Abstract
The shape transformation of some biological systems inspires scientists to create sophisticated structures at the nano and macro scales. However, to be useful in engineering, the mechanics of governing such a spontaneous, parallel and large deformation must be well understood. In this study, a kirigami approach is used to fold a bilayer planar sheet featuring a specific pattern into a buckliball under a certain thermal stimulus. Importantly, this prescribed spherical object can retract into a much smaller sphere due to constructive buckling caused by radially inward displacement. By minimizing the potential strain energy, we obtain a critical temperature, below which the patterned sheet exhibits identical principal curvatures everywhere in the selffolding procedure and above which buckling occurs. The applicability of the theoretical analysis to the selffolding of sheets with a diversity of patterns is verified by the finite element method.
Introduction
Currently, the inability to rapidly and precisely fabricate highly complex sophisticated structures at the micro and nanoscales has considerably impeded their applications^{1}. Recently, an alternative approach has been developed via the folding planar sheets (panels) with prescribed features, such as ridges and grooves, into sophisticated 3D objects^{2}. Because these sheets can be quickly fabricated with unprecedented precision using lithographic techniques^{3} and the selffolding procedure can spontaneously occur in a parallel manner, this approach is particularly attractive for assembling complex structures efficiently and economically, and it has the potential to overcome fabrication difficulties at small scales^{4}.
The technique of fabricating 3D objects from planar sheets is referred to as the origami approach because the original idea originates from origami, the traditional art of paperfolding, which is popular in China and Japan. The origami approach has been developed to produce fairly complex structures, such as a flapping bird by folding a sandwichlike sheet along predesigned veins^{5}, and a periodic structure consisting of extruded cubes, which can be actively deformed into numerous specific shapes through embedded actuation^{6}. Additionally, novel techniques, such as direct ink writing, exhibit attractive features to realize the design rules that are required for an origamibased structure^{7}. Instead of folding a flawless sheet along some specified creases as in the origami approach, the kirigami method signifies an alternative approach to forming 3D structures from a patterned planar sheet, which relies on the folding of a sheet that is perforated into some specific patterns. The presence of apertures allows more flexible control of the selffolding process, therefore enabling programmable fabrication of complex structures.
The kirigami approach is demonstrated in nature in the formation of the curled leaves of some tropical plants^{8}. This approach was recently exploited to fabricate biomimetic robotics by utilizing the active response of electroactive polymers and shape memory polymers^{9}. Bucklinginduced deformation was used in the kirigami approach to fabricate diverse 3D membrane architectures by releasing a prestrained stretchable substrate on which a thin layer of metal was cut into predefined patterns^{10}. More recently, researchers have identified multilevel hierarchical patterns as a way to transform the sheet into many desirable programmed shapes^{11,12}. In the kirigami approach, the diversity of the cutting patterns greatly expands the design space, and it is, therefore, worthy of further investigation. This approach is expected to be capable of fabricating synthetic materials or devices for a range of novel applications, such as drug delivery agents^{13}, soft robotics^{14}, optical metamaterials^{15}, solar cells^{16} and untethered microsurgical tools^{17}, which will potentially lead to immense scientific and economic benefits.
This study aims to employ the kirigami approach to producing a buckliball, a collapsible structure notable for its opening and closing behaviors, similar to Hoberman Toy Spheres^{18} and the morphing of some viruses. With 24 circular dimples on a spherical shell, a buckliball can easily shrink into an enclosed balllike structure that occupies nearly half of its original space. This special geometry enables us to achieve a much more sophisticated configuration than previous studies^{9,10,11,12,19}. This paper focuses on the response of patterned planar sheet to a thermal stimulus, which is more applicable to bionics and medical science than electrical and mechanical stimuli. Specifically, the sheet will undergo the following two major deformation steps: (1) It bends homogenously, during which the principal curvatures at any point are predominantly equal in all directions. Different from most of the existing selffolding structures, buckling is strictly prohibited in this step; otherwise, the shell will not bend into a spherical shape but rather will present saddlelike shapes and curled edges. (2) Bucklinginduced deformation becomes dominant in the subsequent retraction of the buckliball that is formed in the previous step. Buckling is one of the most important factors in the kirigami approach and subsequent morphing process. Yet, precise buckling control remains challenging for the kirigami approach, primarily due to the inherent coupling between the different components.
