Abstract
A novel ignition hohlraum for indirectdrive inertial confinement fusion is proposed, which is named threeaxis cylindrical hohlraum (TACH). TACH is a kind of 6 laser entrance holes (LEHs) hohlraum, which is orthogonally jointed of three cylindrical hohlraums. Laser beams are injected through every entrance hole with the same incident angle of 55°. A viewfactor simulation result shows that the timevarying drive asymmetry of TACH is less than 1.0% in the whole drive pulse period without any supplementary technology. Coupling efficiency of TACH is close to that of 6 LEHs spherical hohlraum with corresponding size. Its plasmafilling time is close to that of typical cylindrical ignition hohlraum. Its laser plasma interaction has as low backscattering as the outer cone of the cylindrical ignition hohlraum. Therefore, TACH combines most advantages of various hohlraums and has little predictable risk, providing an important competitive candidate for ignition hohlraum.
Introduction
In indirectdrive Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF), laser beams are injected into a highZ hohlraum through laser entrance holes (LEHs) and are converted into Xray radiation, then the radiation irradiates a lowZ capsule in the center of the hohlraum to bring the central fuel in the capsule to ignition conditions^{1,2,3,4,5,6}. To achieve the ignition conditions, a convergence ratio of about 30 is necessary in the central hot spot ignition scheme^{1,3}, so the radiation drive asymmetry should be less than 1%^{1}, which is the key point for hohlraum design. Up to now, cylindrical hohlraum with 2 LEHs is the main choice and has been largely studied in the National Ignition Campaign (NIC)^{7}. In order to achieve necessary timevarying symmetry in cylindrical hohlraums, multicone laser beams are used, and the P_{2} and P_{4} asymmetries are controlled by adjusting the power ratio between the inner and outer cones (beam phasing technology)^{1,4}. However, the inner cone beams generate a considerable fraction of backscattering^{7}, and the overlap of multiple cones causes crossedbeam energy transfer^{8,9,10}. In addition, the plasma bubbles generated by outer cone affect the transfer of inner beams. These problems make the beam phasing a very complicated job. In addition, the beam phasing technology strictly depends on simulations, and the plasma of laser plasma interaction (LPI) region is nonlocal thermodynamic equilibrium, so it is difficult to be accurately calculated^{11}. Besides cylindrical hohlraum, other hohlraums with different shapes have been proposed and investigated to improve the radiation environment inside the hohlraums, such as rugby hohlraum^{12,13,14}, 4 or 6 LEHs spherical hohlraum^{15,16,17,18,19,20}. However, rugby hohlraum has the similar problem of beam phasing as cylindrical hohlraum. For 4 LEHs spherical hohlraum, it is difficult to control asymmetry below 1.0% using single cone beams^{16,18}. 6 LEHs spherical hohlraum has the natural superiority in radiation symmetry^{18}, but experimental studies near ignition conditions are difficult and insufficiency on existing facilities.
Results
A novel threeaxis cylindrical hohlraum
Based on plentiful simulation studies of various hohlraums and existing experimental results on cylindrical hohlraum, a novel hohlraum named threeaxis cylindrical hohlraum (TACH) is proposed, which is orthogonally jointed of three cylindrical hohlraums, as shown in Fig. 1. The axes of the three cylindrical hohlraums coincide with the X, Y, Z axis of a rectangular coordinate system respectively. TACH is a kind of 6 LEHs hohlraum. 8 laser quads arranged in one cone are injected through each LEH. The timevarying symmetry, coupling efficiency and plasma filling of TACH are studied in this article.
