Abstract
Topological semimetals (TSMs) including Weyl semimetals and nodalline semimetals are expected to open the next frontier of condensed matter and materials science. Although the first inversion breaking Weyl semimetal was recently discovered in TaAs, its magnetic counterparts, i.e., the timereversal breaking Weyl and nodal line semimetals, remain elusive. They are predicted to exhibit exotic properties distinct from the inversion breaking TSMs including TaAs. In this paper, we identify the magnetic topological semimetal states in the ferromagnetic halfmetal compounds Co_{2}TiX (X = Si, Ge, or Sn) with Curie temperatures higher than 350 K. Our firstprinciples band structure calculations show that, in the absence of spinorbit coupling, Co_{2}TiX features three topological nodal lines. The inclusion of spinorbit coupling gives rise to Weyl nodes, whose momentum space locations can be controlled as a function of the magnetization direction. Our results not only open the door for the experimental realization of topological semimetal states in magnetic materials at room temperature, but also suggest potential applications such as unusual anomalous Hall effect in engineered monolayers of the Co_{2}TiX compounds at high temperature.
Introduction
Topological semimetals (TSM) are electronic strong spinorbit metals/semimetals whose Fermi surfaces arise from crossings between conduction and valence bands, which cannot be avoided due to nontrivial topology^{1,2,3}. Such new states of topological matter have recently attracted worldwide interest because they may realize particles that remain elusive in high energy physics, exhibit quantum anomalies, host new topological surface states such as the Fermi arc and the drumhead surface states, and show exotic transport and spectroscopic behaviors arising from the novel bulk and surface topological band structures^{4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16}. Two of the most exciting proposed TSM states are the Weyl semimetal^{6,7,17,18,19,20} and the nodal line semimetal states^{21,22,23,24,25}. While the Fermi surface of a Weyl semimetal consists of isolated 0D points in k space, i.e., the Weyl nodes, the Fermi surface of a nodalline semimetal is a 1D closed loop, i.e., the nodal line winding in 3D momentum space. Although the first inversion breaking Weyl semimetal was recently discovered in TaAs^{6,7,17}, the timereversal breaking Weyl and nodal line semimetals remain elusive. The timereversal breaking (magnetic) Weyl and nodal line TSM states are predicted to show exotic properties beyond the inversionbreaking TSMs such as TaAs. Firstly, ferromagnetic materials usually have considerable electronelectron interaction. Hence, a magnetic TSM is a promising platform to study the interplay between the TSM states and electronic correlation, which may potentially lead to new correlated topological phases^{4,26,27}. Secondly, magnetic Weyl semimetals show the anomalous Hall effect^{28,29}, i.e., Halllike conductivity without an external magnetic field. When making such a magnetic Weyl semiemtal into 2D (monolayer), the anomalous Hall conductance may be quantized. To date, the quantum anomalous Hall effect has only been observed in magnetically doped topological insulator thin film samples such as Cr_{x}(Bi_{y}Sb_{1−y})_{2−x}Te_{3}^{30}, which required ultralow (mK) temperature. By contrast, monolayer samples of magnetic Weyl semiemtals, which are natural ferromagnets, may realize the quantum anomalous Hall effect at significantly higher temperature, and therefore make this novel phenomena relevant in actual applications^{28}. Thirdly, the superconducting proximity effect of a magnetic Weyl semimetal is predicted to show topological Weyl superconductivity^{31}. In such an exotic topological superconductor, the superconducting gap has point nodes, which are Weyl nodes, and the Weyl nodes are connected by Majorana Fermi arcs on the surface.
Despite interest, to date, magnetic topological semimetals remain experimentally elusive. One main difficulty is that ferromagnetic semimetals, regardless of its topological trivial/nontrivial nature, are rare in nature. The existing proposed magnetic TSM materials, such as the pyrochlore iridates and HgCr_{2}Se_{4}^{4,28} have relatively low magnetic transition temperatures that are much lower than the room temperature. This fact not only hinders the experimental confirmation but also makes the predicted TSM states inaccessible in actual applications. Here, we present our identification of the roomtemperature topological Weyl and nodal line semimetal states in halfmetallic Co_{2}TiX.
