Thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1) is a pivotal intracellular redox sensor and antioxidant enzyme. On the other hand, overexpression of TrxR1 is closely correlated with the initiation of various tumors including breast cancer, though the detailed mechanism remains unclear. Here we investigated the role of TrxR1 in dysplastic transformation of human breast epithelial cell line MCF-10A induced by chronic oxidative stress. Not surprisingly, sustained exposure to H2O2 significantly augmented the expression and activity of TrxR1 in MCF-10A cells. The dysplastically transformed MCF-10A (MCF-10AT) cells undergoing 8-week H2O2 treatment exhibited a certain degree of malignancy in tumorigenicity evaluation. Moreover, TrxR1 inhibitor ethaselen (BBSKE) could partially reverse some malignant phenotypes including epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) of MCF-10AT as well as MCF-7 cells. Collectively, our results supported the considerable involvement of TrxR1 in the onset of breast cancer and BBSKE may be a promising agent against breast cancer.
Breast cancer is one of the leading malignancies in women around the world1. Enormous advances have been made in the field of breast cancer research over the past decades; however, it is still not fully understood about the detailed mechanism for mammary carcinogenesis. Estrogens are shown to initiate breast cancer by stimulating cell proliferation2, activating oncogenes3, inactivating tumor suppressor genes4,5 and causing oxidative DNA damages in an estrogen receptor (ER)-dependent and independent manner6. Moreover, the direct action of estrogen or its metabolites on cellular mitochondria can also generate excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) accelerating the development and progression of breast cancer7. This off balance redox status of intracellular microenvironment is recognized as a pivotal phase in the process of mammary carcinogenesis as well as other tumorigenesis8.
It is generally known that there are several innate defense strategies (antioxidant enzymes, nonenzymatic antioxidants and physical barriers) aiming to overcome oxidative stress lesions. Nevertheless, overexpression or over-activation of certain antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase and thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) in response to exceeding amount of ROS in turn might contribute to tumor development9. Given the special metabolism circumstance of transformed cells or cancer cells compared with normal cells, the deregulation of ROS scavengers can be viewed as pro-survival adaptive changes, which appears to echo the latest standpoint that cancer is an evolutionary product affected by dynamic tissue environment not only by oncogenic mutations10.
TrxR is a selenium-containing oxidoreductase that is responsible for catalyzing the NADPH-dependent reduction reaction of thioredoxin (Trx) disulfide and a broad spectrum of oxidized protein substrates11. TrxR is closely related with multiple cellular processes such as antioxidation defense, redox signaling, cell proliferation and apoptosis12,13. Mammalian TrxR consists of three isoforms: TrxR1 in the cytoplasm, TrxR2 in the mitochondria, TrxR3 primarily expressed in the testes11. Despite wide expression of TrxR1 in numerous types of tissue cells, higher levels of TrxR1 have been observed in various malignancies including non-small cell lung carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma than in normal tissues. In fact, it has been demonstrated that TrxR1 plays an important part in tumor growth, progression, metastasis, and chemotherapy resistance14,15. Therefore, TrxR1 has emerged as a promising biomarker and drug target for oncotherapy. Currently, a substantial body of small molecule inhibitors against TrxR1 has been identified to be potential anti-cancer agents such as metal containing compounds and natural products16,17,18,19. Nonetheless, the role of TrxR1 in the onset of breast cancer remains to be elucidated.
Although a great deal of studies utilizing estrogens or estrogenic chemicals to induce breast carcinogenesis has been previously established in cell models such as human mammary epithelial cell line MCF-10A, few studies about the direct ROS-triggered dysplastic or malignant transformation of MCF-10A cells, especially about the involvement of TrxR1 in this process have been reported yet. We hypothesized that persistent rising levels of intracellular ROS ultimately lead to mammary tumorigenesis and deregulation of TrxR1 probably participates in the promotion of breast cancer. In this work, long-term exposure to H2O2 in MCF-10A cells was employed to simulate the imbalanced redox context in the initial phase of breast tumor. We aimed to assess the influence of chronic oxidative stress on TrxR1 expression and activity in transformed MCF-10A cells. Besides, the relationship between alterations of cellular phenotype and TrxR1 during this transformation course was examined as well. TrxR1 might facilitate the occurrence of certain dysplastic phenotypes associated with breast cancer.
Establishment of the cell model of mammary dysplasia
To determine the appropriate concentration of H2O2 to induce the chronic oxidative stress in MCF-10A cells, we first examined intracellular ROS content in MCF-10A cells treated with H2O2 along with its effect on cell viability. As shown in Fig. 1a, the ROS level was induced by H2O2 (20 μM to 100 μM) in a dose-dependent manner after 24-h treatment. Accordingly, the viability of MCF-10A cells was gradually inhibited by increasing concentrations of H2O2 ranged from 20 μM to 200 μM (Fig. 1b). It should be noted that 30 μM H2O2 generated statistical upregulation of ROS in MCF-10A compared with control cells, whereas this dose of H2O2 had no significant cytotoxicity to MCF-10A cells yet. Based on these results, we selected 30 μM of H2O2 as the dosage and 8 weeks as the time range in the following experiments to establish the cell model of dysplastically transformed human breast epithelial cell (MCF-10AT).
