Article | Open | Published:

Effect of land use and hydrological processes on Escherichia coli concentrations in streams of tropical, humid headwater catchments

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 32974 (2016) | Download Citation


Lack of access to clean water and adequate sanitation continues to be a major brake on development. Here we present the results of a 12-month investigation into the dynamics of Escherichia coli, a commonly used indicator of faecal contamination in water supplies, in three small, rural catchments in Laos, Thailand and Vietnam. We show that land use and hydrology are major controlling factors of E. coli concentrations in streamwater and that the relative importance of these two factors varies between the dry and wet seasons. In all three catchments, the highest concentrations were observed during the wet season when storm events and overland flow were highest. However, smaller peaks of E. coli concentration were also observed during the dry season. These latter correspond to periods of intense farming activities and small, episodic rain events. Furthermore, vegetation type, through land use and soil surface crusting, combined with mammalian presence play an important role in determining E. coli loads in the streams. Finally, sampling during stormflow revealed the importance of having appropriate sampling protocols if information on maximum contamination levels is required as grab sampling at a fixed time step may miss important peaks in E. coli numbers.


Although much is known about the sources, transport and fate of faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in temperate climates, a more detailed investigation of the factors influencing the environmental attenuation of FIB in tropical environments is needed1. In developing countries river water subject to wastewater contamination is often used for domestic purposes (cooking, washing, etc.). In Asia, for example, it is estimated that over 40% of rural drinking water sources are contaminated2. Moreover, many developing countries are experiencing strong demographic pressures along with rapid shifts in land use3. In order to respond to the increasing demand for clean water and sanitation, it is essential that we have an understanding of the sources and the drivers of contaminants in tropical aquatic systems. Therefore, recognizing and understanding the relative influence of natural and human-induced processes on hydrological and biogeochemical functioning are prerequisites for improved water resources management.

The microbiological quality of rivers is primarily controlled by human and animal density and the management of their waste in the watershed4,5. In developing countries and particularly in rural areas, agriculture is less intensive than in developed countries, wastewater treatment is often lacking and diffuse (non-point) sources of FIB tend to predominate6. In these rural areas with low human population densities, the primary source of FIB is faecal matter generated by livestock and wild animals. Causse et al.4, working in rural Laos, found that numbers of Escherichia coli, a commonly used FIB7,8, were below 1 most probable number (MPN) 100 mL−1 in the upper areas of the watershed. These authors proposed that this very low background level of contamination was probably caused by wildlife. They also showed that FIB concentration increased as the density of poultry and humans settlements increased in downstream areas.

Other, non-agricultural diffuse sources of microbial pollution in rural watersheds include failing septic systems and latrine overflows during periods of heavy rain. As a consequence of their dispersion, these diffuse sources of microbial pollution are inherently more difficult to identify and characterize than point sources. Moreover, the lack of infrastructure in the rural areas of developing countries also means that very little data is available on FIB contamination. This is particularly so in South East Asia where little information is published in the international literature.

Heavy rainfall and stormwater discharges can rapidly deteriorate surface water quality9 by increasing turbidity, suspended solids, organic matter and faecal contamination4,10,11. In urban areas without adequate wastewater treatment or stormflow mitigation management, heavy rainfall washes off FIB and other contaminants from the ground surface12. In rural areas, especially in areas with bare soil and/or annual crops, similar heavy rainfall leads to the erosion of soil and, hence of any faecal matter on the soil surface3,13. This elevated overland flow is due, in part, to higher rates of soil surface crusting under bare soils and in annual and perennial crops (e.g. teak trees) that reduce soil infiltrability14,15,16. Thus in both rural and urban areas, one of the major pathways via which faecal contaminants enter waterways is overland flow4,17,18.

FIB concentrations in storm-generated overland flow are controlled by many factors such as rainfall duration and intensity, manure application, faecal deposit age and type, adsorption to soil particles1,19,20,21. Causse et al.4 reported values of 230,000 MPN 100 mL−1 of E. coli in overland flow during a storm downstream of a village area. Other authors have also observed higher FIB numbers during storms10,11 relative to during baseflow. On the other hand, increases in discharge during stormflow may dilute FIB concentrations and differences in land use and vegetation cover may also interact to reduce the transport of FIB from the soil surface into the stream. However, given the high variability in vegetation cover and rainfall that occurs across different study sites and the paucity of data on FIB in rural, tropical catchments, it is difficult to make any regional generalizations at present.

The study presented here was conducted in a network of well characterized (soil, morphology, land use, etc.) catchments. The main hydrological variables (stream discharge), water quality variables (soil loss due to the land erosion, suspended load and bed load), and meteorological variables (air temperature, rainfall, etc.) have been monitored since 2001 in each of the catchments. Given the strong relationships between mammalian presence and E. coli loads in streams that have been observed in temperate environments and that the highest overland flows are observed in areas with bare soils and/or crops, we hypothesized that the highest E. coli loads would be observed in catchments with high mammalian presence, highest percentage of annual crop cover and during stormflow.