A halfmetal is a type of ferromagnet that acts as a conductor to electrons of one spin, but as an insulator or semiconductor to those of the opposite spin. This half metallicity suggests it to be a promising candidate for the TSM states because both the Weyl semimetal and nodalline semimetal states require crossings between two singly degenerate (spin polarized) bands. In this paper, we explore the possible existence of the TSM states in the halfmetallic full Heusler compounds. The halfmetallicity in full Heusler compounds including Co_{2}MnSi, Co_{2}MnGe, Co_{2}FeAl_{0.5}Si_{0.5}, and Co_{2}TiX (X = Si, Ge, or Sn) has been a wellknown phenomenon in both theory and experiments^{32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44}. Here, we focus on the Co_{2}TiX (X = Si, Ge, or Sn).
Electronic band structures were calculated within the density functional theory (DFT)^{45} framework with the projector augmented wave (PAW) method, using the VASP (Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package)^{46,47}. The generalized gradient approximation was used to describe the exchangecorrelation effects^{48}. We used a kinetic energy cutoff of 500 eV and a 16 × 16 × 16centered kmesh to sample the primitive bulk Brillouin zone (BZ). In order to compute the bulk band structures, we used the experimental lattice constants^{32}, a = 5.770 Å, a = 5.830 Å, and a = 5.997 Å for Co_{2}TiSi, Co_{2}TiGe and Co_{2}TiSn, respectively. The spinorbit coupling was employed in the electronic structure calculations as implemented in the VASP.
Co_{2}TiX crystalizes in a facecentered cubic (FCC) lattice with the space group Fm−3m (Fig. 1(a)). Previous magnetic (SQUID) measurements clearly established the ferromagnetic groundstate in these compounds. The relevant symmetries are the 3 mirror planes, (k_{x} = 0), (k_{y} = 0), (k_{z} = 0), and three C4 rotation axes, kx, ky and kz. The Curie temperatures are 380 K for Co_{2}TiSi, and Co_{2}TiGe and 355 K for Co_{2}TiSn. Figure 1(c–e) show the calculated spinresolved density of states (DOS). We clearly see that, for all three compounds, the band structure is fully gapped at the Fermi level for one spin, i.e., the minority spin, whereas it is metallic for the other spin, i.e., the majority spin. This demonstrates the halfmetallic groundstate of Co_{2}TiX, consistent with previous theoretical and experimental studies^{32,33,38,41}.
Figure 2 shows the firstprinciples calculated band structure along highsymmetry lines in the absence of spinorbit coupling. For the band structures of the minority spin (Fig. 2(a–c)), we obtain a minority spin band gap of about 0.5 eV, which is in agreement with previous spinresolved xray absorption spectroscopic measurements^{33}. On the other hand, the majority spin band structures (Fig. 2(d–f)) show clear band crossings between the conduction and valence bands along the Γ − X and Γ − K directions. Furthermore, additional band crossings between the majority and minority spins (highlighted by the black circles in Fig. 2(g–i)) are identified as we overlay the band structures of the two spins.
In order to understand the momentum space configuration of the band crossings without spinorbit coupling, we calculate the band structure at all k points throughout the bulk BZ. Figure 3(a) shows the band crossings in the first BZ. Specifically, we find that the crossings within the majority spin band structure form three nodal lines around the Γ point on the k_{x} = 0, k_{y} = 0, and k_{z} = 0 planes. Figure 3(c) show the energy dispersions along k_{x}, k_{y}, and k_{z} directions that cut across a k point on the k_{z} = 0 nodal line as noted by the black dot in Fig. 3(a). We see that the two bands disperse linearly away from the crossing point along the radial (k_{x}) direction, while becoming quadratic along the tangential direction. These dispersions confirm the existence of nodal lines. Furthermore, the opposite mirror eigenvalues of the two crossing bands confirm that these nodal rings in the majority spin channels are protected by mirror symmetry. We now consider the band crossings between bands of opposite spins. Since the bands of opposite spins do not hybridize without spinorbit coupling, the crossings form several 2D closed surfaces, i.e., nodalsurfaces, in the BZ. The situation on the k_{z} = 0 plane is shown in Fig. 3(d). In addition to the nodalline (the red lines), four nodalsurfaces also cross this plane inside the four quadrants.