Timevarying symmetry
Due to the singlecone design for TACH, it is hard to control the timevarying radiation drive asymmetry by beam phasing technology, so it is crucial to study the timevarying symmetry of TACH. The symmetry can be studied by use of a viewfactor model^{21,22,23}. In order to simplify the analysis, the radiation intensity of the laser spots and that of the reemission wall are assumed to be uniformly distributed respectively. F_{S} and F_{W} are used to denote the radiation intensities of the two kinds of regions. T_{r} shown in Fig. 2(a) is chosen as the ignition radiation temperature pulse inside the hohlraum^{4,24}. α_{W} and α_{C} are defined as the albedo of hohlraum wall and that of capsule respectively. A_{W}, A_{S}, A_{C}, and A_{L} are used to denote the areas of the hohlraum wall, laser spots, capsule surface and LEH respectively. Among them, A_{S} is a part of A_{W}. According to the power balance equation^{25},
A simple analytical model is used to calculate the timevarying albedo of the hohlraum wall. During 0 ns~7 ns, the albedo is calculated by the scaling law ^{2} and α_{W} is taken as 0.01 if α_{W} < 0.01. Then it increases linearly after 7 ns and reaches 0.9 at 13 ns^{22,26} as shown in Fig. 2(a). The albedo calculated by the simple model (black) is close to the simulation result from the 1D radiation hydrodynamic code of multigroups (RDMG)^{14} (green), so it is reasonable to be used in our analysis.
With the ablation of laser and xray, the hohlraum walls move inward. Study shows that the inward wall movement is dominated by reradiated xray ablation, not by laser ablation^{2}. Considering the quasiuniform radiation environment inside the hohlraum, it can be assumed that the whole hohlraum walls including the LEH move inward at the same speed. Figure 2(b) is the schematic of the hohlraum wall movement and the LEHs closure. According to the theory of radiation ablation^{3}, the speed (v) of hohlraum wall movement can be assumed to be proportional to the sound speed c_{s} of the highZ ablated plasma. For Au hohlraum wall, the sound speed is ^{1}, where T_{r} is the radiation temperature in eV, ρ is the density of ablated plasma in g/cm^{3}. Ignoring the weak relationship between c_{s} and ρ, it is simplified down to . It is assumed the distance of inward wall motion is 275 μm at 14 ns^{19,22,27}. According to the T_{r} pulse shown in Fig. 2(a), the speed of hohlraum wall can be written as . The displacement s of hohlraum wall can be calculated by integrating the velocity over time as shown in Fig. 2(a).
As shown in Fig. 1(c), the laser quads are injected into the hohlraum with incident angle of θ_{L}, and the profile of laser spot on the LEH plane is set as round with radius of R_{Q}. R_{H}, R_{L} and R_{C} indicate the radius of cylindrical hohlraum, LEH and capsule respectively. Δ indicates the minimum distance between the initial edge of the laser spots and the initial inner wall of adjacent cylindrical hohlraum as is shown in Fig. 2(b). So the length of the cylindrical hohlraum can be written as,
In the calculation model, R_{Q} = 0.6 mm, α_{C} = 0.3^{20,28,29} and R_{C} = 1.18 mm^{4,24} are taken, which are all independent of time, and the initial R_{L} is taken as 1.3 mm. By choosing the appropriate Δ to set the initial positions of laser spots and considering the timevarying albedo and displacement of hohlraum wall, the timevarying radiation asymmetry on capsule can be calculated, where F is the radiation intensity on capsule, and is the average value of flux F on capsule^{18}.
In the calculation, R_{H}/R_{C} is defined as the casetocapsule ratio (CCR). The radiation drive symmetries of the hohlraums with CCRs = 1.9, 2.0, 2.2, 2.4 and 2.6 are investigated with the laser incident angle of 55°. In the early stage α_{W} << 1, and it can be calculated from Eq. (1) that the ratio of radiation intensity of laser spots to that of reemission wall F_{s}/F_{W} >> 1. So the early symmetry is mainly determined by the initial position of the laser spots. In order to avoid the case that the laser beams from one cylindrical hohlraum enter another one, Δ ≥ 0 is taken as shown in Fig. 2(b). Calculations indicate that there is an optimum Δ in order to obtain the best initial symmetry for TACHs with different dimensions. Symmetry variation with Δ near the optimum Δ is illustrated in Fig. 3, and a smaller CCR corresponds to a better initial symmetry and a larger optimum Δ.
