been shown to have a great performance for removal of phosphate, some of them were ultrafine powders or particulates that are hard to separate from the solution. To overcome the problem, the powders required immobilization on suitable substrates.

Carbonaceous based materials, such as activated carbon (AC), carbon nanotubes, porous carbon and graphene oxide, have attracted tremendous interests due to their superior properties, including chemical stability, large specific surface area, abundant pore size distribution, and feasibility for mass production1,16. Graphene oxide (GO) has a stable layered structure with various oxygen-containing functional groups like hydroxyl, carbonyl, epoxy and carboxylic fragments attached directly to the carbons or at the layers edges17,18. This results in versatile modified surfaces7,18. The presence of these various oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface of Graphene oxide (GO) or reduced graphene oxide (RGO) can form complexes with metal ions, such as hydrated zirconium oxide19, titanium dioxide20, iron oxides21, and aluminum oxides22. Additionally, GO can be obtained from cheap natural graphite in large quantities and RGO can be collected through reduced processes of GO.

In order to benefit from the advantages of both GO/RGO and zirconium based oxides, a new composite adsorbent was synthesized and characterized. Zong et al.7 have previously prepared a zirconia-functionalized graphite oxide absorbent, where the composite showed good performance for removal of phosphate. However, toxic anhydrous toluene was used during the synthesis and the reaction was conducted under N2 atmosphere, which made the synthetic method more complex and harmful. Therefore, developing alternative green and facile methods is highly desirable. A recent study has reported the successful combination of TiO2 onto RGO by hydrothermal method with improved photocatalytic performance of TiO220. Hence, the feasibility of applying the hydrothermal method for combination of GO with zirconium-based oxide was investigated in search for novel absorbents.

The objectives of the present paper are: (i) assessment of the practicability of the one-step hydrothermal method in synthesis of zirconium-loaded reduced graphene oxide material, (ii) characterization of the newly prepared materials, (iii) investigation of the adsorption ability of the composite towards phosphate, and (iv) evaluation of several influencing parameters on the phosphate adsorption characteristics, including initial concentrations of phosphate, contact time, pH, temperature, and coexisting anions.

Methods and Materials

Synthesis of RGO-Zr

Graphene oxide (GO) was synthesized using a modified Hummers method7,23. The RGO-Zr (in which Zr is representing zirconium oxides) nanocomposite was obtained through a one-step hydrothermal method. Briefly, a calculated amount of zirconium isopropoxide (Zr(OC3H7)4, Aldrich, 99.99%, 0.065–0.65 g) and GO powder (0.065 g) were added into 30 mL de-ionized water (DI-water 18.2 MΩ/cm; Sartorius Stedim). The mass ratios of GO and zirconium isopropoxide were varied from 1:1 to 1:10 in search for optimized materials. After an ultrasonic dissolution for 0.5 h, the mixture was transferred into a 45 ml Teflon sealed autoclave and maintained at 160 °C for 10 h. For purification, the composite was washed with DI-water for several times then fully freeze dried at −80 °C for 24 h. The Fig. S1 showed that mass ratios of GO: zirconium isopropoxide above 1:6 yielded no increase in the adsorption capacity. Thus, a mass ratio of 1:6 was selected as optimal and used for the synthesis of RGO-Zr in subsequent experiments. All the chemicals used were reagent grade or better.

Characterization

The structures and properties of GO, RGO-Zr and Zr(OC3H7)4 were characterized by various methods. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained on a D/MAX-RBX-ray diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm). Transmission electron microscope (TEM, HT-7700, Hitachi, Japan) was used to analyze the morphology along with Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Japan). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were obtained on an ESCALAB 250Xi (Thermo Fisher) system with Al, Kα sources and all the binding energies were referenced to the C1s peak at 284.8 eV for the surface adventitious carbon. The binding properties were analyzed by Fourier Transform Infrared Nexus spectrophotometer (FTIR, Thermo Nicolet, America). Raman spectra were collected using an INVIA spectrophotometer (Renishaw, UK). The nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms were obtained on a Micrometrics ASAP 2020 apparatus at −196 °C. Finally, the surface zeta potentials of the samples were measured using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern, UK).

Adsorption studies

The potassium dihydrogen phosphate was used to compound the stock solution and was diluted with DI-water to form various phosphate concentrations. The pH was adjusted to 5.00 ± 0.20 using HCl (0.10 mol/L) and NaOH (0.10 mol/L) solutions. All suspensions flasks were sealed with parafilm and placed in a thermostatic shaker (100 rpm) at 298 K for 24 h. For the equilibrium adsorption isotherm study, the employed adsorbents were RGO-Zr, Zr(OC3H7)4, and GO powders. At low initial levels of phosphate below 0.70 mg/L, the adsorbent dose (0.01 g) and the volume of phosphate solution (400 mL) were constant. At higher initial concentrations of phosphate above 1.00 mg L−1, adsorbent (0.04 g) was put in 200 mL solutions. For the kinetics studies of phosphate removal with RGO-Zr, at low initial levels of phosphate (0.10, 0.30, 0.50 mg/L), the adsorbent (0.01 g) was put in 400 mL solutions. At higher initial concentrations of phosphate (1.00, 3.00, 5.00 mg/L), the adsorbent (0.04 g) was suspended in 200 mL solutions. A fixed volume of sample was taken out from the flask at predetermined time intervals.