In Fig. 4, we show the band structure after the inclusion of spinorbit coupling. In the presence of spinorbit coupling, the symmetry of the system and the electronic structures depend on the magnetization direction. We have calculated the free energy of the system with the magnetization direction along the (001), (110), and (111) directions. Our results show that the difference of the free energy along different magnetization directions is below 0.1 meV, which is beyond the resolution of DFT, suggesting that the system’s magnetization direction can be controlled by an external magnetic field. We present systematic calculation results with the (001) magnetization. With the magnetization along the (001) direction and in the presence of spinorbit coupling, only the mirror symmetry and the C_{4z} rotational symmetry are preserved. Hence we expect only the nodal line on the k_{z} = 0 plane to survive. Indeed, we found this to be the case as shown in Fig. 4(a,b). Near the k_{x} and k_{y} axes, the nodal line is formed by bands of the same (majority) spin and is indicted by red color. By contrast, along the k_{x} = k_{y} and k_{x} = −k_{y} axes (45°), the crossing happens between opposite spins and is denoted by black color. However, as spin is not a good quantum number in the presence of spinorbit coupling, the above description is approximate. On the other hand, the other two nodallines on the k_{x} = 0 and k_{y} = 0 planes are gapped out as the respective mirror symmetries are broken by the inclusion of spinorbit coupling and the (001) magnetization. As a result, we expect Weyl nodes to emerge. Specifically, we find threetypes of Weyl nodes, noted as , , and in Fig. 4(a–c), respectively, where the subscript denotes the magnetization direction. The are located on the k_{z} axis and they are quadratic double Weyl nodes with chiral charge of ±2. The , and are at arbitrary k points in the BZ and are single Weyl nodes with chiral charge of ±1. The energy and momentum space locations of the Weyl nodes are shown in Table 1. We have also calculated the Chern numbers on different k_{z} planes, which is plotted in the right panel of Fig. 4(c). The variation of the values of Chern numbers as a function of k_{z} is consistent with the k_{z} positions of the discovered Weyl nodes. Figure 4(d) shows the energy dispersion away from the Weyl node. The quadratic Weyl nodes are protected by the C_{4z} rotational symmetry. Indeed, we see that the two bands disperse linearly along the k_{z} direction but quadratically along the k_{x}, k_{y} directions. Finally, we briefly discuss the band structure with a (110) magnetization as the groundstate. Figure 4(e) shows a comparison between band structures with either a (001) or (110) magnetization direction. It can be seen that the two band structures are very similar, which is consistent with our conclusion that the free energy values with different magnetization directions are quite close to each other. We highlight the area enclosed by the orange box, which is the band structure along the (110) (the k_{x} − k_{y} = 0 and k_{z} = 0) direction. While the band structure with (001) magnetization shows an avoided crossing, i.e., a gap, inside the orange box, the band structure with (110) magnetization shows a band crossing. In this case, the three mirror symmetries (, and ) and the three C_{4} rotational symmetries (C_{4x}, C_{4y}, and C_{4z}) are broken. The preserved symmetries are the Mirror symmetry (the mirror plane normal to the (110) direction), the C_{2} rotational symmetry along the (110) direction, and the inversion symmetry. Therefore all the nodal rings will gap out. We note that the band crossing along (110) direction is protected as the two bands have the opposite eigenvalues of the C_{2} rotational symmetry. We have checked the chiral charge by calculating the Berry flux through a 2D closed surface in k space enclosing this crossing point and found that it is indeed a Weyl node. We note that this Weyl node, , does not exist in the band structure with the (001) magnetization but arise with the (110) magnetization. This fact suggests a novel possibility that the number, the momentum space location, and other properties of the Weyl nodes in the Co_{2}TiX system can be engineered by tuning the magnetization direction.