By setting the laser spots at the optimized initial position, the timevarying radiation drive symmetries of TACHs are calculated by use of the viewfactor model mentioned above. The timevarying symmetries of TACHs with different CCR are shown in Fig. 4, which indicate that all the hohlraums with CCR from 1.9 to 2.6 have a good timevarying symmetry during the whole period of the laser pulse. The initial asymmetry increases with the CCR of the hohlraums. Nevertheless, even for the hohlraum with the greatest CCR of 2.6, the initial is below 1.2%, and falls rapidly to below 1.0% after 300 ps with the heating of the wall and the rising of the albedo. In the cases of CCR ≤ 2.2, the initial is less than 1.0%, meeting the need of the initial symmetry for ignition. During the period between 1 ns and 11 ns, all the keep below 0.6%, the minimum value is even less than 0.2%. During the main pulse of the radiation (11 ns~14 ns), the asymmetry increases nearly linearly with time, a smaller CCR corresponds to a quicker increase of the asymmetry. At the end of the radiation pulse (t = 14 ns), the smaller asymmetry is achieved for hohlraums with larger CCR, which is just opposite from the early situations, and all of the asymmetry can be controlled below 1.0% at this time. After 1 ns, the asymmetry changes slower for the hohlraum with a larger CCR, especially for the hohlraum with CCR = 2.6 whose keeps below 0.6% and almost independent of time from 1 ns to 14 ns.
In general, a smaller CCR corresponds to a better early symmetry while a larger CCR corresponds to a better final symmetry. Take the implosion of the capsule into consideration, a small initial CCR becomes larger and larger during the laser pulse, which is beneficial to improve the final symmetry of the TACH. So the TACHs with CCR = 2.0~2.2 are selected as the optimum hohlraum.
Similar to the case of 6 LEHs spherical hohlraum^{18}, as shown in the Fig. 5(a), there are two special types of points on the capsule. The normal directions of the first type points are parallel or antiparallel to the direction of X, Y or Z axis, and are facing the corresponding LEHs. One of such six points is marked with A in Fig. 5(a). For another type of points, the normal direction of which has an equal angle with X, Y and Z axis, adds up to 8, and one of such points is marked with B in Fig. 5(a). Calculations indicate that the initial symmetry on the capsule is optimal if the drive flux of A is equal to that of B. Then the relative flux of regions around point A become more and more intense than that of regions around point B due to the movement of the laser spots towards the LEHs with time. At the end of the laser pulse, the radiation flux into the points facing the LEHs are more intense than other points of the capsule.
Using spherical harmonic function Y_{lm}(θ, φ), the drive flux on capsule can be expanded as , where F(P) is the drive flux at point P(θ, φ) on capsule, and a_{lm} is spherical harmonic decomposition. Define C_{l0} = a_{l0}/a_{00} and C_{lm} = 2a_{lm}/a_{00} for m > 0, and the timevarying C_{lm} is shown in Fig. 6. During the whole drive period, C_{20} can be suppressed below 0.01%, which can be neglected. For the modes with l ≥ 6, the maximum value of them is less than 0.2%, and the timevarying values of them can be controlled below 0.1% at most time. After 5 ns, C_{40} and C_{44} dominate the capsule flux asymmetry, both of which increase monotonously from 0.1% to about 0.4%. As shown in Fig. 5, this is mainly because the relative flux of regions around point A becomes more and more intense due to the movement of the laser spots towards the LEHs with time, which generates the distribution characteristic of C_{40} and C_{44}. Nevertheless, 0.4% asymmetry of C_{40} and C_{44} meets the need of drive symmetry for ignition.
TACH has the similar symmetrical characteristic with regular hexahedron, which is the underlying physics for TACH to achieve high drive symmetry. As the analysis of sphericalharmonic expansion shows, the symmetrical arrangement of TACH can suppress C_{20} to a very low level and the asymmetry is dominated by C_{40} and C_{44}, which is similar to 6 LEHs spherical hohlraum.
The timevarying symmetries varying with the incident angle of laser beams were also investigated under the condition of CCR = 2.2, as illustrated in Fig. 7. The results show that the initial symmetry has weak relationship with the incident angle. However, this situation changes after 6 ns. The timevarying symmetry becomes better with larger incident angle. The reason is that the distance of laser spots moving along the hohlraum axis is much smaller at a greater incident angle due to the inward movement of the hohlraum wall. Considering the tradeoffs between timevarying symmetry and the laser injection convenience, 55° is chosen as the optimum incident angle of the laser beams.