Morphological Changes of MCF-10A Cells Affected by Chronic Oxidative Stress
MCF-10A cells were incubated with 30 μM H2O2 for long-term treatment. During this course, there were obvious morphological variations of MCF-10A cells that became larger and more extended. The typical pictures of MCF-10A cells treated with H2O2 for 8 weeks and untreated MCF-10A cells were shown in Fig. 2a. Moreover, we observed the appearance of focal changes of MCF-10A cells after 6-week continuous exposure to H2O2 (Fig. 2b), which seems to be the MCF-10A transformed foci associated with oxidative microenvironment described in previous study20.
Characterization of Transformed MCF-10A Cells Induced by H2O2
We firstly evaluated the impact of chronic oxidative stress towards the proliferative and migratory ability of MCF-10A. Alamar blue assay (Fig. 3a) and colony formation assay (Fig. 3b,c) revealed that long-term H2O2 exposure increased the growth and survival ability of MCF-10A cells. As displayed in Fig. 3d, H2O2 treatment effectively stimulated the migration of MCF-10A cells. TrxR1 is generally believed to serve as a redox sensor of intracellular environment12,21. The anaerobic metabolism along with unbalanced redox state under the hypoxia conditions in cancer cells tends to aggravate the deregulation of those pivotal antioxidant enzymes including TrxR114,15, which was also validated in our current results. As displayed in Fig. 4a, the TrxR1 activity exhibited a time-dependent upregulation in MCF-10A cells upon prolonged exposure to H2O2 for 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks, suggesting TrxR1 as one of ROS scavengers in response to chronic oxidative stimuli. Despite continuous elevation of TrxR1 activity in MCF-10A cells treated with H2O2, its level in MCF-10AT cells was still clearly lower than basal TrxR1 activity of breast cancer cell line MCF-7 (P < 0.05), which might reflect high-grade malignance of MCF-7 cells. In consistent with TrxR1 activity results, TrxR1 protein level in MCF-10A cells also rose along with their exposure time (2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks) to H2O2. Moreover, the protein level of Trx, the most important substrates catalyzed by TrxR, showed a similar uptrend with TrxR1 in H2O2-treated MCF-10A cells (Fig. 4b). It has been reported that Trx antioxidant pathways work synergistically with glutathione to initiate tumor progression22. Accordingly, the GSH level in MCF-10A cells were sharply elevated, but still lower than that in MCF-7 cells (Fig. 4c). Collectively, from the perspective of Trx/TrxR system, H2O2-treated MCF-10A cells seemed to be gifted with certain properties distinguished from untreated MCF-10A cells.
Then we analyzed a panel of cellular characteristics of MCF-10AT cells induced by H2O2. As shown in Fig. 4d, higher levels of TrxR1 and Trx were observed in MCF-10AT cells relative to MCF-10A cells. Furthermore, the expression of epithelial marker E-Cadherin and mesenchymal marker N-Cadherin was evaluated by western blot analysis. N-Cadherin protein level was much higher in MCF-7 cells in comparison with MCF-10A and MCF-10AT cells where there was very little expression of N-Cadherin (Fig. 4e), which was clearly verified under confocal microscopy (Fig. 4i). On the other hand, western blot results displayed that E-Cadherin protein level was far below in MCF-7 cells compared to MCF-10A and MCF-10AT cells, however, there was no visible difference of E-Cadherin expression among them in immunofluorescence results. Cytokeratin 7 (CK7), widely recognized as classical biomarkers for pathologic diagnosis of cancer23,24, were markedly higher in MCF-10AT cells (Fig. 4e). Unexpectedly, CK7 expression quantity appeared to be less in MCF-7 cells than in MCF-10AT cells. As displayed in Fig. 4f,g, H2O2 exposure enhanced the protein levels of stem cell markers CD44, Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc in MCF-10A cells in various degrees, indicating that long-term oxidative stress increased the stem-like properties of MCF-10A cells. While these protein levels in MCF-10AT cells were still lower than in MCF-7 cells except no statistical difference of c-Myc expression between the two cell lines (Fig. 4g). Immunofluorescence results also confirmed that TrxR1 and CD44 content of MCF-10A cells was clearly less than that of MCF-7 cells, and H2O2 treatment could increase the protein expression of them in MCF-10A cells (Fig. 4h). Collectively, the chronic oxidative stress promoted dysplastic transformation in MCF-10A cells through the acquisition of stem cell and EMT characteristics.
Tumorigenicity Evaluation of MCF-10AT Cells in Nude Mice and human plasma TrxR1 activity assay
To further explore the features of MCF-10AT cells, xenograft tumor model was established by subcutaneously injecting MCF-10AT cells into athymic nude mice to evaluate their tumorigenicity. We observed that no mass or tumor could be observed in animals injected with MCF-10A cells. Meanwhile, four out of six (4/6) mice inoculated with MCF-10AT cells developed palpable mass in the injection site within one week. As positive control group, all the animals (6/6) injected with MCF-7 cells developed visible tumors within 3 days (Fig. 5a,b). Tumor volume of mice in positive control group was generally greater than those in animals injected with MCF-10AT cells (Fig. 5c).