Now we discuss the surface states of Co_{2}TiGe in Fig. 5. Figure 5(b) shows the Fermi surface surface states of the Co_{2}TiGe(010) surface. The simulation does not take spinorbit coupling into account. As depicted by orange lines, the projected nodal ring can be clearly resolved on this surface. Moreover, surface state contours starting from the nodal ring could be observed. The energy dispersion along the white line in panel (b) is shown in Fig. 5(c) and further demonstrates the surface states originating from the bulk nodal ring. Thus we are able to identify the topological nature of the surface states. After turning on spinorbit coupling, no visible difference between the energy contours in panels (b) and (c) can be observed when compared to the spinless calculation, due to the very small strength of the spinorbit coupling in this material. Next we attempt to distinguish the Fermi arcs surface states of Co_{2}TiGe(010) with the magnetization direction along the z axis. The constant energy contours at the energy of Weyl points and are plotted in Fig. 5(d,e), respectively. Unfortunately, the larger area of the projected bulk pockets covers nearly the entire BZ and hinders the distinction of Fermi arc surface states. This phenomenon can be clearly demonstrated in a EK dispersion. Figure 5(f) shows the energy dispersion along the red circle in panel (d). The projections of the bulk conduction and valance bands dip into one another and cover the area belong to the Fermi arc surface states.
Although Fermi arc surface states are topologically guaranteed to exist in a Weyl semimetal in the ideal case, the situation in a real material system can become much more complicated. Due to the existence of chiral charge on a Weyl node, a 2D manifold in the BZ, such as a cylinder enclosing the Weyl point, carries a quantized Chern number. As a result, on the surface of an ideal Weyl semimetal, we could resolve Fermi arc surface states as illustrated in Fig. 5(g). However, we note that although quantized Chern numbers are topologically guaranteed, the topological surface states are not always distinguishable in a real material, such as Co_{2}TiGe(010). This is because when two bulk pockets of opposite chiral charges are projected onto the same area of the surface, the Fermi arc states are obscured and become extremely difficult to distinguish (Fig. 5(h)). However, we emphasize that the coverage of Fermi arc states by projected bulk pockets does not affect the identification of Weyl nodes and topological node rings in our Hesuler compounds.
We discuss the effect of the onsite Coulomb repulsion U to the band structure and the Weyl nodes. We use U = 0 in our paper. First, we emphasize that a previous work^{32} on Co_{2}TiX that combined both experimental measurements and firstprinciples calculations showed that the calculated band structure with U = 0 actually fits the experimental results better. Therefore, we believe that U = 0 better reflects the experimental reality. Nevertheless, we have also calculated the band structure with a finite U value. We found that a finite U does not have a significant effect on the majority spin band structure. On the other hand, a finite U does increase the band gap of the minority spin. Using this as a guideline, we can understand how a finite U value affects the Weyl nodes in our calculations. We take the (001) magnetization as an example. As we have discussed in Fig. 4(a), we find threetypes of Weyl nodes, noted as , , and . We further note that arises from the crossing between two mainly majority spin bands, whereas and arise from the crossing between one majority spin and one minority spin bands. Therefore, upon the inclusion of a finite U value, is hardly affected, while and are pushed to higher energies away from the Fermi level. As spin is not a good quantum number in the presence of spinorbit coupling, this is an approximation. However, as the spinorbit coupling in Co_{2}TiX (X = Si, Ge, or Sn) is not very strong, the mixing between the majority and minority spins is not expected to be signficant.
In conclusion, we have identified the magnetic topological Weyl and nodal line semimetal states in the ferromagnetic halfmetal compounds Co_{2}TiX (X = Si, Ge, or Sn) with Curie temperatures higher than 350 K. Our results pave the way for realizing topologically protected emergent properties in magnetic semimetals at room temperature, highlighting the potential for electronics and spintronics applications in the Co_{2}TiXbased compounds.