Unless noted otherwise, the sampling volume and measurement method were performed following the route. First, the sample (3.00 mL) was taken out from the flask. The mixture was then filtered off using 0.45 μm membrane filters and the residual concentration of phosphate was obtained using the molybdenum blue method on a UV-1910 UV/Vis spectrometer at the detection wavelength of 883 nm. All the experiments were performed in duplicate modes and the averages were calculated. The adsorption amount of phosphate was estimated according to equations (1) to (3):

where qt is the adsorption amount (mg/g) at time t (min), qe is the adsorbed amount (mg/g) of phosphate at equilibrium, C0 is the initial phosphate concentration (mg/L), Ce is the equilibrium concentration (mg/L), V is the solution volume (L), m is the absorbent mass (g), and Re represents the removal efficiency at the adsorption equilibrium.

Effect of pH

The electrolyte pH constitutes one of the most important parameters that control the ion sorption process. The effect of pH on the adsorption of phosphate was evaluated by changing the initial pH from 2.00 to 11.30. This was done through agitation of a 30 mL (V) phosphate solution (C0 = 5.00 mg/L) put in a 100 mL flask containing 0.005 g of the adsorbent (RGO-Zr), shaken at a rate of 100 rpm for 24 h at 298 K.

Effect of temperature

The temperature can affect the adsorption process, thus was investigated at 288, 298, 308, and 323 K. The procedure consists of adding 0.005 g adsorbent (RGO-Zr) into a 500 mL flask containing 200 mL phosphate solution at different initial phosphate concentrations (0.10, 0.30, 1.00, and 3.00 mg/L at pH = 5.00), shaken at 100 rpm for 24 h.

Effect of coexisting anions

To investigate the competing effect of coexisting anions on the adsorption of phosphate, Na2SO4, NaF, NaCl, NaNO3 and Na2CO3 at concentrations varying from 0 to 5.00 mM were added to the phosphate solutions, respectively. For all experiments, the initial concentration of phosphate was 5.00 mg/L (0.002 mM) and that of the absorbent was 0.20 g/L. All the experiments were conducted in solutions at pH = 5.00 shaken at a rate of 100 rpm for 24 h at 298 K.

Results and Discussion

Characterization of adsorbents

The GO showed a spongy morphology after the freeze-drying process (Fig. 1a), while when dispersed in water it showed great dispersibility and hydrophilic features (Fig. 1b, left). The newly prepared material formed a three-dimensional structure hydrogel (Fig. 1c) during the hydrothermal treatment without stirring, and the solution was clean and transparent, indicting the efficient embedding zirconium particles. The color of the mixed solution was brown yellow solution (Fig. 1b, middle), however, the color of the suspension of RGO-Zr (Fig. 1b, right, after freeze drying) was black, indicating the reduction of GO to RGO. The reduction mechanism is likely related to H+ catalyzed intramolecular and intermolecular dehydration24. During the reduction, the number of the oxygenic groups was reduced, and the electrostatic as well as hydrophilic interactions were weakened, graphene oxide nanosheets were self-assembled and rearranged to form a network and the zirconium particles were captured into the network (Fig. 1d). Similar phenomenon was also found in Chen et al.25, Bai et al.24, Sheng et al.26.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Photographs of (a) GO, (b) solution of (GO left, a mixture of Zr(OC3H7)4 and GO middle, solution of RGO-Zr right), (c) RGO-Zr, and (d) the proposed self-assembly and wrapping mechanism for RGO-Zr architecture formation during the hydrothermal treatment.

The XRD pattern of GO (Fig. 2a) showed a typical characteristic diffraction peak located at 2θ = 9.89° associated with the (001) inter-planar spacing of 0.89 nm, and another small peak at 2θ = 27.12° 27 induced by the graphite and assigned to d-spacing of 0.317 nm. In the pattern of RGO, the appearance of the (002) diffraction line at 2θ = 25.61° (d-spacing of 0.35 nm) and disappearance of the diffraction peak at 2θ = 9.89° demonstrated that GO was reduced to RGO7,23. Also, the small diffraction peaks of RGO-Zr (Fig. 2a) observed at 2θ = 23.59° (d-spacing of 0.38 nm) suggested the successful reduction of GO to RGO. The peak intensity of RGO-Zr decreased markedly compared to RGO and the inter-planar spacing rose from 0.35 (RGO) to 0.38 nm, suggesting that ZrO2 was mostly attached to the RGO surface layers leaving few intercalation between them. These data proposed that zirconium and GO were successfully combined to form a new composite called RGO-Zr through the hydrothermal method.

