Abstract
Dynamic behaviors of polymer chains adsorbed on an attractive, homogeneous surface are studied by using dynamic Monte Carlo simulations. The translational diffusion coefficient D_{xy} parallel to the surface decreases as the intrapolymer attraction strength E_{PP} or the polymersurface attraction strength E_{PS} increases. The rotational relaxation time τ_{R} increases with E_{PS}, but the dependence of τ_{R} on E_{PP} is dependent on the adsorption state of the polymer. We find that τ_{R} decreases with increasing E_{PP} for a partially adsorbed polymer but it increases with E_{PP} for a fully adsorbed polymer. Scaling relations D_{xy} ~ N^{−α} and τ_{R} ~ N^{β} are found for long polymers. The scaling exponent α is independent of E_{PS} for long polymers but increases with E_{PP} from α = 1.06 at E_{PP} = 0. While β ≈ 2.7 is also roughly independent of E_{PS} for the adsorbed polymer at E_{PP} = 0, but β increases with E_{PS} at E_{PP} > 0. Moreover, we find that β always decreases with increasing E_{PP}. Our results reveal different effects of the attractive surface on the diffusion and rotation of adsorbed polymers.
Introduction
Polymers can be adsorbed on surfaces/interfaces through physical adsorption or chemical bonding. Adsorption of flexible polymers can significantly and permanently modify the properties of surfaces^{1}. Simultaneously the attractive surface also changes the conformational and dynamic properties of polymers^{2,3,4}. The properties of adsorbed polymers play important roles in many chemical and biological applications^{1,5,6,7}, such as polymer nanocomposite materials^{8}, compatibilization by copolymers^{9,10,11}, colloid stabilization by polymeric surfactants^{12,13}, coating and lubrication^{14}, and DNA segregating in bacteria^{15} and packaging in viruses^{16}. The adsorption of polymers on surfaces/interfaces and the dynamical properties of adsorbed polymers have motivated extensive studies in experiment^{3,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25}, theory and simulation^{2,4,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49}.
The selfavoiding walk (SAW) model polymer on the simple cubic (sc) lattice was extensively used for studying the adsorption of polymers in theory as well as in simulations^{27}. The surface is usually simply assumed to be infinitely large, flat, and homogeneous. In this model system, every walk contacting with the surface is assigned a polymersurface interacting energy –E_{PS}. With increasing the surface attraction strength E_{PS} (the same as decreasing temperature), the polymer exhibits a phase transition from a desorbed state to an adsorbed state at the critical attraction (temperature). The critical attraction (temperature) was usually named as the critical adsorption point (CAP)^{27,31,35,41}, at which the free energy of an adsorbed polymer is equal to that of a free polymer in solution^{26,37}. At temperature below the CAP, the polymer is partially adsorbed on the surface and the dynamics of the polymer is confined. While at very low temperature far below the CAP, the polymer can be regarded as a fully adsorbed polymer^{30}. The fully adsorbed polymer can be simply regarded as a twodimensional (2D) polymer, while the desorbed polymer at temperature above the CAP can be regarded as a free polymer in threedimensional (3D) dilute solution.
It was found that the dynamic properties of a polymer, such as selfdiffusion coefficient and rotational relaxation time, were significantly influenced by the attractive surfaces. The translational diffusion parallel to the surface was slowed down obviously after the polymer was adsorbed on the surface^{25,30,31,32,50}. However, there were contradictory results about the scaling exponent α of the translational diffusion coefficient D_{xy} with polymer length N, D_{xy} ~ N^{−α}. It was pointed out that the exponent α was dependent on system temperature for the adsorbed SAW lattice polymer in the absence of intrapolymer attraction, specifically α was changed from 1 for partially adsorbed polymers to 2 for fully adsorbed ones^{30}. However, simulation on an offlattice polymer model showed that α was roughly independent of the attraction strength of the surface for the polymer in the absence of intrapolymer attraction^{31}. In that case α ≈ 1.1 was estimated for adsorbed polymers^{31}. While α ≈ 1.1 was also found for both desorbed polymer and fully adsorbed polymer using lattice polymer model^{32}. But a small value of α ≈ 0.8 was estimated for a partially adsorbed SAW polymer at temperature near CAP^{32}. Experiment on surface diffusion of Poly(ethylene glycol) found that the diffusion of polymers was slowed down and the value of α was increased obviously after adsorption^{22}. Similarly, experiment showed that DNA diffused slower in agarose gels than in solution, and α was increased obviously by confinements^{51}.
