The medial habenula (MHb) plays an important role in nicotine-related behaviors such as nicotine aversion and withdrawal. The MHb receives GABAergic input from the medial septum/diagonal band of Broca (MS/DB), yet the synaptic mechanism that regulates MHb activity is unclear. GABA (γ -aminobutyric acid) is a major inhibitory neurotransmitter activating both GABAA receptors and GABAB receptors. Depending on intracellular chloride concentration, however, GABAA receptors also function in an excitatory manner. In the absence of various synaptic inputs, we found that MHb neurons displayed spontaneous tonic firing at a rate of about ~4.4 Hz. Optogenetic stimulation of MS/DB inputs to the MHb evoked GABAA receptor-mediated synaptic currents, which produced stimulus-locked neuronal firing. Subsequent delayed yet lasting activation of GABAB receptors attenuated the intrinsic tonic firing. Consequently, septal GABAergic input alone orchestrates both excitatory GABAA and inhibitory GABAB receptors, thereby entraining the firing of MHb neurons.
The MHb plays an important role in nicotine-related behaviors such as nicotine aversion and withdrawal1,2,3. Neurons in the ventral two-thirds of the MHb comprise cholinergic subdivision of the nucleus: These neurons densely express cholineacetyltranferase (ChAT) and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors4,5. Typically, they exhibit spontaneous tonic firings that are not synchronized with other adjacent neurons4. A few factors have been known to affect the tonic firings of MHb neurons. Ex-vivo application of nicotine increases firing frequency via neurokinin-2 signaling6. In addition, HCN channels appeared to be involved in the tonic firing4. More importantly, it was found that changes in MHb neuronal tonic firing is associated with the somatic and affective signs of nicotine withdrawal4. GABA, glutamate and ATP are known to be released from afferents to the MHb. Retrograde labeling revealed that MS/DB is a main GABAergic source and the triangular septum that comprises the posterior septal structure is glutamatergic and purinergic sources of the MHb7,8,9.
In the mammalian brain, GABA is known to inhibit neuronal activity via both GABAA and GABAB receptors. Ionotropic GABAA receptors activation elicits inward Cl− flows, which inhibit neuronal activity by generating hyperpolarizing inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs). GABAB receptors, a member of inhibitory G-protein coupled receptors, stabilize neuronal activity through a couple of different pathways. For instance, GABAB receptors activate Gαio proteins, which in turn inhibit adenylyl cyclase via Gαio or gate ion channels via Gβγ10,11. A growing body of evidence suggests that depending on intracellular Cl− concentration, neurons can be depolarized by GABA-generating inward currents through GABAA receptors. In the dentate gyrus, a well-known neurogenic region, neural stem cells are depolarized by GABAA receptors12,13,14,15. In the developing brain, GABAA receptors are excitatory until 2 postnatal weeks15. Recurrent seizures induce excitatory GABA signal by downregulating K+/2Cl− cotransporter (KCC2)16,17 and upregulating Na+/K+/2Cl− cotransporter 1 (NKCC1)18. In an acute stress mouse model, noradrenergic receptor-mediated KCC2 downregulation removes GABAA receptor-mediated synaptic inhibitory constraint of the parvocellular neuron in the hypothalamus19. Therefore, under the certain circumstances, GABA plays as an excitatory neurotransmitter.
Interestingly, it has been known that lack of KCC2 in MHb neurons results in a high internal chloride concentration20,21. Therefore, GABAergic transmission in the MHb may function in excitatory and inhibitory manners via GABAA receptors and GABAB receptors, respectively. Given that MHb neurons generate spontaneous tonic firing4,20, we asked whether this rhythmic firing can be modulated by MS/DB GABAergic inputs. In the present study, exploiting the optogenetic controls of MS/DB input to the MHb, we showed that GABA released from MS/DB afferents entrains MHb neuronal firing by orchestrating both excitatory GABAA receptors and inhibitory GABAB receptors.