Methods
Electronic structures were calculated within the density functional theory (DFT)^{45} framework with the projector augmented wave (PAW) method, using the VASP^{46,47}. The generalized gradient approximation was applied to describe the exchangecorrelation effects^{48}. A kinetic energy cutoff of 500 eV was used for the plane wave basis set and a 16 × 16 × 16centered kmesh was used to sample the primitive bulk Brillouin zone. In order to compute the bulk band structures, the experimental lattice constants a = 5.830 Å, a = 5.997 Å and a = 5.770 Å for Co_{2}TiGe, Co_{2}TiSn and Co_{2}TiSi were respectively used. The spinorbit coupling was employed in the electronic structure calculations as implemented in the VASP. We use s, p and d orbitals for Co and Ti, and s and p orbitals for the X (Ge, Si, or Sn) atom to construct the Wannier function^{49}. The surface states of a semiinfinite slab were calculated using the iterative Green’s function method from the Wannier function based tightbinding model.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Chang, G. et al. Roomtemperature magnetic topological Weyl fermion and nodal line semimetal states in halfmetallic Heusler Co_{2}TiX (X=Si, Ge, or Sn). Sci. Rep. 6, 38839; doi: 10.1038/srep38839 (2016).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
 1.
A. M. Turner & A. Vishwanath. Beyond band insulators: topology of semimetals and interacting phases. arXiv:1301.0330 (2013).
 2.
M. Z. Hasan, S.Y. Xu & M. Neupane. Topological Insulators, Topological semimetals, Topological Crystalline Insulators, and Topological Kondo Insulators. In in Topological Insulators: Fundamentals and Perspectives edited by F. Ortmann, S. Roche, S. O. Valenzuela (John Wiley & Sons, 2015).
 3.
M. Z. Hasan, S.Y. Xu & G. Bian. Topological Insulators, Helical Topological Superconductors and Weyl Fermion Semimetals. Phys. Scr. T164, 014001 (2015).
 4.
X. Wan, A. M. Turner, A. Vishwanath & S. Y. Savrasov. Topological Smimetal and Fermiarc Surface States in the Electronic Structure of Pyrochlore Iridates. Phys. Rev. B 83, 205101 (2011).
 5.
S.Y. Xu et al. Observation of Fermi arc surface states in a topological metal. Science 347, 294 (2015).
 6.
S.Y. Xu et al. Discovery of a Weyl Fermion Semimetal and Topological Fermi Arcs. Science 349, 613 (2015).
 7.
B. Q. Lv et al. Experimental Discovery of Weyl Semimetal TaAs. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031013 (2015).
 8.
A. A. Burkov, M. D. Hook & L. Balents. Topological Nodal Semimetals. Phys. Rev. B 84, 235126 (2011).
 9.
C. Fang, Y. Chen, H.Y. Kee & L. Fu. Topological Nodal Line Semimetals with and without Spinorbital Coupling. Phys. Rev. B 92, 081201 (2015).
 10.
H. B. Nielsen & M. Ninomiya. The AdlerBellJackiw Anomaly and Weyl Fermions in a Crystal. Physics Letters B 130, 389–396 (1983).
 11.
A. A. Zyuzin & A. A. Burkov. Topological Response in Weyl Semimetals and the Chiral Anomaly. Phys. Rev. B 86, 115133 (2012).
 12.
S.M. Huang et al. A Weyl Fermion Semimetal with Surface Fermi Arcs in the Transition Metal Monopnictide TaAs Class. Nat. Commun. 6, 7373 (2015).
 13.
H. Weng et al. Weyl Semimetal Phase in Noncentrosymmetric TransitionMetal Monophosphides. Phys. Rev. X 5, 011029 (2015).
 14.
X. Huang et al. Observation of the ChiralAnomalyInduced Negative Magnetoresistance in 3D Weyl Semimetal TaAs. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031023 (2015).
 15.
C. Zhang et al. Signatures of the AdlerBellJackiw Chiral Anomaly in a Weyl Semimetal. Nat. Commun. 7, 10735 (2016).
 16.
H. Zheng et al. Atomic Scale Visualization of Quantum Interference on a Weyl Semimetal Surface by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. ACS Nano 10, 1378 (2016).
 17.
S.Y. Xu et al. Discovery of a Weyl Fermion State with Fermi Arcs in Niobium Arsenide. Nat. Phys. 11, 748 (2015).