On the other hand, studies have revealed that the rotational relaxation time τ_{R} of a polymer became larger when the polymer was endgrafted^{33,52} or adsorbed on surfaces^{25,30,31,32,43}. It was found that τ_{R} increased with the attraction strength of surface for the partially adsorbed polymers^{30,31,32,43}. In dilute solution the SAW polymer chain follows Rouse dynamics as τ_{R} ~ N^{β} with the exponent β = 1 + 2ν = 2.2. Hahn and Kovac found that the presence of an impenetrable surface did not change the scaling of the rotational relaxation times with chain length for endgrafted polymers^{52}. Although τ_{R} was increased with a decrease in the temperature, β was found to be roughly independent of temperature^{30}. While simulation on BF polymer showed that for a partially adsorbed polymer β lied in the range 2.2 < β < 2.5, that is, as the temperature fell through the adsorption transition, a smooth crossover from 3D to 2D dynamics took place^{32}. Offlattice Monte Carlo (MC) simulation found that the relaxation time of the partially adsorbed polymer could be scaled with a large β ≈ 2.65^{31}. However, there is no experimental data about the behavior of β for adsorbed polymers.
In addition to the polymersurface attraction E_{PS}, the intrapolymer attraction E_{PP} is usually taken into account for more realistic polymer model. When two nonbonded monomers locate at nearest neighbor (NN) sites on the lattice, an attractive energy −E_{PP} is assigned. With an increase in the intrapolymer attraction strength E_{PP}, polymer exhibits a phase transition from an extended coil conformation with large statistical size to a compact globule with small statistical size. Therefore rich phases were found for the adsorbed polymer on surfaces after E_{PP} was taken into account^{41,53,54}. However, the dynamics of the adsorbed polymer is not fully understood, especially when the intrapolymer interaction is taken into account.
In this work, we present our study on the dynamics of a physically adsorbed polymer on an attractive, homogeneous surface using dynamic MC simulation. We mainly study the influence of E_{PS} and E_{PP} on the translational diffusion and rotational relaxation of the adsorbed polymer. Results show that both the translational diffusion coefficient D_{xy} parallel to the surface and the rotational relaxation time τ_{R} are dependent on E_{PS} and E_{PP}. We find that D_{xy} decreases with increasing E_{PS} or E_{PP}. The scaling exponent α in D_{xy} ~ N^{−α} is roughly independent of E_{PS} for long polymers, but increases with E_{PP}. However the behavior of τ_{R} is much more complicated. Although τ_{R} always increases with E_{PS}, it decreases with increasing E_{PP} for the partially adsorbed polymer and increases with E_{PP} for the fully adsorbed polymer. And the scaling exponent β in τ_{R} ~ N^{β} always decreases with increasing E_{PP}. We find that β is roughly independent of E_{PS} for the adsorbed polymer at E_{PP} = 0, but β increases with E_{PS} at E_{PP} > 0.
Simulation model and method
Model
We consider a coarsegrained linear polymer model on the sc lattice. The simulation box is a cuboid with the length L_{x}, L_{y}, and L_{z} in x, y, and z directions, respectively. The polymer chain of length N is composed of N identical monomers numbered sequentially from 1 to N. Here, a monomer corresponds to a small group of atoms instead of a specific atom in the polymer, and a bond represents the linkage between two monomers rather than a specific covalent bond between two atoms. Each monomer occupies one lattice site and each lattice site cannot be occupied simultaneously by two or more monomers. The bond length can be varied among 1, , and in the present model. In addition to the selfavoiding on the sc lattice, the intrapolymer NN monomermonomer attraction −E_{PP} is considered. In this work E_{PP} = 0 means only selfavoiding effect is taken into account for the polymer chain, that corresponding to an ordinary SAW polymer. An additional attraction is introduced in the polymer when E_{PP} > 0. And the statistical size of the polymer, e.g. the meansquare radius of gyration 〈R_{G}^{2}〉, is decreased with increasing E_{PP}.
For the polymer in 3D dilute solution, periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) are adopted in all the three directions. While for the adsorbed polymer, PBCs are only adopted in the x and y directions. An infinitely large, impenetrable, homogeneous, flat surface is placed at z = 0, which produces a homogeneous attraction to the polymer. When monomers are at the NN layer of the surface, i.e. at z = 1, an attractive polymersurface attraction −E_{PS} is assigned. Therefore the energy of the polymer can be described as
Here n_{PP} is the number of intrapolymer NN pairs and n_{PS} is the surface contact number of polymer.
Simulation method
The dynamics of polymer chains is achieved by adopting bond fluctuation method invented by Carmesin and Kremer^{55} and Metropolis algorithm. The global dynamics of polymer chains is achieved by a huge number of local displacements of monomers resulting from random collisions between chain monomers and solvent molecules. For each local displacement, a monomer is chosen randomly and attempted to move one lattice spacing selected randomly from its six NN sites. If the move satisfies: (i) the new site is empty, (ii) bonds don’t intersect, and (iii) bond lengths vary among 1, , and , it will be accepted with a probability p = min[1, exp(−ΔE/k_{B}T)], where ΔE is the energy shift due to the change of monomer’s site. In simulation, we count the change of numbers n_{PP} and n_{PS} for every move, and thus obtain the energy shift ΔE. During one MC step (MCS), every monomer attempts to move once on average. In this work, MCS is the unit of time. And the unit of energy is k_{B}T with k_{B} the Boltzmann constant and T the temperature.