Spontaneous tonic firing in MHb neurons
MHb neurons lack KCC2 expression20,21. Given that KCC2 is critical for extruding Cl− in adult neurons15,22, intracellular Cl− concentration in MHb neurons is likely to be higher. Therefore, to obtain stable intrinsic firing frequency without disturbing the intracellular ionic composition, loose-seal cell-attached recordings were made with aCSF-filled patch pipettes23. Recordings were performed at the ventral region of the MHb as shown in Fig. 1A and stable action currents with average firing frequency of 4.36 ± 1.06 Hz were consistently observed. When we measure any time-course change of the firing rates, the paired Student’s t-test showed no significant difference between the initial value (0–5 min) and late value (15–20 min) (aCSF: 99.99 ± 6.57% compared with baseline, n = 7; Fig. 1B), indicating that stable recordings can be maintained for at least 20 min. The MHb receives GABAergic, glutamatergic and purinergic inputs7,8,9. In addition, the MHb has marked expression of nicotinic receptors2,5. Thus, we first examined whether the synaptic inputs are involved in the tonic firing of MHb neurons. Inhibition of glutamatergic (AMPA receptor antagonist, CNQX 10 μM; NMDA receptor antagonist, D-APV 30 μM), cholinergic (nACh receptor antagonist, mecamylamine 10 μM), purinergic (P2X receptor antagonist, PPADS 50 μM) or GABAergic (GABAA receptor antagonist, picrotoxin 100 μM; GABAB receptor antagonist, CGP52432 10 μM) inputs did not modify the spontaneous tonic firing (Fig. 1). When the firing rates recorded 10–15 minutes after the drug treatments were compared with baseline firing rates (0–5 min), the paired Student’s t-test revealed no significant effect of treatments on percent changes in the firing rates (CNQX and D-APV: 98.88 ± 1.70, n = 6; mecamylamine: 107.60 ± 3.54, n = 5 ; PPADS: 107.6 ± 2.54, n = 6; picrotoxin: 100.70 ± 6.54%, n = 4; CGP52432: 107 ± 3.69, n = 5). The results demonstrate that spontaneous tonic firing is independent of these synaptic inputs.
Now, we speculated that activation of GABAA receptors elicits excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in MHb neurons due to the lack of KCC2 proteins thereby enhances MHb neuronal activity. As expected, muscimol (10 μM), a GABAA receptor agonist, showed significant effect on firing frequency (F1, 4 = 65.75, P = 0.0013, one-way repeated measure ANOVA). As shown in Fig. 2A, tonic firing was briefly increased 185.3 ± 19.8% in the early stage of muscimol application (P < 0.05 compared with baseline firing frequency, Bonferroni’s post-hoc test) and quickly became quiescent (P < 0.001 compared with baseline firing frequency, Bonferroni’s post hoc test). This might be due to the sodium channel inactivation as a result of prolonged membrane depolarization caused by lasting excitatory GABA-mediated currents.
Meanwhile, GABAB receptor is G-protein coupled receptor that associates with pertussis toxin sensitive Gi/o family, that in turn regulates specific ion channels and cAMP cascades10,11. Consequently, activation of GABAB receptors stabilizes neuronal activity. As shown in Fig. 2B, baclofen (10 μM), a GABAB receptor agonist, markedly blocked MHb neuronal firing (9.83 ± 4.32% compared with baseline firing rates, p < 0.0001, n = 5, paired t-test). The result is consistent with the well-known inhibitory effect of GABAB receptors on neuronal excitability. Taken together, while GABA may not be involved in basal tonic firing of MHb neurons (Fig. 1), activation of GABA transmission would actively modify neuronal firing. Therefore, we next tested the possibility that GABAergic inputs to the MHb efficiently regulate neuronal tonic firing in the MHb.
The MS/DB GABAergic input to the MHb
Previous histological study using retrograde tracers show that GABAergic neurons in MS/DB project to the MHb7. However, functional GABAergic connections between these two regions have not been examined. Using optogenetic approaches, we tried to elucidate the functional properties of the synapses connecting between the MS/DB and the MHb. We delivered AAV expressing Chronos-GFP [Syn:: Chronos-GFP] into the MS/DB (Fig. 3A). Four to six weeks post infection, marked GFP signals were observed in the injection site (Fig. 3B). In addition, significant GFP signals were also apparent in the ventral MHb (Fig. 3C). As expected, the GFP-positive axon collaterals from the MS/DB showed the expression of vGAT1, a GABAergic presynaptic marker (Fig. 3D).
