Article | Open | Published:

An Aldol Reaction-Based Iridium(III) Chemosensor for the Visualization of Proline in Living Cells

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 36509 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

A long-lived aldol reaction-based iridium(III) chemosensor [Ir(ppy)2(5-CHOphen)]PF6 (1, where ppy = 2-phenylpyridine and 5-CHOphen = 1,10-phenanthroline-5-carbaldehyde) for proline detection has been synthesized. The iridium(III) complex 1, incorporating an aldehyde group in N^N donor ligand, can take part in aldol reaction with acetone mediated by proline. The transformation of the sp2-hybridized carbonyl group into a sp3-hybridized alcohol group influences the metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) state of the iridium(III) complex, resulting in a change in luminescence in response to proline. The interaction of the iridium(III) complex 1 with proline was investigated by 1H NMR, HRMS and emission titration experiments. Upon the addition of proline to a solution of iridium(III) complex 1, a maximum 8-fold luminescence enhancement was observed. The luminescence signal of iridium(III) complex 1 could be recognized in strongly fluorescent media using time-resolved emission spectroscopy (TRES). The detection of proline in living cells was also demonstrated.

Introduction

Amino acids are core building blocks of living systems, and the detection of amino acids has attracted great interest in fields including chemistry, biochemistry and medicine1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. Proline (Pro) is frequently found in β-turn structures of folded protein chains9. An excess level of Pro in blood is termed hyperprolinemia (HP-II), which can lead to seizures or intellectual disability10,11,12,13. Therefore, the development of highly sensitive and selective Pro detection methods is of great significance.

However, studies regarding luminescent probes for Pro have remain scarce14,15, which could be due to the weak nucleophilicity and coordination of secondary amino group of Pro compared to primary amino group of other amino acids. Pro has been well documented to catalyze aldol reaction16,17,18, which proceeds via an enamine intermediate19. Pioneering work by Tanaka, Barbas and co-workers has shown that fluorogenic aldehydes can be used for monitoring aldol reactions via fluorescence spectroscopy20,21, while Kim’s group has developed a coumarin-based aldehyde as an aldol reactant for the selective detection of Pro15.

Compared to organic probes22,23, employing phosphorescent transition metal complexes as chemosensors has several advantages, such as high quantum yields, significant Stokes shifts and long lifetimes which allow them to be potentially used in autofluorescent biological matrices24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36. However, to our knowledge, no previous studies have exploited the detection of Pro in living cells base on the long-lifetime luminescence property of iridium(III) complexes37,38. Herein, we employed an iridium(III) complex 1, incorporating an aldehyde group in phenanthroline N^N ligand and two phenylpyridine C^N ligands, as a Pro chemosensor. We anticipated that the metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) state of the iridium(III) complex would be influenced by the transformation of sp2-hybridized carbonyl group into sp3-hybridized alcohol group by Pro-mediated aldol reaction, thereby allowing the complex to work as a luminescent chemosensor for Pro detection (Fig. 1).

Figure 1: Mechanism of Pro detection by complex 1.
Figure 1

Results

Photophysical properties of 1

Complex 1 could be conveniently prepared from organometallated dimer [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 and 1,10-phenanthroline-5-carbaldehyde (phenald) (Scheme S1, ESI). With the complex 1 in hand, we next investigated the photophysical properties of complex 1. Complex 1 displays a 3.75 μs lifetime (Table S1, ESI), which is on the same order as phosphorescent iridium(III) complexes, while organic chemosensors generally exhibit lifetimes in nanosecond range. The long-lived luminescence property of transition metal complexes enables them to be detected in highly autofluorescent samples using time-resolved luminescence spectroscopy (TRES), whereby offers them a definite advantage as chemosensors. Moreover, 1 exhibits a maximum emission wavelength at 580 nm upon excitation at 350 nm, with a Stokes shift of approximately 230 nm (Figure S1, ESI), which is much higher than those generally exhibit by organic probes.