Next, we performed histopathology and immunohistochemical analysis of tumor sections from above animals. HE staining results revealed that MCF-7 cells produced typical tumors in nude mice (Fig. 5e), while MCF-10AT cells formed breast epithelial hyperplasia and cysts in animals (Fig. 5d). Although MCF-10AT cells generated no obvious tumors in nude mice, they successfully survived and formed mammary gland ducts along with cyst-like structures, where these cells were positive for CK7 (Fig. 5d), suggesting MCF-10AT cells could maintain tumor-like growth property and present a certain degree of differentiation in nude mice. Likewise, CK7 was highly expressed in tumor tissues derived from MCF-7 cells exhibited epithelial feature (Fig. 5e). Besides, the proliferative rate was about 10–20% in MCF-10AT group assessed by Ki67 staining (Fig. 5d), while Ki67 was relatively higher expressed (20–30%) in the hotspot of tumor cells in MCF-7 group and a lot of mitotic figures were identified (Fig. 5e), indicating the active tumor proliferation. Additionally, P63 was expressed in part of the epithelial cells (MCF-10AT) of capsule wall (Fig. 5d), implying the existence of myoepithelial cells or intermediate type cells. Above all, high expression of TrxR1 was shown in tumor sections from both MCF-7 and MCF-10AT inoculated animals, though TrxR1 level was much higher in the former than in the latter (Fig. 5d,e). Moreover, there was a little reported phenomenon that frontier infiltration of TrxR1 was found in tumor tissues from MCF-7 cells (Fig. 5e), implicating that TrxR1 perhaps correlates with invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells.
Analysis of TrxR1 Activity in Human Plasma
In light of the potential of TrxR1 as a novel tumor biomarker, we compared the plasma TrxR1 activities of 241 female patients diagnosed as breast hyperplasia or breast cancer. According to the criteria published in 1990 [WHO Research on the menopause in the 1990s. World Health Organization Technical Report. 1996, 866], patients were divided into three age groups (age 35–44, 45–54 and 55+). Both breast hyperplasia and breast cancer group were similar for age distribution in each age group (P > 0.05), and there was no significant influence of age on TrxR1 activities in breast hyperplasia or breast cancer (P > 0.05). However, patients with breast cancer were reported to display a higher plasma TrxR1 activity compared with those with breast hyperplasia in all three age groups (Pre-menopause: P value = 0.0456, Z value = 0.02; Perimenopause: P value = 0.0168, Z value = 2.39; Post-menopause: P value = 0.0088, Z value = 2.62) (Table 1).
Effect of TrxR1 inhibitor BBSKE on MCF-10AT and MCF-7 cells
In consideration of the role of TrxR1 as a promising target for oncotherapy, it is reasonable to speculate that TrxR1 inhibitor may reverse dysplastic or malignant phenotype of cancer cells to some degree. The specific TrxR1 inhibitor ethaselen (1,2-[bis(1,2-benzisoselenazolone 3(2H)-ketone)] ethane, BBSKE) (Fig. 6a), a prospective anticancer agent developed by our laboratory25,26, was used to examine its effect on MCF-7, MCF-10 and MCF-10AT cells in the following experiments. Alamar blue assay results displayed that increasing concentrations of BBSKE (1, 2, 5, 10, 20 and 50 μM) reduced the viability of MCF-7, MCF-10AT and MCF-10A cells in a dose-dependent manner after 24-h treatment (Fig. 6b). Interestingly, the inhibitory effect of MCF-10AT and MCF-7 cells by BBSKE was obviously stronger than that of MCF-10A cells (Fig. 6b). The IC50 of BBSKE in MCF-7 and MCF-10AT cells after treatment for 24 hours was 4.1 μM and 3.9 μM respectively, while this value in MCF-10A cells was 7.8 μM, indicating that both MCF-7 and MCF-10AT cells were perhaps more sensitive to BBSKE treatment than MCF-10A cells. Besides, TrxR1 activity of both MCF-7 and MCF-10AT cells was sharply decreased by BBSKE treatment at 20 μM (P < 0.05) for 24 hours compared with corresponding control, although 5 μM BBSKE seemed to slightly augment TrxR1 activity (Fig. 6c).
Contrary to the inhibition of TrxR1 activity by BBSKE in MCF-7 and MCF-10AT cells, TrxR1 protein levels in these two cell lines were raised by BBSKE treatment in a concentration dependent manner (Fig. 6d,e). There was a significant induction of TrxR1 expression by BBSKE compared with corresponding control in MCF-7 and MCF-10AT cells (Fig. 6d,e), which might be recognized as a negative feedback upregulation of protein expression owing to its activity inhibition and this phenomenon is similar to other protein enzymes as previously reported27. Additionally, Trx protein expression was markedly diminished by 5, 10, 20 μM BBSKE in these three cell lines after 24-h exposure (Fig. 6d,f). Confocal images of TrxR1 in MCF-7 and MCF-10AT cells treated with BBSKE were basically coincident with western blot results, though the changes of TrxR1 staining intensity were relatively less significant under microscopy (Fig. 6g,h). It should be noted that N-Cadherin protein level of MCF-7 cells exposed to BBSKE for 24 hours was prominently lowered (Fig. 7a,b,f) whereas there was an apparent elevation of E-Cadherin protein expression caused by BBSKE in MCF-10AT cells (Fig. 7c,e,g). The E-Cadherin level in MCF-10A cells was also observed enhanced while the increment was not as high as that in MCF-10AT cells (Fig. 7c,d). In the context of the relevance of N-Cadherin to invasion and metastasis of carcinoma cells and downregulation of E-Cadherin in malignant cells compared to normal cells28,29, it makes sense that TrxR1 inhibition by BBSKE may bring about reversion of some dysplastic phenotypes.