We next examined functional synaptic connectivity of the MS/DB GABAergic input to the MHb. Whole-cell recordings were obtained from MHb neurons and synaptic neurotransmitter release, putatively GABA, was triggered by illuminating Chronos with a blue LED (470 nm, 5-ms duration). Light stimulation produced inward current at −70 mV (Fig. 4). As expected, picrotoxin (100 μM) dramatically abolished the light-evoked currents (8.97 ± 3.54% compared with baseline currents, P < 0.0001, paired Student’s t-test, n = 4). These data indicate that GABA released from MS/DB inputs induces GABAA receptor-mediated currents in the MHb. However, the light-evoked currents were unchanged with AMPA receptor antagonist (CNQX 10 μM: 114.0 ± 21.39% compared with baseline currents, P = 0.55, paired Student’s t-test, n = 5). In addition, non-specific nAChR blocker did not modify the light-evoked currents (mecamylamine 10 μM: 108.2 ± 13.43% compared with baseline, P = 0.57, paired Student’s t-test, n = 5). Interestingly, P2X receptor antagonist, PPADS (50 μM), slightly but significantly decreased the currents (77.76 ± 3.34% compared with baseline, P = 0.0038, paired Student’s t-test, n = 5). At present, it remains to be examined how purinergic transmission exerts its effect on GABAergic synaptic transmission.
Next we measured the reversal potential of the GABAA receptor-mediated currents (EGABA) elicited by light stimulation. To preserve intracellular Cl− concentration, gramicidin perforated patch recordings were performed. Figure 4E shows representative current traces evoked by a brief light stimulation (470 nm, 10-ms duration) at different membrane potentials: The light-evoked Cl− currents were reversed in polarity between −40 mV and −30 mV. We then constructed current-voltage (I-V) plots for the Cl− currents and used linear regression analysis to measure EGABA (Fig. 4F). EGABA was estimated to be −33.27 ± 1.43 mV (n = 4), which was more depolarized than resting membrane potential of MHb neurons (−44.50 ± 1.29 mV, n = 12). Therefore, activation of GABAA receptors is expected to produce EPSCs in MHb neurons.
Although it has been reported that GABAA receptor signaling is absent in the MHb21, our data clearly verify the functional GABAA receptor-mediated synapses in the MHb. As we assessed the expression of mRNA encoding GABAA receptor subtypes in the MHb, multiple subtypes appeared to be expressed in the MHb (Supplementary information Fig. S1).
Entrainment of MHb neuronal firing via both GABAA and GABAB receptors
Our immunohistochemical and optogenetic approaches demonstrate that the MS/DB exerts GABAergic transmission on MHb neurons. Since agonists for GABAA receptors increased MHb neuronal firing (Fig. 2A) and EGABA was more depolarized than resting membrane potential of MHb neurons, we tested whether the MS/DB GABAergic inputs can generate firing in MHb neurons. To this end, we delivered light stimulus (470 nm, 5 ms) to activate Chronos expressed in MS/DB afferents upon loose-patch cell-attached recordings. Raster plot, corresponding normalized firing frequency and z-score profiles demonstrated that a single light stimulus reliably induced neuronal firing with the kinetics not different from those of the spontaneous tonic firing (Fig. 5A inset, Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.95, P < 0.0001). A light stimulus frequently triggered a brief burst (Fig. 5A), which might be attributed to the light-evoked strong depolarization. Given the high input resistance of MHb neurons (1.29 ± 0.11 GΩ, n = 12), we expected that EPSPs generated by light-activated GABAA currents are sufficient to trigger action potentials in MHb neurons. Indeed, the light-induced firing was completely abolished by picrotoxin (Fig. 5B). Meanwhile, a light stimulus not only induced immediate firing, but also generated delayed but prolonged quiet periods when spontaneous tonic firing was suppressed (as judged by negative values of z-score, Fig. 5A). Intriguingly, the suppression of tonic firing was still maintained in the presence of pricrotoxin. This might be due to the delayed but lasting activation of GABAB receptors. Indeed, CGP52432 rendered the quiet period less prominent without affecting light-induced firing (Fig. 5C). Consequently, GABAA and GABAB receptors cooperatively participate in resetting the intrinsic tonic firing of MHb neurons.