Figure 2
Figure 2

(a) XRD patterns of RGO-Zr, Zr(OC3H7)4, GO, and RGO. (b) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of GO and RGO-Zr. (c) and (d) TEM images of GO and RGO-Zr. (e) and (f) SEM images of GO and RGO-Zr. (g) FTIR spectra of GO, Zr(OC3H7)4, RGO-Zr, and RGO-Zr after adsorption of phosphate. (h) Raman spectra of GO and RGO-Zr.

The nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of GO and RGO-Zr (Fig. 2b) exhibited type IV isotherms, as defined by IUPAC classification16,17. A hysteresis loop of type H3 in RGO-Zr at the relative pressures [P/Po] ranging from 0.45 to 1.00 indicated the possible presence of mesoporous structure17,18. Figure 2b (inset) demonstrated that most pores of RGO-Zr were mesopores, corroborating the XRD results. The size distribution varied from 2 to 50 nm, where pores with smaller size attributed to the RGO-Zr particles while those with larger size represent the porosity in the aggregates. The BET surface areas, pore volumes, and average pore sizes of GO and RGO-Zr are presented in Table S1. It will be noted that RGO-Zr adsorbent had a relatively larger surface area, higher pore volume, and looser structure than that of GO. The increased porosity of RGO-Zr might be caused by exfoliation and rearrangement of the layers during the reduction process17. In other words, the use of RGO as a substrate is beneficial for dispersion of Zr(OC3H7)4 and enhancing the adsorption capability.

The TEM image of GO shown in Fig. 2c appeared transparent and folded over the edges. The SEM image of GO displayed typical crumplings and ripples on the surface (Fig. 2e), which could be induced by the multilayer scrolling of the GO sheets. These results are similar to those observed by other researchers7,28. The RGO-Zr (Fig. 2d) showed larger elastic corrugations and scrolled or folded edges than the GO (Fig. 2c), with ZrO2 particles attached to the surface of RGO. The changes in porosity of RGO-Zr were supported by the SEM images (Fig. 2f, Fig. S2), the porous and loose structure of RGO-Zr was detected. The ZrO2 particles were loaded on both the surface and edges of RGO, corresponding to changes in the inter-planar spacing of the XRD patterns. As a result, it was hard to distinguish the boundaries, which further demonstrates the combination of both materials.

Figure 2g displays the FTIR spectra of Zr(OC3H7)4, GO, RGO-Zr and RGO-Zr after adsorption of phosphate and the characteristic bands are listed in Table S2. The GO contains several functional groups C = O, C = C (C-C), O-C = O, O-H17,29, and Zr(OC3H7)4 have -C(CH3)2, -CH3, C = C, C-O-Zr, Zr-O groups19,30. For RGO-Zr, new peaks appeared at the bending vibrations of O-H groups mixed with Zr-OH bending31, the C = C skeletal vibration of the RGO sheets32, -CH2 symmetrical stretching vibrations, and -CH2 antisymmetric stretching vibration. Other peaks located at 1726 cm−1 (C = O) and 1380 cm−1 (O-C = O) were markedly diminished or vanished from the spectrum when compared with those of GO and Zr(OC3H7)4. After adsorption of phosphate, the O-H group (1055 cm−1) of RGO-Zr was significantly reduced in intensity or completely vanished from the spectrum, indicating that other groups interacted with the -OH groups17. Likewise, the characteristic band of C-O-Zr vibration was blue shifted and weakened and that of Zr-O became less pronounced, implying that Zr-OH groups served as the active sites for the phosphate adsorption13.

Raman spectroscopy is a powerful and nondestructive technique frequently used for characterization of the sp2 and sp3 hybridized carbon atoms present in carbonaceous materials33. It can be utilized to identify disorder and defect structures and distinguish mono-, bi-, and multi-layer characteristics of graphene materials34. The Raman spectrum of GO (Fig. 2h) displayed two bands at 1343 and 1600 cm−1, corresponding to the D and G modes, respectively16. The G-band was attributed to the in-plane vibration of sp2 bonded carbon atoms, while the D-band was associated with the presence of defects in the graphitic layers16,35. The spectrum of RGO-Zr (Fig. 2h) depicted a red-shift in the D-band (1340 cm−1) and G-band (1597 cm−1) when compared to GO. The ratio of D to G bands peak intensities (ID/IG) is a common index used to evaluate the extent of defects on GO and RGO36. The ID/IG ratio of RGO was estimated to 1.87 and thus higher than that of the pristine GO (1.33), suggesting the successful reduction of GO to RGO.