At the beginning of every simulation run, a polymer is generated and equilibrated for about N^{2.2} (≈N^{1+2ν}) MCS between a virtual surface at z = L_{z}/4 and a top surface at z = L_{z}. The virtual surface is repulsive to polymer. With the virtual surface, polymer is equilibrated before adsorption. Then we remove the virtual surface and let the polymer undergo trial moves until it contacts with the bottom adsorbing surface and settles into the adsorbed equilibrium state. At last we let the polymer random diffuse for sufficiently long time which is used for recording the polymer conformational properties. We perform 5000 independent runs with different initial configurations and random number series. Simulation results are averaged over these 5000 independent samples and the simulation errors in the measured parameters are small.
Results and Discussions
We study the dynamics of a single adsorbed polymer on a flat surface. Simulations are carried out at k_{B}T = 1 below the CAP of the SAW polymer at E_{PP} = 0 and E_{PS} = 1, which was estimated to be about 1.625^{56}. And it was pointed out that the CAP was increased with an increase in E_{PP}^{48,53}. Our simulations are performed at E_{PP} ≥ 0 and E_{PS} ≥ 1, therefore the polymer is always adsorbed during the whole statistical time^{46}. However, at such low temperature, the polymer chain can still diffuse and adjust its configuration^{50}. Since the attraction is not strong enough in this work, the number of adsorbed monomers is less than the polymer length, therefore the adsorbed polymer is called as a partially adsorbed polymer.
In addition to the partially adsorbed polymer, there are two other states for polymers, i.e. a fully adsorbed polymer and a desorbed polymer. A fully adsorbed polymer would appear at high E_{PS}. In the present work a 2D polymer model on surface is adopted as the fully adsorbed polymer. While a desorbed polymer appears at low E_{PS}, and thus a 3D polymer in dilute solution is adopted for the desorbed polymer.
The polymer also exhibits a coilglobule transition in solution as well as on adsorbing surface^{57,58}. For the present model, the coilglobule transition is occurred at about E_{PP} = 0.5, although the transition point increases slightly with E_{PS}^{48,53,57}.
Translational diffusion of partially adsorbed polymer
We have measured the translational diffusion for the adsorbed polymer chain. The diffusion is characterized by the meansquare displacement (MSD) of the center of mass
Here < > denotes an ensemble average over independent samples, and r_{cm}(t) is the position vector of the center of mass of polymer chain at time t and r_{cm}(0) at initial time t = 0. For the partially adsorbed polymers, the diffusion in the surface normal direction can be neglected and thus the diffusion is mainly confined parallel to the surface. Therefore, we have the parallel component 〈Δr^{2}(t)〉_{xy} ≈ 〈Δr^{2}(t)〉 for the partially adsorbed polymers. In this sense, the partially adsorbed polymer can be regarded as a quasi2D one.
Simulation results show that MSD increases linearly with time for the partially adsorbed polymer, analogous to the free polymer in 3D dilute solution. As an example, we show the time dependence of MSD in the inset of Fig. 1. Thus, the translational diffusion coefficient D_{xy} for such a quasi2D system can be obtained through
While for the polymer in 3D dilute solution, we have D_{xy} = D due to the isotropy of our simulation system. We find that the translational diffusion coefficient D_{xy} is dependent on the simulation parameters, such as intrapolymer attraction E_{PP}, polymersurface attraction E_{PS}, and polymer length N.
We have studied the influence of the intrapolymer attraction E_{PP} on the translational diffusion coefficient D_{xy}. Figure 1 shows the dependence of D_{xy} on E_{PP} for the polymer adsorbed on surface at E_{PS} = 1, 1.5, and 2. We find that the simulated data for N = 8, 16, 32, 64, 96, 128 are qualitatively similar, so here we only present the results for N = 64. It is clear that D_{xy} decreases smoothly with increasing E_{PP}. It is known that polymer compacts itself or monomers aggregate with the increase in E_{PP}. This decreases the mobility of monomers and thus decreases the diffusion coefficient of the whole polymer chain.
On the other hand, from Fig. 1 we note that D_{xy} also decreases with an increase in the polymersurface attraction strength E_{PS} for all E_{PP}s. Since the number of adsorbed monomers increases with E_{PS}, the results indicate that the translational diffusion is obviously slowed down with an increase in the number of adsorbed monomers. Because of confinement introduced by the surface, the mobility of adsorbed monomers is lower than that of desorbed monomers, thus the diffusion coefficient decreases with increasing E_{PS}.
To further understand the diffusion behavior of the partially adsorbed polymers, the diffusion constants of the polymer in 3D dilute solution and on 2D surface are also calculated. The polymer in the 3D dilute solution corresponds to the utmost limit of weak attraction of the surface and the polymer on the 2D surface corresponds to the utmost limit of strong attraction of the surface. The results of the 3D and 2D diffusions are also presented in Fig. 1. We find that 3D diffusion is faster than 2D one. The reason is that the 2D polymer suffers stronger excluded volume (EV) effect, thus the mobility of 2D polymer is lowered down.