The objectives of this work were (1) to examine the seasonality in FIB loads in three comparable rural catchments located in three countries of South East Asia (Laos, Thailand and Vietnam), and (2) to identify during which hydrological periods (e.g. stormflow periods or baseflow periods) the highest FIB contamination levels are observed.

Material and Methods

Study sites

The three study sites (Fig. 1) are subject to a tropical climate which is influenced by the southwest monsoon bringing warm and humid air masses during the wet season (April-September), and by the northeast monsoon bringing colder, dryer air during the dry season (October-March). Rainfall is highly seasonal with more than 80% of annual rainfall occurring during the wet season. In Laos and Thailand average daily temperatures are highest in April at the end of the dry season when they can reach 40 °C. In Vietnam the highest temperatures generally occur in July and August. Vietnam also has the highest amplitude in terms of temperature variations over the annual cycle (+/−23 °C relative to +/−16 and 15 °C for Laos and Thailand, respectively). Global radiation (GR) varies between 401 and 2,151 J cm−2 and GR is the highest in Laos, the lowest in Vietnam and intermediate in Thailand (Table 1).

Figure 1: The three studied catchments of the MSEC network and their land use in 2015.
Figure 1

The land use maps were created with land survey data from the three sites using QGIS software ( and the map of Southeast Asia was created for this article with Microsoft Office Visio 2007.

Table 1: Study sites and catchments characteristics.

The three studied catchments are part of the MSEC monitoring network ( Each catchment is located in an upland rural area and at a similar elevation range. The catchments were selected for the regional representativeness of their geomorphic, climatic and land use characteristics, for their relatively easy access for field sampling and monitoring, and for their contrasted land uses (Table 1). The Houay Pano catchment is located about 10 km south of Luang Prabang city, Laos. Similar to other parts of Northern Laos, teak tree plantations cover a large part of the catchment surface area (Fig. 1)18,22. There are some vegetable crops but this is concentrated in small patches along the stream. Otherwise agriculture has remained low input and manual23. The Dong Cao catchment is located in Northern Vietnam, about 50 km southwest of Hanoi. As a consequence of soil exhaustion and erosion, declining yields and governmental incentives, tree plantations (e.g. Acacia mangium) have increased in extent and density on the steep slopes18,24. Livestock is also bred in the catchment and non-cultivated land is used for pasture or is partly planted with grass fodder (Bracharia ruziziensis)25. The Huay Ma Nai catchment is located in Northern Thailand, about 550 km north of Bangkok. Maize is the dominant crop and agriculture in the catchment is dependent on external inputs of fertilizers and pesticides and on frequent use of machinery for tillage26.

Hydro-meteorological measurements and water sampling

Daily rainfall data was collected by automatic rain gauges (Campbell ARG100, 0.2 mm capacity tipping-buckets) in each of the three catchments. Stream water level was measured at the outlet of each catchment with 1 mm vertical precision at a minimum of 3 minute time interval by a water level recorder (OTT, Thalimedes) equipped with a data logger within a V-notch weir in Laos and Vietnam and a Parshall flume in Thailand. A control rating curve (the relationship between water level and discharge) was determined using the velocity area method at each station. The accuracy of stream discharge (Qsw) is considered to be within +/−10% of the measured value.

Samples of streamwater (500 ml) were collected in new, clean, plastic bottles during base and storm flows approximately twice per month at the outlet of each catchments from October 2014 (end of rainy season 2013–2014) to October 2015 (end of rainy season 2014–2015; Table 1). Temperature and electrical conductivity (EC) of the streamwater were measured using a Multi Probe System (YSI 556 MPS) in Laos, and a WTW multiparameter probe (MultiLine® Multi 3410 IDS) in Thailand and Vietnam. The uncertainty of EC is estimated to be ±5% of stream EC value, which corresponds to the instantaneous variability in the stream section during a storm event.

The concentration of total suspended solid (TSS) was determined for each sample after filtration on 0.2 μm porosity cellulose acetate filters (Sartorius) and evaporation in an oven at 105 °C for 48 h. There was no TSS data available for Huay Ma Nai due to a technical problem. The uncertainty is considered to be within +/−10% of the measured value for TSS.

E. coli determinations

The standardized microplate method (ISO 9308-3) was used for E. coli number determinations. Each sample was incubated at four dilution rates (i.e. 1:2, 1:20, 1:200 and 1:2000) in a 96-well microplate (MUG/EC, BIOKAR DIAGNOSTICS) and incubated for 48 h at 44 °C. Ringers’ Lactate solution was used for the dilutions and one plate was used per sample. The number of positive wells for each microplate was noted and the MPN was determined using the Poisson distribution. This microplate method has previously been used with success in one of the studied agro-ecosystems4,9.