We next sought to establish whether various frequency activation of GABAergic input from the MS/DB can affect firing output in MHb neurons. When light with various frequencies (1–10 Hz) were applied, raster plot and corresponding z-score profile showed that MHb neurons reliably followed the stimulation frequency in a stimulus-locked manner, regardless of their original tonic firing frequency (Fig. 6A). To ensure the involvement of both GABAA and GABAB receptors on the firing entrainment, we examined the effects of picrotoxin and CGP52432. As expected, treatment of picrotoxin completely failed light-evoked firing, consequently abolished the firing entrainment (Fig. 6B). Instead, prominent light-induced suppression of intrinsic tonic firing was apparent in the presence of picrotoxin, which might be due to the activation of GABAB receptors alone. In contrast, light stimulations in the presence of CGP52432 induced limited entrainment: light elicited GABAA receptor-dependent firing, with less suppressed intrinsic tonic firings between stimulations (Fig. 6C). For this reason, CGP52432 rendered low-frequency entrainment (1 and 2 Hz) far less accurate. In conclusion, GABAA and GABAB receptors activated by GABA released from MS/DB afferents entrain MHb neuronal firing by exerting opposite effects on neuronal activity.
In the present study, we have demonstrated functional GABAergic synaptic connectivity between the MS/DB and the MHb. More importantly, we revealed that the GABAergic transmission alone is sufficient to entrain rhythmic firing in the MHb. We hope that our findings will give insight to understand MHb activity-mediated behaviors.
It has been known that MHb neurons possess spontaneous tonic firing4,20. A recent study revealed that MHb neurons are equipped with hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels that confer them with intrinsic rhythmic firing4. Indeed, the tonic firing is maintained without synaptic input as shown in this study (Fig. 1) as well as the previous observations4,20. This intrinsically generated tonic firing was dramatically modified following the activation of GABAA and GABAB receptors using the agonists, muscimol and baclofen, respectively: GABAA receptor activation by muscimol triggered robust firings in MHb neurons, whereas GABAB receptor activation by baclofen completely abolished the firings (Fig. 2). Previous study also reported GABAA excitation in the MHb from juvenile rats (18- to 25-day old)20. Since GABAA receptors are excitatory until 2 postnatal weeks in the developing brain6, the possibility was raised that the GABAA excitation in the MHb only reflects the immature property of the developing brain. However, we consistently observed GABAA excitation in the MHb obtained from adult mice (10–16 weeks), indicating that excitatory GABAergic activity is not attributed to immaturity of MHb neurons.
Both input and output pathways of the MHb have been well established6,7,8,24,25. Nevertheless, many functional studies related with the MHb have been focused on the output pathway26,27,28 or the habenular nucleus itself1,2,4,29,30. Indeed, only one study, to our knowledge, has been attempted to explain functional relevance of posterial septal afferents to the MHb31. Here we focused on MS/DB afferents to the MHb to establish functional input pathway of the MHb. It has been reported that the MHb received GABAergic projection from MS/DB using a retrograde tracer7. Consistently, we observed that Chronos-GFP-expressing MS/DB afferents express vGAT1, a GABAergic presynaptic marker. Furthermore, light stimulation of Chronos-GFP-expressing MS/DB afferents evoked picrotoxin-sensitive GABAA currents, indicating functional synaptic connectivity of the GABAergic MS/DB afferents to the MHb. On the contrary, a previous study demonstrates that β 2/3 subtypes of GABAA receptors are not expressed in the MHb and GABA application evoked no measurable currents in the MHb21. Our study, however, identified GABAA receptor subtypes differentially expressed in the MHb using RT-PCR (Supplementary Fig. S1). More importantly, optogenetic stimulation evoked picrotoxin-sensitive GABAA currents in MHb neurons (Fig. 4).
Meanwhile, it has been reported that GABAB receptors are expressed substantially in MHb20 (Allen institute, experiment number 68862120, 71247614). Consistent with these observations, we found that baclofen completely abolished spontaneous tonic firing (Fig. 2B). Considering that GABAA and GABAB receptors exert the opposite effects on the activity of MHb neurons, we supposed that GABAergic MS/DB input alone entrains thereby synchronize MHb neuronal firings. We found that GABA optogenetically released from MS/DB afferents immediately elicited firing via fast activation of GABAA receptors and subsequently suppressed intrinsic tonic firings via delayed but lasting activation of GABAB receptors (Fig. 5). As a result, GABAergic MS/DB input entrained firing of MHb neurons (Fig. 6).