Based on the above analysis, the optimum size of TACH is CCR = 2.0~2.2 and the optimum incident angle of laser is 55°.
Coupling efficiency
Define “coupling efficiency” as the ratio of absorbed energy E_{C} by capsule to the incident laser energy E_{L}, which is given by
where η_{aL} is the fraction of laser absorbed, and η_{LX} is the laser to xray conversion efficiency.
The coupling efficiencies of several hohlraums are compared, including gasfilled cylindrical hohlraum (GFCH), nearvacuum cylindrical hohlraum (NVCH), six LEHs spherical hohlraum (SLSH) and TACH (CCR = 2.0, 2.2). For the GFCH, η_{aL} is about 0.85 due to the strong backscatter from the inner cone beams^{7}. For the NVCH, η_{aL} is about 0.96^{30}. For SLSH and TACH, η_{aL} is about 0.96, because the properties of LPI of SLSH and TACH are close to those of the outer cone of GFCH with a low level of backscattering. η_{LX} is about 0.8 for all kinds of hohlraums^{31}. Timevarying coupling efficiency comparison of GFCH (R_{H} = 2.95 mm, L = 10.6 mm, LEH ø3.1 mm)^{4,24}, NVCH (R_{H} = 3.36 mm, L = 11.26 mm, LEH ø3.9 mm)^{32}, SLSH (CCR = 4.0, 4.4, LEH ø2.6 mm) and TACH (CCR = 2.0, 2.2, LEH ø2.6 mm) are calculated and shown in Fig. 8. The calculation results show that the timevarying coupling efficiency of TACH with CCR0 is very close to that of SLSH with 2 × CCR0. The coupling efficiencies of TACH (CCR = 2.0), SLSH (CCR = 4.0) and NVCH are close to each other, which is about 13% lower than that of GFCH. The coupling efficiency of TACH (CCR = 2.2) is similar with SLSH (CCR = 4.4), which is about 20% lower than that of GFCH. Nevertheless, it is worthwhile to spend 13%~20% more laser energy for a higher symmetry during the whole period of implosion of capsule. Furthermore, the coupling efficiency of TACH can be increased by above 10% using LEH shields^{20}. Compared with the arrangement of multicone lasers for cylindrical hohlraum, the arrangement of singlecone lasers with large angle can supply sufficient space to place LEH shields.
Plasma filling
The plasma ablated from the hohlraum wall will fill the volume inside the hohlraum, which would affect the injection of laser and limit the performance of hohlraum. The plasma filling time of TACH and cylindrical hohlraum are compared to evaluate the plasma filling problem of TACH. Filling model in ref. 33 is only used in vacuum cylindrical hohlraums, which is extended to gasfilled hohlraums with arbitrary shape in this article. The improved model is shown in Eq. (4), whose detail is shown in the Methods section.
where τ is used to denote the filling time in ns, and n_{gas} is the initial electron density of gas in n_{c}. Helium is chosen as the filled gas. Filling ratio γ = V_{fillwall}/V_{H}, where V_{fillwall} is the filled volume of radiationablated plasma and V_{H} is the hohlraum volume. β = A_{W}/V_{H}. Equivalent energy loss area A_{loss} = (1 − α_{W})A_{W} + (1 − α_{C})A_{C} + A_{L}.
For a radiation temperature T_{r} and an initial filling gas density n_{gas}, the filling model can be used to calculate the filling time it takes for the hohlraum to fill to a filling ratio γ. It can be seen from Eq. (4) that a higher density of initial filling gas or a larger filling ratio corresponds to a longer filling time. For a certain T_{r}, n_{gas}, γ, η_{aL} and η_{LX}, plasma filling time
Define ε as the ratio of the filling time of TACH to the filling time of cylindrical hohlraum. Take α_{W} = 0.8, α_{C} = 0.3, R_{C} = 1.18 mm for two kinds of hohlraum. For TACH (Δ = 100 μm, LEH ø2.6 mm) and cylindrical hohlraum (R_{H} = 2.95 mm, L = 10.6 mm, LEH ø3.1 mm), ε can be calculated from Eq. (5). Figure 9 shows the ε varying with CCR of TACH. For TACHs with CCR between 2.0 and 2.2, ε is between 0.96 and 1.1, so the filling time of TACH is close to cylindrical hohlraum.