Soil surface crusting rate

Because soil surface crusting has been found as the most effective predictor of overland flow in these catchments14,16,25,27, it was used in this study as a proxy of overland flow. On the scale of the catchment it was determined from data on vegetation cover in each catchment (Fig. 1) and the values of soil surface crusting rates from hundreds of data collected under different land uses and vegetation cover for Houay Pano16. The soil surface crusting rate ascribed to each land use and vegetation cover was assumed to be homogenous for each land use type across each of the three catchments.

Statistical analyses

The significance of the differences between parameters across the three catchments was determined using the program R28. The Welch two-sample t-test was used to determine the significance of the differences between crusting rates, runoff rates and people.days. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine if the distribution of the E. coli concentrations was significantly different between catchment. Significance was set at p < 0.05.


Seasonal variations

Houay Pano, Laos

Annual rainfall (October 2014 to October 2015) in the Houay Pano catchment, Laos was 1,465 mm and was close to the annual average of 1,585 mm (Table 1). Over the sample year, several rain events occurred that resulted in a rapid increase in discharge (Fig. 2). This was particularly noticeable during the wet season (April to October) where the repetition of rain events of sufficient intensity and volume resulted in a peak of discharge of 2.51 L s−1 ha−1 on September 4th, 2015. At this site, EC varied between 223 and 345 μS cm−1 and was the lowest during periods of high rainfall. TSS also varied over the year with higher concentrations observed during the high rainfall periods concomitant with high discharge and low conductivity. E. coli concentrations also varied between 78 and 14,000 MPN 100 mL−1 and were higher during periods of high discharge.

Figure 2: Baseflow (inter-storm) and stormflow in the Houay Pano catchment, Laos.
Figure 2

Rainfall intensity (daily time step; mm d−1); stream specific discharge (Qs, L s−1 ha−1); electrical conductivity (EC, μS cm−1); total suspended solids (TSS, g L−1); E. coli concentration in stream (E. coli, MPN 100 mL−1). Black filled symbols: baseflow samples, grey filled symbols: stormflow samples.

In Houay Pano, four stormflow samples were measured corresponding to four separate storm events (Fig. 2). For each of these samples, the values of EC, TSS and E. coli differed considerably from baseflow values. For example, EC varied between 74 and 197 μS cm−1 as compared to an average of 264 μS cm−1 for the non-storm event samples. Moreover, TSS and E. coli concentrations were over two orders of magnitude higher in the stormflow samples as compared to during the baseflow period.

Dong Cao, Vietnam

A similar pattern was observed in Dong Cao, Vietnam (Fig. 3) although rain intensity was higher in Vietnam during the study period, reaching 209 mm d−1 on September 17th, 2015. Total annual rainfall the catchment was 1,474 mm, close to the annual average of 1,556 mm (Table 1). As in Laos, heavy rains resulted in peaks of discharge in the stream and the highest discharge (4.55 L s−1 ha−1) was observed on September 17th, 2015 concomitant with the highest rainfall intensities. EC decreased initially from October 2014 to December 2014 and thereafter remained relatively stable over the year. A similar pattern was observed for TSS. E. coli numbers varied from 78 to 890 MPN 100 mL−1 and were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than those observed in Laos. The highest numbers found during the periods of higher rainfall. Compared to the Houay Pano catchment, the differences in values between baseflow and stormflow in the Dong Cao catchment were lower. For example, EC was about 50 μS cm−1 lower in the stormflow samples, relative to EC during the baseflow period. Moreover, E. coli numbers were only an order of magnitude higher in the stormflow samples whereas TSS was two orders of magnitude higher.

Figure 3: Baseflow (inter-storm) and stormflow in the Dong Cao catchment, Vietnam.
Figure 3

Rainfall intensity (daily time step; mm d−1); stream specific discharge (Qs, L s−1 ha−1); electrical conductivity (EC, μS cm−1); total suspended solids (TSS, g L−1); E. coli concentration in the stream (E. coli, MPN 100 mL−1). Black filled symbols: baseflow samples, grey filled symbols: stormflow samples.

A detailed sampling was also conducted during a short duration storm event (169 minutes duration) in this catchment (Fig. 4). On the 6th June 2015 a rain event with a peak intensity of 40 mm h−1 occurred at 16:45. This resulted in rapid increase in stream discharge that peaked at 51 L s−1. The peak in discharge was followed by a decrease in EC from 150 μS cm−1 to 65 μS cm−1. The decrease in EC was also paralleled by an increase in TSS, the dynamic of which closely followed that of discharge. Over the course of the storm event, E. coli numbers varied between 290 to over 11,000 MPN 100 mL−1, a factor almost 40 increase. E. coli numbers then decreased with the declining flood phase to reach values similar to initial (pre-flood) values of 510 MPN 100 mL−1.