The MS/DB plays a key role in generating theta oscillations in the hippocampus32. And most MS/DB GABAergic neuronal firing is phase locked to hippocampal theta in vivo33. Intriguingly, hippocampal input to the MS/DB preferentially generates rhythmic firing of GABAergic neurons in the MS/DB34. In brain slices ex vivo, spontaneous tonic firings of MHb neurons are not synchronized with other adjacent neurons4. Taking into account the facts that MS/DB GABAergic neuronal firing is tuned to theta frequency in vivo33 and that GABAergic MS/DB input entrains neuronal firing in the MHb (Fig. 6), MS/DB input may synchronize MHb neuronal firing locked to theta rhythm in vivo. MHb neurons mainly project to the interpeduncular nucleus (IPN)25,35,36. Supposedly, unsynchronized intrinsic tonic firing in MHb neurons per se may produce subthreshold postsynaptic activity in IPN neurons. Now the synchronized MHb neuronal firing by MS/DB input may cause postsynaptic spatial summation, allowing IPN neurons to generate faithful suprathreshold activity.
Several studies have revealed that the MHb-IPN pathway play roles in nicotine-related behaviors. Activation of IPN GABAergic neurons that receive direct projection from the MHb triggers physical nicotine withdrawal symptoms26. Mice lacking nAChR α5 subunit exhibit decreased MHb input to IPN, which results in attenuated nicotine aversion1. Conversely, elevated expression of the nAChR β4 subunit increases nicotine aversion in mice by enhancing activity of the MHb to the IPN2. Experiments in animal models have demonstrated directly that the MHb-IPN pathway participates in nicotine withdrawal37. Therefore, it is plausible that MS/DB-MHb pathway also plays a role in nicotine-related behaviors because synchronized MHb neuronal firing would reliably activate IPN neurons. Although behavioral relevance still remains to be investigated, to our best knowledge, we have first demonstrated the MS/DB GABAergic entrainment of MHb neuronal firing.
Material and Method
Animal maintenance and treatment were carried out in accordance with the Animal Care and Use Guidelines issued by Kyung Hee University, Korea. All experiments with mice were performed according to the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kyung Hee University (Approved protocol No. KHU(SE)-13-031, KHU(SE)-15-026). Male C57BL/6 mice (6–16 weeks of age, Orient Bio) were used for all experiments. Mice were group-housed on a 12-h:12-h light:dark cycle (light on 07:00) and had free access to food and water. The animals were held in a chamber with 20–24 °C, 30–60% humidity.
All streotaxic injections were performed under xylazine (5 mg/kg), tiletamine (60 mg/kg) and zolazepam (60 mg/kg) anesthesia using streotaxic frame (Stoelting). For virus injections, viral stocks (0.5 μL, AAV/Syn::Chronos-GFP, UNC vector core) were injected in the MS (AP +0.75, ML −0.05, DV −4.30) and DB (AP +0.75 mm, ML +−0.45 mm, DV −5.30 mm) using Picospritzer III (Parker) at a slow rate (50 nL/min). Mice were then allowed to recover for 4–6 weeks until further experiments.
Acute Slice preparation
Mice were deeply anesthetized and performed cardiac perfusion with ice-cold aCSF of the following composition (in mM): 124 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 24 NaHCO3, 5 HEPES, 13 Glucose, 2 MgSO4, 2 CaCl2. After perfusion, the brain was quickly removed, submerged and coronally sectioned on a vibratome (VT1000s, Leica) to 250–300 μm in ice-cold aCSF. Slices transferred quickly to NMDG based recovery solution at 32 °C of the following composition (in mM): 92 NMDG, 2.5 KCl, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 30 NaHCO3, 20 HEPES, 25 glucose, 5 sodium ascorbate, 2 thiourea, 3 sodium pyruvate, 10 MgSO4, 0.5 CaCl2. After 10–12 min recovery periods, slices were transferred to room temperature aCSF chamber (20–22 °C) and left at least for 1 hour for the further recovery.