Signal response of 1 to Pro

First, we investigated the emission response of 1 towards Pro. In the absence of Pro, the luminescence intensity of 1 was weak in a 4:1 mixture of DMSO and acetone. However, upon addition of Pro, a significant luminescence enhancement of 1 was recorded. Time-course experiments revealed that the luminescence of 1 reached steady-state within 40 min upon addition of Pro (80 μM) at 25 °C (Figure S3, ESI). We next examined the luminescence response of 1 in systems containing different volume ratios of DMSO and acetone. The results indicated that our probe performs best in DMSO/acetone (4:1, v/v), with lower luminescence enhancements being observed when the percentage of acetone solution increases (Figure S4, ESI). In emission titration experiments, the luminescence of 1 (10 μM) enhanced with increasing concentration of Pro and was saturated at ten molar equivalents of Pro, with about an 8-fold enhancement (Fig. 2a). Linear relationship (R2 = 0.998) was established with a linear range of 0.4 to 2 molar equivalents of Pro (Fig. 2b), while the limit of detection at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 was calculated to be 0.75 μM, which is sufficient for detecting Pro in blood that typically contains micromolar levels of Pro39. Moreover, the presence of Pro could be observed by naked eyes upon UV illumination using complex 1 (Fig. 3).

Figure 2: Luminescence emission response of 1 towards Pro.
Figure 2

(a) Luminescence spectra of 1 (10 μM) with increasing concentration of Pro (0‒10 molar equivalents) in DMSO/acetone (4:1, v/v). (b) Relationship between luminescence intensity and Pro concentration.

Figure 3: Photographs of 1 (10 μM) with (Left) and without (Right) Pro (100 μM) under UV illumination.
Figure 3

Mechanism validation

To verify the mechanism of the assay, the chemical transformation of 1 into aldol product was monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Fig. 4). The aldehyde (Ha at 10.76 ppm) proton signal of 1 was eliminated upon the addition of DL-Pro to 1 in DMSO-d6/acetone-d6 (4:1, v/v); while a new triplet peak (Hb at 5.33 ppm) appeared together with upfield-shifted aromatic protons. These changes are consistent with the formation of the putative aldol product (2). Moreover, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analysis of the product mixture (with non-deuterated acetone) indicated the formation of product 2 at m/z = 767.2455, while the expected signal for complex 1 at m/z = 709.2742 was diminished (Figure S5, ESI).

Figure 4: Partial 1H NMR spectra of 1 (20 mM) upon the addition of DL-proline (1 molar equivalent) in DMSO-d6/Acetone-d6 (4:1, v/v).
Figure 4

(a) 1. (b) 1 + Pro after 4 h.

Selectivity of complex 1 for Pro

As selectivity is a significant parameter for probe, we evaluated the selectivity of 1 by introducing 20 molar equivalents of Pro or other common amino acids into a solution of 1 (10 μM) (Fig. 5). To our observation, the luminescence response of 1 towards Pro was significantly stronger than that of other amino acids. In order to demonstrate the selectivity of the chemosensor, the tolerance ratio (amount of the interferent that provides 5% of the signal of the analyte) was determined to be 1.03% for lysine, which is the interferent with the strongest luminescence response among other amino acids. This is presumably due to the weaker ability of the primary amines to catalyze aldol reaction versus the secondary amine group of Pro. We also performed a comparative experiment to investigate the response of 1 towards the enantiomers of Pro, and a comparable result was obtained for L, D-Pro and DL-Pro (Figure S6, ESI).

Figure 5: Luminescence response of 1 (10 μM) with 20 molar equivalents of Pro or other amino acids in DMSO/Acetone (4:1, v/v).
Figure 5

Time-resolved emission spectra (TRES) of 1

To demonstrate that the capability of 1 could be identified in highly fluorescent samples based on its long-lifetime luminescence property via TRES, coumarin 1 (Cm1) was introduced into the system to simulate the autofluorescence environment of biological samples. Cm1 displayed a strong peak at 460 nm region with a tail extended to 600 nm. Consequently, the peak of 1 was significantly perturbed by the emission of Cm1, which would result in an inaccurate determination of Pro concentration (Fig. 6a). To our observation, a distinct peak of 1 was distinguished via TRES when the delay time was defined as post-completion time of Cm1 fluorescence decay. In TRES measurement, no emission peak corresponded to Cm1 was observed, and the spectrum only exhibited the emission peak of 1 (Fig. 6b). These results indicate that the long lifetime luminescence of 1 could potentially be visualized in a strongly autofluorescent biological sample using TRES.

Figure 6: TRES of 1 in the presence of Cm1.
Figure 6

(a) t < decay. (b) t > decay.