XPS allows the direct determination of the elemental composition of GO and RGO27. The full XPS scan (Fig. 3a) showed the elements present with their atomic percentages on GO, RGO-Zr, and RGO-Zr after the adsorption of phosphate (Table S3). The C/O ratio was increased from 1.33 for GO to 2.03 for RGO-Zr, suggesting a decrease in the oxygen groups during the reduction process. The percent of Zr atom at the surface of RGO-Zr was estimated to 8.45%. A computational multi-peak resolution method for XPS was applied to the C1s, Zr 3d, and an O 1 s band of RGO-Zr. The C1s band of RGO-Zr (Fig. 3c) can be deconvoluted into three peaks located at 284.14, 285.41 and 288.09 eV, corresponding respectively to the C = C/C-C, C-O and C = O groups37. These results were in accordance with the FTIR data that showed that C = O and O-C = O groups were markedly diminished or vanished from the materials. The spectrum of the core level of Zr 3d for RGO-Zr (Fig. 3d) revealed a strong spin–orbit doublet due to both the Zr 3d5/2 at 182.92 eV and Zr 3d3/2 at 185.32 eV. The XPS spectrum was constrained by the Zr 3d5/2–Zr3 d3/2 spin–orbit separation of 2.40 eV, and the ratio of the two peaks areas of each doublet was estimated to 3:2. These features are characteristic of Zr4+ ions in full oxidation states38,39. The Zr 3d binding energy increased after the adsorption of phosphate (Fig. 3d) due to the partial replacement of –OH groups by phosphate ion to form Zr-O-P linkage with lower negative charge density than Zr-O-H7. The O 1 s peak could be best fitted with three overlapped O 1 s peaks of oxide oxygen (O2−), a hydroxyl group (-OH), and adsorbed water (H2O). The fitting parameters could be found in Table S4. It is clear from Table S4, Fig. 3e and f that the –OH percentage in the total surface oxygen sharply dropped from 44.54% to 18.37% after the adsorption of phosphate. This demonstrated that hydroxyl groups were probably replaced during the adsorption of phosphate ion. Thus, the surface hydroxyl group played a key role in the adsorption of phosphate on the surface, which was in accordance with the FTIR findings.

Figure 3
Figure 3

(a) XPS survey spectra of GO, RGO-Zr, and RGO-Zr after the phosphate adsorption. (b) The C1s binding energy of GO and RGO-Zr samples. (c) The C1s binding energy of RGO-Zr. (d) The Zr 3d binding energy of RGO-Zr and RGO-Zr after the phosphate adsorption. (e) The O 1 s binding energy of the RGO-Zr samples. (f) The O 1 s binding energy of RGO-Zr after adsorption of phosphate.

Based on the above analyses and relevant literature7,12,13, the adsorption mechanisms of phosphate would contain ion exchange and ligand exchange (outer or inner sphere complexes). Given that phosphate exists in weakly acidic solution (pH = 5.00) as predominately HPO4, thus the main reactions could be represented as in Fig. 47,12,13.

Figure 4: The main species of phosphate exits in weakly acidic solution and the possible reactions of phosphate adsorption on the surface of RGO-Zr.
Figure 4

Adsorption isotherms

The adsorption isotherms are useful to estimate the distribution of adsorbate molecules between the liquid and solid phases when the adsorption process reached an equilibrium state40. The adsorption capacity at various equilibrium concentrations of phosphate could also be revealed by the adsorption isotherms. Several mathematical models have been developed to describe the adsorption equilibria of phosphate on solid surfaces, such as the linear, Freundlich, and Langmuir models shown in equations (4) to (6). These are frequently utilized to fit the experimental data1.

where Ce (mg/L) is the equilibrium concentration of phosphate in water, qe (mg P/g) is the adsorption capacity of phosphate at equilibrium, k1 (L/g) is the slope of the linear model of phosphate adsorption efficiency, a (mg P/g) is the naturally adsorbed phosphate describing the adsorption of phosphate at low concentrations, qm (mg P/g) is the maximum adsorption capacity of phosphate, kL (L/mg) is the Langmuir adsorption isotherm constant related to the adsorption energy, kF is the Freundlich adsorption constant related to the adsorption capacity, and 1/n is an empirical parameter related to the intensity of adsorption.

Figure 5b demonstrates the adsorption isotherm of RGO-Zr, Zr(OC3H7)4 and GO at lower equilibrium concentrations of phosphate up to ~0.035 mg/L on RGO-Zr and Zr(OC3H7)4, and up to ~0.41 mg/L phosphate on GO. As shown in Table 1, the equilibrium data fit well with the Linear models. The three materials displayed different values of the parameter a (mg P/g) in the Linear models, and the highest value was recorded with RGO-Zr (a = 2.92). This means that compared to the others, RGO-Zr had an elevated adsorptivity for phosphate, which is naturally adsorbed at low concentrations of phosphate. Therefore, RGO-Zr composites can be used as a complementary technique to adsorb and treat the low concentrations of phosphate from the water after biological treatments.

Figure 5
Figure 5

(a) and (c) Adsorption of phosphate on the RGO-Zr, Zr(OC3H7)4 and GO at different initial concentrations. (b) and (d) Adsorption isotherms of RGO-Zr, Zr(OC3H7)4, and GO. (e) Linearized Langmuir isotherm model. (f) Linearized Freundlich isotherm model for the adsorption of phosphate on the RGO-Zr, Zr(OC3H7)4, and GO.

Table 1: Linear models parameters for adsorption of phosphate on RGO-Zr, Zr(OC3H7)4 and GO at low initial phosphate concentrations.

