Neuromodulation confers flexibility to anatomically-restricted neural networks so that animals are able to properly respond to complex internal and external demands. However, determining the mechanisms underlying neuromodulation is challenging without knowledge of the functional class and spatial organization of neurons that express individual neuromodulatory receptors. Here, we describe the number and functional identities of neurons in the antennal lobe of Drosophila melanogaster that express each of the receptors for one such neuromodulator, serotonin (5-HT). Although 5-HT enhances odor-evoked responses of antennal lobe projection neurons (PNs) and local interneurons (LNs), the receptor basis for this enhancement is unknown. We used endogenous reporters of transcription and translation for each of the five 5-HT receptors (5-HTRs) to identify neurons, based on cell class and transmitter content, that express each receptor. We find that specific receptor types are expressed by distinct combinations of functional neuronal classes. For instance, the excitatory PNs express the excitatory 5-HTRs, while distinct classes of LNs each express different 5-HTRs. This study therefore provides a detailed atlas of 5-HT receptor expression within a well-characterized neural network, and enables future dissection of the role of serotonergic modulation of olfactory processing.
Animals continually alter their behavior to meet dynamic internal and external demands. Neuromodulation promotes behavioral flexibility from anatomically restricted neural networks by altering the biophysical and synaptic properties of individual neurons1,2. Typically, neuromodulators activate G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs)3 with ligand binding initiating an intracellular signaling cascade that dictates the effect of a neuromodulator on a neuron. Depending on the G-protein associated with a given neuromodulatory receptor, a single neuromodulator can differentially affect the excitability and the synaptic strength of individual neurons in a network2,4,5. Moreover, these receptors can be expressed by multiple cell types within a sensory circuit6,7,8,9, and/or concertedly expressed by the same cell10, thus compounding the effects of a single neuromodulator. The multi-dimensional effects of a single neuromodulator acting on individual neurons within a network increases the dynamic range of network activity, ultimately promoting depth to behavioral output. Within the antennal lobe (AL) of Drosophila, the first olfactory processing center of the brain, the neuromodulator serotonin (5-HT) has widespread effects on odor-evoked responses of different neuronal classes11. However, it is difficult to determine how 5-HT modulates olfactory processing without knowing which functional neuron classes express each 5-HT receptor (5-HTR). Here, we exploit recent technological advances to generate a comprehensive atlas of 5-HTR expression in the well-characterized AL of Drosophila.
In the AL of Drosophila there are three major neuron classes that each perform distinct functions (Fig. 1a); olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs), projection neurons (PNs), and local interneurons (LNs)12. The dendrites and soma of odor-detecting ORNs are housed in the antennae and maxillary palps and, generally, each ORN expresses one chemosensory receptor protein endowing them with sensitivity to a particular set of odorants13. The axon terminals of ORNs that express the same chemosensory protein converge in the same glomerulus14,15,16 where they form excitatory synapses with PNs and LNs. PN cell bodies surround the AL in 3 distinct cell clusters: ventral, lateral, and anterodorsal cell clusters17,18. PNs, the second-order neurons of the AL, express acetylcholine (e-PNs)19 or GABA (i-PNs)20. Recent evidence suggests that these PN types may respond to different categories of odors based on the odor’s attractiveness21,22,23. PNs project to two higher-order brain structures, the mushroom bodies and lateral horn19,24,25. PN spiking activity is refined by several distinct classes of AL LNs that act upon PNs directly, as well as the input that they receive from ORNs and other LNs. LNs are remarkably diverse in their morphology and physiology26,27. In terms of transmitter content, subsets of LNs express GABA28, acetylcholine29,30, glutamate31, neuropeptides32,33 and can be electrically coupled34. Thus, even within these major AL neuron classes, there is a large degree of diversity which may also be indicative of differences in their expression of modulatory receptors.