Breast dysplasia is a premalignant lesion associated with approximately fourfold increased risk of subsequent breast cancer30,31. In this study we investigated the role of TrxR1 in dysplastic transformation of normal human breast epithelial cell line MCF-10A caused by chronic oxidative stress, and offered evidence that deregulation of TrxR1 expression and activity may be associated with dysplastic phenotypes of MCF-10AT cells as well as breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Considering the stronger growth inhibition aroused by TrxR1 specific inhibitor BBSKE in MCF-10AT and MCF-7 cells rather than MCF-10A cells, we hold that TrxR1 is an underlying target for managing mammary carcinoma. BBSKE not only inhibited TrxR1 activity in MCF-7 and MCF-10AT cells but also decreased the expression of other tumor-related proteins (i.e. Trx, N-Cadherin) in MCF-7 cells and increased E-Cadherin protein level in MCF-10AT cells, further supporting TrxR1 involvement in the pathogenesis of breast cancer.
Overexpression of TrxR1, which has been described in various malignancies and cancer cells is thought to be closely associated with tumor growth promotion, progression and metastasis32,33,34. Our study revealed that the elevation of TrxR1 expression and activity was accompanied with dysplastic transformation of MCF-10A cells induced by long-term H2O2 exposure, suggesting that immoderate stimulation of TrxR1 machinery owing to chronic oxidative stress is perhaps a critical factor to trigger carcinogenesis in mammary epithelial cells. In spite of such relevance of TrxR1 to tumor development, it does not mean that this protein is consistently favorable to tumorigenesis. Carlson et al. reported that TrxR1-knockout mice subjected to chemical carcinogen exhibited a significant higher incidence of liver cancer than that of wild-type mice35, which is probably attributed to the antioxidation defense of TrxR1 to remove carcinogenic oxidants or repaired oxidized proteins. Thus, moderate TrxR1 level or excessive expression of TrxR1 may result in distinct outcome of normal cells. Besides, our finding implicates the potential use of TrxR1 as a screening biomarker for cancer prevention. As shown in Table 1, there was a significantly higher plasma TrxR1 activity in breast cancer patients than those with breast hyperplasia. Nonetheless, given the fact that TrxR1 expression or activity tends to be influenced by multiple pathological or physiological factors, it is necessary to perform integrative analysis of individual’s genetic, clinical and lifestyle factors so as to meet next-generation personalized medicine requirements as proposed in another research regarding biomarker variation and establishment of individualized cutoffs36.
Trx system exerts anti-oxidation protection, pro-survival effect and/or inhibition of apoptosis in normal cells and cancer cells14. However, unlike TrxR1, the role of Trx1 in carcinoma has been somewhat controversial. It was reported that Trx1-transgenic mice showed extended life span over control mice but without apparent signs of malignancy37, while Trx1 facilitated the invasion and metastasis of salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma (SACC) cells through mediating TGF-β-induced EMT in xenograft mouse model38. In our study, there was a significantly higher Trx protein level in MCF-7 cells than in MCF-10A cells where Trx expression was induced obviously by H2O2 treatment in a time-dependent manner. Moreover, in line with the upregulation of N-Cadherin and downregulation of E-Cadherin in SACC cells with Trx1 overexpression38, the similar expression profile of N-Cadherin and E-Cadherin was also observed in MCF-7 cells with higher expression of TrxR1 and Trx compared with MCF-10A cells. Interestingly, TrxR1 exhibited the feature of frontier infiltration in immunohistochemical analysis of tumor sections from MCF-7 inoculated animals (Fig. 5e). Previous research demonstrated that primary tumor cells undergoing EMT, namely losing expression of epithelial markers (e.g., E-Cadherin and EpCAM) and acquiring mesenchymal markers including N-Cadherin, tend to be more aggressive and apt to metastasis28,29. Therefore, it is of great possibility that TrxR1 drives the progression of breast cancer by catalyzing Trx1 along with its related EMT processes, though this hypothesis clearly needs more evidence to be supported. Stemness characteristics are also usually observed promoted in the process of dysplastic transformation and tumorigenic potential enhancement induced by H2O239,40,41. In this study, four stem cell markers, (i.e. CD44, Oct4, Sox2 and c-Myc) were upregulated in MCF-10A cells after incubation with H2O2 for 8 weeks in accordance with the quantification results in Fig. 4g, which indicated that there could be a certain degree of dysplastic transformation in MCF-10AT cells, even if the differences appeared to be rather slight for CD44 and Sox2. Notably, the CD44 level was still far lower in MCF-10AT cells than MCF-7 cells, while the difference of c-Myc between the two cell lines was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).