The planar sheet consists of two polymer layers, and such a soft material can rapidly respond to thermal stimuli and bear external osmotic pressure. The material distribution in the 2D design domain of a planar sheet determines its outofplane deformation and should be purposely patterned to achieve the desired final shape. To obtain such a perquisite kirigami pattern, the buckliball is first divided into several equal parts before being flattened into a plane. By minimizing the potential strain energy over the sheet, the relationship between the principal curvatures and temperature can be established and computationally verified. The creation of a buckliball by folding a patterned sheet and its subsequent bucklinginduced retraction is numerically simulated using finite element analysis in the commercial FE software Abaqus. The influence of the sheet pattern on the folding procedure is investigated by testing the configurational diversity, including holeless petals and petals dotted with circular apertures.
Methods
Strategic Pattern Design
Our analysis can be used for buckliballs of any thickness and arbitrary geometry. To meet the requirements of macro/micro applications, we choose a structure where the size of the target buckliball (Fig. 1a) is dimensionless, and its external and internal radii are 33 and 31 units, respectively. The aperture has a roundedsquare shape in which the distance between the opposite vertices is 22. To obtain a buckliball with a large volume retraction ratio, a 2D pattern is first designed using a superformula, which can generate a variety of complex shapes^{20}. Compared with circular apertures, the volume retraction ratio of a buckliball with roundedsquare apertures can be improved by 8.65%^{20}. Because the shape transformation is inherently reversible, an intuitive way to obtain the planar pattern of a 3D object is by unfolding it^{21}. Recently, an algorithm was developed to design the folding creases for the art of origami^{22,23}. Unfortunately, this algorithm is inapplicable to the design of the kirigami pattern. To address this issue, the unfolding procedure of the model in Fig. 1a is split into the following two steps: partition and disassembling. As a buckliball dotted by evenly distributed apertures is geometrically analogous to a tetrahexahedron with a hole on each face, it is straightforward to split it into 24 identical parts, as shown in Fig. 1a. The base cell, or a 1/24 part of the buckliball, is composed of one aperture and four curved triangle parts (denoted by two similar green triangles, one pink triangle, and one cyan triangle).
Folding 2D nets to 3D polyhedrons along the shortest paths (geodesics) in the configuration space is one of the two geometric principles of the design of selffoldable structures^{24}. While this principle is effective for thermally responsive sheets whose bending is restricted to the hingelike creases in the origami approach^{25}, it is unsuitable for the bending resulting from material swelling/shrinking over an entire domain with the kirigami procedure. To obtain a strategic pattern so that the soft material can bend in the same way as a squid stretches its tentacles, the base cell should be first squeezed into a sheet by strengthening the arc length of all edges, forming a flat polyhedral face as shown in Fig. 1b.
It is helpful to make the 2D pattern doubly symmetric because this will lead to symmetric folding which is beneficial to effectively reduce potential mismatches^{26}. Therefore, the three pieces of a polyhedral face shown in Fig. 1b are first united by sharing the edges of the cyan parts, constructing a part featuring 3fold rotational symmetry (Fig. 1c). To achieve bilateral symmetry, the two parts shown in Fig. 1c are further connected at the vertexes of the green triangles (Fig. 1d). Because such vertexes are liable to induce numerical singularity in a finite element analysis, these singlenodal joints are artificially eliminated by filling materials into their adjacent areas, which is magnified in Fig. 1e. By rotating the pattern in Fig. 1d three times by 90°, 180° and 270° about its leftmost vertex, three similar petals are obtained. The combination of these petals, therefore, forms a square symmetric pattern featuring a span of 203.01 in the horizontal and vertical directions (Fig. 1f).
Results
Theory of Curvature Variation
In addition to the geometric pattern, the selffolding process depends on other factors, such as material properties, type of stimulus and layer thickness. For simplicity, this study is limited to a bilayer polymer sheet whose bending is attributed to the disparity of the thermal expansion coefficients in the top and bottom layers. To illustrate the nature of the bending, we consider a shell with a total thickness of h = h_{1} + h_{2}. The bottom active layer and the top passive layer are tightly bonded, and their thicknesses are h_{1} and h_{2}, respectively (shown in the lowerright inset of Fig. 2). The thickness ratio of the bottom layer to top layer is fixed as h_{1}:h_{2} = 3:1. To obtain a spherical shell as shown in Fig. 1a, the longitudinal principal curvature κ_{y} and the transverse principal curvature κ_{x} are used to depict the shape of the bilayer sheet undergoing deformation. The direction of these two curvatures is illustrated in Fig. 1. To yield a buckliball, κ_{x} = κ_{y} must be maintained in the selffolding process. Upon determination of the pattern, the remaining geometric parameter that could affect the selffolding is the layer thickness.