Within the AL of Drosophila there are two 5-HT immunoreactive neurons; the contralaterally projecting, serotonin-immunoreactive deutocerebral (CSD) neurons35,36. Each CSD neuron innervates both ALs, as well as both lateral horns. Exogenous application of 5-HT in Drosophila increases PN sensitivity, and enhances PN responses in an odor-dependent manner11. Serotonin also decreases the strength of ORN responses to antennal nerve stimulation by enhancing GABAergic presynaptic inhibition of ORNs. However, 5-HT could enhance the activity of a given neuron by directly affecting excitability or by altering the synaptic input that a neuron receives either by increasing excitation or decreasing inhibition depending on 5-HTR expression within the network. The Drosophila genome encodes five 5-HTR genes (5-HT1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, and 7) that target distinct second-messenger pathways. 5-HT1 type, 2 type, and 7 type receptors are negatively coupled to adenylate cyclase, positively coupled to phospholipase C, and positively coupled to adenylate cyclase, respectively37,38,39,40. Therefore, the 5-HT1 type receptors are generally inhibitory, while the 5-HT2 type and 7 are generally excitatory41. Thus, to determine the receptor basis for the effects of 5-HT on individual neuronal classes within the AL we made use of the newly available 5-HTR MiMIC T2A-GAL4 protein-trap and gene-trap transgenic fly lines42 in combination with immunocytochemistry. These fly lines have undergone recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE) in order to replace their 5′ non-coding (“gene-trap”) or coding-intronic (“protein-trap”) MiMIC cassette with a GAL4 containing cassette42,43,44. In the case of the gene-trap lines, the MiMIC cassette is replaced with a cassette encoding a universal splice-acceptor and GAL4. In the case of the protein-trap lines, the MiMIC cassette is replaced with one that encodes a universal splice acceptor followed by a self-cleaving T2A peptide45,46 fused to the GAL4 coding sequence (see42 for a detailed description of cassette insertion sites). Thus, the gene-trap and protein-trap 5-HTR lines represent endogenous 5-HTR gene transcription and translation, respectively. However, with the exception of 5-HT7, we rely on protein-trap 5-HTR lines to determine what neuronal populations express a given 5-HTR. It should be noted that this approach relies on endogenous 5-HTR translation or transcription to produce GAL4, and subsequently GFP throughout a 5-HTR expressing neuron. Thus, GFP expression does not reflect the distribution of individual 5-HTR proteins along a cell, but rather that a given neuron expressed a 5-HTR. We find that different protein-trap lines for the same 5-HTR highlight neurons of the same functional class (Fig. 1b–f and Table 1). However, in some instances, we note subtle differences between the number of neurons labeled by T2A-GAL4 lines for the same 5-HTR (see Supplementary Information Fig. S1). At the extreme, the difference between two T2A-GAL4 lines for 5-HT2B is ~2–4 PNs out of a population of ~51 PNs (~4–8% of the entire population). More importantly, coding-intronic insertion lines for the same 5-HTR were expressed by the same combinations of neuronal populations (i.e. ORNs, latPNs, vPNs, etc.) and sub-population (i.e. TKKinergic LNs, MIPergic LNs, etc.) (Supplementary Information Fig. S1).
In general, we found that each 5-HTR is expressed by distinct neuronal populations suggesting that 5-HT differentially modulates separate features of olfactory coding. For the most part, the excitatory 5-HTRs (5-HT2A, 2B, and 7) were expressed by excitatory AL neurons, whereas distinct classes of LNs expressed different sets of 5-HTRs. This suggests that 5-HT has both direct effects on PN excitability, as well as indirect effects on PN responses via modulation of the lateral interactions exerted within and between glomeruli by LNs. Our results represent the first steps towards understanding the mechanistic basis for serotonergic modulation on Drosophila olfactory processing.
Antennae and maxillary palp ORNs express 5-HT2B
In Drosophila, ORN axons cross the midline via the antennal commissure to innervate a specific glomerulus in both the ipsilateral and contralateral AL47. Thus, neurites crossing the midline via the antennal commissure provide a reliable anatomical marker for ORNs. We observed a large amount of GFP-expressing fibers crossing through the antennal commissure in both 5-HT2B T2A-GAL4 lines (Fig. 2a) that were not apparent in other 5-HTR lines. The exception to this was the 5-HT7 T2A-GAL4, in which there were a small number of fibers with extremely faint GFP expression (data not shown). Additionally, there were a large number of GFP-expressing cell bodies in both the antennae (Fig. 2b) and the maxillary palps (Fig. 2c), suggesting that ORNs express the 5-HT2B receptor. To confirm that the 5-HT2B T2A-GAL4 driven GFP-expression in axons crossing the antennal commissure originated from ORNs within the antennae and maxillary palps, we ablated either or both appendages of newly eclosed adult flies and examined for the presence of GFP in the antennal commissure. Removal of either the antennae (Fig. 2d) or maxillary palps (Fig. 2e) on their own only partially eliminated the expression of GFP within the antennal commissure. However, removal of both the antennae and maxillary palps resulted in total loss of GFP-positive arbors crossing the antennal commissure (Fig. 2f), indicating that ORNs in both the antennae and maxillary palps express the 5-HT2B receptor.