Application of Pro detection assay in living cells

Considering that living cells are in an aqueous environment, we have also investigated the luminescence response to DMSO-acetone (4:1, v/v) mixed with various percentages of PBS buffer (0–50%). The assay exhibited a gradual reduction in luminescence intensity with increasing proportion of PBS buffer (Figure S7, ESI). Furthermore, the influence of pH value on the assay in DMSO/acetone (4:1, v/v) with 5% PBS was investigated (Figure S8, ESI). The result shows no significant effect of pH on the detection platform in the pH range of 5‒9. Finally, as the ionic strength in the medium increases, the luminescent intensity decreases only slightly (Figure S9, ESI).

We next investigated the ability of 1 to visualize Pro in A2780 cells. In the vehicle control experiments, cells were pre-incubated with acetone (10 mM) for 2 h, and no luminescence was observed in the fluorescence images (Fig. 7a). When cells were incubated with only 1 (10 μM) for 2 h, a relatively faint yellow luminescence was observed (Fig. 7b). Once 1 (10 μM) and acetone (10 mM) were present in the culture medium, an obvious yellow luminescence was observed in the cells after 1 h at 37 °C (Fig. 7c). This could possibly be attributed to the catalysis of the aldol reaction by low levels of proline or other secondary amines in the cells. However, after further incubation of cells with Pro (100 μM), the luminescence intensity was significantly increased (Fig. 7d). These results suggest that complex 1 could be taken up into A2780 cells and detect intracellular Pro efficiently.

Figure 7: Fluorescence images of A2780 cells.
Figure 7

(a) Vehicle control in acetone (10 mM). (b) Cells were incubated with 1 (10 μM) for 2 h. (c,d) Cells were pre-incubated with 1 (10 μM) for 1 h, following by the treatment with (c) acetone (10 mM) or (d) acetone (10 mM) + Pro (100 μM) for 1 h at 37 °C. The samples were excited at 405 nm with a 63× objective lens.

Disscusion

In this paper, we have designed and synthesized a successful iridium(III) chemosensor 1 and employed it as a switch-on probe for Pro visualization. 1 contains an aldehyde group in N^N donor ligand, as well as two ppy C^N ligands, which can take part in aldol reaction with acetone mediated by Pro. In the presence of Pro, 1 produced a maximum 8-fold luminescence enhancement at 580 nm. The linear detection range of 1 for Pro was 2‒100 μM and the limit of detection was 0.75 μM. To our knowledge, this is the first iridium(III) switch-on chemosensor for the detection of Pro in living cells. Compared with organic probes, 1 shows a large Stokes shift and a long-lived luminescence allowing it to be distinguished from autofluorescent media via TRES. We anticipate that complex 1 could provide a scaffold for the detection of Pro in biological samples.

Methods

Synthesis of 1

A solution of 1,10-phenanthroline-5-carbaldehyde (25.0 mg, 0.12 mmol) and the dichloro-bridged [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 (60 mg, 0.056 mmol) in dichloromethane (4 mL) and methanol (4 mL) was stirred at 65 °C overnight40,41,42. After the reaction completed, an excess of solid NH4PF6 was added and stirred for another 0.5 h at room temperature. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (eluent, methanol/dichloromethane, 1/20, v/v) to yield 1 as an orange powder.

Proline detection

1 mM of complex 1 stock solution was prepared in DMSO. The complex was then added into DMSO/acetone (4:1, v/v) to a final concentration of 10 μM. Different concentrations of Pro were then added to DMSO/acetone containing complex 1 (10 μM) in a cuvette. Luminescence emission spectra were recorded on a PTI QM-4 spectrofluorometer (Photo Technology International, Birmingham, NJ) at 25 °C, with the slits for both excitation and emission set at 2.5 nm (slit width: 1.5 nm; detector voltage: 10 V; delay time: 0.01 ms; gate time: 0.01 ms; excitation: 350 nm; emission: 580 nm; stabilization time: 30 min). UV-Vis absorption spectra were recorded on a Cary UV-300 spectrophotometer (double beam).

Live cell imaging assay

A2780 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 106 cells per mL in 35 × 10 mm coverglass-bottom confocal dishes. For vehicle control experiments, acetone (10 mM) solution was pre-incubated with cells for 2 h. For imaging assay, the cells were pre-incubated with 1 (10 μM) for 1 h at 37 °C, followed by washing with PBS buffer three times and further treatment with acetone (10 mM) or with acetone (10 mM) and Pro (100 μM) for 1 h at 37 °C. Fluorescence images of the cells were obtained from Leica TCSSP8 confocal microscope with excitation at 405 mm using a 63× objective lens.

