In an electronic triode, the electron current emanating from the cathode is regulated by the electric potential on a grid between the cathode and the anode. Here we demonstrate a triode for single quantum magnetic field carriers, where the flow of individual magnetic vortices in a superconducting film is regulated by the magnetic potential of striae of soft magnetic strips deposited on the film surface. By rotating an applied in-plane field, the magnetic strip potential can be varied due to changes in the magnetic charges at the strip edges, allowing accelerated or retarded motion of magnetic vortices inside the superconductor. Scaling down our design and reducing the gap width between the magnetic stripes will enable controlled manipulation of individual vortices and creation of single flux quantum circuitry for novel high-speed low-power superconducting electronics.
Magnetic field in type II superconductors propagates in the form of Abrikosov vortices carrying single magnetic flux quanta1. One could draw an analogy with single electrons, which carry electric current in microcircuits that are the basic building blocks of contemporary semiconductor electronics. The principle enabler of today’s microchips is the transistor (solid state version of the triode), where the flow of electrons is regulated by voltage or current in the base or gate electrode. Depending on the sign and value of the electrode voltage, the flow of electrons is accelerated or blocked, thus allowing signal amplification or ON/OFF switching that provides the 0 and 1 states in digital operations for memory devices and computer logic circuits.
In this work we propose a device consisting of a superconducting (SC) film with striae of soft ferromagnetic (FM) strips, which can be used to regulate the flow of magnetic flux quanta by varying the magnetic potential at the strip edges with the application of an in-plane magnetic field. The idea of exploiting the controlled motion of Abrikosov vortices for fast, low-dissipation memory devices has been considered for some time2,3,4,5,6,7 and was revived recently by the work of the Stockholm group8. The flux quantization of vortices in superconductors makes them a natural nanoscale information carrier for digital electronics, and in particular, for vortex based memories and microprocessors. However, this approach to novel electronics did not receive much traction due to the lack of reliable implements for controlling and manipulating vortices at the individual flux quantum level.
Here, we propose a technique to precisely manipulate vortices using a tailored FM/SC hybrid architecture, thereby providing a crucial step towards the development of an Abrikosov vortex circuit. There is a vast literature on the properties of the FM/SC hybrids describing interaction of vortices with different patterns of magnetic elements on top of superconducting films, as thoroughly reviewed in refs 9, 10, 11. However, in the present work we consider an original design allowing new functionality that was not studied before. In this work, we used a few micron hybrid structures to allow optical imaging of the vortex dynamics. Nevertheless, the observed strong interactions of vortices with the magnetic strip edges will allow nano-scaling our designed features toward single vortex operation.
Results and Discussion
We studied the magnetic vortex motion in superconducting niobium (Nb) films overlayed with parallel thin strips of soft ferromagnetic permalloy (Py). The Nb film thickness was 100 nm (slightly above the London penetration depth of Nb, λ ~ 40 nm). The Py strips were 40 nm thick, 1.6 mm long, 30 μm wide and separated by 2 μm gaps. The strips possess in-plane magnetization with small anisotropy, which allows easy polarization along different in-plane directions. The striae of Py strips were lithographically patterned at the center of a 2 × 2 mm Nb square film, 200 μm from the square edges (Fig. 1).
A magneto-optical indicator film placed on top of the sample was used to image the normal magnetic flux component12. The sample was cooled below the SC transition temperature (Tc = 8.7 K) in the presence of an in-plane magnetic field (HX,Y) applied along a chosen direction with respect to the stripes. At temperature T < Tc, a field normal to the film surface (HZ) was applied and gradually ramped up. Images of the penetrating normal flux, visualized as a bright contrast that is proportional to the vortex density generated by HZ, were obtained using a cooled CCD camera and treated with image processing software. We subtracted the “zero-field” (HZ = 0) images taken below Tc from the Hz ≠ 0 images to ensure that we visualized only the new vortices entering the Nb film with increasing HZ and omit the alternating contrasts due to the stray fields of the magnetic Py strip edges.
At small enough HZ, the Meissner screening current prevents the vortices from entering the Nb film and hence enhances the imaged normal field at the perimeter of the square sample. At larger fields, vortices enter the Nb film and form the so-called Bean state with the vortex density decreasing from the edges towards the interior of the film. With increasing HZ, the vortex front advances closer to the boundaries of the magnetic Py strips.
Upon reaching the Py strips, the vortex motion pattern is qualitatively changed. At this stage, the vortex behavior becomes strongly dependent on the magnetic polarization of the Py strips. When the strips are magnetized along their width (by the in-plane field HX), effective positive and negative magnetic charges ( ρM = divM, where M is Py magnetization) appear at the long edges of the Py strips, and the sign of ρM alternates across the striae of Py strips as shown in Fig. 2a,b. For thin Py strips of thickness, d, with the in-plane magnetization polarized along their width, the long strip edges can be considered as lines of magnetic charge with charge density Md per unit length (Fig. 2b). In the gap space Δ = 2 μm between the Py strips, oppositely charged magnetic lines form linear dipoles (see Fig. 2a). However, for gaps much larger than the Py film thickness, Δ ≫ d, the charged lines at the long edges of the Py strips can be considered as solitary and the magnetic fields (HS) emanating from these edges decay radially as the inverse distance from the edges.