Lateral PNs and anterodorsal PNs express excitatory 5-HTRs
The majority of the excitatory PNs (ePNs) reside in the lateral and anterodorsal cell clusters (latPNs and adPNs, respectively). Previous reports have identified ~35 latPNs48 (based on latPNs expressed by GH146-GAL4) and ~73 adPNs49, the majority of which are cholinergic19. 14.59 ± 1.01 (n = 11) latPNs express 5-HT2A (Fig. 3a,b), while 12.04 ± 0.86 (n = 13) latPNs express 5-HT7 (Fig. 3c,d). The 5-HT2B is expressed by 9.67 ± 0.13 (n* = 2 transgenic lines, n = 13 and 10 brains per line) latPNs (Fig. 3e,f). To a lesser extent, 4.58 ± 0.90 (n* = 3 transgenic lines, n = 6–11 brains per line) latPNs express 5-HT1A (data not shown). Within the adPNs, 19.3 ± 0.53 (n = 10) cells express 5-HT7 (Fig. 3g–h), while 7.88 ± 0.67 (n* = 2 transgenic lines, n = 9 and 7 brains per line) cells express 5-HT2B (Fig. 3i,j). Similar to the number of 5-HT2B expressing adPNs, 5-HT1A is expressed by 8.12 ± 0.62 (n* = 3 transgenic lines, n = 8–9 brains per line) adPNs (data not shown). Exogenous application of 5-HT increases the odor-evoked responses of ePNs within these two cell clusters11, therefore this enhancement is at least in part direct in nature, as 5-HT2A and 5-HT7 are positively coupled to IP3 and cAMP pathways, respectively.
Widespread 5-HTR expression within the ventral PNs
Cells of the vPN cell cluster project into the AL through a characteristic fascicle, which we refer to as the “ventral AL fascicle” (see Supplementary Information Fig. S1), and send their axons to the lateral horn through the mediolateral antennal lobe tract (mlALT)18. However, the glutamatergic LNs that are ventral to the AL50 also project into the AL through the ventral AL fascicle (see Supplementary Information Fig. S2). Therefore, we defined every non-glutamatergic neuron with a soma ventral to the AL that projects into the AL through the ventral AL fascicle as a vPN. Previous reports have identified ~51 vPNs; ~45 vPNs labeled by MZ699-GAL449 and 6 labeled by GH146-GAL451. In terms of transmitter content, ~36 vPNs are GABAergic based on vPNs expressed by GH146-GAL424 and MZ699-GAL422, and while cholinergic vPNs have been described19, the number of cholinergic vPNs has not been quantified.
Within the vPNs, there are subsets of cells that express each of the 5-HTRs, although the total number of vPNs expressing each receptor did vary between receptor types (Fig. 4). Furthermore, each 5-HTR is expressed by a combination of GABAergic and cholinergic vPNs. The two 5-HT1 type receptors are similarly expressed within the vPNs. 5-HT1A is expressed by 21.70 ± 1.10 (n* = 3 transgenic lines, n = 18–22 brains per line) vPNs, of which 13.84 ± 1.14 are GABAergic and 7.87 ± 0.36 are cholinergic (Fig. 4a–c), while 5-HT1B is expressed by 25.33 ± 1.02 (n = 18) vPNs, of which 15.5 ± 1.02 (n = 9) are GABAergic and 9.83 ± 1.13 (n = 9) are cholinergic (Fig. 4d–f). The 5-HT2A is the least widely expressed receptor within the vPNs, with only 6.73 ± 0.75 (n = 22) vPNs, of which 2.95 ± 0.40 (n = 11) are GABAergic and 3.77 ± 0.69 (n = 11) are cholinergic (Fig. 4g–i). Finally, 5-HT2B and 5-HT7 are expressed in similar numbers of vPNs to the 5-HT1 type receptors. The 5-HT2B is expressed by 19.81 ± 1.30 (n* = 2 transgenic lines, n = 20 and 25 brains per line) vPNs, of which 12.33 ± 1.03 are GABAergic and 7.47 ± 0.75 are cholinergic (Fig. 4j–l). Similarly, 5-HT7 is expressed by 23.55 ± 1.13 (n = 19) vPNs, of which 16.67 ± 2.0 (n = 6) are GABAergic and 6.88 ± 0.52 (n = 13) are cholinergic (Fig. 4m–o). These results suggest that while 5-HT likely has a widespread effect on vPNs, these effects will be heterogeneous as both excitatory and inhibitory 5-HTRs are expressed by both GABAergic and cholinergic vPNs. Moreover, when combined with the observed diversity in 5-HTR expression, these results suggest that the vPN neuronal class is likely more diverse than previously described.