It is clear to see that the diffusion of adsorbed polymer locates between the 3D and 2D cases. That is, the adsorbed polymer diffuses slower than the 3D one in dilute solution, but faster than the 2D one on surface. In other words, the adsorbing surface prevents the diffusion of polymers, and the diffusion becomes slow as the adsorption strength E_{PS} increases. However, such a difference in D_{xy} dies away with the increase in E_{PP}. For example, at E_{PP} = 1, one can see that D_{xy} is roughly independent of E_{PS}.
It was pointed out that the polymer length N dependence of D scales as D ~ N^{−1} for the Rouse model when hydrodynamic interactions are ignored for ideal random walk chains^{59}. We have checked the scaling relation
for polymers in different situations. Figure 2 presents the dependence of D_{xy} on N for polymers in dilute solution, partially adsorbed on surface, and fully adsorbed on surface with different intrapolymer interactions.
For the SAW polymers without intrapolymer attraction (E_{PP} = 0), we find that D_{xy} can be scaled with N in the power law relation D_{xy} ~ N^{−α} and the apparent exponent is found to be α ≈ 1.06 for all cases, i.e., it is roughly independent of E_{PS}. The value α ≈ 1.06 indicates that the dynamics of SAW polymers is of Rouse type. It is also in agreement with earlier simulation results for adsorbed polymer chains in good solvent^{31}.
When the intrapolymer attraction is considered, such as E_{PP} = 1, the apparent exponent α becomes larger than that at E_{PP} = 0. At E_{PP} = 1, polymer becomes compact and the degree of compact increases with the chain length N. Therefore, the diffusion coefficient is further decreased with increasing N, resulting in a larger exponent α at larger E_{PP}. For polymer on 2D surface, we find the simulation results can be well expressed by the scaling law D_{xy} ~ N^{−α} with α ≈ 1.66.
Whereas for the desorbed polymer in 3D dilute solution, the dependence of D_{xy} on N is of polymer length dependence at E_{PP} = 1 and 2. We find that D_{xy} decreases faster for short polymer length, i.e. the apparent exponent α estimated from short polymer region is larger. However, for long polymer region, it is interesting to see that the apparent exponent α is roughly the same as that of polymer on 2D surface. For partially adsorbed polymers, the diffusion coefficient lies between that of 3D and 2D cases. At E_{PS} = 1, we find the diffusion coefficient is close to the 3D one for short polymer lengths while that is close to the 2D one for long polymer lengths. While at E_{PS} = 2, the diffusion coefficient is close to 2D one even for short polymer lengths. Therefore we conclude that the apparent exponent α of the partially adsorbed long polymers is the same as that of polymer on 2D surface. A big value α ≈ 2.25 is estimated at E_{PP} = 2.
Figure 2 shows that the apparent exponent α of long polymer is only dependent on E_{PP} but is independent of E_{PS}. Figure 3 presents the apparent exponent α for the diffusion of long polymer. We find that α increases smoothly with E_{PP}. As already shown in the above discussion, the decrease of D_{xy} with increasing E_{PP} is due to the fact that more and more monomers become close to each other. The longer the chain length is, the stronger the effect is. So the apparent exponent α increases with E_{PP}.
In short, the diffusion of adsorbed polymer on the homogeneous surface is obviously slowed down by the attraction of surface. This is in agreement with experimental observations^{22,25,51} and other simulations^{30,31,32}. Our results show that the exponent α in the scaling law D_{xy} ~ N^{−α} is independent of the surface attraction, however, this is inconsistent with experimental results^{22}. We also observe a new result that α increases with the intrapolymer attraction.
We notice that the experiment on the surface diffusion of Poly(ethylene glycol) found that the scaling exponent α was increased obviously after adsorption^{22}. The reason for such an increase is complex and is not clear^{22}. Since our simulation results show that the homogeneous surface does not affect the scaling exponent α, one of the possible reasons for the change of α is that the surface in experiment is heterogeneous. A heterogeneous surface with nonuniformly distributed attraction points will produce a parallel barrier for the diffusion, and that may change the diffusion behavior as that of polymer in crowded environment. It was found that value α for the diffusion of DNA in agarose gels was increased obviously^{51}. The diffusion of polymer on heterogeneous surface deserves further study. Another possible reason is that the hydrodynamic interaction (HI) effect, which was included in experiment, is not considered in the present work. A surface can change the HI effect because of less solvent molecules near surface. It will be also interesting to simulate the HI effect on the diffusion of adsorbed polymers in future.