Electrophysiological recordings were made using an EPC10 amplifier (HEKA elektronik). Patch-clamp pipettes were pulled (PP-83; Narishige) from borosilicate glass (Warner Instruments) and had a tip resistance of 3–6 MΩ when filled with internal solution. After recovery periods, acute slices were then transferred to the recording chamber, were fully submerged at a flow rate of 1.4–1.6 mL/min and maintained at 30 ± 1 °C in aCSF. Cells were visualized using epifluorescence and infrared differential interference contrast (IR-DIC) video microscopy with a 40X magnification water-immersion objective (BX51WI, Olympus). Tonic firings were measured in a loose cell-attached mode (8–25 MΩ) to prevent internal dialysis and aCSF was used for pipet solution. Chronos was stimulated by brief 470 nm light (5-ms duration) through the optic fiber (NA = 0.35) using light-emitting diode (LED; Doric lens, LEDC2) powered by an LED driver (Thorlabs, LEDD1B) under control of pulse generator (AMPI, Master-8). After the recordings, some slices were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS to perform immunohistochemistry. Synaptic currents evoked by light were recorded at −70 mV in a whole-cell mode using pipet solution containing (in mM): 100 K-Gluconate, 20 KCl, 10 HEPES, 0.2 EGTA, 10 Na2-phosphocreatine, 4 MgATP, 0.3 Na4GTP; pH was adjusted to 7.2–7.3 with KOH. Pipet solution for gramicidin perforated patch recording contained (in mM) 140 KCl, 10 NaCl, 10 HEPES; pH was adjusted to 7.2–7.3 with KOH. Gramicidin (Sigma-Aldrich) was first dissolved in DMSO (10 mg/ml) to prepare a stock solution and then diluted to a final concentration of 10 μg/ml in the pipet solution. The gramicidin-containing solution was prepared and sonicated immediately before use. After EGABA measurements, the integrity of the perforated patch was confirmed by rupturing the underlying sealed membrane and observing an abrupt change in access resistance and a shift in EGABA. Data were sampled at 10 kHz and filtered at 2.9 kHz with Bessel filter of the amplifier. Data were analyzed using Patchmaster (HEKA), Igor 6.0 (Wavemetrincs) or Minianalysis (synaptosoft).
30 μm cryosected brain slices were permeabilized in 0.6% Triton X-100 and blocked in 3% normal donkey serum in PBS for 30 minutes in free floating condition. Rabbit anti-vGat1 antibody (1:500, Synaptic systems) was incubated for overnight in 1% normal donkey serum and 0.1% triton X-100 in PBS at 4 °C. For visualization, slices were incubated with Cy3-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) for 2 hours. Immunostained slices were scanned using a confocal laser microscope (LSM510, Carl Zeiss).
Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN #74104) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. To synthesize first strand cDNA, 1 μg of total RNA was incubated at 70 °C for 5 min with 0.5 μg of oligodT and deionized water (up to 15 μl). The reverse transcription reaction was performed using 200 units of M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in 5X reaction buffer (250 mmol/l Tris-HCl; pH 8.3, 375 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2, 50 mM DTT), 28 units of RNasin inhibitor, and 2.5 mM dNTP mixtures at 42 °C for 90 min. The expression of GABAA receptor subunits was examined by PCR as previously described38,39. Two microliters of the cDNA product were amplified in a mixture containing 5 pmole of GABAA receptor subtype-specific primers, 0.2 mM dNTPs and 1 unit Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) with reaction buffer in a final volume of 25 μl. The PCR amplification was carried out for 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 sec, 52 °C for 30 sec and 72 °C for 1 min. The primers used were: beta-actin sense primer, 5′-TCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCTACGAG-3′; beta-actin anti-sense primer, 5′-GTGGTGAAGCTGTAGCCACGCTC-3′; GABAA receptor subtype α1, α2, α3, α4, α5, α6, β1, β2, β3, γ1, γ2, γ3, δ primers were manufactured as previously described38. GABAA receptor subtype ε, θ, ρ1, ρ2, ρ3 primer sequences were referred to in the previous paper39.
All data are presented as mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or paired Student’s t-test. Mean differences between groups were considered significant when P < 0.05. To quantify firing entrainment, loose seal cell-attached recording was normalized using firing probability and standard z-score transformation (bin size, 10 ms). Firing probability was calculated by following equations; sum of firing in each bins/total number of sweeps. Neuronal firing was normalized to the firing rates during 500 ms (Fig. 5) or 6 s (Fig. 6) just prior to light stimulus train.