Discussion
From another point of view, TACH is composed of six half cylindrical hohlraums (HCHs). For laser injection, the six HCHs can be decoupled from each other, which brings great convenience for laser arrangement. Furthermore, the lasers and plasma condition in each HCH are mainly cylindrical symmetry, so these can be studied approximately by a cylindrical 2D radiation hydrodynamic model. Single cone lasers are injected into each HCH with large incident angle, which is similar to the outer cone of the ignition cylindrical hohlraum in NIC. Therefore, it is reasonable to predict that the backscattering of TACH is as slight as that of the outer cone of the ignition cylindrical hohlraum. In addition, singlecone injection avoids several other LPI problems of multicone cylindrical hohlraums, such as crossedbeam energy transfer between two laser cones, and blocking of the transfer of innercone laser by highZ plasma bubbles ablated by outercone lasers. Moreover, singlecone injection greatly simplifies the symmetry tuning. To optimize the symmetry of a certain TACH, it is only need to adjust the initial position of laser spot and control the power balance of laser. The parameters of TACH can be optimized to control the timevarying asymmetry below 1.0% during the whole drive pulse. The filling time of TACH is close to that of typical ignition cylindrical hohlraum in NIC. Although the coupling efficiency of TACH is about 13%~20% lower than that of ignition cylindrical hohlraum, it is worthwhile to spend 13%~20% more laser energy for the superiorities of TACH as discussed above. Therefore, TACH combines most advantages of various hohlraums and has little predictable risk, providing an important potential way for ignition hohlraum design in ICF.
Methods
The timevarying symmetry calculation by use of view factor model
For a given time, the size and the albedo of TACH can be calculated by the corresponding models as described above. Then the hohlraum wall is divided into zones, and the size of each zone is controlled below 10 μm to ensure adequate resolution. The positions and areas of laser spots are determined by the intersection between the laser beams and the hohlraum wall. Based on this, the ratio of radiation intensity of laser spots to that of reradiated wall can be calculated by Eq. (1). δ is used to denote the ratio, so F_{W} and F_{S} can be set as 1 and δ respectively, which is normalized by F_{W}. For a zone near the edge of the laser spots, maybe only a part of the zone is in the spot, the radiation intensity of the zone is calculated by area weighting. For example, S_{0}, S_{1} and S_{2} denote the total area of this zone, the area of this zone inside and outside the laser spot respectively, so the intensity of this zone can be calculated by (δS_{1} + S_{2})/S_{0}. After setting the normalized distribution of radiation intensity, the radiation symmetry of capsule can be calculated by the view factor model. In the calculation, the drive contribution from each cylindrical hohlraum can be calculated independently, and only the selfblock of capsule needs to be considered.
The extending of filling model
V_{H} is defined as the hohlraum volume. V_{fillwall} and V_{fillgas} are the filled volume of radiationablated plasma and that of gas plasma respectively. Ignoring the volume of laser channels in Au plasma, V_{H} = V_{fillwall} + V_{fillgas}. Define β = A_{W}/V_{H} and filling ratio γ = V_{fillwall}/V_{H}. n_{gas} is used to denote the initial electron density of gas. Helium is chosen as the filled gas. n_{e−c}, n_{e−w} and n_{e−g} are defined as the electron density of Au plasma in laser channel, radiationablated plasma and gas plasma respectively. T_{e−c} is defined as the electron temperature of Au plasma in the laser channel. Z_{c} is the ionization degree of Au plasma in laser channel and Z_{w} is the ionization degree of radiationablated plasma. Laser wavelength is 351 nm. Equivalent energy loss area A_{loss} = (1 − α_{W})A_{W} + (1 − α_{C})A_{C} + A_{L}.