Rotational relaxation of partially adsorbed polymer
In this subsection, we study the rotational relaxation of the partially adsorbed polymer chain on homogeneous surface. We have calculated the endtoend vector rotational autocorrelation function of the polymer^{29,30,52,60}
where R(t) is the endtoend vector of a polymer chain at time t and < > also means an average over the ensemble of independent samples. Here ρ(t) describes the degree of rotation for polymer. For the partially adsorbed polymer chain at temperature below CAP, the endtoend distance vector R is roughly parallel to the surface, thus ρ(t) describes the rotation parallel to surface while the contribution from the surface normal direction can be neglected. It is expected that ρ(t) decays as
thus one can estimate the rotational relaxation time τ_{R} by fitting the decay of ρ(t) to an exponential decay function. Figure 4 presents the simulation results of ρ(t) for N = 64 at E_{PS} = 1 and E_{PP} = 0, 0.3, and 0.5. One can see that ρ(t) decays exponentially in a relatively long time region. However, the width of the exponentially decay region is dependent on the interaction parameters. In this work, τ_{R} is estimated from the decay of ρ(t) in the region 0.06 < ρ(t) < 0.30 where the best fitting can be always obtained^{29}.
It is interesting to see that the rotational relaxation time τ_{R} of the partially adsorbed polymer decreases as the intrapolymer attraction E_{PP} increases. This is possibly because the intrapolymer attraction reduces the size of polymer. Then the moment of inertia of polymer for rotation, which is in proportion to the size of polymer, decreases with increasing E_{PP}, too. Therefore the intrapolymer attraction accelerates the rotation of polymer. However, with further increase in E_{PP}, the conformation of polymer chain will be changed from a random coil state to a compact globule state^{53}. We find that it is difficult to estimate τ_{R} for polymer in the globule state at E_{PP} > 0.5. Therefore we restrict E_{PP} < 0.5 in this work.
We have investigated the influence of surface attraction and intrapolymer attraction on τ_{R} for the partially adsorbed polymer. The values of τ_{R} at different E_{PP} and E_{PS} are simulated. Figure 5 presents the dependence of τ_{R} on E_{PP} for N = 64 at E_{PS} = 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5. For comparison, results for polymer chains in dilute solution (desorbed polymer) and on 2D surface (fully adsorbed polymer) are also presented. We find that τ_{R} increases with E_{PS} for the partially adsorbed polymer, in agreement with previous simulation results^{30,31,32,43} and experiment^{25}. The results show that the attractive surface obviously slows down the rotation of polymer.
It is interesting to notice that different behaviors of τ_{R} are observed for polymer in 3D dilute solution and on 2D surface, respectively. We find that τ_{R} decreases with an increase in E_{PP} in 3D dilute solution, but increases with E_{PP} on 2D surface. The result implies that the rotational behavior of polymer on surface is different from that in solution.
For the partially adsorbed polymer chain, τ_{R} is also dependent on E_{PP}. Figure 5a shows that τ_{R} decreases with increasing E_{PP} at small E_{PS} but it increases with increasing E_{PP} at E_{PS} = 2.5. It is clear that the behavior of the partially adsorbed polymer changes from 3D like to 2D like with the increase in E_{PS}. On the other hand, τ_{R} increases with E_{PS}, the underlying reason could be explained as follows: the polymersurface attraction keeps monomers close to the surface and makes it hard to relax rotationally. Figure 5b presents the ratio τ_{R}/τ_{R,0} for different E_{PS}, where τ_{R,0} is the rotational relaxation time at E_{PP} = 0. It is clear to see that the effect of surface on the polymer rotation increases with E_{PS}.
We have calculated τ_{R} for other polymer lengths at different E_{PP} and E_{PS}. For all polymer lengths, we observe that τ_{R} of the adsorbed polymer is larger than that in dilute solution, but smaller than the one on 2D surface. And for all E_{PP}, τ_{R} increases monotonically with E_{PS}. So the adsorbing surface not only reduces diffusion as discussed in the previous subsection, but also prevents the polymer from relaxing rotationally.
From Fig. 5 we see that the behavior of the partially adsorbed polymer changes from 3D like to 2D like as the surface attraction strength E_{PS} increases. We have also simulated the rotational relaxation times for different polymer lengths from 8 to 128. For the partially adsorbed polymers, we find that the relationship between τ_{R} and E_{PP} is also dependent on the polymer length. Figure 6 presents the dependence of τ_{R} on E_{PP} for N = 8, 16, 64, and 96 at E_{PS} = 1. We find that τ_{R} decreases with increasing E_{PP} for long polymers but it increases with increasing E_{PP} for short polymers. It is known that, near CAP, the number of adsorbed monomers M increases with N as M ~ N^{ϕ} with the crossover exponent ϕ near 0.5^{27,35}. Since the fraction of adsorbed monomers M/N ~ N^{ϕ−1} decreases with increasing polymer length, it is reasonable to find that long adsorbed polymers behave more like the polymer in dilute solution whereas short ones behave more like that on 2D surface. Shorter polymers are significantly influenced by the adsorbing surface and the corresponding τ_{R} increases with E_{PP}.