How to cite this article: Choi, K. et al. Optogenetic activation of septal GABAergic afferents entrains neuronal firing in the medial habenula. Sci. Rep. 6, 34800; doi: 10.1038/srep34800 (2016).
Fowler, C. D., Lu, Q., Johnson, P. M., Marks, M. J. & Kenny, P. J. Habenular alpha5 nicotinic receptor subunit signalling controls nicotine intake. Nature 471, 597–601 (2011).
Frahm, S. et al. Aversion to nicotine is regulated by the balanced activity of beta4 and alpha5 nicotinic receptor subunits in the medial habenula. Neuron 70, 522–535 (2011).
Lee, H., Kang, M. S., Chung, J. M. & Noh, J. Repeated nicotine exposure in adolescent rats: Reduction of medial habenular activity and augmentation of nicotine preference. Physiology and behavior 138, 345–350 (2015).
Gorlich, A. et al. Reexposure to nicotine during withdrawal increases the pacemaking activity of cholinergic habenular neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 17077–17082 (2013).
Shih, P. Y. et al. Differential expression and function of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in subdivisions of medial habenula. The Journal of neuroscience 34, 9789–9802 (2014).
Dao, D. Q., Perez, E. E., Teng, Y., Dani, J. A. & De Biasi, M. Nicotine enhances excitability of medial habenular neurons via facilitation of neurokinin signaling. The Journal of neuroscience 34, 4273–4284 (2014).
Qin, C. & Luo, M. Neurochemical phenotypes of the afferent and efferent projections of the mouse medial habenula. Neuroscience 161, 827–837 (2009).
Sperlagh, B., Magloczky, Z., Vizi, E. S. & Freund, T. F. The triangular septal nucleus as the major source of ATP release in the rat habenula: a combined neurochemical and morphological study. Neuroscience 86, 1195–1207 (1998).
Antolin-Fontes, B., Ables, J. L., Gorlich, A. & Ibanez-Tallon, I. The habenulo-interpeduncular pathway in nicotine aversion and withdrawal. Neuropharmacology 96, 213–222 (2015).
Gassmann, M. & Bettler, B. Regulation of neuronal GABA(B) receptor functions by subunit composition. Nature reviews Neuroscience 13, 380–394 (2012).
Bettler, B., Kaupmann, K., Mosbacher, J. & Gassmann, M. Molecular structure and physiological functions of GABA(B) receptors. Physiological reviews 84, 835–867 (2004).
Song, J. et al. Neuronal circuitry mechanism regulating adult quiescent neural stem-cell fate decision. Nature 489 (2012).
Rivera, C. et al. The K+/Cl− co-transporter KCC2 renders GABA hyperpolarizing during neuronal maturation. Nature 397 (1999).
Cherubini, E., Gaiarsa, J. L. & Ben-Ari, Y. GABA: an excitatory transmitter in early postnatal life. Trends in neurosciences 14, 515–519 (1991).
Ben-Ari, Y. The GABA excitatory/inhibitory developmental sequence: a personal journey. Neuroscience. 279, 187–219 (2014).
Woo, N. S. et al. Hyperexcitability and epilepsy associated with disruption of the mouse neuronal-specific K-Cl cotransporter gene. Hippocampus 12, 258–268 (2002).
Nardou, R. et al. Neuronal chloride accumulation and excitatory GABA underlie aggravation of neonatal epileptiform activities by phenobarbital. Brain 134, 987–1002 (2011).
Fukuda, A. Diuretic soothes seizures in newborns. Nature medicine 11, 1153–1154 (2005).
Hewitt, S. A., Wamsteeker, J. I., Kurz, E. U. & Bains, J. S. Altered chloride homeostasis removes synaptic inhibitory constraint of the stress axis. Nature neuroscience 12 (2009).
Kim, U. & Chung, L. Y. Dual GABAergic synaptic response of fast excitation and slow inhibition in the medial habenula of rat epithalamus. Journal of neurophysiology 98, 1323–1332 (2007).