Below the superconducting transition temperature, the stray fields, Hs, at and between the Py strip edges, may be only partially screened due to the Meissner effect induced in the Nb film, resulting in the creation of vortices in the film. For SC films thicker than the penetration depth λ, where total screening is achieved, the field acting on the superconductor from a linear magnetic charge along the y-axis (at r = x + iz) can be estimated as13:
This formula predicts the stray fields that exist only in the half space above the Nb film in the case of the superconducting screening and have twice larger amplitude than the fields Hs in the absence of the screening at T > Tc which are symmetric in the space above and below the Nb layer. Accounting for the large magnetization of Py (M ~ 800 G) there will be strong local stray fields near each Py strip edges. Upon cooling the sample below TC, these stray fields will create positive vortices at the negative magnetically charged Py strip edges and negative vortices at the positive magnetically charged strip edges as indicated in Fig. 2a by the yellow arrows.
With the subsequent application of a normal field HZ, new (positive) vortices will be generated (green arrows in Fig. 2a). These vortices will interact with the Py strip edges as magnetic monopoles carrying charge 2Φ0/μ014. In turn, the Py strip edges will form lines of a local potential for vortices, U = ±∫2Φ0Hsdx, decreasing logarithmically with distance x from the edge and with a lower cut-off range x0 ~ λ. Furthermore, depending on the magnetic charge polarity, the potential can be either a barrier or an attractive potential well (Fig. 2a). In addition to this direct vortex/edge coupling, the entering vortices induced by Hz (Hz-vortices) will interact with the pre-existing vortices created during cooling in the stray field of the Py stripe edges (Hs-vortices). Near the positive magnetically charged Py strip edge, with the repulsive barrier towards positive Hz-vortices (U+ in Fig. 2a), the stray-field induced vortices are negative (down yellow arrow in Fig. 2a). These negative Hs-vortices will attract the entering positive Hz-vortices (green arrow in Fig. 2a) and annihilate them. In contrast, the positive Hs-vortices at the negative magnetically charged Py strip edge, will repel the entering Hz-vortices, while the local potential at this Py edge is attractive for the Hz-vortices (U- in Fig. 2a). Thus, the interaction between the entering Hz-vortices and stray field induced Hs-vortices is always opposite to the magnetic coupling of the Hz-vortices and the magnetically charged Py strip edges. However, as our experiments show (see below) the interactions of the Hz-vortices with the Hs-vortices turn out to be small and the coupling of the Hz-vortices with the charged stripe edges becomes the dominating factor in the vortex dynamics.
When the magnetic strips are polarized across their length (Fig. 2a,b), the local potential U at the strip gap consists of a linear barrier and linear valley along the opposing longitudinal strip edges (Fig. 2a). It contributes a substantial anisotropy to the vortex motion with preferential mobility along the linear potential, independent of the repulsive or attractive character of U. Indeed, we observe highly anisotropic deep penetration of vortices along the strip edges as shown in the magneto-optic image of the vortex field in Fig. 3a. This image confirms that in-plane polarization across the Py strip length induces channels for easy vortex entry along the strips. Such channels have a different nature compared to the channels of field-suppressed superconductivity formed e.g. due to the stray fields of domains at temperatures close to TC15. In our low-temperature case (T ~ TC/2), the main mechanism for channeling is the strong vortex motion anisotropy induced by the local linear potential landscape discussed above, rather than the suppression of superconductivity. The latter requires fields close to the upper critical field Hc2, while our values of Hs and Hz are well below Hc2 ~ 1.5 T at T ~ 5 K 16.
An intriguing situation emerges when the Py strips are polarized longitudinally. In this case magnetic charges appear at the short ends of the Py strips. They will be positive at one end and negative on the other (Fig. 2c). These charged strip ends create the same sharp attractive wells or repulsive barriers as noted above, but they are transverse to the motion of the HZ induced vortices entering from the nearest Nb film sides. In this case, the gaps between the strips serve as narrow gates for vortex entry, although, even in the gaps, the vortex motion will be in part, impeded by the overlapping stray fields from the neighboring strip ends. As a result, vortices will enter much slower from the narrow Py strip ends than from the longitudinal sides of the strip pattern.
The maximum force of vortex/strip-end interactions is expected to have the same value ~|dU(x0)/dx| for both + and − magnetic charge polarities at the strip ends. Surprisingly, it turns out that the effect on the motion of the Hz-vortices is quite different. The positively charged strip ends show a pronounced barrier action, preventing the motion of vortices (Fig. 3b). The enhanced bright color outside the positive magnetically charged Py stripe ends in Fig. 3b reveals a pileup of the Hz-vortices arriving from the Nb film edge. Dark triangles on the inner side of the Py strip ends correspond to the absence of vortices there. Some flux penetrates beyond the charged ends through the gaps between the strips and then expands symmetrically on both sides of the gap. Also, the amount of flux entering through the gaps is much smaller than in the case of cross-polarization of the strips (compare Fig. 3a,b taken with the same value of Hz).