Figure 4: Stormflow event in the Dong Cao catchment, Vietnam.
Figure 4

Rainfall intensity (hourly time step; mm h−1); stream discharge (Q, L s−1); electrical conductivity (EC, μS cm−1); total suspended solids (TSS, g L−1); E. coli concentration in the stream (E. coli. MPN 100 mL−1).

Huay Ma Nai, Thailand

In contrast to Houay Pano and Dong Cao, annual rainfall over the study period in the Huay Ma Nai catchment in Thailand was over 30% lower than the annual average (921 mm versus 1,385 mm; Table 1). Nevertheless, as for the Houay Pano and Dong Cao catchments, episodes of heavy rainfall resulted in an increase in stream discharge (Fig. 5). Indeed, discharges of up to almost 0.25 L s−1 ha−1 were observed on the August 14th, 2015. Large decreases in EC were also observed during the periods of high discharge. Indeed, EC decreased from 320 μS cm−1 during the periods of low discharge to 70 μS cm−1 during the period of high discharge (3rd August–12th September 2015). E. coli concentrations also varied over the year and were of the same order of magnitude as for Houay Pano (78 and 14,000 MPN 100 mL−1; p > 0.05). They were however, significantly higher than the concentrations observed in the Vietnamese catchment (p < 0.05). As in the other catchments, the highest values were observed during the summer months when rainfall and discharge were highest. The loads of E. coli for each catchment over the sample year are shown in Fig. 6. As for the concentrations, loads were lowest during the dry season when rainfall and discharge was lowest. A significant difference was observed between catchments for E. coli loads during dry season (from October 2014 to mid May 2015).

Figure 5: Baseflow (inter-storm) and stormflow in the Huay Ma Nai catchment, Thailand.
Figure 5

Rainfall intensity (daily time step; mm d−1); stream specific discharge (Qs, L s−1 ha−1); electrical conductivity (EC, μS cm−1); total suspended solids (TSS, g L−1); E. coli concentration in the stream (E. coli, MPN 100 mL−1). Black filled symbols: baseflow samples, grey filled symbols: stormflow samples.

Figure 6: E. coli loads and rainfall for each of the three studied catchments (E. coli, MPN s−1 ha−1).
Figure 6

Hydrology and land use

In Dong Cao, where E. coli concentrations, human and animal presence and soil surface crusting16,25 (vegetation cover is almost exclusively Acacia mangium) in the watershed was significantly lower than in the two other catchments (p < 0.05; Fig. 7). This site is also characterized by low erosion rates and low overland flow (excepting the tropical storm on 17th September 2015). In contrast, in Huay Ma Nai, maize is the predominant crop, soil crusting is high16,27 and up to 150 people can be in the catchment during specific periods. This situation results in significantly higher overland flow (p < 0.05) and significantly different E. coli numbers in the stream (p < 0.05). In between these two situations, the Houay Pano catchment is intermediate. Vegetation cover is more mixed, with teak tree plantations and fallow being the most prevalent. This mixed situation gives strongly contrasting soil crusting rates with very high rates in the teak tree plantations and very low rates of soil crusting in the fallow areas16. This results in an intermediate soil crusting rate on the scale of the catchment. However, Houay Pano also has a high number of people.days. These two factors (soil surface crusting and human presence) interact to give streamwater E. coli concentrations that are significantly different from those of Dong Cao (p < 0.05) but similar to those of Huay Ma Nai (p > 0.05, Fig. 7). Moreover, the differences between Dong Cao and Houay Pano are all the more evident during the storm events when overland flow is higher than during baseflow (Figs 2 and 3).

Figure 7: Escherichia coli (E. coli), soil surface infiltrability and mammalian presence in the studied catchments.
Figure 7

Concentrations of E. coli in streamwater during baseflow (Dong Cao ≠ Houay Pano = Huay Ma Nai; p < 0.05), soil surface crusting rate (Dong Cao < Houay Pano < Huay Ma Nai; p < 0.05), runoff (Dong Cao < Houay Pano < Huay Ma Nai; p < 0.05), and people.days (Dong Cao < Huay Ma Nai < Houay Pano; p < 0.05) as a proxy of mammalian density (left side panel). Conceptual diagram showing the relationship between mammalian density, soil surface infiltrability and stream E. coli loads (right side panel). Each of the three studied catchments is placed on the graph as indicated by a red line. A change in either soil infiltrability or mammalian density would result in a change in the position along and across the different zones.