Unit selection: laser power P_{0} uses TW, radiation temperature T_{r} uses eV, electron temperature T_{e−c} uses keV, length uses cm, n_{gas}, n_{e−c}, n_{e−w} and n_{e−g} use n_{c}, and filling time τ uses ns.
According to the power balance of hohlraum,
According to the power balance of laser channel^{33},
According to the pressure balance between laser channel plasma and radiationablated plasma,
The ion and electron temperatures of the gas plasma are supposed equal to the electron temperature of Au plasma in laser channel. According to the pressure balance between gas plasma and radiationablate plasma,
Using filling ratio γ, n_{e−g} can be calculated by
Using Eqs. (128) and (129) in ref. 1 to calculate radiationablated mass rate, and ablated plasma from the hohlraum wall A_{W} is supposed to uniformly fill in the volume of V_{fillwall}.
The ionization degree of radiationablated plasma calculated from Eq. (187) in ref. 1
The ionization degree of Au plasma in the laser channel^{33}
Combining Eqs. (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13) and solving for τ, the improved filling model can be got as shown in Eq. (4).
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Kuang, L. et al. A novel threeaxis cylindrical hohlraum designed for inertial confinement fusion ignition. Sci. Rep. 6, 34636; doi: 10.1038/srep34636 (2016).
References
Lindl, J. D. Development of the IndirectDrive Approach to Inertial Confinement Fusion and the Target Physics Basis for Ignition and Gain. Phys. Plasmas 2, 3933–4024 (1995).
Lindl, J. D. et al. The physics basis for ignition using indirectdrive targets on the National Ignition Facility. Phys. Plasmas 11, 339–491 (2004).
Atzeni, S. & MeyerterVehn, J. In The Physics of Inertial Fusion 398 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2004).
Haan, S. W. et al. Point design targets, specifications, and requirements for the 2010 ignition campaign on the National Ignition Facility. Phys. Plasmas 18, 051001 (2011).
Nuckolls, J. & Wood, L. Laser compression of matter to superhigh densities: Thermonuclear (CTR) applications. Nature 239, 139 (1972).
Hurricane, O. A. et al. Fuel gain exceeding unity in an inertially confined fusion implosion. Nature 506, 343 (2014).
Moody, J. D. et al. Progress in hohlraum physics for the National Ignition Facility. Phys. Plasmas 21, 056317 (2014).
Michel, P. et al. Tuning the Implosion Symmetry of ICF Targets via Controlled CrossedBeam Energy Transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 025004 (2009).
Glenzer, S. H. et al. Symmetric Inertial Confinement Fusion Implosions at UltraHigh Laser Energies. Science 327, 1228–1231 (2010).
Michel, P. et al. Threewavelength scheme to optimize hohlraum coupling on the National Ignition Facility. Phys. Rev. E 83, 046409 (2011).
Rosen, M. D. et al. The role of a detailed configuration accounting (DCA) atomic physics package in explaining the energy balance in ignitionscale hohlraums. High Energy Density Physics 7, 180 (2011).
Caruso, A. & Strangio, C. The quality of the illumination for a spherical capsule enclosed in a radiating cavity. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 30, 1095 (1991).
Amendt, P. et al. Assessing the prospects for achieving doubleshell ignition on the National Ignition Facility using vacuum hohlraums. Phys. Plasmas 14 (2007).
Lan, K., Lai, D., Zhao, Y. & Li, X. Initial study and design on ignition ellipraum. Laser and Particle Beams 30, 175 (2012).
Schnittman, J. D. & Craxton, R. S. Indirect‐drive radiation uniformity in tetrahedral hohlraums. Phys. Plasmas 3, 3786–3797 (1996).
Wallace, J. M. et al. Inertial Confinement Fusion with Tetrahedral Hohlraums at OMEGA. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 19 (1999).
Schnittman, J. D. & Craxton, R. S. Threedimensional modeling of capsule implosions in OMEGA tetrahedral hohlraums. Phys. Plasmas 7, 7 (2000).
Lan, K., Liu, J., Lai, D., Zheng, W. & He, X. High flux symmetry of the spherical hohlraum with octahedral 6LEHs at the hohlraumtocapsule radius ratio of 5.14. Phys. Plasmas 21, 010704 (2014).