In contrast to the positively charged magnetic strip ends, the attractive negatively charged ends are easily traversed by the entering Hz induced vortices as illustrated in Fig. 3c. There is a hardly visible small perturbation of the vortex density along the line of the negative strip ends in Fig. 3c.
Considering that entering Hz-vortices interact with both the magnetically charged Py strip ends and the associated magnetic stray-field induced vortices, and that these interactions compete with each other, the resulting effect should be defined by the dominant interaction. The strong vortex pileup at the positive Py strip ends in Fig. 3b confirms that here, the magnetic repulsion between the charged ends of the Py strip and the magnetic field of the HZ vortices is the main factor. This could also explain the observed weak effect of the negatively charged Py strip ends. Here, the positive Hz-vortices are not retarded by the positive Hs-vortices but are accelerated towards the negative stripe ends and kinetically cross over the narrow attractive valleys U-(x).
Finally, if the in-plane field is applied at π/4 from the long axis of the Py strips, we concurrently observe the combined effects of the cross and longitudinal polarized Py strips. i.e. the pile up of vortices at the ends of the strips and the channeling of vortices along the strip edges (Fig. 3d). In this case, magnetic charges are formed on all sides of the stripes (Fig. 3d’), such that one end and one long edge of the Py strip is charged positively and the other end and side have negative charge, resulting in the simultaneous pile-up and then channeling of vortices. Clearly the magnitude of both effects is different compared to the pure cross- or longitudinal polarization of the stripes.
The above experiments show that the cross polarization of the Py striae enhances vortex penetration, while longitudinal polarization can strongly suppress vortex entry. This array of thin magnetic strips with planar magnetization, which can easily be rotated with an in-plane field, acts as a grid for tuning the vortex motion. By turning the direction of the in-plane magnetic polarization of the Py strip with an in-plane magnetic field, it is possible to smoothly control the flow of vortex entry into the chosen area of the sample.
In summary, we have demonstrated that an array of parallel soft magnetic strips separated with narrow gaps is a unique structure allowing tunable manipulation of Abrikosov vortices in superconducting films. By rotating the magnetic moments of the Py strips, it is possible to switch from easy vortex channeling along the strip edges to strongly retarded flux entry between the strips. This is analogous to a magnetic triode operation, where a relatively small in-plane field can change the magnetic potential at the stripe edges allowing accurate control of the Abrikosov vortex motion. The action of the magnetic Py striae is similar to the work of a grid electrode regulating electron flow in electronic triodes. We envision that with appropriate miniaturization and choice of SC and soft FM components, our hybrid design can be used for developing superconducting single vortex circuits for digital and possibly quantum microprocessors, where high speed and low dissipating power are the leading requirements17,18.
The samples were prepared using 2-stage lithography technique. First, 2 × 2 mm Nb squares on silicon substrates were deposited by high vacuum DC magnetron sputtering onto a photoresist pattern manufactured using laser lithography. To inhibit proximity effects, after the lift-off process, the Nb squares were covered with ~15 nm SiO2 film using plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition system. Then the e-beam lithography was used to generate the patterns for 30 μm wide Py stripes with 2 μm gaps in the center of the Nb squares at 200 μm distance from the square edges. 40 nm thick Py film was deposited on top of the pattern followed by the lift-off. One of the Nb squares was left as a control sample.
The samples were placed on the cold finger of the optical closed-cycle cryostat ( Montana Instruments). They were covered with magneto-optical garnet indicator films and the normal component of the magnetic field in the samples producing the Faraday rotation of the light polarization in the film was imaged using a polarized light microscope9. Images of the flux patterns in the sample at different values of the normal field HZ were recorded with 16 bit CCD camera. The field HZ, was applied using a DC magnetic coil while the in-plane field HXY was produced by a couple of permanent magnets that could rotate around the HZ coil. The frame keeping the magnets allowed changing the distance between them and thus tuning the strength of HXY. The orientation and value of the fields was controlled with a Hall probe.
In the experiment, the in-plane field of a chosen strength between 20 and 150 Oe was applied along, across, or at π/4 with respect to the Py stripes at T > TC and was kept constant while the sample was cooled below TC. This ensured a stable polarization of the Py stripes in the in-plane field direction. When the sample was cooled to a desired T (temperature stability ~10 mK) the normal field was applied and the flux distributions were recorded at increasing HZ. By applying an in-plane field of 1 kOe to the control Nb square without Py stripes and imaging the penetration of the normal field HZ at T < TC we tested that HXY up to 1 kOe does not affect the dynamics of HZ vortices in our samples.
How to cite this article: Vlasko-Vlasov, V. K. et al. Triode for Magnetic Flux Quanta. Sci. Rep. 6, 36847; doi: 10.1038/srep36847 (2016).
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division. The work of F. Colauto at Argonne National Laboratory was supported by the Sao Paulo Research Foundation FAPESP (grant No. 2015/06.085-3). Use of the clean room at the Center for Nanoscale Materials was supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
About this article
Scientific Reports (2017)