The adsorption isotherms at elevated equilibrium concentrations of phosphate were compiled in Fig. 5c, and the parameters obtained by fitting the experimental data were summarized in Table 2. The results suggested that the equilibriums of the three materials could be better described by the Langmuir model (high values of R2) rather than by Freundilich model. Nevertheless, a value of 1/n < 0.5 in Freundilich model indicated a favorable adsorption and the strength of the adsorbent varied in the following order: Zr(OC3H7)4 > RGO-Zr > GO. The values of qm estimated by the Langmuir models were 27.71 mg P/g, 23.42 mg P/g and 7.42 mg P/g for RGO-Zr, Zr(OC3H7)4 and GO, respectively. Although qm might not an accurate estimation of a long-term adsorption capacity, it is still useful for comparing alternative materials towards adsorption of phosphate. The data revealed that adsorption of phosphate on the RGO-Zr was much higher than that of GO (Fig. 5a and c), suggesting an enhanced phosphate adsorption ability caused by the loaded ZrO2 on RGO-Zr.

Table 2: Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models parameters for adsorption of phosphate on the RGO-Zr, Zr(OC3H7)4 and GO at high initial phosphate concentrations.

Table 3 lists the various phosphate adsorbents and their adsorption capacities. Although the adsorption capacity of RGO-Zr was not the highest, it still advantageous because the synthetic method of RGO-Zr is green and does not add additional reagents or produce pollutants as the previously mentioned complicated and harmful methods. Beside, RGO was successfully obtained from GO in pure water without using any reductant or surfactant, and ZrO2 was tightly integrated on the RGO surface during the hydrothermal treatment. Furthermore, RGO-Zr could easily be applied for small-scale treatment facilities or wastewater with relatively low phosphate concentrations, while some reported phosphate adsorbents in the literatures2,7,41 have higher equilibrium concentrations of phosphate after treatment.

Table 3: Phosphate adsorption capacities of various adsorbents.

To evaluate the mechanisms involved in the adsorption process, the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) was calculated according to equations from the literature17 and the details are listed in Table S5. The obtained negative value of ΔG for RGO-Zr suggested that the adsorption was spontaneous and contained physisorption processes. Based on data, the RGO-Zr has a great potential for use as a phosphate adsorbent.

Adsorption kinetics

The kinetic curves of the adsorption of phosphate on RGO-Zr at variable initial phosphate concentrations are presented and compared in Fig. 6. As depicted in Fig. 6a and b, the adsorption process could be divided into two stages: a rapid adsorption at the early stage induced by a large number of the available adsorption sites for phosphate, then followed by a gradually slower stage over time until reaching the equilibrium. At the initial low phosphate concentrations of 0.10, 0.30 and 0.50 mg/L, the adsorption reached equilibrium within approximately 256, 438 and 650 min, respectively. However, at higher initial phosphate concentrations of 1.00, 3.00 and 5.00 mg/L, the adsorption reached equilibrium within 40, 250 and 375 min, respectively. The pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order equations were further used to model the kinetics data using a linear fitting, with the models expressed in equations (7) to (8) 2:

Figure 6
Figure 6

(a) Adsorption of phosphate on RGO-Zr at variable low initial phosphate concentrations (adsorbent dosage = 0.025 g/L, pH = 5.00 ± 0.20, temperature = 298 K). (b) Adsorption of phosphate on RGO-Zr at different high initial phosphate concentrations (adsorbent dosage = 0.20 g/L, pH = 5.00 ± 0.20, temperature = 298 K). The pseudo-second-order kinetic curve fitting for: (c) low initial phosphate concentrations and (d) high initial phosphate concentrations.

where qe is the equilibrium adsorption amount (mg P/g), qt is the adsorption amount (mg P/g) at any time t (h), and k1 (1/h) and k2 (g/(mg h)) are the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order rate constants, respectively. The constant k2 is used to calculate the initial adsorption rate h (mg/(g h)) at t → 0 according to equation (9) 2:

The so-called half-adsorption time t1/2 (h) represents the time required for the adsorption to take up half of phosphate as an equilibrium value, which is an indicator of the adsorption rate that could be calculated by equation (10) 2:

The kinetic model parameters obtained by fitting the experimental data are summarized in Table 4. The kinetic data could well be described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The equilibrium adsorption amounts (qe,cal) calculated using the pseudo-second-order kinetic model were nearly identical to the experimental results (qe,exp), while the pseudo-first-order kinetic model did not fit well the data. This suggested that the adsorption process might be based on chemisorption, involving valence forces via shared or exchanged electrons between sorbent and sorbate (the replacement of -OH by phosphate)6,31. Similar kinetic results have been reported elsewhere for various phosphate adsorbents1,2,6. The overall rate of phosphate adsorption could be limited by the slower step, which would be either film diffusion or pore diffusion8. As the initial phosphate concentration increased and keeping other experimental conditions remained unchanged, the value of k2 decreased. This was induced by the numerous available adsorption sites at low initial phosphate concentrations if compared to high initial phosphate levels under the same experimental conditions.

Table 4: The kinetic models parameters for phosphate adsorption on the RGO-Zr at pH 5.00 ± 0.20 and 298 K.