The three study sites are subject to strong seasonal differences. Indeed, in Houay Pano, Laos, E. coli concentrations were over two orders of magnitude higher during the wet season than during the dry season. Although the difference in E. coli concentrations between the two seasons was lower in the other two sites, there was at least one order of magnitude difference between the dry and the wet seasons. This marked seasonal difference in FIB numbers has been previously observed29,30 and the few data that exist from humid tropical regions also confirm this trend4,6. The large differences in FIB numbers between the two seasons are principally due to two factors. Firstly, FIB in streams in rural areas, such as in the catchments examined in this work, originate from human and animal defecation4. In some areas unrestricted access to waterways can result in the direct inoculation of the watercourse with FIB31, however, in these catchments defecation mostly occurs on the slopes in grazing areas, in areas with latrines or in informal defecation sites4. One can therefore hypothesize that little or no transfer of faecal matter into the waterways occurs during the dry season, although it should be borne in mind that humans and animals can cause the local resuspension of soil or sediment particles when they use or cross the stream during dry periods10. In contrast, during periods of rainfall that induce overland flow, large quantities of faecal matter are washed off into the stream from the soil surface in the catchment4,32. This explains why much higher FIB numbers are found in the stream during the wet season.

This explanation is rather simplified and does not take into account the resuspension of bacteria during storm events when stream flow is high. It has been shown that the resuspension of particle-associated FIB can be an important source of FIB to the water column during flood events9. Nor does it take into account the impact of groundwater flow on E. coli numbers. Groundwater generally has very low concentrations of FIB compared to overland flow33,34 and when it mixes with overland flow, the streamwater is diluted, thereby decreasing the concentration of FIB. This dilution can be particularly high in systems where the contribution of groundwater flow to stream flow is high. However, while groundwater itself dilutes streamwater, at least in terms of E. coli numbers, high groundwater fractions are often accompanied by a strong shear stress, which stimulates streambed sediment resuspension resulting in higher E. coli numbers. This resuspension can represent a significant secondary source of FIB1,9.

Land use, hydrology and potential health threat

The variability in human activity over the annual cycle in the three catchments also influences E. coli concentrations in the streams (Fig. 7). In Thailand, maize crops are harvested during September and October at the end of the rainy season. This is a labour intensive activity involving many people in the field (up to 150 at a time). During this period, informal latrines are used. This probably results in injections of faecal material into the stream as evidenced by the increased E. coli numbers in the stream during this period (Fig. 5).

A similar situation occurs in Houay Pano, Laos. In general, preparation of the fields for the growing season starts in March and April. During this period, the use of informal latrine sites increases. Due to a lack of sanitation facilities in the upper catchment, people defecate out of sight in fallow plots along hillslopes or in the vicinity of the stream in the remaining riparian vegetation. At this time of year, small rain events are frequent resulting in short episodes of overland flow and increased discharge. These small events are characterized by highly contaminated overland flow9 and this probably explains the very high E. coli numbers and TSS observed in the Houay Pano stream in March (Figs 2 and 7). March and April are the hottest months of the year in Laos and streamflow is lowest. During these months, farmers and villagers often use streamwater for their domestic requirements as many wells become dry at this time of year (personal observation). Moreover, in the upper sections of the catchment where most of the crops are grown (Fig. 1) there are no potable water sources and the farmers drink streamwater and water from ephemeral unprotected wells that can be easily contaminated by overland flow.

Clearly, the consumption of contaminated stream water holds some health risks35. Indeed, for many of the sample dates, E. coli numbers exceeded the limit of 500 colonies 100 mL−1 above which the World Health Organization considers that there is a 10% risk of gastro-intestinal illness after one single exposure36. Therefore, the use of water from sites with high FIB numbers poses a serious threat to public health. We did not conduct epidemiological studies in parallel with this work; however, it would be interesting in future studies to investigate this health threat.

Methodological aspects

The differences in FIB numbers between baseflow and stormflow samples of up to two orders of magnitude also highlight the importance of having appropriate sampling protocols. If grab samples are taken at a fixed time step then an average estimate of FIB numbers will be obtained which may miss any peaks due to short, rapid events. The rain events in the catchments investigated here resulted in flash floods with lag times on the order of 10 to 15 minutes9 and with peaks of contamination of 14,000 MPN 100 mL−1. These “hot moments”37 of contamination would have been missed if samples had not been collected during stormflow. This is the case in all three catchments as presented here as well as in city sewer drains in tropical Singapore11 and in other work32,35 further highlighting the importance of adequate sampling during stormflow. The selection of sampling frequency will depend on the objectives of the study nevertheless if an estimation of the variability of FIB numbers is required, it is probably better to select a variable time step that is linked to discharge rather than to a fixed time step. By fixing the sample interval to an increase in discharge, one can sample during events with significant overland flow and sample “hot moments” with a high frequency. Moreover, having information on E. coli concentrations over a much longer period of time (e.g. 10 years) would enhance the robustness of the conclusions of this type of study. However, such a long term program would also need to be considered in the context of the social, economic and technological development trajectories of the studied countries.

