Article | Open | Published:

Biodegradable Polycaprolactone as Ion Solvating Polymer for Solution-Processed Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 36643 (2016) | Download Citation


In this work, we demonstrate the use of the biodegradable polymer polycaprolactone (PCL) as the ion solvating polymer in solution-processed light-emitting electrochemical cells (LEC). We show that the inclusion of PCL in the active layer yields higher ionic conductivities and thus contributes to a rapid formation of the dynamic p-i-n junction and reduction of operating voltages. PCL shows no phase separation with the emitter polymer and reduces film roughness. The devices show light-emission at voltages as low as 3.2 V and lifetimes on the order of 30 h operating above 150 cd m2 with turn-on times <20 s and current and luminous efficacies of 3.2 Cd A−1 and 1.5 lm W−1 respectively.


The current rate of technology development has accelerated the rate of acquisition and disposal of electronics that rapidly become obsolete in a matter of several months, causing serious pollution1. In 2014 alone 41.8 million tons of electronic waste (e-waste) were produced worldwide2 and the number is expected to grow to approximately 65.4 million tonnes by 20173. From this amount of e-waste, only a fraction (<25%) is expected to be recycled4.

The research field of green electronics is currently being developed in order to realize the fabrication of biodegradable and biocompatible optoelectronic devices. The development of biodegradable substrates and electrodes, in recent years, demonstrates important and enabling results since these components represent the main bulk of the device5,6,7. These biodegradable devices will enable the use of electronic products that can decompose after their useful lifetime without a negative footprint on the environment8,9,10. The field of organic electronics offers a broad spectrum of tools for the sustainable development of new technologies. Possibilities range from efficient design of functional materials to the use of naturally occurring materials for the fabrication of electronic devices as well as the potential low-cost fabrication of electronic components through high-throughput printing techniques11. Problems associated with some organic electronics, such as limited lifetimes12, might not apply to applications where biodegradable materials are desirable.

Early work by Irimia-Vladu et al.8,10 demonstrated impressive results from naturally sourced materials such as indigo or beta-carotene for the fabrication of organic-field effect transistors. A promising architecture for the incorporation of biodegradable constituents are organic light-emitting devices that show efficient planar electroluminescence and work on flexible substrates. Applications include smart packaging, which demands economic and ecological components for monitoring or advertising13, and custom fit disposable medical devices that can be used for phototherapy14. The more common organic light-emitting diode (OLED)15 requires functional multi-layer stacks and air-sensitive electron injection materials to reach high performances. To date, electroluminescence of light emitting biomolecules has only yielded small quantum efficiencies, on the order of 10−716. However, biodegradable materials could be effectually utilized within OLEDs. For instance, deoxyribonucleic acid was used as an emission layer matrix molecule or as charge blocking layer17,18. In 2015, Weber et al.19 used the reemission of different natural fluorescent proteins for successful colour tuning of conventional inorganic light-emitting diodes. Nonetheless, fully biodegradable OLEDs demand biodegradable replacements of various required components to fabricate the complete multilayer architecture.

An advantageous alternative to the OLED is the fabrication of a similar device, the light-emitting electrochemical cell (LEC)20. Unlike OLEDs, no reports of LECs with biodegradable constituents have been reported to date. In LECs, the combination of salt ions and emitter molecules form a p-i-n junction in situ under an applied bias by electrochemical doping at the electrode interface21. Hence, LEC’s active material can consist of only a single layer sandwiched between air stable electrodes. The addition of an ion solvating solid polymer causes a liquid-like environment around the ions, creating the so-called solid polymer electrolyte (SPE), assuring a homogenous ion distribution within the active layer22,23. Poly(ethylene) oxide is the most commonly used ion solvating polymer20. New approaches use oligoethers like the star branched trimethylolpropane ethoxylate derivatives for high performance LECs24. Many investigations of SPEs based on biopolymers have been reported, e.g. chitosan, gelatine or agar, however processing was done from aqueous solutions whereas the majority of organic emitters are only soluble in non-polar solvents25,26,27.

In this work, we demonstrate the use of polycaprolactone (PCL) as a biodegradable ion solvating polymer for solution-processed LECs. PCL is currently being used as the basis of scaffolds for tissue engineering and drug delivery carrier in vivo28 and has been proven to be biodegradable by hydrolysis of the backbone ester bonds by enzymes in soil or water29,30. PCL is soluble in organic solvents and has already shown applicability in SPEs31. Herein we show that PCL provides a broad electrochemical stability window (ESW), good ion solvating properties contributing to higher ionic conductivities in the active material and thus a rapid formation of the dynamic p-i-n junction and reduction of operating voltages. Solution-processed LEC devices show light-emission at voltages as low as 3.2 V and lifetimes on the order of 30 h operating above 150 cd m2, demonstrating that PCL can be used as an ion solvating polymer.