Lan, K., He, X.T., Liu, J., Zheng, W. & Lai, D. Octahedral spherical hohlraum and its laser arrangement for inertial fusion. Phys. Plasmas 21, 052704 (2014).
Lan, K. & Zheng, W. Novel spherical hohlraum with cylindrical laser entrance holes and shields. Phys. Plasmas 21, 090704 (2014).
MacFarlane, J. J. VISRAD – A 3D view factor code and design tool for highenergy density physics experiments. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer 81, 287–300 (2003).
Peterson, J. L., Michel, P., Thomas, C. A. & Town, R. P. J. The impact of laser plasma interactions on threedimensional drive symmetry in inertial confinement fusion implosions. Phys. Plasmas 21, 072712 (2014).
Jing, L. et al. Angular radiation temperature simulation for timedependent capsule drive prediction in inertial confinement fusion. Phys. Plasmas 22, 022709 (2015).
Landen, O. et al. Capsule implosion optimization during the indirectdrive National Ignition Campaign. Phys. Plasmas 18, 051002 (2011).
Zhang, H. et al. Xray conversion efficiency and radiation nonuniformity in the hohlraum experiments at ShenguangIII prototype laser facility. Phys. Plasmas 21, 112709 (2014).
Olson, R. E. et al. Xray conversion efficiency in vacuum hohlraum experiments at the National Ignition Facility. Phys. Plasmas 19, 053301 (2012).
MacLaren, S. A. et al. Novel Characterization of Capsule XRay Drive at the National Ignition Facility. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 105003 (2014).
Murakami, M. & MeyerterVehn, J. Indirectly driven targets for Inertial Confinement Fusion. Nuclear Fusion 31, 7 (1991).
Cohen, D. H., Landen, O. L. & MacFarlane, J. J. Numerical modeling of Hohlraum radiation conditions: Spatial and spectral variations due to sample position, beam pointing, and Hohlraum geometry. Phys. Plasmas 12, 122703 (2005).
Hopkins, L. F. B. et al. First highconvergence cryogenic implosion in a nearvacuum hohlraum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 175001 (2015).
Hinkel, D. E. et al. Creation of Hot Radiation Environments in LaserDriven Targets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 195001 (2006).
Hopkins, L. F. B. et al. Nearvacuum hohlraums for driving fusion implosions with high density carbon ablators. Phys. Plasmas 22, 056318 (2015).
Schneider, M. B. et al. Plasma filling in reducedscale hohlraums irradiated with multiple beam cones. Phys. Plasmas 13, 112701 (2006).
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the beneficial discussions with Dr. Tianming Song and Mr. Dong Yang. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grand Nos 11435011, 11475154, 11305160, 11405160, 11505170), the Fund of National Science and Technology on Plasma Physics Laboratory (No. 9140C680104140C68287), and the Fund of Center of Fusion Energy Science and Technology (No. J2014040104).
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
L.K. designed this hohlraum and accomplished most computational tasks. H.L. wrote the manuscript. L.J. accomplished the viewfactor simulation tasks. Z.L., L.Z. and L.L. discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. Y.D. and S.J. are principal investigators of hohlraum design project. J.L. and J.Z. reviewd the manuscript and gave many useful suggestions.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Kuang, L., Li, H., Jing, L. et al. A novel threeaxis cylindrical hohlraum designed for inertial confinement fusion ignition. Sci Rep 6, 34636 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34636
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Study of the asymmetry of hotspot selfemission imaging of inertial confinement fusion implosion driven by highpower laser facilities
Plasma Science and Technology (2020)

Experimental demonstration of the reduced expansion of a laserheated surface using a low density foam layer, pertaining to advanced hohlraum designs with less wallmotion
Physics of Plasmas (2020)

Foamlined hohlraum, inertial confinement fusion experiments on the National Ignition Facility
Physical Review E (2020)

Multipass active stretcher with large chirp for highflux ultraintense lasers
Optics Letters (2019)

Experimental progress of inertial confinement fusion based at the ShenGuangIII laser facility in China
Nuclear Fusion (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.