Prior to the theoretical analysis, numerical simulations are conducted to investigate the role of thickness in the selffolding process. The simulations reveal that there are three major stages in the folding of the patterned sheet, as illustrated in Fig. 1f if its total thickness is as small as h = 0.2. Because the ratio of the shell thickness to its outofplane deformation is relatively small, the folding is subject to pure linear deformation, which is governed by the classic thinshell theory in Stage 1. In Stage 2, the transverse displacements and rotations become relatively large compared with the vertical displacement; thus, a nonlinear deformation is dominant, and the increase of the principal curvatures becomes nonlinear with respect to the temperature increase. Nevertheless, the values of longitudinal principal curvature κ_{y} and the transverse principal curvatures κ_{x} remain the same in Stage 2 as in Stage 1. As a result, the shell can form a spherical surface in the first two stages, as shown in the upperleft and uppermiddle insets in Fig. 2. However, the spherical surface will become a saddle shape, and the petal edges are curled in Stage 3 (shown in the upperright inset in Fig. 2) when the temperature reaches a critical point, denoted by the red star in Fig. 2. In Stage 3, the petals bend more profoundly along the transverse direction than the longitudinal direction, resulting in curled edges that widely exist in nature. For instance, many leaves present such a shape when exposed to a dry climate for a long time^{27}. Unlike our approach, in which the thermal stimulus serves as the driving force, the evaporation of water is the reason of the curled leaves. However, both the thermal stimulus and the evaporation of water allow the potential strain energy to approach the minimal point^{28}.
The previous theoretical analysis of such a folding procedure was mainly limited to material properties, such as Poisson’s ratio, Young’s modulus, the thermal expansion coefficient,^{19} and some simple geometrical parameters, e.g., layer thickness^{29}. However, the sheet pattern, to the best of our knowledge, has not been previously explored. As the primary premise of the kirigami approach is attributed to the diversity of shell patterns, it is necessary to theoretically analyze this approach, which is analogous to many naturally occurring shape transformations.
To avoid unexpected folding patterns, such as the saddlelike shapes and curled edges observed in Fig. 2, we investigate the association of the bending mode with the thickness, thereby determining the two distinct bending modes, as shown in Fig. 3. When h = 1, the shell folds into an ellipselike object (the upperleft picture in Fig. 3), but the four petals cannot be merged due to the geometric constraint of these four petals being originally specified for a sphere. Continuing to increase the total thickness to h = 2, a buckliball gradually takes the shape shown in the upperright inset in Fig. 3. The bottom graphical inset in Fig. 3 illustrates the crosssectional profile (xz plane) of the folded shell in the abovementioned cases. When the thickness is small (h = 0.2), the crosssectional profile (solid pink curve) is approximately a part of a circle with a large radius. However, its buckleinduced deformation at the petal edges is not reflected. With an increase in the thickness, the cross section bends more severely and finally converges to a circle (the red dotted shape in Fig. 3).
The above simulations schematically reveal the dependence of the selffolding modes on the shell thickness. Hereafter, several simulations using different thicknesses clearly indicate that a critical temperature exists in the folding process, beyond which κ_{x} and κ_{y} bifurcate. When the temperature is confined to a limited range, selffolding of this planar sheet can be controlled by changing its thickness. Correspondingly, a critical thickness similar to the critical temperature can be determined. To obtain the critical value, we minimize the potential energy of the sheet perforated into a specified pattern.