Results and Discussion

An important aspect for the LEC’s device performance is the electrochemical stability of the SPE. Irreversible side reactions of the SPE under device operation can hinder the doping of the organic semiconductor and adversely affect device characteristics32. Thus, the long term operational stability of LECs is greatly dependent on the ESW of PCL and whether or not it encloses the redox potentials of the emitting semiconductor, in the present case a commercial PPV derivative known as Super Yellow (SY)33.

Figure 1 shows the cyclic voltammogram of PCL in acetonitrile as well as the oxidation (p doping) and reduction (n doping) potentials of SY as reported in literature vs. Ferrocene (Fc/Fc+)34. Tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6) was used as the supporting electrolyte. PCL shows an irreversible oxidation peak with an onset of 1.1 V and no reduction reaction in between the ESW of TBAPF6, so the reduction potential of PCL should lie at lower voltages. Hence, the ESW of PCL is wide enough to allow doping of SY without degrading.

Figure 1: Cyclic voltammogram of PCL in acetonitrile with TBAPF6 as the supporting electrolyte vs. Fc/Fc+.
Figure 1

PCL irreversibly oxidizes at 1.1 V and shows no reduction within the ESW of TBAPF6. The red dotted lines mark the SY redox potentials 0.5 V and −2.2 V34.

In order to investigate the ionic conductivity of PCL in sandwich device LECs, we studied a series of pristine LECs of two pixels on two different substrates (four total devices) with an active layer composed of PCL and tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate (TBABF4) as the SPE blended with the light-emitting SY. Though, the authors do not know of any studies of the biodegradability of SY and TBABF4, the use of these materials will enable benchmarking of the performance of PCL to known blends. We measured the samples by impedance spectroscopy at 50 mV AC and 0 V DC bias, with typical results shown in Fig. 2. Munar et al. have shown that this technique is an appropriate method for determining key processes including the ionic conductivity35. The equivalent circuit consists of a constant phase element (CPE) representing the geometric capacitance of the electrodes CPEgeom in parallel to the ionic resistance Ri and the electrode-interlayer capacitance CPEint due to the electric double layers. In our work, we extended this model by a parallel Rgb-CPEgb-circuit considering grain boundary effects of phases with different ionic mobility suggested by Huggins et al.36. The full circuit can be seen in the inset of Fig. 2(b). Figure 2(a) shows the Nyquist plots for a typical device at each of the varying PCL fractions, X, with constant fractions 1 and 0.2 for SY and TBABF4 respectively of each fraction. By fitting the equivalent circuit, we could extract the ionic resistance Ri. All parameters of the shown fits can be seen in Supplementary Table S1. With an active area A = 24 mm2 and the measured thicknesses d, see Table 1, we calculated the ionic conductivity using σi = d (ARi)−1, which is shown in Fig. 2(b). It is clear that the inclusion of PCL increased the ionic conductivity in the active layer by up to four orders of magnitude compared to the sample with no PCL, reaching a value of 2.6 10−7 S cm−1 for 0.3 parts of PCL. This result stands in very good agreement to comparable studies, where ionic conductivities of up to 10−4 S cm−1 for pure PCL-based SPEs were measured. Therefore, this improvement can be accredited with a more facile movement of the TBABF4 ions dissolved within the PCL and SY blend.

Figure 2: Impedance spectroscopy measurement of pristine SY:PCL:TBABF4 LECs show increased ionic conductivity with PCL ratio.
Figure 2

(a) Nyquist plots of a representative device measured with a 50 mV AC signal and 0 V DC bias. The inset shows an enlargement of the measurements with higher ionic conductivity. (b) Calculated ionic conductivity with s.d. of two pristine pixels on two different substrates (four total devices). The inset shows the equivalent circuit diagram36 used to fit the Nyquist plots in (a), where Ri models the ionic resistance.

Table 1: LIV Characteristics of SY:PCL:TBABF4 (1:X:0.2) LECs measured at 100 mV s−1 with s.d. of two pristine pixels on two different substrates (four total devices).