Figure 7 presents the polymer length dependence of the rotational relaxation time τ_{R} for polymers in different situations. We find that the relaxation time can be always scaled as
We estimate β = 2.3 for the simple SAW polymer (i.e. E_{PP} = 0) in dilute solution, indicating that the SAW polymer in dilute solution roughly follows Rouse dynamics with the exponent β = 1 + 2ν_{3D} = 2.2 with the Flory exponent ν_{3D} = 0.6. While we find β = 2.7 for the SAW polymer chain on 2D surface, also close to the expected value 1 + 2ν_{2D} = 2.5 with ν_{2D} = 0.75 for the dynamics of a SAW polymer on 2D surface. It is interesting to find that, for the partially adsorbed SAW polymer in the absence of intrapolymer attraction, i.e. E_{PP} = 0, the exponent β is roughly independent of the surface attraction and is roughly equal to that of a 2D SAW polymer, that is in agreement with earlier finding that β of a partially adsorbed polymer was independent of temperature^{30}. Our value β = 2.7 for the adsorbed polymer is larger than 2.56 for a BF polymer model^{32} but close to β = 2.65 for an offlattice polymer model^{31}.
When the intrapolymer attraction is taken into account, for example at E_{PP} = 0.5, the scaling relation (Eq. 7) is still hold, but the exponent β is dependent on the surface attraction. We find β increases with E_{PS}.
We find that the exponent β is dependent on both the surface attraction and the intrapolymer attraction. The exponent β at different E_{PP} and E_{PS} is calculated and the results are presented in Fig. 8. We find that β decreases with increasing E_{PP}. The intrapolymer attraction attracts monomers together, that reduces polymer’s statistical size and accelerates the rotation. As the effect of the intrapolymer attraction on the polymer increases with polymer length, it is reasonable to find β decreases with increasing E_{PP}. On the other hand, the surface will retard the rotation of polymer. Thus we find β increases with increasing E_{PS}.
Conclusions
The dynamics of a bond fluctuation polymer chain adsorbed on an attractive, homogeneous surface is simulated by using dynamic Monte Carlo simulations. We have investigated the translational diffusion parallel to surface and the rotational relaxation of the partially adsorbed polymer. For comparison, we have also simulated the dynamics for a desorbed polymer chain and for a fully adsorbed one. Results show that the dynamics of polymer is strongly dependent on the intrapolymer attraction E_{PP} and the polymersurface attraction E_{PS}. However, the effects of the attractive surface on the diffusion and rotation of polymers are different. The main results are summarized in Fig. 9.
For the desorbed polymer in dilute solution, the translational diffusion is reduced whereas the rotation is speeded up with an increase in the intrapolymer attraction E_{PP}.
The translational diffusion of polymer is reduced when it is adsorbed on surface. The translational diffusion coefficient D_{xy} of the adsorbed polymer also decreases with increasing E_{PP}. The scaling exponent α of D_{xy} for long polymer length N is independent of E_{PS}, i.e., it is the same for the desorbed polymer, partially adsorbed polymer, and fully adsorbed polymer. However α increases with E_{PP} from α = 1.06 at E_{PP} = 0.
The rotational relaxation time τ_{R} of the adsorbed polymer always increases with E_{PS}, indicating that the surface attraction reduces the rotation of the adsorbed polymer. However, the dependence of τ_{R} on E_{PP} is dependent on the state of the adsorbed polymer. We find that, with an increase in E_{PP}, τ_{R} decreases for the partially adsorbed polymer but increases for the fully adsorbed polymer. The scaling exponent β of τ_{R} with N is also dependent on E_{PP} and E_{PS}. At E_{PP} = 0, we find β ≈ 2.7 independent of E_{PS} for the partially adsorbed polymer. But at E_{PP} > 0, we find β increases with E_{PS}. However, β always decreases with increasing E_{PP}.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Yang, Q.H. and Luo, M.B. Dynamics of adsorbed polymers on attractive homogeneous surfaces. Sci. Rep. 6, 37156; doi: 10.1038/srep37156 (2016).
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
 1.
Milner, S. T. Polymer brushes. Science 251, 905–914 (1991).
 2.
Milchev, A. Singlepolymer dynamics under constraints: scaling theory and computer experiment. J. Phys: Condens. Matter 23, 103101 (2011).
 3.
Chang, C. M., Lau, Y. G., Tsai, J. C. & Juan, W. T. Relaxation of DNA on a supported lipid membrane. EPL 99, 48008 (2012).
 4.
Li, Y. W., Wüst, T. & Landau, D. P. Generic folding and transition hierarchies for surface adsorption of hydrophobicpolar lattice model proteins. Phys. Rev. E 87, 012706 (2013).
 5.
De Gennes, P. G. Scaling theory of polymer adsorption. J. Phys. (Paris) 37, 1445–1452 (1976).
 6.
Alexander, S. Adsorption of chain molecules with a polar head a scaling description. J. Phys. (Paris) 38, 983–987 (1977).
 7.
De Gennes, P. G. Conformations of polymers attached to an interface. Macromolecules 13, 1069–1075 (1980).
 8.
Liu, J. et al. Polymer–nanoparticle interfacial behavior revisited: A molecular dynamics study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 13058–13069 (2011).
 9.
Macosko, C. W. et al. Compatibilizers for melt blending: Premade block copolymers. Macromolecules 29, 5590–5598 (1996).