An aspect that was not investigated in this work is the possibility of regrowth of E. coli in the stream itself1. Several authors have proposed that E. coli can grow in the environment, i.e. outside their original host organism38,39. This could be particularly problematic in humid, tropical countries such as those investigated in this work as temperatures remain high throughout the year. The presence of small swamps and ponds along the stream course in these small catchments may also provide an ideal environment for the naturalization of E. coli. Small ponds are often used for aquaculture and they are sometimes also fertilized with manure, thereby increasing the E. coli available nutrients and hence the numbers of E. coli20. These ponds are often shallow, but due to riparian vegetation, light penetration is low. Thus, the high concentrations of organic matter and nutrients present may provide an adequate nutritional source to E. coli and the shallow sediments provide a physical protection against solar light and predators. All of this contributes to favour the growth of E. coli1 in the environment. Finally, the application of more advanced techniques such as the identification of biomarkers of faecal matter sources40,41 provides an interesting way of identifying FIB sources (e.g. chickens, pigs, humans), particularly in these mixed use catchments. Knowing the sources of FIB also helps to evaluate the level of risk associated with the contamination. However, the analytical capacities in the study sites were insufficient; it is therefore difficult to determine if the faecal contaminants are of human or animal origin.


We show that land use, vegetation cover and hydrology, strongly control E. coli concentrations in three tropical, rural streams in Southeast Asia confirming what has been previously shown for temperate environments42,43 and for pathogenic bacteria in this region44. The maintenance of adequate vegetation and the use of management practices that reduce erosion will not only reduce soil losses and increase soil carbon storage, it will also contribute to better surface water quality thereby reducing the risks to the human populations using the water resource45,46. In future work, it will be necessary to apply modelling techniques that are adapted to these small, montane water courses to understand and quantify the different roles of overland flow and groundwater flow during flood events. This is particularly important as regards the opposing roles that groundwater outflow may have on streamwater contamination during stormflow events: 1) the dilution effect of contaminated overland flow waters along the stream path, and 2) the resuspension of contaminated sediments in the streambed. Having more fine scale data on the dynamics of the different water masses and their relative E. coli concentrations during storm events is a fundamental requirement for these models. The relatively high levels of background contamination in each of the three watersheds points towards the need for more information on the behaviour of FIB in tropical environments. Better estimates of FIB die-off rates in these rural, montane watersheds and a clarification of whether or not these indicator bacteria are capable of surviving and growing outside their host are necessary.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Rochelle-Newall, E. J. et al. Effect of land use and hydrological processes on Escherichia coli loads in streams of tropical, humid headwater catchments. Sci. Rep. 6, 32974; doi: 10.1038/srep32974 (2016).


  1. 1.

    , , , & A short review of faecal indicator bacteria in tropical aquatic ecosystems: knowledge gaps and future directions. Frontiers in Microbiology: Aquatic Microbiology 6, 308, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00308 (2015).

  2. 2.

    et al. Global assessment of exposure to faecal contamination through drinking water based on a systematic review. Trop. Med. Int. Health 19, 917–927, doi: 10.1111/tmi.12334 (2014).

  3. 3.

    et al. Runoff and sediment losses from 27 upland catchments in Southeast Asia: Impact of rapid land use changes and conservation practices. Ag. Ecosys. Environ. 128, 225–238, doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.06.004 (2008).

  4. 4.

    et al. Field and modelling studies of Escherichia coli loads in tropical streams of montane agro-ecosystems J Hydro-Environ. Res. 9, 496–507, doi: 10.1016/j.jher.2015.03.003 (2015).

  5. 5.

    , , , & Modelling faecal indicator concentrations in large rural catchments using land use and topographic data. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94, 962–973, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01877.x (2003).

  6. 6.

    , , , & Seasonal variability of faecal indicator bacteria numbers and die-off rates in the Red River basin, North Viet Nam. Scientific Reports 6, 21644, doi: 10.1038/srep21644 (2016).

  7. 7.

    , , & Escherichia coli: the best biological drinking water indicator for public health protection. J. Appl. Microbiol. 88, 106S–116S, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2000.tb05338.x (2000).

  8. 8.

    et al. Derivation of numerical values for the World Health Organization guidelines for recreational waters. Water Res. 38, 1296–1304, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.11.032 (2004).

  9. 9.

    et al. Use of fallout radionuclides (7Be, 210Pb) to estimate resuspension of Escherichia coli from streambed sediments during floods in a tropical montane catchment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 3427–3435, doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5595-z (2016).

  10. 10.

    et al. Land use and water quality along a Mekong tributary in Northern Lao PDR. Environ. Manage. 47, 291–302, doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9593-0 (2011).

  11. 11.

    , , & Temporal variation of faecal indicator bacteria in tropical urban storm drains. Water Res. 68, 171–181, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.049 (2015).

  12. 12.

    , & Levels and patterns of fecal indicator bacteria in stormwater runoff from homogenous land use sites and urban watersheds. J. Water Health 9, 279–290, doi: 10.2166/wh.2010.056 (2011).