The influence of the enhancement of the ionic conductivity by PCL on the device operational parameters were determined with luminance-current-voltage (LIV) measurements. Table 1 presents the LIV characteristic’s average of again two pristine pixels on two different substrates (four total devices), each using a voltage sweep rate of 100 mV s−1. The correspondent LIV curves can be seen in Supplementary Figure S1. It was observed that increasing the PCL content, while keeping a constant SY:TBABF4 ratio of 1:0.2, leads to a reduction of the turn-on voltage from 5.5 V to 3.2 V suggesting a more effective dynamic formation of the p- and n-doped region within the devices due to the improved ionic mobility. The turn-on voltage was defined as the voltage needed to achieve a luminance greater than 1 cd m−2. The device current efficacy and luminous efficacy for 100 and 1000 cd m−2 improved and, in addition, the turn-on behaviour was more consistent with PCL. It is important to point out that the SY:TBABF4 ratio of 1:0.2 was chosen because it showed the lowest turn-on voltage compared to 0.1 or 0.3 parts of TBABF4, which can be seen in Supplementary Figure S1. A Supplementary Video of the operating devices and the derivative of the luminance voltage characteristic (see Supplementary Figure S2) can be seen.

For a more concrete understanding of the device operation, we characterized the light-emitting layers. The film morphology and, in particular, the intermixing of the SPE and the emitter material have been reported to be crucial to LEC device performance37,38,39. Different parameters such as crystallization, molecular weight, hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity can affect the miscibility of the SPE and the emitter. Phase separation of the two components will lead to an inhomogeneous distribution of ions within the film, affecting the efficiency of p-i-n junction formation, and in addition, creating regions in which the lack of emitter material will result in no light emission. A comparison of the film morphology between the different active layers is presented in Fig. 3 by means of photoluminescence (PL), dark field and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Figure 3(a) presents the PL image of a SY:TBABF4 film with 1:0.2 weight ratio. The image shows the fluorescent regions where the SY emission is observable as well as darker regions, which suggest the presence of TBABF4 agglomerates. A dark field microscopy image of the same region on the sample is presented in the corresponding inset. The image indicates the existence of a broad number of light-scattering features. This inhomogeneous distribution of the salt supports the supposition that the low ionic mobility and consequently the lower device performance compared to samples with PCL inside arises from poor salt solubility in SY. The microscopy images of samples with 0.05 and 0.1 parts of PCL are presented in Fig. 3(b,c) respectively. The PL microscopy images present a homogeneous fluorescence distribution with only a few small agglomerates while the dark field images show the almost complete removal of light scattering agglomerates. In this case, the ion solvating capabilities of PCL lead to a complete dissolution of the TBABF4 agglomerates resulting in a, presumably, uniform ion distribution throughout the full active layer. Furthermore, SY and PCL completely intermix and do not form phase separation even for higher parts of up to 0.3 parts of PCL as shown in Supplementary Figures S3 and S4. Consequently, the favourable miscibility of PCL with SY and the improved salt distribution is accompanied by a higher mobility of the ions, which resulted in the observed reduction of the operational voltage.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Photoluminescence microscopy, dark field optical microscopy (inset) (a–c) and AFM pictures (d–f) of SY:PCL:TBABF4 films on ITO and glass respectively with the ratios 1:0.00:0.2 (a,d), 1:0.05:0.2 (b,e) and 1:0.10:0.2 (c,f). The maximum height of the AFM profiles is z0 = 20 nm and the area root mean squared roughness Sq of the AFM pictures is shown in the pictures.

AFM images of SY with only salt and with salt and 0.05 or 0.1 parts PCL are shown in Fig. 3(d–f) respectively. The area root mean squared roughness Sq of the sample with salt and without PCL Sq = 3.4 nm has drastically increased in comparison to pristine SY films with Sq = 0.4 nm as shown in Supplementary Figure S5. This higher roughness can be traced back to the salt agglomerates. By adding PCL, the surface smooths, reducing the roughness to Sq = 1.6 nm and Sq = 1.4 nm for 0.05 and 0.1 parts of PCL, respectively, due primarily to the solvation of the ions (i.e. loss of salt aggregates).