Therapeutic implications of Trx system in cancer have been greatly studied, particularly with respect to the potential of TrxR1 as anti-cancer drug target14,15. Organoselenium compound BBSKE developed by our laboratory is a novel anticancer agent specifically inhibiting TrxR1 activity and is now under phase II clinical trial. There have been a series of reports regarding the antitumor efficacy of BBSKE alone or combined with other drugs against various malignancies in vivo and in vitro42,43,44, however, the effect of BBSKE on breast cancer cells is hardly known to date. Herein we observed that BBSKE significantly suppressed the growth of MCF-7 as well as MCF-10AT cells, whereas untreated MCF-10A cells were less susceptible to BBSKE treatment (Fig. 6b), suggesting the diverse sensitivity of antiproliferation effect of BBSKE between breast carcinoma cells and normal breast epithelial cells. In addition to the inhibition of TrxR1 activity, BBSKE sharply cut down the Trx protein expression in MCF-10AT and MCF-7 cells. Nevertheless, as mentioned above, TrxR1 inhibition may be just the reasonable response to the reduced Trx protein and not responsible for the decrease of total Trx protein amount. Thus there might be other unknown mechanisms accounting for this phenomenon. Another interesting observation from this study is that EMT was also markedly affected by BBSKE in MCF-10AT and MCF-7 cells. N-Cadherin of MCF-7 cells was significantly lessened and E-Cadherin in MCF-10AT cells was dramatically augmented under BBSKE treatment (Fig. 6d,e,f). These results are basically consistent with the impact of BBSKE on N-Cadherin/E-Cadherin protein levels in SACC cells38. In view of the close association between EMT and breast cancer metastasis45, BBSKE combined with other chemotherapeutics may be a promising strategy for reversing EMT and treating advanced breast malignancy.
In conclusion, our work demonstrates that chronic oxidative stress enables breast epithelial cells to undergo a certain degree of dysplastic transformation and deregulation of TrxR1 probably facilitate this pathological process, implicating the potential of TrxR1 as a diagnostic marker for breast cancer. Based on the susceptibility of MCF-7 and MCF-10AT cells to BBSKE, we can hypothesize that BBSKE or other kinds of TrxR1 inhibitors could be prospective chemotherapeutic agents for breast cancer treatment.
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) solution (3%, w/v) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ethaselen (BBSKE) (PCT: CN02-00412) was synthesized in our research group (State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, China) and dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to prepare a 20 mM stock solution. Both of them were freshly diluted by culture medium in all cell experiments. All other reagents utilized were acquired from standard commercial sources.
Cell culture and treatments
Human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 and mammary epithelial cell line MCF-10A were obtained from cell resources center of Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Beijing, China). MCF-7 cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Macgene, Beijing, China) supplemented with 10% FBS (PAN Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution. MCF-10A cells were cultured in phenol red-free DMEM-F12 (Macgene, Beijing, China) medium supplemented with 5% horse serum (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA), epidermal growth factor (20 ng/ml), hydrocortisone (500 ng/ml), insulin (10 μg/ml), cholera toxin (100 ng/ml) and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic mixture. Both cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. For chronic oxidative stress study, MCF-10A cells were exposed to H2O2 for 8 weeks, re-treated every 3 days and sub-cultured once a week.
Cell viability assay
Alamar Blue assay was used to assess cell viability. Briefly, cells growing in 96-well plates were exposed to 100 μl culture medium containing no drug or different concentrations of H2O2 or BBSKE. After required time, 10 μl of Alamar Blue assay reagent (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA) was added to each well and the plates were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 2.5 hours. Absorption values at 570 and 630 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer Magellan F50 (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland) and OD570–OD630 was counted as the actual fluorescence intensity.
Intracellular ROS was detected with 2′,7′-dichlorofluoroscein diacetate (DCFH-DA) fluorescent probe (Applygen Technologies, Beijing, China). About 106 cells in 6-well plates were incubated with 10 μM DCFH-DA at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 30 minutes, and resuspended in 1 ml PBS. The fluorescence intensity of DCF was measured at 488 nm (excitation wavelength) and 525 nm (emission wavelength) by flow cytometer (BD FACSCalibur, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Results were expressed as the mean fluorescence intensity of the analyzed cells.
Cell morphology observation
The morphology of the MCF-10A cells after H2O2 treatment was observed by bright field imaging. Cells were treated with indicated concentration of H2O2 for 0 to 8 weeks in 6-well plates. At certain time point cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and observed under microscope (Olympus IX83, Japan).
Western blot analysis
After indicated treatments, cells were lysed in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitor. BCA Assay (Applygen Technologies, Beijing, China) was employed to determine protein concentrations. The protein samples were then electrophoretically separated by a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. Then the membrane was blocked in 5% skimmed milk for 1 hour at room temperature. The desired primary antibodies of β-actin (ZSGB-Bio, 1:1000), TrxR1 (Abcam, 1:1800), CD44 (ABGENT, 1:1800), CK7 (Proteintech, 1:2000), E-Cadherin (BioLegend, 1:800), N-Cadherin (Biolegen, 1:800), Oct4 (Bioworld, 1:500), Sox2 (Bioworld, 1:1000), c-Myc (Bioworld, 1:500) and EGFR (ABGENT, 1:2000) were used to incubate with the membranes overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were then washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5000) for 1 hour at room temperature. Blots were visualized using the ECL kit (Advansta, Menlo Park, CA, USA). Band intensity was analyzed by Image Lab software, version 4.1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and β-actin was used as internal control for normalization.