At any point, three displacement components (u_{1}, u_{2} and u_{3} in the x, y and zaxes, respectively) in the neutral plane of the plate are assumed as^{30}:
where x, y and z are the coordinates of this point in a Cartesian coordinate system, and A_{i} and B_{i} are the parameters to be determined. This assumption is based on the classic Kirchhoff plate theory^{28} (the derivation is provided in the Supplementary Information (SI)). The total strain ε_{αβ} (α, β = 1 or 2) can be formulated as:
The stain energy density per thickness U_{ti} (i = 1, 2 denotes the layer sheet) can be represented as:
where E_{i} and α_{i} denote the Young’s modulus and the thermal expansion coefficient of each layer, respectively, and U_{di} is the strain energy density. According to Eq. (S1), the strain energy density U_{di} depends on stress σ, which is a function of temperature T, as expressed in Eq. (S2). Note that in Eq. (3), the Cartesian coordinate system has been converted to a polar coordinate system through x = r cos θ and y = r sin θ. The aperture shape is determined by the Gielis’ superformula^{31} as:
where the parameters are given as a = b = 0, m = 4, n_{1} = 150, n_{2} = n_{3} = 100, and w = 18. Considering the sophistication of using Eq. (4) in subsequent derivations, the aperture edge is divided into 4 elliptical arcs; each of these arcs can be further simplified (as shown in the SI). Due to the thickness being small relative to the other dimensions, the sheet can be approximated as a plate. Therefore, the strain energy U can be obtained by integrating the strain energy density U_{ti} in the z direction given as:
The strain energy in Eq. (5) relies on U_{ti} in Eq. (3). For instance, the strain energy is the energy of the base cell if the domain is confined to the shape shown in Fig. 1b. However, the strain energy of the petal can be determined using coordinate transformation in the integration, as each petal comprises six identical base cells. The detailed derivation is provided in the SI. Because the partial derivative of the total energy with respect to the unknown parameters A_{i} and B_{i} should be equal to zero, i.e., ∂U/∂A_{i} = 0, ∂U/∂B_{i} = 0, A_{i,} B_{i} can be determined. As a result, the partial derivatives of the total energy with respect to the two principal curvatures can also be obtained. A general expression of the total strain energy U for complex structures is provided in the Supplementary Information. Using our choice of buckliball geometry and the parameters h_{1} = 0.75 h, Poisson’s ratio μ = 0.3, α_{1} = 0, α_{2} = −0.005/°C, E_{1} = 3 MPa and E_{2} = 0.8 MPa (see the description in the next section) together with ∂U/∂κ_{x} = 0 and ∂U/∂κ_{y} = 0, we obtain:
With the elimination of temperature T in Eqs (6) and (7), a simplified expression can be obtained as:
Two solutions of this equation, specifically κ_{x} = κ_{y} and 4113κ_{x}κ_{y} = h^{2}, characterize two explicit equilibrium states. The first signifies that the two principal curvatures must be strictly the same, as demonstrated in Stage 1 and Stage 2 shown in Fig. 2. The second solution implies that the product of the two principal curvatures is a constant in terms of thickness. As shown in Fig. 2, the two principal curvatures deviate in Stage 3, and the bifurcation point must satisfy both of these two solutions. Therefore, a critical curvature can be obtained as:
Eq. (9) indicates that the critical curvature is linear with respect to the sheet thickness. Substituting the critical curvature into Eq. (6), a critical temperature is thus determined as:
The expression of the critical temperature in Eq. (10) indicates that the thinner the sheet, the lower the critical temperature. For the final temperature T = 45.2 °C, which was determined in the previous simulation tests, the critical thickness is h^{*} = 1.78. Therefore, any patterned sheet that is thinner than this critical value is unable to selffold into a perfect spherical configuration because these two principal curvatures would deviate in Stage 3 (i.e., κ_{x} > κ_{y}). In contrast, for a sheet thicker than this critical value, the folding is limited in Stages 1 and 2 (κ_{x} = κ_{y}), and a buckliball can be formed.
To further verify the critical curvature κ^{*} in Eq. (9) and the critical temperature T^{*} in Eq. (10), several representative thicknesses (h = 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 1, 1.2, 1.5 and 1.8) of the patterned sheet are tested computationally. The critical curvatures (blue squares) and critical temperature (blue stars) of these samples are plotted in Fig. 4. As demonstrated, their differences compared to the theoretical analysis (red solid line and blue dashed line) are fairly small.
Numerical Simulation
To validate the critical thickness obtained from the theoretical analysis and gain more insights into the deformation of the patterned sheet, the kirigami approach to forming a buckliball from a planar patterned sheet with a thickness of h = 2 > h^{*} and consequent bucklinginduced retraction is simulated by finite element analysis. All of the examples in this and the above sections are subject to the same experimental conditions.