 18.
B. Q. Lv et al. Observation of Weyl nodes in TaAs. Nature Phys. 11, 724 (2015).
 19.
S.Y. Xu et al. Experimental discovery of a topological Weyl semimetal state in TaP. Science Advances 1, e1501092 (2015).
 20.
I. Belopolski et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 066802 (2016).
 21.
L. S. Xie et al. A New Form of Ca_{3}P_{2} with a Ring of Dirac Nodes. APL Materials 3, 083602 (2015).
 22.
R. Yu et al. Topological NodeLine Semimetal and Dirac Semimetal State in Antiperovskite Cu_{3}PdN. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036807 (2015).
 23.
M. Zeng et al. Topological Semimetals and Topological Insulators in Rare Earth Monopnictides. arXiv:1504.03492 (2015).
 24.
G. Bian et al. Topological NodalLine Fermions in SpinOrbit Metal PbTaSe_{2}. Nat. Commun. 7, 10556 (2016).
 25.
G. Bian et al. Drumhead Surface States and Topological NodalLine Fermions in TlTaSe_{2}. arXiv:1508.07521 (2015).
 26.
D. Pesin & L. Balents. Mott Physics and Band Topology in Materials with Strong Spinorbit Interaction. Nat. Phys. 6, 376 (2010).
 27.
T. Morimoto & N. Nagaosa. Weyl Mott Insulator. Sic. Rep. 6, 19853 (2016).
 28.
G. Xu et al. Chern Semimetal and the Quantized Anomalous Hall Effect in HgCr_{2}Se_{4}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 186806 (2011).
 29.
A. A. Burkov. Anomalous Hall Effect in Weyl Metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 187202 (2014)
 30.
C. Chang et al. Experimental Observation of the Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in a Magnetic Topological Insulator. Science 340, 6129 (2013).
 31.
Y. Li & F. D. M. Haldane. Topological Nodal Cooper Pairing in Doped Weyl Seimetals. arXiv.org/abs/1510.01730 (2015).
 32.
J. Barth et al. Anomalous Transport Properties of the Halfmetallic Ferromagnets Co_{2}TiSi, Co_{2}TiGe and Co_{2}TiSn. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 3588 (2011).
 33.
P. Klaer et al. Tailoring the Electronic Structure of Halfmetallic Heusler Alloys. Phys. Rev. B 80, 144405 (2009).
 34.
S. J. Hashemifar, P. Kratzer & M. Scheffler. Preserving the HalfMetallicity at the Heusler Alloy Co_{2}MnSi(001) Surface: A Density Functional Theory Study. Phys. Rev.Lett. 94, 096402 (2005).
 35.
M. Jourdan et al. Direct Observation of Halfmetallicity in the Heusler Compound Co_{2}MnSi. Nat. Commun. 5, 3974 (2014).
 36.
R. Shan et al. Demonstration of HalfMetallicity in FermiLevelTuned Heusler Alloy Co_{2}FeAl_{0.5}Si_{0.5} at Room Temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 246601 (2009).
 37.
H. C. Kandpal, G. H. Fecher & C. Felser. Calculated Electronic and Magnetic Properties of the Halfmetallic, Transition Metal Based Heusler Compounds. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40, 1507 (2007).
 38.
M. C. Hickey, A. Husmann, S. Holmes & G. Jones. Anomalous Transport Properties of the Halfmetallic Ferromagnets Co_{2}TiSi, Co_{2}TiGe, and Co_{2}TiSn. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18, 2897 (2006).
 39.
S. Ishida et al. Band Theory of Co_{2}MnSn, Co_{2}TiSn and Co_{2}TiAl. J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 12, 1111 (1982).
 40.
I. Galanakis, P. H. Dederichs & N. Papanikolaou. SlaterPauling Behavior and Origin of the Halfmetallicity of the FullHeusler Alloys. Phys. Rev. B 66, 174429 (2002).
 41.