Finally, the effect of PCL on the LEC device performance was determined. Figure 4 shows the lifetime characteristics of the LECs with the same examined ratios as above. The devices were pulsed current driven at a current density of J = 8.33 mA cm−2 and a frequency of 1000 Hz with a 50% duty cycle after a linear 4 s current ramp to establish the operating current density. A visual comparison of a pixel without (Fig. 4a) and with 0.05 parts PCL (Fig. 4b) at 5 s after start of the pulsed lifetime measurement clearly shows the faster turn-on behaviour. The pixel with PCL appears brighter as it turns on faster. This is also seen in Fig. 4(c), which shows the luminance and voltage of the LECs plotted over time. The lifetime (t50) was defined as the time taken for the luminance to drop to half of the maximum achieved luminance, which was accompanied by the respective increase in operational voltage as the device deteriorates. We determined that the sample containing no PCL reached a lifetime of t50 ≈ 7 h and maximum luminance Lmax = 142 cd m−2.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Emitting 4 mm by 6 mm pixels of SY:PCL:TBABF4 LECs without (a) and with 0.05 parts PCL (b) at 5 s of the lifetime measurement shown in (c). Current-voltage-luminescence-time (c) lifetime measurement of LECs with different PCL concentrations. The curves were recorded with pulsed current driving scheme (J = 8.33 mA cm−2) at 1000 Hz with 50% duty cycle. The solid and dashed lines represent the evolution of the luminance and the operational voltage, respectively.

The inclusion of the 0.05 parts of PCL was observed to extend the device lifetime four fold to t50 ≈ 32 h and exhibited a Lmax = 245 cd m−2. A further increase in the PCL content to 0.1 achieved a higher Lmax = 262 cd m−2, however, reduced the lifetime to t50  ≈ 20 h. Additional inclusion of PCL was observed to further decrease the operational lifetime down to t50 ≈ 16 h and the maximum luminance to Lmax = 202 cd m−2 for the sample with 0.3 parts of PCL. The turn-on time (ton) was defined as the time to reach 100 cd m−2. The device without PCL showed a turn-on time of ton = 16 min. 0.05 parts of PCL already reduced the turn-on time to ton = 23 s. Further increase in PCL ratio lead to turn-on times ton < 20 s. PCL also showed a positive influence on the current efficacy and luminous efficacy. The device with 0.1 parts PCL reached a maximum of 3.2 Cd A−1 and 1.5 lm W−1 in current and luminous efficacy respectively whereas the device without PCL reached 1.7 Cd A−1 and 0.8 lm W−1. The equivalent chronological sequence can be seen in Supplementary Figure S6. After lifetime testing, visual inspection of the pixels showed that the characteristic yellow colour of SY had vanished from the active area of all devices containing PCL. This discoloration and the voltage increase suggest a destruction of the conjugated polymer by electrochemical reactions with TBABF4 which seems to limit the performance as indicated in the cyclic voltammogram of TBABF4 in Figure S7. These undesired electrochemical reactions with TBABF4 may be the reason why the lifetime decreases with increasing the PCL content above 0.05 parts. As the overall amount of SY in the active layer decreases with increasing PCL content, the reaction with SY likely occurs faster when there is less SY inside. However, PCL leads to an efficient increase in lifetime, maximum luminance and turn-on time of LEC devices.

Taking everything into account, LECs with PCL could not reach performances of state of the art LECs with several hundred hours in lifetime or above 10 cd A−1 or lm W−1 in current and luminous efficacy respectively24 but most importantly showed very fast turn-on times and a homogenous light distribution. In addition, the broad ESW of PCL enables options of combining PCL with even higher bandgap emitter materials. Considering device preparation and operation in ambient conditions, the reached lifetimes of 30 h fulfil the demands of biodegradable short use devices.


In summary, we demonstrated the use of the biodegradable polymer PCL as ion solvating polymer in the active layer of solution-processed LECs. PCL showed good miscibility with the polymeric emitter and excellent ion solvating capability allowing for faster turn-on times and increased operational lifetimes. Nevertheless, further use of more electrochemically stable salts should overcome this limitation. The present demonstration of the use of biodegradable polymers as part of the emitter layer for luminescent devices is an important step for pushing the boundaries of biodegradable components. Future research efforts will be aimed at the replacement of the conjugated polymer and salt by biodegradable counterparts in order to achieve a completely bio emission layer. Fully biodegradable devices can contribute to a sustainable production of consumption electronics and furthermore access new pathways for biocompatible electronics research.



All the materials to produce the devices were purchased and used as received. Super Yellow (SY, Livilux PDY-132) was purchased from Merck. Polycaprolactone (PCL, Mw = 14 000 g mol−1), tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate (TBABF4, ≥99%) and anisole (≥99%) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Pre-structured Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) coated electronic grade glass (180 nm, 10 Ω □−1) was acquired from Kintec.