 10.
Bikiaris, D. & Panayiotou, C. LDPE/starch blends compatibilized with PEgMA copolymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 70, 1503–1521 (1998).
 11.
Díaz, M. F., Barbosa, S. E. & Capiati, N. J. Reactive compatibilization of PE/PS blends. Effect of copolymer chain length on interfacial adhesion and mechanical behavior. Polymer 48, 1058–1065 (2007).
 12.
Neyret, S., Ouali, L., Candau, F. & Pefferkorn, E. Adsorption of polyampholytes on polystyrene latex: Effect on colloid stability. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 176, 86–94 (1995).
 13.
Meredith, J. C. & Johnston, K. P. Theory of polymer adsorption and colloid stabilization in supercritical fluids. 2. Copolymer and endgrafted stabilizers. Macromolecules 31, 5518–5528 (1998).
 14.
Teraoka, I. Polymer solutions in confining geometries. Prog. Polym. Sci. 21, 89–149 (1996).
 15.
Jun, S. & Mulder, B. Entropydriven spatial organization of highly confined polymers: Lessons for the bacterial chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12388–12393 (2006).
 16.
Williams, M. C. Stuffing a virus with DNA: Dissecting viral genome packaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11125–11126 (2007).
 17.
Frantz, P. & Granick, S. Kinetics of polymer adsorption and desorption. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 899–902 (1991).
 18.
Trens, P. & Denoyel, R. Conformation of poly(ethy1ene glycol) polymers at the silica/water interface: A microcalorimetric study. Langmuir 9, 519–522 (1993).
 19.
Hall, D. B. & Torkelson, J. M. Small molecule probe diffusion in thin and ultrathin supported polymer films. Macromolecules 31, 8817–8825 (1998).
 20.
Maier, B. & Rädler, J. O. Conformation and selfdiffusion of single DNA molecules confined to two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1911–1914 (1999).
 21.
Guthold, M. et al. Direct observation of onedimensional diffusion and transcription by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Biophys. J. 77, 2284–2294 (1999).
 22.
Sukhishvili, S. A. et al. Surface diffusion of poly(ethylene glycol). Macromolecules 35, 1776–1784 (2002).
 23.
Park, J. H. & Aluru, N. R. Water film thicknessdependent conformation and diffusion of singlestrand DNA on poly(ethylene glycol)silane surface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 123703 (2010).
 24.
Gam, S. et al. Macromolecular diffusion in a crowded polymer nanocomposite. Macromolecules 44, 3494–3501 (2011).
 25.
Chang, C. M., Lau, Y. G., Ou, S. C., Lin, T. Y. & Juan, W. T. Anomalous diffusion of DNA on a supported cationic lipid membrane. EPL 109, 38002 (2015).
 26.
Hammersley, J. M., Torrie, G. M. & Whittington, S. G. Selfavoiding walks interacting with a surface. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 15, 539–571 (1982).
 27.
Eisenriegler, E., Kremer, K. & Binder, K. Adsorption of polymer chains at surfaces: Scaling and Monte Carlo analyses. J. Chem. Phys. 77, 6296–6320 (1982).
 28.
Meirovitch, H. & Livne, S. Computer simulation of long polymers adsorbed on a surface. II. Critical behavior of a single selfavoiding walk. J. Chem. Phys. 88, 4507–4515 (1988).
 29.
Shaffer, J. S. Computer simulation of homopolymer and copolymer adsorption dynamics. Macromolecules 27, 2987–2995 (1994).
 30.
Lai, P. Y. Statics and dynamics of a polymer chain adsorbed on a surface: Monte Carlo simulation using the bondfluctuation model. Phys. Rev. E 49, 5420–5430 (1994).
 31.
Milchev, A. & Binder, K. Static and dynamic properties of adsorbed chains at surfaces: Monte Carlo simulation of a beadspring model. Macromolecules 29, 343–353 (1996).
 32.
Ponomarev, A. L., Sewell, T. D. & Durning, C. J. Surface diffusion and relaxation of partially adsorbed polymers. J. Polym. Sci. B: Polym. Phys. 38, 1146–1154 (2000).
 33.
Huang, J. H., Jiang, W. H. & Han, S. J. Dynamic Monte Carlo simulation on the polymer chain with one end grafted on a flat surface. Macromol. Theory Simul. 10, 339–342 (2001).
 34.
Gong, Y. C. & Wang, Y. M. Partitioning of polymers into pores near the critical adsorption point. Macromolecules 35, 7492–7498 (2002).
 35.
Descas, R., Sommer, J.U. & Blumen, A. Static and dynamic properties of tethered chains at adsorbing surfaces: A Monte Carlo study. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 8831–8840 (2004).
 36.
O’Shaughnessy, B. & Vavylonis, D. Nonequilibrium in adsorbed polymer layers. J. Phys: Condens. Matter 17, R63–R99 (2005).
 37.