Distinct populations of LNs express 5-HTRs
The majority of GABAergic cell bodies within the lateral neuroblast cluster are LNs. However, there have been reports of a small number (~1–2) of GABAergic latPNs20. Our approach could not objectively distinguish a GABAergic LN from a GABAergic latPN. Therefore, we make the assumption that GABAergic cell bodies in the lateral cell cluster are likely LNs, knowing that there are a small number of GABAergic latPNs20. However, there is a small subset of cholinergic LNs ventrolateral to the AL that are easily discernable, based on soma size, from cholinergic PNs34. There are ~200 LNs within the AL52 that express a diverse array of transmitters27 including glutamate50 and neuropeptides such as tachykinin (TKK) and myoinhibitory peptide (MIP)32,33, and vary in their synaptic connectivity with other AL neuron classes30,34,53,54.
Distinct subcategories of LNs, based on transmitter content, express distinct 5-HTRs (Fig. 5). The 5-HT1A is expressed by 13.63 ± 0.55 (n* = 3 transgenic lines, n = 17–18 brains per line) lateral LNs (Fig. 5a) whose cell bodies are consistently located in close proximity to the AL. Of these LNs, 12.40 ± 0.86 are GABAergic (Fig. 5b). In addition, a significant proportion of the 5-HT1A expressing LNs are peptidergic, with 8.62 ± 0.01 LNs expressing MIP (Fig. 5c) and 7.00 ± 0.26 expressing TKK (Fig. 5d). The 5-HT2A receptor is expressed by a smaller number of lateral LNs (4.27 ± 0.96, n = 11) relative to the 5-HT1A LNs (Fig. 5e). Of these, 3.73 ± 0.81 (n = 11) are GABAergic (Fig. 5f), 1.14 ± 0.10 (n = 11) are cholinergic (Fig. 5g), and none of the 5-HT2A LNs were TKKinergic (Fig. 5h). The 5-HT2B expressing lateral LNs (Fig. 5i), of which there are 12.42 ± 0.93 (n* = 2 transgenic lines, n = 25 and 20 brains per line), are primarily GABAergic (10.12 ± 0.78; Fig. 5j), although 2.30 ± 0.15 are cholinergic (Fig. 5k), and roughly a single (0.87 ± 0.68) TKKinergic LN (Fig. 5l). Finally, the 5-HT7 receptor is also expressed by lateral LNs (Fig. 5m; 12.19 ± 0.71, n = 16) which are predominantly GABAergic (Fig. 5n; 11.25 ± 0.69, n = 8), although a small number (4.64 ± 0.21, n = 7) are MIPergic (Fig. 5o) and 1.72 ± 0.15 (n = 9) TKKinergic (Fig. 5p).
To assess 5-HTR expression within the glutamatergic LNs that are ventral to the AL50, we performed RFP-GFP dual-expression experiments. In these cases, a Trojan-LexA::QFAD protein-trap line for vesicular glutamate transporter (VGlut) was used to produce GFP in all cells that produce VGlut55, simultaneously RFP is produced in all cells that produce a given 5-HTR via the T2A-GAL4 5-HTR driver (Fig. 6a). The 5-HT1A is expressed by 7.75 ± 0.43 (n* = 5-HT1A1468-T2A-G4, n = 10 brains) glutamatergic LNs (Fig. 6b). Similarly, the 5-HT1B is expressed by 6.89 ± 0.48 (n = 9 brains) glutamatergic LNs (Fig. 6c). The 5-HT2A is expressed by 3.72 ± 0.19 (n = 9 brains) glutamatergic LNs (Fig. 6d), while 5-HT2B is expressed by 9.75 ± 0.40 (n* = 5-HT2B5208-T2A-G4, n = 10 brains) glutamatergic LNs (Fig. 6e). Finally, 5-HT7 is expressed by 9.50 ± 0.54 (n = 8 brains) glutamatergic LNs (Fig. 6f).