  13. 13.

    et al. Soil erosion, dissolved organic carbon and nutrient losses under different land use systems in a small catchment in northern Vietnam. Ag. Wat. Man. 146, 314–323, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.09.006 (2014).

  14. 14.

    et al. Impact of slope gradient on soil surface features and infiltration on steep slopes in northern Laos. Geomorphology 127, 53–63, doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.12.004 (2011).

  15. 15.

    & Morphology, Genesis and Classification of Surface Crusts in Loamy and Sandy Soils. Geoderma 55, 225–245 (1992).

  16. 16.

    et al. Analysis of runoff production at the plot scale during a long-term survey of a small agricultural catchment in Lao PDR. J. Hydrol. 426, 79–92, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.015 (2012).

  17. 17.

    , & Overland flow delivery of faecal bacteria to a headwater pastoral stream. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99, 126–132 (2005).

  18. 18.

    et al. Contradictory hydrological impacts of afforestation in the humid tropics evidenced by long-term field monitoring and simulation modelling. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 20, 2691–2704, doi: 10.5194/hess-20-2691-2016 (2016).

  19. 19.

    , , & Release and Removal of Microorganisms from Land-Deposited Animal Waste and Animal Manures: A Review of Data and Models. J. Environ. Qual. 44, 1338–1354, doi: 10.2134/jeq2015.02.0077 (2015).

  20. 20.

    & Microbial risk assessment of livestock-integrated aquaculture and fish handling in Vietnam. Fish. Sci. 74, 1062–1068, doi: 10.1111/j.1444-2906.2008.01625.x (2008).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Rainfall-induced release of fecal coliforms and other manure constituents: Comparison and modeling. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7531–7539, doi: 10.1128/aem.01121-06 (2006).

  22. 22.

    , & Forest Transitions and Rural Livelihoods: Multiple Pathways of Smallholder Teak Expansion in Northern Laos. Land 3, 482 (2014).

  23. 23.

    et al. Long-term soil carbon loss and accumulation in a catchment following the conversion of forest to arable land in northern Laos. Ag. Ecosys. Environ. 169, 43–57, doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.02.007 (2013).

  24. 24.

    & Afforestation and forestry land allocation in northern Vietnam: Analysing the gap between policy intentions and outcomes. Land Use Policy 26, 458–470, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.06.003 (2009).

  25. 25.

    et al. Land-use impacts on surface runoff and soil detachment within agricultural sloping lands in Northern Vietnam. Catena 74, 109–118 (2008).

  26. 26.

    et al. Impact of land use change and rainfall on sediment and carbon accumulation in a water reservoir of North Thailand. Ag. Ecosys. Environ. 140, 521–533, doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.02.006 (2011).

  27. 27.

    , , & Soil crusting and infiltration on steep slopes in northern Thailand. European Journal of Soil Science 54, 543–553 (2003).

  28. 28.

    R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing (Vienna, Austria , 2013).

  29. 29.

    , & Fecal coliform accumulation within a river subject to seasonally-disinfected wastewater discharges. Water Res. 44, 4776–4782, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.05.060 (2010).

  30. 30.

    , , , & Effect of environmental factors on the relationship between concentrations of coprostanol and fecal indicator bacteria in tropical (Mekong delta) and temperate (Tokyo) freshwaters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 814–821, doi: 10.1128/aem.70.2.814-821.2004 (2004).

  31. 31.

    , & Unrestricted cattle access to streams and water quality in till landscape of the Midwest. Ag. Wat. Man. 95, 322–330, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.10.017 (2008).

  32. 32.

    , , & The influence of rainfall on the incidence of microbial faecal indicators and the dominant sources of faecal pollution in a Florida river. J. Appl. Microbiol. 98, 1127–1136, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02554.x (2005).

  33. 33.

    , & Input of fecal coliform bacteria to an upland stream channel in the Yorkshire Dales. Water Resour. Res. 28, 1869–1876, doi: 10.1029/92WR00771 (1992).

  34. 34.

    , & Coliform Contamination of a Coastal Embayment:  Sources and Transport Pathways. Environ. Sci. Tech. 30, 1872–1881, doi: 10.1021/es950466v (1996).

  35. 35.

    et al. Estimated human health risks from recreational exposures to stormwater runoff containing animal faecal material. Environmental Modelling & Software 72, 21–32, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.05.018 (2015).

  36. 36.

    WHO. Guildelines For safe recreational water environments. (WHO, Geneva, 2003).

  37. 37.

    & Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 83, 184–199, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.025 (2015).

  38. 38.

    , , & Presence and growth of naturalized Escherichia coli in temperate soils from lake superior watersheds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 612–621, doi: 10.1128/aem.72.1.612-621.2006 (2006).

  39. 39.

    et al. Factors Controlling Long-Term Survival and Growth of Naturalized Escherichia coli Populations in Temperate Field Soils. Microbes Environ. 25, 8–14, doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME09172 (2010).