Confocal immunofluorescence imaging
Cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 104/well on 4-well Lab-Teck II chamber slides (Nunc, Naperville, IL, USA). After indicated treatment, cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and fixed immediately with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 minutes at room temperature. After two washes with PBS, cells were permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes at room temperature. Then cells were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS/Tween 20 for 30 minutes at room temperature and further incubated overnight with the primary antibodies against TrxR1 (Abcam, 1:300), CD44-PE (eBioscience, 1:160), E-Cadherin (BioLegend, 1:300) or N-Cadherin (Biolegend, 1:300) diluted in 1% BSA in PBS/Tween 20 in a humidified chamber at 4 °C. After three rinses with PBS, secondary antibodies conjugated with Dylight 488, Dylight 649 or Dylight 549 (Abbkine, 1:300) diluted in 1% BSA in PBS/Tween 20 (1:200) was added and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature in dark followed by three washes with PBS. Subsequently, nucleus were counterstained with 4′,6′-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 10 minutes. Images were taken with a laser scanning confocal microscope (Nikon A1, Japan) and analyzed by NIS-Elements Viewer 4.20 software.
Colony Formation Assay
To analyze the influence of chronic H2O2 treatment on colony formation rate, cells were seeded in 6-well plates (250 cells/well). After cultured in complete medium for 7 days, cells were fixed with methanol and stained by 0.1% crystal violet for 30 minutes. The number of colonies in each group were counted then.
Wound healing analysis
Wound healing assay was performed to examine the effect of long term oxidative stress to the migration potential of MCF-10A cells. Cells were planted in 12-well at a density of 5 × 105/well and grown to 80% to 90% confluence. A scratch were then made using a sterile pipette tip to create a cell-free area in each well and cell monolayers were washed with PBS to remove the cell debris. All cells were then culture in serum-free medium for another 48 h. The wound regions were observed and pictured under IX83 microscope.
Determination of intracellular TrxR1 activity and GSH level
TrxR1 activity in cell extracts was determined under the DTNB (5,5′-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid) reduction assay. Different sources of cell lysates were collected with BCA assay used to quantify the protein concentration. A total volume of 80 μl reaction buffer (0.1 M PBS, 10 mM EDTA, 0.2 mg/ml BSA, pH 7.0–7.4) containing 50 μg protein was incubated with 20 μl 2 mM NADPH for 30 minutes at 37 °C in dark. 100 μl 10 mM DTNB was added to initiate the reaction afterwards. NADPH and DTNB were both dissolved in reaction buffer. The activity of TrxR1 was expressed by the linear increase rate of absorption values at 405 nm within the first 7.5 minutes. The intracellular GSH level was determined using GSH assay kit (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) following the manufacturer’s instruction.
Xenograft growth in nude mice
To evaluate the tumorigenicity of MCF-10A cells exposed to long term oxidative stress, xenograft model was made by subcutaneous injection of transformed MCF-10A (MCF-10AT) cells in athymic nude mice purchased from Laboratory Animal Department of Beijing University of Health Science Center. 4–5 week old female mice were randomized into three groups (6 mice in each group), which were inoculated subcutaneously in the right armpit with 100 μl PBS containing 107 MCF-10A, MCF-10AT or MCF-7 cells (as a positive control), respectively. All the mice were kept in standard laboratory conditions and provided with ad libitum food and water. General health of these animals was daily observed and tumor growth at the injection site was monitored by palpation. Tumor volume were measured and calculated using the formula: length × (width)2 × 0.5. After one week, all mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and tumors were removed, weighed and fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin.
Histopathology and immunohistochemical analysis
Tissues from nude mice were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections were dewaxed in xylene and gradually hydrated in graded ethanol. Antigen retrieval was achieved by microwaving in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 20 minutes. After that, Slides were soaked in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 25 minutes to block the endogenous peroxidase followed by 30 minutes block with 3% BSA. Sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-human Ki67 antibody (Abcam, 1:500), anti-human TrxR1 antibody (Abcam, 1:100), anti-human CK7 antibody (Proteintech, 1:100), and anti-human P63 antibody (Abcam, 1:100). After washing in PBS, sections were incubated with two-step plus Poly-HRP anti-mouse/rabbit IgG detection reagents (KPL, 1:200) for 1 hour and exposed to DAB (DAKO) for 2 minutes. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin for 3 minutes in, dehydrated in a graded alcohol solution, and mounted.
Human Plasma TrxR1 activity analysis
A retrospective cross-sectional study based on clinical database of Keaise Clinical Examination Lab was performed in Wuhan, Hubei province, China between June 1st, 2015 and December 31th, 2015. The study analyzed the plasma TrxR1 activities of 241 female patients aged >34 years and diagnosed as breast hyperplasia or breast cancer. Human Plasma TrxR1 activity was determined by DTNB reduction assay as described before46. A unit of TrxR1 activity was expressed as 1 micromole of NADPH oxidized to NADP+ in one minute under assay conditions.
The study protocol involving human participants was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Peking University. The methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. Informed consents were obtained from all patients.