Neuromodulators often act through diverse sets of receptors expressed by distinct network elements and in this manner, differentially affect specific features of network dynamics. Knowing which network elements express each receptor for a given neuromodulator provides a framework for making predictions about the mechanistic basis by which a neuromodulator alters network activity. In this study, we provide an “atlas” of 5-HTR expression within the AL of Drosophila, thus revealing network elements subject to the different effects of serotonergic modulation. In summary, we find that different receptors are predominantly expressed by distinct neuronal populations (Fig. 7a–d). For example, the 5-HT2B is expressed by ORNs (Fig. 7a), while the 5-HT2A and 7 are expressed by cholinergic PNs (Fig. 7b). Additionally, we find that each receptor is expressed by diverse populations of LNs, with the exception the 5-HT1B. For instance, 5-HT1A is expressed by GABAergic and peptidergic (TKK and MIP) LNs, while 5-HT2A and 2B are not expressed by peptidergic LNs (Fig. 7d). However, the vPNs are the exception to the general observation that distinct neuronal classes differ from each other in the 5-HTRs (Fig. 7c) and we discuss the implications of this below. Together, our results suggest that within the AL, 5-HT differentially modulates distinct populations of neurons that undertake specific tasks in olfactory processing.
A recurring theme of neuromodulation is that the expression of distinct receptor types by specific neural populations allows a single modulatory neuron to differentially affect individual coding features. For instance, GABAergic medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in the nucleus accumbens express either the D1 or D2 dopamine receptor allowing dopamine to have opposite effects on different MSNs via coupling to different Galpha subunits (reviewed in56). MSNs that differ in dopamine receptor expression also differ in their synaptic connectivity. Dopamine activates D1-expressing MSNs that directly inhibit dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), and inhibits D2-expressing MSNs that inhibit GABAergic VTA interneurons thus inducing suppression of dopamine release. In this manner, a single neuromodulator differentially affects two populations of principal neurons via different receptors to generate coordinated network output. This principle also holds true for the effects of 5-HT within the olfactory bulb. For instance, 5-HT enhances presynaptic inhibition of olfactory sensory neurons by 5-HT2C-expressing juxtaglomerular cells57, while increasing excitatory drive to mitral/tufted cells and periglomerular cells via 5-HT2A-expressing external tufted cells58. Similarly, we observed that distinct classes of AL neurons differ in their expression of 5-HTRs. For instance, ePNs express the 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B and 5-HT7 receptors (Fig. 3), while peptidergic LNs predominantly express the 5-HT1A receptor (Fig. 5c,d). This suggests that the cumulative effect of 5-HT results from a combination of differential modulation across neuronal populations within the AL. Interestingly, although we find that 5-HT2B is expressed by ORNs, previous reports found that 5-HT does not directly affect Drosophila ORNs11. In this study, ORNs were stimulated using antennal nerve shock in which the antennae were removed in order to place the antennal nerve within a suction electrode11. Thus, if 5-HT2B is localized to the ORN cell body, removal of the antennae would eliminate any effect of 5-HT on ORNs. In several insects, 5-HT within the antennal haemolymph modulates ORN odor-evoked responses59,60. Therefore, it is plausible ORNs are modulated by a source of 5-HT other than the CSD neurons within the AL.
Serotonergic modulation of LN activity has widespread, and sometimes odor specific, effects on olfactory processing. LNs allow ongoing activity across the AL to shape the activity of individual AL neurons, often in a glomerulus specific manner creating non-reciprocal relationships53,61,62,63. It is fairly clear that 5-HT directly modulates LNs, although 5-HT almost certainly affects synaptic input to LNs. Serotonin modulates isolated Manduca sexta LNs in vitro64 and, consistent with our results, a small population of GABAergic LNs in the AL of Manduca also express the 5-HT1A receptor65. Furthermore, 5-HT has odor-dependent effects on PN odor-evoked activity11,66, suggesting that odor specific sets of lateral interactions are modulated by 5-HT. We found that different populations of LNs expressed different sets of 5-HT receptors, however we categorized LNs based on transmitter type, so it is possible that these categories could be even further sub-divided based on morphological type, synaptic connectivity or biophysical characteristics26,27,30,34. Regardless, our results suggest that 5-HT modulates lateral interactions within the AL by selectively affecting LN populations that undertake different tasks. For instance, the TKKergic LNs that express the 5-HT1A receptor provide a form of gain control by presynaptically inhibiting ORNs32. Our results suggest that 5-HT may affect TKK mediated gain control differently relative to processes undertaken by other LN populations. Furthermore, the expression of the TKK receptor by ORNs is regulated by hunger, allowing the effects of TKK to vary with behavioral state67. It would be interesting to determine if the expression of 5-HTRs themselves also vary with behavioral state as a means of regulating neuromodulation within the olfactory system.