  40. 40.

    et al. Development of microbial and chemical MST tools to identify the origin of the faecal pollution in bathing and shellfish harvesting waters in France. Water Res. 44, 4812–4824, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.061 (2010).

  41. 41.

    , & The coprostanol/sterol ratio as indicator of organic matter provenance in soils and rivers. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta 69, A756–A756 (2005).

  42. 42.

    , , & Fecal bacteria in the rivers of the Seine drainage network (France): Sources, fate and modelling. Sci. Total Environ. 375, 152–167, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.12.010 (2007).

  43. 43.

    , & Faecal-indicator concentrations in waters draining lowland pastoral catchments in the UK: relationships with land use and farming practices. Water Res. 36, 1725–1734, doi: 10.1016/S0043-13540100394-3 (2002).

  44. 44.

    et al. Land use and soil type determine the presence of the pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei in tropical rivers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5943-z (2016).

  45. 45.

    , & Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature doi: 10.1038/nature15744 (2015).

  46. 46.

    , & Soil stewardship as a nexus between Ecosystem Services and One Health. Ecosystem Services 17, 40–42, doi: (2016).

Download references


This work has benefited of the financial support of the French ANR “Teciteasy” (ANR-13-AGRO-0007), French Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) through the ECOFILTER project (LMI LUSES), the UMR iEES-Paris and the UMR GET. The MSEC (Multi-Scale Environmental Changes, network is also thanked, as well as the French watershed network (RBV, Réseau des Bassins Versants) of the French observatory for Sciences of the Universe (Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers). The authors gratefully acknowledge the Agriculture Land-Use Planning Center (DALaM, Laos), the National Park Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department (DNP, Thailand), the Soils and Fertilizers Research Institute (SFRI, Vietnam). Guillaume Lacombe (IWMI-Laos) is also thanked for his invaluable help.

Author information


  1. iEES-Paris (IRD, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, INRA, UPEC, Université Paris Diderot), CC237, 4 place Jussieu, 75005, Paris, France

    • Emma J. Rochelle-Newall
  2. Géosciences Environnement Toulouse (GET), UMR 5563 (CNRS-UPS-IRD), 14 avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France

    • Olivier Ribolzi
    •  & Laurie Boithias
  3. IRD-iEES-Paris, Department of Agricultural Land Management (DALaM), P.O. Box 4199, Ban Nongviengkham, Xaythany District, Vientiane, Lao PDR

    • Marion Viguier
    • , Chanthamousone Thammahacksa
    • , Norbert Silvera
    • , Keooudone Latsachack
    • , Bounsamay Soulileuth
    •  & Alain Pierret
  4. Soils and Fertilizers Research Institute (SFRI), Duc Thang Ward, Bac Tu Liem District, Hanoi, Vietnam

    • Rinh Pham Dinh
    •  & Hai Tran Sy
  5. National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department (NPD), 61 Phaholyotin Road, Ladyao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand

    • Piyapong Naporn
    •  & Nikom Hmaimum
  6. National University of Laos (NUoL), Faculty of Agriculture, Nabong Campus, Ban Paksap Mai, Xaythany District, Vientiane, Lao PDR

    • Pem Sisouvanh
  7. iEES-Paris (IRD, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, INRA, UPEC, Université Paris Diderot), Centre IRD France-Nord, 32 avenue Henri Varagnat, 93143 Bondy Cedex, France

    • Henri Robain
    • , Jean-Louis Janeau
    •  & Christian Valentin


  1. Search for Emma J. Rochelle-Newall in:

  2. Search for Olivier Ribolzi in:

  3. Search for Marion Viguier in:

  4. Search for Chanthamousone Thammahacksa in:

  5. Search for Norbert Silvera in:

  6. Search for Keooudone Latsachack in:

  7. Search for Rinh Pham Dinh in:

  8. Search for Piyapong Naporn in:

  9. Search for Hai Tran Sy in:

  10. Search for Bounsamay Soulileuth in:

  11. Search for Nikom Hmaimum in:

  12. Search for Pem Sisouvanh in:

  13. Search for Henri Robain in:

  14. Search for Jean-Louis Janeau in:

  15. Search for Christian Valentin in:

  16. Search for Laurie Boithias in:

  17. Search for Alain Pierret in:


O.R., A.P. and E.J.R.-N. designed the experiments; C.T., N.S., K.L., R.P.D., P.N., H.T.S., B.S., N.H., P.S., H.R., C.V. and J.-L.J. carried out the work; E.J.R.-N., O.R., M.V., A.P. and L.B. interpreted the results and E.J.R.-N., O.R., A.P., M.V., N.S. and L.B. wrote the manuscript that was revised and improved by all the coauthors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma J. Rochelle-Newall.

About this article

Publication history





Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.