Photophysical measurement

Emission spectra and lifetime measurements for complexes were performed on a PTI TimeMaster C720 Spectrometer (Nitrogen laser: pulse output 337 nm). Error limits were estimated: λ (±1 nm); τ (±10%); φ (±10%). All solvents used for the lifetime measurements were degassed using three cycles of freeze-vac-thaw.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Liu, J.-B. et al. An Aldol Reaction-Based Iridium(III) Chemosensor for the Visualization of Proline in Living Cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 36509; doi: 10.1038/srep36509 (2016).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Luminescent chemodosimeters for bioimaging. Chem. Rev. 113, 192–270 (2012).

  2. 2.

    et al. Highly selective detection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms using a quartz crystal microbalance biosensor based on the toehold-mediated strand displacement reaction. Anal. Chem. 84, 7008–7014 (2012).

  3. 3.

    et al. Thiol-addition reactions and their applications in thiol recognition. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 6032–6059 (2013).

  4. 4.

    , , , & 7-((5-Nitrothiophen-2-yl) methoxy)−3H-phenoxazin-3-one as a spectroscopic off-on probe for highly sensitive and selective detection of nitroreductase. Chem. Commun. 49, 5859–5861 (2013).

  5. 5.

    et al. Assembly of DNA-functionalized gold nanoparticles on electrospun nanofibers as a fluorescent sensor for nucleic acids. Chem. Commun. 49, 5568–5570 (2013).

  6. 6.

    et al. A reusable quartz crystal microbalance biosensor for highly specific detection of single-base DNA mutation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 48, 276–280 (2013).

  7. 7.

    , , & Fluorescent/luminescent detection of natural amino acids by organometallic systems. Coord. Chem. Rev. 303, 139–184 (2015).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Probing disease-related proteins with fluorogenic composite materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 4239–4248 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Fatty acid metabolism. Biochemistry 3, 469–493 (1995).

  10. 10.

    et al. Type II hyperprolinaemia in a pedigree of Irish travellers (nomads). Arch. Dis. Child. 64, 1699–1707 (1989).

  11. 11.

    , , & Chronic hyperprolinemia provokes a memory deficit in the Morris water maze task. Metab. Brain Dis. 20, 73–80 (2005).

  12. 12.

    et al. Effects of chronic proline administration on lipid contents of rat brain. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 26, 567–573 (2008).

  13. 13.

    , , & Inborn errors of proline metabolism. Nutr. 138, 2016S–2020S (2008).

  14. 14.

    & A chemosensor array for the colorimetric identification of 20 natural amino acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 3700–3701 (2005).

  15. 15.

    & Highly selective and sensitive fluorescence turn-on probe for proline. Tetrahedron Lett . 51, 4670–4672 (2010).

  16. 16.

    , & Proline-catalyzed direct asymmetric aldol reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 2395–2396 (2000).

  17. 17.

    , , & Amino acid catalyzed direct asymmetric aldol reactions: a bioorganic approach to catalytic asymmetric carbon-carbon bond-forming reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 5260–5267 (2001).

  18. 18.

    , & Iminium catalysis. Chem. Rev. 107, 5416–5470 (2007).

  19. 19.

    , , & Clarification of the role of water in proline-mediated aldol reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 15100–15101 (2007).

  20. 20.

    , & Design and use of fluorogenic aldehydes for monitoring the progress of aldehyde transformations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 3692–3693 (2004).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Fluorogenic probes for aldol reactions: tuning of fluorescence using π-conjugation systems. Tetrahedron Lett . 55, 74–78 (2014).

  22. 22.

    et al. Discovery of a sensitive Cu(II)-cyanide “off-on” sensor based on new C-glycosyl triazolyl bis-amino acid scaffold. Org. Biomol. Chem. 10, 555–560 (2012).

  23. 23.

    , , & Design strategies for water-soluble small molecular chromogenic and fluorogenic probes. Chem. Rev. 114, 590–659 (2013).

  24. 24.

    & Applications of luminescent transition platinum group metal complexes to sensor technology and molecular probes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 211, 317–351 (2001).

  25. 25.

    & Luminescence platinum(II) terpyridyl complexes‒from fundamental studies to sensory functions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 251, 2477–2488 (2007).

  26. 26.

    , & A tunable ratiometric pH sensor based on carbon nanodots and its application to quantitatively measuring the intracellular pH of whole cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 6432–6435 (2012).