In the family of stimulusresponsive hydrogels, the temperaturesensitive hydrogel poly(Nisopropylacrylamide), abbreviated as PNIPAM, is selected as the active material in the top layer because it is thermally hypersensitive and can work at normal temperature^{32}. The Young’s modulus and thermal expansion coefficient of PNIPAM are 0.8 MPa and −0.005/°C, respectively^{5}. The passive material in the bottom layer is a polymer, which has a Young’s modulus of 3 MPa. Its thermal expansion coefficient is negligible compared with that of the active material in the top layer. The operational temperature is set from 20 °C to 55 °C^{5}, and the temperature increases linearly.
Abaqus is used for the nonlinear finite element analysis, in which the model is discretized into the C3D8R element (an 8node linear brick with reduced integration). To eliminate friction, the top and bottom faces of the sheet are assumed to be very smooth. However, the lateral faces have to be rough; otherwise, they could peel off after contact during the bending procedure. Gravity is taken into account because it can hinder the bending and subsequently influence the final configuration^{33}. To avoid rigid body motion and unsymmetrical deformation, the center point of the patterned sheet is pinned. A nonlinear finite element simulation takes requires approximately 2–3 hours for both the selffolding and retraction processes.
The initial state of the sheet at 20 °C is depicted in Fig. 5a. With increasing temperature, the active layer (top) shrinks while the passive polymer layer (bottom) retains its volume. Such a responsive disparity makes the sheet bend upward (Fig. 5b–d). In the beginning, each group (Fig. 1c) of these three base cells bends toward its center and forms a large spherical surface, as shown in Fig. 5b. Then, the bending mainly occurs at the weak junctions (e.g., Fig. 1e) and presents four curved petals as shown in Fig. 5c. Finally, the vertices of the 4 petals merge precisely, and a buckliball (Fig. 5d) is obtained at 45.2 °C.
In the selffolding process, some apertures are deformed in the horizontal direction, while the others are compressed in the vertical direction. However, the structure still exhibits a rotational symmetry, as it represents the mode with the minimal strain energy, namely, the one with the lowest eigenvalue. However, such symmetry in other potential modes cannot be held. In the mode corresponding to the second lowest eigenvalue, the buckliball deforms into an ellipsoid whose equator swells outwards. In the modes with the third and fourth eigenvalues, the buckling takes place only in specific locations, such as the two poles of the buckliball, leading to severely deformed apertures.
Because the critical temperature is as high as T^{*} = 52 °C for the thickness of h = 2, the entire deformation process is confined to Stage 1 and Stage 2. Thus, the unexpected bucklinginduced saddleshape and curled edges are avoided. The average external radius of this buckliball is 33.28, only 0.86% greater than the expectation (Fig. 1a). Thus, we can claim that the kirigami approach successfully meets the fabrication expectation.
To illustrate the retraction of the buckliball, the radially inward displacement u_{r} is applied uniformly on its external surface. Its maximum value has been calculated to avoid severe distortions. By increasing the displacement linearly while maintaining the temperature at 45.2 °C, the narrow ligaments of the buckliball begin to buckle (Fig. 5f). With the material rotation at the buckling points, the initial squarelike apertures deform into diamond shapes (Fig. 5g), and its size becomes smaller progressively until completely squeezed (Fig. 5h). To avoid sophisticated structural interactions, the simulation is terminated when the aperture boundaries begin to contact. In the final state, the buckliball becomes a nearly enclosed ball in which the volume retraction ratio reaches 57.34%, which is very close to the theoretical limit of 59.23%. Notably, the peak stress appears in the junction region of the buckliball, as shown in Fig. 5. The selffolding process and the retraction of the buckliball are recorded in Video 1 and Video 2, respectively, which are published in the SI.
The processes of selffolding and volume retraction are reversible. If the radially inward displacement u_{r} varies from 8.7 to 0 linearly, the buckliball will expand into the state illustrated in Fig. 5e. Then, with the decrease of temperature, the enclosed buckliball will gradually open up and finally become flat, as shown in Fig. 5a.