Wang, D. G., Gong, N., Luo, B. & Xu, T. L. Absence of GABA type A signaling in adult medial habenular neurons. Neuroscience 141, 133–141 (2006).
Chamma, I., Chevy, Q., Poncer, J. C. & Levi, S. Role of the neuronal K-Cl co-transporter KCC2 in inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmission. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience 6, 5 (2012).
Perkins, K. L. Cell-attached voltage-clamp and current-clamp recording and stimulation techniques in brain slices. Journal of neuroscience methods 154, 1–18 (2006).
Herkenham, M. & Nauta, W. J. Afferent connections of the habenular nuclei in the rat. A horseradish peroxidase study, with a note on the fiber-of-passage problem. The Journal of comparative neurology 173, 123–146 (1977).
Herkenham, M. & Nauta, W. J. Efferent connections of the habenular nuclei in the rat. The Journal of comparative neurology 187, 19–47 (1979).
Zhao-Shea, R., Liu, L., Pang, X., Gardner, P. D. & Tapper, A. R. Activation of GABAergic neurons in the interpeduncular nucleus triggers physical nicotine withdrawal symptoms. Current biology 23, 2327–2335 (2013).
Zhao-Shea, R. et al. Increased CRF signalling in a ventral tegmental area-interpeduncular nucleus-medial habenula circuit induces anxiety during nicotine withdrawal. Nature communications 6, 6770 (2015).
Soria-Gomez, E. et al. Habenular CB1 Receptors Control the Expression of Aversive Memories. Neuron 88, 306–313 (2015).
Kobayashi, Y. et al. Genetic dissection of medial habenula-interpeduncular nucleus pathway function in mice. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience 7, 17 (2013).
Frahm, S. et al. An essential role of acetylcholine-glutamate synergy at habenular synapses in nicotine dependence. eLife 4, e11396 (2015).
Yamaguchi, T., Danjo, T., Pastan, I., Hikida, T. & Nakanishi, S. Distinct roles of segregated transmission of the septo-habenular pathway in anxiety and fear. Neuron 78, 537–544 (2013).
Hangya, B., Borhegyi, Z., Szilagyi, N., Freund, T. F. & Varga, V. GABAergic neurons of the medial septum lead the hippocampal network during theta activity. The Journal of neuroscience 29, 8094–8102 (2009).
Borhegyi, Z., Varga, V., Szilagyi, N., Fabo, D. & Freund, T. F. Phase segregation of medial septal GABAergic neurons during hippocampal theta activity. The Journal of neuroscience 24, 8470–8479 (2004).
Manseau, F., Goutagny, R., Danik, M. & Williams, S. The hippocamposeptal pathway generates rhythmic firing of GABAergic neurons in the medial septum and diagonal bands: an investigation using a complete septohippocampal preparation in vitro. The Journal of neuroscience 28, 4096–4107 (2008).
Ren, J. et al. Habenula “cholinergic” neurons co-release glutamate and acetylcholine and activate postsynaptic neurons via distinct transmission modes. Neuron 69, 445–452 (2011).
Aizawa, H., Amo, R. & Okamoto, H. Phylogeny and ontogeny of the habenular structure. Frontiers in neuroscience 5, 138 (2011).
Salas, R., Sturm, R., Boulter, J. & De Biasi, M. Nicotinic receptors in the habenulo-interpeduncular system are necessary for nicotine withdrawal in mice. The Journal of neuroscience 29, 3014–3018 (2009).
Gangisetty, O. & Reddy, D. S. The optimization of TaqMan real-time RT-PCR assay for transcriptional profiling of GABA-A receptor subunit plasticity. Journal of neuroscience methods 181, 58–66 (2009).
Mendu, S. K., Bhandage, A., Jin, Z. & Birnir, B. Different subtypes of GABA-A receptors are expressed in human, mouse and rat T lymphocytes. PloS one 7, e42959 (2012).
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the NRF funded by the Ministry of Sciences, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2014R1A2A1A11050360, NRF-2012M3A9C6049937, NRF-2012R1A2A2A01015843).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, K., Lee, Y., Lee, C. et al. Optogenetic activation of septal GABAergic afferents entrains neuronal firing in the medial habenula. Sci Rep 6, 34800 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34800
Scientific Reports (2020)
Molecular Psychiatry (2019)
Cell Reports (2018)