Although we primarily found that individual populations of AL neurons chiefly expressed a single or perhaps two 5-HTR types, the vPNs appear to be an exception. As a population, the vPNs express all of the 5-HTRs (Fig. 4) and the vPNs that express each 5-HTR did not appear to differ in terms of the proportion of those neurons that were GABAergic or cholinergic (roughly 3:2). Unfortunately, our approach does not allow us to determine the degree to which individual vPNs co-express 5-HTRs. However, it is estimated that there are ~51 vPNs and even if this is an underestimate, there is likely some overlap of receptor types as a large number of vPNs expressed the 5-HT1A, 1B, 2B and 7 receptors. It is possible that a single vPN expresses one 5-HTR in the AL and a different 5-HTR in the lateral horn. However, our approach only allows us to identify which neurons express a given 5-HTR, not where that receptor is expressed. The CSD neurons ramify throughout both ALs and both lateral horns35,36, thus vPNs could have differential spatial expression of individual 5-HTRs. Individual neurons expressing multiple 5-HTRs has been demonstrated in several neural networks. For instance, pyramidal cells in prefrontal cortex express both the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A7. This allows 5-HT to have opposing effects that differ in their time course in the same cell9,10,68. In terms of the vPNs, our results suggest that the current understanding of the diversity of this neuron class is limited. The expression of receptors for different signaling molecules could potentially be a significant component to vPN diversity.
Neuromodulators are often released by a small number of neurons within a network, yet they can have extremely diverse effects depending upon patterns of receptor expression. For the most part, individual populations of AL neurons differed in the receptor types that they expressed. This suggests that 5-HT differentially acts on classes of neurons that undertake distinct tasks in olfactory processing. In the case of the vPNs, this differential modulation may be fairly complex due to the diversity within this neuronal class. Our goal was to establish a functional atlas of 5-HTR expression in the AL of Drosophila. This dataset therefore provides a mechanistic framework for the effects of 5-HT on olfactory processing in this network.
Flies were maintained on standard cornmeal at 24 °C and under a 12:12 light:dark cycle. MiMIC T2A-GAL4 protein- and gene-trap stocks were graciously provided by Dr. H.A. Dierick and have been previously described42. These include: 5-HT1A-T2A-GAL4MI04464, 5-HT1A-T2A-GAL4MI01140, 5-HT1A-T2A-GAL4MI01468, 5-HT1B-T2A-GAL4MI05213, 5-HT2A-T2A-GAL4MI00459, 5-HT2B-T2A-GAL4MI05208, 5-HT2B-T2A-GAL4MI06500, and 5-HT7-GAL4MI00215. All 5-HT receptor protein-trap and gene-trap lines were crossed to membrane-targeted UAS-IVS-mCD8::GFP69 (BL32185). Dr. Tzumin Lee kindly provided the MZ699-GAL4 and GH146-LexA stocks49. The Trojan-LexA::QFAD VGlut protein-trap line55 (BL60314) recombined with y, w,10xUAS-RFP, LexAop-GFP (BL32229) was generously provided by Dr. Quentin Gaudry.