At initial phosphate concentrations of 1.0, 3.0 and 5.0 mg L−1, the values of initial adsorption rate (h) were recorded as 135.14, 222.70 and 57.15 mg P/(g h) and the values of half-adsorption time (t1/2) were 0.04, 0.07 and 0.39 h, respectively. This suggested a declined adsorption rate and increased half-adsorption time as a function of the initial phosphate concentration at constant sorbent dose. The tendency was the same at the low initial phosphate concentrations but h and t1/2 were lower than those obtained with the initial high phosphate concentrations. Even so, the RGO-Zr could be considered as efficient for phosphate removal from aqueous solutions.

Influence of pH, temperature and coexisting ions

The point of zero charge (pHzpc) of RGO-Zr estimated using zeta potential measurements was found to be around 3.62 (Fig. 7a). It is worth noting that pH = 5.00 is considered as optimum pH for its superior adsorption capacity compared to the others. Above pHzpc, the surface charge of RGO-Zr was negative. The surface charge of RGO-Zr could interfere with the adsorption of phosphate to some extent but never eliminates removal of phosphate in the entire pH range, where all removal efficiencies were found above 90%. The phosphate adsorption on RGO-Zr was found insensitive to the increase of pH, where electrostatic adsorption was probably not the main mechanism to explain the behavior. Thus, RGO-Zr can be applied for phosphate removal in natural waters with pH values between 6 and 9 with superior obtained results if compared to those requiring strict pH ranges42,43,44.

Figure 7
Figure 7

(a) Effect of pH on phosphate adsorption capacity of RGO-Zr and the Zeta potential of RGO-Zr (adsorption conditions: C0 = 5.00 mg/L, adsorbent dosage = 0.33 g/L, temperature = 298 K), (b) Effect of temperature on phosphate adsorption capacity of RGO-Zr (adsorption conditions: C0 = 0.10, 0.30, 1.00, 3.00 mg/L, adsorbent dosage = 0.025 g/L, pH = 5.00 ± 0.20, temperature = 288, 298, 308, 323 K), (c) Effect of coexisting anionic strengths on phosphate adsorption capacity of RGO-Zr (adsorption conditions: C0 = 5.00 mg/L, adsorbent dosage = 0.20 g/L, pH = 5.00 ± 0.20, temperature = 298 K).

As shown in Fig. 7b, the adsorption capacity enhanced as the temperature increased, suggesting that phosphate adsorption on the RGO-Zr was endothermic. At the initial phosphate concentrations of 0.10 and 0.30 mg/L, the adsorption capacity enhanced slowly as the temperature rose. This phenomenon could be explained by the possibility that the adsorbent had absorbed nearly all the phosphate ions due to adequate adsorption sites of the adsorbent surface. Moreover, increased initial phosphate concentration resulted in enhanced adsorption capacity and adsorption efficiency, which could be attributed to the fact that higher temperatures can accelerate the diffusion of phosphate ions onto the adsorbent and enlarge the pore size of the adsorbent to some extent45.

Due to the complexity of substances present in natural waters, there might be competition in adsorption between the phosphate ions and other coexisting anions, such as SO42−, F, Cl, NO3 and CO32−, which usually exist in natural waters and might affect the efficiency of phosphate adsorption. Figure 7c shows that SO42−, F, Cl, NO3, CO32− influence differently the phosphate adsorption capacities of RGO-Zr. The presence of Cl, NO3 in water showed slight or no effect on phosphate adsorption using RGO-Zr. However, the existence of SO42−, CO32− lowered the phosphate adsorption on RGO-Zr. This could be related to the fact that Cl and NO3 form only weaker bonds of outer sphere complexes, while SO42−, CO32−, HPO42− (H2PO4, PO43−) form both outer and inner sphere complexes with the active surface sites8. Thus, the different affinities of the coexisting anions to the adsorption sites could differently impact the phosphate adsorption. However, high concentrations of F could enhance the adsorption capacities, while low concentrations would not. This could be caused by the chemical reactions between ZrO2 and F46. Considering the presence of much higher concentrations of the competing anions than the phosphate ions, these results clearly indicated that RGO-Zr still had good performance for removal of phosphate even at exceptionally elevated concentrations of competing ions. The latter was related to the relevant affinity of phosphate ions towards the adsorbent.

Conclusions

RGO-Zr adsorbent was prepared by a simple and green hydrothermal method and demonstrated to be effective for phosphate adsorption in water in terms of adsorption capacity and speed. The characterization studies showed that GO was reduced to RGO, and the zirconium particles were successfully loaded on the RGO surface. Furthermore, the RGO-Zr displayed a porous structure and larger specific surface areas than GO. The equilibrium adsorption data of phosphate on RGO-Zr fitted well the Langmuir isotherm model with a maximum adsorption capacity recorded as 27.71 mg P/g at pH 5 and 298 K. The phosphate adsorption kinetics followed a pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Furthermore, the phosphate adsorption was found insensitive to the increase in pH, while the adsorption capacity enhanced as the temperature rose. The coexisting interfering anions SO42−, F, Cl, NO3 and CO32− exhibited different effects on the phosphate adsorption capacities of RGO-Zr. The mechanisms of the adsorption of phosphate on RGO-Zr probably involved ion exchange, ligand exchange and physical adsorption. With further optimization, the RGO-Zr sorbent has the potential to be used for controlling phosphorus pollution due to its superior properties.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Luo, X. et al. Adsorption of phosphate in water using one-step synthesized zirconium-loaded reduced graphene oxide. Sci. Rep. 6, 39108; doi: 10.1038/srep39108 (2016).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Adsorption of phosphate from water on lake sediments amended with zirconium-modified zeolites in batch mode. Ecological Engineering 71, 223–233, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.07.035 (2014).