S. C. Lee, T. D. Lee, P. Blaha & K. Schwarz. Magnetic and Halfmetallic Properties of the FullHeusler Alloys Co_{2}TiX(X = Al, Ga; Si, Ge, Sn; Sb). J. Appl. Phys. 97, 10c307 (2005).
 42.
P. van Engen, K. Buschow & M. Erman. Magnetic Properties and Magnetooptical Spectroscopy of Heusler Alloys Based on Transition Metals and Sn. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 30, 374 (1983).
 43.
P. J. Webster & K. Ziebeck. Magnetic and Chemical Order in Heusler Alloys Containing Cobalt and Titanium. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 34, 1647 (1983).
 44.
K. Buschow, P. van Engen & R. Jongebreur. Magnetooptical Properties of Metallic Ferromagnetic Materials. J. Magn. Magn. Mater 38, 1 (1983).
 45.
P. Hohenberg & W. Kohn. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).
 46.
G. Kresse & J. Furthmueller. Efficient Iterative Schemes for ab initio Totalenergy Calculations using a Planewave Basis Set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
 47.
G. Kresse & D. Joubert. From Ultrasoft Pseudopotentials to the Projector Augmentedwave Method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
 48.
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke & M. Ernzerhof. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
 49.
N. Marzari & D. Vanderbilt. Maximally localized generalized Wannier functions for composite energy bands. Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997).
Acknowledgements
Work at Princeton is supported by the US Department of Energy under Basic Energy Sciences Grant No. DOE/BES DEFG0205ER46200. The work at National University of Singapore is supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its NRF fellowship (NRF Award No. NRFNRFF201303). G.C. and H.L. acknowledges visiting scientist support from Princeton University funds and partial support from the Moore Foundation under grant no. GBMF4547/Hasan.
Author information
Author notes
 Guoqing Chang
 , SuYang Xu
 & Hao Zheng
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Affiliations
Centre for Advanced 2D Materials and Graphene Research Centre National University of Singapore, 6 Science Drive 2, Singapore 117546
 Guoqing Chang
 , Bahadur Singh
 , ChuangHan Hsu
 & Hsin Lin
Department of Physics, National University of Singapore, 2 Science Drive 3, Singapore 117542
 Guoqing Chang
 , Bahadur Singh
 , ChuangHan Hsu
 & Hsin Lin
Laboratory for Topological Quantum Matter and Spectroscopy (B7), Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
 SuYang Xu
 , Hao Zheng
 , Guang Bian
 , Nasser Alidoust
 , Ilya Belopolski
 , Daniel S. Sanchez
 , Songtian Zhang
 & M. Zahid Hasan
Authors
Search for Guoqing Chang in:
Search for SuYang Xu in:
Search for Hao Zheng in:
Search for Bahadur Singh in:
Search for ChuangHan Hsu in:
Search for Guang Bian in:
Search for Nasser Alidoust in:
Search for Ilya Belopolski in:
Search for Daniel S. Sanchez in:
Search for Songtian Zhang in:
Search for Hsin Lin in:
Search for M. Zahid Hasan in:
Contributions
All authors contributed to the intellectual content of this work. Preliminary material search on the database and analysis were done by G.C. with the help of S.Y.X., H.Z., H.L. and M.Z.H. The theoretical analysis and computations were performed by G.C., B.S., C.H.H. and H.L. G. C., S.Y.X., H.Z. wrote the manuscript with the help from G.B., N.A., I.B., D.S.S., S.Z., H.L. and M.Z.H.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding authors
Correspondence to Hsin Lin or M. Zahid Hasan.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Further reading

Weylloop halfmetal in Li3(FeO3)2
Physical Review B (2019)

Hydrodynamics of Fermi arcs: Bulk flow and surface collective modes
Physical Review B (2019)

Complex exchange mechanism driven ferromagnetism in halfmetallic Heusler Co2TiGe : Evidence from critical behavior
Physical Review B (2019)

Quantum transport in topological semimetals under magnetic fields (II)
Frontiers of Physics (2019)

Critical behavior and magnetocaloric effect in magnetic Weyl semimetal candidate Co2−x ZrSn
Chinese Physics B (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.