Brains were dissected in Drosophila external saline (CSHL recipe) fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes on ice, washed with phosphate buffered saline with 0.5% Triton-X 100 (PBST), and blocked for 1 hour in PBST with either 2% IgG-free BSA (Jackson Immunoresearch; Cat#001-000-162), or 5% NGS (for GABA & ChAT labeling; Jackson Immunoresearch; Cat#005-000-121). In many instances, an ascending-descending ethanol wash series (30%, 50%, 70%, 95%, 100%, 95%, 70%, 50%, 30%) was used prior to blocking to clear air from residual trachea. Brains were incubated at 4 °C in primary antibody diluted with blocking solution and 5mM sodium azide. Primary antibody dilutions used include: 1:50 mouse anti-Bruchpilot (DSHB; mAbnc8270), 1:500 rabbit anti-GABA (Sigma; Cat#A2052), 1:200 mouse anti-ChAT (DSHB; ChAT4B171), 1:5,000 rabbit anti-TKK (provided by Dr. Jan Veenstra72), 1:4,000 rabbit anti-MIP (provided by Dr. Christian Wegener73), and 1:1,000 rabbit anti-GFP (Life Technologies; Cat#A-11122). Brains were then washed in PBST, blocked as above, and incubated at 4 °C in secondary antibody diluted with blocking solution and 5mM sodium azide. All secondary antibodies were purchased from Life Technologies and include: goat anti-rabbit Alexa-488 (Cat#A-11008), donkey anti-rabbit Alexa-488 (Cat#A-21206), donkey anti-mouse Alexa-546 (Cat#A-10036), goat anti-mouse Alexa-546 (Cat#A-11030), goat anti-rabbit Alexa-633 (Cat#A-21070), and goat anti-mouse Alexa-633 (Cat#A-21050). Brains were then washed in PBST and PBS, then cleared via an ascending glycerol series (40%, 60%, 80%), and finally mounted on well slides in Vectashield® (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA; Cat#H-1200).
Image Acquisition and Analysis
Brains were imaged using an Olympus BX61 (Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan) confocal microscope running the Fluoview FV1000 software with a 40x UPlanFL-N or 60x PlanApo-N oil-immersion objective. In some cases, brightness and contrast were manually adjusted in Adobe Photoshop v.14.2 (San Jose, CA). GFP-positive and additional primary labeled cell bodies were recorded in VAA3D (v.3.20)74. Anterodorsal, lateral, and ventral PN and LNs were defined by cell body location49 and, in the case of the lateral PNs and LNs, transmitter content.
To demonstrate that 5-HT2B is expressed in both antennae and maxillary palp ORNs, the antennae, maxillary palps, or both were removed 4–5 hours post-eclosion. Animals were kept under standard conditions and media until 10-days later when they were processed for immunocytochemistry.
All statistics were performed in GraphPad Prism v.6.01 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). For simplicity, we use the average of the averages for multiple transgenic lines used for the same receptor (i.e. 5-HT1A and 5-HT2B) when reporting results. In these cases, data are presented as mean of the mean of each individual line ± mean of the s.e.m of each individual line (n* = total number of transgenic lines for a receptor, n = total number of brains for each transgenic line). All other data are presented as mean ± s.e.m (n = total number of brains). A D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test (α = 0.05) was used to confirm normal distribution of neuronal classes highlighted between the multiple lines for 5-HT1A and 2B. A one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s multiple comparison test (α = 0.05) was used to test for significant differences between the number of neurons within a neuronal class highlighted by the different 5-HT1A T2A-GAL4 lines. An unpaired Student’s t-test (α = 0.05) was performed to test for significant differences between the number of neurons within a neuron class highlighted by the different 5-HT2B T2A-GAL4 lines for the same 5-HTR.
How to cite this article: Sizemore, T. R. and Dacks, A. M. Serotonergic Modulation Differentially Targets Distinct Network Elements within the Antennal Lobe of Drosophila melanogaster. Sci. Rep. 6, 37119; doi: 10.1038/srep37119 (2016).
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
We would like to thank Dr. Herman Dierick for providing the MiMIC T2A-GAL4 fly stocks, Dr. Jan Veenstra for providing the TKK antibody and Dr. Christian Wegener for providing the MIP antibody which was developed by Dr. Manfred Eckert. We thank Dr. Tzumin Lee for providing the MZ699-GAL4 and GH146-LexA fly stocks. We also would like to thank Dr. Quentin Gaudry for the 10xUAS-RFP, LexAop-GFP;Trojan-LexA::QFAD VGlut protein-trap fly stock. Dr. Jing Wang provided insightful technical advice. Additionally, we would like to thank Dr. Christopher Potter, Kristyn M. Lizbinski and Kaylynn Coates for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by start-up funds from West Virginia University and a R03 DC013997-01 from the National Institutes of Health to A.M.D., and a Grant-In-Aid of Research from Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society to T.R.S.