  27. 27.

    , , & Visual specific luminescent probing of hybrid G-quadruplex DNA by a ruthenium polypyridyl complex. Chem. Commun. 48, 10781–10783 (2012).

  28. 28.

    , , , & Thiol-specific phosphorescent imaging in living cells with an azobis (2, 2’-bipyridine)-bridged dinuclear iridium(III) complex. Chem. Commun. 49, 2040–2042 (2013).

  29. 29.

    , & Group 9 organometallic compounds for therapeutic and bioanalytical applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 3614–3631 (2014).

  30. 30.

    et al. Detection of nicking endonuclease activity using a G-quadruplex-selective luminescent switch-on probe. Chem. Sci. 5, 4561–4568 (2014).

  31. 31.

    et al. One-step click engineering considerably ameliorates the practicality of an unqualified rhodamine probe. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014. 6, 19600–19605 (2014).

  32. 32.

    et al. Luminescence switch-on detection of protein tyrosine kinase-7 using a G-quadruplex-selective probe. Chem. Sci. 6, 4284–4290 (2015).

  33. 33.

    et al. A long lifetime switch-on iridium(III) chemosensor for the visualization of cysteine in live zebrafish. Chem. Commun. 52, 4450–4453 (2016).

  34. 34.

    et al. Iridium(III) anthraquinone complexes as two‐photon phosphorescence probes for mitochondria imaging and tracking under hypoxia. Chem. Eur. J. 22, 8955–8965 (2016).

  35. 35.

    et al. An Ir (III) complex chemosensor for the detection of thiols. Sci. Tech. Adv. Mater . 17, 109–114 (2016).

  36. 36.

    et al. A long lifetime luminescent iridium (III) complex chemosensor for the selective switch-on detection of Al3+ ions. Chem. Commun . 52, 3611–3614 (2016).

  37. 37.

    & Sensing cell-secreted molecules. Bioanal. Rev . 4, 87–95 (2012).

  38. 38.

    , , & Biosensors for cell analysis. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 17, 165–190 (2015).

  39. 39.

    , & Whole-blood and plasma amino acid analysis: gas–liquid and cation-exchange chromatography compared. Clin. Chem. 26, 271–276 (1980).

  40. 40.

    et al. A label-free G-quadruplex-based switch-on fluorescence assay for the selective detection of ATP. Analyst . 137, 1538–1540 (2012).

  41. 41.

    et al. Label-free luminescence switch-on detection of hepatitis C virus NS3 helicase activity using a G-quadruplex-selective probe. Chem. Sci. 6, 2166–2171 (2015).

  42. 42.

    et al. Label-free luminescent switch-on detection of endonuclease IV activity using a G-quadruplex-selective iridium (III) complex. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces . 5, 12249–12253 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Hong Kong Baptist University (FRG2/15–16/002), the Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF/14130522), the Research Grants Council (HKBU/12301115, HKBU/204612 and HKBU/201913), the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche/Research Grants Council Joint Research Scheme (AHKBU201/12; Oligoswitch ANR-12-IS07-0001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21502075, 21575121), the Guangdong Province Natural Science Foundation (2015A030313816), the Hong Kong Baptist University Century Club Sponsorship Scheme 2016, the Interdisciplinary Research Matching Scheme (RC-IRMS/15-16/03), the Science and Technology Development Fund, Macao SAR (098/2014/A2), and the University of Macau (MYRG2015-00137-ICMS-QRCM and MRG044/LCH/2015/ICMS).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, China

    • Jin-Biao Liu
  2. Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China

    • Jin-Biao Liu
    • , Zhen-Zhen Dong
    •  & Dik-Lung Ma
  3. State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China

    • Li-Juan Liu
    • , Guan-Jun Yang
    •  & Chung-Hang Leung

Authors

  1. Search for Jin-Biao Liu in:

  2. Search for Li-Juan Liu in:

  3. Search for Zhen-Zhen Dong in:

  4. Search for Guan-Jun Yang in:

  5. Search for Chung-Hang Leung in:

  6. Search for Dik-Lung Ma in:

Contributions

J.-B.L. carried out all the experiments, performed the data analysis and wrote the manuscript; L.-J.L., Z.-Z.D. and G.-J.Y. assisted in the development of the project; C.-H.L. and D.-L.M. designed the experiments and analyzed the results.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jin-Biao Liu or Dik-Lung Ma.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36509

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.