  2. 2.

    , , , & Immobilization of phosphorus from water and sediment using zirconium-modified zeolites. Environmental science and pollution research international 22, 3606–3619, doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3604-2 (2015).

  3. 3.

    & The adsorption of phosphate by graphene from aqueous solution. RSC Advances 2, 5234, doi: 10.1039/c2ra20270k (2012).

  4. 4.

    et al. Enhanced trace phosphate removal from water by zirconium(IV) loaded fibrous adsorbent. Water research 45, 4592–4600, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.06.009 (2011).

  5. 5.

    & Aqueous phosphate removal using nanoscale zero-valent iron. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 14, doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-0900-y (2012).

  6. 6.

    , , , & Strong adsorption of phosphate by amorphous zirconium oxide nanoparticles. Water research 47, 5018–5026, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.044 (2013).

  7. 7.

    et al. Adsorptive removal of phosphate ions from aqueous solution using zirconia-functionalized graphite oxide. Chemical Engineering Journal 221, 193–203, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.088 (2013).

  8. 8.

    , & Removal and recovery of phosphate ions from aqueous solutions by amine functionalized epichlorohydrin-grafted cellulose. Desalination 285, 277–284, doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.10.014 (2012).

  9. 9.

    , , , & Removal of phosphate from natural waters using innovative modified bentonites. Applied Clay Science 62–63, 101–106, doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2012.04.020 (2012).

  10. 10.

    & Equilibrium and kinetic analysis of phosphorus adsorption from aqueous solution using waste alum sludge. Journal of hazardous materials 184, 746–752, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.102 (2010).

  11. 11.

    , , , & Phosphate removal from synthetic and real wastewater using steel slags produced in Europe. Water research 46, 2376–2384, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.012 (2012).

  12. 12.

    et al. Selective adsorption of phosphate from seawater and wastewater by amorphous zirconium hydroxide. Journal of colloid and interface science 297, 426–433 (2006).

  13. 13.

    , , & Removal of phosphate by mesoporous ZrO2. Journal of hazardous materials 151, 616–622, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.033 (2008).

  14. 14.

    , & Adsorption of Phosphate from Aqueous Solution Using an Iron–Zirconium Binary Oxide Sorbent. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 223, 4221–4231, doi: 10.1007/s11270-012-1186-5 (2012).

  15. 15.

    et al. Zirconia functionalized SBA-15 as effective adsorbent for phosphate removal. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 155, 192–200, doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.01.020 (2012).

  16. 16.

    , , & Synthesis and characterization of reduced graphite oxide-polymer composites and their application in adsorption of lead. Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy 149, 991–996, doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2015.04.071 (2015).

  17. 17.

    , & Effect of the reduction degree of graphene oxide on the adsorption of Bisphenol A. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 109, 573–585, doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.03.002 (2016).

  18. 18.

    et al. Adsorptive removal of methylene blue by rhamnolipid-functionalized graphene oxide from wastewater. Water research 67, 330–344, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.026 (2014).

  19. 19.

    et al. Nanocomposites of graphene oxide-hydrated zirconium oxide for simultaneous removal of As(III) and As(V) from water. Chemical Engineering Journal 220, 98–106, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.017 (2013).

  20. 20.

    et al. One-step synthesis of easy-recycling TiO2-rGO nanocomposite photocatalysts with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 132–133, 452–459, doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.12.009 (2013).

  21. 21.

    , , & One-step preparation of hierarchical superparamagnetic iron oxide/graphene composites via hydrothermal method. Applied Surface Science 258, 1132–1138, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.09.049 (2011).

  22. 22.

    et al. An environmentally friendly and efficient route for the reduction of graphene oxide by aluminum powder. Carbon 48, 1686–1689, doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.063 (2010).

  23. 23.

    & Graphene oxide powders with different oxidation degree, prepared by synthesis variations of the Hummers method. Materials Chemistry and Physics 153, 209–220, doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.01.005 (2015).

  24. 24.

    , , & Effect of pH-induced chemical modification of hydrothermally reduced graphene oxide on supercapacitor performance. Journal of Power Sources 233, 313–319, doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.122 (2013).

  25. 25.

    , , & Self-assembly and embedding of nanoparticles by in situ reduced graphene for preparation of a 3D graphene/nanoparticle aerogel. Advanced materials 23, 5679–5683, doi: 10.1002/adma.201102838 (2011).

  26. 26.