Notably, the critical temperature is highly dependent on the shape of the perforated holes. By changing the shape of the internal holes in the pattern, as shown in Fig. 5a, we investigate the selffolding for a sheet (1) with circular holes and (2) without perforation. More details are given in the SI.
Discussion
We propose a kirigami approach to creating highly sophisticated 3D structures via the selffolding of a bilayer patterned planar sheet. The approach is inspired by the shape transformation of some biological systems and the wellunderstood shape control of soft materials.
By partitioning and flattening a buckliball, we can devise a planar pattern for a sheet composed of two layers of temperaturesensitive hydrogel and a temperatureinsensitive polymer. By minimizing the potential strain energy of the system, we find that the longitudinal and transverse principal curvatures respond to the increase of temperature through the following three stages: (1) uniform and linear deformation; (2) identical but nonlinear deformation; and (3) bifurcated and inversely proportional deformation. It is concluded that the spherical selffolding process can be achieved as long as the sheet thickness is above the critical value, thereby limiting the deformation to the first two stages.
The theoretical analysis is verified by the finite element simulation. The simulation indicates that the selffolding mode is highly dependent on the sheet thickness. It is also shown that the selffolding process can be altered by changing the sheet pattern. In addition, the bucklinginduced retraction of the buckliball derived from the kirigami approach is simulated. Importantly, the methodology demonstrated in this study signifies a way to utilize the buckling of a structure.
Although a buckliball is used as a representative example in this paper, the kirigami approach can be used to design and fabricate more complex structures if they can be partitioned and disassembled in the same manner as the buckliball. Hierarchical patterns could be considered for the formation of complex structures and will be studied in the future. The minimal strain energy method used to determine the critical thickness and critical temperature is applicable to any arbitrary pattern as long as the surface integration in Eq. (3) can be obtained. The selffolding of a planar sheet under stimuli other than temperature can be explored using the same or similar methodology in the future for other applications. Further studies may explore applications in the areas of biological morphogenesis, microrobotics and biomedical devices.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Lin, S. et al. A Kirigami Approach to Forming a Synthetic Buckliball. Sci. Rep. 6, 33016; doi: 10.1038/srep33016 (2016).
References
 1.
PerazaHernandez, E. A., Hartl, D. J., Malak Jr, R. J. & Lagoudas, D. C. Origamiinspired active structures: a synthesis and review. Smart Materials and Structures 23, 094001 (2014).
 2.
Lang, R. J. & Hull, T. C. Origami design secrets: mathematical methods for an ancient art. The Mathematical Intelligencer 27, 92–95 (2005).
 3.
Maune, H. T. et al. Selfassembly of carbon nanotubes into twodimensional geometries using DNA origami templates. Nature nanotechnology 5, 61–66 (2010).
 4.
Chalapat, K. et al. Self‐Organized Origami Structures via Ion‐Induced Plastic Strain. Advanced Materials 25, 91–95 (2013).
 5.
Na, J. H. et al. Programming Reversibly Self‐Folding Origami with Micropatterned Photo‐Crosslinkable Polymer Trilayers. Advanced Materials 27, 79–85 (2015).
 6.
Overvelde, J. T. et al. A threedimensional actuated origamiinspired transformable metamaterial with multiple degrees of freedom. Nature Communications 7 (2016).
 7.
Ahn, B. Y. et al. Printed origami structures. Advanced Materials 22, 2251–2254 (2010).
 8.
Jazebi, S. Origami, Kirigami, And The Modeling Of Leaves: An Interactive Computer Application PhD Degree Thesis thesis. The University of Calgary (2012).
 9.
Rossiter, J. & Sareh, S. Kirigami design and fabrication for biomimetic robotics. In SPIE Smart Structures and Materials+ Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring. 90550G90550G90558 (International Society for Optics and Photonics).
 10.
Zhang, Y. et al. A mechanically driven form of Kirigami as a route to 3D mesostructures in micro/nanomembranes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 11757–11764 (2015).
 11.
Cho, Y. et al. Engineering the shape and structure of materials by fractal cut. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 17390–17395 (2014).
 12.
Erb, R. M., Sander, J. S., Grisch, R. & Studart, A. R. Selfshaping composites with programmable bioinspired microstructures. Nature communications 4, 1712 (2013).
 13.
Fernandes, R. & Gracias, D. H. Selffolding polymeric containers for encapsulation and delivery of drugs. Advanced drug delivery reviews 64, 1579–1589 (2012).