LEC Fabrication and Characterization

SY, PCL and TBABF4 were separately dissolved in anisole solutions with a concentration of 10 g l−1 that were intermixed at the relevant weight ratios and shaken for 24 h. ITO substrates were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath for 10 min in acetone and isopropanol respectively followed by 5 min oxygen plasma treatment. The SY:PCL:TBABF4 active layers were spin-coated in two steps at 1700 rpm for 45 s and 3500 rpm for 10 s and annealed in a vacuum oven at 40 °C and 10 mbar for 2 h afterwards. A 100 nm silver electrode was thermally evaporated through a shadow mask at 10−6 mbar yielding a 24 mm2 active area.

For LEC characterization, calibrated Botest LIV functionality and OLT lifetime test systems were used. Luminance-current-voltage (LIV) characterizations were measured with a 100 mV s−1 sweeping rate. Lifetime (LT) data was collected in a pulsed current mode at 8.33 mA cm−2 and 1000 Hz with a 50% duty cycle after a linear 4 s current ramp to establish the operating current density. The pictures of the emitting pixels were taken with a dnt DigiMicro Scale.

Impedance spectroscopy measurements were carried out on an Autolab PGSTAT302N potentiostat. A 50 mV AC voltage signal was used to measure the device impedance with the frequency varying from 104 to 0.05 Hz at 0 V bias.

Film Characterization

Optical microscopy pictures were taken with a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope with LU Plan Fluor 50x objectives and an Intensilight C HGFI Pre-centered Fiber Illuminator with an 380–600 nm mercury lamp and an EPI-FL B 2E/C filter for fluorescence microscopy. Atomic force microscopy was done with a Semilab DME Compact Granite DS 95 SPM Head. Film thicknesses were determined using a Veeco Dektak 150 profilometer.

Cyclic Voltammetry

Platinum working and counter electrodes were used in combination with a silver wire reference electrode vs. ferrocene Fc/Fc+ in acetonitrile (>99.9%, Sigma Aldrich) with 0.1 mol l−1 tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6, ≥99.0%) as the supporting electrolyte under nitrogen atmosphere. The measurements were performed using an Autolab PGSTAT302N potentiostat.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Jürgensen, N. et al. Biodegradable Polycaprolactone as Ion Solvating Polymer for Solution-Processed Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 36643; doi: 10.1038/srep36643 (2016).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    et al. RCRA toxicity characterization of discarded electronic devices. Environmental science & technology 40, 2721–2726 (2006).

  2. 2.

    et al. E-Waste and Harm to Vulnerable Populations: A Growing Global Problem. Environmental health perspectives 124, 550–555 (2016).

  3. 3.

    , , & Tracking the global generation and exports of e-waste. Do existing estimates add up? Environmental science & technology 48, 8735–8743 (2014).

  4. 4.

    E-waste: an assessment of global production and environmental impacts. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 183–191 (2009).

  5. 5.

    et al. High-performance green flexible electronics based on biodegradable cellulose nanofibril paper. Nature communications 6 (2015).

  6. 6.

    , & Electrically conducting biodegradable polymer composites (polylactide-polypyrrole and polycaprolactone-polypyrrole) for passive resonant circuits. Polymer Engineering & Science 53, 1196–1208 (2013).

  7. 7.

    , , , & Comparison of biodegradable substrates for printed organic electronic devices. Cellulose doi: 10.1007/s10570–016–1049–0 (2016).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Green and biodegradable electronics. Materials Today 15, 340–346 (2012).

  9. 9.

    et al. Flexible organic electronics in biology: materials and devices. Advanced Materials 27, 7493–7527 (2015).

  10. 10.

    “Green” electronics: biodegradable and biocompatible materials and devices for sustainable future. Chemical Society Reviews 43, 588–610 (2014).

  11. 11.

    , & Roll-to-Roll fabrication of large area functional organic materials. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics 51, 16–34 (2013).

  12. 12.

    et al. On the Limited Operational Lifetime of Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells. Advanced Materials 20, 1744–1749 (2008).

  13. 13.

    et al. Towards roll-to-roll fabrication of electronics, optics, and optoelectronics for smart and intelligent packaging. in Integrated Optoelectronic Devices 2004, 77–85 (2004).

  14. 14.

    , & Phototherapy with blue (415 nm) and red (660 nm) light in the treatment of acne vulgaris. British Journal of Dermatology 142, 973–978 (2000).