    , , & High-performance self-assembled graphene hydrogels prepared by chemical reduction of graphene oxide. New Carbon Materials 26, 9–15, doi: 10.1016/s1872-5805(11)60062-0 (2011).

  27. 27.

    et al. Preparation of graphene by pressurized oxidation and multiplex reduction and its polymer nanocomposites by masterbatch-based melt blending. Journal of Materials Chemistry 22, 6088, doi: 10.1039/c2jm16203b (2012).

  28. 28.

    , , , & Synthesis of phosphorus-doped graphene and its multifunctional applications for oxygen reduction reaction and lithium ion batteries. Advanced materials 25, 4932–4937, doi: 10.1002/adma.201301870 (2013).

  29. 29.

    et al. In vitro and in vivo characterization of graphene oxide coated porcine bone granules. Carbon 103, 291–298, doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.010 (2016).

  30. 30.

    Characterization of phosphated zirconia by XRD, Raman and IR spectroscopy. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 141, 227–235, doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00344-6 (1998).

  31. 31.

    , , & Strong adsorption of arsenic species by amorphous zirconium oxide nanoparticles. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 18, 1418–1427, doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.01.045 (2012).

  32. 32.

    et al. Self-assembly of mildly reduced graphene oxide monolayer for enhanced Raman scattering. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 237, 57–63, doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2016.01.015 (2016).

  33. 33.

    et al. Adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution by graphene. Journal of colloid and interface science 363, 348–354, doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.032 (2011).

  34. 34.

    et al. Adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution by graphene. Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces 90, 197–203, doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.10.019 (2012).

  35. 35.

    et al. Raman Spectroscopy and Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy characteristics of the CVD suspended graphene. Diamond and Related Materials 64, 27–33, doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2016.01.008 (2016).

  36. 36.

    et al. Studying disorder in graphite-based systems by Raman spectroscopy. Physical chemistry chemical physics: PCCP 9, 1276–1291, doi: 10.1039/b613962k (2007).

  37. 37.

    , , , & Preparation and characterization of continuous SiZrOC fibers by polyvinyl pyrrolidone-assisted sol–gel process. Journal of Materials Science 51, 1418–1427, doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9461-7 (2015).

  38. 38.

    et al. High performance polymer solar cells with as-prepared zirconium acetylacetonate film as cathode buffer layer. Scientific reports 4, 4691, doi: 10.1038/srep04691 (2014).

  39. 39.

    Zirconium Dioxide Thin Films Characterized by XPS. Surface Science Spectra 7, 303, doi: 10.1116/1.1375573 (2000).

  40. 40.

    et al. Comparative study of methylene blue dye adsorption onto activated carbon, graphene oxide, and carbon nanotubes. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 91, 361–368, doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2012.07.007 (2013).

  41. 41.

    , , & Removal of phosphate from water by a Fe-Mn binary oxide adsorbent. Journal of colloid and interface science 335, 168–174, doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.03.019 (2009).

  42. 42.

    et al. Synthesis and phosphate uptake behavior of Zr4+ incorporated MgAl-layered double hydroxides. Journal of colloid and interface science 313, 53–63, doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.04.004 (2007).

  43. 43.

    et al. Equilibrium and kinetics of adsorption of phosphate onto iron-doped activated carbon. Environmental science and pollution research international 19, 2908–2917, doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-0799-y (2011).

  44. 44.

    , , , & Adsorption of phosphate using mesoporous spheres containing iron and aluminum oxide. Chemical Engineering Journal 210, 143–149, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.080 (2012).

  45. 45.

    & Adsorption of phosphate ions onto low cost Aleppo pine adsorbent. Desalination 275, 231–236, doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.004 (2011).

  46. 46.

    , , & Remediating fluoride from water using hydrous zirconium oxide. Chemical Engineering Journal 198–199, 236–245, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.084 (2012).

  47. 47.

    , , , & Phosphate removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption using ferric sludge. Desalination 280, 384–390, doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.028 (2011).

  48. 48.

    , , , & Batch and Fixed-Bed Column Performance of Phosphate Adsorption by Lanthanum-Doped Activated Carbon Fiber. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 223, 5893–5902, doi: 10.1007/s11270-012-1325-z (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (2012ZX07103-001) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China grants (21477159).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China

    • Xin Luo
    • , Xiurong Wang
    • , Shaopan Bao
    • , Xiawei Liu
    • , Weicheng Zhang
    •  & Tao Fang
  2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    • Xin Luo
    • , Shaopan Bao
    •  & Xiawei Liu

Authors

  1. Search for Xin Luo in:

  2. Search for Xiurong Wang in:

  3. Search for Shaopan Bao in:

  4. Search for Xiawei Liu in:

  5. Search for Weicheng Zhang in:

  6. Search for Tao Fang in:

Contributions

X.L. designed the experiments, carried out the experiments, composed the paper; X.R.W. designed the experiments; S.P.B. analyzed the data and wrote the paper; X.W.L. and W.C.Z. carried out the experiments; T.F. refined the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Fang.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39108

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.