The animal study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Peking University and was conformed to the principles expressed in “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (NIH, 1996). The methods were performed in accordance with “Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals” (Approved by State Science and Technology Commission, People’s Republic of China, 10/31/1988).
The statistical analyses of plasma TrxR1 activities between patients with breast cancer or breast hyperplasia were performed using Wilcoxon’s signed rank test. Significance values were calculated based on two-tailed tests, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The analyses were performed with SAS software, version 9.3. For the other experiments, data collected from three or four independent experiments were presented as mean values ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed using SPSS software, version 20.0. After the test of homogeneity of variances, statistical significance of mean values between multiple treatment groups (≥3) was determined by one-way ANOVA. Independent t-test (2-tailed) was performed to evaluate the difference between two groups. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
How to cite this article: Dong, C. et al. Role of thioredoxin reductase 1 in dysplastic transformation of human breast epithelial cells triggered by chronic oxidative stress. Sci. Rep. 6, 36860; doi: 10.1038/srep36860 (2016).
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Brody, J. G. et al. Environmental pollutants, diet, physical activity, body size, and breast cancer: where do we stand in research to identify opportunities for prevention? Cancer 109, 2627–2634 (2007).
Yager, J. D. & Davidson, N. E. Estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 354, 270–282 (2006).
Cavalieri, E., Frenkel, K., Liehr, J. G., Rogan, E. & Roy, D. Estrogens as endogenous genotoxic agents–DNA adducts and mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 75–93 (2000).
Lerebours, F. & Lidereau, R. Molecular alterations in sporadic breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 44, 121–141 (2002).
Li, J. et al. PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate cancer. Science 275, 1943–1947 (1997).
Yue, W., Yager, J. D., Wang, J. P., Jupe, E. R. & Santen, R. J. Estrogen receptor-dependent and independent mechanisms of breast cancer carcinogenesis. Steroids 78, 161–170 (2013).
Felty, Q. et al. Estrogen-induced mitochondrial reactive oxygen species as signal-transducing messengers. Biochemistry 44, 6900–6909 (2005).
Jezierska-Drutel, A., Rosenzweig, S. A. & Neumann, C. A. Role of oxidative stress and the microenvironment in breast cancer development and progression. Adv Cancer Res. 119, 107–125 (2013).
Roman, M., Jitaru, P. & Barbante, C. Selenium biochemistry and its role for human health. Metallomics 6, 25–54 (2014).
Rozhok, A. I. & DeGregori, J. Toward an evolutionary model of cancer: Considering the mechanisms that govern the fate of somatic mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, 8914–8921 (2015).
Arner, E. S. Focus on mammalian thioredoxin reductases–important selenoproteins with versatile functions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1790, 495–526 (2009).
Sun, Q. A. et al. Redox regulation of cell signaling by selenocysteine in mammalian thioredoxin reductases. J Biol Chem. 274, 24522–24530 (1999).
Lu, J. & Holmgren, A. Thioredoxin system in cell death progression. Antioxid Redox Signal 17, 1738–1747 (2012).
Mahmood, D. F., Abderrazak, A., El Hadri, K., Simmet, T. & Rouis, M. The thioredoxin system as a therapeutic target in human health and disease. Antioxid Redox Signal 19, 1266–1303 (2013).
Selenius, M., Rundlof, A. K., Olm, E., Fernandes, A. P. & Bjornstedt, M. Selenium and the selenoprotein thioredoxin reductase in the prevention, treatment and diagnostics of cancer. Antioxid Redox Signal 12, 867–880 (2010).
Cox, A. G., Brown, K. K., Arner, E. S. & Hampton, M. B. The thioredoxin reductase inhibitor auranofin triggers apoptosis through a Bax/Bak-dependent process that involves peroxiredoxin 3 oxidation. Biochem Pharmacol. 76, 1097–1109 (2008).
Becker, K., Herold-Mende, C., Park, J. J., Lowe, G. & Schirmer, R. H. Human thioredoxin reductase is efficiently inhibited by (2,2′:6′,2′ -terpyridine)platinum(II) complexes. Possible implications for a novel antitumor strategy. J Med Chem. 44, 2784–2792 (2001).
Duan, D., Zhang, J., Yao, J., Liu, Y. & Fang, J. Targeting Thioredoxin Reductase by Parthenolide Contributes to Inducing Apoptosis of HeLa Cells. J Biol Chem. 291, 10021–10031 (2016).
Zou, P. et al. Piperlongumine as a direct TrxR1 inhibitor with suppressive activity against gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 375, 114–126 (2016).
Yusuf, R. & Frenkel, K. Morphologic transformation of human breast epithelial cells MCF-10A: dependence on an oxidative microenvironment and estrogen/epidermal growth factor receptors. Cancer Cell Int. 10, 30 (2010).
Turanov, A. A. et al. Mammalian thioredoxin reductase 1: roles in redox homoeostasis and characterization of cellular targets. Biochem J. 430, 285–293 (2010).
Harris, I. S. et al. Glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidant pathways synergize to drive cancer initiation and progression. Cancer Cell. 27, 211–222 (2015).
de Deus Moura, R., Wludarski, S. C., Carvalho, F. M. & Bacchi, C. E. Immunohistochemistry applied to the differential diagnosis between ductal and lobular carcinoma of the breast. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 21, 1–12 (2013).