  15. 15.

    & Organic electroluminescent diodes. Applied Physics Letters 51, 913–915 (1987).

  16. 16.

    et al. Light-emitting diodes fabricated from biomolecular compounds. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 284, 61–65 (2006).

  17. 17.

    et al. A significant improvement of luminance vs current density efficiency of a BioLED. Optical Materials 36, 1027–1033 (2014).

  18. 18.

    DNA-a new material for photonics? Nature Photonics 1, 3 (2007).

  19. 19.

    et al. Bioinspired Hybrid White Light-Emitting Diodes. Advanced Materials 27, 5493–5498 (2015).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells. Science 269, 1086–1088 (1995).

  21. 21.

    et al. A unifying model for the operation of light-emitting electrochemical cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society 132, 13776–13781 (2010).

  22. 22.

    Polymers with ionic conductivity. Advanced Materials 2, 278–286 (1990).

  23. 23.

    & Illuminating the electrolyte in light-emitting electrochemical cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 4, 420–432 (2016).

  24. 24.

    et al. High-Performance Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells by Electrolyte Design. Chemistry of Materials (2016).

  25. 25.

    et al. Investigation of polymer electrolytes based on agar and ionic liquids. eXPRESS Polymer Letters 6, 1007 (2012).

  26. 26.

    et al. Novel polymer electrolytes based on gelatin and ionic liquids. Optical Materials 35, 187–195 (2012).

  27. 27.

    et al. Solid polymer electrolytes based on chitosan and europium triflate. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 432, 307–312 (2016).

  28. 28.

    & Polyesters and polyester carbonates for controlled drug delivery. Polimery 58, 858–863 (2013).

  29. 29.

    , & Polycaprolactone degradation by mixed and pure cultures of bacteria and a yeast. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 28, 335–342 (1983).

  30. 30.

    et al. Fungal degradation of polycaprolactones. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 28, 327–334 (1983).

  31. 31.

    , , , & Electrical properties of biodegradable poly (ɛ-caprolactone): lithium thiocyanate complexed polymer electrolyte films. Materials Science and Engineering: B 195, 74–83 (2015).

  32. 32.

    , , & Identifying and alleviating electrochemical side-reactions in light-emitting electrochemical cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society 130, 4562–4568 (2008).

  33. 33.

    , & On the desired properties of a conjugated polymer-electrolyte blend in a light-emitting electrochemical cell. Organic electronics 9, 699–710 (2008).

  34. 34.

    , & Yellow-green light-emitting electrochemical cells with long lifetime and high efficiency. Applied Physics Letters 96, 053303 (2010).

  35. 35.

    , , & Shedding Light on the Operation of Polymer Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells Using Impedance Spectroscopy. Advanced Functional Materials 22, 1511–1517 (2012).

  36. 36.

    Simple method to determine electronic and ionic components of the conductivity in mixed conductors a review. Ionics 8, 300–313 (2002).

  37. 37.

    Bringing light to solid-state electrolytes: The polymer light-emitting electrochemical cell. Electrochimica acta 50, 3878–3885 (2005).

  38. 38.

    et al. The role of the polymer solid electrolyte molecular weight in light-emitting electrochemical cells. Organic Electronics 14, 2223–2227 (2013).

  39. 39.

    et al. The Influence of the Phase Morphology on the Optoelectronic Properties of Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells. Advanced Functional Materials 14, 441–450 (2004).

Download references


The authors are thankful to J. Freudenberg (OCI, Heidelberg University) for a structure analysis of the electrolyte. The authors acknowledge support of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through grant FKZ: 03X5526.

Author information


  1. Light Technology Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Engesserstr. 13, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany

    • Nils Jürgensen
    • , Johannes Zimmermann
    • , Anthony John Morfa
    •  & Gerardo Hernandez-Sosa
  2. InnovationLab, Speyererstr. 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany

    • Nils Jürgensen
    • , Johannes Zimmermann
    • , Anthony John Morfa
    •  & Gerardo Hernandez-Sosa


  1. Search for Nils Jürgensen in:

  2. Search for Johannes Zimmermann in:

  3. Search for Anthony John Morfa in:

  4. Search for Gerardo Hernandez-Sosa in:


N.J., J.Z. and A.J.M. performed the experiments and analysed the data. N.J., A.J.M. and G.H.S. developed the concept, designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerardo Hernandez-Sosa.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history





Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.