 14.
Baisch, A. T. & Wood, R. J. Popup assembly of a quadrupedal ambulatory microrobot.InIntelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. 1518–1524 (IEEE) (2013).
 15.
Cho, J. H. et al. Nanoscale origami for 3D optics. Small 7, 1943–1948 (2011).
 16.
Guo, X. et al. Twoand threedimensional folding of thin film singlecrystalline silicon for photovoltaic power applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 20149–20154 (2009).
 17.
Gultepe, E. et al. Biopsy with Thermally‐Responsive Untethered Microtools. Advanced materials 25, 514–519 (2013).
 18.
Shim, J., Perdigou, C., Chen, E. R., Bertoldi, K. & Reis, P. M. Bucklinginduced encapsulation of structured elastic shells under pressure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5978–5983 (2012).
 19.
Ionov, L. Soft microorigami: selffolding polymer films. Soft Matter 7, 6786–6791 (2011).
 20.
Lin, S., Xie, Y. M. & Li, Q., Huang, X. & Zhou, S. Bucklinginduced retraction of spherical shells: A study on the shape of aperture. Sci. Rep. 553, 842 (2015).
 21.
An, B., Benbernou, N., Demaine, E. D. & Rus, D. Planning to fold multiple objects from a single selffolding sheet. Robotica 29, 87–102 (2011).
 22.
Hawkes, E. et al. Programmable matter by folding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 12441–12445 (2010).
 23.
Tachi, T. Simulation of rigid origami. Origami 4, 175–187 (2009).
 24.
Pandey, S. et al. Algorithmic design of selffolding polyhedra. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 19885–19890 (2011).
 25.
Malachowski, K. et al. Stimuli‐Responsive Theragrippers for Chemomechanical Controlled Release. Angewandte Chemie 126, 8183–8187 (2014).
 26.
Tolley, M. T. et al. Selffolding origami: shape memory composites activated by uniform heating. Smart Materials and Structures 23, 094006 (2014).
 27.
Liang, H. & Mahadevan, L. The shape of a long leaf. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 22049–22054 (2009).
 28.
Masters, C. B. & Salamon, N. Geometrically nonlinear stressdeflection relations for thin film/substrate systems. International journal of engineering science 31, 915–925 (1993).
 29.
HeeáLee, J. & Stephen, Z. Threedimensional actuators transformed from the programmed twodimensional structures via bending, twisting and folding mechanisms. Journal of Materials Chemistry 21, 6824–6830 (2011).
 30.
Bower, A. F. Applied mechanics of solids, (CRC press, Boca Raton,U.S., 2009).
 31.
Gielis, J. A generic geometric transformation that unifies a wide range of natural and abstract shapes. Am. J. Bot. 90, 333–338 (2003).
 32.
Karg, M., Pastoriza‐Santos, I., Liz‐Marzán, L. M. & Hellweg, T. A versatile approach for the preparation of thermosensitive PNIPAM core–shell microgels with nanoparticle cores. ChemPhysChem 7, 2298–2301 (2006).
 33.
Guo, W., Li, M. & Zhou, J. Modeling programmable deformation of selffolding allpolymer structures with temperaturesensitive hydrogels. Smart Mater. Struct. 22, 115028 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (project number DE120102906) and Discovery Project (DP160101400). In addition, the support from the State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, China, Open Research Fund Program (31415005) is appreciated.
Author information
Affiliations
Centre for Innovative Structures and Materials, School of Engineering, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne 3001, Australia
 Sen Lin
 , Yi Min Xie
 , Xiaodong Huang
 & Shiwei Zhou
School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
 Qing Li
Authors
Search for Sen Lin in:
Search for Yi Min Xie in:
Search for Qing Li in:
Search for Xiaodong Huang in:
Search for Shiwei Zhou in:
Contributions
S.L. and S.Z. designed the study, performed the experiments and wrote the paper; Y.M.X., Q.L. and X.H. provided critical suggestions.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Shiwei Zhou.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Further reading

A mazelike path generation scheme for fused deposition modeling
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (2019)

Mechanical behaviour of a creased thin strip
Mechanical Sciences (2018)

Shell buckling: from morphogenesis of soft matter to prospective applications
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.