Reisenbichler, E. S., Ross, J. R. & Hameed, O. The clinical use of a P63/cytokeratin7/18/cytokeratin5/14 antibody cocktail in diagnostic breast pathology. Ann Diagn Pathol. 18, 313–318 (2014).
He, J. et al. Inhibition of thioredoxin reductase by a novel series of bis-1,2-benzisoselenazol-3(2H)-ones: Organoselenium compounds for cancer therapy. Bioorg Med Chem. 20, 3816–3827 (2012).
Wang, L. et al. Ethaselen: a potent mammalian thioredoxin reductase 1 inhibitor and novel organoselenium anticancer agent. Free Radic Biol Med. 52, 898–908 (2012).
Meiners, S. et al. Inhibition of proteasome activity induces concerted expression of proteasome genes and de novo formation of Mammalian proteasomes. J Biol Chem. 278, 21517–21525 (2003).
Cooke, V. G. et al. Pericyte depletion results in hypoxia-associated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis mediated by met signaling pathway. Cancer Cell 21, 66–81 (2012).
Zheng, H. et al. PKD1 phosphorylation-dependent degradation of SNAIL by SCF-FBXO11 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis. Cancer Cell 26, 358–373 (2014).
Hartmann, L. C. et al. Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 353, 229–237 (2005).
Degnim, A. C. et al. Stratification of breast cancer risk in women with atypia: a Mayo cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 25, 2671–2677 (2007).
Holmgren, A. & Lu, J. Thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase: current research with special reference to human disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 396, 120–124 (2010).
Lincoln, D. T., Ali Emadi, E. M., Tonissen, K. F. & Clarke, F. M. The thioredoxin-thioredoxin reductase system: over-expression in human cancer. Anticancer Res. 23, 2425–2433 (2003).
Lu, J., Chew, E. H. & Holmgren, A. Targeting thioredoxin reductase is a basis for cancer therapy by arsenic trioxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 12288–12293 (2007).
Carlson, B. A. et al. Thioredoxin reductase 1 protects against chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis via control of cellular redox homeostasis. Carcinogenesis 33, 1806–1813 (2012).
Enroth, S., Johansson, A., Enroth, S. B. & Gyllensten, U. Strong effects of genetic and lifestyle factors on biomarker variation and use of personalized cutoffs. Nat Commun. 5, 4684 (2014).
Mitsui, A. et al. Overexpression of human thioredoxin in transgenic mice controls oxidative stress and life span. Antioxid Redox Signal 4, 693–696 (2002).
Jiang, Y. et al. Thioredoxin 1 mediates TGF-beta-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma. Oncotarget 6, 25506–25519 (2015).
Kim, M. C., Cui, F. J. & Kim, Y. Hydrogen peroxide promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition and stemness in human malignant mesothelioma cells. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 14, 3625–3630 (2013).
Mahalingaiah, P. K., Ponnusamy, L. & Singh, K. P. Chronic oxidative stress leads to malignant transformation along with acquisition of stem cell characteristics, and epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human renal epithelial cells. J Cell Physiol. 230, 1916–1928 (2015).
Mahalingaiah, P. K. & Singh, K. P. Chronic oxidative stress increases growth and tumorigenic potential of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. PLoS One 9, e87371 (2014).
Zhao, F. et al. A thioredoxin reductase inhibitor induces growth inhibition and apoptosis in five cultured human carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Lett. 236, 46–53 (2006).
Tan, Q. et al. Augmented antitumor effects of combination therapy of cisplatin with ethaselen as a novel thioredoxin reductase inhibitor on human A549 cell in vivo. Invest New Drugs 28, 205–215 (2010).
Fu, J. N. et al. Thioredoxin reductase inhibitor ethaselen increases the drug sensitivity of the colon cancer cell line LoVo towards cisplatin via regulation of G1 phase and reversal of G2/M phase arrest. Invest New Drugs 29, 627–636 (2011).
Bill, R. & Christofori, G. The relevance of EMT in breast cancer metastasis: Correlation or causality? FEBS Lett. 589, 1577–1587 (2015).
Fu, Y. et al. Evaluation of thioredoxin reductase as a novel biomarker in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Journal of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences 23, 711–715 (2014).
We are grateful to Bo Xu for the help in confocal immunofluorescence imaging. Thanks to Yijie Zhao for the assistance in animal experiments. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (#81372266) of China.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Dong, C., Zhang, L., Sun, R. et al. Role of thioredoxin reductase 1 in dysplastic transformation of human breast epithelial cells triggered by chronic oxidative stress. Sci Rep 6, 36860 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36860
Thioredoxin‐1 as a biological predictive marker for selecting diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients for etoposide‐containing treatment
European Journal of Haematology (2020)
Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems (2020)
Synthesis of Novel Selenocyanates and Evaluation of Their Effect in Cultured Mouse Neurons Submitted to Oxidative Stress
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity (2020)
Scientific Reports (2019)
Thioredoxin Reductase as a Novel and Efficient Plasma Biomarker for the Detection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Large-scale, Multicenter study
Scientific Reports (2019)