Ziebarth, J., Orelli, S. & Wang, Y. M. The adsorption and partitioning of selfavoiding walk polymer chains into pores from a bulk theta solution. Polymer 46, 10450–10456 (2005).
 38.
Ziebarth, J. D., Wang, Y. M., Polotsky, A. & Luo, M. B. Dependence of the critical adsorption point on surface and sequence disorders for selfavoiding walks interacting with a planar surface. Macromolecules 40, 3498–3504 (2007).
 39.
Källrot, N. & Linse, P. Dynamic study of singlechain adsorption and desorption. Macromolecules 40, 4669–4679 (2007).
 40.
Luo, M. B. The critical adsorption point of selfavoiding walks: A finitesize scaling approach. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 044912 (2008).
 41.
LuettmerStrathmann, J., Rampf, F., Paul, W. & Binder, K. Transitions of tethered polymer chains: A simulation study with the bond fluctuation lattice model. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 064903 (2008).
 42.
Zhao, J., Wang, Q., Liang, G. & Zheng, J. Molecular dynamics simulations of lowordered Alzheimer βamyloid oligomers from dimer to hexamer on selfassembled monolayers. Langmuir 27, 14876–14887 (2011).
 43.
De Virgiliis, A., Milchev, A., Rostiashvili, V. G. & Vilgis, T. A. Structure and dynamics of a polymer melt at an attractive surface. Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 97 (2012).
 44.
Tian, W. D. & Ma, Y. Q. Theoretical and computational studies of dendrimers as delivery vectors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 705–727 (2013).
 45.
Polotsky, A. A. Adsorption of a periodic heteropolymer onto a periodic heterogeneous surface: a directed walk model. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 245002 (2014).
 46.
Yang, Q. H., Qian, C. J., Li, H. & Luo, M. B. Dynamics of a polymer adsorbed to an attractive homogeneous flat surface. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 23292–23300 (2014).
 47.
Klushin, L. I., Skvortsov, A. M., Polotsky, A. A., Qi, S. & Schmid, F. Sharp and fast: Sensors and switches based on polymer brushes with adsorptionactive minority chains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 068303 (2014).
 48.
Luo, M. B., Ziebarth, J. D. & Wang, Y. M. Interplay of coilglobule transition and surface adsorption of a lattice HP protein model. J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 14913–14921 (2014).
 49.
Polotsky, A. A. Adsorption of a homopolymer chain onto a heterogeneous stripepatterned surface studied using a directed walk model of the polymer. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 015001 (2016).
 50.
Li, H., Qian, C. J., Wang, C. & Luo, M. B. Critical adsorption of a flexible polymer confined between two parallel interacting surfaces. Phys. Rev. E 87, 012602 (2013).
 51.
Pluen, A., Netti, P. A., Jain, R. K. & Berk, D. A. Diffusion of macromolecules in agarose gels: Comparison of linear and globular configurations. Biophys. J. 77, 542–552 (1999).
 52.
Hahn, T. D. & Kovac, J. Computer simulation of the dynamics of a polymer chain terminally attached to a rigid flat surface. Macromolecules 23, 5153–5154 (1990).
 53.
Bachmann, M. & Janke, W. Conformational transitions of nongrafted polymers near an absorbing substrate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 058102 (2005).
 54.
Möddel, M., Janke, W. & Bachmann, M. Comparison of the adsorption transition for grafted and nongrafted polymers. Macromolecules 44, 9013–9019 (2011).
 55.
Carmesin, I. & Kremer, K. The bond fluctuation method: A new effective algorithm for the dynamics of polymers in all spatial dimensions. Macromolecules 21, 2819–2823 (1988).
 56.
Li, H., Qian, C. J. & Luo, M. B. Simulation of a flexible polymer tethered to a flat adsorbing surface. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 124, 282–287 (2012).
 57.
Yang, Q. H., Wu, F., Wang, Q. & Luo, M. B. Simulation study on the coilglobule transition of adsorbed polymers. J. Polym. Sci. B: Polym. Phys. 54, 2359–2367 (2016).
 58.
Binder, K., Baschnagel, J., Müller, M., Paul, W. & Rampf, F. Simulation of phase transitions of single polymer chains: Recent advances, Macromol. Symp. 237, 128–138 (2006).
 59.
Rouse, P. E. A theory of the linear viscoelastic properties of dilute solutions of coiling polymers. J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1272–1280 (1953).
 60.
Chang, R. & Yethiraj, A. Dynamics of chain molecules in disordered materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 107802 (2006).
Acknowledgements
The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 11374255 and 21574117.
Author information
Affiliations
Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
 QingHui Yang
 & MengBo Luo
Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing, China
 MengBo Luo
Authors
Search for QingHui Yang in:
Search for MengBo Luo in:
Contributions
M.B.L. designed research; Q.H.Y. performed simulation and prepared figures; Q.H.Y. and M.B.L. analyzed data and wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to MengBo Luo.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Further reading

Simulation study on the conformational properties of an adsorbed polymer on a nanoparticle
Colloid and Polymer Science (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.